DeepSight's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DeepSight's Profile › DeepSight's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 (of 806 pages)
tctrills:Yes Biden was corrupt. That is the difference between me and you. I admit it. But Trump, whose own is open and writ large, remains a saint yo you. Despite everything he does openly. This phenomenon is scary and must be studied in mass psychology in future. |
RodgersAkpafu:Imagine one of them saying that anyone saying Trump is corrupt can't be taken seriously . . . I mean this guy does his own corruption openly and yet! What is it called when you negotiate a settlement deal with a department you supervise? ? ? ? I know that to be conflict of interest but somehow since it's Trump all known principles of law and ethics are irrelevant! |
tctrills:Lol, so Trump is not corrupt. I don hia. |
bemeruca:While saying that 180 years of failure to grant citizens rights in America is "irrelevant." Well done. As I keep saying Europe stagnated for 1000 years. Its called the middle ages. But you will say that is irrelevant history, no be so? |
RodgersAkpafu:Those guys threw sh*t on the capitol walls and you are right, if that happened here they would call us animals. But they actually defend what those guys did, they are happy they are pardoned and now they are happy Trump will corruptly compensate them! |
bemeruca:Why do you say "education alone?" What is wrong with you? Why do you try to isolate each factor we point out? No matter what we say, you try to pretend we are saying that is the only cause. How many times do I have to shout that there are myriad interlocking factors? If I talk about history, you will say its in the past. If I talk about climate you will say that is long story. If I talk about colonization you will say I am blaming whites. If I talk about time, you will say laziness. And yet you dare talk about greed, the same greed that is common to humanity and which right nw is on lavish open display with Trump without an iota of condemnation from you and tctrills and co. No one ever isolated one factor alone and its madness to keep saying "its not this alone, its not that alone" when we all agree its many things. |
bemeruca:Excuses. Of course I said it that when anything wrong is pointed out with white society thats when your own excuses will start. How is what she said irrelevant? You are shouting about the state of a society that is 66 years independent and saying that its irrelevant that it took a white society 180 years to think its fair to give its own citizens equal rights - and interestingly those citizens are still the ones you condemn for greed, laziness, poor culture etc. No one can make up this level of absurdity. Its surreal. |
GracieX3:Phew! Thank you! |
RodgersAkpafu:I tire. The guy talks like greed is a unique black African trait. |
TV01:You stated that even in a century black Africans will make no progress. You went on to challenge me to point out one single area of progress since the period of independence. You didn't believe there was any. That is an extremist view. It is an overly dim view of an entire race. It shows conclusively that you do not believe that this race can do a single positive thing ever. This is more extremely racist against the black African than the most extremist white supremacist view I know of. And when it was shown to you that Education has massively improved and that black South Africa has grown in its middle class, you waved those aside as meaningless. It's clear that there is nothing blacks can ever do positive in your sight and that shows that this conversation has always been pointless to engage. On that note, I rest. |
TV01:Wait a minute, before I even address anything here, are you Israeli? What is "that's how we do?" |
tctrills:You were the one with a silly and presumptuous claim. |
Fekumzi123:How can you eat a rat, including its tail. Barbaric. |
raumdeuter:I knew you would pretend not to see this - Fourthly this was ended as far back as 1968. Are you suddenly going that far back to find the cause of absentee fatherism today - and is this not odd given that you have complained each time I mention a factor in the past as a cause of anything? Are you not the same person that demands evidence of laws and policies strictly in the present day which affect races? How come you are now reaching to an extinct 30s to 60s rule to claim as the cause of absentee fatherism up till today? Same you who has constantly demanded policies and laws that are current today or nothing! Same you who has complained that I reach into the past to explain things. Shior! |
Fekumzi123:You are eating a rat. |
TV01:Israel has had a long and complicated 3000 year history of suffering in which they have only bounced back in the last 70 years. So how can you say this? For a good two thousand years these people were scattered across the world and the subject of every kind of persecution. The mere fact that you live in the period of their home coming and resurgence is no reason to dismiss the last 2000 years. And what makes you reason as though the upward swing of every group must happen in the same period? What I have witnessed is wholescale regression. Please provide metrics to show long-term progress on key social metrics as a starter for 10Are you for real? Okay, lets take one obvious one. Education. In 1960, circa 10-15% of the population of sub-Saharan Africa was educated. Today, circa 70 per cent are. But its gratingly painful that I would have to piont out something as basic as this. Because you are effectively saying nothing good has happened at all in sub-Saharan Africa post-colonialism! How anyone can make such a blanket claim is utterly beyond me. This is just absurd even if one looks at the general evolution which is natural to the process of societies - movement from predominant military government to predominant democracies, technological advancement applicable to the whole world, greater infrastructure across board, and many more things to point at. How is SA better for your average SA since majority rule?The black middle class has boomed as opposed to the position bequeathed by years of apartheid obviously. Again, its gratingly painful that I have to point out something like this. Because it shows how closed you are even to the most obvious changes. Sadly this just shows how deep your prejudice goes. It is now obvious that even if I were to stretch the marker to 1000 years from now, you will say Africans will achieve nothing. I am sorry to say, but tell me how this is not a racist and prejudiced view of Africans? The has to be "sance" for there to be a "rene"It would be useless to discuss the glories of some past African Kingdoms in light of what you are saying here. |
raumdeuter:Ijebos is truly right when he speaks to your incapacity to think. Did you read what I wrote at all? Do you fail to realize that you are saying the government destroyed poor families? How does that help your argument that blacks are simply useless? It doesnt. Secondly I highlighted words for you. That didnt help you? Thirdly how does that answer for the poverty of black families in the first place which then made them vulnerable to this? Fourthly this was ended as far back as 1968. Are you suddenly going that far back to find the cause of absentee fatherism today - and is this not odd given that you have complained each time I mention a factor in the past as a cause of anything? Are you not the same person that demands evidence of laws and policies strictly in the present day which affect races? How come you are now reaching to an extinct 30s to 60s rule to claim as the cause of absentee fatherism up till today? The double standards, hypocrisy and dishonesty are pitifully laid bare! |
raumdeuter:"A regulation that was formerly applied in certain jurisdictions that denied poor families welfare payments in the event that a man resided under the same roof with them." https://www.encyclopedia.com/law/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/man-house-rule You have mentioned this before, how does it help your case? I will presume your argument would be that men stayed away as it was profitable to the woman who could then get welfare. This does not answer the root of the why because only deep poverty could lead to that in the first place so what you need to answer for is the cause of that deep poverty. Furthermore you are arguing against yourself if you are saying that the law encouraged absentee fatherism effectively. Because that would be the system working against the stability of poor families. Now take a cold hard look at the words i have highlighted in bold red above and think carefully before responding. |
raumdeuter:Stop dancing around and give the answer. After all your racist hero Charlie Kirk gave his own answer: that there weren't equal rights for blacks. That was his reason. Give yours. |
raumdeuter:As for hip hop, its your side that claims that is a cause. |
GloriousGbola:Nor mind am! |
raumdeuter: tctrills:You are just trying to make simplistic caricatures of hard anthropology and the laugh is on you both. I dont have to keep repeating that there are many interlocking factors. |
TV01:Another response to this. Could you select one Caucasian tribe and conclude that since they were belligerent over centuries then Europeans as a whole would not make progress? Does that make sense to you? Yet that is exactly what you have done here. And mark: no African violence can hold a candle to the violence of Europe in terms of breadth, scale, age, repetition, and sheer brutality. |
TV01:Why is Israel still fighting its neighbours 3000 years later? You see? Lessons - ' ' 1. Recurring decimals are not unique to black people 2. One negative recurring decimal does not mean that there is no progress overall. |
tctrills:Of course not, its work in progress and its not a journey of a single day or even a single lifetime. I just reminded TV01 how your beloved Israel has literally been in the same conflict for thousands of years, since he ws bringing up the conflict of the Fulani and Yoruba as proof that Africa will stagnate or regress in the next 200 years. By the way do you share that view? |
TV01:I grant that certain things tend to be like a recurring decimal among certain people. If I mention the history of Israel and how they are still stuck in violent cycles you will not want to hear that one will you? Nonetheless it doesnt make sense to claim that you cannot see progress in black African nations even within your lifetime. Happily, you dont have to admit it. It will occur regardless of your opinion. And even if it didnt occur, your lifetime is too small to be the judge of the matter. How many people lived and died through the stagnant middle ages of Europe? There can and will be an African Renaissance. |
TV01:Thats absolutely unfair, my epistles have noted the issues we have such as corruption - which are simply not unique to us. By contrast, you lot pick those issues and act as though they are genetic flaws unique to black people as created by God. |
raumdeuter:I am still waiting for the reason. Oh wait - dont tell me its hip hop?!!!! ![]() |
raumdeuter:Dont be silly. Answer the question. |
raumdeuter:Pls dont try to flip your own logic on me. Its tctrills that brought Peruvian desert into the matter and I am asking you if Peru is now a developed first world country. If it is not then the argument you were championing falls apart on that score. This is aside the fact that I troubled myself to extract the differences in the deserts. In fact, one dessert helps another, but forget it. You guys are too lazy for that level. |
tctrills:If you know the bold to be true, you have been wasting our time arguing against the obvious. Can you also discount the circumstances of birth? Abi it doesn't matter if someone was a homeless orphan and you compare his struggle to that of Dangote's child? And if he reminds you that he was a homeless orphan you shout "excuses!" |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 (of 806 pages)
.
.
. Your Somalis are turning grand larceny into an export grade commodity and you are opening the "excuse exchange". Brother please
.
.