₦airaland Forum

4evergod3:
[s][/b]


Shaattaap and go suck on a pacifier! Did you have to take out 5 minutes of your time as an unconcerned atheist to show us your own attempt at damage control?

Atheists are the ones with serious self esteem issues. You are a dying breed. Remember this thread?

https://www.nairaland.com/3468885/atheism-dying-currently-life-support#51090360

Let me ask the butthurt doctor to help ease your pain...Oya bend over

Gosh, you people are so insecure that you grasp onto any straw to keep your ego afloat. What damage control? What damage has Mark Zukerberg of his statement done to any atheist or even theist (except a few Nairaland christians). I did not know of even care if Mark Zukerberg is an atheist or not, i was an atheist even before mark zukerberg was born, so what are you talking about.

You guys really need to see a shrink. You need to give purpose to your life other that hyperventilate at the sight of the word atheist.

hahn:
The funny part is that most atheists in their initial stage of self discovery often have the idea that they are the only ones.

It is only with time that they, like myself, begin to realize that other people have thrown God in the dust bin

Therefore, no atheist gets influenced by other atheists. You only become an atheist by questioning your own belief

4evergod and kingebukasblog are being childish as usual

Awon omo mummy

This is something that is very difficult for christians to grasp, that people do not become atheists because of proselytizing of other atheists. Atheism is a personal journey of self discovery, it is not a sudden spiritual event like being born again, it sometimes takes years to come to the realization that God is of no use in your life.

Mark Zukerberg is on his own personal journey of self realization, wherever he ends up is his own cup of coffee.

Na wa o. Why is Nairaland's Christian community so ecstatic about what Mark Zukerberg believes or not. Mark Zukerberg was never some sort of Atheist leader or guru, he does not have an atheist movement that he promotes, so i do not see how his one line sentence on his view on religion affects both atheists and theists the world over.

This is the statement that have gotten Christians excited here;

MZ: No. I was raised jewish and then I went through a period where I questioned things, but now I believe religion is very important.

He never said anything about being a christian, he never even said he believed in any God, he only said he was raised a jew now believes religion is very important, he never said what type of religion he now believes in, and to whom is it important to, whether to himself personally, to his family or to the society at large.

I for one identify myself as an atheist but i also thing religion is very important, not the viscous and vitriolic type of religion exhibited by Nigerian Christians and muslims, but religion as a personal affair on how one achieve harmony with oneself and the universe as a whole.

Atheism is as varied as the leaves on a tree, no two atheists have identical set of beliefs, the only common denominator of atheism is in the lack of belief in any God as promoted by different societies throughout human history. If you do not believe in any God, to me you are an atheist.

So Christians are alright and happy with Buddhists, Muslims, hindus, Ifa worshipers or even devil worshipers, it seems that the only people they have a morbid hatred for are atheists

This response by Nairalands christians show that they are very insecure and afraid of atheists

Because their creator told them to destroy all idols and graven images made by infidels and kill the infidels too.

Most Christians seem to agree that you cannot question your maker.

Here is a quote by splinz and supported by most Christians;

Splinz:
What truth That the creator decides to do with His own creation (children of disobedience) the way He likes and it becomes an issue?

Does the clay say to the potter, 'What are you making?

Blue3k:
What do you mean by technical education. I agree people should learn programing and basic computer skills but after that it might not be necessary. I think we have more then enough engineers to get something going.

I agree polytechnics needs to beef up their curriculum. More technical knowledge is needed. That would be another topic though. Building microchips for phone is hard part. The other parts don't seem as difficult.

Technical education is useless without a science education base. Technology is the application of science. Our main problem is that our education lacks a science base. Most science students in our secondary schools or even tertiary institutions do not understand basic scientific principles, they are trained to only pass exams, no practical knowledge. They do not understand practical applications of the gas laws, newton's laws, Bohr's laws, etc, and you want these students to graduate from universities and produce technological items.

admax:
That's the future senator of a senatorial area in Delta state talking.

He will return to PDP in full force and everyone will forget he went to jail for stealing.

The idiots that will welcome him at the airport are the same people that will burn a thief for stealing a phone.

Welcome to Nigeria!

Ibori might not be qualified to run for senate due to section1 subsection 66 of the Nigerian constitution;

66

(1) No person shall be qualified for election to the Senate or the House of Representatives if:

(a) subject to the provisions of section 28 of this Constitution, he has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a country other than Nigeria or, except in such cases as may be prescribed by the National Assembly, has made a declaration of allegiance to such a country;

(d) within a period of less than 10 years before the date of an election to a legislative house, he has been convicted and sentenced for an offence involving dishonesty or he has been found guilty of a contravention of the Code of Conduct;
http://nigeriaworld.com/focus/constitution/chapter5.html

Cromagnon:
can't produce engine without steel industry
Can't produce Steel without capital for mining and refinery
Can't mine without saying for permits
Can't pay for permits if we keep beeching and moaning instead of raising capital
So learning how to raise money /capital and how to deploy it is the issue now friend

I have agreed with most of your postulations so far, but I vehemently disagree with the above.

The problem mitigating against our industrialization has little to do with capital. It has a lot to do with capacity and manpower. We lack the high level manpower both technologically and managerially to initiate industrialization. I have a friend who is an investment consultant in london, he contacted me and told me that he has Chinese investors who are ready to invest $20 billion in Nigeria, but they were yet to find suitable partners that is apart from the problem of insecurity.
Like in business, the reason for business failures is usually not lack of capital, but lack of innovation. I know many people who became billionaires by introducing innovative ideas. Money always follows profitable innovative ideas.

Cromagnon:
how will he prove it without c of o

How did the Oniru family prove they owned half of Iruland (Victoria Island) before the land use act? You do not need a c of o to know who owns which land. Most lands in Ikorodu does not have c of o and yet we know which family owns which lands. The lands seized by the FG in 1978 is being won back by the families that owned the lands before the enactment of the land use act.

How did your forefathers acquire the land. By force or by mouth.

Ancestral land ownership is usually acquired by being the first to settle in a land, through forceful acquisition by war or through outright contractual agreements.

Can they challenge govt guns.

That was why I called it colonization. The lands were forcefully acquired through threats of guns.

Communism is govt control from far place that have no idea what's going on at local level.
CommunalIsm is a different ish .
And once you've collected c of o it's now capitalism not communism.

You have the wrong concept of communism. Communism is control of resources by the state or some other central authority. It could be local or national. It does not allow private ownership of land, capital or resources.

Cromagnon:
imagine if 1 man claims that his ancestors own all the land that Adam is his great grandfather. Pay to govt (rest of society) then collect c of o
Not colonisation just accountability

The man will have to prove that his ancestors own all the lands before the land use act was enacted or before colonization. One person cannot just come and claim land in a community that does not belong to him, every one knows which family owns with lands. Conflicts of land ownerships within families in a community are settled by traditional authorities.
Ancestral land ownership is the bedrock of societies. It is absurd to say that lands my father and fore fathers inherited from my ancestors now belongs to the rest of society. That is communism and we know communism does not work.

Cromagnon:
the farmers should pay for the land
Same with Niger delta
We have free market
Just lazy ppl

Why should farmers pay for their ancestral lands? A land inherited from their fathers and fore fathers, you are saying they should pay for it, to outsiders in state capitals, who has no interest in the land except for exploitative purposes. Sounds like internal colonization.

MakeADifference:
I was invited to dinner one day with a professor of theology and some housemates. The housemates were mainly Nigerians and also theology students (research students). Myself and another lady (a non nigeria) were the only non-theologians there.

During dinner, a discussion (brought up) by our white host went on about Nigerian pentecostal churches. I was quiet. Then it got to the point where the man said Nigerian churches has ATMs etc. Those other guys too went ahead saying all sorts of things. And here are research students who were supposed to be more fact-powered rather than assumptions and insinuations.

But at one point I couldn't take it anymore, I really don't know what triggered me to make corrections. So I started by telling the man there was no church I know with an ATM. Secondly, the leadership of mega churches motivates millions of Nigerian youths (and only those who have insight will understand this fact). I explained to him the role those ATM-churches play in the society, mentoring Nigerian youths.

The role of 'ATM-churches' as he was calling them in providing an avenue for young people to be responsible - you'll see them in church engaged in one activity or the other. Such is very important in a country where government can't provide any recreational amenities.

I explained to him how churches are turning out desirable graduates through their universities. Those universities which had added so much value to Nigeria's higher education.

The next thing that came from this professor was in agreement, suddenly he remembered and mentioned a research report he had read that said the churches had serious and meaningful impact.

Those other guys went silent. I left that place satisfied I wasn't an 'omo ale to fowo osi juwe ile' - Yorubas say that phrase when they want to make a point that you can't rubbish them. If only because I was Nigerian, I wouldn't allow him rubbish things bigger than him - in his country they don't have a 'vibrant church' like in Nigeria by the way.

Beyond that, I have also been a beneficiary. I was born in Our Lady ... Hospital, went to St ... Nursery School, then was in St John/Marys for JSS and then was in Wesley ... of Science for my SSS. Am sure I would have attended a private church varsity if there were any then.

So go on and liken churches to Ponzi, it just shows which side your brain(s) operates from.

Your story is misleading and so your conclusion is also misleading. At the end you did nothing to dispel the accusation of Churches (Nigerian) being ponzi schemes.

All those christian institutions you said you benefited from are not recognized as " Nigerian Churches". The typical definition of Nigerian churches are Pentecostal, prosperity preaching, demon casting, tongue speaking and most importantly, tithe emphasizing church, owned by one man, living extravagant life and who has been raised to a status of an infallible god.
Name one Nigerian church that provide the sort of free or cheap services you enjoyed ie hospitals, schools, etc.

Nigerian churches give very little to the youth. In fact they exploit the youth for tithes and offerings and their energy. I have seen youths walking the streets, distributing tracts, selling books and evangelizing for various churches without getting paid one naira. The amount of time nigerian youths waste for church activities would have been better put to use to improving their lives

Hanaway:
Christianity in itself is a concept that doesn't fail to amaze me. How can people be carrying out a monotonous exercise till eternity, I mean worshipping God for all eternity?

So when God's slated day of rapture comes, he will then separate the good from bad and plunge the rest into hell.

And he believes taking such action would shield his beloved heaven against evil? He might as well deny them their mind and make them mindless robots. On second thought, in that case, he shouldn't have given humans the gift of freewill right from the start.

The person who wrote the bible is really a daft.

Allah's paradise seems more promising. Atleast each man to his 77 virgins and there are wines in abundance.

Do not mind them, their God Yahweh or is it Jesus is really an egocentric, insecure and incompetent character. All he wants is praise and ego massaging, his sole reason to exist is to be praised.
His incompetence is legendary, he made heaven and its angels, due to his dictatorial and narcissistic tendencies, half of his angels rebelled against him, which lead to a civil war in heaven. He succeeded in driving them out of heaven. Then he created man and later regretted creating man and so decided to violently distroy man ( along with all other animals that had nothing to do with Man's sins) except one family and a couple of all animals . The descendants of that one family created more problems by sinning over and over again. He got so frustrated at man that he sent his only begotten to be sacrificed as an appeasement to him, in order to forgive man his sins.
There was no peace in heaven, there was no peace in Eden, there is no peace on earth now, what guarantee is there that there would be peace in heaven again after the rupture?

DoctorAlien:
[s][/s]

If you are devoid of understanding, don't mention me.

And you think you are full of understanding? Religion truly gives the ignorant a false sense of wisdom.

DoctorAlien:
What was Jesus' net worth when He was on earth? Can you tell me?

The Christian prays "give me this day my daily bread." GOD takes care of His children daily.

The greatest benefit of Christianity lies not in possessing money(which is the root of all evil), but in being at peace with GOD and having an assurance of Heaven.

Tell that lie to the hundreds that died at reigners church in Uyo last week, tell that to the hundreds that died at the collapsed synagogue church building last year. Millions of Christians face tragedies daily just like any other group of people.

No christian has an assurance of heaven, even the Bible says "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven"

oaroloye:
Having researched the background of this case (i.e. I read a couple of web pages, )

http://www.nigerianeye.com/2016/02/exposed-things-you-should-know-about.html?m=1

http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/02/breaking-news-supreme-court-okays-rev-king-to-die-by-hanging/

IT IS LOOKING LIKE A SETUP !

Apparently, the victim was actually burned in a generator accident.

The explanation is that this Preacher had exalted himself unnecessarily, and pissed off the wrong people.

Anyone calling himself "HIS HOLINESS" is automatically an arch-enemy of The Roman Catholic Church- because that is The Pope's title.

If he claimed to be "God," besides the Roman Catholic Church, many Protestants would probably feel it their duty to bring him down by any means necessary- even perjury.

I strongly doubt that someone badly burned could have given such an eloquent testimony- unless they were going to make it.

I think that either she never gave that testimony, and it is a forgery- or else she did (it should probably be on video media,) and then assassinated, having served her purpose. Both alternatives need to be eliminated.

His church is surely heavily infiltrated, up to the leadership level. This would explain why his deputy is babbling such silly threats.

The Goal is to alienate him from all other churches, so that no one will come to his aid.

If he is executed, the people who have infiltrated the church will quietly fold the church up. They currently appear to be his most ardent supporters. That is how they killed FRANKLIN HALL'S BODYFELT SALVATION Movement, SCIENTOLOGY, and, no doubt many others.

You read a few web pages and immediately concluded that rev. King was set up. You must have what I call conspiracy theory disorder. You see conspiracy in plain obvious events. Most Nigerians have followed the rev. King saga from inception. About 5 judges of the appeal court and about 7 justices of the supreme court unanimously agreed that rev. King commuted the crimes he was accused of, that is apart from the federal high court judge that sentenced him. A film featuring osuofia (Nkem owoh) has even been made of the whole episode. And you after reading a few web pages is screaming conspiracy.

Read more about the case. - http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17132/emeke-king-to-be-hanged

Eleven witnesses ( members of King's church), who were witnesses, some with burns testified against rev king. Evidences and exhibits were produced. So I do not know where you get the idea of conspiracy from. Rev king is too small for government or the Catholic church to notice, he has only one branch with less than 2,000 followers. So nobody knew him until the murder trial.

Omudia11:
Good... In the same vein mouth action isn't mentioned in clear terms in the bible but there are many scriptural references connoting that it is indeed a sin. One of such verses was quoted by a user above. The sin of masturbation also falls into this same caterogy.

What of hand action or is it hand job ( mastur.bation by a spouse), anal or even French kiss, are these allowed in Christianity?

oaroloye:
SHALOM!

I have never heard of this person nor this case before. But based on the information in the Original Post, I think that this is a False Accusation against a False Christian.

If a Christian Preacher is not fully Righteous, God will not protect them, when they are falsely-accused.

A Sign of False Christianity is: Calling for Doom upon one's perceived Enemies. Is he the first Martyr for YAHWEH and YAHSHUA?

Why would his follower say that sentencing his master would doom the country, if he were taught The True Gospel? What is so special about his Boss' life, that the whole country would be specially affected, were he sentenced to death?

Was this really the charge against the Pastor?

That he deliberately doused people with fuel, to set them on fire, inside his own home? That doesn't make any sense. Was his lawyer drunk?

It sounds like he accidentally burned some poor child to death, maybe playing around with fuel in the house- and the survivors committed perjury, to get revenge?

Are you joking? A case that went through the high court, appeal court and supreme court is what you are referring to as false accusation. Are you in Nigeria? If you were you will know the details of the case. The people that were doused with petrol testified against him, one was partially burnt. The lady that died testified against him in her hospital bed on camera before she died. And here you are forming Sherlock Holmes when even his lawyers have not come out to denounce the judgements.

I am sure that Rev King would attain divine status if he is killed, just like Jesus. His supporters would promote the idea that he was killed unjustly for saying the truth and that he really did not die, but would continue to protect his followers. Who know maybe after a few decades books might be written about with so much embellishments that he will attain Godlike status.

waldigit:
Hey have tried being close to God, the way you are to your earthly father?
Beloved I feel pain because I there too. Yet I have this for you: there more evidences for that God is there than the ones against it. Among those evidences for is YOU.

You seem to be missing what this whole thread is about. Why do we have to be close to our heavenly father, pray, fast, praise and pay tithes and offerings to his priests before he listens to us and gives us what we need? Meanwhile, our earthly father will feed, cloth, protect us and pay our school fees, even if we disobey him, fail to praise or worship him and even be rebellions against him.

I am sorry to say that there is nothing you can do for your friend. Your friend has been completely brainwashed by T.B. Joshua. Modern Christianity thrives on using brainwashing techniques to turn their members into mental and psychological slaves. They can only be free after some major psychological or mental shock or trauma that can reset their brains to default. In the alternative you can also learn the same brainwashing techniques employed by T B Joshua and co, and brainwash him in the opposite direction.

Read this article to have an idea of how brain washing techniques work;

http://theunboundedspirit.com/how-they-manipulate-your-mind-thought-control-persuasion-and-brainwashing-techniques/

So, to begin, I want to share a basic fact about brainwashing: IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF MAN, NO ONE HAS EVER BEEN BRAINWASHED AND REALIZED, OR BELIEVED, THAT HE HAD BEEN BRAINWASHED . Those who have been brainwashed will usually passionately defend their manipulators, claiming they have simply been “shown the light” … or have been transformed in miraculous ways.

The highlighted quote is germane to what we are discussing. A brainwashed person would defend his brainwasher till death.

I am sometimes amazed at how dishonest some Christians can be, you tell bare faced lies just to denegrate others who do not share your religious views.
A conflict that started way before Plutarco Elías Calles got into power is now be being attributed to him, under a very dubious heading of "atheist president of Mexico who killed 400 priests in just 4 years". First there is no evidence Calles was an atheist and no evidence the priests were kill to promote atheism or fulfil atheist obligations.
Secondly, the conflict was strictly a political struggle between the catholic church and the state which started with the promulgation of the liberal constitution in 1857 which attempted to oust the power of the Catholic church in state affairs. This lead to the Mexican revolution between 1910 - 1920. When Calles took over power in 1924, Mexico was on the verge of a civil war between the catholics and the government, and a civil war actually broke out two years after he took power, and you think it think 4000 catholic priests would not be killed during the civil war? Do you have an idea of how many government soldiers and supporters that were killed during the same period? And you are maliciously blaming atheists for killing priests.


Nothing surprises from dishonest Christians like the OP, they even claim Hitler, a baptised catholic who never renounced the religion, an atheists and so come out with very stupendous headings like atheists murdered hundreds of million during the second word war.

As I said to debunk all the bullshit the OP is propagating would not only take time, it would take volumes of thesis. I am having insomnia tonight so I have some time to waste.
Now let me take on scientific misconception being promoted by pseudoscientists like the OP;

This is the law of cause and effect.

Drop your car key and it falls to the ground. The effect is the key hitting the ground; the cause is gravity. Jump into a swimming pool on a hot day and you are refreshed. The effect is feeling refreshed; the cause is jumping into the water.

Cause and effect is so universal and proven, it carries the respectable tag of being a scientific law: causation, which states that every effect can be traced to a cause that happened before (or simultaneous to) the effect.

This is not so correct. What lay men generally refer to as causation or cause and effect is newton's second law, which deals with conservation of momentum. These break down on both the quantum and relativistic levels.
On the quantum level you can have a effect without a cause and vice versa. Till today, nobody knows the cause of why particular atoms of radioactive materials decay. What causes it to disintegrate? Nobody knows? What is known is that a half of the total number will disintegrate in a certain time.
Read this for more info;

Cause and effect went out of favor as a cornerstone of science about the time quantum mechanics was developed. Quantum mechanics is non-deterministic with events occurring randomly. Within the context of quantum mechanics, there is no reason or cause for an atom to decay at one time and not at another. The rise of quantum mechanics and the decline in the prominence of cause and effect are probably indeed cause and effect. However, even outside quantum mechanics there are problems with cause and effect. Much of physics, as Russell observed, does not explicitly use cause and effect. The equations work equally well forwards or backwards, deriving the past from present as much as the future from the past. Indeed, the equations of physics can even propagate spatially sideways rather than temporally forwards or backwards.
http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/06/08/cause-and-effect/

Also read up on virtual particles, they pop in and out of existence without any known reason or cause;

Virtual particles are subatomic particles that form out of "nothing" (vacuum fields conceptually analogous to lines of force between magnetic poles) for extremely short periods of time and then disappear again. Such particles permeate space, mediate particle decay, and mediate the exchange of the fundamental forces (electromagnetic, weak, strong, and—in accord with quantum theory—gravititational forces). Virtual particles are real and have measurable effects, but the same uncertainty principle that allows them to come into existence dictates that they cannot be directly observed.

Read more: Virtual Particles - Uncertainty, Short, Energy, and Principle - JRank Articles http://science.jrank.org/pages/7195/Virtual-Particles.html#ixzz4Sqvg7fZH

damogul:
^^^^^^^

Ladies and gentlemen this up there takes the cake as the dumbest post on this thread hands down.

The most ridiculous comment that jumps out there is this



I suppose Nairaland EVOLVED by itself without the intelligent intervention or input of seun.

Ladies and gentlemen NAIRALAND is going through random evolution. .... LMAO

Arguing with you guys is like arguing with someone with acute Alzheimer's disease. You seem to forget the subject of discussion or even the last point you raised, and then go off on a tangent bringing in other unrelated arguments.
This is what you said a few posts ago;

Evolution is a farce and a big lie.

you have been attacking the very concept of evolution all through your arguments, now you are asking if nairaland evolved by itself.
If you agree that evolution is a fact of life and indeed the universe, then we can start a new debate on factors or forces responsible for evolution - whether random chance or intelligent design.

damogul:
@ joyContraMundum and wirinet you called the OP a mumu and the thread Bullshit why dont you guys come and show us what made the OP bullshit and mumu?

Talk is cheap. Show us your scientific knowledge by refuting the OP. I dare you!

Believe me, I do not have the time to argue senselessly with the op, I am a very busy person. The OP has no clue on what he is arguing on, his primary aim is to attack anything evolution and promote his religious beliefs. He hate the very word evolution.

How can any rational human reject anything evolution? Evolution simply means change. Everything evolves or changes with time. Nothing can remain static for ever. Even the Biblical God has evolved over time. The God that created Adam and Eve, that they were hiding from after eating the fruit is different from the God at mount Sinai that visited the Israelites, and is different from Jesus who is now the God of Christians.
Languages evolves, the English spoken during the time king James wrote the king James version of the bible is different from the English spoken today, same for Arabic spoken during Mohammed's time and now. Telephones have evolved and will continue to evolve. Even nairaland has evolved. The appearance of nairaland today is different from nairaland of 5 years ago. EVERY THING EVOLVES.

The material universe started out with only a proton or hydrogen, today that hydrogen has evolved into more complex matter up to uranium. You people want to promote an unchanging and static universe. That is absurd.

[-]

jahsharon:
I think the committee members are mad. Kemi Adeosun does not have time for the useless committee. If her predecessor was involved in the deal, the committee should search for her predecessor's address and invite the puff-puff cheeked world bank fraudster to come and tell the committee how she and her gang of looters shared the money. Se Fini.

My brother I tire for this form of madness o.

The committee also frowned on the inability of the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, to attend the hearing and ordered that she must attend today’s hearing by all means, particularly as her predecessor was involved in the issue .

So because her predecessor was involved in the issue, she should face trial and punishment for any crime that her predecessor is alleged to have committed.

mayorchelsea:
Thank you for saying it loud and clear to that nigga with a short memory?Only a person with 2mb of brain memory would forget how PDP used Marilyn Oga to raid APC office claiming cloning of PVCs,how many persons did they charge to court?Or seizure of newspapers before they later compensated the editors? Or the withdrawal of Tambuwal after defecting from PDP?Or Mbu and Amaechi drama?

Do not mind PDP and its allies ( IPOB, NDA, etc), when Jonathan was using police to intimidate Governors that disagreed with him, intimidating the national assembly by locking up the gates of the national assembly complex, rigging elections in ekiti, they were cheerleading then. Now that what goes around has come around, they are screaming blue murder. Policing and security us an executive function in a democracy, it can never be handed over to the legislature.

Exercise in futility. A bill cannot wrest control of the police from the FG and hence the president, to do that will require constitutional amendment. The president as the commander in chief of the armed forces has control over all the armed forces, including the police.

Until this is ensured, there are likely to be many more Jammehs in Africa than anyone can imagine.

Useless article.
Until African presidents learn to conceded defeat in free and fair elections, there will be many more Gbagbos in Africa.

So you are saying that Africans presidents should remain in power until they die, and probably hand over to their sons because of fear of persecution if he hands over power to another person.

Jemmeh better leave power by January or he will become another Gbagbo.

billyG:
why is Dr okonjo Iweala not invited?

That is the mystery of the whole probe, why invite Kemi Adeosun and not Okonjo Iweala, who was not only the minister of finance but also the coordinating minster of the economy during the period under probe.