₦airaland Forum

Kudos. However, your submissions are a bit contradictory and the reason isn't farfetched; you lump the ones whose self-esteem are rooted in weak self-sufficiency with those whose self-esteem are rooted in strong self-sufficiency. The former are toxicity personification (the wannabe feminists), while the latter are harmlessness and harmoniousness personification (strong-minded women).

Independent - emancipated - women whose self-esteem are rooted in weak self-sufficiency are akin to beta men. They're perfect definition of small-mindedness. Only men who're subjugable or ready to self-slave can put up with them. Nothing gives them more pleasure than when they humiliate their men, especially in public, just to give impression that they're in control. And it's always about them - self and self-interest - conscientiousness isn't in their life dictionary. To them impoliteness in particular and vices in general are signs of power and strength, respectively. They tend to mistake people of goodness for weaklings - their inability to differentiate goodness from servility is always their undoing - I don't hold brief for servile men (people).

Meanwhile, independent - emancipated - women whose self-esteem are rooted in strong self-sufficiency are blissfulness and blessings to good men in particular and good people in general. They're perfect definitions of aristocracy and virtuousness. As strong-minded as they're, yet, they're always conscientious, it's not always about them - they aren't usually preoccupied with self and self-interest - but about what's right at any point in time. They know that politeness in particular and goodness in general aren't signs of weakness but that of dignity and strength, respectively. This class of women, when they choose to identify with feminism, they give it a pleasurable taste to savour by all sane and sound people irrespective of one's perspective towards the movement.

Only a petty man (person) will expect/demand for submission in its formalness - submissiveness is good and expected, and those who expect it knows that it is earned not given - from a woman (person) outside formal settings (work environment where totalitarian rather than civility is required to achieve efficiency). Yes, there's a distinction/difference between submissiveness and submission - euphemism. The importance of euphemism can never be overemphasized. Show me a proponent of submission and I will point to you a subjugator. Unfortunately, subjugation knows no gender.

Mutual healthy and happy union only take place where both parties involved are liberators (not where one of the parties is a subjugator) - liberalism doesn't mean absence of conscientiousness.

Sincerity begets submissiveness. A sincere head doesn't need immunity to reign supreme towards his follower(s), however, an insincere head can only reign supreme towards his follower(s) if and only he has immunity, this is so because he's full of impunity - so, an insincere head will expect submission rather than submissiveness from his follower. The former in this regard is a leader - leaders liberate - while the latter is a dictator - dictators subjugate. Those of the diplomatic ethical leanings liberate, while those of the manipulative ethical leanings subjugate.

You're seeing her action from the surface while negating its root cause. Literally, she has no anger issue, so to say. She's a cynic. The truth is that behind any cynic is a hypocrisy personified - unless you've given her justifiable reason(s) before that you're an untrustworthy person.

Genuflection shouldn't be mistaken for politeness. Its more an act of superficiality/servility rather than an act of realness - it doesn't connotes goodness. Most people who genuflects are usually hypocrisy personifies. So, if she's truly a conscientious woman, more blessings to her.

The truth is that academic success in particular and life success in general don't change anyone, they only makes conspicuous the good, bad or vice one is made of.

You're not just an articulate incompetent, but also a feeble-minded and mentally parochial entity.

Well, maybe you're simply seeking attention, with an ulterior aim to undignify the person whose photo you put up there.

@OP

It's obvious that you don't know what shyness is - shyness isn't the same thing as reservedness. There's nothing good about it, because it's a product of timidity. Show me a shy person and I'll point to you a local champion - oppressor personified, dove-like outside but lion-like at home. Shy people tends to be hypocritically disingenuous, don't mistake their open servile attitudes for goodness, because they're full of vices.

The traits you highlighted are hallmarks of reserved women. Reserved women (people) and goodness are inseparable. . . but take their goodness for granted at your own peril.

blazesam:
MEANING?

Not you bro. I referred to the person with "sandra50" moniker.

The information you uploaded on your DP section isn't true.

It's conventional wisdom that prevention is better than cure. So, there's is no wisdom in getting involved with a petty person in the first place since you can easily avoid same and avoid being betrayed or used in the long run.

To be on the safe side, flee from any hypocritically disingenuous person - if you're sane and sound, you'll notice the presence of this vice of an attribute in someone within 1-3 time meeting - because behind any hypocritically disingenuous person is a perpetual liar and/or self-centered and greedy person. It takes a greedy and/or self-centered person to cheat.

Sofrosh:
I had a dream yesterday, that the final of the ongoing FIFA WORLD CUP will be PORTUGAL VS MEXICO. But I don't know who will come out triumphant.

You no wan give credit to the source abi!

There's a tiny line between the actions of an unassuming, kind, loyal and selfless woman (person) and a desperate one. Mistake the former for the latter at your own peril; that a woman offers you the best of herself doesn't automatically mean that she's desperate. There's no healthy relationship without mutual self-sacrifices.

Since the axiom which says that "prevention is better than cure" still remains potent, I wonder why one would aim for heartbreak when s/he can easily prevent it. The ways to prevent heartbreak are:

- Firstly, ensure that you have achieved self-realization before entertaining the thought of going into a romantic relationship.

- Having achieved self-realization, do yourself a favor by adopting diplomatic ethical leanings - I know it's hard to operate on the offensive side of life rather than the defensive side of life - by so doing, you will become a proponent and practitioner of the axiom "he who comes into equity must come with clean hands."

- Now, as a good and no-nonsense person, you can enter into the game.

In the field of the game, always remind yourself that s/he who isn't greedy and/or gullible can never be used and deceived - only the used and deceived (not the one who love the most as many usually and erroneously assert) always gets heartbroken. This is so important because many do see a burning fire and still walk into it thinking that they can roll inside the raging fire without gotten burnt. So, when you see a raging fire - nothing can ever prevent a sane and sound person from not seeing a raging fire, if not from afar but when closer to it - forget about giving it a trial, because the chances of you coming out harmless even on trial level is less than 1%.

However, if your detection mechanism failed you and you found yourself involved before realizing that you're dealing with a frenemy, don't condone his/her pettiness instead walk out with alacrity - in this scenario you won't still experience heartbreak instead you will feel disappointed.

I write based on experience because I haven't experienced heartbreak in a romantic relationship before, even though I've been privileged to be in the game for too long. The only way I can experience heartbreak in a romantic relationship is peradventure a virtuous woman I'm/I get involved with die in the cause of the relationship - but I know that nature will not allow such to happen untimely.

One of the best feelings one can ever experienced is the feeling of walking out of a failed relationship knowing that you gave in your very best yet without losing anything - this happens when your good deeds towards the other party are done altruistically and volitionally.

I believe that there's a sole creator of the universe - what to call him is an individual/group choice. I understand that he's just and doesn't interfere in human beings minute affairs, because all that human beings need to exist independent of his minute intervention he has already provided. And that the presence of subconscious makes every human being a spiritual entity.

Also, I understand that he neither needs our praise nor worship, and the simple way to reverence him is by being conscientious towards fellow human beings. Meanwhile, he neither authored any book nor instructed anyone, at any point in time, to author one on his behalf - this however doesn't take away the ingenuity of the human authors of the conventional "holy books." They're surely written by some of the wisest people of the yore.

Hmm! So long as she isn't a "girlfriend of convenience" to the guy, her assertion is good. Unfortunately, only the guy knows within himself whether she's his girlfriend of convenience or his heartbeat. If she's the former, sorry for her because in the end, and under normal circumstances, the head will agree with the heart and follow it - it's more about achieving inner peace than being unpredictable.

introvertedsoul:
A FACT under PROBABILITY?
Pardon me do you know the exact meanings of fact and probability?
Can you some how, based on mathematical calculation (which i have already provided), tell me what will be Croatia's motivation to risk their best players against the most physical team in the group, all in a bid to win the last game when they are already through? The closest anybody can come to them is 5 points!

Ordinarily I wouldn't have dignify you with a response at this point, but I have to, because you and your ilks are in the habit of mistaking indulgence for weakness and acceptance of defeat.

"Fact under probability" is an oxymoron. Only the competent, wise and discerning, can understand it - just as only people in this same category can understand my foremost submission on this thread. Now vamoose and look for your mates and ilks elsewhere because we aren't operating on the same wavelength.

I wish you all the best.

introvertedsoul:
This game is a must win!
We must win our 2 remaining games to be sure of qualification
Croatia has 6 points they are through
Iceland has one point
Argentina one point
We have no point
If we draw today, be rest assured that Iceland will draw with Croatia will draw with Iceland, European sentiments and politics will come to play, besides they Croatia will rest their starting 11 since they already top the group...... If w draw today.

I wonder how your postulation - which is an assumption - is superior to my submission - which is a fact under probability. Lol.

sexdoll:
as usual

while others are winning swiftly

una own go be to use calculator to calculate una chances and probability.

ndi ara.

no matter how e take happen, nigeria is going out in the first round!!!

yes, na me talk am.

"Ndi ara" you say! Now direct your further mention(s) to your wretched father and lunatic mother. Bumpkin.

anonymuz:
really

Yes.

A win or at worst 2-2 draw over/with Iceland will surely keep our hope alive. Wherein in the latter becomes the case, a Croatia win over Iceland with at least 3 nill, and a win or at least 2-2 draw for us against Argentina will have us qualify from the group. . . Yes, we can qualify with just 2 points in this regard.

The fact that one shouldn't expect doesn't mean that one shouldn't accept or wouldn't experience favour. Experience has shown me that nature never fails those who're altruistic, loyal and beneficent towards others.

In summary, so long as you're conscientious, there'll always be someone that cares for you or someone nature will make available to care in your time of dire need - yet forget expectedness.

There's no perfect relationship between mortals anywhere or anytime - perfection is only of the sole creator of the world. In lieu of it however is a healthy relationship. A healthy relationship can be achieved where both parties involved in a relationship are individually conscientious and exhibits same towards each other at all times. In a healthy relationship neither parties involved is/is expected to be vice/evil nor servile. Mutual goodness sustains a healthy relationship. Love (the big/true love) is variant of goodness.

contigiency:
English and Literature master we don't know please teach us.When you finish, you also help us to interpret this one

"I have been using phone to make calls since 10 years now, but I just realized today that phone calls is real after answering my father's call".

Direct your further mention(s) to your wretched father and lunatic mother. Bumpkin.

Come on people! She was simply metaphoric, I don't want to believe that none of you understand what a metaphor is.

RIP Ras Kimono

They're naturalists. They're common sights on the roads in most parts of Australia.

MissRaine69:
In a nutshell it’s a matter of self worth and confidence?

It's a matter of being conscientious, with special emphasis on self-dominion and maverickness like I posited earlier on.

A pronouncement - just like this one under discussion - doesn't negate rationality. So, it still stand so long as it's within the confines of rationality, only illogical people will disagree to it. Age is just ordinary number, it doesn't matter.

Meanwhile, the reason majority (especially most women) don't indulge in it - marrying men younger than them - is because of lack of self-dominion. It takes one who's self-dominion with some slices of maverickness to live life at the periphery of conventionalism. The world that encourages conformism, and mistakes non-conformism as evil, should be blamed.

@OP

You and the said old man ought to have known that politeness begets dignity, while dignity begets respect, and of course respect is reciprocal.

Don't expect submissiveness from a sane woman (or any sane person) when you undignify yourself. A person that has self-dominion can't be caught rewarding disloyalty with loyalty. So next time don't automatically mistake a woman that has self-dominion, and rightfully exercise same, for a presumptuous one.

The man expected submission (not submissiveness) from her, but unfortunately for him he wasn't in an authoritative position to boss her around. One can only submit to his/her boss or a dictator. It was a case of uncivil/domineering man vs a lady with self-dominion, so it's wrong for you/anyone to use such scenario alone to conclude that she's a presumptuous woman - she may or may not be.

IamaNigerianGuy:
There is everything wrong with outsourcing as practiced in Nigeria.

First it creates a temporary workforce out of the employee pool that has minimal salary, no benefits, no pension and effectively no rights. In addition, it enriches the outsourcing companies to the detriment of the employee. It is bad for society because the wage of the worker is reduced leading to lower taxes, lower purchasing power, and increased liabilities as workers age and retire. Finally it is humiliating as it creates a two-tiered structure of 'permanent' and temporary staff.

The real reasons outsourcing is practiced in Nigeria are because we lack effective government and companies use this loophole to exploit workers. In North America, contract workers are paid higher wages and emoluments than regular workers (eg check the Alberta oil boom) to account for the temporary. Regulated working hours, medical insurance, disability insurance, contributory pension (401k in the USA) etc are a must.
Modern countries with their renaissance after WWII, did not rebuild their economies with temporary outsourced labor.

Companies outsources their non-core areas of practice simply to cut operating cost and to ensure optimum productivity. Term them selfish you'll be right - fortunately that's what business is all about, to provide service and gain from it - but term them opportunists you're wrong, because there's no law that prohibits such anywhere. So literally there's nothing detrimental about such practice (sentiment aside).

In North America, temporary staffing (outsourcing) isn't outlawed. It's a cash cow industry to date.

This isn't his first time of running for the same position. Meanwhile, I've to believe that by now he must have understand that influence rather than popularity is what wins elections.

There's nothing slavery about outsourcing. Actually, its main aim is to enable optimum productivity and to reduce operational cost.

Tiwa has characteristics of a non-conformist. So, don't be surprised to find out, on a closer observation and association with her, that she's more conscientious than her conservative counterparts. Many people tend to mistake non-conformists for unchaste people.

Sad! Well, true love exist. However, don't expect it where there's no altruism and loyalty.