₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,802 members, 8,513,767 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 November 2026 at 01:26 PM

Toggle theme

LordReed's Posts

Nairaland Forum › LordReed's Profile › LordReed's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 (of 1463 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 8:44am On Mar 12, 2024
PoliteActivist:
No mind Reed. See my QED on him above
Dumdum why don't you show the full description of Selection in VISTA and point out where it says nature is making a choice.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 8:42am On Mar 12, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Olodo will not quote from reliable science references but what he wants to hear
I can use same method to prove to use that Buhari is not real but one Jubrin of Sudan
De play
Dumdum science sources don't usually have to deal with dumbarses who think nature has agency or is being controlled by some magical sky being. That's why someone like me needs to break it down to your level and still your blockhead cant take it.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m):
PoliteActivist:
My once-again defeated buddy Reed and his non sequitur questions.
Whatever you think those words mean, neither "anthropomorphic" nor "metaphoric" applies to natural selection, . "Natural selection" is language coined by a person who then went ahead to say what he meant by it!
Once again, Charles Darwin originated the whole evolution and natural selection thing. Be humble you can't define his own coinage better than him, then carefully STUDY his definition of his own term! Study the four screenshots below.

QED (once again!)

(Wow, you've lost every single discussion we've had!)
Aemmyjah:
There is no selection in natural selection
Yes or No
I seem to have a couple of recalcitrant knuckleheads here. Listen dummies, this is very simple. Nature has no agency it cannot take actions but we describe some of its processes as through an action was taken or a behavior was displayed. Eg. We say a moving stream is running, we say the clouds are pregnant, etc. None of things like this are literal. The stream is not actually running the way an animal with legs can, it merely descriptive. So when I say nature doesn't select I mean it is not taking an action or making a choice with an outcome in mind, it can't. But some how you knuckleheads are all over the place with nonsense especially PoliteActivist with their constant appeals that indicate no real attempt at understanding.
Christianity Etc › Re: Women Always Kill Potential Children Of God by LordReed(m): 8:22am On Mar 12, 2024
Dtruthspeaker:
You too suffered abuse so, same to you.
You are projecting sir but that's OK, that's part of trauma response.
Christianity Etc › Re: Women Always Kill Potential Children Of God by LordReed(m): 8:59pm On Mar 11, 2024
Dtruthspeaker:
I call you and many people like you snakes and you like them abused me and other people and you aint my family. So, null.
Sorry man I sympathise. Abuse is no joke.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m):
PoliteActivist:
Charles Darwin originated the whole evolution and natural selection thing. Be humble you can't define his own coinage better than him, then carefully STUDY his definition of his own term!
Dumdum my question was a simple yes or no one. Again, Is the selection in Natural Selection metaphorical or not? Show me how hopeless you are with your answer.

Edit: On review, I have come to see that I have been using the wrong word. I should have been using ANTHROPOMORPHIC not metaphoric.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 10:03pm On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
Na wa o my bros.

Reed, is the word "selection" in the word "nature"??
The two screenshots below may help you
LoLz. Is the selection in Natural Selection metaphorical or not? Show me how hopeless you are with your answer.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 8:12pm On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
I give up. I've tried. I don't know what sort of person this is. Folks please help me explain to my good buddy Reed that "natural selection" is NOT synonymous with "nature". Please help me explain to him that nature is a tangible thing while natural selection is a process that leads to certain traits being SELECTED! Please help me explain to him that his statement "natural selection doesn't select anything" is embarrassing even for an  elementary school biology student!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! You have come again to display your stupidity. What is nature if not a conglomeration of all NATURAL processes and their outcomes? Is NATURAL Selection not a part of nature then? Look at this dummy trying to use semantics to gaslight their way out of admitting they goofed. LMFAO!
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 6:14pm On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
Aemmyjah, please help me tell my good buddy Reed to stop continuation embarrassment of himself. Please let him know that "select" and "selected for" are long established language of natural selection that even elementary school biology students instinctively know what it means. It simply means over time traits that are beneficial to success of a specie predominate.
Even his own screenshot (see below) uses "select"!!
BTW you keep appealing to Aemmyjah that doesn't care a rats arse for Natural Selection nor does he even understand the concept. Are you just so incapable of divorcing yourself from making stupid appeals?
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 6:03pm On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
Reed you sure u ok? How can a thinking human being possibly be like this?? How can it be that of all things to discuss about natural selection your focus is that no individual actually goes about selecting traits!! - something that everyone instinctively knows. That's why I say you are a literalist. Read what Darwin said. That's why he used "it's as if"!
You sure u r all there Reed? I no get the way you reason o
Bwahahahahaha! Who are you trying to gaslight? Where did I say individuals don't select? I said nature doesn't select here you are saying my focus is that no individual actually goes about selecting traits!! You excel in stupidity I swear. LMFAO!

Meanwhile when I first said nature doesn't select you were shitting bricks but now that I bitchslapped your brain you are changing mouth that selection isn't literal. Bwahahahahaha!

Dude I will be here to deliver some more bitchslaps to your brain don't worry.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 5:22pm On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
See exactly what I was saying? So age to you can't be in hours?? SMH
We don't generally talk about age for organisms that don't live up to a year.
Christianity Etc › Re: Women Always Kill Potential Children Of God by LordReed(m): 4:34pm On Mar 10, 2024
Dtruthspeaker:
What is wrong with saying ALWAYS?



Guess is free!
I guess so. Must be hard to have received all that abuse from your own mum. Is that why you called your family snakes? They all are abusive SoBs?
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 4:31pm On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
Aemmyjah, please help me tell my good buddy Reed to stop continuation embarrassment of himself. Please let him know that "select" and "selected for" are long established language of natural selection that even elementary school biology students instinctively know what it means. It simply means over time traits that are beneficial to success of a specie predominate.
Even his own screenshot (see below) uses "select"!!
LMFAO! I swear you are fully stupid. You left where it CLEARLY states NO. TWICE. Only to focus on where again it uses select metaphorically and you want to talk to me about being stuck on literal words.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 4:28pm On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
What does the encircled embarrassing statement (below) mean to you?
Reed, honesty I don't think you are made for this type of discussion. It's as if you find it very difficult to get beyond the literal words to what is actually meant.

(Example: "long enough" in my statement below also implies "healthy enough and competitive enough" to reproduce)
I clearly did NOT write age because I was referring to organisms broadly some of whose reproductive cycles are in hours.
Christianity Etc › Re: Women Always Kill Potential Children Of God by LordReed(m): 1:22pm On Mar 10, 2024
Dtruthspeaker:
I could as well tell you my.house address and tribe.
Well you said ALWAYS so I guess it means your mom abused you or she considered you evil. Which one was it? Same with your wife, better seek help quickly if your wife is abusing your children.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 11:34am On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
My good buddy Reed, it is really a major wonder that you still have mouth to talk despite embarrassing yourself for so many pages on this thread. (See a sample below). Please, what exactly is the point of that your screenshot,?
LoLz. Don't deflect. Natural Selection DOES NOT SELECT. See it in black and white and reset your bitchslapped brain.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 11:33am On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
Must be your wife that wrote this below
Show me where I wrote reproductive AGE.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 11:32am On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
My good buddy Reed, it is really a major wonder that you still have mouth to talk despite embarrassing yourself for so many pages on this thread. (See a sample below). Please, what exactly is the point of that your screenshot,?
What is this one saying? Has my point changed?
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Did Pastor Adeboye Not Foresee The Painful Untimely Death Of The Wigwes by LordReed(m): 10:22am On Mar 10, 2024
Daejumong:
Many have wondered why the revered man of God didn’t see his spiritual son”s imminent untimely death .
The truth is sometimes God speaks through a junior prophet and will not reveal it to a senior prophet. He can speak through subordinates, strangers or unbelievers!
Sometimes He can even speak through a donkey, Numbers 22.
In the case of Herbert Wigwe, he spoke through his PA , Sola Faleye.
In Sola’s words, ‘ sir are you comfortable flying in a chopper at night?’
Herbert replied and said he trusts the navigation system in America.
Would Herbert have said the same thing if it was his spiritual father Pastor Adeboye that raised the concern, he would definitely have cancelled the flight .
God in this case spoke through the PA but Herbert just like many of us do not listen when it comes from the most unlikely of places.
We all will die but it is never the PERFECT will of God for us to die a gruesome untimely death.
Oh God please help us all to know when you are speaking to us especially when it’s coming from places we don’t expect.
Rest in peace Herbert, Doreen and Chizi.
LoLz. Someone that didn't foresee the death of his own son na spiritual son e wan see? Bwahahahahaha!
Christianity Etc › Re: Women Always Kill Potential Children Of God by LordReed(m): 10:18am On Mar 10, 2024
Dtruthspeaker:
Have you noticed that women don't like babies and children that are goodly?

Check it, while the world is screaming "o what an adorable and sweet baby can i carry her: o i wish she was mine: o, i wish i could take her home: o, i could carry this baby all day". the mother is just looking at you like something is wrong with you.

And if you check it, you would see that she wishes she could give you the baby, And if you still check it, you would see that she does not like that particular child.

But check it, check the mothers of all bad and evil children, you would see that their mothers always love them very very much up to the point that she would kill you if you correct or teach or beat her child.
Was your mother abusive towards you? Is your wife abusive to your children?
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 9:55am On Mar 10, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Artificial selection is intentional while natural selection is not
What did you say that means again grin?
Lemme bitchslap your brain some more. Read the screenshot.

PoliteActivist this bitchslap is for you too.

Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 9:38am On Mar 10, 2024
PoliteActivist:
You'd be on your back before you can say "habit" - I'm a black belt in Karate😎

That's exactly my point! (have you lost your mind!) - I've been saying just because an organism reaches reproductive age doesn't mean it automatically reproduces. While you and LordReed have been all about reproductive age!
You sure u ok?
Quote were I wrote reproductive age.
Christianity Etc › Re: How Is It Possible That Anyone Will Not See Anything Wrong With Homosexuality? by LordReed(m): 8:27am On Mar 10, 2024
NNTR:
grin grin grin

grin grin grin

grin grin grin The truth is never popular

Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.
Never say never.
Christianity Etc › Re: How Is It Possible That Anyone Will Not See Anything Wrong With Homosexuality? by LordReed(m): 8:26am On Mar 10, 2024
Lawag3:
I promise it's still on topic. I would have answered your questions immediately but I want to elaborate so I need you to answer those questions.

We're having a discussion.
No sir. Once bitten twice shy.
Christianity Etc › Re: How Is It Possible That Anyone Will Not See Anything Wrong With Homosexuality? by LordReed(m): 7:37am On Mar 10, 2024
Lawag3:
You answer to this questions will form the basis of my answer to your questions

So please answer them
No. This is the game I see you guys like to play, the game of stylishly deflecting to something else instead of the current topic. I no longer play that game. When we have finished with the question then you introduce another topic.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m):
Aemmyjah:
Artificial selection is intentional while natural selection is not
What did you say that means again grin?
It means that natural has no agency, it does not ACT like a person acts so selection there is metaphorical. Let that sink through your thick skull plates.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 12:35am On Mar 10, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Olodo
Na me coin the word Natural selection
Olodo
Bwahahahahaha! Dummy I will make sure I continual bitchslap your brain with knowledge. LoLz.
Christianity Etc › Re: How Is It Possible That Anyone Will Not See Anything Wrong With Homosexuality? by LordReed(m): 12:34am On Mar 10, 2024
Lawag3:
Do you know pan was the Roman and Greek god of nature and sex. His defining feature was he could have sex with any thing a Minotaurs, tree nymphs you name it.

Are pansexuality and bisexuality the same.

How many genders are there?
Dude don't be asking me questions when you haven't answered mine.
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 6:09pm On Mar 09, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Oga
Answer me first
There's no selection in natural selection as you said. Yes or No?
Dumdum nature doesn't take actions, it has no agency. Selection in there is metaphorically so dumbos like you can start to understand. Unfortunately it has the opposite effect.

Are you going to clarify what translation means or are you gonna keep playing ostrich?
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 10:22am On Mar 09, 2024
budaatum:
Science, as in what we learn by using our senses, constantly evolves.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/mar/09/controversial-new-theory-of-gravity-rules-out-need-for-dark-matter
Interesting.
Health › Re: Why Porn Is Ruining The Lives Of Men by LordReed(m): 7:43am On Mar 09, 2024
Draslo:
A man's sexual energy is sacred. It is not a toy. If you are a rabbit and like to Bleep, Bleep women. If you can't afford women or have an STD, you can abstain till when you can afford shit. The rate at which men release when masturbating is a whole lot less energy zapping as when you actually Bleep. This constant but low energy release over a given time is 10 times more release than actually fucking twice a week. Malt and milk cannot reclaim this lost energy. If it did, sportsmen and women would go to competitions with their partners and Bleep like say tomorrow no dey. It's deeper than many people like to go. I no dey fear rabbit hole. I suppose be FBI or CIA agent. 😁 Sports competitions are the only activity that enforces non sexual activity during competitions. E get why! You should research the word self-servicer from the UK. Like the history of the word in football
It just seems like you are decrying porn/masturbation addiction. Any form of addiction is bad, doesn't make anything you are addicted to automatically bad. You do realise people get addicted to sex don't you? Are you going to label sex then as bad?
Christianity Etc › Re: How Is It Possible That Anyone Will Not See Anything Wrong With Homosexuality? by LordReed(m): 7:40am On Mar 09, 2024
Lawag3:
REED you are an intelligent person I didn't say people will go from pansexuality to beastiality I said support. At a pride month parade a man was ask his sexuality he then said he doesn't follow his dick but his heart that he can sleep with anything the people behind him were cheering him on and clapping there's a video of it online. Homosexuality has always existed and practiced it has not always been this acceptable one time ago a lady married a suit case it was even here on nairaland the Lgbtq community post on Twitter then was GO GIRL, DO YOU, FOLLOW YOUR HEART. You see beastiality as too much but some people feel as long as it's your body you must be allowed to have any kind of sexual freedom or activity and gratification from it.

Same way gay people come out of the closet and are celebrated. people who have sexual attractions towards animals will also declare their sexuality and they will be accepted


It varies some reports and survey puts it at less than 1% others puts it at about 47% for that's for people who regret. As for people who de transitioned it's about 30%
Still the same thing. People supporting pansexuality are not as unreasonable as you to turn into supporting bestiality or pedophilia. That spectre only exists in the minds of unreasonable people like you.

So explain to me how these statistics indicate harm to society.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 (of 1463 pages)