₦airaland Forum

Slurity:
Your are an educated illetrate to what we are talking about. May you not get sense by force when coronavirus knock you down.

Niyeal:
The company is cool. Though I doesn't like their products

MyVILLAGEpeople:
Where is Abba Kyari

Pls let's pray for his quick recovery.

nextstep:
The Big Bang Theory is a model used to explain a broad range of observed phenomena, and currently offers the most reasonable explanation of how things came to be. In short, the universe is expanding (this is observable), and thus was likely smaller in the past. Follow this thinking to its logical conclusion and you'll get an infinitely dense pin point - a singularity which combined all matter and energy, when all the fundamental forces (gravity, electromagnetism, weak and strong nuclear forces) were all combined into one.

Many of the phenomena we can observe corroborate this story, so yes, I would accept - given our current understanding about the world - that the Big Bang is real.

We don't fully understand it, and there is a paradox that if all mass is energy (E=MC^2), was there 100% energy and 0% mass right before the Big Bang? Take an atom, it's 99.999% empty space, save for nucleus and electrons. Take a quark that makes up the protons, etc... 99.999% empty. We don't yet know what makes a quark and right now they understood to be the fundamental particles. It wouldn't surprise me that we discover that the next thing down is 99.999% empty. Keep going, and it starts to dawn on you that all the things we call "mass" and "objects" are actually forms of energy interacting with the fundamental forces. In other words, it's all energy.

As an aside, squeeze enough molecules into a space, the molecules start to attract themselves, then under immense pressure, nuclear fusion occurs, and bang! "mass" is annihilated and energy is released. There are billions of such bangs in our galaxy... one of them is our Sun. And there are billions of galaxies, all stretching away from each other.

My position is: if theists can accept the idea of a sentient entity always existing - the source of all creation, they should not have any trouble accepting the idea of a singularity event... the source of all creation. The former was the explanation before physics, and the latter is the explanation after physics.

nextstep:
The Big Bang Theory is a model used to explain a broad range of observed phenomena, and currently offers the most reasonable explanation of how things came to be. In short, the universe is expanding (this is observable), and thus was likely smaller in the past. Follow this thinking to its logical conclusion and you'll get an infinitely dense pin point - a singularity which combined all matter and energy, when all the fundamental forces (gravity, electromagnetism, weak and strong nuclear forces) were all combined into one.

Many of the phenomena we can observe corroborate this story, so yes, I would accept - given our current understanding about the world - that the Big Bang is real.

We don't fully understand it, and there is a paradox that if all mass is energy (E=MC^2), was there 100% energy and 0% mass right before the Big Bang? Take an atom, it's 99.999% empty space, save for nucleus and electrons. Take a quark that makes up the protons, etc... 99.999% empty. We don't yet know what makes a quark and right now they understood to be the fundamental particles. It wouldn't surprise me that we discover that the next thing down is 99.999% empty. Keep going, and it starts to dawn on you that all the things we call "mass" and "objects" are actually forms of energy interacting with the fundamental forces. In other words, it's all energy.

As an aside, squeeze enough molecules into a space, the molecules start to attract themselves, then under immense pressure, nuclear fusion occurs, and bang! "mass" is annihilated and energy is released. There are billions of such bangs in our galaxy... one of them is our Sun. And there are billions of galaxies, all stretching away from each other.

My position is: if theists can accept the idea of a sentient entity always existing - the source of all creation, they should not have any trouble accepting the idea of a singularity event... the source of all creation. The former was the explanation before physics, and the latter is the explanation after physics.

9jatriot:
This is better thinking than that other presidential aspirant who plays politics at every given opportunity even though he cannot enter the US accept carried around as a diplomatic aide asking government to start sharing 10k to individuals after condemning tradermoni just a few months ago

senatordave1:
Rubbish

senatordave1:
You will keep going down

holytribe:
Unfortunately, travelling abroad for treatment by this politicians can't make the difference because even people in the abroad are dying.

IfeMiLove:
What a sad day for the bride. May God grant her and his family the strength to bear their loss.

Acidosis:
And people like you wouldn't want to close your 5 naira shop for 5 hours because of greed and love of money.

Before you criticize people, what measures have you taken personally? Would you shut the door of your shop or would you agree to a "no work no pay" rule for the next 3 or 4 weeks?

Pastorpreneur bla bla has done his bit, what have you, Alphapreneur, done?

OlawaleBammie:
I dont bliv this statement, menstrual irregularities at 20s??
and one quack doctor said its cus u re in ur late twenties!!


guy go better hospital for a reliable diagnosis jare, millions of girls are outside there even at the wrong side of thirties and their red visitors are stil regular on monthly basis.

aylive02:
I tap into the blessings.....

PropertyBuying:
But this isn't a Sanusi story!