₦airaland Forum

lol, sorry for the cool dude, that's supposed to be Cl bracket open 8 bracket close. Cl ( 8 )


Seun, emoticons don shpoil the sow , lmao!

PASTOR,

Great to see you, , Iba o!

____________________________________

The system used in Lagos is straight forward and involves the use of
seventeen books, in which the first book is the meji as in the method of
organization used in Ode Remo. The remaining books go through the sequence
with the Odu leg of a particular Odu appearing on the right.

The method from Ode Remo is interesting to me because when it is
written from right to left using the images of Ode it creates the symbol of the
pyramid based on the mathematical angles that create the golden mean which
is represented by the Ifa symbol of the snail. I cannot believe this is a
coincidence and do believe it is part of the mystery of understanding the nature
and function of Odu a glimpse into hidden awo within the system itself.

Ire
Awo Falokun Fatunmbi

Compare Awo Fatunmbi's conclusion on the sequencing and configurations of Odu IFA with this knowledge conclusion below on Clifford Algebra:


The first thing that I would tell you would be that Clifford algebras
(working over the real numbers and using Euclidean signature)
have the structure of the binomial triangle,
so that the Clifford algebra Cl(n) has structure like:

n Total
Dimension

0 1 2^0 = 1= 1x1
1 1 1 2^1 = 2= 1+1
2 1 2 1 2^2 = 4= 2x2
3 1 3 3 1 2^3 = 8= 4+4
4 1 4 6 4 1 2^4 = 16= 4x4
5 1 5 10 10 5 1 2^5 = 32=16+16
6 1 6 15 20 15 6 1 2^6 = 64= 8x8
7 1 7 21 35 35 21 7 1 2^7 = 128=64+64
8 1 8 28 56 70 56 28 8 1 2^8 = 256=16x16


Clifford algebras Cl(N) for very large N may describe Simplex Physics at the Highest Energies, Cl(N) breaks up into the Periodicity-8 tensor product
Cl(N) = Cl( x , N/8 times, x Cl() of N/8 factors, each of which is Cl(. Cl( is 16x16 = 256-dimensional:

Human divination systems are manifestations of a fundamental way of perceiving phenomena of Life, the Universe, and Everything. The most fundamental (and oldest) such system is IFA, also known as VoDou, which, like the Clifford Algebra Cl(, is based on 16x16 = 256 elements. Other systems, such as I Ching, which is based on 8x8=64 elements, seem to me to correspond to subsets of IFA - VoDou.

From Frank Dodd (Tony) Smith. Jr.
_________________________________

Awo Fatunmbi called the 256 Odu a pyramid - which is a three dimensional figure in space. Clifford Algebra whic deals with vectors, spinors and spatial maths and quantum physics calculates the spinor for Cl( and comes up with 16x16 =256, and it translates into a pyramid.

This establishes the relationship between IFA, Algebra, Geometry and Spatial Vectors. My next quest will be to find the link between the Egyptian pyramids and IFA, examining Fatunmbi's conclusion that - "it creates the symbol of the pyramid based on the mathematical angles that create the golden mean which is represented by the Ifa symbol of the snail."

If there is a connection, then it will add credibility to the popular claim (including the evidence of Oranmiyan's staff - an obelisk at Ife) that Lamarudu (Al' Marud, Imrod) was an import from the East (Upper Egypt, Kush).

Someone just proposed marriage to me and he would really want to settle down very soon.

I have not developed love for him but I am very positive I can grow to love him with time. I have not given him an answer cos i told him to allow some level of friendship develop between us, to which he agreed.

The problem is that he is not attractive. He is on the ugly side. But since I want to settle down after so many disappointments I am likely to accept this proposal with time.

But is there something I can do to make him look better? At least presentable? Please help me

You already have many wise inputs. Allow me to add two.

1. Look at the highlight in the quote, that's the keyword! By choice, he is not your type. However, ,

If he is not your type today, he is not your type tomorrow, he will not be your type day after, you will end up not wanting to go out with him and the marriage will begin to loose dynamics. , so you decide.

2. Based on my own experience with women. The ugly ones are unpleasant to look at but,, their unclothedness and sex is the best, everything is always right and tight and elastic. On the flip side, I don't know if thats true for a woman's experience of an ugly man. If that's a truth, then I urge you to explore him from a sexual angle, you might be surprised that you discover a new beauty and pride in him. Try it!

Ah, kini? Oh my God, TOH is back in action! Yepa ripa! Babe, I missed you. Whats going on?

This is even more profounding,

http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/IFA256oduEH.html

I have been looking for this for months, the link between IFA Corpus and binary technology. Enjoy it.


http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/VodouFA.html

Very very very confident if the bible is anything to go by

.

Isn't that contradictory? Why the doubt?

Pastor,

I enjoy reading your posts, very informative and mind provoking. The Madoff trust did not start with Madoff. I am glad mention is made in this article about childhood trust. Here is my take on the issue and quite honestly it's a gripe but I will keep it polite and clean.

In a house or a familiar sorrounding, children are trusting and they let go of their dependencies and in fact become independent and free roaming. In that sorrounding they exercise liberty and free speech and bear open their soul and let out their innocence and impulses. This changes when you step out of that familiar sorrounding with them and into a strange or new territory. What is their first instinct in this zone?

They reach out and seek your hand for a reassuring grip. Sometimes they might grab hold of your clothing. Everything at that moment is in reference to something else and their mind is instantly probing that new environment for signs of threat or danger. But danger from what? What is a little child afraid of loosing?

We are all afraid of loosing nurture. Nurture is a security, it is what sustains our subsistence and survival in life and it is physical. . .it is spiritual. . .it is mental. . .and it is abstract! In the above scenario, the child is making reference and needs to be reassured that you still belong to him/her - an emotional expression of attachment or a physical touch of territorial ownership. To disposess the child of its sense of ownership and attachment you reduce tension and subdue elements of threat and introduce a soft and inviting friendliness, sometimes with food or candy. In actuality, you have not changed the sorrounding, you have only hidden the dangers. The food and candy is an exchange of value.

What you are telling the child is. . .look, you have a value in your parent that you cherish and you are attached to, I also have a value in this candy that I cherish and we can trade values. If you will let go of your parent's hands and clothings and walk few steps over here I will give you this candy if you want it. The child has no matured sense of weights so it recognizes the sweetness of candy, it wants it and so let go of your hand and takes few steps to the stranger and accepts the candy. Now, a new knowledge is acquired. Everytime I want something, I only need to let go of what I currently have and there will be no trouble. Is this true? . . .and we all have been children before and went through that process of knowledge acquisition. We also know that some values bring more palaver in exchanges than the one we released. So why do we continue to fall for the scam, are we not learning?

Conditioning. . .! There is a candyman along the way in every stage of our life journey. Let me cut this short and go to the point. In this age, media is that candyman. Programs on tv are studied for their psychological impact. Tv presenters are valued, celebrities are valued, superficiality is valued, immoral behavior is valued, impropriety is valued. . . so that we are programmed to abandon our natural cue for the weather and listen instead to the authoritative instructions of the weatherman. The weatherman tell us what to do, how to do it and when. The news anchor is forced onus to tell us what is happening and what it means and how it will affect us and what we are not supposed to do. . .as if we have no mind of our own! Then you get shows like "The Apprentice". . .once a week we are coached on how to behave at workplace and how to get over other people smartly and selfishly. Then they bring shows like the Osbournes and the Jerry Springers. . .and again we are shown how to curse other people and punch at each other and resolve domestic dispute by taking our dirty laundry into public view. Worse, the government allowed it and gave no regulation. So people listened and watched year after year as the candyman lures us further and further away from our innate values and dignity and replaced it with senseless dependencies to the point that today people cannot think critically on their own and stand firmly by what they believe without checking to make sure it is politically correct and approved. A dissaproval sometimes lead to lawsuit!

So here comes another candyman, Madoff. The threats in his business are there for them to see, the unfamiliarity is apparent but Suzie Orman, a fellow candywoman, is on nightly shows parading and pouring accolades and confidence in investments and how you cannot go wrong by throwing your money in there. So if the tv weather man said it will rain and it did and the tv newsman said we can fly now there is no more terrorists and it was true, then Madoff must be right about this return on investment and so they were suckered in. A new candyman is rearing its ugly head. . .internet!

Internet candymen - google, facebook, youtube, my space. . .etc, You all watch out!

Nice read!

Huxley,

Life is a transition. The meaning of life is tied on two ends and if you understand those two ends then you will understand the transition in between them.

1. Birth; 2. Death.

Do you understand these two ?

Here are some of the views that support my assertion:

1) He introduced the concept of hell, a particularly vile place for everlasting punishment.

2) Had particularly obnoxious family values - calling of people to hate their family members and abandon their families

3) He called on people to make no plans for tomorrow.

4) He call for people to not self-defend themself against aggressors, but instead give to aggressors

5) He called on people to self-mutilate to avoid sinning, thus showing that he did not know how "sinning" originate. He should have called on people to cut off their heads instead since sinning starts as a thought in the brain.

6) He was particularly opposed to his followers fraternising with non-Jews, describing one such as a dog.

7) He called on his enemies to be brought forth and slain before him.

8-) He said " I did not come to bring peace BUT a sword"

9) He was particularly uncharitable to women facing divorce from their men, describing them as commiting adultery and putting a bar against other men from marrying such women.

10) Was particularly materialistic, prefering that an expensive perfum be used on him, rather having it sold and the money given to the poor.


And this is the view one get from reading the new testament. I have not even mentioned the actions of Jesus in the old testament.


Does anyone who espouses such vile views deserve to be respected and renerated?

Huxley,

How confident are you that these claims are attributable directly to Jesus and he decreed these sentences, as opposed to evaluations of your sources and their credibility for cosmic truthfulness free of bias?

I am talking about the earlier nonsense that RichyBlack wrote that you attributed to me. Me and Richyblack are two divergent species when it comes to Economics

Oh, I take that back, it was in error. . .and yeah you were on my mind earlier today when I read some article on oil supplies in the Delta.

@post,

I am hearing that Jindall embellished the Sherriff Lee rescue story. Is this true?

Come on guys, stop bringing politics into the financial markets.

DOW falls for many reasons.

They plan to do a stress test on the banks - DOW falls

Sage of Omaha says that the economy is a shambles - DOW falls

The stimulus package is signed - DOW falls (because we buy the rumours and sell the news)

JPM announces that it is not going to pay out the expected dividends - DOW falls

Can a nikka catch a break?

DOW will keep falling till we find out whats in the books. Presently the banking sector is worth less that the soft drinks sector. It is still the same problem we have been having since July 2007 - false disclosure!

I still maintain that sacrificing Lehman Brothers to the pressure of the media created a lot of moral hazard which has perpetuated itself to present.

I thought this was you Ibime, . . .no?

4Play,

Human communication generally is like that.  If I respond to what I find wrong in your posts or anyone else's then I will diminish the pleasure of what I find great and nice about it.  That's why I never talk about what I find aggravating in other people posts.  It's philosophical.

lol, don't worry 4Play. . . you are not the only one. It's only a few people that do.

The fact is that the major packages announced so far are underwhelming

Quite honestly, I don't see government recovering all the money it sank into them so far and better to take them over now than later.  But then, the politics of it is scary. . .  if Wall street is good in the hands of Dems, it's equally good in hands of Reps.  Dems are discomforted in that possibility down the line.

It is still the same problem we have been having since July 2007 - false disclosure!

Ibime, Big turn around. I applaud your admission!

There is a trend here, each of the TARP recipient so far has been an Oliver Twist; asked for more. . .

You can only go to the well so many times before you are either turned back or the water dries up.  I know the well will not dry up but takeover of the companies is possible.  In contrast to that, and since America has never been down this path before. . .could business investors revolt against the government if they think a wipeout is imminent?  The constitution gives power to legislative branch for contingency if the executive is powerless, it does not accord any power to Judiciary to execute power, so who takes over from an ineffective legislative?  God forbid but could the military step in?

I know they are all freethinkers but which one of these people is an atheist, diests or agnostics? Freethinking is not exclusive of a divine acknowledgement. Freethinking is a step outside the box and away from social expectations and in essence a rebellion against its custodians, do not mislabel it as a denial for the existence of God. Freethinkers are seekers of truth, on a path to reconcile and merge their soul and purpose to the nature of being as designed and commanded for it by God and free of any influence from social designs authored by mankind.

rush teaching government policy? Please dont make me laugh here

Does he not? See. . .from the moment Bush made it public that he was giving stimulus bonus early last year to all Americans and to the time the disbursement happened, Rush was on radio coaching people not to spend their money as govt is asking them to do. He advised that reducing debt, saving the money, investing the money is all far better than taking it to the mall and going broke. I like that about him!

David you should listen to Rush for couple of weeks.

I agree with your statement that they continue to wrongly accuse him of what he is not.

You are on point!  Under excitement, I agree, Rush can be very dogmatic and over the line . . .but c'mon, which one of us is not?  I'd rather listen to EIB talk radio or Jazz and be informed and refreshed than poison my soul and aura with some noise marketer named "souljaboy tell 'em"!  Who is more anti-black, Rush teaching you government policies or superman singing about cranking ho's?  

This from Hauwa. . .

looks like kkk man

From Ibime . . .

the demise of this anti-people pro-corporation party.

Those racist bigots must never be allowed to hold power unless they change their evil ideology and become more welcoming to groups other than Southern whites racists!

No one ever labels the dems racist, kkk, anti-minority. . .but here you have the wizard of Senate, Harry Reid consulting and scheming with Blagojecvich to eliminate black candidates from an all-white senate cult. Dems see minorities as nothing more than a resource for winning ballots against Reps, when it comes to sharing space and power they'd rather smile in their face but stab their back in the dark of the night. Good for Reps, at least they tell you to your face and there is no pretense!

___________________________

republicans, negro-ntns, tayo d, kobojunkie et al . . . . .

loosers

Clap! Clap!!, Hoorrrraayyy! Hooraaayyyy!! Clap! Clap!!

My friend, go and siddon somewhere. Where is dems winning, point to their victory for me.

Following in his promise to run a transparent administration, President Obama's White House, starting tomorrow will start to give the public an update on where the recovery fund is going. Bookmark and use this site to get up to date info.


http://www.recovery.gov/

@Post,

At the end of the day government policies is affecting household units. Each household will have to determine which path is best for it in this recovery and follow that. Rush's message is always very conservative. In a time of economic crisis, that's what is needed; a conservative voice to reassure confidence and let people know that contrary to popular belief that it is American to live a splurged lifestyle, holding yourself back from unecessary consumption is just as American and patriotic. Rush is anti-establishment but he is household friendly.

He is not qualified to lead any party and Im glad he is not seeking such position for himself but nonetheless he is doing a darn good job advocating conservatism. What do the liberals have against him? They wrongly personify him as anti-minority and this to influence audience away from his show; the very messages that minorities need for awakening and social changes. You must wonder what alternatives the Liberals have for minorities - rap, hip-hop, celebrity gossip, reality shows, . . .stuffs that lead away from civic awareness and participation.

I love Rush and his message but I don't want him as a political leader.

@pastor AIO,

brother with all due respect,if you choose not to take side, then u aint welcomed here

On the fence or not, Tonye, I think you should invite Pastor back. You are going to need his contributions. . .trust me!

'cause people became too political correct and overwhelmed conversations with undue nitpicking. You write a post and no one respond to the subject but instead they bring out scopes to search for flaws; and trust me they find it!

Don't worry, everything has its time. . .this too shall pass!

One of the arguments against taking money to expand the unemployment insurance benefit is due to the welfare mentality. I mean, there are genuine needs but then you are bound to also see a whole lot of people abuse the subsidies and refuse to work or even search for gainful employment as long as they keep getting the unemployment benefits. Back in Clinton era, he reduced the benefits and created incentives in work programms to get people off welfare. At the moment there is no work incentive but care has to be taken also that government does not become a surrogate mother to people looking to sit idle for the next ten years; leaches that do nothing but watch Jerry Springer and soaps and play games on internet all day long, then stay up all night drinking alcohol.

Karma will yell at me again but i just gotta wonder whether you simply love to string meaningless words together with no regard for passing a message.

Lol, she doesn't yell at you when you see posts that have no meaning to you and you pass them by, does she? Why must you respond to my post if the message is unclear to you? I truly can't understand why that has to be a lesson. I am not here to teach. We all come here to interact, responsibly. When I run into posts I am not clear on I do one of two things; 1, ask for clarity; 2, pass by.

you're forgetting that a whole lot of those are moving straight to Afghanistan.

But again pls look at the portion i highlighted . . . what does it mean? There are less than 100,000 returning from the Iraq war most of whom wont come back until summer next yr so you expect unemployment to remain the same or worsen till then?

There, you know what to do afterall! Rather than answer I am going to choose a pass by.

One of the big problems in this recession was the freeze on the credit market, where would these loans you suggest come from if the government did not try to jumpstart both the lending sector and the broader economy? Do you people do anything other than repeat talking points?

Lol, Let me play your card. Who is "you people"? I don't understand your statement, you are not connecting. What exactly do you mean?

It's all about the mid-term election in 2010. Republicans are trying to lock Dems out of popularity in home base and Dems are trying to spread their influence through the grassroot network.

If pork allocations are fattened (and I suspect they will be through government lobbied contracting) while individual citizens continue to loose values of their personal worth, then there will be a moment of reflection and people come to grip with reality and dump rhetoric for can-do-politicians.

On the forecast for employment, there is a new angle. The President is bringing home thousands of US military from Iraq within the next 16months. It's going to be a surge in the unemployment market when they return and most of them leave service. Just so we should be alert, an Iraqi war veteran has priority for employment, which means that the more attritions we have from returning service men and women, then the longer ordinary citizens will stay unemployed.

Another factor, . . .infrastructures. . .I keep hearing the talk about construction as if everyone has that skill. First, the unskilled laborers that pour the concrete will more than likely be mexicans. The skilled positions will require licence and some trade or technical certifications. Well, people are going back to school to get MBA and Professional certifications, not learning how to pour concrete or grade a work site. The biggest recovery will be in private sector - services and professional occupations. Which means loans to upstart business or revitalize existing ones. Part of the recovery bill should have focused and invested more on cooperative banks, credit unions and small business assistance programs.

Negro, its easy to be "ranked top" when you state population is only 600,000 and you have plenty of free oil money pouring into state coffers. Rush Limbaugh would be ranked top too if he ran such a state.

Lmao, there is something with numbers lately.  You know what,. . .ehm, sorry Governor Palin, I can't defend that one!  I will be sure to pass your message to Rush so he can devote a whole day of spit-talk to you on EIB radio.  

Tayo,

I thought Louisiana is still under Federal Disaster Aid.  If that's true then you have an exception in Louisiana.  Under Federal Aid, depending on the extent, job loss is covered, capital loss is covered, business loss is covered. . .so in a way they have been under stimulus for a while.  Jindall is not facing a test as challenging as Arnold.  

Beside, I think Luoisiana has a lesson for the rest of the nation in terms of how it should recover from these problems.  What did Jindall do right?

David,

No, I won't say she is the best but amongst state executives, yes, she is ranked top. This was not known until very recently as we started hearing about the problems that individual states are in. I mean look at Cali for instance. I pray not, but assuming that situation continue to worsen, I won't be surprised to find Californians wishing to relocate for better prospects in Alaska. Don't you think so? We have to give credit where it's due.