₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,778 members, 8,513,634 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 November 2026 at 10:10 AM

Toggle theme

Mazaje's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Mazaje's Profile › Mazaje's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 (of 290 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: The God Hypothesis by mazaje(m): 2:12pm On Mar 27, 2012
^^

Same pit?
Christianity Etc › Re: Children Are Born Believers In God, Academic Claims by mazaje(m): 1:33pm On Mar 27, 2012
tbaba1234: Like i said before, so called contradictions are some people's unwillingness to use their heads: This is almost embarrassing from an atheist to bring this up: Id help you:

Alaqa does not only mean clot of blood, it means that which clings/suspends: You can check the lane's classical arabic dictionary,

if you think im lying, check lanes lexicon (written in the 1800s) check the http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume5/00000421.pdf

There are 4 meanings:
a. Hanging/suspended
b. Suckling blood
c. Leech/worm like substance
d. Blood-clot

Chapter 23 puts everything together

We created man from an essence of clay-
then We placed him as a drop of fluid in a safe place.(s-perm)
Then We made that drop of fluid into a clinging form (baby in womb)
and then We made that form into a lump of flesh, and We made that lump into bones, and We clothed those bones with flesh, and later We made him into other forms. Glory be to God the best of creators. (development of baby) (chapter 23:14)

Notice the use of the word 'then': It shows a progression:

This shows that is a progression not a contradiction: he was made from an essence of clay, after that man reproduce from the s-emen and from the reproductory process

Now lets break it down

We created man from an essence (sulaalah) of (min) clay (tin)

The word sulaalah means an extract, something drawn out or the most subtle, purest and essential constituent
(John Penrice. A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran. Dover Publications. 2004, page 70.)
(Edward William Lane. An Arabic-English Lexicon. Librairie Du Liban. 1968. Vol. 4, page 1397.) http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume4/00000121.pdf

Even the classical scholars understood this: al-Qurtubi; the 9th Century Persian historian and scholar, al-Tabari;and the 12th century Iraqi physician and historian al-Baghdadi.Significantly, other exegetes suggest these words also refer to the essential elements of the human body, which consist of various chemical components found in clay.
You took one rendering of the statement and gave a very long commentary on it. . .There are many other verses that say other wise, example. . .

Could it be from earth?

11:61 It is He Who hath produced you from the earth

32:7 He began the creation of man from clay

Or water?

25:54 It is He Who has created man from water



Oxygen, Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Calcium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sulfur, Chlorine, Sodium, Magnesium and Silicon are all essential in the human makeup: So our essence is of clay:
All the elements you mentioned are also found in rocks and the sun, does that mean we are made from rocks or the sun?. . .These elements are abundant all over the world and they make up all living matter including all animals and plants. . .

Shafi Usmani (Jurist) writes: The words sulaalah means ‘extract’ and tin means ‘wet earth’ or ‘clay’ and the verse means that man was created from some special elements extracted from earth.(Shafi Usmani. Mariful Qur’an. Vol. 6, page 307.)

Hamza Tzortis states:

"The key word allowing for the above interpretation is sulaalah (extract, something drawn out etc.). This clearly indicates that it is not clay from which the human is created but an extract of clay, which alludes to the necessary chemical components required for human life. If this contention refers to the creation of Adam, then it can be addressed by referring to the Islamic theological understanding of miracles. The creation of Adam was not a natural event, rather it was a supernatural event that cannot be explained naturalistically." (Embryology in the Quran)
Funny islamic apologetics. . .Wet earth is not the same as clay, extract is not the same as essential constituent of something, so which is it extract or essentail constituient?Or water?

25:54 It is He Who has created man from water. . .The two words are different and the apologist you quoted can not have it both ways, does the Koran say man was created from the extract of clay or essential constituents of clay essential constituent of clay ?


So man's made up of an essence of clay-

Then We made that drop of fluid into a clinging form
a. Hanging/suspended- baby clings to mothers womb

The Embryo is connected to the cytotrophoblast by a connecting stalk of extra-embryonic mesoderm (primitive connective tissue). The stalk is the forerunner of the umbilical cord. (Barry Mitchell and Ram Sharma. Embryology: An Illustrated Colour Text. 2nd Edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2009, page 2.)

Caviation of the extra-embryonic mesoderm does not occur at the connecting stalk which remains intact to suspend the developing embryo in the extra-embryonic coelom (The Fundamentals of Human Embryology. 2nd Edition. Wits University Press. 2010, page 27.)

b. Suckling blood - baby depends on mother for blood

Due to the rapid growth of the embryo during the second week, there is a need for a more efficient means of nutritional and gaseous exchange. This is achieved when the embryonic blood vessels of the chorion come into contact with the maternal blood vessels of the decidua. (Embryology: An Illustrated Colour Text. 2nd Edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2009, page 10.)

c. Leech/worm like substance- Baby gets food off mum and at some stage looks like a leech/worm.

Another membrane becomes the yolk sac, which provides nourishment for the early embryo. By 24 days, a connecting stalk appears in the middle of the now worm-like body (Dale Layman. Anatomy Demystified.2004, page 366.)


d. Blood-clot-

There is a lack of blood circulation until the third week: a primary cardio-vascular system is developed:

The heart and great vessels form from mesenchymal cells in the heart primordium-cardiogenic area. Paired, endothelium-lined channels-endocardial heart tubes-develop during the third week and fuse to form a primordial heart tube. The tubular heart joins with blood vessels in the embryo, connecting stalk, chorion, and umbilical vesicle [yolk sac] to form a primordial cardiovascular system. By the end of the third week, the blood is circulating, and the heart begins to beat on day 21 or 22. (Before We Are Born: Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects. 7th Edition. Saunders. 2008, page 48.)

So Man is made of an essense of clay and develops through the reproductive system (sperm drop and embryo development):
From the answers in Islam website which I happen to agree with it says "This is hardly a scientific description of embryonic development. It ignores to mention the female egg (the second and equally important half) and the process of fertilization when egg and sperm unite to form one new cell.

It mentions the obvious [the sperm], the visible, that which all mankind knew for a long time that it is necessary to "make" a baby. The Qur'an does NOT mention the invisible, that which we know only through modern medicine. Had God really wanted to reveal something nobody could know at that time, in order to prove the divine origin of his revelation, he would have talked e.g. about the "equal contribution of the female through the ovum to form the new person and how the two come together and form one being
". . . .



Now that is cleared: Let's move to the other "contradictions"

19:67. But does not man call to mind that We created him before out of nothing?

At some point in the history of earth, humans did not exist:
At some point the whole universe did not exist; that point is nothing. when nothing existed.

Ibn kathir says of this verse : Allah uses the beginning of creation as a proof for its repetition. This means that He, the Exalted, created the human being while he was nothing. So can he not repeat this creation after the human had actually become something Similalry Allah says;

And He it is Who originates the creation, then He will repeat it; and this is easier for Him. (30:27)

It talks of a time before creation of man when he was essentially non-existent:

Adam came from dust: The creation of adam was a miracle and does not tie to the human development process or the fact that at some point we were nothing; nonexistent....

Every "contradiction" like i said can be easily dismantled.

Please be open minded...
Fair enough, sound explanation. . . .


It is a shame i have to respond to this, even an arab christian or jew will confirm what i spoke of, about the literary genius of the Quran.

a. The controversial thesis of Hagarism is not widely accepted. The authors are even called conjectoral:: And nothing has been said to contradict the literary excellence

Josef Van Ess argued that "a refutation is perhaps unnecessary since the authors make no effort to prove it (the hypothesis of the book) in detail. , Where they are only giving a new interpretation of well-known facts, this is not decisive. But where the accepted facts are consciously put upside down, their approach is disastrous."

R. B. Searjeant informs us that "Hagarism … is not only bitterly anti-Islamic in tone, but anti-Arabian. Its superficial fancies are so ridiculous that at first one wonders if it is just a ‘leg pull’, pure ’spoof’."

David Waines, Professor of Islamic Studies Lancaster University states: "The Crone-Cook theory has been almost universally rejected. The evidence offered by the authors is far too tentative and conjectural (and possibly contradictory) to conclude that Arab-Jewish were as intimate as they would wish them to have been."

b.This does not affect the literary excellence of the book:

The creator of the everything, can swear using any of his creations

The Quran was not revealed in the form of a document or a book, but rather it was revealed by inspiration to Prophet Mohamed (saws) in the form of discourses over a period of 23 years; which the Noble Prophet (saws) recited and declared verbatim to his listerners.
Thus, in the course of revelation, at times it seems that Allah Subhanah is addressing mankind in the first person, most times it seems the Lord is addressing Prophet Mohamed (saws) as in a conversation or the second person, and at times it seems that the Merciful Lord is speaking in the third person, narrating the Truth of what transpired in the past or what will transpire in the future! All three modes of conversation have been utilized by the All-Knowing, All Wise Lord for his chosen last and final Message, which He revealed as the Book of Guidance to all mankind until the end of time.

Examples of when the Lord All-Mighty address mankind in the third person:

21. Allah Says in the Holy Quran Chapter 2 Surah Baqarah verse 255: Allah! There is no Allah but He the living the Self-subsisting Eternal. No slumber can seize Him nor sleep. His are all things in the heavens and on earth. Who is there can intercede in His presence except as He permitteth? He knoweth what (appeareth to his creatures as) before or after or behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His throne doth extend over the heavens and the earth and He feeleth no fatigue in guarding and preserving them. For He is the Most High the Supreme (in glory).
Allah Says in the Holy Quran Chapter 59 Surah Hashr verses 22-24:
22 Allah is He than whom there is no other god, Who knows (all things) both secret and open; He Most Gracious Most Merciful.
23 Allah is He than whom there is no other god, The Sovereign, The Holy One, The Source of Peace (and Perfection), The Guardian of Faith, The Preserver of Safety, The Exalted in Might, The Irresistible, The Supreme: Glory to Allah! (High is He) above the partners they attribute to Him.
24 He is Allah, The Creator, The Evolver, The Bestower of Forms (or colors). To Him belong the Most Beautiful Names: Whatever is in the heavens and on earth doth declare His Praises and Glory: and He is the Exalted in Might, The Wise.

This is part of the remarkable eloquence of the book.

c. Reinach Salomon did not read an Arabic Quran, He is not a literature expert, He did not like islam. He is a historian.

d. This is not a literary statement but it is worthy of a proper response.

The Yemeni government hired Gerd Puin, one of the world's leading authorities on Qur'anic historical orthography, or the study and scholarly interpretation of ancient manuscripts, to study the oldest manuscript of the Quran.

After the publication of the Atlantic Monthly by lester.

Dr. Puin himself has in fact denied all the findings that Lester ascribes to him, with the exception of occasional differences in the spelling of some words. Here is a part of Puin's letter - which he wrote to al-QaQi Isma'il al-Akwa' shortly after Lester's article - with its translation. (i could not paste the arabic here)

The important thing, thank God, is that these YemeniQur' anic fragments do not differ from those found in museums and libraries elsewhere, with the exception of details that do not touch the Qur'an itself, but are rather differences in the way words arc spelled. This phenomenon is well-known,even in the Qur'an published in Cairo in which is written:

Ibrhim next to Ibrhm
Quran next to Qrn
Simahum next to Simhum

In the oldest Yemeni Qur'anic fragments, for example, the phenomenon of not writing the vowel algis rather common. (For the Arabic text of his complete letter,see the Yemeni newspaper, ath- Thauna, issue 24.11.1419 A.H./ 11.3.1999.)


This deflates the entire controversy, dusting away the webs of intrigue that were spun around Puin's discoveries and making them a topic unworthy
of further speculation."

As regard to the Sana'a Manuscripts, there is nothing "shocking" about its discovery. At most, it is claimed that there is a fragment where the end of sura 26 is followed by 37. But this amounts to nothing, since it is permissable to place suras in any order in a partial mushaf. So this is hardly "news" or a "shocking" discovery.
I don't know much about classical arabic. . .Nice refutations any way, but you just dismissed some of them on the grounds that they are anti islam or anti arab. . . That is the case of attacking the messenger instead of the message. . .But nice refutation over all I must say. . .My point is that, their are many books that have enlightened man, giving man more knowledge and understanding of himself and his environment in all ramifications of his life than the Koran. . .If you are saying that the Koran is better than all arabic literature before it then I won't say much about it or argue, if the challenge of presenting a better book was only meant for the ancient arabs then i won't argue about it as well, but if the challenge is for the whole of humanity to produce a better book than the Koran, then I will say that there are many books that are much better than the Koran. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Children Are Born Believers In God, Academic Claims by mazaje(m): 4:42am On Mar 27, 2012
dekung: This Dr. Barret or whatever he is called just told a big lie. How did he come to that conclussion? Did he conduct any experiment over time? My problem with most religious people is the speed with which they jump at any 'scientific' report, provided it supports their belief, which subjecting such postulation to critical reasoning. If children were born with faith how come they still ask questions about God? Every human being is born agnostic. S/he has no idea of anything and as s/he grows up indoctrination makes him/her believe whatever it is he finally cmes to believe. Barret claimed if children were left in the desert to raise themselves they will still worship God. Lie! The Piraha people do not even believe in any deity, they dont even care if or not one exists. They live their lives one day at a time and they can be said to be one of the happiest people on earth.
Every child is born without the knowledge of any deity until his parents tell him 'Jesus is the way, truth and life.....' or 'there is only one God and Mohammed is the messenger of that God'
Dr. Justin Barrett is the Director of the thrive center for human development at the fuller theological seminary. So he must be bias in favor of religion. . . .I think it has already been established pretty well that the human mind has an instinctive "agency bias". We tend to see purpose and agency in things that don't actually have them. Most of the results in this study are an outgrowth of this already known, and already explained, effect. With some bias added in to make it look like support for religion, when it is actually the opposite. It gives a naturalistic explanation of where religion comes from.
Christianity Etc › Re: Children Are Born Believers In God, Academic Claims by mazaje(m): 4:26am On Mar 27, 2012
tbaba1234: Given the circumstances of the quranic revelation, It was revealed over a period of 23 years in different circumstances, in times of peace and conflict, and it remains remarkably consistent.

Write a book for 23 years and see how many times your opinions change. The quran underwent no editing throughout the period, once the revelation comes, it is memorised or written by those who can write. and it is still considered the 'most eminent written manifestation' of the arabic language'.“Notwithstanding the literary excellence of some of the long pre-Islamic poems...the Qur'an is definitely on a level of its own as the most eminent written manifestation of the Arabic language.” [/i]Martin R. Zammit. A Comparative Lexical Study of Qur'anic Arabic. Brill. 2002, page 37.

I have read the bible and parts of the vedas and and there are discrepancies acknowledged even by their scholars.

Any discrepancy claimed is easily refuted. I think, an impartial sincere look at the Quran by anyone will reveal that there are none.
Still doesn't make it special, people have conducted research and written books about their research that spanned a period of about 30 years with consistency and no contradictions. The Koran as we know it today did not exist during the time of Mohammed so the issue about it not being edited is tenuous. . .The Koran does contain some contradiction. . . .Here is one. . .

What was man created from, blood, clay, dust, or nothing?

"Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood," (96:2).
"We created man from sounding clay, from mud moulded into shape, (15:26).
"The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: "Be". And he was," (3:59).
"But does not man call to mind that We created him before out of nothing?" (19:67, Yusuf Ali). Also, 52:35).
"He has created man from a sperm-drop; and behold this same (man) becomes an open disputer! (16:4).


In Surah 19:67, it states that man was created out of nothing. In 15:26, man is created from clay. . . Since clay is something, we have a contradiction since "nothing" excludes the possibility of "clay." Both cannot be true. . . . .

This challenge is not a subjective challenge, It is an objective one. The Quran is only the Quran in the arabic language... Translations do not capture the eloquence an of the book. The word choice, the sentence construction are not captured in translations. The challenge is made up of a number of points:

1. Replicate the Qur’ans literary form
2. Match the unique linguistic genre of the Qur’an
3. Select and arrange words like that of the Qur’an.
4. Select and arrange particles like that of the Qur’an.
5. Match the Qur’ans phonetic superiority.
6. Equal the frequency of rhetorical devices
7. Match the level of informativity
8. Equal the Qur’ans conciseness and flexibility

It is agreed by most scholars muslim and non-muslim that the literary form of the Quran does not fit into the genres of Arabic literature. It is beyond the bounds of the arabic literature patterns.For over a thousand years no one has met this challenge.

Forster Fitzgerald Arbuthnot, British Orientalist and translator, states:
[i]“…and that though several attempts have been made to produce a work equal to it as far as elegant writing is concerned, none has as yet succeeded.
( F. Arbuthnot, The Construction of the Bible and the Koran, London, 1885, p 5.)

Devin J. Stewart states, “Both in the Qur’an and in later saj’(literary form with rhythm and rhyme) we see that shorter saj’ is much more common, but the range in the Qur’an is greater.” (Devin J. Stewart, Saj’ in the Qur’an: Prosody and Structure, p.102.)

Taha Husayn :
“But you know that the Qur’an is not prose and that it is not verse either. It is rather Qur’an, and it cannot be called by any other name but this. It is not verse, and that is clear; for it does not bind itself to the bonds of verse. And it is not prose, for it is bound by bonds peculiar to itself, not found elsewhere; some of the binds are related to the endings of its verses, and some to that musical sound which is all its own.
Some Koranic scholars have said other wise. . .few researchers on the opinions on the Koran:

(a) [The Qur'an] is strikingly lacking in overall structure, frequently obscure and inconsequential in both language and content, perfunctory in its linking of disparate materials, and given to the repetition of whole passages in variant versions. On this basis it can plausibly be argued that the book is the product of belated and imperfect editing of materials from a plurality of traditions. - Patricia Crone and Michael Cook, Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World, (Cambridge, 1977) p. 18

(b) the Qur'an is not always presented as the speech of God. Numerous critics of the Qur'an have pointed to instances where God is mentioned in the third person. Regarding these critics, Benjamin Walker writes:
"Some asked what need there was for God to take oaths like any mortal being, as when he swears by the fig and olive, and by Mount Sinai (95:1); by the declining day (103:1); and by the stars, the night and the dawn (81:15-1. Above all, they asked why the Almighty had to swear on himself
Who Wrote the Bible? by Richard E. Friedman

(c) From the literary point of view, the Koran has little merit. Declamation, repetition, puerility, a lack of logic and coherence strike the unprepared reader at every turn. It is humiliating to the human intellect to think that this mediocre literature has been the subject of innumerable commentaries, and that millions of men are still wasting time absorbing it - Reinach, Salomon, Orpheus: A History of Religion, (New York, 1932), p. 176, as cited in both Warraq, Quest for the Historical Muhammad, p. 9, and Katz, Bernard, The Ways of an Atheist, (Prometheus, 1999), p. 145

(d)My idea is that the Koran is a kind of cocktail of texts that were not all understood even at the time of Muhammad. Many of them may even be a hundred years older than Islam itself. Even within the Islamic traditions there is a huge body of contradictory information, The Qur’an claims for itself that it is ‘mubeen,’ or clear, but if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn’t make sense. Many Muslims will tell you otherwise, of course, but the fact is that a fifth of the Qur’anic text is just incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding translation. If the Qur’an is not comprehensible, if it can’t even be understood in Arabic, then it’s not translatable into any language. That is why Muslims are afraid. Since the Qur’an claims repeatedly to be clear but is not—there is an obvious and serious contradiction. Something else must be going on -Gerd-R. Puin


I have always had an open mind; that is why i have studied the facts of most major religions. Islam is the only one that provides logical answers to all the major life questions.
Fair enough but that is subjective. . . .
Family › Re: Is It Normal For A Woman To Shout At Her Husband? by mazaje(m): 3:27am On Mar 27, 2012
queensmith: Shout when im angry...nothing wrong in that
The same way it will be ok for your husband to slap you when he is angry, nothing wrong with that as well. . . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 2:52am On Mar 27, 2012
seguun: I expected you to at least provide me with a prove from an experiment that shows the absence of antibiotics in a drink in which a fly has been dipped, all you have to say is to make a conclusion from your own words.
You've concluded on yourself the reason the scientists used ethanol was because the antibiotics cannot be released in any other liquid, this the report never claimed.
And don't try to generalise by asking me to read about how antibiotics is extracted. The DNA of a fly is different from that of a tiger, i said this because we are dealing with flies specifically.
The report has nothing to say about a fly falling into a drink. . .It only talks about how antibiotics are extracted from the surface of flies by using ethanol and a filter. . .Are you saying that if a fly falls into a cup of water it will release antibiotic into the water?. . .is that what you are saying?. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Children Are Born Believers In God, Academic Claims by mazaje(m): 9:46pm On Mar 26, 2012
[quote author=emöfine2]Sweetnecta, let me tell you something. If a person is irreligious or does not adhere to the popular faiths such as Islam or Christianity it doesn't mean that such people are not conscious of a creator.

I actually have beliefs but you wouldn’t know that because you fail to ask as other individuals do on this forum. Only one person in my whole time in this entire forum has bothered to inquire about my beliefs and such encounter did not even take place in the religious section.
When a person declares that they are neither for Allah or Jehovah it appears many people here readily assume that such a person is atheist. When a person discusses with another individual or collective of a particular status some people lump the foreigner with the majority. When a person asks questions some people are averse to answer because some assume that such person is a trouble maker or some really care because they think that such a person is lost and looking for directions.

Let me tell you now, I belong to none of those demographics. I am not floating or flirting with different belief systems. I already have my own beliefs if you care to check. However I am very interested in learning more about other people’s beliefs and philosophies. There is nothing more I despise than willful ignorance. I don’t like to adhere to any cast roles awarded to any collective or individual by any biased or bigoted people including the media. When I want to find out more about a particular people I will investigate said people preferably by first hand. So when I read the Quaran it doesn't mean I've made a sub-conscious choice to adopt Allah as my God. When I quote the Bible it doesn't mean that I have faith in the text I reiterate. I converse with you in the language you understand to make our communication more amicable it’s just a shame that that same courtesy often or not is never extended. Just because I’m sensitive to another people’s belief or unbelief doesn't mean I revere it.

Sorry to write that whole epistle but I think it’s about time you know where I stand.[/quote]Strange that non of the feral childern express any such beliefs as the research shows. In fact the ones raised by dogs and wolves in the wild seemed to think they were dogs or wolves. . .Such cases have been very well documented. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: The God Hypothesis by mazaje(m): 9:26pm On Mar 26, 2012
Victor Stenger. . . .I like the old man. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Children Are Born Believers In God, Academic Claims by mazaje(m): 9:13pm On Mar 26, 2012
tbaba1234: Faith in my opinion has to be backed with reason. The faith the Our'an builds in men for instance is not at all blind or arbitrary, it seeks to be substantiated by the dictates of reason and intellect. The Quran comes with its falsification tests:

Do they not consider the Qur'an [with care]? Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy. (4:82)
Is this the falsifiable test? Many men have written books that do not contain any discrepancies inside. . . .Some religious books contain no discrepancies as well. ..Many say the Koran contains some discrepancies. . .

And if ye are in doubt as to what We have revealed from time to time to Our servant, then produce a Sura (chapter) like thereunto; and call your witnesses or helpers [If there are any] besides Allah, if your [doubts] are true. But if ye cannot- and of a surety ye cannot- then fear the Fire whose fuel is men and stones,- which is prepared for those who reject Faith.(2:23-24)
There are many books that teach more about morals, social order, and give a better understanding of the world around than the Koran. . . .If you want to know about man his nature and the nature of his surrounding environment a biology, physics, geography and chemistry text book will give you much more knowledge about that than the Koran. . .Men have written books that have impacted them with more knowledge about their nature and that of their surrounding environmental for example than the Koran. . .So i really do not understand why muslims keep bringing up this point of providing a book that is better than the Koran. . .The Grey's anatomy text book better explains the basic nature of man than the Koran for example. . .Men have written better books than the Koran in many different aspects. . .Even when it comes to morals, political and social systems, men have written better books than the Koran. . .


So for me, if you claim that this is true , there has to be evidence to back this up.

We have an inclination towards God in our natural state, but our convictions have to be made consciously and this is often times based on our biased views and prejudices.

I support your views on letting the kids understand the reasons why they do things instead of forcing them. either way the kids form their opinions based on what they are surrounded with most times.

Sometimes we need to step out of our comfort zone and really try to find truth.
How do you find the truth when you are indoctrinated to believe that there is no God but Allah(meaning all other Gods are false) and Mohammed is is last messenger?. . .You can't go about finding the truth once you have been indoctrinated with such a line, you can only go out to look for confirmation or things that will agree with what you have been indoctrinated with. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Having A Conversation With an Atheist About God by mazaje(m): 8:46pm On Mar 26, 2012
Obi1kenobi: I find religious bigots (as you've exhibited) just as egotistical and proud (in a most unsubstantiated way too) and they are generally products of childhood indoctrination incapable of thinking any other way from the rigid dogmatic belief inculcated or beaten into them since birth. I can see the holistic, integrated, organic advancement of rabidly religious fanatics and god botherers in Nigeria. wink

All your points exhibit crass ignorance but this was the worst. Western civilization wasn't made great by what you probably purport to be the God of the Abrahamic religions. If anything Western civilization witnessed a most unprecedented revival that sent them out of the dark ages when they embraced greater secularity and recognized plurality of philosophical thought. Western creativity and ingenuity under the new found liberation from religious constraints since the rennaisance made the white race the pre-eminent race on the planet coupled with visionary leadership that learnt to seperate religion from state.

The most advanced nations on the earth are the most secular. The most impoverished nations on earth are the most religious and superstitious. Go figure why that is.


It's funny that the dominant religions in this country where absorbed from these "foolish hosts" (as you so sweetly put it). The average blackman's "love and pleasure for material things" is also a motivation for their religious fanaticism. If they are not dreaming of reaping wealth from the "seeds" they are "sowing", they're dreaming of a utopian afterlife where they'll walk gold-laden roads and live happily ever after. The black race is the most gullible and naive on the planet and are quickest to absorb EVERYTHING from their white masters including their religion and proceed to fight over it as if it's their own legacy.

In summary, you really don't know what you're talking about. I can just about cope with the god botherers disturbing my street. Just don't look to saddle your folly on everyone and moan because people don't agree with you.
+ 1000
Christianity Etc › Re: Muslim And Christian Faiths. by mazaje(m): 8:37pm On Mar 26, 2012
Conditioning and indoctrination is the name of the word. . .A muslim will always put the koran on top of every other book. . .A christian will tear the koran and use it to wip off his bum bum after using the toilet without feeling a thing. . .Indoctrination is what makes you a christian just the same way as indoctrination is what makes sweetnecta a muslim. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 8:33pm On Mar 26, 2012
seguun: Oga! it is you that don't seem to understand the report of the research, in a simple way, it is the presence of the antibiotics on the fly's surface that makes the diseases harmless to the fly. So, if the fly falls into some liquid and its cells saturates in the liquid, definitely both the diseases and the antibiotics will be released in the liquid thereby, making the diseases harmless in the liquid. My point is, if the antibiotics is present in the liquid, it will definitely make the diseases harmless unless you can prove the absence of antibiotics in the drink in which a fly has been dipped.
Mr atheist! stop being mischievous!! when did i say somebody who has cholera already should dip a fly in his water and drink to cure cholera?
NO, the antibiotic on the surface of the fly will not be released into the liquid, if it will the research will not talk about using ethanol to extract the antibiotic from the surface of the fly. . .Read about antibiotics and how they are extracted so that you will have a better understanding. . .Are you saying that simply dipping a fly in water for example will release the antibiotic found on its surface inside the water?. . .If that is what you are saying then it is false. . .Dipping a fly in water will not make the antibiotic on its surface to be released into the water. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Children Are Born Believers In God, Academic Claims by mazaje(m): 7:19pm On Mar 26, 2012
tbaba1234: Every kid would undergo some kind of preconditioning , if they do not get it from parents/relatives, they get it from society and friends. Id argue that it is better kids are indoctrinated at home than outside of it. Kids do not just develop convictions, they do so based on their environment. There is another study that claims that if kids were left on an island to develop their own civilization.. They would end up worshiping something [i would look up the reference]. The belief in a divine is within us.
The normal human instinct is firstly for survival and recognition of his/her environment. . .The God instinct comes based on the fact that we humans are creative and create things so it follows that we will normally assume that the earth was created. The human being in his primitive and natural form is superstitious. . .

The signs of God are subtle: sometimes the signs come to us and we reject it even though it has already being ingrained in us.The Quran uses the word 'kafir' to describe those who disbelieve: Kafir simply means to hide, to bury, to deny the truth already ingrained within yourself. The word normally translated as verse in the quran is called 'ayat' which actually means sign.

The quran states

We have sent down to thee Manifest Signs [ayat]; and none reject them but those who are perverse.(2:99)

And how would ye deny Faith while unto you are rehearsed the Signs of Allah, and among you Lives the Messenger? Whoever holds firmly to Allah will be
shown a way that is straight.
(3:101)

If one is sincere, and asks God for guidance. then guidance will come. As long as the signs are not denied.
When then do so many people fail to see such "signs". . .And when referring to God which one of the many Gods available is the true God(s)?. . .If we allow kids to form a civilization on an island, do you think that will ever come to declare the muslim declaration of faith statement(shahada)?. . .Do the "signs" lead people to Allah?. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Children Are Born Believers In God, Academic Claims by mazaje(m): 5:19pm On Mar 26, 2012
Wanted to reply but when I saw that Dr. Justin Barrett is the Director of the thrive center for human development at the fuller theological seminary. I saw the bias and decided not to. . .The bottom line is that INDOCTRINATION is what makes people accept what ever concept of God and religion their parents indoctrinate them with. .The indoctrination has to be done at an early age for it to remain a part of the child's life. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 5:13pm On Mar 26, 2012
seguun: The scientists extracting the antibiotics using ethanol does not mean there will be absence of antibiotics in the drink the fly is dipped into. That is why I asked you to provide us with any scientific experiment that proves the drink contaminates more.
It seems you do not understand what the research is all about. . .The research is about finding antibiotics in and on flies based on the fact that they carry bacteria all over them but the bacteria do not harm them. . .The antibiotic they carry has to first extracted by ethanol, filtered and synthesized before it can be of any use. . .When a fly falls into a drink the millions of bacteria in its legs and saliva will contaminate the drink. . .The antibiotic is for the protection of the fly.

The extracting and synthesising is only to make it easy to study in the lab. They are trying to know how the antibiotics can be used to treat other human health problems.
If you don't mind, show me where in the report did the scientists say there will be absence of antibiotics in any other liquid apart from ethanol?
How then does this support your prophet's assertion that dipping a fly that falls in a person's drink will provide cure for the disease it carries? The antibiotic is for the protection of the fly and will have to be removed using special chemicals like ethanol, when it is removed it has to be filtered and synthesized before if can be used . . .Are you saying that just re-immersing a the fly that falls into you water or coca cola will remove the antibiotic and provide cure for cholera for example? If that is the case why are people not immersing flies into water and drinking the water as a cure for diseases like cholera?
Christianity Etc › Re: Did Jesus Really Exist? Proving Jesus Without The Bible by mazaje(m): 3:15pm On Mar 26, 2012
^^

Visnu definitely exist, it was proven by the verders. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Did Jesus Really Exist? Proving Jesus Without The Bible by mazaje(m): 2:03pm On Mar 26, 2012
rabzy: The fact of Jesus existence is unassailable.
It is, and it has. . . .http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/jesus_myth_history.htm#2. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 1:40pm On Mar 26, 2012
seguun: Oh i see! SIMPLE LOGIC indeed!! so your simple logic tells you the diseases on the fly manifest in the drink but does not tell you the antibiotics will also manifest in the drink. Just at least be SINCERE!
In your opinion you've concluded the fly's wings are not on its surface, I continue to ask you, are they situated in its belly?
Yourself admitted it's an on going research yet you keep on jumping to conclusion. Na wa o!
No, normally a fly carries diseases on its legs and in its saliva, it also carries antibiotics in its gut and on its body surface that protects it from the harmful bacteria it carries about or in where it feeds since it normally feeds in bacteria filled environment. . .The antibiotic is carries on its body can only be extracted using ethanol and chemically synthesized first before it can be used, it is not helpful to the human in its natural form. it has to be extracted and chemically synthesized and made useful before it can be used according to the research. . .So NO, it will not manifest in the drink but the millions of bacteria in the fly's saliva and legs will contaminate the drink it falls into. . .The wing is situated on the surface but the antibiotic is NOT to be found on one wing of the fly. .It is to be found on its surface and it has to be chemically extracted and synthesized to be of any use to humans which is a process. . .Re-immersing a fly into your drink when it falls into it is a harmful exercise. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 11:06am On Mar 26, 2012
seguun: Mr atheist see how you contradicted yourself, you are already concluding dipping the fly in the drink will contaminate the drink the more in one hand, and you admitted it's an ongoing research in other hand. SHOW ME THE SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT THAT PROVES DIPPING THE FLY IN THE DRINK WILL CONTAMINATE IT THE MORE?.
This is simple logic, on average a fly carries about 6 million bacteria on its legs. . .When a fly falls into your drink the bacteria gets into your drink as well when you immerse the fly into your drink. .

Even if we go by "on their surface" I still ask you is one flies wings situated in their belly?
There is a difference between the wings of the fly and its body surface IMO. . .

May be I should make it clearer to you. The whole point is that a fly that carry such an amount of disease also carries the cure.
The difference between the scientists and the Prophet(saw) is that the prophet mentioned where the disease and the cure is located, the scientists say it's an ongoing research but agree the fly carries antibiotic which unknown before now.
Not really, the prophet says that flies carry diseases on one of their wings and cure on the other. . .That is not true because flies carry diseases on their legs and in their saliva and not on their wings. . .The antibiotics can be found both in the guts of flies and on their surface. . .That is very different from what the prophet says. . .How exactly does dipping a fly into your drink provide a cure to anything as the prophet said?. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 9:43am On Mar 26, 2012
seguun: May be I should make it clearer to you. The whole point is that a fly that carry such an amount of disease also carries the cure.
The difference between the scientists and the Prophet(saw) is that the prophet mentioned where the disease and the cure is located, the scientists say it's an ongoing research but agree the fly carries antibiotic which unknown before now.
The prophet we are told said flies carry diseases on one of their wings, that is not true because flies do not carry diseases on their wings but on their foot and in their saliva. . .He said the cure is to be found on one of the wings. . .That is also not true because according to the research the antibiotics are not to be found on one of the wings, but in the gut of the fly and on its surface he also said that the cure can be obtained by re-immersing the fly into the drink, which is also false, will you continue ingesting your drink after a fly falls into it? Will you re-immerse the fly inside your drink and take it as a cure for your disease?. . .The way the antibiotics can be found is by dropping the fly into ethanol, filtering the antibiotic and synthesizing it. . .Re-immersing a fly into your drink when it falls inside it is a useless exercise. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Can Heaven Satisfy All? by mazaje(m): 9:15am On Mar 26, 2012
[quote author=emöfine2]Na enjoyment nau. Who no like good thing before? See as e con resemble bribe sef. But as an extra guarantee to attract more followers who may have otherwise been uninterested there is the threat of hell to steer people into the path that leads to heaven.[/quote]Ridiculous bribe sef, but all these good things can be gotten here on earth, many people live in houses with gold furniture, wear very good clothes, have lots of women to have sex with, have endless supply of wine, are never in very hot or very cold environment, even if its very hot or cold they don;t feel it either because they are always in an air conditioned or fully heated environment where ever they go. . . .The idea of hell is quite understandable. . .It forces people in line and make them accept the nonsense out of fear of the unknown. . .

They are not to be enticed of the things of this world only to be lured by the promise of heaven by things which are of this world or can be found in the world huh

Abi now.

So it’s a sin to be taken in by the pleasures of the world but if one abstains one will get to indulge in such materialism for eternity huh undecided
Basically one will have to travail on earth in order to make it to a place called heaven just to find it’s basically an extension of earth undecided
I would have thought that something that we earthly beings have not already experienced or had knowledge of would have been a more apt "reward".
Yes ohh,. . .Very well said. . .everything to be found in heaven exist here on earth so what exactly is all the fantasy about?. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists, Christians Clash At Washington, DC Protest by mazaje(m): 9:04am On Mar 26, 2012
Reason rally?.....What the hell is that. . .LOL. . .

If it were the other way round, we would have been hearing about atheists persecuting christians.....Why didn't they allow them hold their rally and leave?. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Can Heaven Satisfy All? by mazaje(m): 8:18am On Mar 26, 2012
^^

What do you need rivers of honey, rivers of wine and lots of women for? There are many people that get all these things here on earth. . .The islamic heaven to me is just the fantasy of perverted men. . .The christian heaven the fantasy of persecuted and oppressed men. . .
Christianity Etc › Synagogue Church Of All Nations Caught Selling Fake Miracles In Britain by mazaje(op): 10:34pm On Mar 25, 2012
At least six people have died in Britain after being told they had been healed of HIV and could stop taking their medication, Sky News has discovered.

There is evidence evangelical churches in London, Manchester, Birmingham and Glasgow are claiming to cure HIV through God.
Sky sent three undercover reporters to the Synagogue Church of All Nations (SCOAN), which is based in Southwark, south London.
All of them told the pastors they were HIV positive - all were told they could be healed.
Once a month, the church has a prayer line, where people from across Europe come to be cured of all kinds of illness.


http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16117269
I wonder how many people have been killed by these fake healers in Nigeria. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op):
[quote author=Mai-suya]What are the odds your my grand father in the village will make a claim that flies carry cure (antibiotic) on them?

After you've answered that, what are the odds that some one who lived in d desert 1400 years ago would make such a claim?[/quote]People that lived 3000 years ago have made claims that we are just discovering today or we just discovered not long ago for example ancient Greek philosophers like Epicurus(he first suggested that every thing consist of indivisible tiny atoms), Pytheas (correctly asserts that tides are related to the phases of the moon),Aristarchus (suggests that the heavenly bodies revolve around the sun and calculated (because of the lack of parallax) that the stars were extrememly far away), Anaximander (was the first recorded person to suggest the Earth is a sphere) and many other. . .This guys lived long before Mohammed and made very powerful suggestions and predictions that they could not have "known" back in the days because they lived very long ago. . .Some of them got into trouble for their line of reasoning and the claims they proposed. . .

Then what are the odds a man like that will make such claim about flies and not rats, bees, spiders, cockroaches etc?
The hadith does not say the prophet said flies carry antibiotics on their backs. . .Here is his claim. . ."IF a fly falls in one's drink, one should reimmerse it again in that drink for one wing of the fly has a disease while the other has a cure". . .The research does not support that claim. . .

And mind you this is an ongoing research which means there is still room for further understanding and modification of the hypothesis, to come close to what the prophet stated some 1400years ago.

Also note that the prophet of Islam did not make this statement as a boast (like hey, come see I know science) it was part of his usual teachings as a mercy to mankind the way he taught us:
Not to drink water while standing
Not to eat with our left hand
Not sleep on our bellies or our backs but on our sides
Not to fill our stomachs with food but just eat enough for sustenance
Not to get angry
Not to walk in one shoe
Not to eat hot food
Not to eat fast
Not to urinate or defecate on the rood or in the shade
Not urinate in a standing water
Not breathe in the cup While drinking water (and I could go on and on)

Bottom line the only way he could make such a claim is either he could see into the future and read the Australian scientists' report OR HE WAS INSPIRED BY THE ALL KNOWING ALL WISE.
What he said is very different from the research findings. . .As i aforementioned other Greek philosophers have made very great claims thousands of years ago before Mohammed, if what you say about the prophet of islam is true then those guys were also inspired by the ancient Greek Gods like Zeus, Apollo etc. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op):
deols: Actually, I expected a more logical line of reasoning. TO counter my points effectively would have been to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Islam did not contribute the above to humanity. Rather you come up to say that others do better or Muslim nations fare worse than others.

It would have been understandable if your questins were on whether Muslims do take these parts of Islam seriously. To what extent they have taken to them and how effective they've been in situations where they have tried them in case of the Islamic banking, laws of inheritance and others like them.
I actually agree with some of what you have written but my objections came when you started using words like, islam came with x idea like you will find no where else or "Islam brings social justice. like you would not find elsewhere" or "how better can it be". . . .Some of what you talked about are not uniquely islamic and have been in existence before islam, others are better practiced in non muslim societies than in islamic societies. . .Saying that islam brings social justice like you will find no where for example is simply not true. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op):
deols: it seems to me like you lack an understanding of exactly what you were asking for. you also have your expectations and already perceived 'non-contributions' that you fail to accept anything contrary to your view. Finally, you failed to actually keep to your tone as you ended up agreeing Islam did make those contributions but just not as you waanted it to be.
Nope, I clearly know and understand what am asking. . .Just wanted vexdacool to tell me specifically the contributions of islam to humanity. . .I do agree that islam has contributed positively and negatively to humanity and that is a FACT. . .I know very well that Islam has contributed to humanity just wanted vexdacool to list them, I just wanted to show him something and prove a point to him. . .I expected him to go about listing achievements of muslims as the contributions of islam which he actually did. . .The contributions of muslims to humanity is very different from the contributions of islam to humanity. . .The contributions of atheist to humanity is very different from the contributions of atheism to humanity. . .I just wanted to show him that he doesn't know what he was talking about when he went about with a litany of nonsense as the contributions of islam. . .I agree with your post because you were the only person that actually posted the contributions of islam, only that you gave it a stretch with words like "Islam brings social justice. like you would not find elsewhere". . . That assertion is simply false and that is what i was out to challenge in your post. . .

you'r right grin
Sure, that's a positive contribution of islam. . .

again, you agreed Islam did contribute this to humanity but can be found elsewhere undecided
It is a contribution non the less but I say it is subjective and not uniquely islamic as the OP says because modest dressing with Hijab(covering the hair or head for women) for example as been in existence long before islam came into the field. . .Jewish women have been dressing like that during the biblical times. . .

You want it judged by your idea of best. WHat exactly does best mean and did u understand my point at all? what bank do you go to with just an idea with no collateral at all.
Islamic banking is a contribution of islam but you made it look as if it is the best system of banking hence my reply. . .

this doesnt change the fact that Zakaat is an Islamic injuction and is specifically something Islam contributes to humanity. As a child,I watched my father put those monies into envelopes to be given to people around. You may not know how that affects their lives. they do. Imagine that everyone capable of doing that does it in the world as a matter of obligation?
Sure,the Jews have a similar system that predates islam, i will accept it as an islamic contribution, i actually wanted contributions that are uniquely islamic. . .

how do i expect you to make sense of this when you have failed as a free thinker. Nothing free about your thoughts on the above, let alone this. Your arrogance will lead you somewhere bad if you dont change wink
Ok. . .

so , you think you start travelling by buying the ticket rather than the thought to/ How may I help you o.
My point is your claims that islam contributed to science is not true, if we are to go by this claim, then most of what we know about science are the contributions of atheistism, judaism, buddhism and christianity since most of the scientific ideas, discoveries and inventions are the handy works of atheist, christians, buddist and jews. . .But that is not the case. . .


Like you are sure of what you are talking about. How are all the above specifically something Islam contributed to their lives? Have you ever tried finding that out?
Your assertion is far from the truth hence my reply. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Wole Soyinka On Traditionalism by mazaje(m): 3:56pm On Mar 25, 2012
LagosShia: the rantings of a confused soul disguising yoruba traditional religion's superstitutions and ignorance for tolerance.ive really never read the words of a man more rude than this soyinka hallucinator.comparing yoruba superstitutions and canibalism to islam.

may be he needs a hair cut for him to think stright!
And islam is what? arabic superstition, legends, mythologies and fantasies?. . .YES. . .
Christianity Etc › Re: Jehovah Witnesses And Blood? by mazaje(m): 2:29pm On Mar 25, 2012
Evil Brain: Don't think you can convince any witnesses to change their beliefs about the blood issue. I'm sure you are aware that they didn't arrive at their current position on blood following any kind of rational thought process. Like in all religions, they believe what they believe because they've been spoonfed by other Jehovah's witnesses. It's pure groupthink.

Personally, I don't care if they accept blood or not. If some JW chooses to die unnecessarily because of his religion, that's his right and his problem. I just want them to stop discouraging others from donating blood so that non-JWs will have a decent chance of surviving when we have accidents, difficult labours or serious illnesses.

The fact is that most JWs I've seen cave in and accept blood when told point-blank that they are, or their child is, going to die without it (I'm a doctor). This is sheer hypocrisy because those same people would have been going around preaching against blood donation and reducing the amount and quality of blood available to everyone else.

When I become president, I'm going to force everyone who publicly opposes blood donation to have "no blood" tattooed to their chest so that everyone will know not to give them blood and shorten everybody else's ration. The anti-blood people get to go to heaven early, and the rest of us get to stay here on earth a bit longer. Everybody wins!
I have seen a JW woman display such hypocrisy on my last visit to Nigeria. . .Her eldest son needed blood transfusion and she caved in and allowed them to do it .She tried to make it a hush hush issue. . .I just laughed at the whole madness. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 2:18pm On Mar 25, 2012
Double post. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 2:18pm On Mar 25, 2012
Sweetnecta: ]It is Islam that gave the whole of the north the spine to talk about political participation, even wanting to be leader of the Nigeria, irrespective of academic achievements of the southern nigerians. What north has is Islam, the reason this person, a muslim southern man can consider them his brothers and sisters over non muslim southern man and woman. After all, I share nothing in common with the north.
The first Prime Minister of Nigeria had no University education while the southern politicians for the most part a University educated in specialized degrees suited for governance; Law, Political science, public policy, public administration, etc.

After the military rule, 1979 ushered in another non University educated president, while people with stellar qualifications had to serve under him; his vice president had Ph. D. and a renown architect. Tell me how is a grade 2 teacher training college man the boss of a Ph. D holder if it was not Islam that encourages him to seek the highest position in the land? Any quality the hausa/fulani axis has in Nigeria, and what hausaa or fulanis have in other african nations is borne on them because of what islam encouraged in man, the same way the arabs did not sit back immediately Islam of Muhammas [as] woke them from the slumber of abject poverty. They capture the persians in n time and turned them to psedo-arabs. Even Islam took over hausa/Fulani of Nigeria and many of you disbelievers even sa "Walahi" when you want people to accept that you are honest. Is walahi a hausa word? The futa jalon people "Fulanis" know that it is arabic; and if you doubt me, ask your ancestors in Mauritania; they have their fula or Polur language and "Walahi" is not part of it.

It is arrogance of slave that we make the owner number/cunt him [A yoruba adage that the ignorant man need to ask yoruba people who have time for him to explain].
If we go by this ridiculous analogy of your then Christianity is what made Obasanjo and GEJ the rulers of Nigeria. If we are to go by your drivel, then islam is what is responsible for the very high rate of poverty in the north among the hausa/fulanis. . .The issue of Almajiranci is an islamic contribution. . .It is destroying the hausa/fulani people. . .
Islam › Re: What Specifically Has Islam Contributed To Humanity As A Race. . . by mazaje(op): 1:50pm On Mar 25, 2012
seguun: [b][/b] At least you admitted flies do carry antibiotic materials, what you are only disputing is whether it is located on the wings or on the surface...I ask you is one of its wings located in its belly?
Also you forgot to add that it now established that by dipping the fly in the drink, the disease in the drink can be cured:
False. . . .Dipping a fly in ethanol and running it true a filter can extract the antibiotics that needs to be chemically synthesized first not in the drink it fell inside, dropping a fly inside a drink will only contaminate the drink the more, it is an ongoing research according to the paper i read some few years ago. . .


Wings of a Fly: The New Buzz of Antibiotics

  Written By:  Mona Al-Raqas ( Yemen Post Staff )
  Article Date: December 17, 2007 

 

The last thing that might come to mind is that we can find antibiotics on the surface of flies.  over a thousand years ago, Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him) said: "If a fly falls down to your vessel, drown it then remove it, for one of its wings has the ailment and the other has the cure," [narrated by Al-Bokhari] Through this Hadith, it has been clear that a fly has bacteria in one of its wings and has the antibacterial defense in the other wing.



People of other religions found it somehow strange and difficult to believe that Muslims drown the fly into their food as they considered it something unacceptable. They believed that flies carry only diseases, and drowning it into food or drink is an unreasonable action. Although flies live on decayed food and garbage where bacteria, germs and microbes exist, Allah made the miracle on the right wing of the fly. He, the Almighty, creates the antibiotics that help annihilating all these viruses.  

In Australia, a team from the Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, worked on a research to prove that flies have remarkable antimicrobial defenses. The team's leader, Dr. Joanne Clarke proved this discovery through a number of experiments.

"Our research is a small part of a global research effort for new antibiotics, but we are looking where we believe no-one has looked before,” said Dr. Clarke, who presented the team’s findings at the Australian Society for Microbiological Conference in Melbourne.

She added, "We are now trying to identify the specific antibacterial compounds which will be chemically synthesized from the surface of the flies."

Another researcher from Tokyo University, Dr. Juan Alvarez Bravo confirms that in the near future "people will be astonished to find that flies are being used as antibiotics in the hospitals."

He also assures that scientists are working on the flies to get a number of effective remedies for different diseases. 

Working on this theory, scientists found that getting the remedy from flies is strange but acceptable in science. Other researchers from the United States are trying to find anti-pathogenetic ways from the flies. They also note that having the cure from the flies will be something reasonably acceptable by people the coming few years.

Researchers from Auburn University discovered a kind of protein in the saliva of the fly with ability to help recover wounds and cracked skin. Likewise, researchers from Stanford University discovered a fly substance with ability to strengthen the immunity system in human beings.

According to scientists, there is a big similarity between the heart of a fly and that of a human being, prompting them to use flies to produce a medicament for the human heart diseases.  

Again, many scientists agree that flies carry lots of diseases but never get infected because of the antimicrobial defenses found in one of their wings. 

A laboratory technician Dr. Abdulhakim al- Qobati pointed out that "this is a heavenly miracle from Allah the Almighty to put the disease and the cure in a tiny creature such as the fly."

He also clarified that the fly is a simple way to transfer diseases due to the environment that the fly used to live in. Allah Creates both the remedy and the disease in the two wings of this fly to show His Supreme Power, explained al-Qobati.

When a fly has various harmful bacteria, it needs something defensible to continue its survival and that is why Allah creates the antibacterial supplies in its body.  A fly puts its saliva into food as soon as it touches it. The fly makes some movements by its limbs from its head to its mouth to put the bacteria. Through these movements, it transfers the microbes and germs to food.    

Researches and scientists proved that in the flies' stomach there are some parasites in the form of circular cells. These cells contain of a specific enzyme. In no time, those cells spread out to the surface of the fly through the joints of its stomach. Due to an inner pressure of each cell (caused for example by drowning the fly), it explodes and results its contents in a form of a liquid spray of this enzyme which has strong properties and abilities to dissolve all microbes. By drowning the fly, the inner pressure of the cell is occurred, so the enzyme will come out and kill all the bacteria caused by the fly and this is why Islam demands drowning the fly.

The discoveries of modern researches have been revealed in the Holy Qura'n long ago, "O men! Here is a parable set forth! Listen to it! Those on whom, besides Allah, ye call, cannot create (even) a fly, if they all met together for the purpose! And if the fly should snatch away anything from them, they would have no power to realize it from the fly. Feeble are those who petition and those whom they petition!” [Sura al-Haj, verse 73]

Hundred thousands of flies' types exist in the universe; however, just ten types share us living in our houses. The female fly lays down more than hundred eggs in the dung of some animals or in the garbage. After one day, the larva comes out and feeds by the surrounding environment. Two weeks later, they become full-grown flies. In four generations, one fly can lay down 1.5 million eggs, but fortunately, the majority dies due to weather circumstances or becomes food for birds and other insects.  Maximally, a fly can live for sixty days.
www.yemenpost.net/8/Health/2.htm - 14k -
This news paper report from the Yemenpost is very misleading and contains some misinformation. . .They report talks about a muslim laboratory technician who says that scientist generally agree that flies carry antimicrobial defenses on one of their wings. . .This statement is very false, there is no scientific research that agrees with his statements. . .

Here is the paper. . .Compare it to the sensational report in the Yemenpost and see for your self. . .

The surface of flies is the last place you would expect to find antibiotics, yet that is exactly where a team of Australian researchers is concentrating their efforts.

Working on the theory that flies must have remarkable antimicrobial defences to survive rotting dung, meat and fruit, the team at the Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, set out to identify those antibacterial properties manifesting at different stages of a fly's development.

"Our research is a small part of a global research effort for new antibiotics, but we are looking where we believe no-one has looked before," said Ms Joanne Clarke, who presented the group's findings at the Australian Society for Microbiology Conference in Melbourne this week. The project is part of her PhD thesis.

The scientists tested four different species of fly: a house fly, a sheep blowfly, a vinegar fruit fly and the control, a Queensland fruit fly which lays its eggs in fresh fruit. These larvae do not need as much antibacterial compound because they do not come into contact with as much bacteria.

Flies go through the life stages of larvae and pupae before becoming adults. In the pupae stage, the fly is encased in a protective casing and does not feed. "We predicted they would not produce many antibiotics," said Ms Clarke.

They did not. However the larvae all showed antibacterial properties (except that of the Queensland fruit fly control).

As did all the adult fly species, including the Queensland fruit fly (which at this point requires antibacterial protection because it has contact with other flies and is mobile).

Such properties were present on the fly surface in all four species, although antibacterial properties occur in the gut as well. "You find activity in both places," said Ms Clarke.

"The reason we concentrated on the surface is because it is a simpler extraction."

The antibiotic material is extracted by drowning the flies in ethanol, then running the mixture through a filter to obtain the crude extract.

When this was placed in a solution with various bacteria including E.coli, Golden Staph, Candida (a yeast) and a common hospital pathogen, antibiotic action was observed every time.

"We are now trying to identify the specific antibacterial compounds," said Ms Clarke. Ultimately these will be chemically synthesised.

Because the compounds are not from bacteria, any genes conferring resistance to them may not be as easily transferred into pathogens. It is hoped this new form of antibiotics will have a longer effective therapeutic life.


http://abc.gov.au/science/articles/2002/10/01/689400.htm
Flies do not carry diseases on their wings, they carry diseases on their legs and their saliva and one of their wings does not carry any cure. . .Dipping a fly inside a drink when it falls into it is a useless exercise. . .

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 (of 290 pages)