Emusan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emusan's Profile › Emusan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 (of 400 pages)
herlecks:I don't know the essence of this thread if you agree with the above statement. Is the Word of God not God Himself? If the word carries His PERSONALITY, does that mean the Word is less than God Himself? |
xynerise:Be like can death just fall on this fellow make doll enter sharperly ![]() |
Blakjewelry:By not believing He is Son of God and Savior of the world, right? |
capitalzero:Says a person who lack simple comprehension! what is transliteration? what is translation? dindinrin n din robo.The person who slap sense out of your dull head has deleted Google on your phone too. tell your church members and pastors to go buy Bible which contain Yahweh in original place.This doesn't change the fact that using Jehovah in place of Yahweh is still like using Lord. |
Maximus69:They erred because if you're doing correction, you must do it to the core! Claiming to restore God's name in the Bible and went ahead to use the distorted one is of no different from people who use Lord. Funny thing is, the original name of God was replaced by some people simply because THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO BE PRONOUNCING IT WRONGLY/ANYHOW Yet JWs choose to be using Jehovah simply because PEOPLE ARE ALREADY USED TO IT. |
capitalzero:Dumb skull! The point here is, your organization agreed that Yahweh is more accurate than Jehovah, so begin to use Yahweh instead of Jehovah. Stop being hypocrite! Using distorted name Jehovah instead of Yahweh is of no different from people you accused who use Lord. |
capitalzero:Says the person who lack simple comprehension! |
Maximus69:As usual bending the truth...why did you say I'm correct partially if you think I have problem with JWs whereas, my first post didn't even attack JWs rather corrected the person I quoted about what he accused JWs for. In case you skip it this is what the person I quoted said: "The real name of God is never Jehovah rather yahweh, it was Jehovah's witness that originated the name Jehovah, there is difference between aleluya and haleluya"Focus on @underlined... |
Maximus69:I know what they mean! In the Hebrew~Aramaic scripture[Old Testament] the divine name was replaced with the title 'LORD' as all the alphabets are written in capital letters, the translators of KJV only make use of the name Jehovah where the message could sound odd. For example at Exodus 6:2,3 and Psalms 83:18 there it was clear that a REAL name must suffice for the scripture to sound meaningful!Now if restoring the name in the rightful position is important, didn't the most accurate name be used? What is the difference between people who replace the name with Lord and person who used distorted name? If JWs agreed that Yahweh is closer to the original form than Jehovah! My point then is, since JWs claim to restore the original name they should have used the one close to the original form rather than using the one not too close just because PEOPLE ARE ALREADY USED TO IT. Get that into your skull! |
capitalzero:Then did you know the reason why I brought JWs into this based on the person I quoted? You see you people just want to argue for the argument sake. kjv uses Jehovah, and Jehovah witnesses also use Jehovah in NWT. are Jehovah witnesses first to use Jehovah? are Jehovah witnesses translators of kjv?Did I accuse JWs of using the name Jehovah or accuse them of inserting it into their translation? try to learn more about linguistic and understand transliteration as different from translation. try to compare rendering of Jehovah/Yahweh in Hebrew,Latin and Aramaic.Try to apply for English comprehensive school! JWs themselves admitted that the rendering of Yahweh is more accurate than Jehovah but they only use Jehovah because PEOPLE ARE ALREADY USED TO IT. Now try to understand where my point is coming from... |
Maximus69:That's the problem firstly, I didn't talk about why JWs used the name Jehovah or accuse them of using the name when it's not to have appeared in the Bible. The he has right to show me other versions that used it. Secondly, my point was centered on two different things: Less accurate and most accurate! you people should learn how to comprehend first before posting. Lastly, two of you should go back to my post and read it slowly to see that bringing KJV into this is irrelevant. |
Maximus69:Now I'm partially right, yet you didn't bring out my other wrong info. Jehovah's Witnesses ADOPTED the divine name JEHOVAH for just one reason!Like I usually say, you people only read and don't comprehend. This is because your people behave like a robot just to type anything whenever the name JWs appear to defend it. We're talking about rendering that close to the original form, yet you are saying another thing. If JWs had not claim to come and restore THE ORIGINAL NAME OF GOD in the Bible, that won't be an issue but claiming to come to restore original name of God, also knowing full well that Jehovah isn't close to the original form and went ahead to ADOPT it just because people are already used to it. It's the most ridiculous part of it! |
capitalzero:Read my post again, this time slowly to see that bringing KJV into this is of no necessary. |
capitalzero:Read my post again, this time slowly! |
kellytuns:You're wrong! Both Jehovah and YAHWEH are rendering of the Hebrew word for God...Just that Yahweh is closer to the Hebrew word than Jehovah. Jehovah witness only erred by claiming to come to restore the original name of God in the scripture only to have chosen Jehovah which is not too accurate instead of Yahweh. |
Glory be to the most high... |
Maximus69: Meanwhile i only helped you to enlighten Jessicah who can't grasp the concept of your TRINITY God. So instead of getting annoyed, why not correct me if there's a misconception in my post regarding your TRINITY God! I don't need your input on TRINITY because i too attended churches for over three decades and i have heard a so many contradicting doctrines from Trinitarians themselves.Liar If not because your stupidity is as high as heaven...you wouldn't have contradicted yourself in less than two posts. As usual after your demonic doctrines have been exposed, the next thing you people do is to be bringing up irrelevance topic just to divert attention from the subject matter. |
Maximus69:You don't need my input yet you want us to discuss Trinity, your stupidity is like ZEE world very extraordinary everyday. |
Maximus69:Idiot, me getting annoyed because of who, you See the way you're using style to deviate from the subject matter. SMH If you want my input about Trinity, I'll advice you create another thread and invite me. |
Jessicha:Which issue? Admit I'm wrong and move on....waooo brilliant JWs |
AZeD1:Just see the way you're disgracing your intellect online, well only if you have one sha. Church service...so who are the people known to be holding CHURCH SERVICE? Muslim Hinduism Judaism Sango worshipper There are lots of Christian denominations that don't celebrate EASTER.This is not the point here! |
hardeytarhyour:They way you people lack simple comprehension is very alarming. The bombs occurred in an Hotel and CHURCH...and it's very clear from Obama and Hillary Clinton messages that they distinguished these two places. Obama used....."TOURISTS and EASTER WORSHIPPERS" Hillary Clinton used....."TRAVELLERS and EASTER WORSHIPPERS" Does the bomb occur where the Juddihst gathered? |
AZeD1:I can then ask you, are they EASTER WORSHIPPERS too? There are lots of churches in the west who hire instrumentalist on Sundays(they are not Christians).But they are present on a Christian gathering....why does common sense so far from you? On special days(Christmas, New year, Easter) lots of non Christians attend church either by way of following families or in Nigeria for the goodies that would follow after the service.But where does this people find? The answer is a Christian gathering! Common sense should tell you that not every body in a church is a Christian.But your own common sense tells you that everyone in the church whether they are true Christian or not are now "EASTER WORSHIPPERS" If common sense didn't fail you, Obama and Hillary Clinton used the word "WORSHIPPERS" Do you agree with them that all the people in that church are all EASTER WORSHIPPERS? |
Maximus69:Baby JWs go and join the devoted one and stop being useless online... Na your own mouth talk am say...devoted JWs don't argue online, yet you and your brothers are everywhere on NL |
AZeD1:I don't know why some of you will just be arguing for argument sake... It's clear that Obama and Hillary Clinton mentioned two different group on their twitters Obama said....."Tourists and EASTER WORSHIPPERS" Clinton said...."Travellers and EASTER WORSHIPPERS" And if you noticed what people pointed out is calling those affected inside the church EASTER WORSHIPPERS and not Christians. |
Jessicha:Typical JWs... Hypocrisy will not kill you one day... Madam sense I hear you |
I remember when you first join this thread, you sound so liberal, you even cautioned your fellow JWs and advice people not to be too emotional. But here you are today typical JWs that's why Jws and hypocrite are like 5&6, so you can easily revert back to your vomit or what you preach to people not to do. Maximus69:So you too can go emotional like other yet you agree you know Jesus more than anyone else. Of course any right thinking person will get annoyed at such idiotic miscreant!So your brothers who you're cautioning then they are not right thinking person. Bravo! Even Jesus only claims to be master over the faith of his own followers NOT those who never accepted his interpretation of the scriptures!So Jesus isn't a master over liars, deceivers, hypocrites and false teachers? So i'm pained that a creature supposedly meant to be in the likeness of God could assume he is Master over the faith of fellow creatures like himself yet he admitted he is not the Christ but one out of billions of Bible readers meditating on the practical applications of the Scriptures!Show me where I said I'm a master over Another person FAITH? Undoubtedly you're unquestionably stupid and it's really annoying Sir!Now, you're going emotional, will you apologize to me as you did with @acholadey Hypocrite pretending to be liberal, so you can go into a furious range of anger when someone's view doesn't align with your.
|
Maximus69:And this "ANY OTHER PERSON" includes JWs....very nice! But thinking you're a MASTERe pain am Well keep dreaming, there is no crime in self inflicted madness!So it hits you real hard like this.... |
TATIME:Before your master Don't think anyone cares about what you think about us,Idiotic, you don't care yet you and your brothers keep spamming my mention up and down. so far we're still entering houses and making disciples daily for our Lord oh sorry GB.That's your Own Cup of tea And den no born you well to disturb our ministry because there is FREEDOM of SPEECH, EXPRESSION and WORSHIPSo it pains you reach this level... So TATIME is just a nonentity like his GB |
TATIME:ok But coming on social media to set standards for people based on your own interpretation of the scriptures is Fa ~ Fa ~ Fa ~ Foul!Can you show me where I set a standard for people based on my interpretation on this thread or any ![]() It's evident that you people always make claim without a proof.... Now, is that how a suppose born again Christian's life should be? Just drop your own comment and waka pass, anybody can claim he/she knows all so why must people agree with your idea?Then must you do the same? TATIME you're a hopeless, idiotic miscreant Sir, your logic doesn't count! |
Janosky:The cry of a sore loser...when they couldn't defend their lies anymore. |
TATIME:Waoooo very wonderful, so JWs also interpreted the scripture to suit their own thoughts... I know out of foolishness you will try to remove your organization now from "DIVERS RELIGIOUS GROUPS" |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 (of 400 pages)






