DeepSight's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DeepSight's Profile › DeepSight's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 (of 809 pages)
NOOOOEETIKKKYYYY! What kind of escapist response is that? ? ? ? ? ? ? Address my post jaaaaree! |
noetic15:Ah, Noetic. . . Has Jesus appeared to you before? Remember that Chris Okotie asserted that T.B. Joshua appeared to him in his bedroom. |
Noetic - This is the last of what you wrote Noetic: Note that sensing the insufficiency of your responses, you promised to "be right back", but never returned. 1. Mark 10:18I must state that these posts are escapist to say the least. You did no justice to Mark 10:18 AT ALL. Would Jesus really have actively discouraged any person from coming to the recognistion of his identity? Did he not repeatedly talk about belief in him? Why then would he try to discourage people from recognising him as God? This does not make any sense AT ALL. "Do not call me good: ONLY GOD is Good" - is more than sufficient evidence that he did not regard himself as God. Regarding 1 timothy 2:5; recall that it not only refers to Jesus as mediator, but states :"the man" Jesus Christ. I sincerely believe that you will agree with me that you have not even started to address John 14: 28. Noetic, when there are so many verses in the Bible suggesting that Jesus IS NOT God, you certainly must excuse the skeptic when he doubts the deity of Christ, because the Bible itself says more to repudiate it than it does to encourage it! Now i charge you to avert your mind to the prayer in gethsemane as i analysed it here: The most spectacular of all his prayers, for me, is the statement in Gethsemane – “Nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt” I am definite that this prayer as analysed is the most damning piece in the Bible against the suggestion that Jesus is God! Have at it! |
noetic15:Ok, let us return to it. . . |
Noetic, recall that you yourself stated that in those posts you were "setting a background". . .You talked Isaiah, Before Abraham was, I AM, ETC. You did NOT address my verses. |
Pastor AIO:Pastor, this dissapoints me somewhat. Can there not be a summit of all meaning and existence? Is that quantity not an absolute? How do you drag down the meaning of perfection to refer only to qualifications of degrees of functions in created things? Does it not occur to you that the very idea of perfection must per force have a summit? Beyond creation? |
noetic15:Oh please Noetic, notice i rated you very highly? So don't resort to lies. If you visit the thread you will see that you promised to be right back to conclude what you had started, but you never returned! |
dgreatrock:Whoever told you its a battle? We are rubbing minds here. |
Siddharta Gautama, the Buddha, never said a word about an almighty Deity that anyone must worship. He spoke only about liberation of the "self" from the cycle of birth and death, and attainment of enlightenment, or Nirvana. |
Krayola:Krayola - note that i indicated that Perfection may be manifested in duality. See here - Deep Sight: |
noetic15:HOW DARE YOU SAY THIS? DAVID WAS ROUNDLY ROASTED IN THAT THREAD TO THE EXTENT THAT HE TOOK TO HIS HEELS. YOU ATTEMPTED SOME FEEBLE REDEMPTION OF THE "JESUS IS GOD" CAMP, BUT FAILED TO ADDRESS ANY OF MY VERSES. YOU BOTH SHOWED EXTREME ESCAPISM IN THAT THREAD, AND THE THREAD IS THERE FOR ANY OBJECTIVE OBSERVER TO DRAW HIS CONCLUSIONS. |
^^^ ANSWER HIM NOW, NOETIC! And also explain why the words in KJV 1 Jn 5 v 7 have been expunged from all modern versions of the Bible! Explain! |
[quote author=Tudór link=topic=354053.msg4956580#msg4956580 date=1258630233]I'm also terribly bored. For almost 3 weeks now i load the page and can't find interesting topics to comment on. I might be tempted to move over to Romance and sexuality.[/quote]Tudor - You dare not speak: cos you hardly ever open any threads yourself, so you cannot sit back and lament if there are no interesting threads! Nezan:And shamefully, it has to be said that the Moderators allowed him to do this. |
noetic15:Hint: Open-Mindedness, Quality of Thoughts and Posts. . . |
davidylan:David, i will hold you to this. |
↑ Pastor AIO/ m-nwankwo/ easylogic/ Justcool/ Viaro/ Prizm/ KunleOshob↑ ↑Krayola/ Jesoul/ Dususpace/ KAG↑ Noetic The Seeker Mantraa / Toneyb Tudor/ Bawomolo Wirinet Manmustwac Shakerz Mazaje /Chrisbenegor Olabowale Olaadegbu/ Huxley Maykelly Ogaga4Luv ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ Davidylan / Abuzola |
Don't worry. . . its seasonal i suppose. . . |
justcool:Hi Just Cool. Its always sooo great to hear from you. Your question is extremely profound, and i verily suspect that no human being can ever come to grips with it, given the fact that it deals with events happening outside this physical universe. Such knowledge probably can only be transmitted through genuine revelation. Nevertheless, i will attempt the question on two grounds. The first ground will be my understanding of what is set forth within the message, and the second ground will be my honest, most limited, most imperfect, human perspective. The first ground - I read within the message that God in HIS Divine perfection emitts unimaginably great heat and energy, and that after the first creation, the gradual cooling-off of the radiations from God precipitate the forming of further creations further and further away from God. I understand from this that God therefore only directly spawned the primordial spiritual worlds, and that the continued precipitations/ radiations from these worlds, bearing God's white-hot creative-heat, as they cooled off, formed further worlds, and ultimately, the world of gross matter. As always, i did not just swallow this hook, line and sinker without thought, and i find that there are reasons why this makes sense to me within my world View. These reasons are - 1. I can clearly sense and even see the existence of non-physical things even in this world: love, thought, dreams, telepathy, pyscho-kinesis, the list is endless. Accordingly i am firmly aware that i am a being that exists and is real even without my physical body, arms, legs, nose, mouth, etc. I have often noted that each human being "hears" the thoughts of his own mind clearly. Now since these are not audible sounds, he clearly does not hear them with his physical ears. This makes it clear that the inner man has ears of its own. The inner mind. The Inner Sipiritual. 2. Thus i see that the world of matter is not all that exists. 3. Given that the physical body dies, i am also aware that the spiritual part becomes disembodied from the material part at death. I do not assert this as proof of anything to anyone, but to my mind it seems clear that the spiritual being will necessarily exist within a realm of its own nature, just as the material body existed in a material world. 4. Thus spiritual realms do exist. And by the very transitory nature of matter it seems clear to me that such realms pre-date and post-exist matter, if i may use such terms. It really is like saying that the world of forms and ideas is eternal, while matter is transitory. 5. If this is true, then it falls into place as espoused by the mesage that the direct creation of God, is primordial spiritual, and not material. [b]Now there is a little piece of scientifice thinking that crystalizd this very clearly for me a short while ago. Here i dovetail into my human understanding - I was staring at a block of ice, which i had pulled out of my glass of beer. As i stared at it it began to melt, turning into water in the tray. I know from physics that given time that very water will dry up into the air. It does not dissappear, it changes form, just as surely as if we put the Ice in a heated pan, it will become water, and eventually steam, and the steam will float of airily into the air. It struck me that Ice represents gross matter - it is hard and tangible, like your physical body. When heated however, it becomes steam, which is like your spirit - intangible and mobile, flexible, and dynamic, able to float, soar, move easily. More importantly, it struck me that since in physics, greater heat causes greater motion, then the intangible (steam in this instance) must necessaily be more heated than the tangible. [/b] (This is why great passion feels to us like heat in our chest, and emotionlessness is described as "cold" ![]() Thus the spiritual is more heated that the physical - and accordingly, is closer to the ultimate heat - which is God. I thought - if the spiritual is heated and intangible, just how heated and intangible will the Ultimate heat be? That hints at the pure divinity of God. When the process is looked at in the reverse, it immediatley bears out that which is espoused in the Grail Message: That the cooling off of great heat, will eventually result in the appearance of hard matter! - Just as surely as if steam is cooled off, it will become water, and eventually, further cooling will result in the hard immovable ice! This thinking led me to see the simple and yet flawless beauty and scientific accuracy in the assertion that the cooling-off of God's radiations precipitates the development of further forms of creation, and ultimately hard matter. It also helps me see and understand death and the rising of the spiritual towards God, and toward the primordial spiritual, as a journey of increasing intangibility, and thus increasing purity. It also helps me understand a dream i once had where i was playing a football game in a far world among the stars: and all the motion seemed far more heated, hectic, faster, and more fluid and energetic than in this world. I can understand now that there is greater fluidity in intangibility. Thus greater life in the spiritual. Thus ultimate life, in the ultimate heat: God. But i go too far, as i believe i have already said that which i intended to say. |
Pastor AIO:Smart Alec, you. I may approach this in three ways. First, mark that i specifically said that things outside time are permanent: unchanging (e.g: the idea of numbers). But things within time are by that very circumsciption things that grow and change. God's perfection lies in his immutability, and the laws that spring therefrom. These laws govern and sustain created things: which though can never be perfect in the purest sense as God is, nonetheless carry the hallmark of HIS symetry as Universal Laws, and thereon cannot in any wise be described as an imperfect creation. It is thus normal, perfect, and to be expected that things within time will grow, change and die or transit from one form to another. This does not apply to God, existing as HE does outside time. I may also approach it from another angle. I stated that God does not do imperfect things, because he is unchanging and immutable. Sparking a creation into existence is not in any wise an imperfect thing. It is rather a limited thing: in that it is not timeless, like God, and therefore it is not God. But given that the universe (or creation) is governed by HIS immutable laws (e.g: magnetism, both spiritual and physical), then although it grows and changes, it remains within and eternally circumscibed by those immutable and perfect laws of God, and as such once again, bears in this sense the attribute of God's immutable laws - and thus cannot be said to be imperfect. So it should be clear that although the universe grows and changes, its actuating forces, as well as the laws that govern it - are adamantine divine precepts which cannot change. Thus the universe in this respect bears the hallmark of God's immutability and accordingly cannot be described as imperfect. Finally i may approach it from the concept of duality: light and dark; postive and negative; good and evil. . . If the proposition of duality is held to be true, then perfection only exists in balance, and accordingly elements such as change, imperfection, defects. . . are natural reverses of immutability, perfection and non-defects. . . and holistic perfection can only exist in such balance! Note that i indicated that the supposed "imperfections" which we see are really hallmarks of balance. Many examples can be cited of seemingly evil or disastrous things which are in reality checks and balances for a perfect ecosystem. |
Pastor AIO:God IS. God is the primordial necessary (as opposed to contingent) quantity from which all existence arises. Some of the ideas I have tried to put across on the oneness of infinity, to some degree, i think, indicate that God is an absolute. Accordingly, God is immutable and unchangeable, all the laws of existence springing forth from HIS core principle: which is the oneness of infinity. An unchangeable being stands outside time, because beings within time change, grow, die, etc. Outside of time, you have stillness: permanence - this is what God is. He is thus adamantine. These attributes connote the perfection that i speak of. Thus God, in my mind, cannot do unbalanced or imperfect things. Which is why we may want to realise that seeming "failures" in creation are really elements of Balance. None of this is compatible with a sacrifice for sins occuring before the world came into existence? Pastor AIO:I think we have dealt exhaustively with this question in your discourse on ethics with Krayola and Chrisbenegor. |
Hi Pastor, i have read and digested with great delight your excellent write-ups. Once you started out on the path, i could see where you were heading, and i must say that it makes some sense to me. However i have one cardinal question which I believe goes to the root of the matter, and borders on the very nature of God himself, or is perfection, or the absence of it. That question is as follows: Let us assume as you say, that the sacrifice occurs before creation, or before time (like you, i am uncomfortable with the word "before", but what can we do. . .) Let us imagine a timeless state where only God himself in his immutability is. At this point creation is yet to spring forth from HIM. If at this point, he has already concluded a "fall" and a "sacrifice" to "redeem" that fall, ever before creation, then this irrevocably suggests that neither HE nor HIS work are perfect. If he could have seen such before the world, he could surely have made things such that it would not happen that man would "fall" or that there would have to be such a bloody sacrifice. So to my mind, the only problem with your proposition is that it per force detracts from the perfection of God. And God is intrinsically perfect and immutable, so how can this be? It might interest you to explore with m_nwankwo the Grail Message perspective on what the fall of man actually refers to. . . |
You said something about the death and resurection of christ occuring in Eternity. What do you really mean by that, can you explain please? Thanks. |
KenTimos:And men are not? ? ? |
Pastor. . . ? |
Pastor, there is one final question waiting for you HERE: https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria?topic=335826.msg4869008#msg4869008 |
Pastor AIO:Beautifully said, Pastor. I wonder why people cannot see that this applies directly to being "Christian" or "muslim" or whatever. Not he who knows the book, but he who walks the walk. |
[quote author=~Sauron~ link=topic=352037.msg4930015#msg4930015 date=1258302379]By natural order, it is easier for a man to cheat than a woman. It takes EVERYTHING for a woman to go down in that manner cos she musta thunk it through before proceeding. Women don't cheat by accident like MEN so i stand by my words that a cheating woman CAN poison her husband. Tsk Tsk!!![/quote]Not in the modern realm, Sauron. Wake up, this is neither a sharia society nor 13th Century Europe. |
[quote author=~Sauron~ link=topic=352037.msg4927005#msg4927005 date=1258237220]Infidelity is a cardinal sin. Kick her out like POLIO!!!!!!!! I am surprised you are still asking questions. A woman that cheated on you will POSION you.[/quote]Do men (who cheat on their wives all the time) poison such wives? Sauron, change your by-line; it isn't borne out by your posts. |
Isaiah 40:22 - "It is HE that sitteth upon the CIRCLE of the Earth. . . " Case closed. |
Must reason and faith be mutually exclusive? Must creation and evolution be mutually exclusive? Can a creator not ignite an evolutionary process? Does the Cosmological Argument not demonstrate that there must perforce be a first cause, or unmoved mover? Can we not posess a faith grounded in both reason and deep personal intuition? Do we need a Bible or a Quoran, or any religion at all? Do we not have faculties embedded within us by the Creator which can lead us aright, Jesus regardless, and Mohammad regardless? |
ccollins: i do not doubt that his teachings of love are the way to God. I doubt that he is God. Two different things. |
Analytical:Nezan/ Analytical/ Modupe - No insult intended, but it seems to me that you guys are not being deep or exhaustive enough in your reading of Bible verses. Jesus himself explained the term "I and my Father are one" severally. He stated unequivocally that he and his father were one in the same way as we should be one with him. Now are you Jesus? No. But you are one with him in spirit as a christian, yes? Thus the oneness was a oneness of accord, and not an ontological or existential oneness as an entity. This verse elucidates and proves the point: John 17:20-23: “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: I in them and you in me. May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.” Its abundantly clear that its a spiritual and not ontological or existential oneness. There. That's Bible proof. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 (of 809 pages)

