ShangoThor's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ShangoThor's Profile › ShangoThor's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 24 pages)
Kalu Akanu:@ Kalu Akanu So your position is that because Southern people had a chance to join the East and your conflict with the North, but chose otherwise, we should let the Christian peoples residing in Jos get slaughtered. You are so narcissistic it defies logic and belief, and by the way, how is declaring the Republic of Biafra for peoples of the east including minorities an invitation for all people in Southern Nigeria to join you? |
[size=18pt]Tribalism is for 'Primitive' minds! OMG - Southern Nigeria is the original 'Tower of Babel'![/size] My position : I don't give a flying fu@**ck whether you are from Jupiter, Mars or anywhere else in the cosmos and I refuse to be held accountable for the deeds of my Father's generation, afterall, I was not born when all of this unfolded. I'm only concerned with the present, and like a good parent, I aim to shape the environment and country my kids will eventually inherit. I am aware of certain challenges in the country like whats going on in SS (especially the subjugation and pollution); most importantly, the Jos crises' and the killings of minors, children, women etc. I read somewhere on NL that the majority of victims of the conflict are Igbo's. I have also seen pictures of minors (under 10 yrs old) with the top of their heads chopped open exposing their 'brain matter'. The child was chopped by a machette and after viewing this ghastly disturbing picture, my blood boiled and I could not sleep for days. My 12 year old daughter actually found the pic on the net in the UK, and she started asking me questions. All we could see was a butchered pic of a child with a black face, I did not start thinking or wondering if the child was of Igbo or middle belt descent, because once again, I don't give a flying fu@**ck , apart from the obvious of how I explain this away to my dauughter, , [size=18pt]my quetion is : What do we do about it?[/size] If you're only answer is based on events that occurred in the 50/60's, then you seriouly need to jump into the River Niger and drown yourself.
|
LRNZH:Nope, the people will have to force the issue. But there is no unity amongst the peoples of Nigeria to make the 'Structural changes'. We the people have to partly accept some responsibility for irresponsible government and decadence. I tell my father frequently also that I blame his 'independence generation' for what we are about to inherit. |
[size=18pt]Fix the State and you will fix the problem![/size] This is exactly what happens in a system that has its focus on 'distribution' as opposed 'production', which is how wealth and surplus' are generated. Structural adjustment is required within the sphere of the State. Fix the State and you will fix the problem! It's simple! |
quest003:@ quest003 , Isn't it true that the main obstacle to Gbemi's ambitions is the male chauvanistic Islamic Northern attitude and view about the roles women are meant to play. I have seen articles published about this |
SapeleGuy:[size=18pt]@ Sapele Guy, you're also right on the money here![/size] How do you modernize a country, when leaders in a region within the country have not challenged prevailing attitutes and trends. Where education in a pro-modernity context is seen as western and corruptible, where the foundations of their comfort zone is based on an 'agrarian society'; where more zeal and passion is displayed for implementing Sharia law as opposed to educating their masses; or alleviating/eradicating poverty from their midst; Then the political discourse contribution they are willing to make is to converse about 'zoning' (because they believe they've got a God given right to rule the country, when in fact the privilege was setup and granted by the British colonialists) or 'sharing' the proceeds of 'oil sale receipts',in other words a system that has its focus on 'distribution' as opposed 'production', which is how wealth and surplus' are generated. Enough is enough, what you get in this country should depend on what you are willing to contribute , stop expecting freebies. If the FG agrees that part of its remit should be to act as a massive Welfare State, the recipients should directly be the citizens of the country and not fat pot bellied politicians controlling individual states, a factor greatly influenced by the Northern Caucas. Nobody is entitled to anything free of charge. You get out of it what you contribute. Say no to freebies. So when Onno Ruhl claimed that some States in the FR are displaying signs of being able to grow and fend for themselves, ask yourselves where are those states, is it a coincidence that those states are in the Southern Nigeria? Is there any oil in Lagos? Let true Federalism prevail, let SS keep their oil, and develop their lands, all peoples of Southern Nigeria are capable to producing something, capable of contributing towards a surplus, generating wealth , tribalism is for primitive minds , lets create our Utopia Do you know how efficient the economy of Southern Nigeria was prior to amalgamation? Check the archives , Fix the State, and you will fix the problem. |
[size=18pt]Legalize it all the way - the worlds oldest profession![/size] I commend the starter of this thread for your honesty? Thank you Reality is truly a bit@*ch - |
[size=18pt]@ cashful, I believe tribalism is for primitive minds[/size] I never talk about ethic minorities in a derogatory manner. I wish you luck with your pursuit for a 'Sovereign National Conference', but can we agree on a cut off date, i.e. if you can't achieve this in the next five years we can start to pursue 'option b', Southern region seccession like the Southern Sudanese have done? Shouldn't we let the people ultimately decide? Does this make me a bigot, because I believe in the 'sovereignty of the people' or 'formulating and implementing a workable solution to our problem? Talk is cheap, some people talk, and other peole 'act'. [size=18pt]Fix the State, and you will fix the problem.[/size] |
Beaf:[size=18pt]Beaf is actually bang on the money here, he mentions 'Structure' of the State , [/size] However, according to my logical trail of thought, the opposition to true Federalism in Nigeria stems from the Northern element due to receipts of Oil sales. I do not believe there is huge opposition to true Federalism amongst the various polities of Southern Nigeria, hence in order to realise true Federalism Southern Nigeria might have to pursue the option to secede, or accept that our children will be having this same conversation in 50 years time Fix the State and you will fix the problem, |
Katsumoto:[size=18pt]Same point I reiterate , even though its a hot potato that Nigerians hate addressing it.[/size] IBB, a known looter and poised for running for the office of president, An OBJ govt wouldn't dare arrest him because that move would upset the North/South Schism, this is a fact And people are talking about seizeing assets of perpetrators, understand the nature of the problem Basically, fix the State and you will fix the problem, |
Katsumoto: ndu_chucks:ndu Chuks, you miss my point. Read my thread again, I did not say that only Northerners loot funds from the coffers of the State. I said that we have an 'ineffectual state', and yes I do blame this on the fact that there is a schism between North and South. The only reason why there is no political will to tackle corruption is because there is no unity. In addition, it is not me that fought for the implentation of Sharia law which has an implication of distinguishing states. You will never be able to get any of my posts where I state that I hate Northerners and that is because they are fellow Africans, however, I am realistic enough to recognize that a part of the country sees themselves as different to the rest of the polity. Did I invent zoning? Fix the State, you fix the problem! |
[size=18pt]Too much talking, and very little action , the situation is simple , think of it this way.[/size] Is corruption a bigger problem than our inability as a nation to stem or curb it? or How is it in 50 years of independence that Nigeria has not been able to devise systems that prevent corruption and capital flight? or Nigeria's inability to find solutions to problems and challenges such as 'corruption' is a much bigger problem than the highlighted problems. Hence, yes Nigeria has a myriad of problems, and at the top of that apex of problems is corruption, but you cannot curb it because you have an 'ineffectual State'. Nigeria was formed as an asset of a commercial company. Unfortunately, traits of this still exists. The FG (as a vessel) is more interested in enforcing the rights of Multinationals and their ability to violate the country (and of course they get paid handsomely for doing so) than it is in enforcing the rights of Nigerian citizens. If we rectify the 'State', we solve the problem. But we cannot rectify the 'State' because our Northern country men have a vested interest in the setup of the status quo, where the post independence policy (via Lugard) was to 'extract the funds for developing the Northern region from funds and capital raised in the South. Basically, fix the State and you will fix the problem, |
answer: the signing of the "Bi-National Commission" by the Obama Administration and Nigeria during the interim period between GEJ taking over from the incapacitated Yar'adua propping cabal. |
[size=18pt]Human Rights in Africa is a farce![/size] |
[size=18pt]Mr Onno Ruhl of the world bank was absolutely spot on.[/size] Our ability and confidence as a Nation to formulate and implement solutions has been sapped, Jos crisis = north/south issue = no resolution = no moving forward Ailing & incapacitated president Yar'adua, Goodluck couldn't assume powers = north/south issue Poor infrastructure = north/south issue = unresolved Corruption = north/south issue = unresolved (OBJ could not in a million years have arrested IBB) Armed Forces problem = north/south issue = imbalance in composition = unresolved Federation Formulation problem = north/south issue = forcefully resolved = citizen resentment Oil revenue problem = north/south issue = unresolved and the list goes on and on, |
Dede1: Nigeria number one problem is tribalism and sectional differences both mentally and spiritually. Disintegration of Nigeria will usher new approach to politics and create healthy competition as well as mutual respect among new countries.[size=18pt]The problem with Nigeria is mostly to do with regions. [/size] Tribalism is a colonial construct. The Igbos were never one people and neither were the Yorubas. What hitherto existed were loosely affiliated Polities through language. The rivalry and competing element between the regions stems from our colonial setup (please do your historical research). There is north and south period. What we call tribalism and religion just compounds the issue. For instance, thats why the more progressive southern muslims are not clamouring for the implentation of Sharia law in the south. Nigeria is already logically split. There is a massive difference between that which exists (reality); and the way things ought to be. |
^^^^ that isn't my map, it's a graphical illustration of the States in the North that have implemented Sharia Law. It supports my argument that Nigeria is already logically split. |
[size=18pt]Southern Nigeria referendum [/size]Is this the begining of the end of the dyfunctional colonial constructed State in Africa ![]() Southern Nigerians should also be given a choice to vote on separation because Nigeria is already logically split. Moreover, it should not be the preserve of the relatively few bourgeois within the country to deprive the masses from voting on the issue. LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE !!!
|
[size=18pt]Nothing to do with sentiments or rhetoric, just results: Fashola . . . . all the way![/size] |
[size=18pt]The problem with Nigeria is mostly to do with regions. [/size] Tribalism is a colonial construct. The Igbos were never one people and neither were the Yorubas. What hitherto existed were loosely affiliated Polities through language. The rivalry and competing element between the regions stems from our colonial setup (please do your historical research). There is north and south period. What we call tribalism and religion just compounds the issue. For instance, thats why the more progressive southern muslims are not clamouring for the implentation of Sharia law in the south. Nigeria is already logically split. There is a massive difference between that which exists (reality); and the way things ought to be.
|
[size=18pt]Constantly Updated results of Southern Sudan referendum! [/size] Source link below. http://southernsudan2011.com/ It is also worth noting that all citizens in the diaspora could participate in the democratic process. Wow - we are talking about Southern Sudan Check out the out of the country voting registration page below, it looks sooooooo complex ![]() http://www.goss-online.org/
|
asha 80:@ asha 80, my big fear apart from the obvious of delaying the inevitable is that if we do not make an attempt to determine our destinies, external forces such as the Yanks, Iranians or al qaeda will. I've been monitoring the results of the vote in Sudan and all indications are that the South have voted to secede. It will be so demoralizing if whilst we are still pondering about our situation, the Southern Sudanese form their new country, and start developing a credible Utopia , ![]() |
asha 80:@ asha 80, I agree with you actually, however I am not trying to come across as a revolutionary, but merely trying to appeal to the 'reasonable citizen'. There are tensions and paradoxes in the Nigerian 'arrangement' that have to be resolved before we can move forward. Irrespective of what happens with regards to fragmentation, I will never hate those that choose to secede because the bottom line is that we are all Africans; will always be neighbours; and will have to devise mechanisms to promote co-existence. 1. The North/South divide schism exists whether we like it or not. Sharia law (adopted by the Northern states) contradicts, contravenes and challenges the Constitution. This is simply a matter of core values. The North have every right to implement Sharia, but they have to accept that they have to form a separate country in the interest of all. Hopefully, we will be able to do this amicably. Moreover, there is no other country in the world where Sharia is adopted by virtually half of the country, it is unworkable and why experiment with a scenario that is already fragile. 2. More Independent and stronger Judiciary - there is no point in discussing this without firstly dicussing a complete overhaul, a structural adjustment of the State, the apparatus of the State and the concept of 'the Separation of Powers'. Until the above issues are addressed, we are just delaying the inevitable. |
[size=18pt]What makes a king out of a slave? Courage![/size] I really admire 'courage', I think it is the most pivotal virtue that a lot of Nigerians lack, If we think about the act of setting one's self on fire, it is perhaps the ultimate act of 'self sacrifice' and cannot be compared to a suicide bombing, because there is no desire to injure or kill other individuals. It is also a very deep psychological statement, one that displays complete contempt for the authorities. @ Rossicke, I really respect and share a lot of your views on history and the current state of affairs, however, as weak as you perceive the act to be, it has provoked a nation wide reaction that is forcing change, at least in Tunisia. I have toured Tunisia and it is a relatively modern country with a strong economy and the standard of living was very cheap, that is perhaps why Tunisians endured 2 decades of mis-party rule. Nevertheless, history will read , eventually the people rebelled and the catalyst was a 17 year old boy that defiantly set himself ablaze. At what point do we draw a line in the sand as citizens when certain universal standards of decency are encroached upon; what do we say to our children when they ask us in the future what we did when we were confronted by these challenges; what if we do not have anything worthwhile regarding heritage to pass down to our children. It is never always feasible to 'live in hope' or 'wait and see'. I asked the question of the post thread title because I was playing devil's advocate. My take on Nigeria, the erosion of civil liberties, under-development and developmental regression since the early 80's is that 'we' as Nigerian citizens are complicit in holding her back if not in her demise. There are no unifying threads of common decency that have trancended all geo-polities in Nigeria, hence we are all culpable regarding how we arrived at the status quo. The right of a Yoruba, Igbo, Hausa, Edo, Ijaw citizen to freedom of movement with guaranteed security (not being robbed); to state protection from extortion (especially not by the Police at check points); to protection of pollution of ones community; to protection from exploitation of MultiNational companies is all about common decency which should apply to all. These are natural inalienable rights that should not be compromised irrespective of having had Military Dictatorships in the past. I have never known Nigerians to draw a line in the sand and take a stand, those that do are earmarked as being fringe or radical movements. Fela tried and sacrificed so much for the cause, and when he was being battered and bruised despite losing millions of $$$ in the process of trying to awaken our consciousness to the fact that the 'State' belongs to, or represents an embodiment of the spirit of the people. All I'm saying is that in my humble opinion, we as citizens have to take some responsibility for the scenario that we have today. If all citizens in every state of all ages peacefully engaged in civil disobedience measures aimed at the government to stop the killings in Jos, or Police bribery at check points, or the pollution in the Niger Delta, amongst other causes, the State would find the political will to act. |
^^^^^^ Touche , Rossike, but very true |
[/size]
