Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! by wirinet(m): 5:58pm On Aug 22, 2019 |
GalaticHorde: seriously, is this a President or some clown? It is so surreal that i am prepared to believe any hoax that claims that trump has be hacked to embarrass america and Americans, a teenager who is just coming to terms with his/her maturity in his/her society can not display this kind of stupidity publicly and be excused for it, but trust ®etarded republicans to create an excuse and try to defend this stupidity
Republican supporters under trump are ®etarded, reprehensible, repulsive, revolting, ridiculous, recalcitrant ruskie wannabe rimjobs without a genuine ounce of decency, not the hypocritical decency, genuine decency If Buhari makes any of the gaffes Trump makes on a daily basis, I am sure the usual suspects would have crashed the Internet with memes of illiterate and certificateless Buhari. In the 20th century, you want to buy a land belonging to another country on Twitter and making childish tantrums because they refuse. Maybe he should offer to buy Biafra, I am sure Nigeria might oblige if the price is good and biafrans would be happy.... But then, I doubt trump would want a country populated by blacks. |
Politics › Re: Nigerians To Pay More For Electricity Consumption by wirinet(m): 4:22pm On Aug 22, 2019 |
COMPAQ: Does that include split unit AC's? Maybe one 1Hp AC. It depends on the power consumption of your appliances. Solar energy is best with energy efficient appliances, like LED Tvs, LED lights, energy efficient fridge, freezers, ACs, fans, etc. |
Politics › Re: Nigerians To Pay More For Electricity Consumption by wirinet(m): 4:06pm On Aug 22, 2019 |
AK481: In monopoly,u cannot increase price and quantity demand at the same time ,read ur market structure note in economics if u have one.
The increase will create
Reduction in consumption and hence reduction in their total revenue
Electricity theft will be on the rise.
This will further impoverished the disco. You read your market structure in economics and at the same time supporting price control. Why not allow the gencos and discos to charge "market" price and see if you would be able to afford electric power. Dangote and the steel companies alone would mop up all the power allocated to ikorodu and would be ready to pay N60/kwh. The 4000MW generated and transmitted by all the gencos and transcos is not even enough for logos alone. |
Politics › Re: Nigerians To Pay More For Electricity Consumption by wirinet(m): 10:37am On Aug 22, 2019 |
Chicastle: but does this solar really work well bro? It works excellently well. With improved technology solar energy has become relatively cheap within the last 10 years. You can run all your house hold appliances now with less than N2 million, less than 500,000 if you run the basics - TVs, computers, lights and fans. A serious government would remove tariffs on solar energy products and watch the power companies cry. |
Politics › Re: Nigerians To Pay More For Electricity Consumption by wirinet(m): 9:42am On Aug 22, 2019 |
StrikeBack: Give us steady uninterrupted electricity and see if people won't pay There cannot be uninterrupted electricity without increase in tariff. The current tariff is not sustainable in the long run. The solution is individuals investing in solar. |
Politics › Re: Nigerians To Pay More For Electricity Consumption by wirinet(m): 9:40am On Aug 22, 2019 |
Chizuru01: I told my foolish nairaland friends that supports APC that this government does not care about the hardship of nigerians but his foolishness will never let him see it This isn't about about APC, periodic increase in tariff was built into the privatisation agreement of the power sector by the Jonathan administration. If the agreement was followed in toto, we would be paying double of what we are paying now. |
Politics › Re: “No Law Requires Me To Produce My Certificate” - Buhari To Tribunal by wirinet(m): 8:45pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
Educonomist: Imagine a country where SSCE certificate is among d least requirements to have for the office of a President...
Nigeria my country SSCE is not the least requirement. You could become president with a Primary Six School Leaving Certificate or its equivalent , you could even become president without even a Primary Six School Leaving Certificate , but with any other qualification acceptable by the Independent National Electoral Commission - maybe carpenter or herders certificate. |
Politics › Re: “No Law Requires Me To Produce My Certificate” - Buhari To Tribunal by wirinet(m): 8:34pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
MaNyEsq: You're totally missing the point. The issue is not what suffices for a "school certificate" or its equivalent." The issue here and my article is about Buhari's refusal to produce the documentation that shows he satisfies that section of the "Constitutional Requirement." So, your reference to section 318(1) of the Constitution that states what can substitute for section131(d) is honestly a moot point. The reason being that substitutes for "school certificate" as you enumerated above are not in question or being debated. Believe me, the certificate issue is a non starter and just a waste of judicial time. If you read between the lines, the constitution makes no provision for any specific educational qualification to be President, it did not even specify the submission of any certificate to qualify for the office of the president. It left the educational qualification to the discretion of INEC with the following; "(d) any other qualification acceptable by the Independent National Electoral Commission;”
This means once INEC says it is satisfied with any qualification you say you have, case closed. The school certificate requirements is cleverly worded; "(d) he has been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent." What exactly is secondary school certificate level ? Is an adeleke that sat for WAEC and scored F9 educated up to secondary school level? What of someone that finished class 5 or 6 as it is now and never sat for the exams. We are not even talking about the nebulous "or its equivalent" yet, which is solely determined by INEC. The writers of the constitution did not want to say, the president requires no educational qualification. |
Politics › Re: “No Law Requires Me To Produce My Certificate” - Buhari To Tribunal by wirinet(m): 7:35pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
MaNyEsq: I am not sure if Buhari can read and understand the Constitution of the country that he professes to lead, but for him to say before the Tribunal that, "No law requires me to produce my certificate," is absurd to say the least. If he's smart and intelligent enough to read and comprehend, then he should read Chapter VI, Part 1, Section A-131(d) of the Nigerian Constitution, wherein it states that: A person shall be qualified for election to the office of the President if -(d) he has been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent. So, Mr. President, you're absolutely wrong to make such a preposterous statement. As long as your educational qualification is part of an issue before the Tribunal, the onus is on you to convince the body by production of documentation albeit Certificates to show that you met the section 131(d) requirement and was qualified as at the time you ran for the office. That is what the Judicial process is for...to adjudicate matters that arose and came before it. I am amazed at the thought process of these imbeciles that claim to be the leaders of this country. You need to learn to be judicious with your words and think before you speak. Section 318(1) defines and provides thus: “(a) a secondary school Certificate or its equivalent, or Grade II Teacher’s Certificate, The City and Guilds Certificate; or (b) education up to secondary school certificate level; or (c) Primary Six School Leaving Certificate or its equivalent and – (i) service in the public or private sector in the Federation in any capacity acceptable to the Independent National Electoral Commission (“INEC”) for a minimum of ten years, and (ii) attendance at courses and training in such institutions as may be acceptable to the Independent National Electoral Commission for a period totaling up to a minimum of one year, and (iii) the ability to read, write and communicate in the English Language to the satisfaction of the Independent National Electoral Commission; and (d) any other qualification acceptable by the Independent National Electoral Commission;” It is evident from the above definition section of the Constitution that the meaning of “school leaving certificate or its equivalent”, for the purpose of section 131(d), is a lot more flexible and accommodating than the popular view. |
Travel › Re: Canada Is ‘Stealing’ Our Young People! by wirinet(m): 6:50pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
DexterousOne: It got much worse during the reign of the idiot economic terrorist we have as president Give us the statistics so we can compare, or did you just pull figures out of your nose? |
Politics › Re: “No Law Requires Me To Produce My Certificate” - Buhari To Tribunal by wirinet(m): 6:02pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
kutchs: But just how does one prove that he's educated? Possession of a certificate is the only way I know to produce that one has received education up to a certain level at least formally which is what's required here.
That you can speak and write good English, were seen in a school compound with uniform and mingling with other students/pupils aren't enough.
It's even shameful that a president of a 21st Century country doesn't and is proud to admit he doesn't have a certificate.
Even more shameful are the host of SANs defending him. This is what the Nigerian constitution says about educational qualifications of a president; 131. A person shall be qualified for election to the office of the President if - (d) he has been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent. Are you insinuating that Buhari had not been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent? |
Politics › Re: Were the Increased Oil Prices Profits Well Invested? by wirinet(m): 5:42pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
madridsta007: As you people miss Deziani's constant fuel, Kalu Aja says: With the looting we have a 1. Repaired Lagos to Kano narrow guage railway 2. Brand new Abuja to Kaduna standard guage passenger rail line. ...the first in Sub-Saharan Africa 3. 4 new international airport terminals. ..the one in Abuja linked to a light rail 4. New power plants...gas pipes and transmission infrastructure 5. Eradication of Polio and Guinea Worm and Ebola (and we are still battling with Lassa fever without any national policy direction smh) 6. 11 new Universites...150 Almajiri schools 8...new trauma hospital in Abuja with air ambulance 9..lagos to Ibadan; abuja to Lokoja, east west road, benin to ore, Onitsha to Owerri etc 10. Reequiped military. ...new attack helicopters. ..T72 battle tanks....ships...unarmed drones. 11. Tetfund and maasive commitment to education funding 12. $1.5b in savings....the only time since 1960 Nigerian had saved a kobo 13. Longest period of low inflation in Nigeria 14. N18000 minimum wage 15...tax cuts by increased personal allowances.... Let no one LIE to you. ...the oil prices were well invested Kalu Aja Where are the investments today? 1. Buhari removed the lagos to kano narrow gauge and destroyed the trains. 3. All four international terminals were vandalised the day Buhari was sworn in in 2015. 4. The power plants were producing 20,000 megawatts the day before buhari was sworn it, and then 3,500 the day after he was sworn in. He probably took all the new power plants to Duara. The eradication of polio was the efforts of Bill Gates (Bill and Melissa Foundation) and the eradication of Ebola was due primarily to the sacrifice of Dr. Ameyo Adadevoh and the quick intervention of the Lagos state government. ...... All you wrote is just are just lies and half truths. The most absurd one being no 12, about "$1.5b in savings....the only time since 1960 Nigerian had saved a kobo" Jonathan that blew all the money saved by Obasanjo at a time crude sold for over $100 and was still borrowing to pay salaries. |
Travel › Re: Canada Is ‘Stealing’ Our Young People! by wirinet(m): 5:20pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
madridsta007: Yes, Canada is not just taking our young people, they are taking the fattest of our crops, the best, the brightest, and the brainiest!
Not just Canada, but the US, Germany, Ireland, the UK, Australia, etc. The colonialists think ahead of the black man, their subjects. When Obama, Clinton and the UK were helping to topple GEJ in a bloodless regime change in the connivial of Nigerians from the North and South West, you think they hadn't seen this brain drain coming? Germany and Ireland, I am told from very reliable sources, were complaining that the IT industry, which had many Nigerians, had seen Nigerians relocate back to Nigeria leaving their families in Germany and Ireland because of the economic policies of the previous government. The NHS was loosing Drs from Nigeria.
Don't blame the colonialists. This is a capitalist dog-eat-dog system. Blame the Nigerians that helped topple the last government and brought in an inept and clueless and lifeless regime. The Jonathan government was not toppled, he lost the elections because it performed woefully in terms of security and corruption, it's not that Buhari has fared much better. The only difference was Jonathan had more money to splash around. That's how democracy is supposed to work. You lose elections if people believe you perform woefully. Buhari too should have lost the last election if not for rigging and the fact that the PDP presented an untrustworthy candidate. I wonder how long it will take a certain parts of the country to get over Jonathan's loss, it's been 5 years and they are still wailing. |
Travel › Re: Canada Is ‘Stealing’ Our Young People! by wirinet(m): 1:03pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
NaijaRoyalty: They are not stealing your people
Your people got tired of the likes of Buhari, Tinubu and Abba Kyari rulling them and too many unfulfilled promises of APC led government .
The unemployment rate hit an all time high since buhari took mantle of leadership , poverty and frustration escalating day by day.
Everyone is tired . You people are so obsessed with Buhari, it is beyond sanity. Did you hear of "Andrew checking out " in the mid 80s? Nigerians has been flocking to foreign countries since the mid 80s. I even knew some guys that trekked through war torn congo to get to South Africa after the fall of apartheid in the mid 90s. Brain drain did not start with Buhari, even during the time of Jonathan, Nigerians were being deported from war torn Libya. |
Family › Re: I'm Worried About My Son's Behaviour. Is He Normal? by wirinet(m): 7:28am On Aug 21, 2019 |
jess2019: My son will be 9 in October but his behaviour bothers me so much. He acts like a day dreamer. He has turned me into a shouting and miserable mum as I had to beat him after I've exhausted other punishment options. To make this short, I'm going to summarise his behaviour.
He still cannot get himself ready for school in the morning. Either he doesnt cream his body or forgets to comb his hair or doesnt brush his teeth. He forgets to brush his teeth almost everyday. This made me to make a list of step by step sticker. I sticked this on their bathroom mirror and on his bedroom wall. Yet I have to keep reminding him everyday. For example, last week on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday he forgot to brush his teeth and hair. I have to constantly be reminding him every morning. He is the only one that brushes teeth after getting ready. I trained them to brush teeth first before shower but he keeps forgetting.
I have to remind him to do his homework , and put it back in his school bag to return to school on Mondays. The book will still not make it to the school even after constant reminder. We've lost countless of lunch bags. One ended up on school roof. If you give him any form to submit back to his teacher. He will forget in his bag so I now give it to his sister to give to his teacher.
He removes his clothes, shoes, pants, belts etc and leave them on the floor, I bought two laundry baskets for him. One in his room, another in their bathroom, yet all his belongings end up on the floor that you can hardly find a space to put a foot. I dont expect him to be perfect but atleast to try so that his 70% clothes make it to the basket or shoes to their racks. He also has a book shelf and desk yet they also end up on the floor.
He plays so much that sometimes he leaves shops with items in his hands. So I have to always watch out for him. Living in a western country where black boys are stereotyped I fear for him. He can stare at the ceiling for hrs when getting ready for school or spend long time in the shower yet not using soap on his body. This usually makes us late unless I step in to help or keep shouting.
If you ask him to do any house chores, he will not do it instead waiting for us to forget so he can get away with it. When grounded not to watch TV, he will still do it once he knows am inside my room or busy with a baby.
Yesterday we revised all his lesson assignments (5 work books). I specifically asked him to put them in his lesson bag. I pointed at the bag. Now I drop him at the lesson only for him to say oh I think I came with old lesson books. I dont know how he ended up with old books in his bag. It could be he planned it as a way to avoid the lesson. If not I wonder how he will remember it himself as soon as I drop him and his sister as this is unlike him.
I've taken him to a doctor incase there is any diagnosis so I can give him all the help he needs but they said it's just his behaviour because according to the doctor he is smart academically. He is 18months ahead of his year level. So they ruled ADHD out. Give the kid some slack, you are putting too much pressure on him, and he is reacting. He is only 9 for got sake. You expect a 9 year old to get himself ready for school, bath himself, cream his own body, remember to brush his own teeth, do chores, clean his own room and remember to do his home work? What about cooking and paying the bills? Even some university students behave exactly like your kid. Kids have different personalities, and you as a parent needs to understand and treat each child differently and not expect all children to behave the same way. I have 3 kids, the oldest at 11years do his home work immediately he comes home before removing his uniform, the second never does his homework without cane, most of the time if my wife or I do not remind him, the homework will not be done. The irony is that his gets better grades than his senior brother that always does his homework, he has never gotten less than 90% average scores in any exams. You need to have patience. Parenting is not an easy task. I hope you have the help and support of your husband, not just financially, but also emotionally. Just keep guiding and correcting them, the habits you want them to imbibe will gradually sink in |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 9:03am On Aug 19, 2019 |
bishopkay: Your father is the vile pig! Your mother is the ho,e your father used as a cum bucket to produce you! Reason I called you a bastard from the beginning because it's written all over you and coded deeply in your DNA.
Bastard! Go to Abuja to weep. Go to ecowas and even world court to cry too you hear? You This useless stupid arsse pig. What do you know about jurisdiction? If the court didn't have jurisdiction would Nigeria ever have honored the suit being a sovereignty?
I'm done educating pigs like you whose parents didn't give home training and still won't read to develop themselves! YOU ARE A BASTARD for ever quoting me in the first place! Can you please quote any known law, whether in our constitution or any known international law that gives British courts jurisdiction over cases in Nigeria? This government does not recognise any such jurisdiction, that is why they have not shown up or sent any representative before the judge. We are waiting for the British government to nationalize Nigerian assets, so we can nationalize their own in return. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 7:09am On Aug 19, 2019 |
Debaiz: Bro I don’t know if you’re on twitter but you need to read this.
https://twitter.com/sarnchos/status/1139932904040124417?s=21[/quote]God bless you my brother. The whole thing is beginning to make sense now. You don't need to be a genius to know that the whole "contract" is a scam.
Even though I am no longer a fan of Buhari, I cannot wish evil and destruction on my country because of hatred for one man. It does not make sense. If the country perish, we all perish with it. It is beyond imagination that some Nigerians want Buhari to just dash an anonymous Irish company $850 million without the supply of any goods or services. It is even insane that some Nigerians are celebrating the award of a $9 billion penalty against the country by a foreign court without any justification. Any attempt to seize Nigeria's assets abroad is an act of aggression. |
Politics › Re: British court orders Irish firm to seize $9b Nigeria’s foreign reserves by wirinet(m): 5:19pm On Aug 17, 2019 |
grandstar: You do have a point.
The primary point I was trying to make and which you too are making is that the law is the law. Be careful of what you sign. Read between the lines.
I tried dabbling into some international business after leaving Uni and was signing NCNDA agreements. In many of these agreements, I'd sign that arbitration will be in Switzerland or some foreign country not wondering how I would get there  I understand, but signing an agreement as an individual is not the same as signing an agreement as a sovereign state. One man cannot just sign an agreement, especially if it has financial implications and expect it to be binding on the whole nation. It has to go through other people and other branches of governments. That's what separate democracy from dictatorship. Even before the government take any foreign loan, it has to pass through the national assembly, and the repayment also have to be budgeted by the national assembly. Unless you are telling me Buhari has the powers to unilaterally sign a $1 billion contract without recourse to any other person or branch of government. The agreements you signed only affects the issues in relation to the contract. The agreement cannot say if you reneged that all your assets around the world including your house in the village would be confiscated. |
Politics › Re: British court orders Irish firm to seize $9b Nigeria’s foreign reserves by wirinet(m): 3:57pm On Aug 17, 2019 |
grandstar: This is not a Third World vs First World skirmish. That is the way things work unfortunately for you. The same law that applies to Nigeria would be the same law that applies to America.
A Canadian province, Newfoundland is fond of signing atrocious contracts that deprive it of massive sums with other provinces. Unfortunately, it can't pull out as a contract is a contract. If it did, it would face the law as Nigeria did.
If you for instance wanted to make money from this judgment, simply walk up to the company and assure them you can help them retrieve some or all their money but for a fee. Let's say 15% of any money you recover.
If you know of any Nigerian assets you can seize in order to recover some of the debts and you succeed, you earn 15%.
For instance, read up about vulture funds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulture_fund Comparing apples and oranges. The Canadian province is signing atrocious contracts with other Canadian provinces and is judged under Canadian law. It would be atrocious for the Canadian government to sign a contract us a private US firm and subject itself to US laws, except that contract is covered by a government to government treaty. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 3:45pm On Aug 17, 2019 |
Olominira: Any African Nation still dealing with European and American companies is putting the lives and prosperity of her people in danger. Please, could someone tell me what the company did or supplied that we did not pay? At least, this company must have rendered a service or products Nigerians are benefitting from by now that we did not pay.
See the Europeans have the system to cheat us any time any day, they are well established for decades. Sierra Leone canceled an airport project and China did not do anything, the same China the west is critizing on daily basis. UK at the moment has a blinking future until their brexit is formalized. They would do everything to steal, and destroy weaker nations.
I listened to Paul Kagame few days ago questioning the BBC and the UK for their belittling every thing about Africa and always seeing themselves as standard for human rights. I read about this story for the first time on South Africa news early this year. The author questioned why would the company going to court despite not rendering any service. African leaders must wake up and start making sound decisions because of coming generations and black people around the world.
Stop awarding contacts to western companies, at the moment the Chinese offer a better deal by not giving lones directly to the politicians but to the companies executing the projects which are their own. That's why this issue is paining me. What service or goods did the unknown company render that nigeria is owing? Contracts are terminated everyday and the disputing parties are forced to renegotiate. Trump unilaterally pulled out of all agreements entered by Obama and the skies did not fall. It is unbelievable that some Nigerians are supporting this outright attempted theft by the British, they just wish doom on the country because they hate the current president. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 3:20pm On Aug 17, 2019 |
Debaiz: We don’t have access to the details of the contract so we don’t know where the contract was signed.
If the contract was signed in London, then a London court will have jurisdiction but if it was signed in Nigerian then like you said why will a Nigerian lawyer go and defend the case in London.
Also if the company is registered in UK and not Nigeria, then irrespective of where the contract is signed, the London court will have jurisdiction.
Whichever way it is, it is a bleeped up and mediocre situation for nigeria to be in.
I have problem with people dragging PMB into this nonsense. You can imagine someone claiming the previous government negotiated an $850m out of court settlement and blaming the PMB govt of not going with the settlement.
How will they go with the settlement? You agreed contract with someone, you refuse to honor the contract and you’re agreeing out of court settlement that is more than times 2 the initial investment without executing anything. It doesn’t make any sense.
If it’s not meant to embezzle money then why will you not honor a contract and you go ahead to approve such huge settlement? I wonder why the contract details is being kept secret. It would afford Nigerians to know who, how and why the contract was signed. It would not make sense for government officials to go all the way to London to sign a contract. The usual procedure for awarding of contract is that proposals are made made through the budget office and bids sent to prospective contractors. The bids must past through Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP), otherwise known as the Due Process Office before the contract is awarded. The whole project must be forwarded to the national assembly for imput into the next budget or approved a supplementary budget if it's urgent. Now, did this contract pass through due process? Before a contract can be awarded the foreign firm must be registered in Nigeria or be partnered with a company registered in Nigeria. The government cannot just award contract to companies with no presence whatsoever in the country. You raised a salient point. Why would the Jonathan administration agree to pay $850 million just 3 years after signing the contract, when the amount could easily have been used to execute it's share of the agreement? After all the amount is more than enough to lay the gas pipeline to the proposed production site. Finally, the contract looks very illogical. The company is to take liquid gas from the government, refine it to wet natural gas to be used to power gas stations, and then keep the bye products. Where are the gas powered stations, are the gas stations to be powered existing ones or new ones to be built? What of the pipes to the new or existing gas powered stations, should they not be built first? If their were plans to built more power stations, what of the transmission and distribution stations to be able to evacuate the power into the national grid? Our transmission lines had never been able to handle 5000MW. What was the over all plan for the project? |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 12:49pm On Aug 17, 2019 |
Debaiz: So between 2015 and now, $850m had grown to $9billion.
You self reason it does this make sense to you? Even if the interest rate is 100% per year will it have grown to $9billion in 4years? The worst part is nothing was built, nothing was supplied, the contract did not get off the ground, and the company wants to collect $9billion. We need to even see the details of this stupid contract. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 12:47pm On Aug 17, 2019 |
Debaiz: Oga invertedhammer you’re a forex trader and you don’t know the effect of someone refusing to honor contractual agreement since 2012 and here you are blaming next level. Is it buhari that entered the agreement and defaulted.
You as a trader, with this kind of judgement, imagine what will have happened to the naira if PMB had agreed to float the naira like the useless technocrats advices?
I can’t imagine the kind of trading you’d be entering into with this your biased or ignorance of who to blame for such judgement. I am not supporting the Nigerian government (whether Jonathan or buhari) for defaulting on a contractual agreement, my grouse is subjecting a contract entered into in Nigeria to British courts and laws. If you were the attorney general, would you go before a British judge an answer yes my lord? Or you want Nigerian lawyers who might not have license to practice law in the UK to study British laws and then go and defend the case. The case should have been handled at the Nigerian courts. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 12:33pm On Aug 17, 2019 |
bishopkay: I know you don't have sense and normally I don't respond to fools but with you I'd make an exception. And you feel you are making sense. Anyway a mad man also think he is making sense. You just wrote trash and because you think this is a blind forum you can come here to show case your foolishness huh? Just like your certificate less fraud of a master. What do you know about international trade laws? If the court which decided on this issue didn't have jurisdiction, Nigeria would have never honored the suit which led to all this. The nonsense you wrote only betrays your vile hatred of Buhari, nothing else. You obviously have no idea of international trade laws, that is even if you know what international trade is. Is this a trade dispute? Where is the trade? The British court was said to have assumed jurisdiction because it was thus stated in the contract. Ordinary a country does not have jurisdiction over cases in a foreign country. I hope you know that. One of the reason Britain is leaving the EU is because Britain does not want to be subjected to European laws. Nigeria is not subjected to British laws. The question you need to ponder is did those that signed the stupid contract have the powers to sign away our sovereignty? Who are the signatories to the contract? The power to make laws lies with the national assembly, was the national assembly involved in signing away out sovereignty? Even treaties signed by the executive has to pass through the national assembly. Since you ask why did GEJ's government not pay the money settled out of court, I'd respond with a suiting reply to such a foolish question. Why did the election rigging rugarist not reject the Paris refunds? Why did he not reject the repatriated Abacha loot even after claiming abacha never stole a dime? He should have sent the money to obasanjo or Gej because their governments initiated the moves. So you benefit from the estate of a benefactor but refuse his liabilities? Stupid analogy. The monies was returned due to mutual agreements between the two countries. It passed through normal diplomatic channels. It was not the Nigerian courts that ruled that Swiss government must return Abacha loot or else.... Now to answer your question albeit foolish, You think being a president gives you unfettered access to approve a payment just like that? These things take time and process which his government no longer had and which I'm very sure buhari was notified about on the hand over notes he was given. He as normal with him simply dumped it as he was only interested in the name "President". The time line for the process began and Nigeria was not on the table courtesy buhari pulling out of the arrangements and asked to proceed to court (go and read up this case and how buhari has handled it so far). Government is a continuous process and buhari goofed big time in this. However I'm not surprised... He's been a failure all along and am I surprised you his supporter Is also this dumb? No... After all Like birds like they say, flock together and for the records, you can relocate to Iran and you can also get nuked with your family too while at it.
Read and develop yourself, you won't agree. Ozuo! You can win the lie Olympics without rivals. You guys just lie that Jonathan negotiated an $850 million settlement. Here is the actual report; In 2010, P&ID entered into a 20-year agreement with the federal government of Nigeria to execute this project.
Under the agreement, the Nigerian government was to ensure that all necessary pipelines and related infrastructure were installed and that arrangements were made with agencies and third parties to deliver gas for P&ID to process. However, the Nigerian government failed to meet its commitments, causing the project to flounder. This meant Nigeria would lose the opportunity of a new power supply, and P&ID would lose 20 years’ worth of profits.
P&ID attempted on multiple occasions to find a solution, and yet Nigeria refused to come to the table. Arbitration commenced in 2012 before a tribunal in London. Although during the arbitration Nigeria claimed to be interested in reaching an amicable settlement with P&ID, in fact Nigeria never made a serious offer and it became clear that Nigeria was attending settlement discussions only to delay the proceedings.
In July 2015, the tribunal in London unanimously concluded that Nigeria was liable for the government having repudiated the agreement with P&ID. In January 2017, the tribunal ordered the Nigerian government to pay P&ID $6.6 billion in damages, plus interest that is accruing daily at a rate of over $1.2 million and now stands at $2.8 billion. However, because the Buhari administration refuses to pay, P&ID has brought court proceedings, in both the U.K. and the U.S., to enforce the award. If P&ID is successful, they can enforce the award against Nigeria by seizing its commercial assets. https://pandidfacts.com/about-pid/ In one breath you say a president don't have unfettered access to the treasury and in another breath you blame Buhari for not paying the alleged $850 million. That is what is called Cognitive dissonance. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 9:27am On Aug 17, 2019 |
MyGeneration: u sound very stup1d, i just expressed my opinion and u are declarating me as sm1 who hates the country, so because of stup1d u i should not speak my mind.
i am not sentimental in my judgment, before i said that i have done my research, the money is not supposed to be $9billion as of 2015 it was agreed that the government should pay $850million but the new government refused, this is almost similar with innosons case.
do u think that am happy that we are about to loose $9billion, that money is enough to finish our rail system in Nigeria, guy talk well o. Why not show us links to when the government agreed to pay $850million, and under what circumstances. The agreement was sign by the Jonathan administration, the agreement was reneged upon by the Jonathan administration, the $850 million was allegedly agreed upon by the Jonathan administration, how come you now expect it is the the Buhari administration to pay $850 million when crude prices crashed to $30 and have never gone beyond $60? If Buhari dashed the British company $850 million and our economy begins to suffer, you guys will be ecstatic blaming Buhari again for destroying the economy your hero built. If the company was not fraudulent, they should have renegotiated and reviewed the contract with the new government. That was what happened to all previous contracts negotiated with the former government and continued with this government. This is not the first time parties to a contract fails to live up to expectation. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 9:07am On Aug 17, 2019 |
donvicky2007: That money is too much and I can't agree with you, the best is to settle out of court. Can they try this shit with the US or other countries like India Pakistan or even Brazil? |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 9:03am On Aug 17, 2019 |
MyGeneration: Nigerian government should pay, because the more the money lingers the more interest that will accrue to it, before u know it we will be talking 12billion dollars.
Apc govt benefitted from the deal, cause most of the money seized by Efcc from most Pdp members is that money. They can ask for $100 billion. We should not pay jack. Do we even earn $9 billion in a year? Have the company ever made $1billion in its entirety existence? Ole, thief. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 9:02am On Aug 17, 2019 |
MyGeneration: no matter where the case is taken to Nigeria will still loose I know you hate the country, but why will you wish your country just dash away $9 billion? How can we pay $9 for a contract that was not even executed? We are to pay for assumed income and profit for a 20 year period. |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 8:47am On Aug 17, 2019 |
kindredspirit: I remember reading about this matter some years ago. The government said they had issues regarding how the company executed it's own end of bargain which they took exception to. I think the matter went to court and the government was going to settle out of court.
Looks like this government waved away that agreement with the excuse that the matter belonged to the previous government and should not concern this government. Solicitor General Dayo Apata gave voice to that mindset fatally nailing the case in favour of the company. The contract was a fraud from the beginning. How can they sign that they would go to British courts? What happens if Nigeria is not satisfied with the execution of the contract ( assuming there was actually a contract to be executed ) with a private British company? can a Nigerian court convict the British government? |
Politics › Re: Gas Dispute: Creditors May Go After Nigeria’s Eurobond Custodian by wirinet(m): 8:43am On Aug 17, 2019 |
bishopkay: I remember this case and the GEJ's government then opted for an out of court settlement. The arrogant bastard rigging rugarist came in and as usual threw everything he didn't understand away without asking for details forgetting government is continuum
Now Nigeria would pay for his foolishness very heavily! Imagine an out of court settlement which would have seen us pay $850m in tranches now a judgement debt worth $9b in whole payment. And to imagine one very uneducated fool went there with the APC blame game manuscript!
Does he think the UK'S judicial system is like ours here which lack merit and can throw away a case with substance for a filing technicality? They think because they win cases here using the we vs them syndrome they can go replicate that outside the country? Bunch of inept fools! Your hatred for the country is so intense, I am sure you wish for the country to be nuked, with you and your family inside, just because of hatred. Why should the Nigerian government be subservient to British courts. That's an insult to all Nigerians irrespective of tribe or religion. Who ever signed away Nigeria's sovereignty should be shot. At worst there are other international bodies that handles disputes between countries. Does it make sense for a British court to arbitrate a case between Britain and Nigeria? If your hero agreed to dash a British company $850 as you alleged ( which to me is a lie), why didn't he give them before he left office? How can he agree to dash someone money for no work done or goods supplied and hope the next person will pay it? I wish Nigeria was like Iran, you seize our $9 billion, we seize your assets and any British ship near the gulf of Guinea. Shebi, after trying shit with Iran, they have agreed to return the oil tanker seized after Iran seized a British tanker in return. |
Education › Re: 9As: Ugboaja Chizobam Stephany WAEC Result 2019 (Photos) by wirinet(m): 11:56pm On Aug 16, 2019 |
Aurielfinizu: DONT MIND THAT ONE..
she is the youngest ever to make such results..
this is why other universities outside Imo state give any candidate from imo high cut off marks in Jamb
Imo state almost produce the highest marks in jamb and weac..
mbaise precisely are very sharp, no wonder they produce the highest numbers of professors in home and abroad. False! My nephew was only 15 when he got 9 A1s in WAEC. He was not admitted into unilag because he was not up to 16years. It was reported all over social media 2 years ago, even here on nairaland - https://www.nairaland.com/4700826/age-david-okorogheye-denied-admissionYes this girl is a genius, but you guys are belittling her feat by making false claims. |
Politics › Re: British court orders Irish firm to seize $9b Nigeria’s foreign reserves by wirinet(m): 11:21pm On Aug 16, 2019*. Modified: 6:44am On Aug 17, 2019 |
seunmsg: $1billion is not a small money for any government to part with without exploring all possible legal options. I wouldn’t have paid if I was also in Buhari’s shoes back in 2015. How do you expect Buhari or any other new government to just pay a private company $1billion (that is close to N400 billion ) for nothing. No services rendered or goods bought. Why didn't Jonathan pay it before he handed over? He could he have agreed to pay the money but left it for his successor to pay. Again, why did the PDP administration enter into such a terrible contract and then fail to deliver? Isn't it obvious. Stealing that is not corruption of course. They negotiated a bogus amount for a bogus contract and collecting kickback or awaiting kickback. I am sure the people that negotiated the agreement are waiting for a huge pay off. When the Irish took the FG to arbitration, what effort did Jonathan put in place to resolve the matter? He practically did nothing until $6.6billion was awarded against the country in 2013. He then connived with Dezaini to negotiate about $1billion out of court settlement in a manner that raised so much suspicion that he couldn’t pay the money after the agreement. We really need to learn how to apportion blame appropriately. Why will any sane human sign such a stupid contract? Why will a country sign it's sovereignty away to British courts when we have courts in Nigeria. I have never heard of such before. President Jonathan and the people that signed our sovereignty away should be charged for treason. Going forward, we should support the government to explore all possible legal options before agreeing to a deal. The company is still very open to a negotiated settlement. Nobody is going to pay them $9billion. Which yeye legal option. You see why I love Iran. You can't try such rubbish with Iran. Britain seized their oil tanker, they siezed Britain's tanker in retaliation. If the British siezed our money in their hands, we should siezed all British assets in Nigeria. How can one pay $9billion for no service or goods, just pay because some corrupt officials signed some useless piece of paper. |