₦airaland Forum

deandavid: my brother in as much as i knw catholic church is the most powerful and contrversial boby, to have survived 2000years. But serious the devil has infiltriated the church, jst watch as the next pope will bring change to the world. www.thewarningsecondcoming.com

vedaxcool: The report sounds a bit illogical, would the pope resign over a scandal that he is not involved in? It seems more like media people making a field day out of this resignation, this is not the first time a pope would resign! Secondly one would expect the pope in such a situation to crack down on such foolishness rather than run to hide in a monastery as if being chased by the devil? any way nothing is impossible but before Ratzinger became pope he was referred to as doctrine enforcer, how would someone who enjoyed hounding catholic priest who did not tow the line of the official catholic doctrine suddenly become scared stiff of some hoodlum gay priests?

elampiro: Cardinal: Married Catholic priests a possibility
Associated Press - 12 hrs ago
LONDON (AP) — Roman Catholic priests should be allowed to marry and have children, Britain's most senior Catholic cleric said Friday.

Cardinal Keith O'Brien, who heads the Roman Catholic Church in Scotland, said the requirement for priestly celibacy is "not of divine origin" and could be reconsidered.

He told BBC Scotland that "the celibacy of the clergy, whether priests should marry — Jesus didn't say that."

He said that "many priests have found it very difficult to cope with celibacy," and while he had never considered marriage himself, "I would be very happy if others had the opportunity of considering whether or not they could or should get married."

O'Brien, 74, will form part of the conclave of cardinals that chooses the next pontiff, following the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI.

Benedict announced earlier this month that he will step down Feb. 28 — the first pope to resign in almost 600 years.

The cardinal said that the next pope would be free to consider changing church policy on issues, such as celibacy for priests, that were not "basic dogmatic beliefs."

He said that "we know at the present time in some branches of the church — in some branches of the Catholic church — priests can get married, so that is obviously not of divine origin and it could get discussed again."

In recent years a number of traditionalist Anglicans opposed to the ordination of women and other changes have joined the Roman Catholic Church. The pope granted special dispensation for married Anglican clergy to stay married and be ordained in the Catholic Church.

O'Brien also said it was time to think seriously about having a pope from outside Europe.

He said he would be "open to a pope from anywhere if I thought it was the right man, whether it was Europe or Asia or Africa or wherever."
http://news.yahoo.com/cardinal-married-catholic-priests-possibility-172115510.html. ........

Mathew 19: 11-12Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word (celibacy), but only those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.”

....... Cardinals like this are enough to give the Pope plenty headache.

ayox2003: ...Unmentionable relationships.

So those close to the Pope weren't just gays...they were gays doing 3somes, 4somes, using dil-dos and toys with sadomasochismic styles and org-ies sprayed all over their faces after giving themselves a hot deep throat.

Mary mother of Jesus!!!

If "Fathers" could do these things, only God knows what those "sisters" would be doing to themselves.



Frawzey

lexio: Making use of "The Catholic Priests" is way off the track. Not all catholic priest are homosexuals. Some are. As to your question, the Catholic church authorities isn't taking it lightly especially in the seminaries were priests are formed. A little suspicion of being gay is all that is needed to get a young man expelled. He doesn't leave alone. All his friends especially close ones even those with no manifested gay tendencies will need a miracle not to get expelled. A Gay priest once detected is in for serious disciplinary action which does not exclude laizication (loss of clerical state).

kingoflag: Lmaooo

This dude, do you have a pen.is or a vag.ina? Are you on your period? Right now youre like a person than wasnt invited to a party, but insists on dancing with the celebrant in the middle of the dance floor. And you dare talk of madness?! lmaooo Anyway sha, na you talk say you dey dance azonto, no be me. Look at ur 1st post till now... typical... goad, prod, irritate... then when you get some sense slapped into your flat head you start trying to acting innocent.

Are you ok in the head? Why are you trying to derail the thread? Are you the Pope? Are you a Priest? But your pathetic, looney, hypocritical African self is doing everything in your might to derail a thread based on a subject even white people are distancing themselves from. But, like the typical African that has embraced another's beliefs, you lack integrity and will lie even if God himself stood in front of you. Didnt your Bible preach against homose.xuality? So whats your grouse? Why do you guys revel in worshipping men? Are you more Holy and Knowledgable than the Pope himself who has chosen to distance himself from this scandal by resigning?

Gawwd, the hypocrisy of a certain sect of black men will never cease to amaze me. Everything about you is always filled with lies and deceit. Can you speak the truth for once, u demon? Before we know now, you go encourage your family make dem stand for sun make each person vote 15,000 for a re.tard that'll do nothing but drag the rest of the country back just because your myopic self hates the religion and language of the better qualified man.

Abeg move and go play in traffic. Bloody hypocrite.

mankand: why the catholic faithful angry here? you should be aware that the vatican habours the highest criminals in the world and even your pope is not exempted. he was a former Nazi member.

Shine your eyes

kingoflag: Report: Pope resigned in wake of gay priest scandal
Doug Stanglin, USA TODAY4:51p.m. EST February 22, 2013
Pope transfers top official amid speculation about report on Vatican leaks scandal.

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/media/USATODAY/USATODAY/2013/02/22/ap-vatican-pope-ash-wednesday-4_3_r536_c534.jpg?1b79b3da202957124496e3768cfb7b67cdb10c81

(Photo: Gregorio Borgia AP)
STORY HIGHLIGHTS


Three cardinals reportedly discovered an underground network of gay priests
Pope Benedict announced Feb. 11 he would resign Feb. 28
The Vatican will not comment on the reports of the cardinals' investigation
The Italian media is reporting that Pope Benedict XVI resigned after receiving the results of an internal investigation, delivered in a 300-page, two-volume dossier, that laid bare a sordid tale of blackmail, corruption and gay sex at the Vatican.


The respected Italian newspaper La Repubblica reported Friday that the report stamped "Pontifical Secret," contained "an exact map of the mischief and the bad fish" inside the Holy See.

The newspaper said the findings of the nine-month investigation, headed by Spanish cardinal, Julian Herranz , with the assistance of Cardinal Salvatore De Giorgi, former archbishop of Palermo, and Slovak cardinal Jozef Tomko, was delivered to the pope on Dec. 17, 2012.

"It was on that day, with those papers on his desk, that Benedict XVI took the decision he had mulled over for so long,'' the newspaper said.

La Repubblica said the panel drew upon "dozens and dozens" of interviews with bishops, cardinals and lay people. It said the pope was kept apprised of the investigation in weekly meetings from April until December. The final, bound in red leather, is being kept in a safe in the pope's Vatican quarters, the newspaper said.

A similar story was carried by Panorama, a conservative weekly.

"What's coming out is a very detailed X-ray of the Roman Curia that does not spare even the closest collaborators of the pope," respected Vatican expert Ignazio Ingrao writes in Panorama. "The pope was no stranger to the intrigues, but he probably did not know that under his pontificate there was such a complex network and such intricate chains of personal interests and unmentionable relationships."

A Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, has refused to comment on the reports.

"Neither the cardinals' commission nor I will make comments to confirm or deny the things that are said about this matter. Let each one assume his or her own responsibilities. We shall not be following up on the observations that are made about this,'' Lombardi said, according to the German news agency Deutsche Presse-Agentur.


https://www.gannett-cdn.com/media/USATODAY/USATODAY/2013/02/11/pope_00016-4_3_rx512_c680x510.jpg?0f5c31de35bf4ef88a50c2e35ee3bc4da4bf3083

Pope Benedict XVI embraces children during a visit at the Fazenda da Esperanca, a facility for recovering drug addicts, on May 12, 2007, in Guaratingueta, Brazil. Franco Origlia, Getty Images Fullscreen

Next Slide


In announcing his resignation Feb. 11, Benedict said that he no longer had the "strength of mind and body" to carry on. A conclave will select a new pope next month.

Lombardi has indicated that Benedict would meet with the three cardinals before stepping down Feb. 28, in one of his final private audiences.

La Repubblica reported that the pope would personally hand the confidential files to his successor, with the hope he will be ''strong, young and holy'' enough to take the necessary action.

The investigation was triggered last May when the pope's butler, Paolo Gabriele, was arrested and charged with having stolen and leaked papal correspondence that depicted the Vatican as a hotbed of intrigue.

The papers were published in a blockbuster book. The butler was convicted in October of aggravated theft, and later pardoned.

The three-man panel, according to La Repubblica, discovered an underground gay network whose members organized sexual meetings in several locations, including a villa outside Rome, a sauna in Rome's Cuarto Miligo distirct and even in a beauty salon inside the Vatican.

The gatherings, in turn, left them open to blackmail from people outside the Vatican, the report said, according to the newspaper.

La Repubblica quoted an unidentified man described as ''very close'' to the authors of the dossier as saying it contained information about violations of the sixth and seventh commandments, which forbid adultery and stealing.

The British newspaper, The Guardian, notes that the sixth commandment also "is linked in Catholic doctrine to the proscribing of homosexual acts."

The U.S. website, The Daily Beast, reports that investigative journalist Carmello Abbate went undercover with a hidden camera in 2010 in Rome to produce an expose called Good Nights Out for Gay Priests.

The scandal has erupted as the pope is clearing the decks of his pontificate, tweaking the rules of the conclave, finessing the religious rites used to launch the next papacy and making some eyebrow-raising final appointments before he retires next week.

The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano said in editions published late Friday that Benedict had signed a decree earlier in the week making some changes to the papal installation Mass, separating out the actual rite of installation from the liturgy itself.


Vatican Undersecretary for the Relations with States, Monsignor Ettore Balestrero, arrives for a press conference at the Vatican in July.(Photo: Domenico Stinellis, AP)
He is also studying the text of a separate document governing the rules of the conclave, though it's not known if it will address the thorny issue of whether the election can begin earlier than March 15, by some interpretations the earliest the vote can start under the current rules.

And on Friday, the Vatican announced Benedict had transferred a top official in the secretariat of state, Monsignor Ettore Balestrero, to Colombia.

Some of the documents leaked in the midst of the "Vatileaks" scandal concerned differences of opinion about the level of financial transparency the Holy See should provide about the bank, the Institute for Religious Works. However, Balestrero himself wasn't named in any significant way in the leaks.

Lombardi said Balestrero's transfer had been months in the works, was a clear promotion and had nothing to do with what the Vatican considers baseless reporting.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/02/22/pope-leaks-fallout/1938321/

MostHigh: WHY CONTRADICT YOURSELF?

IF THE ASSISTANT OF CHRIST (IN THIS CASE YOUR POPE) IS AROUND THEN WHY DOES CHRIST HAVE TO STILL COME AND HEAL THE PEDO CHURCH FROM THIS DISGRACEFULL CRISES?

WHY CANT THE INFALLIBLE ASSISTANT OF YASHUA IBN JOSEPH SAVE THE DAY?

ITS BECAUSE HE IS FRAUD JUST LIKE THE DOCUMENT (DONATION OF CONSTANTINE) THAT SUPPOSEDLY GRANTED HIM THIS POWER AND TITLE

UBENEDICTUS THE VICE OF CHRIST IS CHRIST HIMSELF AND HE SITS AT THE RIGHT HAND OF THE FATHER (DONT REMEMBER SEEING ANYONE SIT AT YASHUAS RIGHT HAND) WHICH IS WHAT YOU AND YOUR KIND ARE SUGGESTING.

PEACE LOVE AND JOY!!

chukwudi44: I wonder what this idiots will write next? Maybe he resigned to contest the next German election

kmcutez: Do you know how difficult it is to gather evidence in cases like this, especially after decades later. My word against yours. Why go after 1 or 2 priests when you can be patient and bring down the whole filthy organization, like what is happening now eh?

blink182: How can God speak to him when the ministry of the Holy Spirit is barely acknowledged by the catholic church.

I pray he won't be among those Jesus spoke of in Matthew 7:22

frosbel: Quite strange that this happening at the same time that this same Cardinal has asked the Vatican to allow Priests Marry in this Article

Some church insiders have started a personal vendetta against him.

This Catholic church is such a bundle of corruption and evil.

badjack: Much talked resignation of Pope Benedict XVI. I know some of you may disagree with me. I am not surprise that this is happening now. Pope Benedict XVI had no business becoming Pope in the first place. The unnecessary politics in the Vatican warranted this whole thing.

After Pope John Paul II, it was obvious that the next Pope was supposed to be Cardinal Arinze. The racism in the Catholic Church took over this reality. It is a very big shame that the Catholic Church that has been around for over 1000 years has not gotten a simple black Pope or from another race other than Caucasian. Don’t get me wrong, I am not racist but I will see justice in a situation where in my church, I will be taken as a second class citizen just because of my race. That is smelly. I am a good Catholic but I am not comfortable with the racist politics going on in the secretive Vatican.

The real truth about Pope Benedict’s resignation is that there are lots of pressures on him towards liberalization. He as conservative is not ready to bend the age long laws of the Catholic Church. Some of these laws are Women ordination, Condoms, abortion, contraceptives, handling sexual abuses by priest to minor, the ever increasing divorce cases and the role people divorce will play in the Church.

The liberalists are growing in number and influence. This is unsettling the pope. Some of them are even powerful in the Vatican and in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church.
John Paul was shot at close range; he survived but did not resign. He even had Parkinson disease but did not resign. He continues till death. So be the judge yourself.

Lovethywilbedon: I will bet my last card that you don't know anything about Papal Infallibility.

greatgenius: @ Ube ..taking this on a different tangent... Understand that separating your thoughts from you In most cases breeds acts of irresponsibility.. This is actually how the man made creation called the " devil" was birthed.. in separating your thoughts from you, any thought deemed "evil" and therefore ungodly is assigned to and as coming from the devil.. thus in creating an imaginary " devil" humans have cunningly freed themselves( so they think ) from taking responsibility for their " evil" thoughts ... The downside is in creating the " devil" humans have made themselves powerless and their creation the " devil" powerful.. That's why it said that the " devil" rules the world because he has your power( well you have given it to him )..

Responsibility is power. Taking responsibility is taking control. When you take responsibility, you gain power. When you do not take responsibility, you are giving away your power to something or someone else.. Power is freedom because power gives you choices.. To have choice is to have freedom.. So to take back the power of this world from the " devil" people need to start taking responsibility for their thoughts and actions and in so doing free themselves from the grip of the " devil "...

Irresponsibility breeds the illusion of separation and vice versa ... There is no God outside of yourself and likewise no devil outside of yourself ...

greatgenius: you seem not adept at the subject at hand and as such we are going in circles... it is illogical to say that your thoughts are not you.. your thoughts are a form of energy and so is your very being..the aircraft that you "create" is made of energy..in fact by "creating" the aircraft you have not created a new energy to add to the already existing energy in the universe, but merely brought together already existing matter(energy)to form the aircraft.you have not created anything "new" but only changed energy into a different form... at the end if you break everything down to their core - you, your thoughts, and the aircraft-, you get nothing but energy..energy is all there is and you are a part of it. in fact you are all of it..
i am keeping it simple because you seem to not really understand the concept.
i am not sure what you are trying to say here but again differentiating God from his creations suggests and implies she created you from something outside of himself... but the truth is nothing else existed or exists outside of energy/God,the Source, from the beginning..in the beginning all that existed was and is God nothing else. and yes God "turns" himself into matter.. energy and matter is the same thing.. e=mc2
is not you just don't undestand..you still live In the illusion of separation..

yes all around you and in you is God..is that not what your bible tells you..that which animates you is the spirit of God. but the your ignorance and the problem is that you think God needs and wants your worship.. well you are a part of God whether you believe it or not.. you cannot not be..you and God are one and the same..the son and the father are one and the same..
lol maybe you should explain your idea of energy because i honestly think you have little understanding of it.. You have a limiting perception of God.. you will have difficulty understanding and knowing God if you keep putting him In a box.. understand that you cannot because she is boundless and limitless .. you cannot look at her as just the alpha and not the omega .. You limit his nature when you see him as just the alpha... she is both alpha/omega, the light and darkness, the beginning and end.. there is nothing he cannot be because he is all things.. everything is an expression of the one infinite Creator...

greatgenius: you seem not adept at the subject at hand and as such we are going in circles... it is illogical to say that your thoughts are not you..

your thoughts are a form of energy and so is your very being..the aircraft that you "create" is made of energy..in fact by "creating" the aircraft you have not created a new energy to add to the already existing energy in the universe, but merely brought together already existing matter(energy)to form the aircraft.you have not created anything "new" but only changed energy into a different form... at the end if you break everything down to their core - you, your thoughts, and the aircraft-, you get nothing but energy..energy is all there is and you are a part of it. in fact you are all of it..

i am keeping it simple because you seem to not really understand the concept.
i am not sure what you are trying to say here but again differentiating God from his creations suggests and implies she created you from something outside of himself... but the truth is nothing else existed or exists outside of energy/God,the Source, from the beginning..in the beginning all that existed was and is God nothing else. and yes God "turns" himself into matter.. energy and matter is the same thing.. e=mc2
is not you just don't undestand..you still live In the illusion of separation..

yes all around you and in you is God..is that not what your bible tells you..that which animates you is the spirit of God. but the your ignorance and the problem is that you think God needs and wants your worship.. well you are a part of God whether you believe it or not.. you cannot not be..you and God are one and the same..the son and the father are one and the same..

lol maybe you should explain your idea of energy because i honestly think you have little understanding of it.. You have a limiting perception of God.. you will have difficulty understanding and knowing God if you keep putting him In a box.. understand that you cannot because she is boundless and limitless .. you cannot look at her as just the alpha and not the omega .. You limit his nature when you see him as just the alpha... she is both alpha/omega, the light and darkness, the beginning and end.. there is nothing he cannot be because he is all things.. everything is an expression of the one infinite Creator...

Anyigala: I thought he resigned to avoid arrest

Lxgking: Gud write up, but So in conclusion, wat u re meaning is that, SOME SINS RE SIN, bt NOT ALL SINS RE SIN...my conclusion nw dear, is dat sin is sin...nd if u re of d mindset dat u re doin a small sin, while others re doin greater sin,so God in his infinite mercy would mayb overlook urs or send u 2 purgatory(small hell), then u re on a longtin, because d bible made us 2 understand dat 1sin leads 2 manysins nd dat no stain would be allowed into d kingdom of God(no mata how small), so my dears, we shuld be careful of how we think nd reason, nd ask God 4 4giveness of our every sin(no mata how CLAIMED big or small), do u pple even know hw many times we commit adultery everyday of ourlives( MATTHEW 5:27-30), nd u my dears re here giving pathetic excuses of ur small nd big sins, wat madness nd stupidity,be careful; O' HOLY FATHER.. "FOR EVERYONE HAVE SINED AND IS FAR AWAY FROM GOD'S SAVING PRESENCE"(romans 3:23.) ...our arguing nd weak nd excuseful minds can also rephrase it dat "for all who committed GREAT sin has sinned nd ar far away 4rm god's saving grace" an in so doin committed sin by changing d word of God, 2 suit his own purpose, so my dear, LETS BE CAREFUL OF HOW WE THINK...note that am a catholic also....tank u nd God bless.

digospel2: [b]Sin is sin of a truth.[/[/size]b][size=8pt][/size][size=8pt][/size][size=8pt] All unrighteosness is sin means you are either right or wrong in your actions and every wrong doing amount to sin. The wages(reward) for sin is death(spiritual) Romans 6:23. God in I Samuel 15:23 ,classify rebellion,witchcraft,stubborness,iniquity and idolatry as one that is equal sin. Likewise Galatians 5:19 - 21, grouped all sin as works of the flesh that can hinder one from inheriting His kingdom. once you miss the kingdom of God you are heading to hell which is the second and final death. So please, don't be deceived; stealing a cup of garri carries the same penalty with armed robbery and abortion leading the sinner to hell(death). It is the old law that group sin for death and those not for death e.g. adultery attract stoning to death. Therefore get understanding when the Bible make reference to the old law and know what the new law prescribe. REPENT FROM ALL SIN FOR THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS AT HAND.

wiegraf: While rare, that doesn't make the act right. Everyone does it is not a valid excuse to break the law I would think, two wrongs don't make a right etc.

Anyways, overall, for some of these cases the statue of limitation passed, that's why I was careful to mention suing and not arrests earlier (good ubene of course missed that). But there were coverups, lots. Police sef seem to have turned a blind eye, probably because of 'church'. Ratzinger himself does not seem to have been involved most, but some of his behavior has been questionable.

My hope is the church doesn't get special treatment simply because it's the church, and that sort of seems to be the case. Their not reporting crimes and deciding to secretly try these cases in church and not local courts is rather troubling. it's akin to members of a cult taking matters into their own hands. They want to do that, that's fine and dandy, but they should also report the issue to local authorities. That's how it works when say an employee is caught breaking the law. The case is reported and the company still disciplines the employee. They could fire or demote him, etc, but again, there's still the crime to report to authorities. If the employers are discovered to have attempted a coverup of any sort they are prosecuted by authorities as well (if caught ie). That shuld apply here.

plappville: RELIGION - The Italian media explain the surprise resignation of the Holy Father by the presence of a "network" gay would put pressure on certain prelates ...
According to an article in the Italian newspaper Repubblica, the announcement of the resignation of the Pope, which will be effective February 28, is due to a secret report that was presented to him. This would indicate that some prelates have been "outside influence" lay they were bound by ties of "worldly nature."
In clearer terms, some of the most senior members of the Church have suffered blackmail men with whom they could have sex. "For the first time, the word homosexuality was delivered" in the apartment of the Pope, the newspaper reported.

"Opinions" according to the Vatican

This is the pope himself who had asked three cardinals retired him a report after the collapse of the case Vatileaks. According to part of the Italian press, the Pope's annoyance after receiving the findings reinforced his desire to resign.

The Vatican has deemed these fanciful statements or false. His spokesman, Father Federico Lombardi said there would be no "denials, without comment or confirmations," speaking of "assertions and opinions" in the press. Officially, the renunciation of the Pope is due to the weakening of the Holy Father.

[url]http://fr.news.yahoo.com/d%C3%A9mission-beno%C3%AEt-xvi-due-%C3%A0-r%C3%A9seau-d-%C3%A9v%C3%AAques-080405988.html[/url]

MostHigh: and d bible say Jesus d has d keys of d kingdon and also say peter was given d keys. There is no contradiction unless u are looking 4 one.

SO HOW MANY KEYS ARE THERE?

PERHAPS YASHUA HAS THE MAIN KEYS AND PETER WITH YOU AN MYSELF HAVE THE SPARE KEYS ABI?

and yet d bible only records dat one, just one apostle is given d keys of d kingdom.

LIKE I SAID THIS IS A MISTRANSLATION. IF THIS IS TRUE THEN WHAT ABOUT ME AND YOU DO WE NOT GET THE KEYS AS WELL OR NO ENTRANCE AND EXIT FOR US?

he could only draft d letter after peter had concluded d arguement, it seems u didnt notice dat detail.
WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH AUTHORITY? JAMES WORDS ARE CLEAR (MY JUDGEMENT IS THIS)HE DIDNT SAY PETERS JUDGEMNT IS THUS AND THUS. YOU MAKE IT SOUND AS IF JAMES NA PETER PRIVATE SECRETARY.

really? Infact i claim d title, i'm christ assistant, i'm a member of his body and he continues thru me his work. U are uneccesaryly oppose to d title.
IF YOU WERE A TRUE DESCIPLE U WOULD KNOW THAT WE ARE ALL EQUAL IN CHRIST NOTE MATHEW 23 YASHUA IN A MOST AGGRESSIVE STATE TALKING ABOUT YOUR KIND AND THE PEOPLE YOU WORSHIP.

ITS BEEN A LONG TIME COMING BABYLAN IS FALLING.

SEEING THAT YOU ALSO CLAIM VICARIUS FILLIE DEI AS YOU TITLE IT IS CLEAR THAT YOU AND YOU SPIRITUAL FARTHER HAVE A LOT IN COMMON I HOPE YOU DONT INDULDGE IN THE COVER UP OF CHILD MOLESTATION AS WELL?

JUST A NOTE VICARIUS FILII DEI SUMATES TO 666 REMEMBER THIS MAN WAS ALREADY RUNNING THINGS WHEN JOHN WAS LOCKED UP IN PATMOS
PEACE LOVE JOY!!!

aku626: contrary to what your posting says the passage you quoted does not truly go along. Every sinner would go to 'HELL FIRE'

Mintayo: No need of arguments-all unrighteousness is a sin;anything done outside faith is a sin;if you know what is right and you do not do it,you v committed sin, no small or big sin-sin is sin!
God does not hate a sinner,He only hates the sin the sinner commits and he will judge any sinner who does not repent and forsake his/her sins!
All sins once forsaken can be forgiven but a sin against the Holy Spirit wil not be forgiven!

salt 1: Op you are on risky ground if you're looking for the sin you can commit and still not go to hell. I fear this holy God too much for that .

"Thou(God) art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity" Hab 1:13


"For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law" James 2: 10,11

The verse you mentioned is a favourite of Catholics. They make distinction between mortal sin and sin that cannot kill.

The beloved John didn't give any illustrations to his statement and neither will I.