₦airaland Forum

LordReed:
Yeah like when you were crying to budaatum on the other thread right. LMFAO!

He in that thread put a restraining order on me, literally tied up my hands and so left me at a disadvantage at squaring up to you, so I reached out to him, to rein you in, else katakata go burst. I am pleased to see you've got your LMFAO! mojo back

LordReed:
Then don't cry when your toes bleed.

My toes dont bleed. No toe bleed, no cry.

LordReed:
And I answered you without rancor but you threw it in my face.
I have said my own, bring your best dancing shoes if you want to tango mate.

When, how and where did I throw "it" in your face?
I dont need shoes before I can dance, but if you're desperately spoiling for one. Bring it on

LordReed:
That's your fücking business but when you come into my space be ready to dance.

There is and was nothing wrong in what I said in my comment

Reiterating, this is a public forum open to public expressions which allows posting unsolicited comments anywhere that takes anybody's fancy, without being policed, intimidated, bullied, cast aspersions at, without being belittled, without being called insulting or rude names etcetera.

LordReed:
Believe me if I want to throw shade at you it won't be subtle. If you knew the information why were you forming spokesperson for someone I asked a clarifying question to? Shouldn't have realised any I was asking the question?

Let's get this right homie, you dont dictate to me which neighbour or not, I decide to form spokesperson for. Capisce?

frosbel2:
Yep.

I have heard countless stories of these 'greater works ' but never seen ONE, literally NONE, ZILCH. These guys are jokers, albeit many are ignorant.

You must have been living under a stone to have never seen, read or heard of any.
The joke is you matey, the joke is on you and you're right there, at the top, among and with the most ignorant.

LordReed:
Yeah you wrote the information was unsolicited and unnecessary when the question wasn't for you. Why the fück are you disturbing me if you don't want unsolicited information?

You wrote:
"By now you should realise there is difference between belief and knowledge
See chart below for more clarity."

At which I clamped down on your subtle thrown shade with:
"You are not proving anything with information like this to me, like as if I didnt know about all those 4 unsolicited & unnecessary information before."

This is a public forum open to public expressions which allows posting unsolicited comments anywhere that takes anybody's fancy, without being policed, intimidated, bullied, cast aspersions at, without being belittled, without being called insulting or rude names etcetera.

LordReed:
Yes writing "don't be daft" is good banter. When next you want banter use such a term and then let's watch your tears flow.

I wonder what the comments were before I told you not to be daft because of you trying to be intimidating and bossing around, like after the subtle shade of telling me to kindly buzz off

Tears may flow in the night, but joy comes in the morning. Tears of joy, ah what a bliss.

I can give back same measure given to me, give it back pressed down and running over. Bud' is not in here, to save bacon's.

Michellekabod:
My dear i will disagree with you. The woman was healed based on her faith and not reasoning or testing.

1/ Are you saying she obtained her healing based only on her faith?
2/ Michellekabod are you saying her study, reasoning, experiences, testing et al had no part in her planning to touch the hem of Jesus' garment for healing?
3/ Do you really believe that faith works without works?

Michellekabod:
Many, but for now i recall one.
When Jesus was talking about the end of the world to his disciples he said that some people alive in that generation will not die until his words have come to pass. Many generations have come and go after them and Jesus is not still back.
I cant accept what he said if what he meant by his coming was not the physically appearing in the sky.

Thank you for obliging me with at least one. I must admit this choice must have been decided by fate.

If it is the passage I think you are referring to with your observation, then with all due respects, I am trying so hard to understand why and how you have managed to misinterprete singular generation to mean plural generations because if it is the same bible passage then what Jesus prophesised, did happen in AD 70, the temple was completely destroyed, razed to the ground leaving no stone unturned. It happened within 40 years, a generation is 40 years according to Jewish custom

Michellekabod:
Who are these ambassadors and what myths are you referring to here?
Envangelists, pastors et al...
You know of zeus, hades and poseidon as greek mythology right?
Permit me to say the virgin birth, cruxification and ascension are also myths but by the romans except proven otherwise)

Well evangelists, pastors et al.. are gifts and roles for doing things, they are no more ambassadors than any other believer

Lets take them one after the other, but for now because of time, pick out virgin birth first
1/ What is mythical about the virgin birth of Jesus?
2/ Yes, there are supposedly virgin births, and actually even before the Romans, but can you list examples of two or three you know of?
3/ What form of virgin birth are each of what you've mentioned in #2 above?

I'll like to skip hades because as you've rightly pointed out and seem to know, hades is a greek concept. Hades is actually for Greek the god of the underworld, and the name the Greeks have for the dwelling place of their dead. Sheol is more right up the Jewish's alley.

Its not today, it started. There is nothing wrong with borrowed technology. The bible is littered with borrowed technology. I know you're smart and clever enough to link and join dots to see an emerged picture

Michellekabod:
They claim from God and for God

You really need to tell, in your own words, and exhaustively what you would or have perceived God and god to be.
Dont pull punches, give it your best shot, pretend like as if your life depended on it

I'll prefer you provide illustrations or examples too of what you've described God and god to be. Thank you in advance.

Michellekabod:
Sometimes we need words or phrases to define ourselves....it could take a long time typing who i am but agnostic theist summed it all.

With the greatest respect, I beg to disagree that sometimes we need words or phrases to define ourselves based on the premise you saying this being due to the long time it'll take to say who you are

Dont let other people's opinion define you. That is one of the core initial mistakes of christians
If only more christians properly read the bible, there'll be less christians.

Michellekabod:
My stance on religion is not the outcome of the disturbed set of humans called christians....nah.christians are to look up to jesus right? not others

I am pleased to read this comment but I am intrigued to find out what really you about what pure and true religion that is faultless is.
Remember sports like football, hockey are religions even fashion to some too is a religion

Michellekabod:
Study, reasoning, experiences, testing et al are responsible.

This is absolutely true.
Remember the woman who touched the tassel of Jesus' robe, saying to herself "if I shall touch the hem of His garment, I shall be made whole". It is a marriage of her study, reasoning, experiences, testing et al that was responsible for her receiving an answer to that her long standing problem.

Michellekabod:
When you find out the myth paraded as fact has many contradictions you begin to wonder and question and doubt. You want to study, read, evaluate, merge two in two and realise things dont add up....

Oftentimes what seemingly are thought to be contradictions, arent at all contradictions. Whenever you think you're facing a contradiction, do the Berean angle like you've mentioned to check your premise.

I'll be very intrigued if you can list what you've realised dont add up. I must admit and warn you though, that sometimes 1+1 doesnt equal 2

Michellekabod:
The ambassadors of this myth dont make things any better. Their life potrays the opposite of what their holy book claims they should be so you shoo off what ever they have to say as gibberish (which they are)...

Who are these ambassadors and what myths are you referring to here?
Where are these ambassadors sent from, who are they representing?

LordReed:
I don't give a shït what you think I should be like.
You always seek an opportunity to sneak in insults and jabs then start crying when the heat is on.
If you cannot comment without that then don't bother replying to me unless you want your tears to flow.

I dont want or need you to give any shït.

I dont sneak insults nor jabs, neither do I start to cry whenever your imaginary heat is on.

Please show me where and when I sneaked insults and jabs at you. If you cant show where, if you are unable to produce anything, then please, retract your false accusations and tender public apologies accordingly

When we are each enjoying having a right good old banter, you suddenly choose to toss all the play pieces off the table and then get on it, to start shïtting on the table and strutting around like one of our prized feathered friends

I give as much as I get, and I am pleased that budaatum isnt on here to restrain me with a straitjacket through him reading the riot act to me.

Tears may flow in the night, but joy comes in the morning. Tears of joy, ah what a bliss.

budaatum:
I am so sorry that you walk on eggs muttley.

Walking on eggshells is what I obviously meant to type out

budaatum:
I do however find it insulting when people ask me to read slowly or carefully as if I didn't to start with. And I too go back and read stuff over and over and over again.

You're just too sensitive
There is nothing to find abusive in recommending to you, something I regularly do myself and find gainful when I do it

budaatum:
I must confess that I have a lot less patience with you than I have with some others on here, and I do not hide it when communicating with you. With the more simple, I have no choice, but not with you since I know you are far from simple and intelligently minded.

To be really honest with you, when you have those moments, I just put it down to you waking and getting up from the wrong side of the bed, you just be unneccesarily grouchy and/or letting off steam at my expense. Take it out on easy and close target MuttleyLaff I guess.

budaatum:
That's why I get frustrated whenever I think you have not engaged your mind when communicating with me. When you don't engage your mind, I am insulted because I know you have a mind that is engagable, so why the heck would you hide it from me? Do you not find me worthy of your very best maybe? That said, whenever you do engage your mind, I henceforth promise to ensure the eggs you walk on are hard boiled first. As to walking through a minefield, that I cannot help you with since I am that complex, legion and all, but I hereby cover you with the blood of Jesus and promise that none of the mines will blow you up. You, muttley, must fear no evil

Thank you budaatum, but I havent the spirit of fear in me that'll make me fear no evil. So you need not be concerned for me. You see, no weapon fashioned against me prospers budaatum. That's why I can refute everyone (e.g. luvmijeje, jesusjnr etcetera) who tries to falsely accuse me.

budaatum:
Your aesthetic line feeds just make you more difficult to read, do note, since we are very capable of moving our eyes along long lines and expect to. Do you yourself find it difficult reading long lines perhaps? If we have difficulty moving our eyes along long lines we would hardly move our minds now would we! Besides, most probably read on a phone screen with lines that are not long at all. Stop trying to make us too lazy to move our eyes if you would please that is, and divert the effort to moving minds instead. You, sir, are more than capable.

I completely see your point. You're God sent budaatum. You showed me how careless & sloppy I've being with my test scenario. I only tested and viewed the test result outcome using my MacBook only. If I had included the smartphone as another test scenario I would have realised what you actually pointed out to me that it is rendered differently on phone screens browsers
I tested out what you said, looked at the same content on both laptop and phones screens, my line feeds, carriage returns for you, where not rendered the exact way seen on my laptop screen.
I also found out that the only way my tested content is rendered on the phones, exactly the same it is seen on my Mac laptop, is when the phone i sturned from potrait to landscape view. Anyway I've now adapted, to the barest minimum, of living without line feeding.

budaatum:
Now, let's see how far we've gotten, shall we. Yes I have likely taken or made choices that had ugly consequences, and did not delight or look forward to the choices I made that had ugly consequences, but not in relation to my freely chosen demons which exist at my pleasure and go when I tell them to go.

Well, I was talking generally and on a broaden scope anyway. I widened the goal post, so to speak or as it were with the remark

budaatum:
By the way, you never did ask what my demons are, not that I'd tell you if you did, mind.

I dont have to ask you what your demons are budaatum.
Have you forgetten I remarked that demons are complex incorporeal phenonema and so there's more to demons than meets the eye.

Demons, I reiterate, are relative.

budaatum:
There is nothing wrong in doing both if you can separate what you know from what you believe or don't believe.

My sentiment exactly

budaatum:
Things I believe are things I don't quite know either way but chose one.
When I know, I don't tend to believe anymore because I know.
I cannot insist that what I believe is actually so, and when it matters, I try to find out.

The sign of intelligence is that you're constantly questioning to find out

budaatum:
Beliefs are a barrier to actual knowledge.
Once most people have formed a belief on a subject they stop considering alternatives
(can't say that about you though with you recent dabble into Buddhism, though your become Buddha is ill informed).
A bit more effort and you'd know whether your beliefs were true or not.

I met a charming lady on here, a buddhist, just like you, sometime in August this year. The lady remarked that:
"Buddha Sakyamuni said that all humans are equal, and we are future buddha".

At that, I responded by saying:
"#IfYouKnowYouKnow
If you know, you know, then you are already a buddha, a knower

Being and/or becoming a buddha, a knower, can be now and doesnt have to be in the future sense.

By the way, I am a buddha right now, increasingly knowing more by the day and not a future buddha

You too, can be a buddha, can be a buddha now.
You can know things, that Buddha Sakyamuni or Xunfeng, your Spiritual guide, knows nothing about and hasnt written anything about
You can know the truth firsthand, "

Hope with that recapitulation, you now understand and know how I am a Buddha, budaatum.

budaatum:
And there's an example of the detriment of belief.
Your belief in an existence thereafter - and a belief it is - influences your behaviour in the now.
Some are so more concerned with the thereafter that they lose focus of the now.
That's like worshipping the Father in heaven whom you see not while disregarding one's neighbour in the here and now.
Don't you believe you are more important than the birds and the bees and would be taken care of and so should not worry?

When you have regard for your neighbour that's here and now, you are worshipping God already by that

Jesus explained this with the parable of the sheep and the goats.
Check out Matthew 25:31-45 to for full gist
[url]https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+25%3A31-45&version=KJV[/url]

budaatum:
How many faiths biblically exist?

I asked you first, but never mind, I'll answer you anyway. I know of, at least 14 numbers of types of different faith. You do know, I am taking of believe, the verb?

budaatum:
Understanding is a product of knowing.
And accepting things as true without evidence, is cooking things up in the head.
If one cooks up nonsense in one's head, understanding might be elusive because reality would not correspond to their opinion of it.

Is it nonsense cooked up in one's head going to bed each night believing to wake up again in the land of the living?
Is it nonsense, getting out of bed each time, believing it is going to be a good and blessed day?

budaatum:
I've seen a woman battered black and blue by the man she swears loves her.
The wage of her sin of misunderstanding was surely death.

We all have moments when we refuse to face reality and so our priorities aren't quite up to scratch.

budaatum:
Do note that the facts of a piece of work may not be true but the inherent lesson might.

What facts are not true?
What piece of work is this?

budaatum:
Just note how Jesus turned understanding of the word of God on its head.
The Pharisees loved quoting it, and so did Satan.

Yeah, but Jesus is the Word of God, so that is authority who really knows all that needs to be known on what the Pharisees & Satan love quoting, speaking there.

LordReed:
You are a stupid goat. I didn't ask you anything so please focus your attention elsewhere.

You can call me whatever adjective you deem fit as much as you like, even till kingdom come.

It will not change how this forum was set up, that being, it is a public forum open to public expressions which allows posting unsolicited comments anywhere that takes anybody's fancy, without being policed, intimidated, bullied, cast aspersions at, without being belittled, without being called insulting or rude names etcetera.

Lords are well known for being familiar with honour, dignity and decorum

If you dont welcome comments to posts you put on Nairaland, then I recommend you start writing with invisible ink.

LordReed:
I still don't recall asking you anything.

Dont be daft. Who told you that you need to ask for comments to be made on posts on Nairaland?
You've deceived if you were told so.

Michellekabod:
Agnostic atheist then

Not even a convincing concede
No dictionary, nobody's labels, nor someone's confines, can without your consent define who you are.
You tell who you are, you define what you are!

²⁷Jesus and his disciples went on to the villages around Caesarea Philippi. On the way he asked them,
“Who do people say I am?”
²⁸They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, one of the prophets.”
²⁹“But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?”
Peter answered, “You are the Messiah.”
- Mark 8:27-29

Notice Mark 8:29 from above, it boils down to you. No dictionary to go to before articulating who you are.
Not someone corralling another into labels for them to define who they are

It's an inward thing, more of internal personal thoughts without external influencing stimuli.
It's like bam, who are you, bam give your answer, an explicit reply.

I dont find your statetement unreasonable, when agreeing that church folks is not just bad, but is an understatement.
What were you expecting church and church folk to be like?
The word church, to start with, when translated back doesnt even remotely have anything in meaning and concept to the original Greek word ekklesia

You're pissed, I can understand that, I really and truly do. Real human beings will do.
I know you've probabaly thought what kind of God, a supposedly powerful, intelligent and all knowing Being could seemingly let the world be messed up as it looks. Misery, diseases, violence, death, crimes, evil, hatred, famine, poverty, sickness, cruelty etcetera.
Yeah, the bad, uglies and fuglies but then there is more than meet the eyes...

Close to 30 years? Deng, long time man, thats a long time to be tearing hair out over the status quo

LordReed:
Don't let anybody make you feel ashamed of your position.

You're smiling like as if being the Cheshire cat who got the cream.
Satisfied and happy with yourself now that she's settled to being an Agnostic atheist.

EBUKA777:
SHOULD TRUE CHRISTIANS PRAY OR FIGHT AGAINST THEIR ENEMIES?

By C.C Anaedu

For centuries, humans have battled or engaged in a fight against their human enemies. Many have extended this fight to unknown enemies of darkness of this world. We do not need to define who an enemy is, one thing is common among them, they all oppose ,attack, work evil against humans.

WHAT DOES THE BIBLE REALLY SAY ON HOW TO REACT OR RESPOND TO THIS ENEMIES?

From the time of old testament, Jehovah gave Moses the law, He specifically gave Israelites instructions on how to respond to anyone who fights, opposes, persecutes or attack or resist them.

(A) Exo. 20v18-27.
verse 24 says EYE FOR EYE, TOOTH FOR TOOTH, HAND FOR HAND, FOOT FOR FOOT, BURN FOR BURN, WOUND FOR WOUND, BLOW FOR BLOW.

(B) Leviticus 24v17-20
verse 20,
" FRACTURE FOR FRACTURE, EYE FOR EYE, TOOTH FOR TOOTH, THE SAME SORT OF INJURY HE INFLICTED SHOULD BE INFLICTED ON HIM"

(C) Deut.19v21
"YOU SHOULD NOT FEEL SORRY : LIFE WILL BE FOR LIFE, EYE FOR EYE, TOOTH FOR TOOTH, HAND FOR HAND, FOOT FOR FOOT".

(D) Exo. 22v18
" YOU MUST NOT ALLOW A SORCERER (WITCH) TO LIVE.

The above scriptures from the law of Moses have been the basis and foundations where those professing Christians around the world today use to pray, fight back against their enemies. But then, something happened, JESUS CHRIST, came and told us that he has come to fulfill the law of Moses. Matt. 5v17. Thus after fulfilling these laws, the Law of Moses was set aside, ended with the death of Jesus Christ.

Rom. 10v4
"FOR CHRIST IS THE END OF THE LAW, SO THAT EVERYONE EXERCISING FAITH MAY HAVE RIGHTEOUSNESS ".

Heb.7v12
"FOR SINCE THE PRIESTHOOD IS BEING CHANGED, IT BECAME NECESSARY TO CHANGE THE LAW AS WELL ".

The law of Moses that contains law of revenge, and fight against our enemies has been set aside, it has ended. Christians are no longer operating under the law of Moses but UNDER GRACE. Rom. 6v14, The law of Moses is the law of Sin and death. Rom. 8v1-3. The law of Moses has been changed with the law Grace.

WHAT DID JESUS TEACH HIS DISCIPLES ON HOW TO RESPOND TO OUR ENEMIES?

Matt. 5v38-39
"YOU HAVE HEARD THAT IT WAS SAID: "EYE FOR EYE AND TOOTH FOR TOOTH'. HOWEVER, I SAY TO YOU :DO NOT RESIST THE ONE WHO IS WICKED, BUT WHOEVER SLAPS YOU ON YOUR RIGHT CHEEK, TURN THE OTHER ALSO TO HIM".

Matt. 5v43-45
"YOU HEARD THAT IT WAS SAID : 'YOU MUST LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AND HATE YOUR ENEMIES '. HOWEVER, I SAY TO YOU : CONTINUE TO LOVE YOUR ENEMIES AND TO PRAY FOR THOSE WHO PERSECUTE YOU, SO THAT YOU MAY PROVE YOURSELVES SONS OF YOUR FATHER WHO IS IN THE HEAVENS,..."

Luke 6v27-28
"BUT I SAY TO YOU WHO ARE LISTENING: CONTINUE TO LOVE YOUR ENEMIES, TO DO GOOD TO THOSE HATING YOU, TO BLESS THOSE CURSING YOU, TO PRAY FOR THOSE WHO ARE INSULTING YOU".

Jesus' words are very clear. Jesus taught us to love our enemies and persecutors, to pray for them not to pray against them, He taught us not to wish them bad or take revenge against them. Jesus taught us to bless our enemies and those cursing us. Those who pray and curse their enemies to die, those who pray against them, those who fight them or take revenge are simply not following Jesus Christ teachings and ARE NOT TRUE CHRISTIANS. Those who teach contrary to these teachings of Jesus are simply FALSE TEACHERS. See 2John v9-11, Matt. 7v15-23.

WHAT DID APOSTLES OF JESUS TEACH ON THIS?

Rom. 12v17-20
RETURN EVIL FOR EVIL TO NO ONE.... DO NOT AVENGE YOURSELVES, BELOVED, BUT YIELD PLACE FOR WRATH; FOR IT IS WRITTEN :"'VENGEANCE IS MINE; I WILL REPAY,' SAYS JEHOVAH'" BUT IF YOUR ENEMY IS HUNGRY, FEED HIM; IF HE IS THIRSTY, GIVE HIM SOMETHING TO DRINK; FOR BY DOING THIS YOU WILL HEAP FIERY COALS ON HIS HEAD. "

Apostles of Jesus taught exactly what Jesus taught them. We can see it from Paul's letter to Romans. Those who are teaching contrary to this teach today, are they adhering to only on teachings of Christ? are they really true Apostles of Jesus, No, they are false teachers.

We can also observe Stephen, one of the Apostles of Jesus demonstrated this when he was persecuted to the point of death. Did he pray that God will punish his persecutors and kill them? "Then, kneeling down, he cried out with a strong voice : ''Jehovah, do not charge this sin against them." After saying this, he fell asleep in death".
Friends, it is by acquiring the accurate knowledge of the scriptures that we can know God's will, it is only when we know his will and do them that we can please him, and until we please Jehovah God, we cannot inherit his Kingdom.

_IF YOU ARE BLESSED BY THIS ARTICLE AND WISH TO STUDY THE BIBLE TO LEARN MORE ACCURATE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SCRIPTURES , FEEL FREE TO SEND ME A MESSAGE._

You are not to partake in imprecatory prayers on human beings, especially when you know that Jesus said we should love and pray for our enemies

flamingREED:
I wanna' dvice you.
NEVER EVER TAKE YOUR ENEMIES LIGHTLY.

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer

alBHAGDADI:
You mean those unclear comments she made?

She couldn't even state the chapter she got her Bible passage from, yet you want me to argue with her. The passage wasn't even talking about first fruits.

OK ooo but you could have let her know and by virtue of that the readership as well too.

I am waiting to see when and what you are going to write about giving that is about you deciding how much you decide to give and the giving that you aren't told how much to give, in addition of you not being forced, tricked, cajoled, threatened, made to feel inadequate if unable or not in a position to give.
Please mention me when you do

spongeisback:
At least she had more balls than Abraham, the first mad dad.

The times and circumstances were different.
She lost her marbles, that's what it is. She didn't have more balls than Abraham.

Abraham wasn't mad, if he was, then he was just as mad as everyone around him was mad. They all were mad into sacrificing, being heathens that they all were

OkCornel:
alBHAGDADI, why are you dodging this question?

This is the third time I am bringing it to your attention. Where did God precisely ask for salary or wages as first fruit?

He is under pressure.
He is busy checking what to pull out from his haystack of lies to respond with

I couldn't help not noticing the way alBHAGDADI avoided replying to the 2 comments babeosis made.

LordReed:
He gave me a Mouth Action but didn't swallow that's why I am sulking. Are you happy now? LMFAO!

He never!
You're a brave man and must have great massive balls of steel. I'll never let him have a peek, talkless having a golden opportunity of holding mine

LordReed:
Then kindly buzz off as the question wasn't for you.

Touchy. Father Christmas obviously didn't pay someone a visit on boxing day and that person is still sulking and being grouchy

When you get your own platform set and you see me on it, then tell me to kindly buzz of. OK?

LordReed:
He is both a prick and an arsehole, a judgemental one at that.

Fela will just chuckle and say: "Na double wahala for deady bodi be dat"

By now you should realise there is difference between belief and knowledge. I don't believe a god or gods exist but I don't know if they do exist. Many people think agnosticism is a different position from atheism when in actuality they overlap. You can believe in god or gods and not know for certain.

LordReed:
See chart below for more clarity.

You are not proving anything with information like this to me, like as if I didnt know about all those 4 unsolicited & unnecessary information before.

She is smart and clever enough to know what she calls herself or how she defines herself. If she was anything other than plain simple and sweet agnostic, she would have said outrightly so my dear friend.

kkins25:
Here you go sir

Thanks but no thanks. I saw it the first time round.

kkins, anything after Dantedasz's first four lines of that post was what he added to the original.

I am interested in replies coming from Evangkatsoulis only, and honestly speaking, I wasnt pleased seeing that Dantedasz seems to be assisting Evangkatsoulis with possible information, he might take advantage off to present as part of his answers to the 5 questions

It's Evangkatsoulis I am facing. Sorry.

lightblazingnow:
Shut down immediately uncircumcised tongue which is why you should know better
Lesbian

I dont see a lesbian, I see a strong woman.
I see a "woman, where are those thine accusers? Has no one condemned you?" woman

LordReed:
You are a sick judgemental arsehole

You've changed, on page 0 from calling him a judgemental prïck to now, on page 4, saying he is a sick judgemental arsehole. This is confusing, please make up your mind which.

Michellekabod:
How are you doing?
Am an agnostic oh, am not a atheist

LordReed:
Do you believe a god or gods exist?

What part of her "I dont know" dont you understand?
She saying she is agnostic has already answered your question

Sorry o Ranchhoddas, I empathise with you.
I thought it was a one off, so didnt think of needing to warn you that there is something written on that my post that sets off the antispam bot to hide the post and gift, whoever responds, with a posting ban, when trying to post their reply and mentioning the post.

Avoid mentioning that my particular post about the table shake, like a plague. Dont touch it.
Copy out, whatever you need to reply to, afresh from it and just dont touch that post

Ranchhoddas:
He's not on the face of the earth. He doesn't count.

Ah, haba, na you dey talk like this. Jesus counts. Jesus said: "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" and there are you saying: "He doesn't count."

We owe a lot to Jesus so you can't discount Him.
This conversation of doctrinal alignment arose because of Jesus' doctrines, so I am in total doctrinal alignment with all that follow and adhere
to Jesus Christ's teachings

Ranchhoddas:
When will you get there?

I, you, each one of us, we and everybody else are told to be perfect by Jesus Christ. "Teleios" is the Greek word used in the original text for perfect, now that "teleios" greek word, contextually means, developed into a consummating completion by fulfilling the necessary process of going through the mill
Remember, we are work in progress, growing each day towards getting to be mature or come of age

Ranchhoddas:
Tell me one pastor you think is not fraudulent?

For the mere fact, that you call yourself a pastor, for the mere fact you permit others addressing you as pastor without correcting them, then such, already is fraudulent albeit out of ignorance.
Pastor is meant to be a verb anyway, not a noun. Jesus is the only noun Pastor, everyone else are just verb pastors.

Feeding (i.e. verb) the flock isnt a licence to be called a pastor/shepherd. The pastor title is reserved for Jesus, the True, One and Only Shepherd and so it isnt just fradulent calling yourself a pastor and/or permitting others addressing you as pastor without correcting them, it also is an indictment

It's actually similar to a parent administering medicine to an unwell child isnt a licence for the parent to be called a doctor or someone cooking for the family isnt a licence to be called a chef as if like one from any of those Michelin starred restaurants.

Ranchhoddas please I've always advised you not to shake tables, as you know quite well, it only leads to opening the can of worms on the table and letting out its pretty odious stench.

Mikefrik:
Oga de, na you i dey follow talk. Abi na your pikin moniker be that?
Don't worry, continue wanking your destiny and probably your future out, so that your future children will have no future to hold on to.

shebi science says that 95percent of men masturbates? abi no be u talk am? Winks......
Shea u don forget, make I quote am for you.

Mikefrik:
Yes I'm the one who said so, so what's the big deal? hm?.

I feel unhappy and uncomfortable because I have realized that masturbation is evil and leads to hell, and also that people like you who does masturbates but try to hide up will have greater damnation in hell if they don't repent. (so repent before time and grace runs out on you)

And i know you feel comfortable and happy while/after doing it because you have not discovered the truth yet. but I know you will.
Na you go still come nairaland come open thread with the title (MASTURBATION IS EVIL).

Mikefrik:
I'm not roping according to your strange and unusual English.

Actually what I'm doing is trying to make you get sense and not perish in/with your ignorance.
so the earlier you get over your ignorance, false believe, science based fact and try spirituality, the better for you, ur children, parents, and generation.

When is your birthday?
I need to know, so to remember getting you a dictionary as a birthday gift

The less people know of a subject matter, the more stubbornly they think they know it
Take this as an unexpected missed education, learning and understanding opportunity.

I've let go, I've stopped waiting around. I've moved on.
You wont hear fiam again, from me, after this post to any mention of the MuttleyLaff moniker made by you

Evangkatsoulis:
Yes na, why can't He?

I am all ears. You tell me:
1/ Why can God tell you to drown your daughter or son and set fire to the body on a table put somewhere in the garden?
2/ Why will God tell you to drown your daughter or son and set fire to the body on a table put somewhere in the garde?
3/ What would God be calling this action and demand by him telling you to drown your daughter or son and set fire to the body on a table put somewhere in the garden
4/ What will prompt God to want to tell you to drown your daughter or son and set fire to the body on a table put somewhere in the garden?
5/ What is the rationale and/or reason behind God telling you to drown your daughter or son and set fire to the body on a table put somewhere in the garden

Again think the questions through and properly before you give your answers

Evangkatsoulis:
It could be either. I don't know why you think that God can't do it.
God as the ultimate moral arbiter is beyond good and evil. He decides what's good and what's bad. If he says killing your loved one is good, then it is good because he says so. No other reason.
So do you think the command to drown her 4-year-old daughter is good or evil? If evil, by whose standards, God or man? If by God, can't he then will it to be good?

Are you telling that you believe God, in this dispensation we are living in and under, could tell you to drown your daughter or son and set fire to the body on a table put somewhere in the garden?

Think carefully before you give your answer please.

Evangkatsoulis:
You don't have proof that it was demons and not the real God that told her to do so?

Hazard a guess.
Who do you think between demons and the real God told her to drown her four-year-old daughter and set fire to her body on a coffee table in the garden?

Mikefrik:
Mr Man. I joke with people like you who doesn't need the real gist. What is that difficult and embarrassing situation that is more serious than you being brainwashed by science ehn?. even if I'm in any situation, then you are also in with me, "By their fruits you shall know them"
Continue wanking your destiny out.

Look at this man, who are you saying ''Continue wanking your destiny out." to?

Wasnt it you who publicly said you are unhappy or uncomfortable over masturbating?
Why are you now trying to rope me and/or others with you and your pastime?

Are you trying to rope me and/or others with you because you're that desperate for company?
Or is it because you believe in the saying: "there's safety in numbers"?

Mikefrik:
But don't die in the act, as you would need to educate your sons and daughters on how to self-service very very well. u know what I mean now. #LikeFatherLikeSon. winks......... �

Worry about your difficult and embarrassing situation first
At the rate you're going and the path you've taken to, if not careful, you'll be with the difficult and embarrassing situation for a long time.

Are you scared of the truth or just not ready for the truth?
Dont look for things, you are not ready to find or know about.
Maybe you're so hopelessly dependent on it, that you are not ready to have it unplugged