₦airaland Forum

cococandy:
Lol lol lol. you were caught fair and square.

Truth is that I don't disagree with you. A woman is supposed to support her husband in any area that he needs support. That's what partnership is all about. Else who needs to get married if not that two hands are easier than one?

But you fail to agree that a man should support his wife in her duties and at anytime that she needs support. Which is what makes us different.

Your approach is selfish and gives the impression that marriage is all centered on the man; what he wants & desires and his convenience.

You still misunderstand me. A man ought to assist his wife if she needs his help in even domestic chores. There's nothing wrong with that.

However, she must call for such help when she's genuinely in need of it and not out of laziness. And knows that it is his prerogative to object or accept.

shaybebaby:
The christianity you practice in Africa was cobbled together in Europe. Go do some research on how the book you live your life by came to be.

Still rather have my minge pummelled by him than an animal like you. Why you hating eh? Bad Belle.
Is it because he fine pass you? Go on, I dare you to prove your envy by denying that he fiiiiiiiine.

How I reach my orgasms is now intellectual discourse abi?


You are still a fookin Cvntwaffle.

You have nothing to teach about Christianity and how the books were numbered. Does that make Christianity a whiteman's religion? Anything to save your shabby intellect.



You must be high on some crack called delusions. Don't make me insult a whole race because your twisted sense of what fine is.

And spare your man from my diatribes. One more comparison between us, then I'll tear him to shreds and tell you why the black man is the sex god sent to save women from dying sexually unfulfilled.

Nonsense!

ststyreal:
Mr permissiveness, and what happens after you must have learnt of the numerous guys she had slept with? Your level of reasoning is too rigid, learn to loosen up a bit. You are taking life too serious, relax! there is nothing in this world, including the marriage you are killing your self over because all is vanity. Learn to accept people for who they are and remember, we are all humans and as such prone to mistakes, if you love someone, love them for who they are including their past and not to make them feel worthless becos of their past. Remember the prostitute that ran to Jesus when the Jews were about stoning her for her sins? Can you also remember what Jesus asked the Jews, which saw all of them dropping their stones and leaving. Jesus simply told the woman saying," neither do I condemned you, go and sin no more". Jesus wasn't interested in her sins but her turning a new leaf, and i believe that should be paramount in any relationship we are into. Forgiveness of sins including the past and helping your partner to becoming a better person u want him or her to be. Now my question, what do you need her past for after marriage?

Ah ah!!! Okay. I've heard you. Take it easy, will you?

I admire the way you put down your points without falling into the temptation to be rude.

Kudos then. But you're an alternate. What's your real handle? I might need it so when next we cross, I'll remember your good grace and return the favour.

shaybebaby:
Even the English we are speaking abi na type sef, who dash us?
The religion they are using to justify "africaness" and morality, who dash them?
We know who the real sheeple are.
If they really want to reject western ways, drop the English language to start with and the Bible, no need to worry that there are power cuts, na darkness we dey before oyinbo man come.
And for anyone that wants to return to the motherland, abeg begin trek or enter canoe as per old school tradition.

I never saw this, I would have put a virtual handcuff on your wrist so you type no further and spare humanity your grotesque ignorance.

England wasn't even the first country where English was spoken. It was Denmark according to some sources. Neither is English the original language of the British. English is a borrowed language from several other languages, some as a result of colonisation.

Is Christianity the whiteman's religion? Or because the whiteman brought Christianity to Africa, that makes it his? Hmmmmm. Intellectual slavery!!!

And of course to you technology is the whiteman's invention? Yeh kpa!!!

Little wonder you see the white man as a god. You remind me of the movie 50 shades of gray.

You must have spreaded your legs as wide as the East is from the West to have him drive you like a black slave, while you moan in foolish ignorance that you were been pummelled by a god.

You need intellectual rehab.

shaybebaby:
Bellend.

That's the name of your history teacher, who didn't put in extra work to mentally emancipate you from slavery.

cococandy:
So obviously you have nothing against women working. you have no case against feminists then.not that feminism is about gender roles anyway.I'm Just following your own logic.

If you're a strict adherent of gender roles, then you probably shouldn't be cool with woman labor.
But no you don't have problems with that.
Funny how feminist haters only remember gender roles when the topic is about a man doing feminine duties but have no problems with women helping the man in his duties.

And we are the ones who want to eat our cakes and have it?

You weaved your Web very well but I still remain uncaught.

A woman can not be idle. Yet working not because her husband needs her financial input is my key point. Women have always worked as far as recorded history is concerned. They've always engaged in light farming and weaving.

The problem with the modern woman is that her work interferes with her traditional role. And this I detest. There are few works that dont.

A woman is to assist her husband in any capacity he may require. And if he requires her financial assistance, well that's for the two of them.

shaybebaby:
Cvntwaffle.

Observing your love for vulgarism and lasviciousness, I can't help wonder if your muff has been icecold and abandoned or the winter-struck, flaccid dick that services you needs the African weather to do his job.

joseph1832:
Then please enlighten me about the works of Jesus, make a believer outta me. Lol.

And yea, if Jesus isn't against war, how come He told Barabas to "love thy enemies" eh?

I don't know of any scripture where CHRIST told "Barabas" to love his enemies.

shaybebaby:
Pvssy.

You wrote that to see my reaction, didn't you? You test me, woman of little decorum. I won't be the one to blame when I start throwing my diatribes at you.

cococandy:
What about the one who works to support her husband. Unlucky?
Do you agree with women working to support their families?

One of the qualities of a virtuous woman is not being idle. So a woman ought to work. But the ideal situation is that her work shouldn't interfere with raising her young infant. And her work doesn't take first place before her husband.

Yes, the one who works to support her husband because they desperately need her contribution will have more pressures and emotional stress to deal with that a woman who works otherwise.

cococandy:
What kind of gender roles? Like women not bringing money to the family?

A woman who works not out of the need for money to support her husband but to keep body and soul fit is a lucky woman.

shaybebaby:
which one?
That you can lie? re: you have met all the feminists on the planet. Chimanada sef, you don meet?

That stones are more useful? are you asserting that gems are? examples pls.

That you talk out of your arse? Go back and read your posts.

While I enjoy provoking a stubborn woman and dragging her helplessly to her wit's end, I'm poorly conditioned to tolerate a rude and uncultured one. Especially one who has lost her sense of origin and uniqueness.

[quote author=shaybebaby post=45378227][/quote]You decided to quote me after all. I saw you shadow boxing but decided to wait for you to come into the ring properly. I knew you'd come. And come you did.

Oh, don't mind my typos, android does most of my spellings and I don't bother to cross check. It's a real time typing debate, proof reading has little use for me. Though I appreciate your pointing it out.

What you wrote up there in reaction to my post, is..., what do I call it....? An inconsequential attempt at rebuffing a superior submission.

cococandy:
If both genders aren't equal, then one must be superior. I don't get people who say they don't support equality yet won't agree that they consider one gender superior.

It's simple English na. Is the English I speak different from the one others do?

Both genders are equal in basic fundamental rights. Like right to education, freedom, security free speech, you name it.

But there are roles; gender specific roles. And this is where the problem is. And this is what the feminists want to obliterate by all means yet they want men to consider their weakness. They simply want their cakes back.

cococandy:
Of course I'll be grateful to him if that should happen. Although I must make it clear that I in no way expect him to play the hero and risk his life for me. I'd rather we both sit tight and comply with whatever the assailant wants than one or both of us die over it.

Thing is you generalized over women not being grateful as per wars fought in the past and I replied via same generalization.
You didn't make room for individual cases where things might be different.

Now If we are to consider ourselves inferior and not claim equality to men because you guys supposedly do things we can't do like fight wars, doesn't it follow that guys too should be considered inferior for not being able to do some of the things we can do?

Each gender is different and uniquely so. None is superior to the other. Hence the fight for equality.

Gosh I can't believe I'm going into the diatribe again.

Okay bye.

I've never said women are inferior. Truth is they're not. But the definition of the equality they seek is madness. The equality they seek has no gender consideration. And as a result is not attainable.

You want 50% of top executive positions in banks and all the other top blue chip firms, but no one gets to hear them feminists say the women in war fronts are almost nonexistent.

When you hear the scream of a rape victim in a dark alley, you know she's physically vulnerable as a woman, you try to come to her aid. This is gender equity not equality.

When you see a pregnant woman in a train or bus standing or in a long bank queue, courtesy demands you assist her. This is gender equity or consideration, not equality.

The examples go on.

Gender equality means there are no gender roles in the society. So it favours women to talk about gender equity. Women won't survive a society where men see them as equals in certain regards.


I know so many women who drive their own cars but can't change a flat tyre. That's just a perfect illustration of feminism.

freecocoa:
It's a battle(as suggested by you), you are loosing and all you can talk about is being content with "few" positivity blah blah and more blah.

Of what use is this your positively different jargon, if you can't achieve anything with it?(since you will obviously be a minority).

Yes, stones are more in numbers than gems.

freecocoa:
Swayed by fad you say? Why the hypocrisy? Many people castigating feminism and every supposed new fad you claim, are in the white man's country, using their new technologies, their new ideas, religion, down to their food, all to better your lives, yet I and the ones who don't agree with you that an adult should be able to choose how to live, are the ones following new fads? Really?

You must be joking!!! Please tell me you're joking! White man's what? The first white nation that ever rose to world hegemony is Rome. Before that, the Arabs and Asians held sway. And there was technology and innovation at the time. There was science and mathematics. Like everyone else, the white man learned and burrowed technology and knowledge from others.
The white man burrowed Christianity too.

But that's not the problem, the problem is having the soundness of mind to know what to adopt and know what to reject. Like I said, as far as morality goes, the whiteman has a lot to learn.

You're among those who erroneously mistake technology to mean Westernization.There are two different things. Westernization is an ideology, a concept and belief. Technology is science and innovation. The later is not the property of the whiteman.

freecocoa:
And I take it you have met every feminist and have proven that they are miserable because they are feminists.

You my friend, I tire for.

Yes I have! They're all miserable discontented, greedy bunch. I've never seen a greedy person ever being satisfied. An unsatisfied man is a restless, unhappy man. That's the life of a feminist.

cococandy:
Oh I see what you mean.

Well who caused these wars to start with?
You can't start wars and expect us to be grateful you fought them. (Not that we aren't.)

But on what leg will men stand on to accuse us of ingratitude for the wars they fought when most of the wars were caused by their greed,covetousness and lust for power, other men's lands/property and wives. On this your point, I think men owe the world an apology for most of the wars ever fought.

It's the height of conceit to think that we owe you guys gratitude for them.

Even though we are because we are nice like that.

My opinion

Your point sound reasonable and sophisticated but, I'm sorry it has no bearing to truth and reality.

A good example is this. Daddy is home with you and mommy. And there's a greedy covetous armed robber who broke into the home at night, but daddy was apt and swift to knock him off his balls. Will you tell daddy that you won't be grateful for his intervention and protection because the assailant was a man?

There would always be an aggressor. There will always be a threat to peace and security and men who risk their lives selflessly to preserve their society deserve a heros' gratitude for all time.

The world has been deceived to think this peace will last forever. But a time of war and chaos and total disorder is approaching. Driven by famine, severe hunger, lawlessness and greed. And men will be highly sought after to defend their homes and community.

freecocoa:
Okay, you are doing a wonderful job so far, although I'd like to think that, if your version was what is 'good', then evil should not triumph over it.

So far, it seems evil is winning and all you can do is sit there and type what you do, okay na.

The few that would see the light and embrace it is worth all the troubles. Quality isn't about numbers. It's about uniqueness and standing out positively different. Never going with the crowd who always are swayed by every new fad.

Now the question been asked in the climes where feminism has gained momentum is; was it all worth it? At what cost?


You don't cheat nature without paying a terrible price. I've never seen a feminist whose life isn't plagued by bitterness and grudges.

freecocoa:
The sheer 'ludictousness' of it all.

Since you know this, what are you doing arguing with me? Are you trying to change me into a real woman? Its been proven beyond all reasonable doubt that I can never be real, just what is the point?

There's hope in trying. Even if not for your sake, but for the sake of others that may come across you in person or the write up you left here, that they may stand firm and resist the evil storm that took you off.

bukatyne:
buka (as in amala joint) and tyne (tin)

Hehehehehehehehehe

@Postmann:

Please let me know when it is time to vote for mimzy.

I'm grateful!!! Very grateful!!! Thank you so much!!! I owe you, dear Bukatyne!

freecocoa:
I swear it niggah, you have zero intelligence, zero.

The true definition of a dumbo, is a woman who rejects her gender identity. A woman who failed to separate TV programmes and fictional novels from reality. You have replaced your mother's sound advice for Western movies, Angelina and Co have exchanged your poorly guarded soul for their vain purpose. You're just another African casualty of Westernised brainwashing.

Though you live in the 21st century, your mental development is trapped in the pre-historical era of Eve. By greed and lust, you've been shortchanged.

When you're open to every new concept and you see your gender as a hindrance to your ambition, then you're nothing but a man-eater, an angry woman full of self hate.

The real women are in their homes, having sweet pillow fights with their men and enjoying the warmth of a nice family, but you're one restless strom driven from its main target and you roam endlessly looking for another excuse why it is the fault of man.

joseph1832:
LOL. I'm sure you know Jesus never threw a single punch, yet he defeated the greatest tyrant of all... And I'm sure you know who that is.

But still, freedom always come with a price.

You confused the works of JESUS with the need for physical freedom. But let me tell you this;

Israel as a nation has one more major battle to fight. It's a physical battle. And CHRIST on HIS second coming will be part of that battle.

CHRIST is not against war.

freecocoa:
I actually am, so best be careful.

You and I never had anything to be done with in the first place, hence, stop mentioning me.

As we type on, your letters are making a perfect picture of your true values and personality.

For some feminists, there's this this disorder and illusion of being a man trapped in a woman's body. This type of feminists believe they can engage a man even in physical combat. You sound like that type.

We live in the age of pretence where physical might bows to mental prowess, but should we engage in the former, you'd need an expert surgeon to reconstruct your battered face.

Wherever you lost your feminity, retrace your steps and see if you could find it back. When you do, you'll know happiness.

cococandy:
Dodge ball.

I think your curiosity is genuine. Well, lemme give you a tip of what I meant by feminists have little sense of gratitude.

For every civilization that survived; for every village boundary that exists; for every culture and freedom that persists have been paid for and sustained by the blood of men. Men who fought and lost their lives to ward off tyrants that their generation and lineage will survive. And now that there is relative peace, some greedy, ungrateful thieves who call themselves feminists, who didn't have a sense of history to know on what foundation stood this peace are claiming equality and spewing gender trash.
But should Cameroon invade Nigeria now, it is the men that will answer the call to duty to preserve their father's land from aggression while the feminists will sit back and wait for a time of peace to spew some gender trash.


Now you've been served.

freecocoa:
Ogbeni stop spamming my mentions.

I thought we are done? My tank hasn't even gone one-tenth. And what's Ogbeni, by the way? You sound crude.
You must be used to street fighting.

cococandy:
Don't let me pass. Just answer the question.
I wonder why you're on the defensive like this.
It's just a simple matter of clarifying what you mean in a short precise post.

Not like those long term-paper posts.

When I say no, now is not the time, that's exactly what I mean. I'll answer that later.

cococandy:
Not joining things with anyone.
I've just been following the thread and your comment about gratitude seemed off.

Was wondering what special thing feminists aren't grateful for. And what gratitude has to do with the topic. if you could kindly explain.

I would have. But freecocoa doesn't deserve to have my explanation. During the course of this thread, I might or in subsequent pertinent thread.

cococandy:
Thought as much

My question has been answered. You re distinct from freecocoa. And that means you have come to join hands with her.

But I'll let you pass. Now's not the time.

cococandy:
Thought as much

Have you come to join hands with your friend against me or is freecocoa your alternate?

lezz:
So you have inadvertently agreed that the notion of feminism is as baseless as mere assertions without truths!!! Thank you.

And since men and women aren't equal and will never be in equal in responsibility and leadership, why not save yourself the burden of proving the absurd.

Because you cococ.andy don't even want a man who is your equal!!!

Freecocoa not cocandy.

freecocoa:
Your case is on a whole nother level, Oboy free me abeg.

I have little time for pretence with feminists. No time for circumspection. I tell you like it is.

cococandy:
Gratitude for what? If you don't mind me asking.
Before you go off, na only question I ask o please. Just keep the answer simple . Thank you.

You shouldn't be interested in my answer. Moreover, you lack that unrivalled feminine grace and humility that would have made me attend to your curiosity.

freecocoa:
I can't explain it, and you are right about feminists being all the above and more, now waka.

Your stamina disappoints me.

freecocoa:
Lol, a bigot too, like I didn't know that already.

Thank you for the perfect profiling, your price awaits you at the bank, okpo.

Now someone please tell me, is this the high profile, intelligent freecocoa who engages men in a lengthy intellectual discourse? How did she veer into savagery and uncouthness?

I've only just begun. I'll drink to my fill from your tears of anguish