Syncan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Syncan's Profile › Syncan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 (of 129 pages)
superior1: I said i understood the direction of your question (I knew you were trying to pin Jude 1:14 to the so called book of Enoch) but have you wondered why the book of Enoch was not canonized?? because the authorship wasn't confirmed (there was many attempt to smuggle many books into the Bible), it was even said that the book of Enoch (which no jewish record show to be from Enoch) actually quoted Jude 1:14 so as to gain acceptance by her author and not Jude quoting it. If i write a book and copied from another book which has been in existence before mine and gave it a name traced to century before the book i copied, it doesn't make the book i copied from the copier.So you believed that the bible is God's word because the early church fathers said so? |
superior1: I believe in the epistles of Paul and I believe his teachings are fully revealed in the totality of his epistles. I also believe what ever he has written are to be adopted by Christians (He commanded it read to the assembly and in a case to be given to another church). If we deviate to Luther, then we will have to address all the heresy he pointed out in the Roman Catholic Church.If you believe in his epistle, then you'll believe in 2Thess2:15. There are Oral and written traditions handed down by Paul and the apostles to their own disciples and they were expected to hold on to that as well. The question I ask you should really make you think, tell me why you think it is the sole authority. |
superior1: Galatians 1:8These are bible passages, what are they meant to show me? I do not dispute them like you do 2Thess2:15. |
superior1: Switched opinions already?You understood the direction of my question and you still claim I've switched opinion. Na wa for you o. Dear brother, in case you do not know, Jude1:14 is a direct quote from 1Enoch1:9 . (but i cant find it in the bible o...yet jude used it to preach). |
superior1: This is the truth, ok?.Do you agree with Paul or not in 2Thess2:15, or are you going to behave like martin Luther that called the epistle of James "the epistle of straw" just because it contains what contradicts his position? Remember you still owe me "why do you believe in the bible and not other books as the inspired word of God". |
superior1: Where?You said: superior1: The Bible is the inspired word of God and basis of doctrine of Christian faith, any teaching outside of it and not found in the bible should be discardedbut the bible said: 2Thess2:15:You can spot the contradiction yourself. |
superior1: non-biblical books are not recognized as scripturesRead Jude1:14 bro and tell me if the apostle was quoting, scripture or not. |
superior1: The Bible is the inspired word of God and basis of doctrine of Christian faith, any teaching outside of it and not found in the bible should be discardedThis is not only absent from the bible but a direct contradiction to what it says. |
superior1: Syncan, we will start repeating our talk all over again. If he said things by word of mouth relevant to doctrine, what are they?, who documented it, at which of the churches?, when was it scriptured? and when was it adopted, was it accepted by the Churches at the east, asia manor, syria, rome like the new testament?You see my friend, let's not be jittery here. Why use "If he said" when you can read very well that he said. The moment we start being economical with truth, the moment we cannot comprehend freely. So do you believe paul or not? then I can take on the rest issues you raised. Note that you still have not told me Why the bible and not other books as mentioned. |
superior1: True, Christ wrote down nothing and what we have as scriptures today are what the Apostles are inspired to write (plus the old testament). The ministry of Holy Spirit is to direct us in these truths.You keep avoiding the truth, Paul placed a curse on any gospel contrary to what he and the rest disciples were teaching, both in words and epistles. Never only what he wrote! |
DrummaBoy: Ok bross. I think I get your drift. With FluorishG and others taking the apology maybe it was Spirit led after all. I apologies for calling this hypocrite.Oh you do believe it could be spirit led after all? Remember you said it was like what the Catholics do too, so I guess same applies to them. We are too quick to condemn what we do not understand. Humility is a virtue any day,willingness to forgive is its reciprocation,a virtue too. May divine light guide your path Alex. |
' |
superior1: Popes do teach Catholics right?, not all teaching are dogma, right? But all Dogma are documented and binding on Catholics, right?.Dear Friend, Every single teaching of Christ is a dogma. What the church does today is to affirm any teaching that the Holy Spirit has revealed as truth beyond doubt. (Jn16:12-13) I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. "Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will show you things to come". The apostles went about preaching what they've heard or seen, Jesus never wrote down a thing for them, yet all he taught is dogma. |
. |
superior1: No, you are only trying to make a point for your arguments. Paul's instructions are from God's inspiration and those he wrote are scriptures.You are getting confused now, Paul's "instructions are from Gods Inspiration and those he wrote are scripture". So what do you propose about those God's Inspiration he taught by word? Trash them? Lets not forget that you are yet to tell me why you believe the bible as solely Inspired and not the other books I mentioned earlier. |
superior1: . There is no doubt he gave direct instruction to many but what we have on record is scriptureSo we truncate as waste the rest He taught, right? superior1: He told Thessalonians to hold to his verbal and written instructions. I said it is the written instructions that became scriptures (look at the definition of what a scripture is again)And what happens to the verbal? superior1: The bolded is your additionsThat's why it is in bracket, an explanation. |
superior1: Really?, but you saw for 'some of the doctrines, teachings there?'.Same Bible told me that there are some that are not written and I should hold on to them as well 2Thess2:15. You said no, only what is written. Now you contradict the Bible. |
superior1: Jumping from Gospel and looking for backup in Epistles without a line of reference is a terrible way of interpreting the Bible. The account of Jesus life is adequately represented in the Gospel and whatever is not written there is not part of the scripture.hehehehe, it is very clear the evangelist witnessed to more, but did not write all, at various times he must have taught more than what he wrote....in words. Hold on to those as well 2Thess2:15. superior1: The Epistle written to Thessalonians is different from Corinthians and so others, all making and addressing different points. They all represented all Paul's teaching which he received from Jesus Christ. If it is verbal instruction and not written, it is not part of the scriptures.Yet Paul said we should hold on to it as well, you said no. Meanwhile: Scripture - any writing that is regarded as sacred by a religious group. (It does not end with the bible by this definition) |
superior1: To make it easy on you, i will handle your points one at a time. These is 7 translations of that same verse and you should conclude if that leaves room for other materials for doctrineI have searched through all you posted, and not even one version said "Only scripture is useful...". To support this it went further to say we should hold on to all that is taught, both written and non written. |
superior1: Yes and much more, it says the bible is for doctrine, correction. Meaning when talking of doctrine the bible should be usedThe bolded is Your Opinion only, not what it said. There is a difference between "could" and "should" superior1: Exactly, he didnt mention any thing else apart from the bible, so why should we believe there is more?. You can read more in the following placesYou should believe there is more because "And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen" (Jn21:25). Add this to: "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.(2Thess2:15) superior1: 2 Timothy 4Irrelevant quotes cannot help your case, stick to the issue at hand. "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle. superior1: Which post?Yes some were taught in words and not written, so not everything is written in the bible, the bible said so and not Syncan. superior1: You have answer that question yourself, the Bible is the inspired word of God.I answered nothing. How do you know it is the inspired word of God? The Jewish Tanakh also claims to be the word of God and it calls Jesus a false prophet. The quran also claims same and it calls Jesus "one of the messengers" from God. Why did you choose to believe the bible. |
superior1: (I love your move, i was expecting it)1. That post says that everything in the bible is good for doctrine, correction, etc 2. That post did not say that nothing else is good for doctrine, correction etc. 3. That post says that 2thess2:15 is good for doctrine, correction etc.. 4. I asked why bible? and you are answering with what the bible say. |
superior1: I said all practice should be from the BibleWhy? |
superior1: Whereas you can prove from the bible, how Mary got married to both Holy Spirit and Joseph, how he remain a virgin for life (afterall Jesus dropped from her mouth), how Joseph was just a helper, how Jesus brothers were is cousinIt is you who claimed that all you practice is written in the bible. |
Maria-Goretti:Let him continue making claims he cannot prove. Thanks in advance anyway for the book details. |
Maria-Goretti:If you have the full title or the author, do try to post it. |
superior1: Your opinion right?Aha, He is now attaching himself. |
Maria-Goretti:What is it all about? |
superior1: Thanks for coming sirSeems you've forgotten the title of the thread,this is my home zone.You are the stranger, so have a nice journey back. |
superior1: Then this my response to your question tooThen I stay with what I do, you stay with not knowing why I do what I do. |
superior1: Did you read my response above atol especially that i gave nnatom??, now read it and get back to me with the dealI read it and my response is fair enough. If you want to know, then be humble and follow my teaching method. |
mamsong9: Interestingly blasphemous!, so ur god has mother? well I wul like to know who is grater, him or his mother?"Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. (Isaiah7:14) "For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace". (Isaiah9:6) She is human, He is both God and human, She bore Him in her womb. |
superior1: I was typing when you posted this, look at the response i gave up there, sign the deal and lets look at the Bible together, ok?Your response does not hold, you asked a question about what i do, so I am the teacher and you are the learner, I should determine how to guide you through it. I want to start from the beginning. If someone ask me to prove with the book of Judaism one thing or the other, why should I be bound to do that? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 (of 129 pages)