Hismasterpiece: Mr Reed... It is what it is.. when you die you'll know the truth for real... but I strongly suggest that you seek out the truth before that day comes... hell is the worst place in the world to become a believer because at that point it becomes to late...
Funny how you can't answer a simple question in a straightforward manner and you supposedly have the truth with evidence. LoLz!
zinaunreal: You this tout, have you seen that Russia has pulled out of Kyiv and they didn't even stay long according to my unlying statements. You better be watchful on who you deal with online bloody disgusting Atheist. You better go and resinstal your doubts about humanity and existence.
I won't waste my energy again on people like you. You're just a wasted matter
LoLz! Now you are changing mouth and saying they pulled back from Kyiv after saying they would never reach Kyiv. So which is it they never reached Kyiv or they pulled back. Bwahahahahaha.
LoLz. Yeah I call it total bullshìt. You just love to believe whatever you concoct in your imagination instead of open your eyes to reality. Bwahahahahaha!
elated177: It is been done already, Reed. Result: you are not an atheist. Have I not said this to you prior to this moment.
Reed, read my words clearly. I said one of the best of the supposed atheists HERE. Among those who claim atheism here, not that any of you is really an atheist, you are one of the best.
LoLz. That is not an assessment, that's a verdict. Now can you assess my comments.
Dtruthspeaker: I love my life and my wife and both are Real.
Therefore, ioving someone has everything to do with them being real!
No it doesn't. It only requires your emotions to latch unto the object of affection. There are tons of people who are real who you don't love, doesn't make them less real. You even admitted as much.
Dtruthspeaker: Dead, alive makes no difference! People will love whatever they like to love, for whatever reason it pleases them to love in any manner or mode or amount they choose to love.
Dtruthspeaker: Dead, alive makes no difference! People will love whatever they like to love, for whatever reason it pleases them to love in any manner or mode or amount they choose to love.
Exactly so loving someone has nothing to do with if the object of affection is real or alive.
Most of the guys who call themselves atheists here fall into three categories.
1: The damaged ones: These ones were damaged in one way or the other by their former spiritual fathers/mothers. Some of them were sexually abused. It will surprise you to know that many in this category still go to their "church". They only come here and give vent to their anger, trauma, bitterness, frustration, disappointment, etc, because it is a faceless forum. They have been so emasculated that they dare not utter any of what they say here out there. What they have is hatred for their Maker. This hatred stemmed from the abuse they suffered at the hands of evil men and women who parade themselves as the agents of light, but who are indeed agents of darkness.
2: The unconscious agents of wickedness: These one have demons in them and are not aware of it. Out there, they may even go to their "churches". This is the only place where they can act out freely. Most of them dare not utter an iota of what they say here out there.
3: The satanic/demonic agents: These are the conscious satanic/demonic agents. They are agents of darkness/wickedness. Their aim is to steer people away from the path of righteousness and lure them into darkness. They know what they are doing. They know that the Creator exists. They are conscious of their relationship with their father and master, the devil or Satan. Many of them have successfully lured some unstable and unwary "believers" into sinful lifestyles, especially sexual immorality. Their confidence stems from this. Their claim of atheism is a facade. They want you to let your guard down and give them to opportunity to strike. Typical serpentine tactic.
So, when one looks at it critically, there isn't really an atheist on nairaland.
Just to be brief.
El Elohe Yahshrael!
LoLz! Person wey never even comot from him neighbourhood knows everything about people he has never seen, met or talked to IRL. Bwahahahahahaha!
Gadaluck: I'm not a Ronaldo fan whatsoever but this is clout chasing. Maybe ur stupid son should've kept his stupid phone very close to himself and out of the way whilst making the video rather than stick out his hand in Ronaldo's way. The man just lost a match and he rightly isn't happy about that. That phone looks like something that they took and deliberately stomped on to damage it the more. And now there's bruises too? Abeg make this woman go find her medicine drink am....
You think angrily knocking a child's phone down and breaking it is justifiable because you are having a bad day? LoLz. SMH. I am glad that places still exist that won't let someone get away with that type of behaviour.
AJSfan: Russia is the only cheap source of gas for the EU, it will take massive investment in infrastructure and years to successfully replace them. Meanwhile, other markets are opening up for Russia in the East
AJSfan: Honestly I don't understand the success you are talking about. Apart from Mariupol where there are still pockets of Azov fighters, the Russian speaking part of the country has been liberated DPR, LPR. All in less than 2 months.
What is going on there right now is asymmetrical warfare between NATO and Russia. As long as Russia keeps selling oil and gas, they can sustain the battle.
EU has bought $35billion worth oil since Feb 24 when the fight started and they have only donated $1 billion worth of military equipment
If liberating those regions was Putin's goal then he didn't need to launch an assault on Kyiv or to send death squads to hunt Zelensky. With the materiel he has so far expended he could have liberated those regions and held them against any counter attack. It is obvious Putin wants the whole of Ukraine but he is not going to get it.
Oh sure the energy situation is still in his favour but not for long. Germany is already bracing to wean off Russian gas supply and that sentiment will spread. The only reason they can't suddenly let go is because they hadn't prepared for it, now that they see just how strategically locked and vulnerable they are, they will find an alternative.
AJSfan: Economic and Military handcuffs when NATO can't even agree on sanctions. The same Latvia that claimed they were gonna be the first to do without Russian gas has already entered a fresh 30 years contract with them
And why is Putin not being given the Sadam Hussein and Gaddafi treatment? What is so special about him that NATO can't storm Kremlin to go get him?
For reorganization of troups, Russia has definitely lost some fights but to say they have lost the war is disingenuous. As long as DPR, LPR, Mariupol and even Crimea are not under Ukraine control, with all the international support in personel and equipment, Russia is winning the war. Until the day they pull out the way USSR pulled out from Afghanistan, that is the day they lost.
Does it even need to be said? Russia has nukes, lots of nukes. Nobody is going to bell that cat but that doesn't mean Putin has any chance of making a success of his war in Ukraine.
LoLz! When Will Smith slapping Chris Rock is a sign of the New World Order then it is obvious you fellas are the biggest gaslighters there are. Bwahahahahaha!
But what is most funny is you are gaslighting yourselves.
In 2 days it would be 3months since my 2nd Covid 19 vaccine dose. How much longer should I wait to see the so called devastation you have been predicting?
Image123: Russia has been fighting NATO by proxy IMHO.
Maybe but if this is NATO's proxy they can't best then how do you think they'd fare against NATO itself? I mean they pretty much have guaranteed supply lines yet their logistics is a shit show, talk more about if they foray into NATO territory, they'd be so humiliated it would look like a comedy skit.
Image123: i know/knew the meaning. They don't mean what you are saying, though it's all useless grammar. But still, maybe i should rephrase. What is your definition of monotheism and what is your definition of monolatry?
I don't have a definition, whatever definition you got from a credible source is the same one I am using.
Image123: All this one you're speaking is mere grammar, what is important is that i am a child of God. What is the definition of monotheism and what is the definition of monolatry?
This is supposed to be a comical thread , do as you may ....
The villain jumps out of nowhere, and trains his gun on the hero.
-
The hero is unarmed, unprepared, and helpless. He can do nothing against the villain’s gun. He’s completely defenseless.
Then the idiotic villain walks up, and holds the gun right against his head.
Inevitably, the hero will do a cool move, twist the gun out of his hand, and turn it on him.
Sacré bleu! How could this happen?
In real life, that is the dumbest possible move you could make in that situation.
-
You’re holding a gun. You can shoot hundreds of feet.
He has hands. They can punch about 3 feet.
-
Even if you stand just 10 feet away, he’s helpless. Absolutely no chance. You have complete control. Why the hell would you ever put the gun against his head, within range of his hands?
Stay back, keep some space, and you have him dead to rights. He can’t do a thing.
-
Do you really think a professional assassin doesn’t know this? Or a rogue cop? Or an ex-soldier? Or literally any person with at least a minor understanding of firearms?
It’s just common sense. Keep the gun out of range of their hands. It’s super simple stuff, but apparently not simple enough for Hollywood. -
LoLz. Of course in real life the villains don't give you a spiel on their world domination plans, they just blow you away but that doesn't make for a very interesting story. Stories need to have some elements that seem larger than life in other to be interesting. So let's enjoy all that James Bond shite cos we will never be James Bond IRL. Bwahahahahaha!