BluntBoy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BluntBoy's Profile › BluntBoy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 340 pages)
safarigirl:You wrote that it is a social experiment, but when Ike steals to cover ground, you rationalize the act by claiming that this show is a game. You people should make up your mind. If it is a social experiment, then Ike should be castigated for stealing to service his ambition. |
Menance:Perhaps, he is a DeeperLife member ![]() |
yunafa:OK, thought the cameras were automatic and placed at vantage positions. |
yunafa:Who is this Kayode guy that everyone always talks about? |
peacesamuel94:I will make a list of female authors whose output dwarf Adichie's small outputs of 3 novels. I will also include female writers who invented literary styles that revolutionized literature. First, there is Virginia Woolf who invented the stream of consciousness narrative style which would borrowed by literary giants like James Joyce and the Nobel Prize winner Faulkner. Georgette Heyes invented the genre of Regency Romance. Gertrude Stein provided the deceptively simple style of writing that influenced the male writers like Hemingway (a Nobel prize winner). Then there is Judy Blume known for breaking the norms with taboo subject matters like birth control. Then another rebellious writer, Jane Austen known for her sarcastic attack of perfectionist Victorians. Mary Shelley gave the world the Frankenstein's monster. JK Rowling gave us the most famous wizard in the whole world. Toni Morrison known for perspective switch and for her blazing sarcastic attack of racism. A writer with a unique style of writing. The first and only black woman to have ever won a Nobel prize in Literature. Nadine Gordimer same as Toni Morrison also contributed her voice against racism. She was too good they couldn't deny her a Nobel prize. There are thousands others whose outputs and memorable characters and styles gave us a large portion of the Literature we know today. Do you know that it is a widely claimed that Mary Shelley invented science fiction? Her books Frankenstein and The Last Man laid the foundation of science fiction as a literary genre. |
budaatum:She was never nominated for a Nobel Prize. And no, she is not the Marie Curie of her own time. She is not even a George Elliot or a Jane Austen. |
djon78:Perhaps, you should read the definition you provided and use it to fault my argument. That is better than this cowardly attempt. How am I wrong? I am willing to learn. |
budaatum:You are very correct, although intelligence and creativity are not as straightforwardly interwoven as you have put it. Moreover, I have not even remotely implied that Adichie is not intelligent. I only wrote that she is not one of the most intelligent women in the world. She is creative, no doubt, but that is not a proof of an overly intelligent being. You would be surprised that her IQ is only barely above average. You can't compare her to someone like Marie Curie. |
peacesamuel94:Bro, you are just putting words in my mouth. I never said intelligence makes one superior to another, as these words can be relative. All I did was differentiate creativity from intelligence. Einstein could be far more intelligent than Shakespeare, not necessarily more superior. My argument was never to rank intelligence over creativity. Someone wrote that all it took him to conclude that Adichie is one of the most intelligent women in the world is a novel. I had to point out that that was not enough while also trying to differentiate creativity from intelligence. There are lot of creative people in the world from shoe cobblers to tailors to fiction writers to musicians, but all these don't translate to high level of intelligence. |
peacesamuel94:You were the one who first used the word when you wrote that she would go down as one of the most intelligent women to contribute to literature. Suddenly, you forget. How should I now take you seriously? ![]() Perhaps, you might want to show me a post of mine that mentioned contribution before yours? |
peacesamuel94:First of all, you have to clarify what you think "contribution" is? Yes, intellectual was qualifying something. Was intelligent not also supposed to qualify something? |
peacesamuel94:You might want to read this list of the top 10 most intelligent people in the world: https://www.wonderslist.com/10-most-intelligent-people/ While there is at least a writer on the list, the list is dominated by scientists or people inclined to science. And mind you, I never implied that scientists are intelligent simply because of vague concepts (whatever your point was). I am not like TSRC who thinks Adichie is intelligent simply from reading one of her 3 novels. Scientists solve problems, which is one attribute of a very intelligent person. For instance, the scientist Henri Becquerel discovered Radioactivity. Radioactive iodine, for instance, is used to treat thyroid cancer. Alexander Fleming discovered the antibiotics penicillin. Electricity can be generated from uranium. Uranium was discovered by a scientist. |
peacesamuel94:You people need to get out more, or just read more. For Christ's sake, even intellectual and intelligent are still not the same thing. Adichie is not even one of the most intelligent female writers from Africa, let alone in the world to ever contribute to literature. She is not even remotely one of the most intelligent women generally. She is just an overhyped writer with 3 novels, 1 collection of short stories, and a small non-fiction book. |
TSRC:Perhaps, you don't read a lot. That is why you are stuck on this bland lecture. Read more, my friend. Ever listened to an economist recently? |
TSRC:When did Harvard and Yale describe her as intelligent? Even the badly written The Da Vinci Code is a best seller. Does that mean that Dan Brown, in spite of his poor grammar and blatant historical inaccuracies, is one of the most intelligent men? Best sellers are exactly what they are. They do well in the market not necessarily because of their brilliance. |
TSRC:So giving great speeches is now another genius stuff? I don't suppose Einstein was an orator and yet he was such an intelligent fellow. Adichie is a good writer. But frankly, there is nothing special about her 3 novels. Her themes never go beyond love, racism, and feminism. She has never tried anything new. Her novels read at best as Mills and Boons, only more serious, especially Americanah where she tried to put racism and hair into a bland love story. |
TSRC:Read my first post. I wrote that intelligence and creativity share a relationship. But to say Adichie is one of the most intelligent persons by virtue of a novel is mere exaggeration. As a matter of fact, writers (aside technical writers) are not known to perform very well on the intelligence scales. There is hardly many things they can manage. Leonardo da Vinci was a polymath. He was as much of a scientist as he was an artist. And no, Beethoven and the others were never regarded as some of the most intelligent. They were described as very creative. If you were talking about some of the most intelligent people to ever live, you would be talking about people like Pythagoras, Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus, and many others whose works revolutionized learning and solved problems. |
TSRC:Check my post again. I am not ranking them. Rather, I am explaining their differences. Being creative does not automatically mean that you have a high IQ. That is the point. My intentions were never to rank one above the other. |
Fingerprinter:There is a relationship between creativity and intelligence Adichie is certainly very creative, but she is certainly not one of the most intelligent by virtue of a book. If you are looking for the most intelligent people on earth, you might want to look in the fields of science such as mathematics, physics, and medicine. One difference between Adichie and a Nobel prize winner in chemistry is that Adichie is able to refurbish old stories and tell them afresh (creativity), while the Nobel prize winner in chemistry is able to apply acquired knowledge into solving problems (intelligence). Intelligence plays a huge part in creativity but being creative does not equate to having a super high IQ. |
blackpanda:Someone said they even came with petrol bombs. |
Truth be told, Akpeyi cannot go beyond his capacity. He is a good goalkeeper, no doubt, but he is never going to be able to manage stage fright. It is understandable if the chap Uzoho still shows stage fright sometimes, but it is unpardonable for Akpeyi with all his years of experience to still be jittery. He should have been able to keep Mahrez's freekick out of the net. The ball was right in his face. Yet, he let it go in. That was not a mistake, but stage fright. He has nothing new to offer. It is sad that in a footballing country like Nigeria which has a rich and enviable footballing history, we are struggling to get a replacement for Carl Ikeme. We went to the World Cup with a newbie goalkeeper and a reserve team of Akpeyi and a match rusty Ezenwa. It doesn't show any form of seriousness on the part of Agu. Yes, he gave us a wonderful goalkeeper like Enyeama, but he seems to be contended with his achievement as the one who gave us Enyeama. He should move on from that achievement and give us another great goalkeeper. When Enyeama kept against England in 2002, everyone saw the potentials in him. Even though he was young, people knew he was the future of our goalkeeping department. It was not like he was forced on us. But this Akpeyi is being forced on us simply because Agu is contended about going on and on about how he discovered Enyeama. Enyeama is retired now. Agu should give us another world class goalkeeper (one with potentials and a desire to grow and become world class). The Super Eagles deserve better. Even Benin Republic have a better goalkeeper than us presently. |
aanuoluwami14:It doesn't take any form of genius to avoid/prevent a crash. Men have been doing it for ages without news. They have been doing it on the road, the air, rail, and in space. |
Shaprara:That is not confidence. A confident person is one who does not look down on other people. A confident person would rather say, "Even if they evict me, I will still be successful/big. An arrogant/cocky person would say, "Even if they evict me, I will still be bigger than all the other housemates." Deep inside, an arrogant person suffers from low self esteem and is always pushed to put other's down to validate their own supposed strength. A confident person believes in his own strength and does not need to put anyone down to feel good. He does not need to rubbish anyone's strength because he knows he is strong in his own way. Many people (like you) confuse cockiness or arrogance for confidence. They are two different things. This does not mean that an arrogant person is without skills. Sometimes, an arrogant person may even be more skillful than a confident person but due to the knack to compare with others, they fail they see their own true worth. |
Basher8583:MMA is worse. I wonder how they allow MMA as a spectator sport. |
Jakumo:You have said nothing but the TRUTH. Whenever a boxer dies, there is always a revisit of public condemnation. Very soon, boxing would have to be banned. |
starbuck:You are confusing boxing with World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE). Boxing is real, but WWE is scripted. |
He had to carve his hair and groom his beard for that moment. Local man is heartbroken. He just can't can. |
I wouldn't call it a mysterious selection process. If you live in Nigeria, it shouldn't surprise you. Every selection process whether employment or academic admission are hardly ever largely open/transparent, especially in a corrupt country like Nigeria. For example, let us say there is a pool of 1 million Nigerians to choose from to make up 20 contestants for a reality show. 1-2 slots may be reserved for these unknown Nigerians who have no big name contacts or money. While the remaining 18-19 slots would be automatically reserved for people with contacts. These people with money or contacts may not even need to audition or may do a pretentious auditioning to fool people into believing that the auditioning process is fair. |
Very hilarious. Only a few people managed to look in their direction ![]() |
In a sane country, a former terrorist can never be allowed to contest even a local government elections, even as councillor. A repentant terror should still be convicted, even if for a day prison sentence. And according to many constitutions of nearly all the countries of the world, a person who has been convicted of crimes against humanity cannot contest presidential election. However, anything goes in Nigeria. |
CapitanS: ![]() |
AroleOduduwa2:Are you kidding me? Human rights lawyer , Mr. Femi Falana ( SAN ) , has petitioned the National Human Rights Commission demanding a probe into alleged killings of about 492 members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria , also known as Shi’ ites , by both the Army and the police since 2014. https://punchng.com/army-police-have-killed-492-shiites-falana/ |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 340 pages)

?? There is unusual movement under their duvet but trust Kayode....he comot from there