₦airaland Forum

bawomolo:
According to the quoran, you and I are bound for that place

we wont be alone . . . .all the faithful and devout muslims will be with us

bawomolo:
Aren't they predominantly secular countries?

Is Nigeria a christian country? Are there No religionists in these secular countries? whats the connection between the happiness and atheism?

[quote author=Tudór link=topic=287843.msg4083743#msg4083743 date=1245873557]@Gen2genius
Your Sense has been beclouded by christianity. . .like tonyeb said where is your evidence that believers are much happier than atheists?
Atheist countries like holland, sweden and denmark have much more "happiness" than a religious country like nigeria. . .try and get your facts straight please.[/quote]Can this happiness be likened to atheism? are religionists not in these countries?

KAG:
Take it as whatever you want. You and I will know the truth of the matter, though. And, with that, I won't be responding to you until you've agreed to the conditions I set out and then started the thread with the questions you were so sure would be death of the theory of evolution. Take that for whatever you will as well.

please spare me of this ridiculous sermon and simply proceed to the thread and answer my questions.

huxley2:
We would do that when;

1) You stop prosletizing

This is ridiculous. If christians proselytize, what EXACTLY would u call what atheists have being doing on this forum?
You are equally guilty, thats if at all proselytizing is a crime. You have continuously revealed that the essence of ur posts is to make people "think" and become atheists.

2) You stop seeking to put your stinking religion into the public space

On the contrary, atheism STINKS and not christianity.
u are yet to produce an alternative to biblical assertions. neither have u produced intellectual or scientific evidences to support ur claims.
Atheism is based on irrationality, faith and mass delusion. Atheism stinks.

3) You stop mis-educating the general public

With due respect . . . .meaning NONE . . . . . .this refers to u and ur cohorts who are fond or coming up ridiculous and undefinable assertions.

bawomolo:
unrepentant about what?

about ur HELL bound status . . . .

nice one.

gen2genius:


Noetic, Whoever said the act was "undespicable"?

sorry I misunderstood ur point.

Chrisbenogor:
@noetic
Why is believing most important?

In what context is "believing" being used? what do u mean by believing?

tpiah:
can you explain how you'd rewrite that phrase in UFO language?

I believe the writer was a human being speaking a human language and writing for a human audience.

Well stated.


Why is this so hard to deduce?

toneyb:
Which part of the shameless copy paste did you refute?

I didnt have to. . . .since they did not come from the poster's brain.

bawomolo:
yes i'm ready with my baseball bat in hand.

no thief at night would surprise me

manmustwac:
How do you know jesus is coming? Please let me know where ugot the information from? And the time day month year where e go appear etc so i can be ready?

[quote author=Tudór link=topic=287937.msg4083413#msg4083413 date=1245869617]Bawomolo i'm definately with you on that one. . . .  [/quote]Pathetic and unrepentant . . . .

KAG:
Irony? Yeah, you just blew up my irony meter. I'm not waddling into an eleven-odd page thread to indulge you. It's simple, agree to the condition and start a new thread with your "pertinent questions".


*sigh*. Someone remind me why I do this again? I'm taking a break. Page me when you have agreed to the condition of the thread, etc.

should I take this to mean that u dont feel competent to address this questions?

gen2genius:
Here we are, acting like zombies and dummies. Has it not occurred to you that the western media will NEVER see anything good to publish about Africans? And instead of us to tell them to deal with the numerous anomalies in their societies - paedophiles roaming about the streets, young boys going on shooting and stabbing spree, young women drinking themselves to stupor and collapsing on the streets, celebrities who're anti-undies but pro-drugs, couples who marry today and divorce tomorrow, beastly fathers and mothers who imprison their own children in cellars and perform sex acts on them etc - we keep allowing them to brainwash us. Have they rid their society of all the atrocities being perpetrated on DAILY basis? So why won't they leave africans alone to deal with their own problems?

I am not saying what is being done to the young girls is excusable. The practice is worth decrying and denouncing. But you should ask yourself why the western media never sees anything good to say about Africa. Have you ever seen the picture of a healthy african child on their TV programmes? No way. It's ALWAYS the picture of a malnourished, maltreated child. Does it mean all that happens here is nothing but savagery and barbarism?

We must look into our problems but we must be wary if the announcement is coming from the western world. All they look out for is evil. Therefore, all they see is EVIL!

This is ridiculous. Another propaganda driven illiterate trying to justify the islamic malady on the basis of western media propaganda.

evil is evil and this act is despicable.

toneyb:
Didn't dalaman put them forth to you on the other thread? You promised to refute them but ended up disapointiing him despite his pleadings that he doen't want to wait in vain. What happened did you go through all the creationist websites and found nothing?

sorry I am lost. did u mean the SHAMELESS copy-paste from talk-origin?

KAG:
No, start a thread like you said you would, and agree to the simple, fair conditions set. It's not so difficult, and hey, who knows, you might be the one to falsify the theory of evolution.

Stop all this gimmicks. Just go to that thread and answer the questions. Then I can open a new thread for more. Dont be lazy!

Um, I didn't. You might want to read that again. Or you can just fall back on your classic line when flummoxed, shown wrong, etc. :"you didn't even answer my/the question". Your choice.

Ridiculous.

what was ur question again?

toneyb:
Please can you re-establish your lalala "scientific evidence"?

now u want to rob this in. . . . . I am still waiting for ur SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE . . . .I am sure mazaje has been looking for it, that y he is not online.

KAG:
This is ridiculous. You SHAMELESSLY refused to answer the poster's question. You SHAMELESSLY refused to define esensed's ontology.
I simply ignored u, cos the debate was meaningless.

You only posted in the thread to display a nihilant semantic skill. I am disappointed u could actually refer to this thread.

Yeah, funny you're the only one that feels that way. Oh look, it's the classic noetic line: you refused to answer the question. From you, the line has become a compliment. I like that thread. You should read it again because I believe it's thought-provoking.
This is DISGRACEFUL.

In The OP I asked for the Scientific and intellectual evidence that establishes the belief that God does not exists
Please read ur disgraceful response again, and see if u ATTEMPTED to answer or produce such evidence.

Tut, tut! Maybe you should read my responses again. There are only so many ways to answer a call for "proof" that a triangle is a square.
This is hilarious 

You meddled up all the issues of the post. You were neither objective nor did u answer my questions.
I eventually gave up on u cos u could not differentiate between a societal norm and custom (on one hand) and morality (on the other hand)?


Or not. Ooh, that's another thread I like. It was a clever one.

*sigh* When will I learn that fundamentalist Christians are never wrong, eh?

same old circle.

oyb:
What is the second letter of the English alphabet?

noetic's answer



well, that depends on which part of the bible you're reading . you must understand that the bible is a book of parables and no clear guidelines and subject to multiple interpretations

in the OT well, there was no english then - whats the second letter of the hebrew alpahabet?

_{penalty for not knowing - you get wiped out,}

in the NT - well er. . . whats the second letter of the greek alapahbet ?

sorry, the first letter of the latin alphabet?

the second letter is_ because Jesus read the english alphabet on the mount during. . .

no the second letter is because apostle Paul said so in_____

and so on and so forth.

nice try.

toneyb:
Established? . Is that what you call established? Next time you will come and tell us that you have established that stars really fought along side yahweh's men in battles. what a ridiculous blow hard.

You are such a joker. keep muddling everything up.

muhsin:
@Jarus,

I didn't know my thread could have such a regard. Thanks so much.

Well, regarding noetic2's request as well as yours, [b]I don't think that should be the case as some Hadeeths' themes are rather self-explanatory and thus can be easily understood. More-over, the task would certainly mean too much upon me to be accomplished as I have, almost always, lots to do on the net. [/b]What I think should be the case is; the door is OPEN for any reader to ask of anything he/she seems to have partial or not grasped. And God's willing the thing his/her question would be attended to.

May Allah (S.W.T) guide us, ameen.

This is a dishonest attempt not to clarify the GREY areas of the haddith whenever u raise them.

KAG:
Oop's, while there was no rain before around 4004 BCE - because that's when the Earth and the universe were created, don't you know - the date I should have mentioned was 2348 b.c.e which is when the flood occurred. *wink* *wink* *nudge nudge*. Well, that's if you're one of those Biblical literalists. Using Ussher's very literal reading of the Bible, and juxtaposing it with the bizarre claim that there was no rain before the mythical flood gives us no rain before 2348 B.C.E.

absolute Rubbish.

The OP they did not believe cos they saw no rain. . . . .how does this imply that they saw no rain for 4004 BC? did u bother to ask the OP?

They saw no rain coming, between the time of noah's preaching and the eventual flood. is that too hard to deduce?

toneyb:
It is written in the bible unless if you don't believe the bible any more.

Is this an excuse to LIE on me. lying is very bad.

[quote author=Tudór link=topic=287937.msg4082311#msg4082311 date=1245857358]Noetic I'm no geologist but your evidences for the flood were dismissed in numerous threads. . .[/quote]by who?

I love this thread u resurrected.


DID U ANSWER MY QUESTIONS ON THAT THREAD?

I find it very very convenient to ignore u, when u STOP making sense. You can however return to this thread to answer my questions.

KAG:
Hey, just in case you missed it the last few times it appeared:

start a thread with those "pertinent questions" and time willing, I'll participate. The conditions were and still are: "Don't duck out of questions when I ask them in return, and don't try to simply handwave away any of my responses - basically, engage actively with the contents of any potential responses. I'll also promise to do the same. Deal?"



Anyway, so much for taking up the challenge, eh?

That's a good point. Although, I see he disputes that he believes that. We'll see.

what stops u from answering the evolution related questions on that thread? u want me to embark on another fruitless journey with u?

just start by answering those questions.

With all due respect - meaning none, I guess - you're not a very bright lad. Look up the other meanings of "poser" and you'll know why it serves as an excellent pun for what you do.

So why did u ignorantly imply initially that they could not mean the same thing? This is annoying.

KAG:
There's here, for example:
https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria?topic=284043.msg4040168#msg4040168

This is ridiculous. You SHAMELESSLY refused to answer the poster's question. You SHAMELESSLY refused to define esensed's ontology.
I simply ignored u, cos the debate was meaningless.

You only posted in the thread to display a nihilant semantic skill. I am disappointed u could actually refer to this thread.

and here:
https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria?topic=277635.msg3973257#msg3973257
Same thread earlier response:
https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria?topic=277635.msg3953076#msg3953076

This is DISGRACEFUL.

In The OP I asked for the Scientific and intellectual evidence that establishes the belief that God does not exists
Please read ur disgraceful response again, and see if u ATTEMPTED to answer or produce such evidence.

Oh, look, a whole thread's worth:
https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-259004.0.html

This is hilarious 

You meddled up all the issues of the post. You were neither objective nor did u answer my questions.
I eventually gave up on u cos u could not differentiate between a societal norm and custom (on one hand) and morality (on the other hand)?

Please resurrect or, at the very least, provide links to those threads. Thank you.

You can start from the threads u raised to return there and objectively answer my questions. . . .This is hilarious 

[quote author=Tudór link=topic=287937.msg4082232#msg4082232 date=1245856731]How many times will they tell you that noah's flood is all one big LIE?[/quote]How many times have it been established that this flood indeed took place.

jagunlabi:
Hell will be fun,noetic.It can never be worse than spending an eternity kissing the butt of Mr yahweh the butcher god and his son(or is it himself?), jesus.

Nope, again u are wrong. u would only be in hell with satan.

KAG:
Oh dear! Just in case there were any doubt in my mind about your parsing abilities, eh? I was talking about this: "The people never saw rain so disbelieved him. The rest is history"

You know, the one where the [b]OP implied there was no rain before approximately 4004 BCE; [/b]and it's history.

This is exactly what I meant by running in circle. How did u deduce that there was no rain for 4004 BCE?

KAG is at it again!

Aprilmay:
Ok,im 20 something and i have Never had a serious boyfriend,and usually im ok with dis fact,but weeks ago its just kinda hitting me hard,even my tomboy girlfriend has 2 serious boyfriends,i mean where does dat leave me at? Dont get me wrong i get toasters all d time but im d unserious chick who guys all think as a friend not d girlfriend.Im just tired of dis fact bothering me,becos its like wat d hell is wrong wit me?

so pls comment and feel free to share any advise on how guys can start taking me serious instead of seeing me as just a friend

There are only two reasons why a guy would see u as a friend and not as a girl friend material.

1. u are not attractive enough: This maybe due to ur care-free approach to simple girls manners including dress sense and natural femininity.

2. u are too familiar/close with these guys: No matter how much a guy likes u, he might get worried about the fact that he readily sees u too often or knows too much interpersonal stuffs about u.

If none of the two applies to u, then I think u are cool, u just need to tell ur next toaster (who u fancy) what EXACTLY u want from him in a rel.

who guys all think as a friend not d girlfriend

I hope this does not mean u have been a having sex with these "friends"? None of my business. But if u have, u should forget having a boyfriend for a long time, in ur own interest.