₦airaland Forum

Righteousness2:
These set of release i believe is for Hezebollah Terrorists in lebanon.
I Believe a War with Hezebollah is Imminent and the US knows that.

Hezebollah terrorists are Presently forming warriors right now and terrorizing Israel from the Northern border. No one is making noise now or warning them to desist and maintain themselves

When the APPLE of GOD'S eye begin to gaza hezbollah and lebanon, you will begin to hear all sorts of Cries of Genocide?l, Innocent ooo here and there.
Cry that cry now and warn Hezebollah before ISRAEL gaza the whole place.

IF YOU ARE SILENT WHEN ISRAEL IS ATTACKED!
YOU MUST REMAIN SILENT WHEN ISRAEL RESPONDS!

Hamas is a done deal for extermination. ISRAEL will enter rafah to finish up the last terriorist battalion in the next few weeks.

GOD BLESS ISRAEL FOREVER

wirinet:
Why dem no arrest Mark Zuckerberg when he come naija, abi Facebook dey pay tax for all the Facebook ads money dem dey collect from Nigerians?

wirinet:
Pity I am not a lawyer. Please explain how this concept applies to the two Binance employees. Does it then mean all Binance employees including cleaners and drivers can be arrested for tax crimes of the company?

wirinet:
My brother, Ribabu behaves like he never went to school, much less claim to have studied law. How can you arrest an employee of a company for alleged infractions of a corporate body? Its like arresting and locking up the driver of Glo for tax infractions commited by the company? It seems Ribabu and his APC supporters don't understand the principle of liability (limited liability). You cannot even punish the chairman/MD of a company for crimes commited by the company, except it is in his personal capacity.

femi4:
Nobody said that's the objective. They are only pointing out the benefit at old age, and not necessarily a biological child

femi4:
It's not shallow, it takes a trained child to remember you at old age. Besides you were there for kid in his first 20-30 yrs. It's not too much to ask from him to be there for you in your last 10yrs

correctguy101:
On this matter, selfish is good..

Don't say shallow.

As for the bolded, ah. Don't make me laugh please..

Anyhoo, there must be continuation...

Righteousness2:
JESUS CHRIST, the Savior of the world who paid the Price for the Salvation for all of Humanity.
JESUS CHRIST, the one and only means by which humans can be saved.
JESUS CHRIST , the One and Only way to Heaven.

chaddy16:
Big Fishes eat smaller ones in their under water world

Rollingdollar:
You may regret it. Let me tell you someone's experience. When i was undergraduate i had one professor as friend, his wife died some yrs back without a child before her demise and after her dealth the prof refuses to remarry and have children. He said to me their no need for him to remarry since he doesn't want children. This man loves his job so much and the money keep rolling in. He built a very big duplex, has a very nice car and he is healthy. Few yrs later after i graduated and started working. I got posted to delta state , so i don't use to see him often again. This yrs i got my posting back to the state he reside and that gives me ample time to check on him. When i got their he looks old and depress. Geting closer i obverse he suffered stroke and it seem even the university forced him to retire due to his health. The first thing he manage to asked me was. Hope you are married ? I responded, yes and he added make sure you have kids now that you are young don't end up like me. I went round his house , more than six rooms they all look dirty, the whole compound look empty, the cars all parked some sold off . He said he had to deactivate most of his bank apps and ussd because most family and domestic workers he employed now steal from him because they knew he didnt have the strength to monitors most thing again. He said had it been he had a child of his own. That child might probably be the one to be in charge of most crucial things in his life now that he is old

Joemavel:
That's an abnormal family. I'm raising kids and I shower them with love, my own family growing up we aren't perfect but when in need that's when you see and know you got people. I am talking about a normal family and not those abnormal ones.

yemmit90:
Like someone said, only the future can teach you a lifetime lesson, no amount of explanation or recommendation can change a mind of someone like you. It is ok not to want children but everything wrong when you talk down on its importance. Ideally, you are calling your parents fools or self- centred for aiding your existence. It is quite logical not to have children if you can't cater for them but don't ever dismiss the important of having them.

willyblinx:
Selfishness towards who? The children that do not yet exist?

These type of statements are the things that. Put unnecessary pressure on women that are yet to give birth. Having kids should be a choice and not everyone wants to do so.

You are happy just looking at your kids, great I am happy for you. However, we should understand that that’s not what would make others happy. Our desires differs.

OpulentP:
If u live long u go regret ur decision, if u did not live long, u no go regret ham

yemmit90:
What if the said good man leaves you at old age? Remember he owe you nothing.

Have you ever been close to old people before? Old age and sickness that is accomplices with it is not a child play at all. At this stage, only your biological children cares, they may not be with you physically but they will be there with you emotionally.

You need to visit some old people before it too late to change your decision.

Joemavel:
You see conditional love, that's what you get from every corner you turn in life. Except the one from family, when you grow old and you suddenly realise that no figures of such affectionate love, you'll marvel. Father, mother and kids are the people who mostly gives these but by then when you're all alone, it'll dawn on you

Klass99:
My sympathies for what you are going through but I can not relate because unlike you I don't desire or want to have children but you do. I pray the good Lord grants you your heart's desire.

Your reasons for wanting a child/children leaves me perplexed and again I can not relate because there are too many good people on earth I can interact with, too many novels to read, movies to watch, exercises to do and activities to engage in, for me to bored from the absence of a child.

I also can not relate to wanting a child so I can send them on errands. I genuinely like doing things by myself and for myself it is how I stay active and avoid being lazy.

Time will tell indeed and guess what time has told me? That I was right to become self aware, enough to know that I don't want kids, independent minded and critical in my thinking to know that I don't have to follow the crowd and do what others are doing, if it is not what I want.

CoronaVirusPro:
The future will educate you better. I don’t think anyone can educate you about that.

If you really want to have a glimpse of what it looks like, check all those class of people that said same in their youthful ages, reality humbled them in their old age and started having kids at the dying hour.

Reality will “Personally” dawn on you. How you accept it, will determine your mental state and response.

Just be patient. 20 years from now will tell a lot.

Kingpele:
Your reasons are selfish...your parents wasn't a billionaire before they decided to bring u into this world...running away from responsibility is the height of cowardice...getting married and rising kids is what makes u a real man except u want to become a rev fr ...I feel so happy just looking at my 5 kids and lemme the truth I started making real Money when children started coming because I had to double my hustle so as to be able to take care of my responsibilities and still enjoy my life...today am richer than when I was alone ...moreover my wife is doing business and she contribute to some extent...

YelloweWest:
You will totally regret it. There's absolutely nothing as rewarding than having a child.

At some point your wealth will become meaningless.

tochez24:
Fact my brother💯

It will dawn on him at old age, he will see shege😆😆

SeniorGee:
Nope, I earned my yearly salary in 2weeks. If you're not lazy, you will make it. Nothing like menial jobs, there is dignity of labour here. Its challenging but you can do it...

God1000:
Israel should not provoke USA

However, White House officials insist that Washington will not halt its weapon transfers to Israel, and insist that they share Israel’s goal of eliminating Hamas in Gaza.

PoliteActivist:
You'll say nothing further my dear because you have no argument. That's why instead of reasoning you are throwing tantrums. You're arguing nonsense. You simply don't reason deeply enough.

In all those instances the "I" is absent. Also, you have to understand the content of Cogito. Descartes said he'd doubt anything he could conceivably doubt. Then he forgot to doubt the real likelihood that he as "I" didn't exist - that only thoughts existed and that "I" is also merely thought/memory.

PoliteActivist:
Falacy of avoiding the issue. Already gave you instances where there are just thoughts and nothing else - when people are dead, possessed, people one meets in dreams, etc.

wirinet:
I don't think religion can ever die. Religion thrives on ignorance and/or poverty. And the religious, political and business elites make sure they keep populace poor, ignorant and helpless. Infact religion will continue to grow within poor impoverished countries of the world.

budaatum:
That "I", is a flaw in Descartes thinking. He does not think therefore he exists, but he first exists as a recognisable "I", and then he, that "I", thinks. The fact that he did not recognise that implies he never doubted his own existence to begin with, and nor did he doubt that he thought.

And the reason it's an important distinction is that it has the potential to mislead the likes of Politeactivist who has been promoting Descartes here as evidence of his own non-existence and the existence of only his thought, as if his thought appears out of thin air.

Please don't let that dishonest Politeactivist pit us against one another. I'm certain your arguement with him is unrelated to the one I have with him, and he's only dragged you here to fuel his nonsense.

budaatum:
Descartes assumed his own existence by using the word "I". And that is a flaw in his argument, since it shows he couldn't actually doubt his own existence.

But explain to me how and why you keep promoting this Descartes nonsense here if you know it was flawed and had been proven wrong as we've repeatedly argued it was.

I've made it bold so you can't ignore it as you ignore all questions you are asked.

PoliteActivist:
This is too easy. FIRST, you have no way of knowing if a thought requires a thinker because you are not sure the true nature of thought - just as you are not sure the true nature of the rest of reality!
SECOND, even if we allow the above, you are not sure the thoughts are from "I". We basically don't know where thoughts come from.
Oh you asked for an instant - people who died and came back were thinking while dead

PoliteActivist:
Below is my final QED on DeepSight about this topic. Read it carefully. It summarizes everything:

Disregarding that the statement is faulty in itself,
Here's the logical sequence of events:
1) There is thinking (this we are fairly sure about)
2) Therefore there must be a thinker (we have no way of knowing this unless we claim we know the true nature of existence, which we don't! Also, the only describable attribute of the thinker is thinking - thinking is the thinker!)
3) That thinker must be "I" (obviously not true)

There's clearly all sorts of thinking going on in a dream, and while "I" is unconscious or possessed, or even dead (as narrated by people who came back), who is doing the thinking? As with many things about existence, we don't know the true nature of thinking.
QED

PoliteActivist:
Buda, below is what I wanted ODB to tell you, because he was there. I wrote it to deepsight on Feb 16 on my last thread (Einstein):

As for cogito, I was expecting you to ask how when I told you it was disproved but you kept mute. It was proved wrong not long after Descartes expounded it. Here goes. You can't prove the existence of something by starting with the assumption that the thing already exists. Thus the statement should be: "There is thinking therefore I am", which of course doesn't make any sense.

wirinet:
The Jesus character was a pacifist. All his actions and preaching were pacifist in nature except where he was said to have beaten people selling in the temple. I believe that narrative was added by be Catholic authorities. It makes no sense for Jesus to go to a Jewish temple he was not the chief rabbi and start fighting people selling religious ornaments.
His pacifist doctrines includes;
Turning the other cheek
Stopping the lynching of a woman accused of adultery
Entering the house and eating with gentiles
Eating together on the same table with his followers and disciples. (Abomination in todays Christianity)
Commanding his disciples not to fight the authorities upon his arrest.
Preaching that give what belongs to caesar unto Caesar and God unto God.
Forgive all those who sins against you against the prevailing "an eye for an eye".

correctguy101:


What and who's human?

PoliteActivist:
LordReed tell him
Something I've been saying since forever. Go check out my last thread, where I was trying to tell DeepSight this and he was arguing.
Infact I'll find the debate and post it here just for the heck of it!