₦airaland Forum

virgoquin:
They are so fûcking hot!

Ellatee256:
Hi everyone,
I'm 23 yrs and currently running my HND program.
I have a bf and we have been dating for almost a year.

We do almost everything together and we see each other every single day...
But now am irritated by him.

He comes to my hostel from his office everyday but now seeing him irritates me the more.
I just want a break but I don't want to hurt him.
This isn't the first time its happening to me,
I've had two boyfriends before I met my new bf and same thing happened with them.

Its just like I meet a guy I like..,we love each other and I get excited and then few months later I get irritated by them....

I told my elder sis about it and she dragged me to church saying I have spiritual problems but that's not the issue....

Sometimes I just want my time alone but my bf doesn't seem to understand that.
Have tried to ignore him and all but he doesn't get the message am passing........
He wants me to meet his mum but have been giving him excuses....

I don't know why I feel like this with only the guys I date cuz I don't feel that way with my friends and family in fact I want to be with them everyday but its different in my relationships...
I want to end things with my boyfriend without hurting him cuz I can't keep acting and I can't keep wasting his time.

I think I have a problem and I don't know what to do.
I don't want this to affect me when I get married cuz there won't be a break in marriage...
Pls kindly advice
Thanks

martowskin1:
, my comment didnt support flinging ur breast out side to feed ur baby,

i once watched a preceding session in a senate house of one of the European nation, the image is attached bellow, this lady is a lawmaker, wife and mother from a civilized nation. look what she did to her baby and the breast is not in public.

nigeria woman will look for house help, or take the baby to day care... because she can afford it as a senior citizen... how will a child brought in day care or by house help even have sense

she didnt put breast milk in the bottle to feed her baby, i wonder where u modern ladies in nigeria are learning this rubbish from... like i said, is the reason we have so many idiots this generation

sisisioge:
Because we are deeply discriminative of other tribes while in our home country. It goes as far back as several generations. Fixing it now will require a lot of work across several generations. By the time we have it sorted, our generation to the 4th generation to come would have been long gone.

If I dare bring an Igbo bobo home, my father won't bother coming for the wedding . But once I leave this country, I'm free to marry whoever I please. Isn't that grossly funny? Well, it is what it is.

Take NL intertribal wars for example, those people actually do hate one another. If you take the time to read between the lines, you would realize just how much. It is well fa.

budaatum:
I somehow doubt you know about evolution or read any Darwin missjo and how science works, or you would not be refering to it as "mumbo jumbo", nor would you describe evolution as "creating itself".

But, that's ok. You think what suits you.

herakles:
should I say this is ignorance?! interpret the Bible literally at your own peril! you will only stumble and be derailed from the truth

Tallesty1:
Bobrisky changed his gender because he saw that being a man isn't easy.


I love feminists of today sha.




FEMINISTS: Men are scum, men are pigs, men are USELESS etc


Now the sweet part.


FEMINISTS: Women are equal to men.

budaatum:
There is no evidence that I can give you missjo that you can not find out for yourself, everyone knows in their own heart how much evidence they themselves have witnessed or studied or know of. But I am an advocate of evolution, the gradual coming into being over time. A thread has been provided with very useful contributions if you don't mind digging through our usual nairaland bad behaviour.

Warning, understand!

Evolution 101

Magnoliaa:
How? C-section?

zangaozanga:
so you see nothing wrong with this?

1shortblackboy:
do u understand English?

jerflakes:
But it's not a man

And this is still sexual abuse

So what's your point?

nairalandposter:
Nigerians adapt better (perhaps) to half Nigerian half non Nigerian mixes than they do intertribal Nigerian ancestry.

Meaning they aren't likely disturb you as much if your mixture is part Nigerian part non Nigerian. Speaking of a black/African context generally.


People who do not approve of Nigerian intertribal mixtures, can voice their opinion on this thread, I'm very interested.

sisisioge:
Overall, I think its best for us not to bother mixing tribe even though its unpatriotic to discriminate. May God help us.

Pathokpo:
I need help seriously to something that has been bothering me for a long time now. I am an extreme introvert that can't start or hold a conversation with anybody. Where ever I go I always see my self as a misfit due to my inability to communicate reasonably with people and this normally scares people away from me. Most people think I am a snub but the problem is that I find it very to communicate effectively. I think right now it has gotten worse and my self esteem has been affected drastically and it has also affected me mentally. Even at the place where I work everyone now ignores me and think that I am not mentally conscious. I no longer feel happy and safe with my job and life in general. Right now I feel like giving up with life because this kind of life is not worth living.

nairalandposter:
It's about intermixing between two different Nigerian tribes.

Some people don't like that, their opinion is as valid as any other, I don't feel they should not be allowed to voice their objections.

Are you Nigerian?

sweetmelanin:
Not the case at all.
We got married young and both in our late 20s now... truth is we've always had a friendship/ brother-sister type relationship.
For a while I struggled with the low frequency of sex but we eventually both just settled into this lifestyle. We both work very hard and are high achievers and have built a wonderful life together... sex is the only thing lacking.

budaatum:
You seem to think it is literally and historically true.
https://www.nairaland.com/4960881/garden-eden-childs-view#74770060


Don't mention me with that fool again.

Ihedinobi3:
I'm afraid I don't see this difference you mean. Adam's eating of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was indeed disobedience to God, since the act violated God's Will. The same is true of Cain's murder of Abel. Both are disobedience, and both are sin. But I believe you are pointing out the difference in seriousness or degree, that would make sense. Eating a fruit against God's Will is a sin punishable by the Lake of Fire as much as murder is, but murder is a more wicked sin, obviously.

My point, however, is that the biblical position is that whatever may be considered sin or evil came into the world through Adam's disobedience. Of course, each of Adam's descendants has gone on to disobey in a way that is perhaps unique to them, with someone like Cain turning to murder, and Nimrod using politics to try to wipe out Faith in the Lord later on. But it is all sin, it is all evil, it is all rebellion. And it all has its roots in the sin nature that we acquired from Adam.

About Nimrod, I also don't quite see what you say in the Bible. The Scripture seems rather unmistakable about the fact that it was the whole world that united in the matter of Babel. Otherwise, who did God turn into nations? If it was only Ham's descendants who fomented that rebellion, are they the only ones that God created the nations out of? In fact, Genesis 10:32 and 11:1 stoutly refutes this. It was the whole world that rebelled, and they were the ones out of whom the Lord separated out the nations to prevent such madness until the time of the Antichrist.

As for the Council of Jamnia, I'm not sure what your argument here might be, but it seems clear to me that nobody could possibly decide what is Scripture and what is not. If they could, well, how on earth could anyone be sure what God is saying and what He is not? Scripture identifies itself. Not only does the Bible teach that, but it makes sense that it should. In fact, I thought that you might be saying that, so my comment was to support you and strengthen your argument, but perhaps I was wrong.

Magnoliaa:
Yes, it's beautiful in that sense. I agree.

But you can't have the baby without the pain lol

Honestly, it's scary...I'm not looking forward to it.

jibrilELsudan:
Lol am serious. The rhema just came upon me. Am still shaking and in tears.

cococandy:
I have this phone. It’s not a big deal.

Really buy what you can afford

jibrilELsudan:
Am not trolling joking. I received the rhema revelation on this.

Magnoliaa:
Okay. Learnt something here.

I just want to add - you concluded in the last sentence that personal experiences and prejudices are just that, nothing more - that doesn't invalidate or make them less true or real (in the world).

Ihedinobi3:
Hello

1. You are right that there was no allegory going on in Genesis. It is also true that all living creatures fed on the trees and herbage in the Garden. There was no meat-eating authorized by the Lord until after the Flood (Genesis 9:3).

2. We all acquired a sin nature through Adam, not through Cain or through Ham. When Adam chose to rebel against God along with his wife, his flesh was corrupted. He was cursed with passing down that corruption to his descendants. Everyone born of male seed has the same corruption in their flesh (Romans 5:12). This is why the Savior Jesus Christ had to be born by a virgin without the involvement of any male agency.

Again, there was evil in the world right from the time that Adam sinned.

Also, the people who rebelled in the issue of Babel was not just Ham's descendants. It was everyone with the exception of a few believers who are not named (Genesis 11:1-9). It is true that the one who spearheaded that rebellion was Ham's grandson Nimrod, but it wasn't only his grandfather's line that joined him. The entire world then cooperated with him. That was why the Lord created the nations, to prevent such cooperation again until the time would be right for it at the Tribulation.

3. I lack the context of your submission about the apocryphal writings, but I can tell you that there is NO complete collection of them, on account of the fact that there are so many that it is simply impossible to collect them all. As for how the books in the Bible were selected, Scripture has a distinctive quality: it is basically alive. No one who has ever honestly read Scripture could miss its vitality. It is inspired. No other literature is. One may feel the emotion of a writer in some piece that they wrote. Homer can be captivating, for example, although it was written so many years ago. But Scripture is not merely emotionally captivating. It is alive. It is probably impossible to explain it any better.

However, it is the presence of that life in it that makes it unmistakable. So, it basically self-selects into the Canon. In other words, there has never been a council whether of Jewish rabbis or of Roman Catholic bishops that selected what belongs in the Canon of the Bible and what doesn't. That such councils existed is not being disputed. That they actually created a true Canon is a fantastic lie. They may have created a Canon that suited their own purposes, but nobody ever put the Bible together. The Bible self-selects. You can see proof of this in Peter's words about Paul's writings:

[15]and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you,
[16]as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.
2 Peter 3:15-16 NASB

Clearly, Peter recognized Paul's writings at the time that he wrote them as Scripture. There was no council telling him or anybody else then that Paul's writings were Scripture. The first such council occurred at least a couple hundred years later.