SOZINN's Posts
Nairaland Forum › SOZINN's Profile › SOZINN's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (of 77 pages)
oyaskii:Oga they are milking it, how you don't see this is what I don't know. Even in the time of Harry Potter, when he witnessed Tom Riddle come back to life after his experience with the goblet of fire, the installments that followed were just there to extend the whole story till they finally killed Tom Riddle off. But the difference between then and now is that back then they had an actual plot and a villain everyone wanted to see dead but didn't know how it would be achieved. Tom Riddle was everything, posed a real threat to our favorite characters and actually caused Harry to loose people (important people). He shook the wizarding world without even trying and built up the emotions in the hearts of the audience and everyone wanted to get revenge. Then you go ahead and start Fantastic beasts with this guy. They really tried in making this guy to be different from Tom but the end result is someone who is nowhere near as terrifying as Tom. I watched the first installment in 2016 and I missed the second in 2018, but before I watched the most recent one I went back and saved all three of them just so that I will understand what these people are doing here. In the first film we get introduced to Gellert Grindewald, he gets exposed and arrested. Chapter two he escapes and it's just fluff all through. Chapter three he gets resolved of all his crimes and we start again, only for him to be exposed in the end like he was in the first installment, this time he escapes leaving all his followers behind. The fourth one is not here but I'll tell you what happens. They will go after him with Albus Dumbledore leading the chase, then it's fluff all through and they won't end him. Everybody will come back for chapter five. You think fans are buying this bullshît and it has a 47% score on rotten tomatoes. It can only go down from here, very soon they will be competing with fast and furious in low ratings. ![]() |
Watching fantastic beasts 3. JK Rowling trying to milk this franchise with Grindewald like how she did in the harry potter series with Tom Riddle. Oh fùck |
Believe me when I say that nonsense posts like this deceive women more than they deceive men. If it's that easy for them to get any man they want why are so many of them in the church crying. In their youth they get so many male attention that they think men will stick around till when they decide to get married. Only to wake up one morning and voom, all the men have disappeared. ![]()
|
Baddestguyp:It seems this show has been released three times, in 2012, 2014 and 2022. Each of them season 1, season 1, season 1. The creators dey smoke ![]() |
The Lost City 2022 Excellent acting and casting. Although this is not one of Brad Pitt's, Sandra Bullock's, Daniel Radcliffe's, or Channing Tatum's best performances, the film itself is not overly demanding, and they put in just enough effort for the audience to enjoy it. It was widely assumed that this movie was a rip-off of the 2021 Jungle Cruise. Both films, in my opinion, are more dissimilar than most people realize or care to admit. The film stays loyal to its genre and is an entertaining experience. Great usage of CGI, which greatly contributed in the building of the film's environment and breath taking action sequences. Although the plot was predictable and unoriginal, it had a good pace and fewer plot flaws than many other films I've seen this year. When things started to grow dull, the comedy was right on point and just enough to crack ribs or at least make me giggle. Overall, it was a fun action/adventure film that could appeal to anyone. It met my personal expectations. Given the status of Hollywood movies and the genre, I had no unrealistically high preconceptions. Before I started watching, I had a good idea of how the movie would feel. By my standards, a solid seven. They did a good job because not many blockbuster movies in this category make it above mediocre. |
![]()
|
DrDax:Honestly where are all of you crawling out from It's my opinion, please rest. Or better still post your own. |
Baddestguyp:The Multiverse = endless possibilities And once you have introduced it to your story you have to be very careful because it's easy to mess everything up. Ask DC and their most popular shows on the CW. |
IbrahimMav:Clam down fan boy, you are just getting worked up over nothing. I made a mistake and I admit it. I never claimed to be an expert or whatever, so I don't know where all the genius name calling is coming from. I just google movies, watch and leave a review. It's not a job and I'm not a professional OK. I google the film and I thought it was full blown science fiction/adventure and I reviewed it as such. Even at that I still gave it a 5. I saw reviews where it was given a three or four or there about. In my reviews I try to tackle all the elements in a movie as much as I can and I try to be fair. Others give low ratings below 4 or whatever without any valid reason, I don't see you crying under their posts. I just try to say why I'm giving it a particular score. If you love the movie so much why didn't you write your own review and profess your undying love Oh and about my reviews filling the whole place, bro, they will keep coming. If you don't like it feel free to skip or type long bullshît and be a clown in my mentions I don't give a fùck. And if this is your way of seeking attention, honestly, you no reach. I'm just replying because this is the first time I'm coming across your mention. You as a person like from head to toe, you are not relevant. I have no issues with you being a clown trying to start fights and stuff or those praising your stupidity, because, deleting a whole âss post takes only a few clicks. So you are free to seek relevance under my mentions, I'm good with that. I don't owe you an explanation and I don't have to take down my reviews or stop posting because the don't satisfy you. I mean, why would I, you are a nobody.
|
Everything Everywhere All At Once 2022 First and foremost, you must understand that if you take this film seriously, you will be disappointed. The film is not serious about itself. While I recognize that if you want to make your audience laugh there are certain techniques to follow, the comedy and crazy can only go so far in impressing me. This film piqued my interest because it was billed as a science fiction flick. However, the biggest issue I have with it is that it does not provide much in the way of science fiction. Let's begin with the duration: 130 minutes! It's 130 minutes too arduous, and the questions I had at the end could have been answered if they had spent more time discussing specific details. Instead, they chose to lengthen it with a lot of unnecessary scenes. For a film that isn't really in the comedy category, it gets lost in it. If you don't use those extra minutes in the run time to impart detail about the film's elements, you're wasting my time. Then there's the setting; there's nothing to see here, and it's not even impressive. While their "Multiverse phenomenon" is conveyed in a novel fashion, it is also rather messy. The film appears to have been made on a shoestring budget; if this is the case, the funds were wisely spent. The theory of the Multiverse, on the other hand, is not something that low-budget filmmakers should pursue. You will need a large budget to present that kind of story in a colorful and satisfying manner, and that is the fact. On to the acting. The acting was excellent for the most part. I'm not a big fan of Asian acting, but I can tell when someone has put in a lot of effort to put on a good show. It's no easy feat to deliver madness on this scale, but this film has the proper personnel. The director deserves praise for a job well done. The plot moves along nicely, although there are a few flaws due to the large number of unnecessary scenes. The narrative conveyed a good message effectively, and while it, like most stories, has flaws, it is a pretty decent plot overall. Another aspect I need to address is the dialogue. It was a disaster. It falls short of expectations for a science fiction film. I was shaking my head even when I watched passages where they used native language with subtitles. The first 60 minutes of dialogue are nearly comical. As expected, superb fight choreography and decent use of CGI for an Asian film. I can't give this movie a higher rating than a five. Not what I had anticipated. Science fiction/Adventure ugh ![]() |
The King's Daughter 2022 Oh fùck, where do I begin? I was just getting ready to watch Jennifer Lawrence demonstrate her archery skills for seven hours straight when I came across this movie that I had forgotten I had saved. It was a good sign that I forgot about it because now that I've seen it, I'm having issues with everything in it. Let's start with the setting; it's for this reason that I value precision. When you're trying to use a time when you weren't even born, it's difficult to be unerring. If you think achieving such high accuracy is easy, wait until you see a movie where they fûcked the setting. Although the film is set in the seventeenth century, several of the materials utilized in it were not available until the 1980s. Did they time travel? I must have missed it. Then there's the CGI; So that was Atlantis I saw in this film, and some have dared to say that James Wan's work was unimpressive. The script feels like it was presented to them by a seven-year-old, and the acting, well, just three individuals deserve to get paid. The dialogue was designed to make you cringe. In fact, this film fûcked my brain so badly that I laughed at way too many scenes. Anyone who heard would have assumed I was watching a comedy classic, but there is no humour in this film. Everything in this film is deserving of a two, but I'm not going to give it that. I'm sorry Sir Brosnan was in this film, and as a result, I'm going to raise the score by 50%. What the fùck did I just watch? I'll never get back those 93 minutes of my life. |
About to binge myself to fucksville with the entire collection. I hope it lives up to the hype. ![]()
|
Which movie comes to mind ![]()
|
Baddestguyp:What the fùck ![]() |
Death on the Nile 2022 I've seen maybe ten films that have used this storyline in the last five years, so let me not dwell on how basic the plot is and instead place more emphasis on the conveyance, that appears to be what I'll be doing from now on. This film required a lot of effort all round, you could tell and that is one of the perks of entrusting a massive budget to individuals who have a coherent sense and know what they're doing. Everything is in harmony and appears to have been placed there on purpose even the tiniest things contribute to the overall picture. The first 45 minutes are leisurely, and the last 25 minutes are frantic. But, it makes sense when you put yourself in the shoes of those crooks and consider how quickly they were compelled to formulate fresh plans and cover their tracks. Also, when filmmakers create films with an atypical setting (something that does not ensue in the present day and time), they tend to start the film slowly to lure you into the picture they have drawn. Other films with this theme include The Batman and DUNE. If they execute everything well by your standards, it will be a lovely place to live for the next 90-120 minutes. The acting is above average, but not on the level of an Oscar nomination. What I will commend is their accent and dialog, a good amount of effort went into it and it paid off. However, I have to fall back to the plot and subtract points. It's completely predictable, and I've actually seen films with a lower budget tell the story better. It's a murder mystery with a crime-solving plot, and the protagonist is a detective (like knives out movie). However, you'll be able to figure out who the criminal is inside the first 15 minutes. In addition, I don't buy the way they drew the conclusion. There are numerous plot holes and I am left with burning questions. If I'm being generous it's a seven. You can't offer an overused plot in a realistic manner? What fuckery. |
Holy Fûck
|
John Cena na MAD man ![]() Kai |
Hawkeye season 1 It's completely predictable and precisely what you'd anticipate. The story revolves around a rookie in training. The plot, action sequences, and acting are all very basic. Basic Marvel material, not for individuals who aren't Marvel aficionados. Those kingpin scenes will be completely ludicrous to anyone unfamiliar with Marvel comics. It appears that this season fell short of it's goal. In the second season, we'll still need cranky Clint. The best aspects of this flick, which feels like a movie was split into six pieces, are the comedy, Christmas themes, CGI, and that adorable dog. I'll give it a six. Man, I really hope She-Hulk doesn't end up being like this. |
I'll have to loose my sanity to find these things worthy of my time. |
blingxx:People complained about DUNE. The actual fûck |
Achilles100:Yeah, Joss Whedon, the original creator had to step down. But they are back and they have finished shooting. Just waiting for them to release it. |
The Nevers seasons one This X-Men wannabe approaches the story from a perspective that Marvel has never revealed. Despite being an intriguing show, the season comes to a dismal conclusion. I'll do you a favor and recommend that you watch the most recent episode first. The show has made me yearn for a second season (something that the Wheel of Time could never do). There are about three well-developed antagonists, and I must see how they are resolved. Everything is on target, including the acting. Solid seven we got here.
|
Oh, OK, it seems I'll be using rotten tomatoes. They know what they are doing.
|
Karleb:Lol people don't appreciate a well crafted plot again these days. ![]() |
he/him pronouns ![]()
|
abduleez1:Thanks man |
Omo this DC Titans na glorified nonsense o. I have watched four episodes in season one and still this thing no get direction. ![]() |
I don't think there is any thing wrong with this. Are we now saying that they cannot accept gifts from other men? He said he wouldn't buy the bag then she went out and got it, why is he worried? ![]()
|
The picture below is that of Kelly Mcgills and Tom Cruise, 1986 and 2022. And before you will ask, she is just 5 years older than him. She was wondering why she can't reprise her role in Top Gun. Imagine if they got married, how will he live with this land whale? ![]() What did you hear about men aging like wine? Lol ![]()
|
webhead:The trailer did not deceive you. You deceived yourselves with different rumours. ![]() |
she like ![]()
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (of 77 pages)



It's my opinion, please rest. Or better still post your own.