₦airaland Forum

vaxx:
i think he is working with some junk of philosophy that he might not properly understand. Well, i might be wrong too. But to be fair, i want to give him the benefit of the doubt. He may not even used any mathematical model. All i need is explanation, even if not compelling. I will take it as knowledge that can be modify.

Trust me. You are doing a wonderful job, as usual!

Did Jesus Live 100 B.C.? is a worthy book on the subject.

No, I don't believe women should be productive. I do know they are productive though. Some really work hard at it too.

vaxx:
Provide a mathematical and physical formula that back up this assertion and justify it with satisfiable explanation.

Mathematical and statistical? Won't that be complicated? Remember our table discussion?

Just let him hit his head against a wall and come and tell me if the wall or his head or the ache he feels in it does not exist!

Ihedinobi3:
I think it would be best if you state clearly what your position is. At the moment, my inference from everything I have read you say is wrong by the above. I don't want to wrongly attribute arguments to you. So, please, for the sake of clarity, describe clearly to me what you believe to be the case in this matter.

And a happy new year to you, budaatum.

Happy New Year to you too, MuttleyLaff. Thank you for your message. I obviously disagree with some of what you said but I understand the sentiment.

My position is that there are no gods and no hell. However, if one sins, as in, do the wrong thing, one will reap ones just reward, the wages of sin. One reaps what one sows, is a universal rule.

Happy New Year to you too.

I doubt he'll be impeached. Even if they wish to, the numbers just aren't there, and if they try and use the process to keep him busy, it'll just blow up in their faces and give him a second term.

I think Trump is his own enemy. If he's not cautious he just end up impeaching himself.

If they remove this woman, they better ensure her next job is like a triple promotion. It would be a travesty if diligent hard work is punished, and if it happens to her, it can happen to you too.

I wonder if you think atheists have been swearing on the bible all this time?

BraniacX:
My dear, the true details, the true gritty details involved in slavery is very painful reading for any conscious black man and that's why it is never depicted in Hollywood where only a whitewashed version is screened! The true details can drive on into rampage! White people historcally are worse than evil and have carried out massive genocide and extinction programs against many aboriginal humans around the world! As bad as we got it we were still lucky! They were and in the form of their conservatives still are truly evil people

I'm very aware of the details, after all, there's lot's of books by those who lived through it, but I'm sure however I feel about it can't compare to what mama heard from granny and told an African American. The shoe, as they say, is that far away from my foot. That's the more reason why I should be sensitive to the situation of those still living it one way or the other though, and the more reason my ignorance should be treated as what it is, a thing to be educated out of me and not just insulted.

I understand schwarzkopf. Just there's better ways to handle me than with insults, please consider.

Ranchhoddas:
There's no way in hell that's Billy.

Yeah, I agree. I never conversed with billy much, but I am sure he knew not to do silly with buda - least he never did, while hell seems to do silly with every post!

kkins25:
oh now you're insulting billyonaire..

Yeah, I guess it would be an insult! This hell is just making me sin and have to apologise all the time. Except to him, lol.

Sorry billyonaire. I didn't mean to!

nairaman66:
Please tell me what is the difference? On both occasions he has failed in all entirety in terms of governance!

Many people do not agree he failed as HoS in the 80s. The civilian rule era that preceeded his take over was so incompetent and corrupt that people danced in the street when he did. And the subsequent few months that followed were transformational, with Nigerians learning to queue at busstops and not throwing rubbish on the streets. We thought a messiah had finally landed, and then Babangida struck and the rest is history. It was the truncation of his time that made many eventually give him a second chance, especially seeing how Jonathan's time was closely mirroring Shagari's.

But, I guess all the above shows the scale I'm measuring by, and no one with a "just let us chop" attitude would agree that Buhari has been good. No, you don't chop under Buhari! But then, he's always been in charge only after everything has been chopped finish and we need saving from not making hay when the sun shined. I would love to see what he does in the time of plenty.

MuttleyLaff:
Atheism is a religion but I don't believe in it

Religion takes different shape and form, has different passions, interest, rituals etcetera.
For some, sports, like football or hockey is a religion.
For others some, fashion too is a religion.

I see you've been peddling this idea for a while. I wonder where you place the ubiquitous worship of money.

HellVictorinho:
I am not Billy!!!!!!!

I didn't think you could possibly be billy. Thanks for confirming you're not.

HellVictorinho:
First,I shouldn't be stupidly compared with VAXX.

Trust me. It was a huge error on my part, and one for which I will be begging vaxx for forgiveness all year!

Are you really the old billynaire?

MuttleyLaff:
That is billyonaire for you ...

Seriously? Was billy this uncivilised? Guess I never knew him, but this hell incarnation, if billy, would explain why he needs to keep dying and resurrecting under new guises. One would expect him to have learnt manners by now though.

XxSabrinaxX:
The human ass wasn't intended to be screwed and it causes a ton of issues.

This is just my 2 cents. Hope i didn't hurt anyone's feelings.

Ass screwing is not the same as homosexuality. Heterosexuals too screw asses!

Consider halving that 2 cents!

vaxx:
So if you say previous vaxx, you may need to explain it.

How you communicate, your method of communicating, has changed. But I now agree that its an insult to compare you with hell and sincerely apologise though I did not intend it as an insult, just an observation.

HellVictorinho:
What!!!!!
Don't you know how to read?
I used the word 'could'- suggesting mere probability-and not the word 'will'-suggesting absolute certainty (100% probability).
It is the possibility of Buhari winning I am certain about and not the probability!!!!!

And like I said, pigs could fly. And unless you are jumping from could to will, or can, I guess they are just going to go on grunting like they always have.

So what exactly is you point? Or do I need to wait until you learn to have regard for others and communicate effectively, hell?

HellVictorinho:
The Universe is a 'Form of Existence' and not Existence itself which is a possibility that is actualized by the Existential Constant.
This Constant acts like an ever-existing drive that keeps the ever-occurring activity which is the 'Forming of Existence' in Actuality.
Here,Possibilities get actualized in different forms by occurring in a manner that is determined by their functional consequences.
These occurrences take place at ANYTIME.
The 'Settings',which determine how 'The Possibility of Existence' functions consequently are responsible for the state of The Plane on which 'The Forming of Existence' takes place.
The Plane is un-dimensional so there is nothing like 'Everything',there has never been and there will never be.
Consciousness is just a functional consequence.
And there has never been 'Nothing'
The Existential Constant maintains the Possibility of Existence and it can't be determined by time.
It is the Ever-existing 'Drive' that doesn't require any 'Form'.
It is that which makes In-Existence ever-impossible.
There has never been a 'period' when 'nothing' was happening and there will never be.

The Constant of Existentiality is a phenomenon that cannot be discovered due to its 'Ever-Existing Function'
It can only be deduced.
The manner in which 'The Forms of Existence' are expressed also depends on the functional consequences of their possibilities.
In conclusion,'The Settings' are determined by the functional consequences of 'The Possibility of The Existential Constant'.

Hmm, ok. I guess I just don't have the "critical thinking" and "highly intellectual reasoning" abilities you speak of.

Vaxx, do you know he reminds me of a previous you, lol, with apologies.

HellVictorinho:
Actually,there are many points in the post.
But the points require critical thinking and highly intellectual reasoning to be fully understood.

He did not say there were no points. It's "difficult to understand" because you just typed without even bothering to define your terms! Or do you expect us to look up the meaning of "Existential Constant",
"ever-existing drive", "ever-occurring activity", and "'Forming of Existence' in Actuality" in a dictionary?

At this rate, you are going to end up talking to yourself, HellVictorinho!

HellVictorinho:
When a possibility is stated,there must be a chance that it could happen.
Existential possibilities are different from Eventful possibilities.
And I know how gays behave.
What if I tell you that cows are mammals and Mr Mohammed Buhari could win the 2019 presidential elections if he is allowed to continue as a candidate of his political party?
Would that require evidence?
Unless you were born in 1345 or somewhere in Jupiter,I would say it is unnecessary.
Certain things are certain for certain reasons..

Certain that "Mohammed Buhari could win the 2019 presidential elections if he is allowed to continue as a candidate of his political party" ?

Yes, a possibility. But hopefully you see the error when you jump from that to "Mohammed Buhari will win the 2019 presidential elections if he is allowed to continue as a candidate of his political party".

If you know that, just post me winning number or whatever let me knack baba jebu and comot for here!

HellVictorinho:
When a possibility is stated,there must be a chance that it could happen.

Define possibility! Hopefully you don't mean like a possibility for gods!

Oh, and I'm sure you know which language I'm typing in!

One against:
Overview: We identified 79 scholarly studies that met our criteria for adding to knowledge about the well-being of children with gay or lesbian parents. Of those studies, 75 concluded that children of gay or lesbian parents fare no worse than other children. While many of the sample sizes were small, and some studies lacked a control group, researchers regard such studies as providing the best available knowledge about child adjustment, and do not view large, representative samples as essential. We identified four studies concluding that children of gay or lesbian parents face added disadvantages. Since all four took their samples from children who endured family break-ups, a cohort known to face added risks, these studies have been criticized by many scholars as unreliable assessments of the well-being of LGB-headed households. Taken together, this research forms an overwhelming scholarly consensus, based on over three decades of peer-reviewed research, that having a gay or lesbian parent does not harm children.
What does the scholarly research say about the well-being of children with gay or lesbian parents?


And one for:
Ten narrative studies involving family histories of 262 children of gay fathers and lesbian mothers were evaluated statistically in response to Morrison's (2007) concerns about Cameron's (2006) research that had involved three narrative studies. Despite numerous attempts to bias the results in favour of the null hypothesis and allowing for up to 20 (of 63, 32%) coding errors, Cameron's (2006) hypothesis that gay and lesbian parents would be more likely to have gay, lesbian, bisexual or unsure (of sexual orientation) sons and daughters was confirmed. Percentages of children of gay and lesbian parents who adopted non-heterosexual identities ranged between 16% and 57%, with odds ratios of 1.7 to 12.1, depending on the mix of child and parent genders. Daughters of lesbian mothers were most likely (33% to 57%; odds ratios from 4.5 to 12.1) to report non-heterosexual identities. Data from ethnographic sources and from previous studies on gay and lesbian parenting were re-examined and found to support the hypothesis that social and parental influences may influence the expression of non-heterosexual identities and/or behaviour. Thus, evidence is presented from three different sources, contrary to most previous scientific opinion, even most previous scientific consensus, that suggests intergenerational transfer of sexual orientation can occur at statistically significant and substantial rates, especially for female parents or female children. In some analyses for sons, intergenerational transfer was not significant. Further research is needed with respect to pathways by which intergenerational transfer of sexual orientation may occur. The results confirm an evolving tendency among scholars to cite the possibility of some degree of intergenerational crossover of sexual orientation.
CHILDREN OF HOMOSEXUALS MORE APT TO BE HOMOSEXUALS? A REPLY TO MORRISON AND TO CAMERON BASED ON AN EXAMINATION OF MULTIPLE SOURCES OF DATA

From wiki
Scientific research consistently shows that gay and lesbian parents are as fit and capable as heterosexual parents, and their children are as psychologically healthy and well-adjusted as those reared by heterosexual parents. Major associations of mental health professionals in the U.S., Canada, and Australia have not identified credible empirical research that suggests otherwise.

And according to Queers!
A new study out of Italy shows children raised by same-sex couples are as psychologically well-adjusted—if not slightly more—than children raised by heterosexual couples.

It adds to the growing body of research disproving the notion that same-sex parenting is somehow inferior. It also comes as Italy grapples with the matter of same-sex marriage. The issue has become something of a political sore spot for the European country, which for a long time was one of the most prominent Western nations refusing to legalize even civil unions for gays and lesbians. The Italian parliament in May 2016 passed a law approving civil unions, but marriage equality remains elusive, in part because of the political clout of the Roman Catholic church, which has opposed such measures.
Science is debunking the lie that kids of same-sex parents are psychologically worse-off

As you can see, there are various diverse opinions on the subject, all of them very likely promoting their own bias, or rather, talking through their asses!

Psychologically too!

HellVictorinho:
Can't you read?
And,have you not heard of psychology?

As I said after reading what you wrote, twice, as MuttleyLaff would advise, do you know it is a possibility that you talk from you behind? I have no evidence, but a very strong possibility self.

HellVictorinho:
What I mentioned is a possibility.

So it's just a possibility. You have no evidence whatsoever to support your claim? And I bet you've never met a gay person either!

Do you know it's a possibility for gay people to have two heads fly to the moon and talk from your behind? I have no evidence for any of this, but its a possibility, no?

obailala:
Lol... new one to keep Nigerians busy throughout next week.

Obviously Buhari doesnt listen to anyone besides his inner cabal controlling him. But then again, why exactly was the recording cut short by Reno?.... Why cant the full recording be released to expose the full message?

Because the rest of the recording will dabaru Reno's narrative now. You no know?

HellVictorinho:
What I mentioned is a possibility.
That is,a change in the actual sexual orientation of a child adopted by gays.
The child getting affected by the practice of homosexual acts is a probability.
And this probability supersedes that of the child not getting affected.

Show me your reasons for making the above assertion, haba. After all, you cannot possibly be making this up now! Or are you?

Is homosexuality a communicable disease?

HellVictorinho:
They simply make it look completely normal to exhibit things like homosexual feelings,sexual desires,orientations.
They also cause the children they adopt to be exposed to things that might change their actual sexual orientation.

You get evidence for this, or is it just a belief you have?

Name me one gay person you have met please.

qleap2all:
It is now they are quoting bible!

After im carry eraser wipe out "thou shalt not steal" . But I'm not surprised. Armed robber rob tire, and all of a sudden "you will join me and my father in heaven. And on my right side sef. Just wait make I enter hell come back and you shall see". Lobatan, as they say.

Somebody please give me Bible. Me to want steal!