Martinez19 Why am I being mentioned here ? Not like if I explain even in the simplest way you'll understand I mean you are an atheist . You are not expected to make sense or elicit reasonable thoughts . Wallow in the usual mediocrity and shallowness mbok .

Bia , take your time .

4kings:
Happy happy happy happy happy happy happy happy happy happy Birthday to CAPSLOCKED
Anything for us?
Cc: Hahn Johnnydon22 KingEbukasBlog Cloudgoddess Weah96 dalaman Hopefullandlord CltrAltDelicious JackBizzle raphieMontella 1Sharon Uyilredia Adepeter2027 et al

Happy Birthday Capslocked ! Best wishes

MrPresident1:
Where are the watchers

Sir , isn't there a spiritual significance of Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel ? I've been patiently waiting for the thread to grace this section with an explanation.

Well , looks like a watcher is sleeping already !

anssy:


Please shut your mouth, you lack humanity, we should deport you to planet Pluto, you are obviously an alien with a blog

I lack humanity because I saw more evidence that proves atheism has devastating effects on the brain

https://www.nairaland.com/3493419/atheist-very-high-possibility-mental

Its because of atheism that blood-thirsty communists went on a killing spree

GoodMuyis:


He don happen

www.nairaland.com/4209225/nigerian-atheist-carl-maobi-kidnapped/1

I'm glad they took him to the appropriate place .

When we told them that atheism can destroy cognitive faculties they thought we were joking. Now see facts

Interminable and irrelevant arguments to ensue in 3...2..1...

hahn:


Don't worry I will come and visit you this weekend. The last time they didn't allow me in because they said you were praying. A sign that your condition was worsening

Atheism + madness + illiteracy + ignorance = disaster

Prayer according to studies improves mental health and general well being. Try it sometime .It should improve yours

hahn:


Did Jesus Christ exist?

Anyone claiming Jesus is actually real is just plain delusional and intellectually honest. Traits which are the very essence of yourself

Anyone who still thinks this way deserves a room with the nutjobs at Yaba left

hahn:


You don dey get sense small small but expecting a fictional dead jew to be concerned about anything is still tallying along the lines of delusion

Honestly , a person who still calls Christ fictional in 2017 is very uneducated

michlins:
defend him bro. What else have you as a sheeple. Like I said, it's not easy scamming people especially flaunting the proceeds on their faces and they defend you with their blood

Shitty logic .


How is wearing an expensive piece an evidence that he scams people ?

That means if he indeed scams people , wearing cheap clothes would force you to conclude that he does not scam people ?

nkemdi89:

I live and work in a male dominated environment, come and see envy and unhealthy competition among the male folks, even to the extent that they celebrate to the demise of their fellow colleagues, no conscience at all, none of them ever wish each other well, as among the few female initially I was portraying "mother Theresa" nature, but when jungle mature nobody teach me wetin be " every aboki to his kettle" .

I've gone through this thread to the point that I'm convinced that you women are missing the point . The unhealthy competition and envy in the male-dominated area have little or nothing to do with the fellow competitors being male or for the sake of them being males , its just because of the masculine nature to show aggression and seek power and authority . But for females it has so much to do with the gender, just being feminine.

A female having another female as a rival quickly incites jealousy and hatred but it's rarely the case if the rival is a male . A man will always have a wont for the pursuit of power and authority regardless of the gender of his rival - and the competition for this power and authority can be healthy or unhealthy regardless of the gender if a man is involved .

tintingz:
Pure magical tricks.

The bees are trained, it's called Hymenoptera training, bees and wasps are intelligent, they use odour and other stuffs to train them.

Hymenoptera training:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hymenoptera_training

Saying this to be supernatural things is lame, only rural and semi-developed area with backward people will believe this to be juju.

Here's civilized developed country training bees to detect drugs.

Honey bees trained to detect illegal drugs
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33195468/honey-bees-trained-to-detect-illegal-drugs

It's not a new thing here and not supernatural.

You look desperate . He 'stole' music items and not drugs . And what does a local/native doctor know about using bees to fish out thieves . A more rational explanation is that the people involved planned this to happen . The 'victim' , the owner of the stolen item and the native doctor are all participants in the game .

superhumanist:
For those too lazy to click the link, here is a simple comment I saw on a forum that destroys Plantinga's EAAN-


"The first problem is that beliefs are not inherited traits. Natural selection may well favour individuals whose beliefs lead them to greater reproductive success, and these beliefs may well be passed down culturally to their offspring, but the theory of evolution has nothing to do with this. Prof Plantinga clearly has no idea about the theory of evolution.

The second obvious problem is that the EEAN is that it is based on a dualistic notion that beliefs have a neurophysiological structure and associated semantic content. The example of a hominoid running away from a tiger whilst thinking he is trying to pet it shows how Prof Plantinga thinks about how the mind works. However, the modern way in which the brain is thought to work is that part of the brain controls our flight from a danger, such as tiger, with no semantic content whatsoever whilst a separate part of the brain is responsible for language and the semantic content of thinking. Creatures with no areas of the brain capable of language still have a part of the brain capable of recognizing and fleeing from danger, but will have no beliefs about this. Humans have inherited these brain structures, but have an additional part of the brain capable of forming semantic content and beliefs, but which are not inheritable. Prof Plantinga clearly has no idea of theories of how the brain works."
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/31401/what-are-the-problems-with-plantingas-evolutionary-argument-against-naturalism

So this is where you copied the rebuttal from. No wonder you couldn't defend it because the author of the post was not even elaborate enough .

superhumanist:



Everyone is seeing you for the troll you are.


If anyone is interested in thorough rebuttals of alvin platinga's naturalism argument (EAAN) here is a good link-

http://rationallyspeaking..com.ng/2013/07/plantingas-evolutionary-argument.html

Why is this fellow very unintelligent? Can you provide a cogent defence of Massimo's rebuttal of the argument ? Or you just assumed that the rebuttal actually defeats the argument ?

How many times are we going to explain what that verse is actually talking about and not moral evil was we know it .

And , when will atheists realize that if they believe morality is subjective then murder , rape , poverty , disasters, sickness are subjectively good to another person . An atheist cannot judge another by his own moral standards if believes that morality is subjective .

The problems have persisted because most atheists especially on this site are either very ignorant of this or lack the intelligence to comprehend the responses .

plaetton:


And what were those scientific agricultural methods?

Making sacrifices and waiting for the seasonal flooding of the Nile ?
Get serious.

They did both and that's the point .

But let's not digress too much from the crux of the matter . I wanted to cut the chase and end it once and for all but where's the fun in that? A slow and painful end is much fun .

In the 1800s during the godless revolutions in Europe which involved the ousting of religious monarchs , atheism was on the rise and suicide seemed concomitant and according to researches , atheism was culpable for the rise in the number of suicide cases . Should we conclude that atheism is a false belief since it hindered the survival of those people ?

Remember , atheism is tied to nihilism which induces the impulse to destroy and views life as purpose , meaningless, irrational, purposeless which in many cases lead to suicide.

plaetton:

And where is ancient Egypt with their robust agricultural outputs today ?

Totally irrelevant sir . The fact is that Ancient Egypt had both their worship of Osiris and scientific agricultural methods(they were even more innovative as time progressed ) - this proves the dichotomy you presented is a false one .

analize701:

lolzzzzzzz. He challenged you to open a thread and trash his nonsense, instead of doing that, you are now talking about him in the third person in his presence. Wow.

Just take the bait already.

My dear, na their way . He won't take it of course because the ministry of atheism founded on lies and ignorance must move forward .

KingEbukasBlog:
cc : lalasticlala

Happy Sunday

Ranchhoddas:
Masterfully put.

You niggas need to stop asslicking plaetton for his flowery language . There is no evidence to support his claims(Its more like what he tells himself everyday when he wakes up from sleep ) and pantheism does not deny that the universe has a creator . It just says the totality of everything , "pan" , is God and this may or may not include the creator of the universe .

plaetton:


False.
And we can easily test that.

You can make sacrifices to your god, and let me use scientific agricultural methods, and let us see who produces surplus and better crops.

There is a good reason why despite using a greater percentage of our lands for agriculture, we still do not produce enough to make food abundant and cheap, compared to smaller countries that we import food products from.

False Dichotomy - which is a fallacy . Its not either god or scientific agricultural methods . The third option is to have both gods and scientific agricultural methods .

Example
The ancient Egyptians worshipped the god Osiris who was associated with the River Nile and the fertility of the land. Yet , they developed irrigation systems like the basin irrigation and other different forms of agriculture like horticulture for their gardens .

Anyone with a good knowledge of history of the Egyptians can attest to the abundance and robustness of agricultural outputs from ancient Egypt .

superhumanist:



The same Platinga's argument that has been rebutted endlessly.

keep trolling with your alternate self. Kingebukasblog

Lol . Atheist tactic is to claim the argument has been rebutted endlessly while what we have are strawman and other fallacious rebuttals littered everywhere .

plaetton:


Well if you believe , for example, that skydaddy is the only thing responsible for blessing believers with good harvest, then you would likely remain ignorant of good farming practices, and those that believe in biology and scientific methods for agriculture would most likely have more robust agricultural outputs, and mostly likely to survive than you and your clan of false believers.

Nigeria is a very good example.

There are cultures in Nigeria and abroad who believed supernatural beings were responsible for the propitious times of sowing and harvest and still had good farming practices and robust agricultural outputs . Are you denying this ? Since they have good farming practices and robust agricultural outputs , does this validate their belief that supernatural beings were responsible for propitious times of sowing and harvest ?

butterflyl1on:


I have been very busy lately so have no post or comment to waste on anyone who fails to understand what platinga said and would simply just type without proof of his brilliant analysis being flaws.

That guy is one of those whom my posts for now would not be wasted on.

Thank God you didn't even comment sir . It would have been indeed a complete waste of time . He's a complete joke .

superhumanist:


I now know that you are mentally imbalanced. If you want a civil debate, then address the flaws that I pointed out in Platinga's argument.

After all, the flaws can be found on any philosophy site or forum dealing with the argument.

the ball is in your court. Keep in mind that you are the one looking foolish here because you havent done research on the matte.

What is wrong with this fellow ?

Mister , you have to prove these are indeed flaws before I'll go ahead to refute them . Its becoming obvious you lack an understanding of the quote made by Plantinga .

Superhumanist , the copy and paste atheist who purports himself as a deist but has the beliefs of a pantheist . You claim the universe is God but does not understand that if the universe has an intrinsic conscious creative and divine force then the goal of natural selection wouldn't just be survival because the divine would logically be interested in the realization of truths one of which would be that within it is a conscious creative force orchestrating the formation or development of natural/material objects .

Please take urahara's place as the forum's ...

superhumanist:


How foolish. Why should I respond to your foolish accusation?

I pointed out simple flaws in Platinga's argument. You called it a strawman. Why the hell should I bother with your inability to comprehend?

You have to prove these are actually flaws in the argument and I'm waiting for you to prove they are indeed flaws in the argument . But you've been throwing tantrums since then and I've been calm enough to direct the puerility back at you .

superhumanist:



Defend the pitfalls from what? Your ridiculous statement that I threw straw men?

Then show me why it isn't a strawman and respond to my questions impugning these "pitfalls" you discovered .

superhumanist:



But the fact is that you act like a foolish troll.

And you are an unintelligent person which is a fact .

You have a special way of ignoring points that rebut your arguments.

Right there , you made claims that you were not able to defend . Joke's on you

superhumanist:


Research is now copy and paste eh?

I laugh. As if Platinga's argument is infallible.

My problem is not actually with the source of your rebuttal but with your inability to defend the so-called pitfalls you discovered . It shows you just regurgitated whatever you saw there and this bespeaks of your vacuity .

superhumanist:


Going by this thread, many here think that you are a fool.

They are neither intelligent nor people I hold in high esteem , so their opinions are very irrelevant . Including yours of course like I previously stated .

superhumanist:


What kind of trolling question is this?

Numerous examples have been given in many philosophy forums on this argument.

For example, if you have the belief that tigers are cuddly, you will surelymeet your doom if you act on that belief.


Please do some research

Like I expected , the "rebuttal" was obviously copied from some atheist website that's why you weren't able to defend it and had to tell me to do my own research .