₦airaland Forum

achorladey:
Wa kekoo.



Shaku shaku research and stupidity is the same serious debate. Na real intelligence be this. . I know your mode of operation.

16 “Look! I am sending you out as sheep among wolves; so prove yourselves cautious as serpents and yet innocent as doves. 17 Be on your guard against men, for they will hand you over to local courts and they will scourge you in their synagogues.

Na men like your Jesus say make we watch out for since na to HUMILIATE people over nairaland you sabi.






Na ATHEISTS now why you dey seek his forgiveness? stupidity and shaku shaku peddling no sell again.



Confirmation that your intelligence don drown. Here is the evidence.......

11:36 am

Well if you think it's about MaxInDHouse i pity you because oteneaaron will not stop his fight against Jesus of Nazareth though you're also an atheist so it's none of your business!

1:51 pm

he's bitterly mad at the way Jesus' name is been revered throughout the earth

11:34 am

So do you think if MaxInDHouse is no more today oteneaaron will drop his argument against the historicity Jesus of Nazareth?


Oteneaaron in his right frame of mind doesn't see himself as my enemy rather he's trying to save me from self delusion over a fictional character "JESUS OF NAZARETH"[/b


If MaxInDHouse die today oteneaaron will still have to [b]continue the fight against his enemy JESUS of Nazareth!

Then you added

That's what it means to be an agent of the intelligence!

Scratch the intelligence part in the last quoted expression of yours and replace it with an agent of STUPIDITY peddling



Jehovah go airpyou

MaxInDHouse:
STORY! STORY!! STORY!!!

Acholardey, what do you say?
Is Jesus real or just a myth?

Bàbá ẹ fi àlọ́ sílẹ̀ kí ẹ dáhùn ìbéèrè!

KnownUnknown:
Those are pictures of American soldiers not Ukrainians.

oteneaaron:
This still does not explain how you HUMILIATED me.

oteneaaron:
Why do you believe I am offended?
Why should I be offended in the first place?
You clearly said you HUMILIATED me.
That is a very strong statement, and I am asking to explain how you HUMILIATED me.
This thread from very beginning was to answer the question of whether Jesus was a real figure from history who existed, and not just a myth.
To make our debate straight forward, we had these points to cover -
Yesterday, you and I laid bare a summary of our points.
So what exactly is the bone of contention right now?
Or is asking you to explain how I was HUMILIATED by you too much to ask?

oteneaaron:
Why are you apologizing?
You never offended me.
I am asking you explain how you "humiliated" me.
Is that too much to ask?

achorladey:
Oga oteneaaron even the humiliation na empty boast.
He has to save his face though

oteneaaron:
Very well.
If you don't mind, I am still waiting for an explanation of how you "humiliated" me.
These were your exact words:

They were all eye Witnesses but the event each person saw differs from what they heard from others who saw things Jesus did in the the presence of the writers.

cornelboy:
I have asked him more than 5 times but he's hiding face
It's your friend Achorladey that can't speak for himself.
He believes in Christ and even defended the Trinity doctrine.
I don't think you know him.
He's on your side because Max is a JW.

oteneaaron:
Lol.
I don't even understand Yoruba to begin with.
This back and forth has become very mentally draining.
I asked for archeological proof of Jesus existence, and I got nothing from you.
I asked for eye witness accounts and you mentioned the Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John.
But when we analyzed your "eye witness" proof, we found a lot discrepancies -
1. If these were "eye witness" accounts why do they contradict each other? It is almost as if each writer was referring to a different Jesus.
And this was your answer:
Till now, I find it very hard to wrap my head around the above reply to explain the contradictions we see in the Gospels.
2. It is a FACT that the first Gospel ever written was the Gospel of Mark.
But was Mark an actual disciple of Jesus to begin with?
The answer is NO.
So how can a man who was not even a disciple of Jesus to begin with, be an eye witness?
3. The other Gospels of Mathew, Luke and John have been proven to be plagiarized copies of Mark's Gospel and it is also a FACT that they were written AFTER Mark.
So how can we depend on the "eye witness" accounts of Mathew, Luke and John which we know were copied from another "eye witness" account of Mark, who we have already identified to not even be a disciple of Jesus in the first place?
-----
Why so many contradictions and discrepancies?
If Jesus was a real figure in history, finding actual archeological evidence should never be an issue.
And eye witness accounts shouldn't have to contradict each other.
---
I can't keep repeating myself over and over again.
I gave you an easy to follow summary of my points yesterday.
Why don't you pick each one and debunk?
Wouldn't that be easier than this merry go round you are currently on?
---

AntiChristian:
Yes.
I am a son to my father only!

Son-in-law has no blood relations...

achorladey:
you must save your face last last
Stupidity peddling na your area of specialty
What this thread all
Oga MaxInDHouse who am I discussing with now? Now it is what I discuss with you is not the matter. To you abi? To me it matters.
Learn you no gree.
Go and bring back my discussion I had with you on Romans 10:9. Since nobody cares what I told you. . I was speaking for myself then too

AntiChristian:
No BP!

It's evident you are telling lies sir!

AntiChristian:
Both account is for Joseph! None is for Mary!

oteneaaron:
Mr Max, why are you throwing tantrums all around this thread?
What else do you want from me?
Or didn't you see the summary I outlined yesterday?
Or do you want me to give you a translation in Hebrew or Greek?

achorladey:
The same mouth dey use to call people God is the same mouth they will use to call people DEVIL, SATAN MAD, OPONU e.t.c.

Me I don't understand the kind of religion this one practice paapaa. At least the Bible they carry says





Na James talk am

MaxInDHouse:
STORY! STORY!! STORY!!!

Acholardey, what do you say?
Is Jesus real or just a myth?

Bàbá ẹ fi àlọ́ sílẹ̀ kí ẹ dáhùn ìbéèrè!

AntiChristian:
This is a lie! Never was that stated in that Luke verse

Jesus Himself was about thirty years old when He began His ministry. He (Jesus) was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melchi, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph Luke 3:23-24

achorladey:
Matter don enter
STORY! STORY!! STORY!!! !!!
What did me and you discuss about the God I serve? is story story you decided to call me all sorts of names based on

Intelligence ti wo omi

oteneaaron:
Why don't you ask him yourself?
You can't even think or speak for yourself, you have practically turned into a MaxInDHouse-part-two.
SMH
I HONEST don't even know where to start with you.

achorladey:
Allow me ooo peddle my save your face oooo.

achorladey:
I will keep repeating it save your face. You cannot come and boast about intelligence and waste your time and energy on shaku shaku research and equally looking for enemies where it is absent
How many times will I show you my colour and you will keep discolouring it with your ATHEISTS, DISGUISED ATHEISTS, APOSTATES, BEAST OF NO NATION, PSYCHOPATH, DEMONS, INSANE, ASIERE, ASINWIN, MAD, SERPENT e.t.c
All the above is still not enough he is still asking me for true colour.
Se wa kekoo

achorladey:
See as e enter trap freely
I thought you are the only peaceful loving group on earth that does not carry weapons and don't fight
So people fight without carrying weapons
Apply your intelligence.

AntiChristian:
Where did Matthew state that?
And how come two different genealogy and only Joseph and David is same while others are different?

AntiChristian:
No it wasn't related to Mary!

Eliud was the father of Eleazar, Eleazar the father of Matthan, Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. Matthew 1:15-16

Jesus Himself was about thirty years old when He began His ministry. He (Jesus) was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melchi, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph Luke 3:23-23

cornelboy:
Achorladey
Tell us, is Jesus a myth or a real person?

achorladey:
Is it not the same you I discussed Romans 10:9 with?



You might as well sleep over Oteneaaron research. Na your palaver to sort. The sons of the world are wiser than the sons of the light. Jesus na your Lord, learn from him since you already believe he is not a myth and dont go about making enemies on things you call shaku shaku research or stupidity.

Apply your intelligence.

achorladey:
.
Did you see me states that this discussion is about MaxInDHouse in the first place?
When I see weapons of mass destruction, guns, cutlasses and other weapons applied by oteneaaron, I will take you serious
Until then, the space on nairaland is still big enough to save your face.

AntiChristian:
[b]The Genealogy was unrelated to Mary but to her husband.[/b] Was Mary mentioned as part of the genealogy?

achorladey:
You can keep peddling your spiteful heart here on nairaland . I didn't send you that message.
Apply your intelligence to both ends of the divide.