ndu_chucks:

WTF are you talking about? This is one of the most sensible bills introduced this year. Why don't you feel insulted when you are able to drive on roads because you are licensed to do so, but Fulani herdsmen who do not drive do not have access to the same roads? abeg make we hear word.

Dudu_Negro:

Reserve comments. I dont know if the suggestion will be adopted or not. If it is then you can present your feelings about it. For now, I think miyetti Allah has won and it might be too late reversing the hands of clock....but I wish I can clasp my fingers around the throat of Karimi.

ujchief: I'm moving a motion for the cancellation/ postponement of the december edition, we've had a lot in our hands this december, least we present a half baked debate of low quality.
All in favour say ai. . .

Jarus:

I have to agree.

GARRI (x7):
LAZINESS in high places.....

ogugua88: ^^^You know us na. Na so we dey prepare for August Olympics in May lol.



It's already 28 December. The debate is supposed to hold within 24 hours and we have only two debaters who are in support of the topic.

Demdem:

The topic itself makes me puke.

CFCfan:

Why does it make u puke? Is it too boring?

Demdem:

This topic is not appealing jor. I for one ain't interested. Finishing the year with such a boring topic after two earlier explosives isn't the way to go.
Why not try this:

Seun's decision to cancel hall of shame thread on politics section; wise or daft decision.

That's more like it.

ogugua88: ^^^You know us na. Na so we dey prepare for August Olympics in May lol.



It's already 28 December. The debate is supposed to hold within 24 hours and we have only two debaters who are in support of the topic.

Demdem:

This topic is not appealing jor. I for one ain't interested. Finishing the year with such a boring topic after two earlier explosives isn't the way to go.
Why not try this:

Seun's decision to cancel hall of shame thread on politics section; wise or daft decision.

That's more like it.

Obinoscopy:

I wonder what's your definition of 'explosive' or 'boring'. But I do know the issue of downsizing the civil service did cause an uproar when it was suggested by Sanusi with people taking sides in the argument.

Bear it in mind that the essence of these debates is to encourage intellectualism, to enlighten the populace and to bring about human empowerment and national development. Any topic that won't achieve such should not be encouraged. Thank you.

Demdem:

That we have redundant civil servants that does nothing is an undebatable fact.
That we have to get rid of these ones and make the service much more efficient is also a fact.
I doubt if peeps were neccesary against the message but the messager itself. That lies the problem then.

Obinoscopy:

U are entitled to ur opinion. However it would be wrong to say that your opinion is undebatable.

Granted we have inefficiency in our civil service, but what we need to do is make the civil service more efficient by removing those lazy ones and replacing them with hardworking and intelligent ones rather than sacking half of the civil servants.

Demdem:

Whether half, three quarters or one third, its immaterial to me as long as dead woods are flushed out completely and efficiency put in play. i don't think we should start debating that.

Obinoscopy:

You've said it the right way! You don't THINK we shld be debating that. You are entitled to ur own opinion, as a matter of fact everybody is.

Saying that downsizing the civil service is undebatable is very wrong and unscholarly

Demdem:

That we have redundant civil servants that does nothing is an undebatable fact.
That we have to get rid of these ones and make the service much more efficient is also a fact.
I doubt if peeps were neccesary against the message but the messager itself. That lies the problem then.

ujchief: Ladies and gentlemen, the debate did finally take place. Demdem trashed it out with Obinoscopy, with Demdem suporting the motion for a downcut in civil service and Obinoscopy against the motion.
Its an in-house debate, no moderator, no judge, no frontpage. The audience are allowed to throw in their comments, questions and most especially, score the debators.
Thanks

u arent serious jor

Obinoscopy:

I wonder what's your definition of 'explosive' or 'boring'. But I do know the issue of downsizing the civil service did cause an uproar when it was suggested by Sanusi with people taking sides in the argument.

Bear it in mind that the essence of these debates is to encourage intellectualism, to enlighten the populace and to bring about human empowerment and national development. Any topic that won't achieve such should not be encouraged. Thank you.

afam4eva: I want to thank and appreciate Jarus for holding forth thus far as far as the monthly debates are concerned. It's a lot of work i tell you.

I think we should start preparing for the January debates. Pls let's keep the suggestions for this month's topic coming.

What do you guys think about "Should State of Residence be replaced with State of Origin?"

afam4eva: I want to thank and appreciate Jarus for holding forth thus far as far as the monthly debates are concerned. It's a lot of work i tell you.

I think we should start preparing for the January debates. Pls let's keep the suggestions for this month's topic coming.

What do you guys think about "Should State of Residence be replaced with State of Origin?"

Obinoscopy:

I don't seem to get ur topic: State of Residence be replaced with State of Origin: where? In our constitution? Pls clarify, thanks.

afam4eva: I want to thank and appreciate Jarus for holding forth thus far as far as the monthly debates are concerned. It's a lot of work i tell you.

I think we should start preparing for the January debates. Pls let's keep the suggestions for this month's topic coming.

What do you guys think about "Should State of Origin be replaced with State of Residence?"

Shollypopz:
I support the motion in bold. How do we sign up to become one of the debaters?

olawalebabs: Afam, I think we have enough support for the topic now.