₦airaland Forum

BRATISLAVA:
But a woman should tolerate a man from several crashed marriages/relationships when it is obvious he is the problem? His ex is at as much liberty, yet he's whining about.

You people want rules for women, and none for yourselves.

Every time "peace of mind" this, "peace of mind" that: do you, a man, give peace of mind to the woman in your life the way you demand it from her? Are you well mannered the way you expect her to be? Or is she barely tolerating you? Are you the only ones who deserve it?

The way you create so many red flags and want women to ignore yours is getting old. Are you God? You aren't the only ones who want perfect partners(if your fantasy exists at all), women do, too. How many men are good partners, when rather than dealing with their issues they are constantly pointing at women? Every woman is waking up to these manipulations by men, who try to focus so much on women while their characters, attitudes and lifestyles are nothing worth marrying. Who wants to marry a bad man?

And if you want to be married by women, sit and wait for them to come and woo you so that they will have rights over you. That way you will have nothing to brag about as if the world owes you so much because you were born male, proposed and married a woman, something that has been on since the days of Methuselah.

BRATISLAVA:
She has a crashed marriage, but Gentry has 3 crashed marriages.

What does that tell you about an irresponsible man that can't stay seated in one place? Should we call him a bitch or a ehore or a prostitute? Because those are the only people that can't keep in a marriage, right? The man has deep issues. It's not everything that is the fault of women.

Men will always remarry at lightning speed, because they're usually whores. Cheating is something they've always entertained, and society encourages them. Not because they are good.

Midas01:
Very stupid.

Bellfun:
Good for the Akara woman!

But when her N100 akara and pap starts getting smaller and smaller..cos she knows a G-boy(who does not care about price and quantity) is coming to buy...what would happen to other regular customers?

Tapout:
He should have had a clearance atlest, you can't be moving about with such items in a civilized society without appropriate clearance or pass. Lets stop being too sentimental in this country abeg.

daddytime:
Lol

Chelsea don sign new midfielder....

Lukaku don suffer.

Up Blues

Bellfun:
Very true!

Not only for businesses.. But also for other individuals!

House rent is now on the rise cos of these guys(they can pay millions for accommodation) and the greedy landlords expect all other tenants to pay up too(not minding the fact that people don't have the financial muscle to compete with G boys).

Bellfun:
Very true!

Not only for businesses.. But also for other individuals!

House rent is now on the rise cos of these guys(they can pay millions for accommodation) and the greedy landlords expect all other tenants to pay up too(not minding the fact that people don't have the financial muscle to compete with G boys).

Joysticks:
But she is not the one that won the previous bb9ja.How come she now owns a mansion?Is it the same for other guys?

Tigiliigu:
What could be responsible for this?

MsFaith:
At the 2nd bolded, you are talking in the nonsense, don't men defend their gender when verbally attacked by women?

At over 30, you are still reasoning like this? mehn, you need to re-orientate yourself.

Emancipate yourself from this mentality.


Defend for mouth but enemy of themselves. Even if men defend themselves, they would relate well to deliberate and find the wrongs. But woman? No.

Once the mood swing enters and her current emotion as an emotional being makes her defend her gender on anything, it's final, she can't reconsider her stand on the matter again.

MsFaith:
At the 2nd bolded, you are talking in the nonsense, don't men defend their gender when verbally attacked by women?

At over 30, you are still reasoning like this? mehn, you need to re-orientate yourself.

Emancipate yourself from this mentality.

Defend for mouth but enemy of themselves. Even if men defend themselves, they would relate well to deliberate and find the wrongs. But woman? No.

Once the mood swing enters and her current emotion as an emotional being makes her defend her gender on anything, it's final, she can't reconsider her stand on the matter again.

MsFaith:
At the 2nd bolded, you are talking in the nonsense, don't men defend their gender when verbally attacked by women?

At over 30, you are still reasoning like this? mehn, you need to re-orientate yourself.

Emancipate yourself from this mentality.

Defend for mouth but enemy of themselves. Even if men defend themselves, they would relate well to deliberate and find the wrongs. But woman? No. Once the mood swing enters and her current emotion as an emotional being makes her defend her gender on anything, it's final, she can't reconsider her stand on the matter again.

Kokaine:
Alhamdullilah. Tell my brother sodeeq that he is making us proud by his behavior. May Allah reward him and you.

greenie77:
Those that get into fights at football viewing centres, drinking joints, cultists spilling blood etc are all women, I guess.

Kokaine:
I must confess that it was a very nice time discussing with you. If I have the opportunity of doing business with you or furthering communications in any way that would benefit our collective welfare whether socially or economically, I wouldn't resist it.

I am an electrical engineer, I run an electrical company in the North, i deal on solar installations and home automation devices using microcontroller programming. And I am with a government parastatal that deals with agriculture.

If you ever find any need for my assistance in any of these aspects in life, kindly feel free to reach out to me. I will be willing to avail you with any information whatsoever you may find useful.

And if you have relatives seeking opportunities or trainings and mentorship in my competencies, I wouldn't mind rendering any assistance possible as long as they exist. This is how we build connections and prepare a soft landing spot for our kids in this country. Not jumping at each others throats in ignorance because of differences in religion or tribes. We are always going to find people different from us, civility is how we tolerate and coexist with each other despite these differences. In the end, judgement is for Allah alone and not for us.


We are all brothers. We all came from two people Adam and Eve. We are not out as Muslims to harm anyone. We are actually very good people. We are the most hospitable and trust worthy people on earth who keep promises and take truth and justice seriously. We are not what the media says of us. If you meet true practicing muslims, you would never want to depart from them. Especially those who have knowledge. Or do you want to tell me that a boko haram fighter knows these things I shared here? He probably doesn't even know the meaning of a single word in Arabic. He's just reciting them but cannot even interpret what he's saying. They're illiterates. Poverty stricken and frustrated people. We can't judge a religion by their acts. The same religion that has a department in Harvard law school for brilliant people. You can see how the ideology is dead on arrival

Rosullulah (saw) accomodated a group of christain travellers who were stranded. He accommodated them in the mosque! And gave them a place to pray. This is something you may never hear. He was so trustworthy that some enemies used to store their weapons with the Muslims. A true Muslim never betrays or changes his promise. Unfortunately the people saying the most about him are the Ones who know the least. While those who know the most are shy or ashamed to speak up because if public opinions.


Some of us may have given you reasons to doubt this, I really apologise and it affects us badly too to be misjudged and misunderstood because of these people. We do wish that smart people like you can always easily discern what actions amounts to islam by illiterates and the ones that are the true definition of our religion. The saelme way I regard news of pastors doing or saying those things I have never imagined my Catholic friends do. In fact it was the Catholic friend who trained me on solar installations. He gave me my first car too. And I lived under his roof at some point in life. So you can see how easy it will be for me to discern a true Christian from another.

I would want to share with you that there is a current opportunity by the federal government for graduates who want to be trained for a period of 12 months. It is championed by the vice president. He is a person of integrity so the process is transparent. Kindly assist people you know in need of this opportunity register. It is NIGERIA JUBILEE FELLOWS PROGRAM. the site is https://www.njfp.ng/apply. If you own a company, you can also register and people will be posted to you for training. You will be paid and they will be paid. I hear its between 85k to 100k per person I don't know how true. But the last survival fund was 50k per person.

As opportunities arise, InshaAllah I will share with you and I would not hold back any useful information.

I am grateful for your maturity and civility once again. I can be reached via email: greenfaces2000@yahoo.com
Thanks again

cococandy:
You sound very young. I hope you put pride away and learn.
You have a bigger chance of getting seriously hurt, injured or killed by another man than at the hands of a woman.

Kobojunkie:
1. The "apple" in the garden was from the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil. That fruit belonged to God and was written of as a good tree. Even when Eve and then Adam ate from it, the fruit remained just as good as it was before it was plucked. So how can you label it a tool of rebellion against God?

And by the way, you still haven't made clear what this supposed God's social order you keep alluding to really is.

2. Whose idea is this gender role of women? Men's?

3. But God didn't allude to Eve being used to challenge Him in any way. Instead, the blame for that lay squarely on the serpent who usurped God's place by stepping between His command and His creation.

Instead Eve's punishment was for her disobedience of God's law in Genesis 2 vs 15 - 17 , the very same law Adam was found guilty of and condemned for. So, why do you make it seem as though Eve's fault was oj some way greater than that of Adam's ?

4. How can I have reservations about claims that I don't even begin to understand or know the source of?

greenie77:
They run with the fallacy that being in touch with one's feelings is weakness, not realizing the danger of being numb to emotions.

They keep pushing the narrative that women are a woman's worst enemy but it is a worldwide record that men are murdered -- usually by other men.....women being "emotional beings", how often do we read they murdered their fellow women in comparison to the "logical beings"?

cococandy:
Pride
Happiness
Contempt
Joy
Rage
Anger
Sadness
Lust
Greed
Jealousy
Covetousness
Fear

All of these are examples of emotions that men display everyday. Sometimes in destructive ways that hurt anyone who happens to be nearby. Yet let a woman show empathy or compassion or sadness in any given situation, then all women are emotional but men are not.

Y’all’s lack of emotional awareness is deeply troubling. The fact that this statement is something that the lot of you regurgitate from one to another without thought is even more worrisome. Do you think about what you say before you say it?

Do you have any original thought of your own?

I would advice you to try and feel your feelings. Just to be in tune with your inner self. An emotionless person is a deficit person. It’s nothing to brag about.

Kobojunkie:
1. Instead of truth, what you wrote is more your opinion of the movement and we are each allowed our opinions at least. Hence there is not much I can say to it.

2. What gender roles are you alluding to?

3. Eve challenged God or the serpent challenged God? We have written in Genesis 3 vs 11 - 19, in God's own Word, who was guilty of what and there is no charge against Eve suggesting she challenged God, so where do you get this idea from?

4. I didn't ask you your own questions. Instead I questioned the claims you made.

Kobojunkie:
1. I know what it means to to logical.... what I dont understand is how you reached your conclusions that men are logical whereas the females are emotional beings... both unsubstantiated claims by the way.

2. You site the case of the ritualistic suggesting it is blind to argue that there are also numerous cases of men deceived by ritualists, why is that?

So, because this particular ritualist claims women are easily decieved, you believe him? How do you know you have not then been decieved by him?

3. So now you admit that separation is after all not illogical, a claim you originally made yourself.

As for separation as an only option, I don't recall ever saying that. Again, what I wrote was...

Kobojunkie:
1. Well, it is what you think, ok.

2. When you speak of the maintaining of gender differences by God, what arrangement do you suggest God made to this end?

3. As for challenging God's arrangement, what exactly are you suggesting happened in the Garden of Eden to this end?

4. Questions are in fact the best way to gain better understanding of an opponents line of reasoning in a conversation such as this one here. You claim to be the logical being and you didn't know this?

Kobojunkie:
1. Men are logical beings? Yet another unsubstantiated claim..

2. Give me an example of one of these situations you keep accusing women of getting themselves in because of their emotions , so I can better follow this your line of reasoning abeg....

3. So, two friends deciding to go their separate ways is not a logical solution to a situation where two egos are unwilling to bend?

Kobojunkie:
You are still not being coherent at all..

1. Cheated by what nature? Who exactly told you nature did any cheating here and what has nature to do with women and this feeling less of themselves you claim.

2. First you roped God in to this but never got around to explaining exactly what it is that you claim God did and how it resulted in that which you continue to claim. Now you want to rope the devil too into this, why?

3. You are not making any sense at all is why I am trying to understand the rationale behind your baseless, for lack of a better word, tirade.

Why not reel this in and attempt a direct answer to at least one of the questions I have posed to help me maybe see where you are even coming from with any of this.

Why am I still asking? I have time to kill.

Kobojunkie:
How exactly do you deal with them as emotional beings?

Women put themselves in situations because of lack of control of their own emotions in their union with a man?

Women don't get along with women because of lack of control of their emotions, so when men don't get along with each other what is the reason for that?

Since you keep alluding to it, here goes! So, every problem on this earth has a solution no matter who is at fault.. so when friends decide to go their separate ways after realizing they no longer have anything left between themselves, that is not a solution in of itself?

Kobojunkie:
So, did God who created both women and men, somewhere state that that which is influenced by emotions is inferior or of lesser value to that which is not and hence both ought not to be treated equally?

I am trying to find the link between your claim and any of the questions I asked or even this here topic.

Kobojunkie:
forming strong to carry the burden of the children alone? So when a woman is left alone to fend for her kids... she is wrong to buck up and ensure her cobs are not mowed over by the world?

Sounds a lot like you harbor quite a lot of bitterness against them yourself. Are you certain you are not here projecting as that is what it seems more like here.

You are told the women in question fight for their children to be accepted, yet rather than consider that, you lampoon her indeed for being, according to you, "used and dumped".

Kobojunkie:
Please expand on this thought of yours.

So God created a man with different reproductive structures than that of a woman. How does this translate to meaning woman folk should not be treated equally in family and society as men?

Kobojunkie:
Please expand on this thought of yours.

So God created a man with different reproductive structures than that of a woman. How does this translate to meaning woman folk should not be treated equally in family and society as men?

Deo1986:
I grew up in a community, i saw them come back home with children in tow. I saw them fight fathers, brothers, relatives, friends. Just for their children to have a place, and be accepted.