₦airaland Forum

very interesting! I love this...keep it coming!!

.com came across a rather interesting video of a man of God who claims that paying and receiving tithe is a sin before God.

In the long video which surfaced on social media, Chris Ojigbani who is the senior pastor of Covenant Singles and Married Ministries addressed topics such as; definition of tithe, types of tithe, why it is a sin to pay tithe among others.

Speaking on why it is a sin to pay tithes, he backed his teachings up with several Bible passages saying that the holy book gave specific instructions on the group of people who should pay tithes.

He said; “When God gave the commandment of tithe, He clearly stated who would pay the tithe; who would receive the tithe; and the purpose for receiving the tithe. He said the tithe would be paid by Israelites (except those from the tribe of Levi). He said that only the Levites were permitted to receive tithe and also said it was for their service in the tabernacle of the congregation. God actually gave them the tithe as an inheritance.

For you to be eligible to pay tithe, you have to come from any of the tribes of Israel, apart from the tribe of Levi."



Popular Chris Ojigbani

In conclusion of his long teaching, Pastor Chris admonished all Christians never to pay their tithes again; else, they will incur the wrath of God. To men of God like him, he pleaded with them not to receive their member’s tithes again.

In his words; “If you are a man of God, please do not receive tithe again so that you don’t incur the wrath of God. You can receive the regular offering, partnership offering, sacrificial offering, but not tithe.”

*Copied *
I hope to post something on TITHE soon for further enlightenment.

Demogorgon:
Romance, Celebrities, Science and Technology

good...and once again...welcome

welcome to you ... which section will you really be active at? that will help us know your ability and therefore increase your fan base!

d33types:
Which typo??

Your or you are
Am or I am

The 2 words 90% of Nigerians will fail to use properly

gaskiya na error in typing I make!
and yes I'm very aware most Nigerians make that mistake using "am" in place of "I'm"

d33types:
You try sha.apart from the bomb Nigerians are known for

oga that one na typos o! no fes!

thunderbabs:
I believe the puppy sucks from the bottle, not drink from it

you're correct too bro...that's added information!

GreenMavro:
My gf left a note on the fridge: this is not working, im going to my mom's house. I opened the fridge's door, the light came on,the juice was cold. What the hell did she mean?

hehehehehe...she's now a REBEL! militant against you!!

golor:
Please i seriously need answers to this question.

Please how do I stop my from student lusting over me!!I happened to be the only corp member in my school ,often time most of the student girls precisely usually do some crazy stuff in fact funny rather .

I am one person who believe in diligence to the core , at first I was very strict to them cause I sensed something of this nature will emerge , when they started complaining of my strictness I had to free my self a bit but guess what funny behaviours ...

One in SS1 the biggest always looking in fact countless eye contact then she will smile ...

J.s 3 one brought hand to shake me I declined but unfortunatly a teacher saw the scenario and then said, you have to be careful with this student they are something else..

S.s 3 the worst , so many funny behavior, I do take them lesson , if I want to leave ,they will be like are you going sir bye bye take care .

I asked them to submit their lesson note for an assignment given , could you believe that one of the student ,wrote what is liguid milk and she answered liquid milk is a sperm found in condom . the second question she asked is what is Bleep room and she answered Bleep room is where Bleep activities are being done ......she wrote it where I can easily set my eyes on ....

One saw me at my street junction and asked sir is this where you stay I answered yea genuinely only for she to ask what number that she wants to come visit then I told her no need cause I don't welcome such ..

Lastly , I was having class with them ss3 so while writing on the board they started discussing this sir is cute bla bla bla , I pretended I didn't hear them ...

I am one person who believe in diligence in discharging my duties , to make matter worse I am dating , I don't even think of cheating , when I was in school one of my colleagues openly told me to bleep her but I refuse cause I promised my babe faithfulness, I rather masturbate than cheat ...


Please this is not to blow my wristle but to seek a mature way to handle this kid ....

I am thinking of writing the school for retainment immediately after service so I won't stay idle a day after service , why I hunt for a good job from there .....

Please profound solution

hmmmm..
I had the same situation during my service year and I'm happy I scaled through ...you can too but you have to be very tactical ...these girls don't get easily put off but be very firm and honest with them. avoid falling into one on one situation with them, and no matter how subtile they plant seeds of seductive words into you just pretend you don't hear it. politely but firmly decline any visits whether social or educational. teach the lessons in large groups and try to involve another teacher from the school along with you.
don't go telling the teachers or principal that will lead them to intensify the seduction.
given a month or two you will find the interest has waned significantly... or they'll have found someone else to seduce...
be firm but smart.
.

mmluv4real:
My mum is still fighting with the stage 4, kindly join in prayer. Thanks

may the Lord heal her and provide support Amen

UbanmeUdie:





Breast cancer is a curse and any woman whose breeze have been removed because of it for survival, is most unfortunate.

Mammectomy should not be the way out of fighting breast cancer.

A woman with no breast is not attractive at all.

right, a living woman with one breast isn't attractive
is a dead woman with two breasts attractive to you?
I think you should just give an encouraging opinion rather than what you said.
when you see a sufferer I'm sure you will have a rethink.

Samstyle:
Here are some confusing English Words/Phrases You Probably do Not know. I advise you read this post assiduously and take note of the words below.


1. ALRIGHT

Do you know that the word "alright " is a
wrong word. However, there is no reason for
this, but, its correct form should be "all right".
You should also note that "Already, Almost,
Almighty and Altogether" are correct.


2. THE USE OF "THAT"


The following sentences are wrong


a. I had no idea the house was THAT small.
b. As a pianist he isn't really THAT good.

This use of "THAT" is wrong and is to be avoided. The correct form of the above
sentences are:

a. As a pianist he isn't really as good as that

b. I had no idea that the house was as small as that.

The common expression "that much " and
" that many " should be " as much as" and "as
many as that"



3. ADVERSE TO

You cannot be "averse to" , or " show aversion to". This is because the suffix " to" signifies approach, when the opposite is intended. And as so, you can only be "averse
from" , or show "aversion from" something.



4. TRY AND

When you say " try and " do something, it means you try first, before doing it. Thus, there are two actions involved in the
word " try and ".
" Try to" on the other hand, implies the combined action of trying and doing. Usually the correct expression is " try to",
and when people say "try and " they seldom have the logic meaning in mind.




5. AT ABOUT

When you say

"I shall expect you are about five o'clock."

You are wrong. This is because, "at" applies to " a definite time" . Therefore "at about" is a
confusion of two unlikely, and should be avoided.
The correct sentence should be
" I shall expect you about five o'clock".


6. OUGHT TO

" He ought to, didn't he? " is something we often hear. The correct construction is, " He
ought to, oughtnt't he? Or ought he not? ".




7. CIRCUMSTANCES

" Circumstances " are the events around something. Therefore it is wrong to say " under the circumstances " the correct use
is " in the circumstances ".



Hope this helps you improve your grammatical structure.

To read more click below

http://www.schoolwap.ga/2017/11/confusing-english-wordsphrases-you.html?m=1

thanks for the very educating write up! keep it coming

[quote author=sexy74 post=62281043][/quote]you're welcome Sir.

RareKind:
hahahaaha... Carry my cross for me nah... small

o boy! my cross is of concrete o! I jus dey gasp under am now...but if Simon of Cyrene dey pass I fit tell to helep you....small!

RareKind:
hahahaha... Thank God I no dey suffer alone

yes o...make we dey enjoy the suffering
...together!

RareKind:
July born... No wonder I can't turn a bad guy no matter how hard I try

o boy! we dey de same situation be that o!!

in correct English you say "lap" dogs lap and not lick water or any liquid as long as its in a bowl... but of course if your feeding a puppy with a bottle the puppy then drinks it. funny that most people say "I licked an orange " the correct thing to say is "I ate an orange" there's a lot more....

enjoy yourselves o! happy married life...

N. I. C. E! YNWA

Astronomers have captured images of a new visitor to our solar system - the first known comet or asteroid to visit us from another star.
The Queen's University Belfast scientist, who is part of an international team studying the object, said it "sends a shiver down the spine" to look at it and to think of where it has come from.
Professor Alan Fitzsimmons, from the School of Mathematics and Physics at Queen's, together with colleagues in the UK, USA and Chile, has been tracking it using powerful telescopes across the world.
The fast-moving object, now named A/2017 U1, was initially spotted on October 18 by the Pan-STARRS 1 telescope in Hawaii.
The university said initial data implies it is a small rocky or icy object that may have been drifting through our galaxy for millions or even billions of years, before entering our solar system by chance.
The object flew into the solar system from above, was close to the sun last month, and is now already on its way back out to the stars.
Astronomers believe it was probably thrown out of another star system during a period of planet formation.
The same process is thought to have unfolded 4.5 billion years ago around our own star, when Jupiter and Saturn formed.
Despite suspecting such objects existed and looking out for them over past decades, scientists have never seen such an interstellar visitor until now.
During rapid investigations, Prof. Fitzsimmons's team has now captured images of the unusual object, and obtained data on its possible chemical make-up.
Prof. Fitzsimmons said: "By Wednesday this week it became almost certain this object was alien to our solar system.
"We immediately started studying it that night with the William Herschel Telescope in the Canary Islands, then on Thursday night with the Very Large Telescope in Chile."
He added: "It sends a shiver down the spine to look at this object and think it has come from another star."
Queen's said more information is needed to pin down the exact details of where the visitor came from and what its properties are, but said the object should be visible in powerful telescopes for a few more weeks, allowing scientists to continue their investigations.

Lalas247:
think age 13 is better ..once they get to teenage stage

can't agree more!

peter stands out by a mile! was a force to reckon with!

correct man!! wishing you both more years to love smile and share great things together! cheers!!

oh oh oh ohhhh!! you have woken up a giant in me this weekend! I'm going to dig up the poems and love letters from my archives and read them to her...some date back 1995! choi!
you know, each time I'm unhappy with her behaviour I often go over our old pictures we took during our courtship days and some books we shared ...that helps me feel love even more and helps me forgive her shortcomings!
OP...you sabi something! thanks for this.

Jolonjolo:
LOVE DYNAMICS TODAY
IF THAT LOVE DOES NOT SHOW, THAT LOVE IS NOT SO!

Key thoughts; The rewards of love can never be attained without taking the risk of getting hurt. However never confuse the expression of love with the intensity of love. I believe love is a show business. If a love does not show, that love is not so. Simple as that sounds, a lot of people struggle with the expression of love both in human and divine relationships. Hopefully by reading this article we intend to solve this complex equation permanently.

The first reason why most people in our generation struggle with the expression of love in their relationships is because most of us are descendants of parents who are stoic in disposition. Stoics are people who subscribe to Philosopher Zeno‘s school of thought, that people should be free of passion and unmoved by joy,love and grief. Though our forefathers might not have studied Zeno, their propensity for expressionless relationships was a confirmation of his ideologies. This is especially true in the African and Asian contexts. As a young man moving close to my forties, I do not have any clear memory of my Dad ever hugging my Mum. The implication of growing up in such expressionless homes for the first 18 to 20years of our lives meant that we lost the opportunity of learning how to express love in our first learning environment. Most men still struggle with this foundation today.

The second reason why people struggle with the expression of love in their relationships is because of the globalization of evangelical/puritan Christianity and Islam. It was as if the pioneering missionaries of these global movements equated spirituality with the denial of emotional expression. As these religions gained social acceptance, many people began to pay the high price of emotional denial in other to attain the lofty height of spiritual excellence. Most clergy were even trained never to comment on the emotional side of human beings. Teachings on sexuality were rare, and many adherents of these religions went underground with their emotional nature while these religious institutions lost the vital opportunity of being a defining influence in the emotional lives of the people. We must commend these flourishing religions for the democratization of morality in our society, without which our civilization would have been long extinct. We however must also acknowledge the fact that, the emotional denial generated by the extreme advocacy for morality needs to be addressed by a more engaging and socially relevant generation of clergy who are not afraid to have a say in the emotional struggles of their day.

The third reason why some struggle with the expression of love in their relationship is temperamental in nature. Some temperaments seem to be saddled with a deficit in emotional expression. For example, phlegmatics and melancholies compared to sanguines and cholerics who are expressive and buoyant by nature. This is not to say that the first two temperaments do not feel love deeply, they simply do not have as much competence in expression as the other two temperaments. This enabled me coin the term “feelers” and “expressers” in my research on the subject about a decade ago. Feelers to me, are people who have greater depth of feelings than they are able to express,while expressers are people who have greater competence in expression than they actually do feel. The two fold implication of this understanding is that every lover must find out if your partner is a feeler or an expresser. Then with patience and understanding help your partner develop the strengths necessary in their predominant area of weakness,in a non judgmental atmosphere.

The final reason why many lovers struggle with the expression of emotional love is due to past hurts of people who took their love for granted. Almost every lover has had the experience of someone taking your revealed feelings for granted. Most lovers leave such painful circumstances with a vow never to be hurt again. Many therefore will rather conceal their love for another, than risk getting hurt again. The truth however is that the rewards of love can never be attained without taking the risks of getting hurt. On this I agree with Eddie L. Long when he defined love as giving another person the power to hurt you but trusting them not to do so. Sometime in future we shall address the subject of risk management in love. It is however crucial not to confuse the expression of love with the intensity of love. The heart is deceitful above all things,and desperately wicked: who can know it. There are certain wicked individuals who derive pleasure from leading people on emotionally for the fun of it. Others do so, in other to get back at someone else who hurt them in their past. This is why you must prove all things emotional and only hold fast to that which you have proven to be true.

That said, every lover must understand that demonstrating open love for your partner is a fundamental lover’s right. If you can’t show them you really love them,it is best you leave them alone. All emotionally stingy lovers must prepare their heart to loose their partner once a more benevolent lover shows up in their partner’s life.
Finally we must understand that there should be responsible limits of expression in love for unmarried couples. For example, sexual expression is best reserved for the depth of marital union, if you won’t get used and hurt. There is no better way to end this article than the way we started it. Love is show business,if the love does not show that love is not so.

THE GREATEST IS LOVE!!!
Deji Olabode
LOVE DYNAMICS GLOBAL .
ENTHRONEMENT ASSEMBLY LAGOS.
lovedynamix@gmail.com

my guy you have really done some good research into this!
suffice to say, all one needs is some therapy to disengage from the weakness that doesn't allow full fledged expression of one's true feeling of love.
kudos, we learn daily.