₦airaland Forum

BloomingDale:
After. He said he has girlfriends, so there is also a big possibility she has boyfriends too. Women ain’t stupid.

In other cultures, particularly in the East. Married women opening their legs for another man is a taboo, with serious societal and sometimes spiritual consequences.

BloomingDale:
You know how many dicks don drill your wife. Or who do you think those married men are sleeping with?

Are you talking about before or after he married his wife?

Olastep:
Ehya. Are you their girlfriend?

Even if its true, I don't understand how it justifies his sleeping with a married woman on live TV.

ogwumgbe:
Blasphemy bullshit happens only in the North, have you heard of killing someone for Blasphemy in the entire South? It's not possible, if they cite that blasphemy bullshit, then you treat their Bleep up, but it's good to allow them wear their hijab for principle of fairness

Then what of the ones that insists on Burka for principle of fairness.

WatchYourSix:
That was exactly what i said in my other comment..and one of you muslims brothers was saying so that we can dress naked....since when did primary school student dress naked??


If you want people to dress the way they want then abolish uniformity.....not that you will allow uniform and say muslims can alter is as they wish....

This thing will lead to war...im too sure of it...students will make fun of themselves or drag each other when they look different and muslims will take it up as attack against their religion

Its school for cryimg out loud...why cant we just let kids learn uniformly...must we drag religion into everything??

That's the modern plaque of the black man. He drags religion into every mandane issue. When Europe and US is losing Religion(Asian countrys have lost religion long ago) to concentrate on physical and societal development, Black Africans want expend all our energy and resources on religion. And eventually destroying ourselves with religious wars.

compton11:
was it only black that Arab enslaved?

Nah,but European Christians make their a racial thing justified from Bible.

And the Arabs did not justify their racial thing with the Koran?

WatchYourSix:
Cover your head in the confines of the uniform system....there are berets to cover head...there are scarfs to cover head...


Its like you dont know your muslim family... there will be no control...and thats how religious war will start...is it shoulder hijab or full hijab to the floor that will cover the entire uniform....hijab completely defeats the idea of uniformity among student....all of a sudden you are comparing use of earrings to a full attire..u are funny

One minute, children will behave like children and touch one muslim girls hijab ..the next thing you will hear is blaphemy...

U have not noticed that this problem is not raised in public schools...it is raised in christain established schools...like wadafuk....

That's why I am advocating that we do away with school uniform in public schools. And allow private school set up their school uniform according to their religious beliefs.

ogwumgbe:
They have the right as you do bro, their religion allows them to dress like that, it's discriminating to prevent them to wear hijab bro

That's why it's called a uniform. If you want us to do away with school uniform and allow everyone dress as they please according to their culture, religion or preferences, then by say so.

compton11:
nah nigga that ain't my ancestors plus the people that gave u same Christianity did this to them because of racial Superiority and they have dumb that Christianity to y'all

The Islamic slave traders were more brutal to your ancestors than their European counterparts. Their chances of making it alive across the Sahara desert was extremely slim

maasoap:
I guess USA and UK that allow Muslim girls to wear hijabs are not secular nations?
How is a small girl covering her head putting fear in you? Christian girl wears a beret while a Muslim girl wear hijab, which one is a favour?

You guys would be persecuting Muslims and still be crying to the world!

Irony of the millennia. Persecuting Muslims? You guys love speaking in irony. It's Muslims that persecute and kill others in Muslim dominated places.

compton11:
that is why I don't give a fvck about what u eat,if u like,eat a whole human

nigga my Yoruba ancestors never dress naked punk.

When the Europeans were hunting your ancestors like animals in the forest what were they wearing?

See pictures of your Yoruba ancestors being led away to slave ports like badagry.

maasoap:
He told you that what you wear is not his problem or headache. That if you like, go out naked. But you are saying he's angry because something in Islam makes him feel like that! Shocking!
Why should you be concerned about a girl covering her head unless it makes you angry? The angry one here is you.

It goes beyond a young girl covering her head. Its all about imposing your religion on everyone else with threats of violence. You guys want to dictate how others dress, dress, eat, drink and have sex.

Religion is supposed to be a personal affair between you and your God, but no, you guys must impose your beliefs on others.

Nigeria is meant to be a secular nation, where Muslims, Christians, traditionalists, Satanists and atheists are meant to live without fear or favour. But what do you guys do? Use violence and threats to impose your Islamic laws and religion on non Muslims.

HilcomTech:
Ignorance is not an excuse before the law. To be for warned is to be for armed.


Finally, you Christians should learn to tolerate and live in peace with others.

We Christians? You should advice your fellow Muslims to be more tolerant of other people's beliefs and way of life. I have never heard of Christians burn someone alive for insulting it's prophets, I have not seen Christians screaming "Jesus is lord" while beheading a person. I have never seen Christians abducting young girls and raping them in the name of God.

Islam's is the most violent religion in modern times.

compton11:
nigga how are we obsessed with your drunk ass and pig eating ass?


If u like dress naked to your daylight club called church,it ain't any body business!

There must be something in Islam that makes believers angry, intolerant and outrightly violent.

Why the anger, why the insult? Whats your business if I eat pig or drink kai kai? Did I use your mouth?

I can dress whichever way I like, that's non of your business also. Afterall your ancestors walked around bare chested before the Arabs and Europeans enslaved them.

HilcomTech:
And they will find themselves in jail.

Why? The judgement applies only to public schools. You cannot impose hijab in Christian schools just as you cannot send your child to Muslim schools and then refuse the hijab.

MaxInDHouse:
This is the problem with most of you guys, instead of reading carefully and digesting what others typed you just want to sum it all up in your preconceived thoughts and then believe you've gotten it all figured out!

Did you even read my comments or you just glanced through?

Well for the benefit of other followers of this thread i'll answer you:

There were real trees with good fruit in the garden of Eden but when God is talking about the knowledge of good and evil that is no longer a literal tree issue but the right to set rules among mature minds.
So the import of what you're quoting is that it's only God that can set the right standard for mankind so we don't get overly anxious and start killing one another just as most people does today in the name of WARS!

So you are insinuating that the tree was not a literal tree but a spiritual one, and that Adam and Eve did not eat a literal apple (or whatever fruit it was)?

mamdanju:
For your information here are the justices of supreme court
Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad GCON
Mary Odili CFR
Olukayode Ariwoola
Musa Datijo Muhammad
Kudirat Kekere-Ekun
Chima Centus Nweze
Amina Augie
Ejembi Eko
Uwani Musa Abba Aji
John Inyang Okoro
Lawal Garba
Helen M. Ogunwumiju
Addu Aboki
I.M. M. Saulawa
Adamu Jauro
Samuel C. Oseji
Tijjani Abubakar
Emmanuel A. Agim

Which among them are the 7 that sat in this judgement and their religion?

blingxx:
Yes on cultural day .. hijab is just a Vail to cover the head why are you so pained ?

I hope you will not complain too if a rastafarian boys wear the rasta cap to school.

KnownUnknown:
The child of course. Children are born with seen cin Sin and that’s why they cry, shit themselves, and act like veritable demons for the first few years of life. At the age of 12 the Holy Spirit descends on them and they become qualified for salvation by the blood sacrifice of super Jew.

This is the reason I left Christianity very early in life. It's too negative and narcissistic. How can you believe that an innocent child that just came into this world is already a demon? A new born exudes love and innocence.
No Holy Spirit descends on children at the age of 12. In fact that when children actually become demons. Because hormones are just starting to kick in and they exhibit a whole lot of irrational and rebellious behaviours. My 13 year old is almost driving my wife insane. I informed her that our daughter will be worse. Girls are usually more delinquent and rebellious at early teens. It's when they get to around 18 - 20 that their hormones begin to settle down and they start being sensible and rational.

compton11:
were whatever you want,that is your problem

But it's your guys that are more obsessed with what others wear, eat or drink. You guys get violent trying to impose your way of life on others.

CaptainFM1:
Religion will continue to destroy us, unless we find a way to separate religion from our day to day activities.

Religion is the worst legacy of our enslavement and colonialism. Its effects are more long lasting and destructive than slavery itself.

mfm04622:
Were Christians being stopped from using it before?
If they were stopped, I believe it is a general ban on jewelry in schools, not targeted against Christians

Why would there be a general general ban on jewelry in schools, when certain jewelries are worn as a religious obligation?

compton11:
nigga STFU


How is it paining your ass that a small girl wear hijab in public school?


It is public school and they have their Right

That means any one can wear any uniform or accessory to school in order to protect a certain religion or personal believe.
Why then are we fooling ourselves we are practicing a secular constitution? We should just say we are a Christian- Muslim theocracy.

Christistruth00:
This Judgement also means that Christians are also free to wear Crucifix Neclaces to School

And Rastafarians are free to wear their head gear to cover their dreadlocks.

Image123:
A fallen nature? Nature of God refers to man's triune nature and immortality. The beasts and the universe are not said to be created in the nature of God, are they?

What do you mean by triune nature and immortality? What is triune nature and is man immortal? How come other animal species like our closest species like the Urangutan and Gorilla don't possess these nature? And how are you certain that there are no other life in the vast universe that share these so called nature?

MaxInDHouse:
This is where we need understanding of what freewill means!
When the Bible said:

“From every tree of the garden you may eat to satisfaction. But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad, you must not eat from it" Genesis 2:16-17

Every tree means you're free to do whatever you like in life, but the tree of the knowledge of good and bad means setting standards for other humans (adults) that's the only thing God forbids them from doing.
Because it will lead to trouble and they will start seeking way to hurt one another!

Why would God put a harmful tree there knowing fully well they would eat the fruit?
It's like a father putting assorted toys for a 3 year old child and including a match box, and then telling the kid " every toy you can play with, but you must not play with the matchbox, else you burn yourself". And the leave the child all by itself. Obviously the child would lit the matchbox.

Who then is to blame?

justcool:
The things provided for consumption are plants (fruits, and vegetables) which, although living, do not feel pain.

Studies have shown that plants do indeed feel pain and respond to external stimuli, but it does so at a much slower time frame.

If mankind had not interfered or halted the development and evolution of creation, at this point man and animals would have evolved out of meat consumption and become vegetarians.

How did man interfere or halt the development and evolution of creation? Are you insinuating that man changed and destroyed God's plans?

It is true that at the initial stages, animal consumption is necessary, however this is not cruelty. At the initial stages of our earth lives, during our infancy, we suckled our mother’s breasts for nutrition. But this is expected only at the stages of infancy and once this stage is passed, the child is weaned off its mother’s breast.

Evolutionarily man started out as a vegetarian, as he had no facilities to hunt, eat and digest meat. But the need for more concentrated energy source to drive his increasing brain size and capacity made him include meat in his diet. Even up till now digesting meat is a problem for the human digestive system even after cooking (which partially digest it).

Some women have confessed that breastfeeding their children gave them indescribable joy. But do you know that breastfeeding is painful. Only a weakling will say that it’s cruel that infants have to suckle their mothers, which is physically painful to the mothers.
As with individuals, so with the entire mankind. Indeed, the development of a child mirrors the development of the entire human race.

Breastfeeding is only painful at the initial stage - the first few days after childbirth. After that it becomes pleasurable until the woman starts weaning the child of breast milk.

At the initial stages of development of the physical realm, living things had to feed on others to survive. This is quite beneficial to both the prey and the predator, as it keeps them in motion, preventing indolence and laziness which is detrimental to life. Animals gladly incarnate into this physical realm either to become a prey or predictor, as this helps their souls evolve. The hunting for food or running away from predictor gives the animals impetus to become alert; and this alertness helps their souls evolve. It appears cruel only looking at it from the physical perspective, however once you overlook the entire process, you will observe the blessing inherent in the process.

Agree with this postulation. The dynamics between prey and predator keeps an ecological balance for the environment. Predators keep the population of prey in check as they they usually breed in large numbers. Not keeping them in check would be destructive to vegetation of the environment. Preys are usually small in numbers due to the difficulties and dangers of associated with hunting prey.

The animals, like goats, cows, and chickens, that incarnate to provide food for mankind are like mothers who sacrifice their bodies, or gladly offer their nipples to infants. When one considers the joy that mothers feel when they see their children grow, the consequential pain that accompanies breastfeeding becomes negligible.

Don't agree with this. I am certain goats, cows, and chickens did not elect to sacrifice their bodies to feed mankind or any other animal. It's just the nature of nature.

You can say that strife is fundamental to earthlife; however, strive is not tantamount to suffering. Whenever excessive suffering arises, there you see the failure of mankind. The creator does not wish the His creatures suffer.

I agree that strife is fundamental to earthlife. I also agree that man contributes to excessive strife (sufferings) by our greed and lack of empathy. But to to put the blame solely on human is unacceptable to me. Nature plays a huge part in suffering also, aka diseases, famine, natural disasters, etc.
Are you insinuating that man can alter God's wishes? If that is possible, how come you guys continue to argue for his omni this and omni that?

DeepSight:
One thing I find with almost all theistic discussants on this subject is a dismissal of animal pain and suffering with respect to the issues raised. Any close observer of animals knows that many animals experience grief as well, just as surely as they experience physical pain, and yet their suffering is always lightly dismissed when these issues are discussed.

I will never forget the video of the hyena who goes after the testicles of a Buffalo, rips them off and starts feasting even as the Buffalo wails in pain. This is nature at work - and you cannot blame "original sin" for this kind of suffering. You cannot blame "duality" in the lower worlds for this kind of suffering, apologies to Benodic. It is just what nature is - brutal and heartless, simple.

That's one thing the theistic religions promotes very well - lack of empathy towards other animals and indeed other peoples as well. The only important thing to them is self and selfish pursuit of personal wellbeing.

The hyena example is rampant with humans particularly with adherent of theistic religions. Defrauding a person of his life's savings and life's work is no different from ripping the buffalo of its balls. The person will die slowly of the pains and grief of the difficult life ahead. His children and dependants might also die from the sufferings induced by the scammers. In all these the scammer doesn't care but thank his God for providing a free meal (meat) off the pains of others. This is also nature at its most brutal.

We humans (blacks) even take to the basic animalistic level by actually ripping out the balls (or virgina of women) and eating it (selling it for money) as a means of survival. What makes them different from the hyena.

The irony is 100% of people that engage in this type of animalistic brutal behaviour claim to be theists.

On thing I have learn from decades of being an atheist is that theism kills or deaden human conscience and allows him do evil things without the feeling of remorse.

Igbojew:
Oga which South South won't go with South East,I hope you are not involving my Igbo part of South South because we have nothing to do with other ethnic groups that make up South South except our South East kins.........I am that Igbojew the table shaker

But your igbo part of South South had never been in the same political unit as the South East. (assuming your are delta igbo)

SugarGirl44:
Sharap analyst isonu.
Yorubas don't reason with their anus like your people.
Mumu even said 'believe me'
Who tf are you clown?

And you think you are more Lagosian or even more Yoruba than I.

sulaak:
Lagos is Yoruba land, led by Yoruba leaders for hundreds of years. Lagos's economy cannot survive without the support of the surrounding Yoruba economies, the city is expanding into Ogun state and Oyo states with the introduction of express roads and modern railways.

The Lekki Port will integrate and expand industrial development into Ondo/Ogun.

I laugh at my Igbo brothers, that try and influence an independent Lagos and wonder why Yoruba's refuse to support their interest in Nigeria.

You are only being emotional instead of logical. The word Yoruba is a relatively new term. The people grouped as Yoruba today started as various diverse ethnic groups like Oyo, egba, Egun, Ife, etc. The part that comprised Lagos was inhabited by the Ijebus, the Eguns, the Aworis and the Edos ( who created the first monarchy).

Lagos was not politically under the Westen Region during the first Republic. Even in the third and fourth Republic, Lagos has been clamouring for a special status. I doubt Lagos would want to be subservient to a political South West region except of course political power (Capital) resides in Lagos.

treatise:
Where would south south belong?

South South will never agree to go back to the Eastern region. They fought tooth and nail to leave the Eastern region and there were wild celebrations when General Gowon split them from the Eastern region.