Ooman's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ooman's Profile › Ooman's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 (of 137 pages)
Ihedinobi: Yeah, me too.you both are suffering from insanity in its concentrated form! |
tobechi20: after one minute in hell,they know heaven is real,they wil bliv in God.no longer be atheistdumb |
blink182: She has clearly made her choice.yea, a great choice |
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOD IS SO DUMB |
anonymoux: abeg explain wetin you mean for there.... I never said "your creator" I said God has only one meanin, and it means MY CREATOR?he meant that. WHEN YOU DIE, YOUR CREATOR DIES WITH YOU. since the only reason your creator exists is because YOU exist. |
follow eckankar |
Reyginus: This is next. That is, after we're done with order and design.what do you have problem with on that? |
Reyginus: Lol. And the sensible thing to do is to add to the waste? These atheists sef!why are you stalking me? |
Teen superstar Miley Cyrus is in hot water with her Christian fans after using Twitter to post an inspirational quote by theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss. The poetic quote is a favorite among free thinkers and atheists, and points out that we are all made of stardust. The quote ends by proclaiming: “So, forget Jesus. The stars died so that you could be here today.” Cyrus made the now infamous tweet Thursday afternoon. The tweet links to a picture of Krauss speaking, with the following inspirational text superimposed on the image: “Every atom in your body came from a star that exploded. And, the atoms in your left hand probably came from a different star than your right hand. It really is the most poetic thing I know about physics: You are all stardust. You couldn’t be here if stars hadn’t exploded, because the elements - the carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, iron, all the things that matter for evolution and for life - weren’t created at the beginning of time. They were created in the nuclear furnaces of stars, and the only way for them to get into your body is if those stars were kind enough to explode. So, forget Jesus. The stars died so that you could be here today.” The tweet has already angered many Christians, and pleased many atheists and free thinkers. THE GOOD SOURCE
|
[size=15pt]pointlessness and senselessness. waste of nairaland space[/size] |
Reyginus: Lolol. Where have I ascribed it to God in this thread?well that was what i meant, take it or leave it |
Reyginus: ooman, this is easy to understand. The moment you subscribe to repetitive patterns in nature, you are attesting to a particular order of these patterns. This is because, once anything occurs repetitively, it follows a cycle, which is similar from the previous one. When it doesn't follow this order, it is no longer repeting.no. my point is that God is not involved. |
anonymoux: like i said, earlier, whats the point? you will not believe meLMAO you really want me to believe the sh.it you wrote above?? NOT EVEN THE XTIANS WILL BELIEVE YOU. |
anonymoux: God is very simple.... It is impossible for God to give you a commandment.TOTAL AND COMPLETE NONSENSE. SMH FOR WHOEVER INSANE HUMAN WROTE THE ABOVE |
anonymoux: Because, they don't know the truth about God....what is the truth about God? |
Ihedinobi: I guess that quote is an excerpt from one of those encyclopedias driving you nuts. Ok. If it is, then you're quite the copycat, my friend. That quote is pretty much verbatim what you guys have been hooting here and what I've been asking for is some explanation that makes sense for how omniscience cancels out free will. Do you think that you can produce the argument alluded to in that quote? It would confirm the need to peruse the link.SMH
|
anonymoux: When una see power wey pass una own na just to wave am be the next rightdelusions |
[size=15pt] |
[size=15pt]silence is the best answer for christians[/size] |
Ihedinobi: Well, if you don't trust the Book, you shouldn't hinge your argument on its authority, should you? That only shows how desperate your position is. In other words, by questioning the authority of the Bible, you have essentially nullified any argument you hinged on it.you are so empty that you are confused by your own imaginations |
anonymoux: No be you say you won prove God no exist? Bros why you dey run naguy, go see a doctor. you need help with your dreams |
Ihedinobi: Ha! We're not contending over the meaning of omniscience, Lb2, we're contending over whether or not omniscience nullifies free will. You just said that the Bible says that it does and I answered that it didn't since it still confers a burden of choice on us.THEN ITS THE BIBLE CONTRADICTING ITSELF. FIRST IT SAYS YOU HAVE A CHOICE, THEN IT SAYS YOU DONT, GOD KNOWS IT ALL. YET YOU BELIEVE SUCH A DUMB BOOK ![]() NA WA OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO |
THIS SHOULD BE IN THE JOKE SECTION SMH FOR THE OP. GO SEE A DOCTOR IMMEDIATELY. YOU ARE SUFFERING FROM PSYCHOSIS |
[quote author=dotcom_na_me_na_me]And to hell with your encyclopedias of philosophy! Na by force to join blind and brainwashed group We force you to convert from your disbelieve [/quote]who be this?? ![]() |
anonymoux: point of correction... i dont worship my creator and God has only one meaning like I said earlier...Some people also believe that Zeus made them. Your believe does not matter here. |
Ihedinobi: Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD.IF GOD IS OMNISCIENT, THEN HE WOULD KNOW WHAT CHOICES EACH WOULD MAKE. FAILURE TO KNOW DENY HIM OF OMNISCIENCE MY BIBLE VERSE REMAINS VALID. YOURS NULLIFIED |
Ihedinobi: Ah, so your new argument is that the Bible says so. Ok o. There is a counter-argument that holds that the Bible says no such thing. I hope you're prepared to take it on.where is the counter-argument to my bible verse? |
[quote author=inspiredbyGOD:.]A true Christian (someone who TRULY follows the teachings of Yeshua) wouldn't have run away in the first place. Yes God won't make such a person confess but his love for God would make him confess.[/quote]delusions of grandeur |
[quote author=inspiredbyGOD:.]Let's assume it happens in Nigeria (the land of corruption) and not in any developed country.[/quote]then your scruple comes in if you were an atheist, if you were a xtian, no God would make you confess too, remeber that we have freewill. Atheism depends on evidence, xtians depend on faith. |
[quote author=inspiredbyGOD:.]let's assume someone was accidentaly knocked down by a car, the person sustains life threatening injuries from the accident. The driver of the car speeds away from the scene but the car's number plate is captured on a phone's camera (just the car, no way to determine the driver). The authorities trace the car to the owner, arrest him and he is sued by the victim of the accident. The owner tries to explain in futility that he was not the one driving the car but his friend whom he lent, the authorities won't hear any of that since he has no proof that he lent his friend. The innocent man is pronounced guilty and is made to pay a hefty fine. The guilty one continues living his life (afterall the evidence didn't point to him). Although he commited the crime, he refused to pay the price for his crime (afterall all he lost was just a foolish friend). My question again, what exactly stops an atheist from lying?[/quote]forensics, genetic analysis and other techniques now developed will reveal the truth. and even if he was a xtian. exactly what would God make him do, make him easily confess to murder? wake up, no one will confess. Forensics is your answer |
greatgenius: lol where does the darkness disappear to?.your village?.. the light has only "covered" the darkness. take away the light and the darkness will be right there where it was in the first place.the darkness went no where. it only "miraculously disappeared" ..think god brother think..Gush, you lack of intelligence is not disappointing. Its typical of xtians |
[quote author=inspiredbyGOD:.]let's assume someone was accidentaly knocked down by a car, the person sustains life threatening injuries from the accident. The driver of the car speeds away from the scene but the car's number plate is captured on a phone's camera (just the car, no way to determine the driver). The authorities trace the car to the owner, arrest him and he is sued by the victim of the accident. The owner tries to explain in futility that he was not the one driving the car but his friend whom he lent, the authorities won't hear any of that since he has no proof that he lent his friend. The innocent man is pronounced guilty and is made to pay a hefty fine. The guilty one continues living his life (afterall the evidence didn't point to him). Although he commited the crime, he refused to pay the price for his crime (afterall all he lost was just a foolish friend). My question again, what exactly stops an atheist from lying?[/quote]this is why we have forensics now. read and learn guy |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 (of 137 pages)


Rubbish!!!