CyberG's Posts
Nairaland Forum › CyberG's Profile › CyberG's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 (of 125 pages)
igbo boy:Like I mentioned, it's okay to wear whatever toga you like but NOT every Igbo person or individual will agree with you and this you must accept without turning to insults. I like that you choose to respond without tribal insults. 1. Yes. It depends though on who you define as non old eastern region people because it is on record that other minority tribes in the old eastern regions actually fought against Biafra. I can furnish you with references and a lot are on this NL already. For example, when the biafran army retreated from Port Harcourt, they committed atrocities against the local population because they felt rejected and betrayed. 2. The outcome of this was is not elusive to me or to anyone. The point is you claimed that other peoples of Nigeria are not battle tested, as you will agree is a lie as biafra lost the war to the same people you claimed are not battle tested. Apparently if a side lost a fight against another, how can the person who lost still claim the opponent was not battle tested?? You see the logic? |
[quote author=One_Naira link=topic=833153.msg9852790#msg9852790 date=1325106635]You are just finding this out today? Open a thread and I mean any thread and just mention the word Igbo, watch as some Yoruba will bring Biafra, Lagos, Black scorpion, etc that thread in less than a day. I don't pay them mind anymore, I don't get why some Igbo still do.[/quote]My previous post to Nchara applies. In case you are not aware, a lot of Igbos do not necessarily share your viewpoints and that's okay but no need to think that they are after you or some tribal BS. See my first post here and see I was basically asking a question which brought about a debate. I only ask that you acquit yourself as a real man with intellectual capacity and respond without going down into the gutter to turn to insult, abuse and tribalism. |
Nchara:No problems and in fact commended it. Check comment on page 1, post #15, in case you missed it. The only question I asked about the post was phantom claims of "Genocide" which is was injected an angle to the debate. BTW, this has nothing to do with tribes and tribalism as per your other allusions. |
I doubt this story. However, if it does happen, we should just go on with it without looking back or saddling the ND for seven years to finance everyone. What is most important is there shall be no half measures, no grey lines AT ALL which might be difficult but MUST be done to avoid the kind of situation in current Nigeria. In that vein, everyone MUST return to their regions, state or village as applicable. Let everyone use their resources for their people and not expect or hope to use the resources of any other people. So for example, while the ND must keep their oil resources, the business environment of the North and West can also not be shared. The human resources of the East cannot be exploited by another region and these provisions must be non-negotiable. The food in the Middle Belt may only be purchased and no other peoples can go and claim their land. Every business deal among the regions shall be strictly business: you do something and get paid - nothing shall mean joint ownership of space, land, resource or permanent interests. This is only way to avoid war, conflicts and fights in the future countries - creating another Nigeria. |
igbo boy:I know you are a TRIBALIST but I have a question for you: when you were battle-tested, what people did you fight with? What was the result of your fight? I am curious and hope you can debate like a real man without resorting to tribal insults? |
topsy1971:You can order from Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Brothers-War-Biafra-Nigeria/dp/0395139341. Used copies sell for $5 while new copies sell for $166. You might also check on e-bay or Google for any other deals. However, if you live outside Nigeria and in places where there are lots of opportunities to access good libraries, you can borrow from the library. This book will put you in a very good position of knowledge to grasp the length and breadth from a more neutral position than some other books. Thereafter, you can expand your knowledge base as you read from other authors. One thing that is clear is most tribalistic people from the SE cannot debate this issue with any objectivity hence they will attack you and call you names. When you read the stories and they are well cross referenced from several sources, you will know exactly the whats, whys, how, when, etc! The tribalists don't like you to know these things as they would rather we take their one-sided stories told by people who only saw what happened to and around them than people who traveled entirely across Nigeria and outside investigating, researching and reporting facts of the case. If anyone wants to know more of recorded accounts of this allegations of genocide, I will post recorded details made in later chapters. The fact is the killings were despicable BUT if you fight a man who has a gun to your head and has many of his friends ready to take you down, you best knock them all out in one blow otherwise, what kind of pity would you deserve when they take their revenge? |
Relax101:
|
Relax101:First, stay away from abuse and insulting words if you want to have a debate on facts not fiction or propaganda. In that spirit, I will let your personal abuses slide this time. My post may not erase propaganda and lies from your heart, but it will show other "neutral" people who seek genuine knowledge to at least have a different perspective to your one-way lies. Now I will address your points: 1. The video you added though shows sad depiction of the human conditions during the war. I will grant that much but it is silly to consider any event without its history. That incident and many others is a cascade effect of bad decisions taking by your leaders from before independence. For the sake of argument, let's say we discount pre-independence issues, Ojukwu studied history. He was a soldier, he knew about war and must have seen what World War II was like in terms of human suffering. There were well documented proofs of genocide of anyone not considered the "pure Aryan race", though Jews, Gypsies, Poles, etc got killed faster. The only difference between this case and the genocide you claim is this people did not go to fight Hitler. They did not abuse him or encroach on his land. They would in fact would have given him up more than to be "cleansed" and I could go on but what it the contrast in the case you mentioned, your leaders ACTIVELY promoted every action that led to hatred and killings. On NL today, you little lemmings still gloat over every other person and then you claim victim when they attack you? Now, see this video as just a TINY example of systematic, deliberate killings of people who were not even fighting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jdefO0Dxhc 2. You did not respond to the source of some of the most savage killings during the war being a cause of direct provocation of an army which was restrained to not unleash its fury! If armed robbers broke into your home and had everyone held hostage but they have decided only to take some money and leave everyone alive, what would you do? Get a stick and hit their boss or slap him while others are carrying heavy guns in your face? What kind of pity do you deserve for such stupidity when they totally unload every last piece of lead into you? Go back and read the beginning of that episode and relying on individual people's account may be true only from the person's experience and not the sum of the war! This is true as you know but since this helps to buttress a point that you wish to desperately shove down everyone's throat, you think we MUST just accept your own personal stories told by people who could be in only one place at a time? 3. It is shown on a video interview where Ojukwu accepted that some of the stories told were made to support Biafra to get the much needed attention and endorsement of the outside world at that time. That video is on here and can be searched. In fact, he preferred to have arms flown in rather than much needed food and medical aid and tasked the care givers of the war that in order to bring in food, they must also bring in weapons! Are you kidding me? So, in a fight, do you rely on someone else to bring you weapons as a condition to accept their offer of help to give food and medication? Only a little silly baby kid expects to be fed on his own terms after he rebels against his parents or guardians! See the following videos and your leaders knew of the existence of the Katyusha rocket launchers with which the Russians utterly destroyed Berlin on the return match. Although the suppliers of weapons to the Nigerian Army did not supply some of the more deadly mass killing weapons such as this one, what would have happened if they had acquired it? See this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-K7b8sAH1w&feature=related starting at 2:18 and 5:57 or so. What kind of crime beyond genocide should Berliners be claiming after several weapons like these fire for hours on end directly on human beings? 4. To end, do you know that most NL SE folks gloat today that they killed more numbers of soldiers on the Nigerian side than the Nigerians killed on their side? What sort of sentiment do you wish to stir up when you go on this useless mouth running for which the Northerners so despised the Ibos and a direct reason of why they went on the killing rampage of 1966 when Ironsi was adamant on promulgating his unification decree? Did you read that Ibos (visitors in northern Nigeria and Western Nigeria) sang derisively of their hosts because their leaders were all killed in a few hours while Ibo leaders saved their own? The Nigerians still being gracious in war allowing the ITO to inspect the conduct of war deserve no credit but you killed more soldiers is the propaganda you'd like to spread? Do you know that unlike when bullets were rationed in the SE, the Nigerians could exhaust their bullets caring less so far as they survived? In essence, they had to be more careful and were specifically instructed NOT to kill their brothers who surrendered or didn't you read that? I can go on and on. My challenge to you is to show that the killings were not a direct result of a silly decision by an Ibo who could not think beyond his nose of the immediate consequences to his fellow Ibos. Respond without insults and I will show you more documented proofs from other books. A single story does not represent and cannot represent the totality of the events spanning several thousands of square kilometers in area as the story tellers can only speak from their own experience! |
He still managed to look like a dummy, dull, dumdum foool in this picture. Even the sultan looks much much better and more presidential - look at the body language! 1. Jonathan is elated to shake hands with him 2. Jonathan fixed his attention on him. 3. Sultan puts on a serious business like attitude and face while Jonadunce is clowing. 4. While making a handshake with the so called loser, the Sultan refuses to make eye contact and looks away from Jona. 5. Sultan doesn't appear to care either way and not only looking away from Jona but also the camera! 6. Jona hangs his left hand at his side or back sheepishly and lazily while the sultan gets both hands up - one for a handshake and the other in a defensive to attack transition position! Oh well, he retired from a senior military position anyway and knows the president is a foool. On any day he will kill Jonasatan in a few punches anyway! |
Well, a lot of people are now on this thread and MOST of you only spoke from your tribalism infested minds because you ignored the crux of the point I made earlier about phantom allegations of genocide but went on to attack me or tribes of the North and West: Here is the list: Ngodigha1, Aro Okigbo, EagleNest, Diligence, freepeople, crissmac, Ch@nges, xtianh, Bandit C., guonno, guonno, nedu210, NRI PRIEST, mikeansy, manny4life, EzeUche, crackhouse My guess is most of you are Easterners and I am your friend and I love you ALL but would anyone of you be civil and debate my point with your strong counter-arguments or by abusing every one else, you think that you have won the argument? NO! It is clear to the neutrally minded because I did not only speak of the Asaba incident but also gave the origin of that terrible incident. I showed here on NL here that almost every one on NL today never saw the war and even if you did, you could only give an account of what you experienced or were told - a limited, one-sided story. The genocide allegations were looked into early enough in the war to reach a definite conclusion as the International Team of Observers were allowed by the Gowon government to inspect and observe the conduct of the war - the VERY first in human history of war! This deserves some credit but I am sure MOST of you will never and can never give any credit but to yourself. In a war where one side has the advantage of numbers, weaponry, strategy, momentum and more international support, yet he graciously allows an umpire to inspect his conduct of battle, this deserves credit my friends! The team of observes had even a polish military personnel in it and is it possible that such a person who has seen genocide in Austchwitz, Buchenwald, Sobibor, etc in its many forms still got no clue? Again, I appeal to you to debate really fair and not deviating from the question I raised but attacking me, and everyone else who doesn't share your point of view! crissmac[b] Posts: 23 « #59 on: Today at 12:21:45 PM » @ cyber G real smart move, using a foreigner's version to tell the Asaba story. i'm going to recommend a book for u that tells the story of what really went down in Asaba. the only condition is that you read it ith an unbiased and open mind. its called "Tears on the Niger"[/b] Criss, the book was written by someone who travelled the length and breadth of Nigeria and then Biafra as a Journalist and reporter, saw the war, talked to the belligerents, made copious notes from eye witnesses, multiple cross references to reach many of his submissions. However, in the case we were discussing, do you have ANY counter-arguments to what caused the killings in Asaba? Did you read that Adekunle, well before his incisive and decisive massively violent, fear-inducing campaigns was right there in Warri and he was not an actor in this killings? Before the killings, the civilians who hacked the Ibos to death and were doing the killings without the Army and Police? The other point is it is naive of you to think you can argue this point by asking me to go and read a book that possibly told a one-sided story without presenting your own personal thoughts after reading this book, if its claims were different! If Frederick Forsyth who by corroborated accounts was ". . .shamely pro-biafra. . ." wrote a book with accounts questioned by other independent sources, how do you now put forward an account by people like you whose primary motive is to sustain tribalism and the propagandization of several aspects of the war? I don't want us to deviate from the point I challenged you on: allegations of genocide were torn down even before was over. I feel sorry for those that were killed but you cannot discount origin of that very event because war obeys a modified version of Newton's 3rd law of motion - simply stated: for every action, there is an opposite reaction only that in this case it is neither equal nor collinear! Because 1, humans are not inanimate machines 2, war will never be over! The Japanese devastated Pearl Harbor during World War II, the Americans then got into the war fully and by the time the stranglehold was tightening on Nazi Germany with the Russians giving the fleeing Germans a massive beat-down, the US could plan their decisive strike on Hiroshima and Nagasaki! These strikes killed hundreds of thousands in one blow but whose fault is it? The Japanese needed to totally obliterate all the US aircraft carriers and do a whole lot more than just attack Pearl Harbour and when they retaliated, should we term that a crime of "genocide"? One more thing, with a measly 23 posts on NLand, I advise spending sometime here so you can know that some people here know what they are talking about and try to find out more information if they need to and don't just resort to diversionary or tribalism tactics! |
^ You speak a "good" game but I bet you did not read what informed my precise post. Read it again to see my post has nothing to do with some tribalistic BS like you imagine. Someone was spouting off another civil war propaganda about genocide and I exposed the origins of the incident. What is wrong with pointing young propagandized youths of today to facts recorded from a neutral perspective and backed with copious cross references? You should applaud that except you'd rather stifle vigorous debates that correct myths and propaganda that are often peddled on this forum shamelessly by tribalists. So, read the article and you should remove my name from your hurried post as it is totally disjointed from the anything in the issue under discussion. |
Mike, Eze, Relax: See here a snippet from the book I referred to earlier. Note that the claims of genocide were more exhaustively examined in latter stages of the book but this is a succinct account of what happened before the killings. Again, Nigeria was in a state of war at this time and this is not an attempt to say it was okay to have people killed but an unbiased account with several references in the book: The Asaba killings occurred after ". . .an Ibo shot at a senior Nigerian officer and hit him in the chest, almost killing him. An Ibo-hating major from Benin (a Bini) then apparently took charge, herded all the Ibo men and boys together and had them machinegunned to death. They. . ." Note that on page 164, the Biafran soldiers on their quick exit from Benin commandeered vehicles that did not belong to them, filled them with loot of the residents (Mid Westerners) and left the poorer Ibos who could not afford to leave. I am not here to make any judgement but please ask yourself honestly, if your house was burning with your family and kids in it, would you save your family first or save the plasma TV, home theater system, food while leaving the weaker kids who can't jump or run like you? I ask you to judge. When an armed robber over-powers you in your own home and is asking for everyone's money, what do you do? If you are unable to kill all of them in a single blow, do you put your life in danger and that of your kids by attacking their boss leaving the several other armed robbers to give you a merit award or expect instant retribution. Please, young kids of nowadays, use your brains to think otherwise your education, if at all, is wasted. If the fleeing Ibos had evacuated the citizens, then this might have reduced casualty rate or perhaps the hot-headed Ibo that indirectly killed several hundreds might have been removed. More importantly, if Ojukwu had not marched on the Mid West which had deliberately at the beginning of the war insisted on not joining any attack against any other part of Nigeria nor providing staging grounds for attack was so betrayed by the Biafrans, what did you expect them to do? ** Credit to Kats (I don't know if he would want me name-dropping him but he would recognize I am talking about him). His recommendation ensured that I dropped the other books I was reading at that time to read this one. In fact, I ended up having two copies while not realizing that I already had a copy but the cover had been removed while the other came with the cover intact. It brought me more breadth of the civil war issues much faster and I have not returned to continue reading the other book about Hitler and the WW 2 (Mein Kampf). Thanks man! **
|
Relax101:No doubt, I called for an intelligent debate but you are such a mentally-incapacitated midget, you know you cannot engage in any intellectual exercise, so you resort to insults. Well, I let that one insult point back to your family. Read this book, then come back and we can start: The Brothers' War: Biafra and Nigeria by John De St. Jorre. NOTE: My original post was not an invitation to a TRIBAL fight as I care NOT about such narrow ethnocentric issues and e-fights but vigorous debates. While you may not necessarily agree with everything, you will learn a different perspective which will serve you well in your life.
|
Fellow Nairalanders, it is that time of the year again when decisions and new year resolutions are hot and being made in their millions! From a political perspective, fellow human relations in real life and on NLand, would you care to share your resolutions? So, politically-savvy NLanders, here is a chance to share with the house perspectives that may influence others in very positive ways! |
Some people were bathed with the curse of tribalism on the day they were christened! Otherwise, you can see that the only thing that really upsets you is the songs featured have a different language than your tribe! Nothing can be done to save most tribalists here but worse is they poison their young ones with their bile before they keel over and die a miserable death they so deserve! |
^ Sango, you make some very good points BUT don't engage people who are e-aggressive like Eziachi and co. You started the thread well including your non-tribalism full disclosure comments, please stay with it. This is my opinion and thinking right now, not necessarily set in stone: 1. The status quo is not sustainable and we need change! 2. Your proposal of North - South indeed has a better chance of international support than sectional breakups. 3. A negotiated breakup involving everyone is far better than war and your initial proposals are sound. 4. Even before breakup, the East-West question needs to be addressed, what is the new nation going to do? Here is what I think: Two dominant animals cannot drink from a bowl at the same time - like making two rams drink from a bowl will lead to fights. What we can do is to accept this as a fact of life and our existence, understand, work with it and mutually respect each other. The southern part of Nigeria could be sub-divided into 3 large parts, the West, Middle and East. Factoring in the tendencies of the people, it is important to get our laws right which will b supreme and upheld to the hilt. I think westerners are very accommodating and very friendly and do not care if you live among them BUT when you begin to make arrogant and empty statements like you are a majority in the land where your fathers were allowed to rent, make a living and develop, you invite evil upon the land. Also, it is a very common sentiment that when an easterner is allowed to rent a place, he goes and brings everyone of his clan to occupy this space even at the detriment of the owner and in violation of the spirit of brotherhood and friendship that allowed their fathers or original migrants to stay. This attitude is very obvious in many NL for example. The westerners appear to be quite easy going even in foreign lands, work hard, make money and that is it for the most part but never make arrogant claims of how they are the majority in another man's land. They generally don't care much for whether they are not the governor or the president or leader so far as the people in those positions do a good job for what is the point of having your people there when you still suffer as much? So, a deliberate policy that while in the same country, a settler from a different part of the country will NEVER attain the same rights as the original owners and this is to legally make it impossible for some tribes or people to cause troubles in say a hundred years! Americans speak so highly about their founding fathers and the values they imbued into their Constitution from day one. It will be impossible in every place of work for anyone to hire solely his kinsman, neglecting the closest natives of that area. These laws will be defended so fiercely by the states, people will never need to resort to self help. In essence, an easterner who moves to a different part of the country e.g. Lagos or Ogun, does that in total respect of these laws which are non-negotiable and even an accidental slippage will not be deemed of deserving a minor punishment. By the same token, a westerner who moves to Port Harcourt or Owerri does that knowing he lives in the same country and brothers with the natives and guaranteed by law but even if they were in their thousands, they will have no permanent rights to claims ownership of an inch of that land or covet someone else's heritage or seek to obliterate their culture. The rights of every individual tribe to the smallest shall be defended as fiercely as that of any larger tribe - when the small or weak suffer, everyone suffers will be the rule. So, a tribe cannot decide to try and assimilate - either overtly or covertly - another tribe because they are small or weak. The armies shall be totally selected in equal measures from the constituents so that a majority does not exist in men, equipment or influence in favor of any part, etc. This is a minimum and people shall be sworn to citizenship, yes, so they are liable for their missteps. If a frame-work that exhaustively addresses this can be hatched, then the harmony of the majorities and minorities and their interests can be protected. One final thing, I saw some Dede1 saying he has some secret not meant for the public here on NL which is funny because there's nothing anyone can do without the agreement of others around you. Anything secret that cannot be discussed publicly speaks to the untrustworthiness and sinister motives of the subject. In fact, for someone who is an old man say in his 40s, only few years remain when he needs to be spoon fed and his ideas die a natural death when he is too weak or dies himself - just a thought. |
mikeansy:Tell me more about the bolded "genocide" you mentioned, otherwise you make good points in the rest of your post! You did not even come close to seeing what actually happened but most people throw out statements they gleaned from propaganda they've been fed for years! Give me a few references to support your position and arguments! The Hutu vs Tutsi genocide is well established and documented. Tell exactly what findings lead to that conclusion and hope we can have an intelligent debate! |
Just look at his mumufied face and big flat nose and you get the picture this guy was duuuummmbbb from the very beginning! How can a so called president look so unpresidential, inept and so so stupid by the look on his face!? Mark this down that in two weeks time, nothing will still be done about all this BS. Kai, I trust my own country oooo! Even, when you see the cops, you go respect - you're confident and sure of what they are doing! I have seen cops burst a house before, not militarised SWAT style cops, but normal cops! You'll just wanna see the shaite go down but with real weapons drawn, you just gotta take cover o! Now imagine all the military arms and the machinery that controls them! God forbid, if a citizen was merely kidnapped somewhere even on foreign soil, that won't be the end of the story! They will actually come look for you and do everything possible to get you back alive or take the body back at worst after killing your attackers! In Nigeria, the so called C-in-C is a real fooolish man and every boko haramite knows he can't do shaite - just talk and looking like a buffoon! I thought you tribalistic southerners always talk about how smart you are, educated, etc but there is strong evidence to tear down that argument in this Jonadoodle f-resident! Whoever allowed this guy to even enrol for a ph. d did so much disservice to humanity! The tribalists from the southern parts of Nigeria who chose a foool over competent and result-oriented individuals should hang their head in shame and repent of this grave error! |
The only thing in this thread is TRIBALISM - defend your tribesman and castigate anyone with a dissenting opinion! It is VERY clear that Jonaloss is too stupid and more stupid tribalistic Nigerians fed into his tribalism and voted for him. Of course, a large dose of rigging helped to make this a done deal. His name was Ebelechukwu, Azikiwe and most of you seeing him patronizing tribal affiliations so 419-ly will defend it even if the whole country were at the mercy of the guillotine. This dumbass Jonagoat accomplished nothing while he ruled his home state of Bayelsa but he promised you airports in every state and floating cities in the Niger Delta and you bought it! Truth is people who defend a failing child are worse failures themselves. The poster said he is still in the village and while that is wonderful but limiting your mind to village thinking is of no use to discussing national issues like this one. Spreading the blame to other tribes does not in any way change the fact that Jonazero is a failure. What has he added to that country till date except excuses, blaming everyone else, how he is not a general or lion, how you should live with the bombings while allocating billion naira for feeding only 2 families! Contracting the mossad and amoured vehicles to protect him while poor Nigerians are slaughtered in their thousands! Well, if you all like, call a spade a spade and stop thinking that it is okay because he is from your own tribe! But well, at the end of the day, even sickly and dead Yaradua would have accomplished much more than this dumbass ph. Dense fraudster of a president! |
So on top of the unparalleled clueless of Jonadunce, you guys still wanna vote for him for president? I wish you well in your journey to the bottomless pit o Nigeria-harams! |
Well bk. you made some good points but one thing is very germane in this conversation: Nigerians can not do anything about their past, but in the present, they followed the footsteps of their fore-runners by voting in the Goadtluck Jonothing! Yes, I know the south east and south south did not care about this man's pedigree and were further deceived when he began emphasizing that he is "Ebelechukwu" - an Igbo name! Personally, I would support anyone for president who was competent, a remarkable record of achievement in previous relevant positions, leadership capabilities, inspiring, decisive, etc. Jonadunce had none of such qualities but playing on tribalism, religion and sentiments of "I have no shoes, I will build airports in every state in Nigeria, I will build floating cities in the Niger Delta", etc, dodging all public debates and attempt to critique his records with considerable help in rigging the elections - this is the result! It's sad but now, Nigerians can recognize the evil of tribalism, ethnocentrism and religions and erase it from their brains when it comes to dealing with every issue even on NL. Crank up the heat on this useless 419 president to resign or be impeached. Nigerians have died in thousands already now but he want to protect his own 1 life with Israeli security, is that fair and using Nigerian money to pay for it? Imagine even as someone living in a foreign country, how comforting to know that under most circumstances, the government will fight for every inch of encroachment on the well being of its citizens until it guarantees them succor and safety. In Nigeria, Jonadunce wants to just do his time, steal money, do nothing and be in history books. . .how sad! |
I think you are ALL WRONG and Jona is ALL RIGHT! He said before that he is not a General or Lion, so what else do you people want? All he could do is budget ~ N 1 Trillion for security, what else do you people want? If he had just said some politically correct statement on how he was on top of the situation, it won't stop this BH from plying their trade. In fact, maybe he is using this tactics to cow BH by telling them it doesn't matter how much bombing they do, HE will not do anything! Your commander in chief and GCFR says he will not do anything, so the Armed Forces can go to bed now. Well, Naija wanted this fresh soup of hot air - and it seems the country will roast in it! |
I have read a few "unbiased" books from people that actually saw the war, the international team of observers including member(s)from Poland (who know what genocide looks like - WW 2) and none concluded this was a genocide. So is this writer lying and spreading propaganda even before he makes the first sentence? Were hiroshima and nagasaki genocides? Was the Russian away match to Berlin genocide? |
All the BH BS is happening because of a weak, stupide, clueless and liverless president rigged in based only on tribalism and religion. That is one issue. Another important thing is this idea of claiming some other peoples' lands, why? One or two people speaking here does not mean that an entire people want to be subsumed in your ideology or tribe. If they want to make pacts, they sure no what to do and let them make their choices because after getting away from the north, they may have to deal with people who are interested only in claiming them, their land and resources. This will then create another HUGE problem. |
^ LOLZ. . .how can? . . .when he only soaked cassava (garri) and small roasted fish (0-1-0) until his quarter-baked "ph. Dense" graduation! ![]() |
^ Truth, this guy will NOT do anything even for all the money that is being stolen - yes, billions more are disappearing through the Umberreella of a wife and let's see what happens in 2015: maybe he would want a second term and re-promise Nigerians all the things he has been spouting off till date?. In the meantime, well Nigerians are basically stuck with a Jonadunce president that will make even sickly Yaradua seem like Einstein! |
LOLZ. . .he has to eat all the foot he didn't eat as a poor, shoeless kid you know! We tell una make people vote for someone who's got some record of achievement, some substance and not luck, tribalism, religion or fresh air, but una no gree! Well, this is what a soul-less country gets when it promote tribalism, ethnocentrism and religion above simple common sense! |
Most people no even send again hence no more comments?? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 (of 125 pages)
