₦airaland Forum

StudyBarn:
Catherine the Great saw to that, Odessa too if I remember correctly. Lmao

StudyBarn:
Crimea doesn’t belong to Ukraine in the first place.

StudyBarn:
We hate Ukraine because a megalomaniac allowed his countrymen to be used as cheap fodder to further US strategic goals.

Read the Atlantic they don’t even hide it that they are weakening Russia for a fraction of US defense budget. Shame!!!

Acekidc4:
Ukraine wey don Jonz tey tey.............. Their Comedian President don use them do comedy show to his Western Masters.

fijiano202:
Honestly All these man said is true ...Ukraine President is the dumb person in this Case ..like I said from the Beginning Ukraine is bound to lose more and more in the War ...

As long as the War drags on there will be nothing left in Ukraine than few cities ....


Even NATO is not assisting Ukraine ...USA is top backer for them

Now Joe Biden is Facing alot and I doubt he would Win America again

lhordspy:
HUNGARY, A Parliamentary Republic Is A Member Of EU AND NATO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8JI-eYQylg
Speaking in a Bloomberg interview at the Qatar Economic Forum, Orban argued:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-23/ukraine-can-t-win-war-against-russia-hungarian-premier-says

ALJAZEERA


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2023/5/23/hungarys-orban-says-poor-ukrainians-cannot-win-the-war

kkins25:
same bla blu bla blu.... How do you know this?

AudioMonkey:
Nice thread son.
First, I do appreciate your effort in putting all these together for few of us who care, in a forum where many may not appreciate intellectual contents like this.
I read everything and so far that I know, your description about the dimensions is apt, except that 0D/1D/2D/4D space don't exist. Everything in real world is already existing as full 3D dimensional object in a full 3D dimensional space. Even atom, cell are all 3D objects in a 3D space.

AudioMonkey:
Dimensions are more of the "perception" and the "observer". Some folks try to force their 4D space theory by modelling a tesseract but they end up unable to explain it. I doubt there's anything like 4D space object, no. All spaces end in the xyz 3D space - distance.
The universe' space and objects are in 3D but perceptions are not, rather they differ from one subject/observer to another. We perceive in 3D but not fully. You can't see what's inside or the rear/back of a 3D object.
It's more of perception rather than if the object is 3D or 4D object.

If 4D exists, then it's time. When you merge many 3D objects together, what you get is still a single 3D object but when 3D moves in space - time, that's a new dimension. Imagine a 3-blade fan spinning, it gets to a point you no longer see three blades, all you see is a single circular whirl because you're perceiving each 3D blade and it's movement in 4D time, all at once.
Imagine you can perceive the movement of a bullet from a gun and it's journey through space/time to a target at once, as a single event. Perhaps there are creatures which could do.

Space, objects and life already exist in full dimensions, the problem is just the observer and it's perception.

kkins25:
Your argument then conflicts an already solidified argument:

Since entropy is a form of energy measurement, and knowing that energy has no birthday and no funeral date, we can ask the question,

WHAT TIME DID GOD STEP IN? What is God's relationship in the grassroot fundamental principles that allow a universe to form and exist..

TenQ:
Within our 3D universe
1. Entropy NEVER decreases: thus there must be a time when it was minimum. This means the the 3D universe came to an existence art a point in time
2. Infinite Regress of Cause and Effect is impossible in our 3D universe
3. Every Law of Physics and Chemistry we know came AFTER the INFLATION of the Universe

The implication is that SOMEONE/SOMETHING out of the 3D Universe who/which existed before the Laws of Physics and Chemistry created this Universe.
We call this SOMEONE/SOMETHING the "Uncaused First-Cause of Everything": aka God!

A dummy will proceed to ask "Which God?"

Skyview01:
Ok. This is my personal opinion and do not take it personal as you are entitled to your own opinion as well.

I often hear couples give testimonies about looking for the fruit of the womb for about twenty years and some of them may even be in their fifties or late forties.

My question is, what is stopping these couples from adopting and putting joy in the life of some hopeless baby out there in the motherless homes.

Why are we not able to spread happiness to some hopeless baby while still continue to wait on the lord. Why must we adopt our relatives?

When people tell me they prayed for 15 or 20 years for the fruit of the womb, i consider them with a mixed reaction, some come across to me as selfish to be honest.

You are looking for babies, there are babies out there looking for parents, i believe the law of demand and supply should work here or wada ya think.

If you are out there and looking to God for the fruit of the womb, adoption is a viable option.

I know a lady who had her womb removed during a fibroid operation. She is still praying for the fruit of the womb for the past ten years instead of going to adopt.

officialwdhtv:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MHQ2giyCso

An Ekiti boy named Tolani "aka tolani danger" has generated electricity from 2 stones to power his home

Speaking on camera as he showed how he did it, he also said that he once generated electricity from an electric fish before and people around his community could testify to that.

Take a listen!!!

#wetindeyhappenTV

📺👇👉 https://fb.watch/kHMF3BoYQU/?mibextid=Nif5oz

lhordspy:
Tsunami of IPOB.

This is just mere embellishment. It is very common in yoruba land. It is some kinda false glorification, adornment, or adorement given to a loser, so as to prevent them from crying or falling into further depression, a consequence of their woeful performance.

A 'Tsunami' that failed to have 25% in 5 out of 6 Southwestern states.
- Couldnt even make 10% in the entire NorthEastern States, his party wasnt even included in the presidential result sheet from the region.
- Was nowhere to be found in NorthWest.
- Non existent in Kogi, Niger, Kwara in Northcentral.

The only tsunami he caused was the division of Muslims and Christians.
What a Tsunami !

kkins25:
Then how do you know God created all dimensions?

PastorAIO:
A)
It is possible for a one dimensional being in a one dimensional world to speculate on the possibility of other dimensions. All it has to do is realise that it exists within a dimension, understand what a dimension is, and that it is just a span within which Change occurs. All that has to happen is for a higher dimensional being to pass through its one dimension. It will experience this as the higher dimensional being suddenly appearing and then disappearing again. If it experiences this then it can extrapolate from its knowledge of its own dimension that other dimension can exist.
As long as one can be aware of dimensionality then it won't much to consider that there may be other dimensions. We are already doing it here. We understand what a dimension is because we live In a dimensional existence, namely SpaceTime and from that we can extrapolate that other dimensions exist.

TenQ's questions:
1.it is NOT reasonable to conclude that only 3 dimensions and Time exist. In fact no scientist does so. Physics is full of talk of higher dimensions. It is impossible (or hard) to explain current observable events without recourse to some higher dimensions.

PastorAIO:
2. They should investigate phenomena that seem to appear and disappear into thin air. Also phenomena that seem to influence each other from a distance without any force seeming to pass through the established dimensions.

PastorAIO:
3. The knowledge of 2D may have some help in understanding 3D but there may be some other phenomena unique to 3D that 2D doesn't have.

PastorAIO:
4. Why not?

kkins25:
What about RELATIVE TO GOD?

Maynmann:
Bwahahahahah
How did you arrive at your own theory of relativity before applying it to dimensions?
What are the requirements for relativity before it even becomes a theory? Have you met the requirements?
You are using assumptions to prove assumptions, is that not fiction?

When you know the origin of the word “angel” lemme know, going further, you’ve heard of “archangel”, have you ever looked up the origin of the word “arche”.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arche

Maynmann:
Only relativity is used in science.

Relative (adjective):
Everyday meaning: When something is described as relative, it means it is considered or assessed in relation to something else. It implies a comparison or dependence on another factor.
Example: "The temperature in this room is relative to the temperature outside."


Relativity (noun):
Scientific theory: Relativity, specifically Einstein's theory of relativity, refers to a fundamental physical theory that describes the relationships between space, time, and gravity. It encompasses two theories: special relativity and general relativity.
Special relativity: Special relativity deals with phenomena observed in inertial (non-accelerating) reference frames and explains the behavior of objects moving at speeds close to the speed of light.
General relativity: General relativity extends special relativity to include the effects of gravity, describing how mass and energy curve spacetime and affect the motion of objects.

You lack meaning of words you are using, ordinary “spirit” you don’t know, learn them first, look up the language in hebrew.
You lack knowledge on your beliefs, that’s why you are lost.

Maynmann:
Hope you know that Old Testament belongs to jews and they call it tanankh, if you want to learn the true meaning of words and whay they mean, revert back to judaism and the hebrew language.

Here more knowledge on your beliefs
https://www.learnreligions.com/angels-kabbalah-tree-of-life-124294

Maynmann:
I condemned the way you use it compared to what it means in science, see what you said “Relatively (to us) God is in the Highest Dimension because
In God ALL our dimensions exist!”

Is this how science use relativity?

Maynmann:
You are reading a book you lack his context.

What are “angels”?

You lack knowledge on your beliefs.

Maynmann:
So science use “relative” in the way you are using it?

In scientific discourse, the term "relative" is often replaced with more precise terms or concepts.

In physics, for example, the theory of relativity, specifically Einstein's theory of general relativity, describes the relationships between space, time, and gravity. In this context, "relative" refers to the dependence of physical phenomena on the reference frame of an observer or the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy.

Maynmann:
...
How you are using relatively to discuss science is baffling lol

Maynmann:
Does demon and angels have the same word as “spirit” lol.
Look up the origin of the seperste words and also, have you ever researched what jews think of demons?

Maynmann:
A proof you do not understand what you are saying.

“God is in the Highest Dimension because
In God ALL our dimensions exist!”

You just suggests that God encompasses or contains all dimensions within Himself, he is the highest dimension doesn’t mean he is within the dimensions, he is higher and beyond dimensions.

How you are using relatively to discuss science is baffling lol

Maynmann:
Yes. Spirit means the same definition.
It seems your definition of “spirit” is muddled up.

Maynmann:
So why does your god need to be in “higher dimensions” if he can exist without it?

Maynmann:
The word in hebrew here is rûaḥ, ruah means air, wind, breathe.
Even if you look up the origin of the word “spirit” in English it means the same.

Is the highest dimensions also not in God?
Did your god not create dimensions? Why then is he within his own creation?
Without dimensions will your god still live?

Maynmann:
Your god existed before he created dimensions, heaven and earth right?
So he doesn’t need dimensions?
What then does he need “higher dimensions” for?

TenQ:
I have explained this before!

Acts 17:28:
"For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring."

Relatively (to us) God is in the Highest Dimension because
In God ALL our dimensions exist!

Maynmann:
If your god is not an object then why does he need to be contain in a dimensions?
Dimensions are for?

Heaven here means skies, if you notice the heaven here is plural.
Earth here means ground.
Spirit here means air.

When the waters were further separated into different parts, a firnament was created to hold and separate water from above from water below, which kind of dimension is that?
What does “firnament” mean here?

kkins25:
But Dimensions are the dwelling place of anything that can exist..
Since, we know that God has essence, which means he is made of "substance, " then this "substance" must dwell in some of "being" defined by parameters (let's assume its beyond our perceptive capabilities), that will most likely be called something even if it is not "dimensions". Let's not forget that Heaven is the abode of God, considering the distinction between heaven and earth, it means heaven has boundaries different from and does not inter-mingle with the boundaries of earth.

If God is confined to those boundaries, then it isn't far-fetched to proclaim that God Himself may be oblivious to spheres of existence beyond dimensions of the earth and heaven .

If God is the singularity, then God cannot be the Christian God. He must be the God of the Buddhist. Because, If you're correct, then God didn't create anything per se, instead, He was the "stuff" that stuffs were made from.

Maynmann:
Is your god an object, if your god created everything, is everything not in him?
That verse has nothing to do with dimensions.


Look up genesis 1:1, with no form and empty, check the hebrew world, it means chaos.
There was no dimensions then, dimensions was introduced after light was created.

Maynmann:
If he created everything which includes dimensions, he is beyond that, he doesn’t need dimensions, why would a creator lower himself to the frame of his own creation?

kkins25:
But, your argument still fails. What you're trying to do is sneak God into the position where he created all the dimensions; therefore the highest dimension that can exist. However, your argument has already being contemplated by the Gnostic creationist who argued that the God you're referring to, YHWH, is the Demiurge, Sabbodoth, who also thought he was the ad infinitum. Unknown to him, the demiurge, that there are several beings above him, e.g Sophia, his mother.

If the 2D cannot fathom the existence of 3D, it goes without saying that the God-D also cannot fathom dimensions over his. After all, 1D exist in 2D, 2D in 3D, ad infinitum. What dimension does the God-D dwell in?