₦airaland Forum

Kalistus01:
Prophecy is never too late… it’s for us to watch and pray.

Kalistus01:
Check his YouTube channel then you will understand

ABIODUN105:
What a wonderful reply God bless you

Crumbian:
But Russia was a friend of Ukraine till 2014. You know what happened then right?

Crumbian:
Yeah yeah Putin is a bully, I agree but if you're pro-USA in this matter you should know that you're on the side of the biggest bully of all.

I only said what I said because you were talking about zelensky like he's some hero pulling things off by himself. He's just a tool, a very foolish one, without his backers he is nothing (apart from being the president of Ukraine of course).

ben1daEbiri:
Lol this must be playing

Kalistus01:
You need to watch the video before you comment… it’s a prophecy to avert the impending disaster that could happen to ukraine if you don’t pray.

ben1daEbiri:
Putin's hands is itching to use nukes. For the sake of the whole world nobody should dare him to do that because if nukes are involved the world is doomed. The West is playing the long game that's whey they've not given Ukraine ICBMs or any other kind of weapons that will hit mainland Russia. Forget the longtalks and egos bigger than cruise ships being displayed. No one has enough balls to use nukes as almost all the countries that have nukes have a no-first-strike policy

Kalistus01:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3g8rqmh1WtU

Crumbian:
Zelensky would've disappeared if the entire west isn't backing him. He's only acting like a hero because of their support.


He would have disappeared long ago if it's just europe backing him cos those ones can't withstand the "bully".

Sickobeatz:
Pls let’s go on email. I don’t want any more issues here

Crumbian:
You think to invade and capture a country is easy? You know how many personnel and how many country it took to capture Iraq?

itsRhamzy:
Russia on the defensive? What planet do you live? Ever since Russia left Kherson have Ukraine taken even a feet of land? Whats happening in Bakhmut? Oh Russia is on defensive over there too

Where Russia tell you say Dem go take Kiev in 2 weeks? Only zombies gulp every news without checking if true or not

itsRhamzy:
you don't understand. They tried joining NATO but US turned them down without any reason. It was there Russia realized US has made Russia an enemy of NATO to keep NATOs relevance flourishing because without any common enemy, NATO will die a natural death as no one is willing to fight wars or become an enemy of NATO.

So you understand why Russia is fighting this war. NATO and American imperialism seek to use Russia's close neighbors to get to Russia and breaking Russia into parts as an endgame to create the good atmosphere to stealing their oil 🛢️ like they did in Iraq and Syria and Libya.

Russia is too powerful to be defeated or crushed like Iraq otherwise America would've stepped in with boots on ground. The only thing keeping Americans at bay is Russia's military and nukes. US cannot risk fighting an enemy having almost equal brutal strength and mad abilities to strike back delivering devastating blows as well. They can't fight an ememy that could decimate their beautiful cities 😂 hence why they're using Ukraine as a pawn in the fight.


For those in doubt, kindly watch this video on this Facebook link below and hear things from the horse's mouth. You won't find this video easily on the net as they literally censored every legit news coming from Russia to keep the world away from knowing the truth behind Soviet/NATO and Russia's application to join NATO. US imperialism is a cancer to the world.

https://fb.watch/iQAHQcFYd3/

itsRhamzy:
he's in Ukraine with his army taking over 20% of the country's Territory. Why hasn't the American supported Ukraine army chase them away? Ukraine haven't even captured an inch since last year October and some of you think Russia will be defeated in Ukraine. You're welcome to try

underpinna:
I stay in a one room self-contained with no electronics, iron.
My landlord wants me to share equal amount of money in terms of NEPA bill.

Is this right?

Sickobeatz:
I don’t really remember my dreams but there is one that really got me and it was crazy…

Pls can we talk via mail.

Kobojunkie:
God is the one whose purpose is fulfilled by the need which He created, yes? His first Adam failed and creating a need for a second Adam, yes?

God is the one who said this was all to redeem His Name ---- He said several times too. He cursed the need for a second Adam to redeem His honor after the first rejected His Law, placing in the second Adam all that is necessary for the success of His purpose.

TenQ:
Even though to NEED and to REQUIRE are sometimes used synonymously, they are different

“require” means to ask for something
while
“need” means to want something very much.


To Require = To Cause to Be Necessary
To Want = To Desire something


In this sense, God CAUSED it to be NECESSARY for a worthy Sacrifice Atone for Sin

The Basis for our SALVATION is God's Love.
However,
Does God NEED to LOVE Man?
Why would God choose man over His Angels?
Ps 8:4:
"What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?"

Kobojunkie:
You are still saying the same thing and your focus is, in my opinion, still on the wrong thing.

God created all of this for His benefit and purpose. This wasn't all a hobby or tinkering project for Him. Instead this is what God purposed to do and He did it. So when God said He would redeem His Name, it wasn't simply because He has free time but because it was what He had purposed to do -- a necessity. So, I don't see how playing around with words here can change any of that.

God's purpose from the beginning has been to harvest for Himself Sons of God using the Covenant of Truth and Peace which was originally rejected by the first man, Adam. To see to it that His purpose is fulfilled, God then used the people of Israel, created the need for redemption and hence a Master Copy Son of God with which to use in achieving His purpose.

Overlooking all of that just because of a measly word....argghhh!

Kobojunkie:
You are still saying the same thing and your focus is, in my opinion, still on the wrong thing.

God created all of this for His benefit and purpose. This wasn't all a hobby or tinkering project for Him. Instead this is what God purposed to do and He did it. So when God said He would redeem His Name, it wasn't simply because He has free time but because it was what He had purposed to do -- a necessity. So, I don't see how playing with words here can change any of that.

Sickobeatz:
Hello guys I don’t know how to put this out or anything but I am dying inside due to something I did in the Past. I actually visited a cele church and collected soap ever since then omo I no know watin I don do with my life since that time I just dey reckless I no know who I one tell like this. Everything just dey do me one kind. Pls if you have an idea of what is happening to me and wanna share it privately you can mail me on here

Theanonymousmedia3@gmail.com

Kobojunkie:
1. I understand your concern but isn't a need technically same as a requirement?

2. Yes, God does not need to save man but for His Name's sake, He has need to save man. He said that a lot in His message through the prophets. This need for redemption which we have, God created by the clauses He carefully inserted into His Old Law of Moses --- the National Constitution of the Nation of Israel. God, by introducing the clauses which deny redemption under the Old Law to all those cursed under it made His New Covenant a requirement, the very same Covenant that was rejected by Adam in the beginning brought back in to redeem those cursed by God.

MightySparrow:
Oh, my brother.
I thought you are a Muslim.
The likes of Antichristian can make one angry beyond measure.

I appreciate your exposition and correction.
Thanks a lot.

jaephoenix:
Then he's Flying Spaghetti Monster. All praise to his noodly limbs

jaephoenix:
And s/he doesn't have a name?

Kobojunkie:
God technically didn't need a Son but God Himself by agreeing to the requests made by the Israelites created a situation sort of requiring a Son - born not just of the blood of Jacob but also of David - to sit in His stead over Israel.

▪︎ God agreed to send prophets to the people from among their brethren
▪︎ God also agreed to set up sons of Israel as King over Israel - no foreigner has ever ruled over them in their land as King
▪︎ God set up Israelites as Priests over His people declaring that no foreigner can sit as Priests in the land over His people
▪︎ God also agreed to set up a King forever of the House of Israel..

You put that all together and you find that God created that need for Himself.

MightySparrow:
You are a Muslim, you don't have a part in our covenant.

[11]And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables:
[12]That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.
Mark 4:11-12

Be preparing for your Al - Jaanah and enjoy your houris.

MightySparrow:
[53]Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
[54]Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
[55]For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
[56]He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
[57]As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
[58]This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

John 6:53-58


These are the very words of Jesus.

The question is: why would Father need a Son for the redemption of mankind?

drlateef:
He led other prophets in prayers at Masjid Al Aqsa, he was present honey and milk by Angel Jubril and asked to choose one. He chose honey which has effects on his ummah. When he was coming back, on his way he saw caravan coming to Makka and he described the caravan. Soon after that the caravan arrived as describes and people witnessed his statements and confirmed the arrival of the caravan as described. Go and read details if you truly want to know the truth.

drlateef:
Your response shows you don’t know the true story of Israh wal miraaj.

drlateef:
Did you read my earlier statement? Did I not tell you what he saw on his journey and because he was transported faster he arrived before the caravan which he saw on his journey? And everybody saw the caravan when it arrived. Is that not a witness that he did travel? And the rest of the journey is only fir him, not for everyone to witness. And Allah confirmed that he did travel to Allah in Quran. Muhammad SAW was not known to tell lies. Don’t you know that?

NEFERTITIxx:
Nah you’re wrong
I’m a Muslim
And a very proud one ☝️