Foreign Affairs › Re: Trump: I Am The Chosen One! by budaatum: 1:42am On Aug 22, 2019 |
todaysecho: Earlier Wednesday, Trump retweeted a right-wing pundit’s flattering, messiah-flavored comments about the president’s support in Israel.
“The Jewish people in Israel love him like he’s the King of Israel. They love him like he is the second coming of God,” said the supporter, Wayne Allyn Root. For some, he who steals land for them is god  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Gospel According To Ṣallā Allāhu ʿalayhi Wa-ʿala Āli-hi Wa-sallam by budaatum(op): 1:38am On Aug 22, 2019 |
|
Politics › Re: I Respectfully Disagree With Dr. Ben Naanen On UNEP's Water Recommendations by budaatum: 1:36am On Aug 22, 2019 |
|
Family › Re: Do You Think My Mum Was Jazzed? by budaatum: 1:30am On Aug 22, 2019 |
Enchantaurl: Your comments and views are encouraged. So jazzed you gave her 60k! I feel you. Be strong. You will one day tell us how you learnt from it, and grew. |
Christianity Etc › Re: To the atheist, what do you think? by budaatum: 1:23am On Aug 22, 2019 |
johnydon22: Would he be right then to assume the universe began to exist?
Lol. This doesn't say anything, this is like saying, by cup i mean anything that is a cup.
How do you recognize something that can't emerge by chance?
What are the qualities observed that connote design? Oho! You see? Cups. |
|
Travel › Re: Russians Eating Nigerian Jollof Rice For The First Time by budaatum: 1:07am On Aug 22, 2019 |
afrorossiyatv: One girl literary cried after eating the jollof rice but she asked me not to include the video cos she'd be embarrassed lol Pepper cry? Haba!! |
Travel › Re: Russians Eating Nigerian Jollof Rice For The First Time by budaatum: 1:06am On Aug 22, 2019 |
Marineghost: Pepper too much for jollof rice
Op are you from the west? I thought too but no one faces went red, they were really enjoying it. Some of them ate 3 spoonfuls! afrorossiyatv You sabi cook jor! What you studying in P'Bourg? |
Travel › Re: Russians Eating Nigerian Jollof Rice For The First Time by budaatum: 12:00am On Aug 22, 2019 |
|
Travel › Re: Russians Eating Nigerian Jollof Rice For The First Time by budaatum: 11:59pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
FuckThaMod: You get money to waste.. Why not cook the rice and give the hungry ones here in naija. They will pray well for you  Instead of invest in his Dangoteness he should feed your lazy ass? Trust me. He has more sense than you! |
Christianity Etc › Re: N/A for now............... .......... For now for now for now by budaatum: 11:53pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
Shepherd00: Thank you for the insult. May God bless you. And you too Shepherd always and forever, blessed. The pleasure of insulting you is all mine |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Is The Word Of God Artificial? by budaatum: 11:47pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
GodWrites: Seems you do smoke weed before commenting on religious threads. No iota of sense made! Did you yourself with your very own hand not write, "Thou shalt not ignore"? In your head see, big brain! Way too smart to ignore. Tell truths God. You just disagree buda sense! |
Family › Re: My Wife Is A Cheat. I Need Advice by budaatum: 11:17pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
GodWrites: I got goosebumps after reading op's plight. My brother, how do you sleep at night knowing that another man might be dicking your wife?
How can your business flourish when you are carrying an issue that is so draining and depressing?
Take a look at your kids, I'm sure they don't resemble you in any way. Am I wrong?
If you wish to die old, you need to take a step that pains. A step that requires enormous strength. Please, DIVORCE that hoe before she end you.
If your wife can't respect you, the kids won't. It's obvious you have failed as a husband, do you want to fail as a father too? Yes, you failed as a husband cause those signs came earlier on, you neglected them because of what the society will think.
Divorce her, then think of buffing your finance. Don't wait till finance is okay before you take that step. It is a trap!
I hope you act like a man for once in your life. When I read the above I thought, "Aba! God! Op took you wife," then I went and read the op. Op! God hasn't kicked you hard enough! I want to jump in my phone and kick your ass or you will continue ignoring! Your wife is leaving you to baby sit while she is doing ashewo and you are complaining you ignored so much? I strongly advise you take the advice given you above or you will die! I found God and got 3 like for you! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Is The Word Of God Artificial? by budaatum: 6:51pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
geoworldedu: Are these your straightforward answers to my straightforward question? No! They are questions to see how it is that you understand what it is that you ask in your insightful questions which I admired immensely. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Is The Word Of God Artificial? by budaatum: 5:35pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
geoworldedu: The bible(Word of God) The Koran(Word of God) The Vedas(Word of God) etc. are all written down by human beings. The question is, why can't the Word of God grow out of the ground by itself or we hear it all at once? Why is the word of God artificial instead of being natural? If you think of it, of what benefit to God would words be? Are words for God's benefit or for the benefit of we humans? What purpose would you say those Words you mentioned serve? |
Politics › Re: So When Will Hausa Produce A President In Nigeria? by budaatum: 5:19pm On Aug 21, 2019*. Modified: 11:18pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
oyatz: After 200 years of the Fulani Jihad, the result is that it's very difficult to differentiate between the Fulanis and their host communities. I am suggesting to you that if one is sitting down south, you might be correct that "it's very difficult to differentiate between the Fulanis and their host communities", but that the Fulanis and the Hausas do not have this "difficult" themselves and know which is which. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Is The Word Of God Artificial? by budaatum: 5:10pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
geoworldedu: I don't seem to understand your argument at all. Can you summarise and simplify what you mean? geoworldedu: The topic is very straightforward, your explanation is very gloomy and unclear. How can what you do not understand and which is unclear to you be gloomy? Tell me what you do understand. Ask specific questions too. Then I might help you understand and only then can you know if it is gloomy or not. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 5:04pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
Ihedinobi3: I'm not entirely convinced that you do.
Like I said, I used axioms as an illustration because I expected that you would understand them without my meaning to explain them. An axiom cannot be proven, because an axiom is its own proof. That is, it is not that you cannot make any attempt at all at demonstrating that an axiom is true, but that you can only do so with circular arguments. That was implied in what I said. For this reason, it is always hard to prove an axiom to sophisticated intellects. If there were no proof for axioms Ihe, can one not just make one up? Is that how axioms work. Is it not a fact that they are so evidently true that they usually need not be proven? Hard, is not the same as impossible, ihe. Ihedinobi3: A little child might be surprised that b + a = a + b when you show them how a on one side is the same as a on the other, etc, but a growing child with more information would see it immediately and be promptly bored by any explanations of what is immediately obvious. But this also works against such a child because increase in information naturally makes us more arrogant, so when you state a new axiom that this new child has never seen, it is harder to explain it to them than it would have been to explain the first one. Is this not like saying, "let us not teach them least they know too much"? And is this not the same as enslaving them so that we are Lord over them? Why not teach them to question? Is that not how they will learn? Or is it that we ourselves have no confidence in our own teaching that we dare not be questioned on it!? Ihedinobi3: This is also a demonstration of what the Lord Jesus taught about receiving the Kingdom of God as a child. The only attitude in which anyone can become a believer is one of humility, that is, a willingness to be taught. Otherwise, it is impossible to get the Truth through to such a person. The only reason a teacher would require humility from their students is because the teacher is crap! If the teacher knew their subject the student either sits and learns or leaves the class. What Jesus taught was that those who would learn should be humble. As in, if I myself would learn, I myself should humble myself. He never said "make people humble so you can teach them", which is what you are proposing here! Ihedinobi3: So, it is not that there is no evidence for what one believes, but that the thing that one is called to believe is its own evidence. Well, this I cannot argue. People after all have different understanding of words. Me, though, I only believe things I do not know, and would rather say "I do not know" than "I believe", which implies that I don't exactly know but have a desire to assume it to be true instead of seeking to know for sure. When I know though, which is often after extensive seeking, I do not believe because I know. But note, that's me. Ihedinobi3: Another demonstration would be this: if you hung out with an OB-GYN friend and asked what they did today, they might tell you that they examined a pregnant woman. If you asked them how they knew that it was a pregnant woman that they examined, they'd probably say that it's because she was a woman and pregnant. The fact is that if they had a female human with all the biological paraphernalia of the gender on their table, they couldn't give more evidence than the human herself as proof for why they believe it is a woman that they are examining. The thing is proof of itself. I'm certain an OB-GYN can provide a lot more evidence than you claim here, especially in the world of gender reassignment we find ourselves in which men are getting pregnant. I shan't argue that there aren't some sloppy incompetent OB-GYN out there though. Ihedinobi3: That is what axioms are about. They are self-evident truths. As such, for example, a pregnant man is an impossibility. It would be an absurdity to assume such a thing as an axiom. This is just like assuming that a God cannot exist or is not necessary for the Universe to exist. Such an axiom would make no sense. The same reasoning applies to every belief system. The fact that a thing makes no sense to oneself does not mean it is senseless. We after all know of "pregnant men" today, and the supposed counter axiom that God does exist is refuted by many here. Or is one to assume they themselves do not exist despite their loudness on here? Axioms only make sense when they are backed up by evidence or we'd make up our own crap, call it an axiom and insist it be accepted as some "truth" when in truth, it just might be the crap it actually is! Ihedinobi3: So, again, I would say that "belief" is not the antithesis of evidence or of certain knowledge. What we know for certain is what we believe to be perfectly true, without any doubts whatsoever. One's belief about a given thing may be weak or strong, but it is not by virtue of being a belief independent of evidence. I posted you to my conversations on this topic and will not go there again except to say, for me, I do not believe rain is falling on my head when I am wet and cold from the rain that falls on my head. Since I have evidence of the rain in my wetness and coldness, I say "it is most definitely raining", and I say so because I know. But as I said, that's just me. Ihedinobi3: Moving on from that, your rejection of any authority outside of you is, of course, why I don't accept you as a fellow believer. Believers know that, first, we aren't good enough for God on our own, so we need the Lord Jesus, and, second, we desperately need each other to grow spiritually. It isn't a question of obeying each other. It is one of submitting to each other. That was the foot-washing lesson that the Lord taught us who follow Him. We have to be willing to accept each other's help, and also to help each other grow and mature and bear fruit too. Why, tell, do you accuse me of rejecting any authority outside myself Ihe, when the truth is that I quote Scripture as the authority for my statements? Do you check any of the links I post or do you treat them with contempt because they come from buda? I am not a fellow believer, and you rightly reject me on such grounds. But surely, if by believer, you mean a follower of the teachings of Christ, why do you reject your neighbour buda, Ihe, why do you reject your enemy buda, even? Or is it that we speak the words, believe them even, but doers of those words we are not? No God ever told me we are no good, Ihe, and even if I am to believe I myself are no good, it surely is not for me to go about thinking my neighbour is no good! I should be minding the forest in my own eyes and working on my own perfection instead of focusing on the speck in my neighbours or even my enemies eye! Surely, if I "believe" in submitting to each other, I should submit first instead of insisting as you do that you submit to me? Please know that I do not require your submission. I am buda, and not the Lord God Almighty, the only One one need submit to. Ihedinobi3: Finally, you make a lot of absolute statements here that I see no reason to consider even remotely true. Possibly the worst of them is that God did not say that we must not do such and such to the Bible. How do you know that? Are you God perhaps? Or do you have a direct line to Him so that you alone are privy to what He says about things? I provide evidence for my statements Ihe, or do you also see no reason to consider them? Please show where God said "love your Bible", as opposed to "love your neighbour and your enemy buda too". In fact, Ihe, does the Scripture you claim to hold in such high esteem not say you should give the shirt off your back to your enemy buda? Yes, Ihe, I do have a direct line to God. It is called the Comforter, that which my Lord and Messiah Jesus sent me when he returned to the right hand of the Lord God Almighty. Surely, you too ought to have such a direct line. But if you lack a direct line, ask God who gives generously to all who ask, without finding fault, and it will be given to you too. Ihedinobi3: Another bad one is that our error is in thinking that we alone have found and others must learn from us. Even if we thought so, who said that it's an error? You? Should we be worshiping you now? Or should we take what you said to mean that we cannot assume that what you said is not true and therefore we must not think that you have found too and listen to you? How does that work exactly? Please know that I see you as one who has the ability to separate the wheat from the chaff and discern the spirit in which I speak, but in this above you have competely turned what I say on its head and read into it what I say not. If I think I alone have a direct line to God, Ihe, then I am a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal, or more appropriately, an arrogant fuq, and to be honest, you would be able to tell by my use of words like "submit to buda", for that is what I would require from those I presume to be superior to. Ihedinobi3: I get that you have no intention to yield to the Gospel, given your many years of rebellion against it. And that's your business, but I can't reconcile that lack with your interest in the Lord Jesus. You make me wonder if you actually mean "submit to Ihe". Is it not written that God alone shall one submit to and worship? Even when I was an atheist, I had no reason to rebel against the Word. You may check the validity of this by following the link in my signature to a post of mine that dates all the way back to 2007. The Word is God, Ihe. One must see the Spirit in it though or one might believe it but not be a doer of the Word. As to reconciling my interest in Jesus, that need not be of concern to you for surely, in as much as I love you, the Lord God Almighty who alone sees the content of the heart is pleased. Please know that I jumped into this thread to accuse OkCornel of dragging you into an argument and now see myself as a hypocrite. The Peace of the Lord be with you. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 2:12pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
Michellekabod2: hmm....I fear for you oh buda.are you sure it ain't "testimonies" like this that will be used to oust you out of NL come 2020? I advice you,Lord Reed and Jnr agree on what qualifies for testimonies/miracles now I can assure you Michelle that come the day the will of my Lord will be done. You, must fear not! |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 2:09pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
Ihedinobi3: If you teach math, I think you'll understand then, if I use the concept of axioms.
You cannot even begin to understand anything about a mathematical system, if you do not first accept certain axioms upon which to base your mathematical reasoning.
But axioms cannot be proven. They are fundamental assumptions that are either right or just not right. In the end, you have to simply decide whether it makes sense to believe or accept a set of axioms or not. But you must make that choice to even have a shot at getting started on a mathematical journey.
This is what makes a believer a believer. We have to decide first and foremost whether we are willing to base everything on Jesus Christ, God become Man to die on the Cross for our sins, or not. We have to decide if we trust Him enough to believe whatever He says. Then we have to make the decision to diligently learn everything that He has to say and teach and studiously and painstakingly apply it in every point to our lives.
This is not something that you can say that you can study and scrutinize and prove. Either it makes sense to us intuitively to believe in the Lord Jesus or it does not. As it is, all of Creation around us and our own consciences are all we need to figure out whether such Faith is sensible or not. If we choose not to believe in the Lord Jesus, we will end up believing something else entirely. But we will choose in one direction or another. No one can avoid that.
On the basis of what we choose to believe fundamentally, that is, the axioms of life that we choose to adopt, we start to make sense of life. Of course, life will produce a feedback to tell you whether your axioms were sensible or not. If they were, you will find encouragement and confirmation in your choice to believe, and you will go from "tentative" to "sure" in time. This really is what we call spiritual growth in Christianity. At spiritual maturity, the believer is quite certain and convinced of the Truth of what he believes. He is no longer easy to persuade in any other direction. This does not mean that he cannot fall away anymore. He can, if he stops working forward. There is no standing still in the spiritual business of life. Either you are growing more resolute and convinced of one way of life or you are growing more resolute and convinced of another.
The main difference between the Christian and others is that life's feedback tends to agree with everything that the Bible teaches. It doesn't for other belief systems including atheism. But, of course, each of us has the godlike ability to believe whatever we want, which comes packaged with the ability to persuade ourselves to ignore whatever we prefer to ignore and see whatever we want to see. Of course, it's not so strong as to turn reality on its head, so anybody can still change whenever they want. That is, after all, why Christians can throw their Faith away, and unbelievers can become Christians too.
In the end, there is nothing special about me. I have been a Christian since childhood, yes, but I only began to learn what Christianity was about less than two years ago in October 2017. October last year, I began to post on this forum with this account. Not only have I continued to grow through that time, but I have also been offering everyone who gives me half a chance an opportunity to learn where I learned. I have been willing to teach others what I know, and to lead them to where I myself was taught. I have not denied it to anybody whom I thought might be willing to listen, certainly not you.
But I have never graduated from being a believer. I have never met or even seen the Lord Jesus. I have never seen angels or been to the Third Heaven. I have never met any of the saints that wrote the Scriptures or were written of in the Bible. I take everything in it on Faith, one, because it all makes sense, and, two, because it all always works out just as it says that it will.
That is what I call everyone to do: give the Bible an honest shot, and see where it takes you, before assuming the position of judge over it. I do perfectly understand you Ihe. Axioms are indeed necessary for those in preschool or those in class one, but an understanding of them apply in class 2 and thereon which is why we must and do show how they are true. The problem I encounter is in teaching axioms to students in the more advanced class. One might postulate that a+b, for instance, equals b+a, but eventually, we do and must show our students how and why we say so, otherwise, we merely create believers, and not the doers we hope to create. One cannot after all create Light by bread alone, and teaching axioms to the more advanced student is like not first examining to find out what they already know. I myself find this when I'm asked if I have accepted Christ into my life by preachers who have not even read their Bible from the beginning to the end. It is also why I am not one of your students, as you rightly point out. Why, pray tell, would you require my obedience to you when it is written that the Kingdom of God can be in me too? Can you not see how ridiculous I would sound if I were to require such obedience from you? Would it not sound very much like I were asking you to bow down and worship me? "Oh what arrogance my dear buda", would be the [url= https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+4%3A10&version=KJV]appropriate retort[/url] if I were you. Please know that my journey has been different to yours which is why I likely take the stance I take. I was an atheist from birth and was rationally educated to know that proof and evidence is key with belief frowned upon without it. The axiom in rational education is "all things are created by words", which is why a scholarly educatiin is a prequisite and all other things follow on from there. For however one looks at things, in the beginning surely was the Word, which is indeed God, without which nothing was made. Rational education however also taught me the folly of living by bread alone, which is seen in your extensive seeking for the Knowledge of God that you show here. For it is obvious that it includes a lot more that proceedeth out of the Mouth of God than the Bible, which is bread alone. Or can you honestly claim you only read the Bible? Thankfully, God who created me the way I am knows what I am and never asked me to have faith or intuitively accept that which I have no evidence for. Its like I was given an exemption from preschool and was advanced to the higher classes, for as is written, those who seek will surely find. Our error, however, is in thinking that we alone have found, and that all others must therefore sit at our own feet and learn. Such as these fail to understand that they who must be first must needs be last for out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast strength been ordained. I mean, look at you, all but two years old! No! Look at me even, less than 9 months old, with strength to avenge both enemies and foes! Yet, as the Lord did [url= https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+6%3A27-36&version=NIV]say[/url], "Love, buda! Or ye shall end up shirtless!" It is not over the Bible that we must not judge, considering the additions and corrections and ommision, but over that which was written by the very breath of God. For the Lord never said "do or do not unto the Bible". What he rightly said was "Do unto these who thou see", or one shall incur a huge dental bill which is the wages or " Lord Lord". I guess its difficult to enter back into the womb and be reborn. Yet, the Grace of the Lord God Almighty ministers to us all and those with ears will see. |
Culture › Re: Yoruba Vs Igbo Feud!- What Is The Solution? by budaatum: 12:43pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 12:36pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
OkCornel: Did you read my first post on this thread?
Do you also agree the Gospel of Matthew to John is a testimony of the Apostles accounts with Jesus? No, Cornel, I had not read your account of Akiane, though, as you have seen in one of my posts, I did go and research her all the same. Now that I have read your post though, I can't but be reminded of the angel of the Lord taking Swedenborg on a journey through Heaven and Hell. None of the Gospels were written by any of the Apostles of Jesus. None of them are even eyewitness accounts as shown by Luke who tells us clearly that his narrative is what he received from many before him and eyewitnesses and ministers, which is clearly, a second hand account. But that's besides the point. The Word of God it is to those who place God at the forefront of their reading despite the additions, corrections and ommisions, for the devil too [url= https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+4%3A1-11&version=NKJV]wears[/url] Prada. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 12:10pm On Aug 21, 2019 |
Ihedinobi3: There were. Not enough though to produce a "corrupted version," only enough to prevent a believer who is not diligent in the Truth from reaching spiritual maturity. If we are diligent, the same way that weird statements in something someone is saying to us or writing would stand out, the foreign elements would seem awkward in the context of the Bible.
For example, in John 7:53-8:11, something would not sit right with a story that sounds like that. At the end, the Lord Jesus does not condemn her? He forgave the man suffering from the palsy before healing him. He commanded the man he healed in John 5 to stop sinning or face worse consequences. In other words, even when He does not say that He does not condemn them, He does not even imply that He does not. When He forgives, it is because He saw faith. When He heals the man who was an invalid, it is because of the same. Why then is it said that He does not condemn here? In a way, it is because people want to see that He is not harsh on sin, but the Lord Jesus really is, as we see from Hebrews 13 and Revelation 2-3, at least.
Another example is the "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do" statement. That also attempts to make this Jesus a forgiving Jesus Who bears all sin with little demand on the sinner. In fact, not a single person is forgiven who does not ask for it. Although the Lord Jesus paid the price for all human sin, only those who ask for it receive forgiveness on the basis of that payment that He made.
These are some examples of additions in the Bible. Doctrinally, they conflict with the rest of the Bible, but even scholars who translate from the manuscripts can tell today with the technology we have where the text has been corrupted. So we don't need to continue to labor under such errors.
Finally, as I said before, there is less than 1% of the text that is corrupted like this. So the believer is quite fine even if he lacks such scholarship. If he is obedient enough to submit to a gifted and prepared pastor-teacher, then he will also grow spiritually and mature and bear fruit for which he will receive the three eternal crowns that all believers are promised if they finish the course well. I do not consider you a "believer" Ihe. You have done far too much work to merely believe, and seem to use the word in its traditional pastor teaching sense, which perhaps is why you and I conflict being a teacher myself, albeit of earthly maths. I just can't imagine the harm I'd do if instead of teaching to understand I tell my students to believe in Pythagoras. I see that as the problem of our society and nation in fact. Imagine how so much more powerful we could be if the tools to understand that you clearly have is what is taught instead of "belief". Would we not know to say "Let there be light", and light will be? The devil in me just makes me want to take my pen and delete that word and replace it with 'understand', and 'know'. After all, when one seeks, one may indeed believe, but once one has found, one must surely know and understand, as you clearly do. But indeed, there is a need. For how does one teach understanding of what requires long years of personal study and experience least one first believe it then seek understanding, which is what you have done? Yet will I, as unworthy as I am, ask one as you to consider that if the taught could learn to do that which makes you you, o how much more understanding and knowing and power there might be. I, buda, pray. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 11:34am On Aug 21, 2019 |
OkCornel: I guess the testimonies of many others should be counted as lies... No! It is not for you to count! Counters do not love! They just count trees in the eyes of others. OkCornel: I also guess I must have committed a grevious error in believing "ask and ye shall receive, seek and ye shall find" No! And I say that despite my abhorrence of "believing" which I recently stated here! First, it matters not whether you believe the testimonies of others or not, for they, unless their intent is to sheepiefy you, do not testify for your believing. And how, pray tell, is their testimony your own " find"? OkCornel: Absolutely no worries at all... As you can clearly see, I do worry, a lot. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheist Is A Depressing Religion. Discuss by budaatum: 11:24am On Aug 21, 2019 |
LordReed: Thou art blest my dear buda! Thou hast filled my soul with more than bread! You, my Lord, is, my Lord. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 11:17am On Aug 21, 2019 |
OkCornel: More testimonies from nairalanders; Funny that these testimonies carry the weight of evidence for you. Are they not just the subjective experiences of the individuals? And why should Christ, who only currently exists in Spirit, look like any of the pictures of shown? Is that in itself not evidence of actually not having an encounter with Christ at all? Sounds like image making to me. The abandoning of the Spirit for the flesh. Is it not [url= https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+25%3A40&version=KJVwritten]written[/url] that inasmuch as ye have done to those whom thou seest.........
|
Christianity Etc › Re: A Question For The Theists by budaatum: 11:02am On Aug 21, 2019 |
I so want to jump in and respond to my Lord, but I shall wait Image123, for your response to him first since he did ask it of you. Know though, I chomp at the bit. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 10:56am On Aug 21, 2019 |
OkCornel: Am I?
Was asking questions there...not forcing my view point on him though.
See how the whole conversation played out eventually... Oh Cornel, you were preaching to him even with your question, while Ihe was having an argueconversation with op. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 10:53am On Aug 21, 2019 |
Ihedinobi3: Mark 16 ends at verse 8. The rest of the chapter (and it has different endings with some longer than others in different Bibles) is an addition to what was originally written. Hold on! You do know there were other additions, omissions, and edits in todays Bibles, right? Kind of makes believing suspect, won't you say? One might believe in a corrupted version! buda is derailing! As far as op is concerned, thou shalt not create graven images and bow down to worship them. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Jesus I Saw, Same As That Drawn By An Eight Year Old Who Also Saw Him-Photos by budaatum: 10:41am On Aug 21, 2019 |
OkCornel: Which one? The Bible with only 66 books? or the one with the Apocrypha...
Since the Bible was written and compiled, Has Jesus stopped showing Himself to people? Why does it seem you are the one arguing Cornel? |
Christianity Etc › Re: N/A for now............... .......... For now for now for now by budaatum: 10:24am On Aug 21, 2019 |
jcross19: you are baby !!!!!! you have myopic and shallow sense of reason and your reason faculty is very poor! for comparing Jesus to Elisha ! Elisha is a definition of weakness that did not hesitated to exercised his power over the poor kids compare to Jesus that was beaten even pleaded on their behalves , instructed his followers to do the same if not Peter would have not been nailed on the cross? ! the love of Christ is not in you! Elisha is a prophet without holy spirit, 1corinthian 13:6-13 ! you are just nothing without love in you! Your God is the sort of God that makes one say, "Rabbi, where are you staying?" |
Christianity Etc › Re: N/A for now............... .......... For now for now for now by budaatum: 10:19am On Aug 21, 2019 |
Shepherd00: I harangued you? Budaatum, if there's anything I've tried to do when I discuss is to focus on the Op. You may try putting lipstick on a swine to make it look better but those with eyes will see that it grunts. By our fruits are we known Shepherd, and not by the spin we try to put on our fruits. Please know that I buda insult you! |