₦airaland Forum

IAmHim1:
lolzzzz. if the term 'feminist' caters to both gender, why is it 'girly-termed'

FEMIN- IST and not MAsCUL- INIST

since both term agrees theres a problem with both genders, why not call yourself a masculinist henceforth

theyre playing you PoliteActivist by distorting the meaning of the word.

sugar is no longer called sugar again but sucrose or 'diet'
people hate sugar but they dont hate sucrose BECAUSE THEY DONT KNOW WHAT SUCROSE IS

THE W.O.R.D IS CHANGING. open your eyesss

*Politeness*
Oh, you are mistaken. There's not a problem with both genders, only the female gender. We are disadvantaged by both nature and our patriarchal society (where men make all the rules). Simply acknowledging that is my definition of feminist

lordnkem000:
Missed you so much sweetie.
U see that palost about many good men and women being dealth with? So so true, you start suspecting each other and being scared. True words.
Those quotes too about successful men is also partially true. Behind every successful man most times there are no women, and you are right when you say women pick successful men, I think it's the reason they don't like identifying with an unsuccessful man. Very few will stick by a man. Your quotes are always top notch and i look forward to it everyday. Happy Sunday and happy new week in advance. Feels so good hearing from you my sweet. Pls be careful and stay outta trouble

*Politeness*
Thank you so much mah dahling. Happy new month. May your month (special month because shortest month) be filled with the best of God's blessings!
Here's more "live a better life" stuff,

LordReed:
Dumdum, there was no time before time started, you tool. That is why we can only count 13.8 billion years which, you absolute tool, is not infinity.

Dumdum focus! We are talking about the universe not outside it, you dimwit.

You are just a stupid regurgitating bot with no comprehension of what you are even spoon fed.

*Politeness*
He finally reveals the source of his confusion!!
"We are talking about the universe not outside it"
Finally he admits he was wrong!
When did we say we were only talking within the universe?? We were talking of time and spatial nothing!! Same way with speed, we were not only talking about the universe otherwise why would I say you can always go faster infinitely when we know there is a speed limit in the uninverse??
Finally!
QED on both Einstein quote and time/space!
Notice how I always defeat you?
QED
Ciao!

LordReed:
No dumdum it's not a well known quote because it is not in any of his works or letters. The fool here is you who keeps saying things he doesn't know. Mr Researcher prove me wrong and say the work or letter he wrote it in. Should be very easy for you with your vaunted research skills.

*Politeness*
You know, I keep trying to prevent you continuing making a fool of yourself. If you had only asked yourself why you are the only one doubting the quote, you would have stopped embarrassing yourself. See below, genius!

LordReed:
Look at this one who has to constantly invoke authority accusing me of being unable to think for himself. What a tool.

Dumdum there was no time! And there was no space! They both began at some point so they are not infinite. Are your brain cells doing social distancing, that's why it's not connecting in that brain of yours?

Dumdum can't even wrap his brain round the fact that we say that time began 13.8 billion years ago already indicates that it is finite. Have you ever seen were infinity is countable? What a knucklehead.

*Politeness*
Genius who can't think for himself, what was the period before your big bang started your time if not time? What would you call it?? Same with spatial nothing ("space*). Before big bang there was spatial nothing. If we assume the universe is finite, beyond the universe there is still nothing which continues infinitely. THINK for once, genius!

LordReed:
And I gave you an assignment to go find who claimed Einstein said it or alternatively point out the letter or work that contains the quote. Oga researcher it shouldn't be too hard for you na.

*Politeness*
Kindly, you kinda making a fool of yourself sir. This is not only a well-known Einstein quote, it is one quote that is actually im his "voice" and not in any doubt at all by any relevant authority. It is like doubting Descartes said "I think therefore I am"! Here's the quote again, go to work and find out if any other person is doubting Einstein said it besides your humble self:

Everything is determined, the beginning as well as the end, by forces over which we have no control. It is determined for the insect, as well as for the star. Human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune, intoned in the distance by an invisible piper. - Albert Einstein

LordReed:
Did time begin? Did space begin? Answer those 2 simple questions to reveal how how shallow you are.

You yourself said that the the speed of light indicates a processor limit so how can a processor with limits simulate Infinity? Use that muscles between your ears at some point instead of regurgitating what you barely understand.

*Politeness*
Kindly, you're talking like someone who can neither visualize nor reason for himself, only what he read somewhere.
THINK! What was the time b4 time started? Same for nothing-space - what was there before nothing-space and what would be there at the end of it?
Guy below also says it well

LordReed:
Time and space started 13.8 billion years ago therefore it is finite. The universe is expanding it means it has a boundary that already delineates a limit.

BTW if you think the universe is infinite then where does your simulation enter in? LoLz.

*Politeness*
I thought you were smarter. In mathematics and physics there is only space-time. In real life common sense ought tell you space and time can't be finite. What do you call the time before time started and what would you call the time after time ends?? Same with nothing ("space". What do you call the nothing after nothing ends and what was there before nothing started??

As to how infinite universe fits into simulation, I thought you were smarter. How hard is it to make space infinite in a matrix?? Also, in a simulation the infinitude of space would be an illusion. We can only see a finite portion of it, which contains evidence that it is actually infinite, but only that finite portion that we can sense need actually be simulated at all, and only much smaller portions need be simulated in any great detail.
Also, remember, we only know it is generated, matrix-wise or otherwise, but we don't know how. And it is highly unlikely it was generated in the same exact way as our computers of today.
All we know is, it is not "real", it is not the "real world". And when something is not real you can have an infinite number of infinite universes!

LordReed:
See person wey talk say e do research. Bwahahahahaha!

*Politeness*
I thought you were better than this. Are you only now finding out there is debate as to Einstein's last words? Why do you think I didn't mention it in my write-up nor did I insist on it nor did I tell you to research it.
You were told specifically what to research.
An Einstein quote was spelled out for you and you were told to research to find out if anyone else is doubting Einstein said it - except your genius self l!

LordReed:
Yes the universe is finite because it has a boundary. Maybe you need to research that too.

LoLz! Keep hiding behind that finger. As if it was not you who said:

*Politeness*
We don't know that the universe is finite and it is impossible for us to know. Most of the universe is unobservable to us. There is a hypothesis that it is finite, just as there is a hypothesis that it is not.

But there are things we KNOW cannot be finite. They are time, space (nothing), and speed. No matter how fast something is going it can always go faster unless there is an external constraint preventing it.

Elemosho478:
So it is no more a god but now forces lol

You are gradually seeing the light lol

*Politeness*
Maybe you're a bit confused by your obsession with the word "god"
The contention has always been: was this our reality set up (which of course implies a force behind it - "God*) or was it all by happenstance?

Indigbo:
Everyone had written Ivory coast off now they could go on to win this tournament. Trust me. Senegal is overhyped, Nigeria can beat Senegal

*Politeness*
Host countries should always win AFCON if burying of juju were as effective as we think in Africa. Because the host country will have all the time in the world to bury juju all over the place before the other countries arrive.

How come we never ask questions like this about juju??😎

LordReed:
LMAO if you did any research you won't have quoted some wonky quote attributed to Einstein that is not really from Einstein. Up your research game bro.

You haven't explained anything. Telling me that something is finite therefore there must be an external influence is bunkum. The entire universe is finite so why pick one aspect of it tell me there is something special about its own "finiteness"?

You can't explain anything because you are simply parroting something you think validates your beliefs. Look at you trying to hide behind your finger claiming you aren't talking about a god. LoLz.

BTW even if the simulation hypothesis was proved conclusively tomorrow it still won't prove that your god exists. Bwahahahahaha!

*Politeness*
Everything is determined, the beginning as well as the end, by forces over which we have no control. It is determined for the insect, as well as for the star. Human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune, intoned in the distance by an invisible piper. - Albert Einstein

Here's what I.mean by research: copy the above and find out if anybody else is doubting Einstein said it besides your genius self!.

You keep saying the universe is finite. How do you know??

My contention has always been that this our reality was set up by forces outside it. You are the one obsessed with the word "god"!

*Politeness*
Host countries should always win AFCON if burying of juju were as effective as we think in Africa. Because the host country will have all the time in the world to bury juju all over the place before the other countries arrive.

How come we never ask questions like this about juju??😎

KnownUnknown:
Don’t care what they say. If the topic is their expertise then I’ll give them an ear but their delusions do not become valid just because they are an authority in a particular field. They are not the “vanguard” of anything.

*Politeness*
It is their expertise! Elon Musk is at the vanguard of all these. He owns xAI and designed computer games all his youth, plus he is a confirmed genius. You can't get more expert than that!

KnownUnknown:
@PoliteActivist

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority

Doesn’t matter what the apartheid swine thinks or what Einstein allegedly said.

*Politeness*
Your quarrel is not just with Einstein, it is also with Elon Musk, Tyson Degress, and just about every person at the vanguard of thought, AI, simulation, and computing. They are all wrong and you and Nairaland atheists who say nothing organized our reality are right!

LordReed:
You keep teaching me anything but the exact thing I asked you about. LoLz. BTW the reason the quote doesn't appear in any of Einstein's works is because he didn't say it, someone else claims he said it. Funny isn't it LMAO!

Dude show me how you know it is therefore because of a god. You cannot jump from a computer processor has finite speed to therefore a god exists. Everything in the universe is finite so how is that evidence of a god?

*Politeness*
I taught you and u want me to do the research for you too Do a little research like me.
You are obsessed with the word "god", aren't you? My only assertion is that this our world was organized. All evidence points to that.
About speed of light, I can't keep explaining g the same thing. This person below says it well also

LordReed:
No it does not, that's your conjecture and you need to demonstrate that is more than just your conjecture. I am pretty sure if the limit didn't exist you'd say it was proof of your god.

Funny how this quote does not pop up in any of his works, hmmmm.

*Politeness*
About Einstein quote, another thing you're learning from me. I keep teaching you!

About speed limit in the universe, in this our reality things don't suddenly stop adding speed. The fact you can't exceed a certain speed no matter what is sign there is external influence Like I told you that is what happens in computer programming- nothing can exceed the speed of the processor

LordReed:
It doesn't matter what light is doing or how it defeats your incredulity, you need to demonstrate that a god is responsible for the phenomenon. Yes I read your post and it still doesn't add up at all. Light has a characteristic therefore god, huh??!!

Stop misquoting people to prove a point, that is not what Einstein said. The quote is:

“I cannot seriously believe [in quantum mechanics] because the theory is incompatible with the requirement that physics should represent reality in space and time without spooky action at a distance...”

Where in that quote does someone or control occur?

*Politeness*
See the Einstein quote below, Mr. Know-it-all.
I don't have to demonstrate anything. Speed limit in the universe is one of many things that point to an underlying controling influence external to this our exitence. In our reality there are no speed limits unless they are imposed by something external

Elemosho478:
So you don't see the "Likely" in those video? which mean it is just his belief without any evidence to back it up but you were saying the world is like a computer program as if you have tangible evidence.

You are the kid here, can't put up a decent argument so you started throwing tantrums.

So how are your wrong analogies that doesn't fit suppose to proof the evidence of God existence ?

You keep saying it is just an analogy, if you want to use an analogy you must use the right analogy and the logic and rules must match to really make a convincing argument.

You really expect people to take your illogical and fallacious analogy as proof of God existence? you are all empty lol

*Politeness*
Kindly, this is what I mean by childish. How can you expect anyone to say definitely we're in a simulation?!
I've already told you that everything we know
(including scientists) is on a "likely" basis. We don’t know anything definitively, including the true nature of our very existence!

LordReed:
You didn't answer my question. Let me rephrase: Why do you think it there needs to be a god for this limit to exit? Can you show that without a god the limit would not exist?

*Politeness*
To save time please read my post above. It is unnatural and illogical that light maintains same speed regardless of how fast the source is traveling.
That and many others point to a system that was set up, and not spontaneous. See my videos above.
Even Einstein came to the conclusion that "there is someone or something in the distance controlling everything"

Elemosho478:
The irony is you are the one that the discussion is above his head, all your analogies is fallacious without any logic and you are just forcing it.

You know a thing or two about science and you think you are a science professor or something that know it all.

It is currently impossible to achieve the speed of light because it will require a lot of energy that we currently can't provide and even if we can provide the energy, we currently don't have anything that can withstand the energy without crumbling and vanishing out of existence.

Your baby in the womb analogy is also fallacious because a baby in the womb have no conscious or know what is going on in the womb to the extent of thinking and asking questions, if the world is like a womb then we shouldn't be conscious, thinking or asking questions just like a baby until we get outside, you can't just pick part of the process that suit you and expect people to agree with your bullshits without any logic. The mother is not the creator or God of the baby, how the baby develops till birth is outside the mother's control, the mother just triggered some process that created the baby and have no control or power over the process, the mother is totally different from the description of your God that is all powerful and supreme that have control over everything. Your analogy is fallacious, the logic doesn't fit and you are just forcing it.

Your second analogy of computer program is also another bollock, no computer program is capable of awareness or self consciousness, computer program only follow what the programmer programmed it to do and so using that analogy means humans and the world are like computer programs and all our thoughts and actions is not in our control and everything that happen on earth is exactly how God the Programmer programmed it to happen, all the sufferings on earth is because God programmed it that way and there shouldn't be something like sin against or even offending God because we are not in control of our thoughts and actions and everything is exactly how God Programmed us to be.

Your analogy of computer program also mean humans are also not self conscious or capable of really thinking on our own all our thoughts and actions is exactly what the God the programmer programmed even our argument on Nairaland is also part of the program, you can't just pick a part that suit you, you must apply the logic to everything.

We can't see Oxygen or air but there is so many evidence Oxygen exist because we can't breathe or even survive without oxygen, we can't see it but we can feel it and even use it and control it. Can we feel your God? breathe your God? or where is the evidence that your God exist just like air or Oxygen ?

As to my meme there was nothing insulting in the meme, you are the kid here for having problems with an harmless meme if you think what the meme says is not sensible then counter it with your own fact and argument whining about it make you the kid here.

*Politeness*
Kindly, I honestly don't have time for childish discussion. Once again, the twin is just an ANOLOGY! We all know babies in the womb can't talk. Geez! It is like someone says a fish saying he doesn't believe water exists. And your response is "fish can't talk". So childish!
Those and the computer anology simply demonstrate why it would be impossible for God to appear as you requested - his nature could be any of those or many others - simply beyond our purview.
About the speed of light thing, you don’t understand: light on a speeding train has exactly same speed as light on the ground, when logically light on a train should have speed of light plus speed of the train!
Just as oxygen, there is so much evidence that this our reality was set up.
Like I said I don't have time, watch some of these videos below. These people are far beyond the rest of humanity in AI and quantum computing. Elon Musk, a genius who owns xAI and is the richest in the world, is in the vanguard of this topic. Learn from their insights

LordReed:
Can you explain how if there were no god there'd be no speed limit in the universe.

*Politeness*
Well, according to logic of our universe, as long as you keep applying force/energy something will keep speeding up indefinitely - it should not be impossible to exceed any speed - that only happens in constructs like computer programs and such, because the processor has a speed limit and nothing in the program can exceed that speed. It is a sign that something was made, that there is something going on, that there is a controlling existence outside the construct!

Elemosho478:
What a load of bollock lol

no baby can talk or think in the womb, babies are not conscious if you really think otherwise then i doubt if you are even intelligent or can think critically.

Who told you there's a speed limit in the universe ? Just because we haven't discover a way to be faster than light yet doesn't mean there's a speed limit in the universe and have you been to other places in the universe to be so sure and that we are the only one in the universe ? there was a time when human couldn't move faster than a horse now we have aircrafts, super cars and can even exceed the speed of sound and so many technologies.

Look at you speaking so enthusiastically about the universe, there was a time we thought there wasn't a thing like that. There was a time when we thought there was nothing beyond the sky and the sky was the limit until we discovered space and the solar system and then the universe.

If you can't comprehend it then it must be because a supreme existence make it that away jumping to conclusion typically like someone that can't think critically, if everyone in the world think like you we would still be living in caves and shits without any advancement in all aspects of life.

There's nothing logical in your write up, all hogwash, make up beliefs and self masturbation.

Science requires proof, religious belief requires faith. Scientists don't try to prove or disprove God's existence because they know there isn't an experiment that can ever detect God.

*Politeness*
Kindly, I think this type of discussion is a bit above you. If you don't even know what an anology is how can we have a discussion? Twins inside a womb is an analogy. God's nature is outside our compression! Another anology - someone inside a a computer game saying "if there really is a programmer why can't he show himself?"
About speed of light, according to logic of our universe, as long as you keep applying force/energy something will keep speeding up indefinitely - it should not be impossible to exceed any speed - that only happens in things like computer programs because the processor has a speed limit and nothing in the program can exceed that speed. It is sign of a controlling existence outside the construct!
But really, how can you look around you and think all this is by happenstance??!!
As to proof, there is no final proof of anything in our existence including if we exist at all as we perceive! Besides, I'm the one who said you can only say you don't know, not that God definitely does not exist!
As to your meme, as I said this discussion is probably a bit above your head - maybe you are very young or something. So you can't see air. Does it mean air does not exist??!

Elemosho478:
Where is the evidence that the universe was created by someone ?

If you say it can not just exist because of a process that was triggered then you must provide sufficient evidence to back up your claim that someone created it.

It is just like a human, we know a human can't exist without certain processes like a woman getting pregnant, giving birth after 9 months etc that's the best evidence and processes we have of a human creation but it is like some people ignoring all those processes and saying the human was created from scratch by a supreme being somewhere without any evidence but just some books written by some delusional people and concocted somewhere.

We can't take your delusions and hallucinations over what we witnessed, observed and experienced you must provide logical evidence of that supreme existence creating human from nothing,
why is he so afraid of showing himself if he really is so powerful ?

The evidence is everywhere. Do you know there is a speed limit in the uninverse? Nothing can go faster than the speed of light no matter how much force you apply - exactly what you'd expect in a computer simulation - nothing can go faster than the speed of the processor. Do you also know that mathematics mirrors the laws of the universe? That mathematical equations have been used to predict what's going on in the universe, and it was later observed to be exactly so in real-life. Then look around you - can't you see that all this couldn't have been happenstance, that it was deliberately set up this way. Cut out fat, sugar, salt, and you’ll have a long, healthy life. Yet those are the things that make things taste good. Anything that really tastes good or enjoyable is either bad for you or it is addictive! There is punishment for every enjoyment, and reward for every suffering. Then fractals. Google it. Even the atom is a replica of the universe. And so forth.
As for showing "himself", it's like twins in the womb, one asking the other "if mother exists why can't she show herself?". Something beyond your comprehension!

Elemosho478:
The same bullshits argument as usual.

*Politeness*
Pertaining your quote, the universe is within creation, wuthin our limited knowledge (within what we can comprehend). And we know it can't exist without a creator. God on the other hand, is outside creation, outside what we can comprehend.

LordReed:
Why would that be the case? Why can't living people have the same certainty?

*Politeness*
Because what you think is death could be hallucination induced by extreme trauma. Scientists have been able to replicate some of these conditions by tampering with the brain. People also do have out-of-body experiences while no where near death. Bottom line: the ONLY proof that someone was really dead is that they never came back!

*Politeness*
What I'll NEVER understand is how anyone can say he is an atheist, that there is no God. The most you can say is that YOU DON'T KNOW!!!

** By the way, nobody has ever died and come back. Because, by definition, if you truly died you can't come back. So only way we can know is to have someone on the other side tell us!

lordnkem000:
This is unbelievable. U mean somebody had the

*Politeness*
These are good

lordnkem000:
I appreciate you too sweetie, you know that. Those quotes are all correct. Very true words and shouldn't be overlooked

*Politeness*
Thank you so much my sweerie pie. Happy Sunday. Those quotes make lots of sense. Here are some for you (Nairaland men will love them! )

FreeIgboho:
Quite good. Here’s one for you

*Politeness*
Quite good too yours. Never knew cancer is so easy to avoid. Here's one 4 you

Mrvictorwrite:
In this like keep a small circle and not a large circle your life will be more easier and simple

bring your assignments

*Politeness*
Makes a lot of sense. Post more. Here's one 4 ya