Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 9:56am On Aug 21, 2019 |
LordReed: LoL. My dear buda doest thou willst to hide the mountain? Will thou not wish me to climb too? That I may look upon the talking burning bush? You can not climb my mountain my Lord. And it is a common error that many make that turns them into sheepies! I take you up the mountain then lie to you that my bush is burning and is talking to me, likely after telling you you are not holy enough so must stand over there by the side while the burning bush talks to me on your behalf. And guess what I'd tell you the burning bush said? "Eat grass". "Drink bleach". "Give all your wealth to me and God will bless you"! Or have you not been reading Niflheim? No, my Lord! You shall not be a sheepie. What you will very kindly do is find your own mountain, climb up it, see your own bush burn and hear what it has to say to you. For that which thou seek is not here or there or inside buda. The Kingdom of God is within you, my Lord. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Let us Live as One? GOD Has a Reason For Keeping As Nations/societies by budaatum: 9:43am On Aug 21, 2019 |
So, it is God who does not want us to love one another, according to this? And satan does?
Funny how some take that which is godly and evil spin it!
Thank you tedelah for your response above. Perhaps that will open ops eyes.
|
Christianity Etc › Re: A Question For The Theists by budaatum: 9:18am On Aug 21, 2019 |
Image123: When I said the world, i was not referring to the planet earth. I'm referring to the reality that we face every day, the love, the hate, the hunger, the betrayals, the luck, the positioning, the pain. These are not exact science but are more real to humanity than facts like 2+2=4 which atheists worship. Oh I know. My response was to present a cross purpose where words don't mean the same to parties in a discussion. Your careful choice of the word "world" gave you away. It implies the subjectively experienced world, as in existence as perceived by the subject, and not the supposed objective one I presented in my retort. I'm in discussion with my Lord where I'm being asked to provide objective evidence for a subjective reality, and despite his vast knowledge of me, he expects me to fall for that silly trick of arguing my subjective against his objective. I think theists need to recognise this and stop trying to objectively prove God instead of silly ploys like the one presented here. Not only are such attempts in error as they try to turn God into an object, they make theists sound stupid too because it shows a lack of understanding that their experience of God is subjective. But much worse is that in trying to objectify the Lord God Almighty, one sins! Image123, I buda bow!
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 9:02am On Aug 21, 2019 |
LordReed: Where and what is the evidence? My Lord! This is like you asking me to show you where my wealth is stored and how I got it! Why should I? To what end? What makes you think any evidence I have for myself may mean anything to you? |
Politics › Re: We Stopped EFCC From Planting Foreign Currency In Ambode’s House —lawyers by budaatum: 12:07am On Aug 21, 2019 |
What do you mean, "nothing like that happened", assuming any of this is real? Did you, Oyedepo, keep the lawyers phones or not? |
Christianity Etc › Re: A Question For The Theists by budaatum: 12:03am On Aug 21, 2019 |
Image123: Hehehehehehehehe. These fellows think Objectivity is superior and objectivity is reality. Is the world objective? The world actually is objective since its state of existence has nothing to do with subjective subjects. What we say about it though is subjective, since we are subjects and not objects. As to whether objective is superior, that would first depend on superior to what, and be like asking if a stone is superior to subject or object you. What do you think? |
Politics › Re: So When Will Hausa Produce A President In Nigeria? by budaatum: 11:37pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
oyatz: Not a very similar case sir. 1) Before colonial rule and subsequent creation of the Old Eastern region in 1951, the Ijaw and Igbo tribes were independent of each other.
The Fulanis in the N/West have ingrained themselves into the larger host population (the Hausa) through the Caliphate system. The Fulanis through the indirect rule of the colonial era have become the privileged class in the North.
2) Ijaw and Igbo haven't assimilated into one ethnic group. Each maintain separate identities. The Hausas and Fulanis obviously haven't assimilated into one ethnic group either. Except to those who sit down south thinking everyone in the North is one ethnic group! There's a word for such people. Anyone wanna guess what it is? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Is The Word Of God Artificial? by budaatum: 11:29pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
geoworldedu: If according to the religious people, God could create a natural mountain, valley, sea, lake, sky, ocean, breeze, birds, human, water, etc, why did God have to leave his Words to be written by men? Funny. Another "if" argument. I somehow feel people use that word to set up straw. One thing some miss is God is actually a way of understanding things. No one after all has exactly said what God is. Scripture even warns that one should not make images of God, the exact words being "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth". Yet, that precisely is what many tend to do without realising that it is not so much that you should not create images of God, but that you possibly can't create an image of God. I guess humans can't live without their so called, objective reality. Scripture, is an image of God. It is a tale weaved by us humans to share our understanding of whatever God may be. It, itself is not God, but the finger pointing in the general direction of what God has been understood to be by its writers and which forms the idea of God that many have. But as Jesus is written to have said, Those who live by bread alone will clearly be malnourished. As to Scripture, it is written that If all the trees of the earth were pens and the oceans ink, with many more oceans for replenishing them, the colloquy of God would never come to end. He is indeed all-mighty and all-wise". The wise, or less wise, in this context, do not assume the little they know is everything. |
Christianity Etc › Re: An Irrefutable Evidence For God Specially Meant For The Atheists And Agnostics by budaatum: 11:22pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
johnydon22: I do not think it is okay for us to address a logically consistent argument with strawmans Yet, the entire argument op presented is illogical inconsistent straw, to me! Johny, please note, I am not really into arguing for whether there is a God or not. It is irrelevant to me either way, and personally, on the assumption that there is a God, what, pray tell, can I possibly present as evidence when we'd likely not even agree on a definition of God? Have I not been on the other side of that argument on here for eons? I do not agree that God can be proven or disproven by logic and all we would end up doing is strawmanning one another. Funny though how the strawman is often the one accused first when the truth usually is that both parties are equally as guilty as the other. We will evolve, I promise. |
Christianity Etc › Re: An Irrefutable Evidence For God Specially Meant For The Atheists And Agnostics by budaatum: 11:13pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
johnydon22: Actually No, you are assuming the God the OP is talking when the OP doesn't at all imply any particular deity. The OP's argument is based on God as an ontological necessity. (Assuming that the OP is talking about the Jewish God or any God in religion is a strawman) God, any God, is not an ontological necessity. God exists or doesn't exist for each individual. Or how many people do you see claiming a God ontologically exists for them? Sounds like a tree can't fall in a forest and make a sound unless someone were there to see and hear it, to me. |
Christianity Etc › Re: An Irrefutable Evidence For God Specially Meant For The Atheists And Agnostics by budaatum: 10:58pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
johnydon22: I'm starting to think you are not reading people's argument to understand them Buda, you are reading to reply. Do know that I read his argument and did not reply until you asked why no one had replied, and my response was to tell you why not. The entire argument is based on assumptions that I disagreed with but saw no reason to respond to until you asked why not. But if you think as you do above, then so be it. |
Christianity Etc › Re: An Irrefutable Evidence For God Specially Meant For The Atheists And Agnostics by budaatum: 10:53pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
johnydon22: Anything eternal is unchanging
Anything changing is not eternal.
That's the premise. It is not a premise that my evolving mind shares since nothing in the entire universe has been shown to be eternal or unchanging. The sun isn't eternal and is changing as is the universe, and God, which is what the op is trying to prove with his argument, has obviously changed and will continue to change over time. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 10:45pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
rekinomtla: Don't think the definition you cited above defines "belief" like that though, but guess we can agree to disagree. As I said, "for me". I present it not as an idea anyone else must share. |
Christianity Etc › Re: An Irrefutable Evidence For God Specially Meant For The Atheists And Agnostics by budaatum: 10:44pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
johnydon22: Actually, it isn't. It's assumptions are logically consistent.
It is called argument of contingency.
If everything is contingent, an infinite regression of contingencies is logically absurd therefore there must be a necessarily thing at the apex of it all.
So, it is either there is an infinite regression of contingent causes which is absurd
Or
There is an eternal thing (necessary thing) that started it all.
So, this isn't an absurd premise.
He didn't mention the bible God or any particular deity at all.
He argued for God in an ontological sense.
Where did this come from?
Did you understand his argument at all?
I'm not sure you did.
Anything eternal is unchanging
Anything changing is not eternal.
That's the premise.
His conclusion therefore, since the universe changes, it cannot be eternal.
He explained this to detail.
(You can refute his position by providing an equally logically consistent alternative to its fundamental assumptions)
I'm starting to think you are not reading people's argument to understand them Buda, you are reading to reply.
Actually it does follow the premises precisely and the argument is quite solid.
It is an ontological argument of contingency.
1. Everything in the universe is contingent. 2. There cannot be an infinite regression of contingencies 3. There must be a necessary thing (non-contingent thing) 4. This contingent thing is God.
His argument is actually sound. Your reply seem to be replying something else. The argument of contingency is made from "propositions that are neither true under every possible valuation nor false under every possible valuation. It is also known as the cosmological argument in which the existence of a unique being, generally seen as some kind of god, is deduced or inferred from facts or alleged facts concerning causation, change, motion, contingency, or finitude in respect of the universe as a whole or processes within it, and is traditionally known as an argument from universal causation and an argument from first cause." Note the assumptions. One assumes a first cause then weaves an argument based on that premise to prove a first cause, which if done in mathematics is called wuruwuru to the answer, which I'm willing to overlook. He won't be the first with this argument, nor would he be the last. It does fall on its face though as you know. Hear you: " If everything is contingent, an infinite regression of contingencies is logically absurd therefore there must be a necessarily thing at the apex of it all." Why "if"? How can you possibly state that the logical conclussion of the apparent infinite regression is absurd "if", to justify your first cause? What "if everything is not contingent"? Why is it absurd to assume it might not be? To avoid the logical regressive conclussion? Is that how you understand logic to work, make it up with an "if", so "therefore", then "must be"? Is that logical to you? I've argued against it here, and here and see no point in engaging further with those who deny the logical conclusion of their own assumption which is an infinite regression on a baseless assumption of "if". It is a position that stops further consideration though, and in my opinion, limits God. Just imagine what might be gained from delving further into the cause of the causer, then the cause of the causer of the causer ad infinitum. We might be wiser for it is what I think, after all, the idea of an Almighty God did not start at Genesis 1. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 10:01pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
LordReed: How do you know this? I know because I sought and found evidence for God that satisfied me sufficiently for me to know. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 10:00pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
rekinomtla: According to the definition above you do believe in the existence of God because you accept the proposition that God exists, right?
The lack of evidence/proof part is not a necessity in the above definition.You can believe something with or without proof, it's just that people often use the term "believe" to refer to something they accept without proof. No. I do not believe in the existence of God, nor do I accept some mere proposition. I'll quote what I said again, the relevant portion, at least. budaatum: I do not believe things I know. I either know them or I don't. If I believe rain is falling, its because its not falling on my head or I'd know rain is falling. I do not believe my mother is my mother because I know she is my mother. I do not believe God exists because I know God exists. If I believe something, it is because I have no evidence and merely hold it as a belief. When I have evidence, I know. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 7:50pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
rekinomtla: That depends how you define what it is to "believe" something.
Yes but what I mean by "believe" seems to differ considerably from what you mean by it. For me belief and truth are conditions of knowledge, the standard view in epistemology. Well, the standard definition of belief is: 1. an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof. 2. trust, faith, or confidence in (someone or something). So either it's used wrong, or those who believe actually do accept, trust, have faith, or are confident without proof that God exists, which sounds pretty weak to me. But I guess its a throwback to my having been an atheist. Evidence is just that much important to me, and the thought of worshipping a God I have no proof or evidence for is just laughable, to me. There's a thread here somewhere asking what would convince me as an atheists that God exists. I'll look it up and post a link to it. I remember then I said God created me an atheist and knows what to do to make me a theist. I guess God heard me and here we are. I do not believe things I know. I either know them or I don't. If I believe rain is falling, its because its not falling on my head or I'd know rain is falling. I do not believe my mother is my mother because I know she is my mother. I do not believe God exists because I know God exists. Please know that this only applies to me. As you said, it "depends how you define what it is to "believe" something". My definition is above. |
Travel › Re: Russians Eating Nigerian Jollof Rice For The First Time by budaatum: 6:31pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
They can't seem to get enough of it!
Good one afro! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 6:23pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
rekinomtla: You don't have to say that, it follows from your definition of theism. You define it as the "acknowledgement of the existence of God", that theists are people that know God exists. Please reki. I speak for myself and do not know the hearts of others. My definition applies to me, and not to anyone else unless they claim it for themselves. In this thread, I stated the opinion that it is stupid to believe and not seek to understand so one can know how to make use of the power of Christ that is in one, and I wondered if that power is in one at all if all one does is believe. In this thread was I questioned extensively for my stance. And just today did I again state my position on the same topic. Ask them, instead of generalising and tarring everyone with one brush. Most theists that I have come across say they "believe that God exists". And most atheists say they "believe God does not exist". I, buda do not do believe! rekinomtla: So what is a theist now then? One who believes or one who knows God exists? If you pay attention on here you will find that everyone defines themselves according to their own understanding. Even you say you believe! Read you saying it below! rekinomtla: Yep I am a theist because theism is the belief in the existence of a deity or deities. And you acknowledge the apparent weirdness of my use of "know and knew" as seen below. rekinomtla: it never said it was foolish, I just said it seems weird/odd how you using the terms know/knew. If it was not weird and odd, would you say it was weird and odd? Do know, buda is weird and odd. Some say it is the demons in me. I do not believe that God exists. I know that God exists for me. |
Christianity Etc › Re: N/A for now............... .......... For now for now for now by budaatum: 5:54pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
Shepherd00: You have insulted me directly and indirectly, have I reacted to them? I know you are at all times trying to say Christians are not what they preach. But you fail to understand that Jesus doesn't expect only Christians to be upright in Character.
You throw condescending jibes at me, which if I pick them and throw back at you, we'd be brawling here, but each time I walk away. As I keep walking away, you have assumed that I am weak, or as you call me stupid. But, I understand. Actions they say, speaks louder than words. In other words, 'the content of a man's heart is reflected when upset. Yours shows clearly. Shepherd! Please! Below was you! Shepherd00: Buda, my understanding of your use of 'understanding' here has to do with your intellect and that is merely flesh, and profits you nothing as far as spiritual things are concern. Here was my response: budaatum: Then let that be your understanding, "that my understanding is merely flesh". Whether it profits me need not be your concern since you would not be standing by God when I am judged.
I must say though that it amuses me that you presume to know my profit as far as spiritual things are concerned. Have you been watching my fruits, I wonder. After which for a full 8 pages in this one thread and in other threads, you harangued me as if I had said you must do as I say! Did you not understand when you said "Budaatum, the internet does not lie or forget"? Or do you wish to claim I have gone and edited my comments? |
Politics › Re: So When Will Hausa Produce A President In Nigeria? by budaatum: 5:42pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
nameo: Plzz can you share the link to this article by this northerner? Sorry. It was sent direct to me by email. A search might show where else its been posted and in this thread. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 5:38pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
rekinomtla: So you telling me you knew there were no gods when you were an atheist. But now you know that there is a God. Sounds pretty weird how you know things.
But according to your definition of theism, they knew there was a God when they were theists. I never said "they knew there was a God when they were theists"! In fact, most atheists claim to "believe there is no God", while theists tend to " believe there is a God". Or have you heard any atheist or theist saying they know there is or no God? I bet even you believe that God exists. Are you not a theist? God things are usually weird, foolishness to those who comprehendeth, someone wrote. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Egyptian god (ra) Allegedly Talking with New-agers by budaatum: 5:28pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
Sounds like all the Gods are awakening. Here is a more recent contact. |
Christianity Etc › Re: N/A for now............... .......... For now for now for now by budaatum: 5:23pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
Shepherd00: Did you or did you not say YHWH didn't create man to worship Him? Did you or did you not say We are not to worship God? Budaatum, the internet does not lie or forget, you can edit your comments but the ones that have been quoted, are still there.
Again, keep saying it who knows, maybe I may truly become a liar some day. Shepherd! Every time you make these false accusations against me and I ask you for evidence you have failed to provide any. Below is a copy of the conversation you and I had on the topic! The bold is so you miss it not. And muttley might tell you about my attitude to editing my posts! Shepherd00: Worship is not only singing and dancing and bowing down before Him. It is everything we do as commanded by God. Our relationship with others is worship to God. Our living in peace with each other, giving to each other and looking out for each other is worship. Seems we are in agreement with what I've been saying all along! Shepherd00: God does not need my worship? And then you go and ask this silly question Shepherd! If God needs to be worshipped by you "Being fruitful and increasing in number, and filling the earth and subduing it, and ruling over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground, would you, Shepherd, if you have any sense, not even be begging God to please let you worship God? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 5:17pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
rekinomtla: So you never really knew that, you merely believe there were no gods. You thought you knew but you didn't really.
So what about other atheists on this forum? Do they also know there is a God? Please do not put your own spin over what I clearly say or you will not understand whatever I might mean! It was not something I "thought. I categorically knew that Gods did not exist. And you will have to ask those other atheists on this forum what they know or not since like all theists are not the same so are all atheists not the same. Most of them do say though they "believe God does not exist". |
Christianity Etc › Re: Jesus Appeared To Me For The First Time In Decades Last Night. by budaatum: 5:07pm On Aug 20, 2019*. Modified: 9:22am On Aug 21, 2019 |
Intelligent people sit in class and learn while teaching others.
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 4:59pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
rekinomtla: So would that mean all atheists on this forum were never actually theists? I was an atheist who had never been a theist. I knew there were no gods. If I could have existed then others might too. Also, one may believe in God's existence and not worship God. The Lord Lord people spring to mind, and some define them as atheists. |
Christianity Etc › Re: An Irrefutable Evidence For God Specially Meant For The Atheists And Agnostics by budaatum: 4:54pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
johnydon22: Why aren't they people on this nice thread? Because its full of silly assumptions! Abdulgaffar22: PREMISE 1; Something must be eternal (i:e always exist and infinitely old) Why must something be eternal? Do things not evolve into being? Even scripture says everything was void, so what is eternal about it? Abdulgaffar22: PREMISE 2 ; Anything that is ETERNAL (i:e something that is always exist and infinitely old) would not have a CHANGING characteristic. See? According to op, things don't change over time, yet pick up a Bible and read how a wrathful God changes to a loving Jesus over time! Abdulgaffar22: PREMISE 3 ; Universe (or nature) has a CHANGING characteristic. Now see. An admission of change over time that was denied in premise 2 and 3! Abdulgaffar22: But Premise 1 is perfectly true. Therefore, God must actually exist. And see a conclusion that does not quite follow from the premises stated! Or are things true because one says things are true? I see op as creating an image to justify the existence of God, and gods that need image justification cannot exist!
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 4:39pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
rekinomtla: Theism is the belief in the existence of deities so anyone who believes in gods are by definition theists. Your definition leaves me in limbo! Theism is the acknowledgement of the existence of God. One may not 'believe' but know instead. Jesus, for instance was a theist. He did not merely believe but knew his Father was in Heaven. |
Politics › Re: So When Will Hausa Produce A President In Nigeria? by budaatum: 4:35pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
budaatum: A WAKE-UP CALL AND BLUNT TRUTH TO MY FELLOW NORTHERN BROTHERS.
Written by Hassan Stan-Labo
Bᴀɴᴅɪᴛʀʏ ᴀɴᴅ Bᴏᴋᴏ ʜᴀʀᴀᴍ : Tʜᴇ Nᴏʀᴛʜ sʟᴇᴘᴛ ғᴏʀ ᴛᴏᴏ ʟᴏɴɢ!
"The north must wake up now. It must not murder sleep.
The north saw nothing coming. Population was deemed strength. But it should have watched when others slowed down in breeding. It bred too many children and didn’t do much to care for them. They roamed the streets. Yet, it bred more. They forsook schools. And took to begging . Yet, it bred more. Those children, many of them, have gone feral. Now,the north cannot sleep. The north slept for too long.
Northern politicians lived in bubbles, in distant cities. Some governors literally ruled by ‘Wifi’. When they bothered to return to their state capitals, unemployed youths lined the streets to cheer them. In their narcissism , they said it was popularity. The naive jobless youths in their ignorance, considered them their own share of national big men.
So the northern politicians were safe and happy. They lived like lords, harvesting political rents. Their political estate was the large benighted population of the north whose votes made them national heroes. All they bothered about was winning elections and cornering privileges for their family and their friends.
The north is waking up. But it’s waking in fits and starts.
While it was asleep, corrupt politicians treated education as western adulteration of cherished conservative culture. The north lacked schools and teachers, and lacked hospitals and doctors and nurses. But their leaders couldn’t be bothered. The welfare of the poor was an abstract concept mouthed in campaign speeches.
Young doctors went for national youth service in the north and came back with tales of horror. Children and women died needlessly. Labour got obstructed and prolonged and the nearest hospital with a doctor was hundreds of kilometers away. Youth corps doctors were forced to do caesarean sections. We screamed when we shared the stories amongst ourselves those days.
The governors preferred playing emotional religious politics to building productive human capacity. So while some other parts of the country focused on education, some governors made sharia a project and built a large population of illiterate Almajiris.
And I think the north was pushed into deeper somnolence by tranquilizers like quota system and federal character. You can disagree with me. But I know competition would have awakened the north much earlier.
The north is rising. But it is still groggy.
The traditional institutions and the politicians underestimated the long term consequences of their fixation on electoral contests. Political power brought roads and more local government areas. The Federal Government built a refinery and sited federal institutions in some northern cities. But there was almost no attempt to educate the poor. Children roamed. Schools weren’t properly staffed. The three tiers of government left the smaller towns and rural areas in abject poverty and utter hopelessness. The private sector was absent. There was literally no man power for anything meaningful.
The politicians and retired soldiers cornered positions and oil wells. They rode in their big cars and flew in jets. They built big houses and sent their children to foreign lands for education. They let the ignorant poor to worship them and let them flourish in their ignorance. It all seemed peaceful at least. The rich in Kaduna , Kano and Abuja, played their polo. The poor children in Gamboru couldn’t get vaccines. They had to rely on Bill Gates and foreign charity to get, when they got. Poverty and disease and desertification battered and bruised them. The poor , illiterate and hopeless, in the slums of the big towns, in small towns and in the bushes in the hamlets found solace in religion. Radical preachers sneaked in and taught them comforting extremism.
The chickens are coming home to roost.
Banditry has taken over the parts of the north not ravaged by Boko Haram. Zamfara had once toyed with religious extremism. That former center of religious activism is now the devil’s workshop. Evil became so rife the former governor was ready to negotiate with demons who massacred and burnt whole villages. Children who didn’t go to school, who spent their entire lives in the wild, dragging cattle from Timbuktu to Calabar, had become possessed. They have forsaken religion and embraced the devil. And Zamfara is now thinking a mass literacy programme.
Kaduna, the center of the north has not been spared. Ethnic fault lines have been sharpened by frustration and hopelessness. Politicians had driven wedges between the poor to feather their political nests. Millions of unemployed youths are now finding guns and finding devilish impatience. Violence has mushroomed. And Kaduna is fast acquiring the character of Lebanon.
Our law enforcement agents are working hard. But they are overwhelmed. Law enforcement was designed to check and correct an exceptional few. And not to contain an epidemic of madness. From Benue to Taraba, from Katsina to Zamfara, it’s been violence after violence.
The north is waking up. I believe. But it has to find mental clarity, quickly. The north must institute a comprehensive population control measure. The north has to lock the tap. Mops wont do. The north lacks the resources to care for the children that it is currently producing on an industrial scale. It can’t abolish child malnutrition , Almajiri culture, high infant and maternal mortality until it puts a leash on its birthrate. Until the north checks its population growth rate it cannot check the wild fire of poverty that is ravaging its communities.
The north must wake up now.
Boko haram and rampant banditry have stabbed the north into wakefulness. But the north is waking up only in bits. The north is still sleepwalking.
The north left the tap running for too long. It is now flooded with problems that teeming illiteracy and joblessness create. The north must turn off the running tap first. The north must institute immediate population control. Yes, it will have to curb Almajiri by democratizing education. But it must shut the tap first. Without an effective and immediate population control policy , the north and the country is doomed.
It’s unfortunate it had to get to this. It’s unfortunate it had to take banditry for the north to think mass literacy and abolition of almajiri culture. Yobe has no existing factory. A bulk of the population of the Northeast lives in IDP camps. The future looks bleak . And there is no sense of urgency yet.
Northern billionaires must think industrialization of the north. It must be intentional. The potentials abound. There is a strong youthful population. They can’t wait for Bill Gates and Jimmy Carter.
The north must wake up now. It must not murder sleep again. |
Christianity Etc › Re: N/A for now............... .......... For now for now for now by budaatum: 4:34pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
Shepherd00: Altho, Buda says it does not believe in You, hence does not worship you, still have mercy on it and lead it to your Truth in your Words Which it does not believe it is. Amen Shepherd, except you lie, again, or just refuse to acknowledge what you read! Was the following not in response to Shepherd? budaatum: To worship God is do my will, to love your neighbour and to do unto others as you will have them do unto you, to forgive them their trespasses so that your trespasses can be forgiven, to feed the poor and to be “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the face of the earth.” I specifically said that anyone who understands this will even beg God to permit them to worship God! |
Christianity Etc › Re: N/A for now............... .......... For now for now for now by budaatum: 4:26pm On Aug 20, 2019 |
jcross19: if you support the killings in the old testament meaning the love Christ is not in you! even the coming of Christ have no meaning to you! and Bible says you are like your father the liar and killer! I 100% agree. Bad trees cannot bear good fruits. |