₦airaland Forum

LegalWolf:
What language did I tell you it’s a direct translation of?

LegalWolf:
If you are not a liar and hypocrite, why can’t u answer a very short and simple question. Yahya again is NOT an Hebrew name. it’s a cognate of the word “ahyu” and literally translates to “He lives (on)”.

I’ve tried to explain this as if I am explaining to an imbec*le but characteristic of Christians, you keep acting dumb. And I’ll answer your questions, but you will answer mine too.

You were the one who lied and said Yahya means the fraudster called yhwh lives on. And you’re yet to prove it and my question still stands !!!

LegalWolf:
Mr. Man, It’s not a question of ifs, please. And stop running around like a mad man out of medications. The question is there begging for answer and don’t be a fraud by asking me dumb questions. Answer my question first

LegalWolf:
And the question still lives on unanswered 'O YOU ACKNWOLEDGE, BASED ON EVIDENCE CITED, THAT YAHYA IS NOT AN HEBREW NAME ..?

LegalWolf:
Mr. Man, the question is simple - DO YOU ACKNWOLEDGE, BASED ON EVIDENCE CITED, THAT YAHYA IS NOT AN HEBREW NAME . All these long, time-wasting, circuitous and irrational emotional outburst is not the answer you weasel!

LegalWolf:
TenQ it is even quite dumb. You asked me two questions and I answered one and I am asking you to either confirm or deny the answer and you have been dodging the question like someone whose lips have leprosy. Goddamn answer the Question and stop being a wuss you christian yo-yo!

LegalWolf:
TenQ it is even quite dumb. You asked me two questions and I answered one and I am asking you to either confirm or deny the answer and you have been dodging the question like someone whose lips have leprosy. Goddamn answer the Question and stop being a wuss you christian yo-yo!

LegalWolf:
Mr. Man, the question is simple - DO YOU ACKNWOLEDGE, BASED ON EVIDENCE CITED, THAT YAHYA IS NOT AN HEBREW NAME . All these long, time-wasting, circuitous and irrational emotional outburst is not the answer you weasel!

LegalWolf:
Lol, why are you scared of first acknowledging Yahya is not John after evidence proferred?? ? Mine is to hammer out your lie and show to the world that you are an hypocrite, a liar and a disgraceful bunch. The same way you wiggled your way around debating the fraud of a bible or yhwh that is exactly the same way you are running after being busted that Yahya is not John.

Afterall, sixfiguresmart was caught lying and he is not dead. You won't die after being bursted. Just answer the goddamn simple question and stop running like a roasted witch

LegalWolf:
Lol, back to the simple question do you acknowledge based on uncontroverted evidence I cited that Yahya is not the arabic rendition of John

LegalWolf:
Oh really How many Yahya do Muslims have?

In order to answer that part of your question that has to do with 'It seems you are referring to a different Yahya". I am referring to the Yahya mentioned in the Quran which you referenced before .

You cannot be smart by half because logic is antithetical to christianity. Now answer the question

LegalWolf:
Lol, one at a time. Back to the simple question I asked you do you acknowledge based on uncontroverted evidence I cited that Yahya is not the arabic rendition of John .
It is a yes or no answer... Does not involve two much intellectual ability (not that you have it though)

LegalWolf:
Lol, you asked two questions didn't you? And I answered one. So back to the question o you acknowledge based on uncontroverted evidence I cited that Yahya is not the arabic rendition of John .

Just a simple question. Why are you bitching around?

LegalWolf:
TenQ, when you are debating with me, I would never let you hide you weasel! You carefully ran away from debating the authorship of the bible despite several pleas. You have managed to ask me two questions of which I have been graceful to answer one with distinction.

Now, do you acknowledge based on uncontroverted evidence I cited that Yahya is not the arabic rendition of John ?

LegalWolf:
Lol, calm down Mr. man. One by one christianity succeeded as a forgery 2000 thousand years ago because its adherents were dumb and lazy. The same attraction has made people like you flock to it. You asked two questions initially and I have answered one. But before the second, do you acknowledge based on uncontroverted evidence I cited that Yahya is not the arabic rendition of John ?

At least I answered one of your question and I am prepared to move to the second. So you answer mine

LegalWolf:
The simple question you have not answered is - what were you trying to prove with that quote??

LegalWolf:
Hahahahahahaha....is that all you can say now when logic fails you?

LegalWolf:
Lol, calm down Mr. man. One by one christianity succeeded as a forgery 2000 thousand years ago because its adherents were dumb and lazy. The same attraction has made people like you flock to it. You asked two questions initially and I have answered one. But before the second, do you acknowledge based on uncontroverted evidence I cited that Yahya is not the arabic rendition of John ?

At least I answered one of your question and I am prepared to move to the second. So you answer mine

LegalWolf:
That question should be directed to you who have been doing every single thing to run away from discussing authorship of the bible...The question which you have not answered is 'what were you attempting to prove with that quote'? Simple

LegalWolf:
You are an hypocrite and a liar. I have try to prove the Quran with the bible or not with the quote Don't be a weasel

LegalWolf:
So what were you attempting to do here 'by appealing to the Authority of Allah and the Quran' Come let see which lie you are going to tell this time. You want to be a fraudster and it is my duty to show the world that you are a liar! Again what were you attempting to do here?

LegalWolf:
The Wheat must be separated from the Chaff and that what sets Muslims apart from Christians. We are painstaking meticulous (if not pedantic) in matters of faith. We check sources and scrutinized it and that was why I keep telling guys I debate with that the NT would never have made it that far if it were to be an hadith. It is pure forgery.

It was initially sixfiguresmart that I wanted to jealously guide to the path of self-ruin. I just saw you as a distraction which needed to be quickly taken of. You jumped into the middle of a conversation like an imbec1lic Yo-Yo and now you have my attention.

I cited a work for you written 20 years ago. You did not dispute the source. You did not dispute the encyclopaedia judaica they cited. You did not dispute the Arabic bibles they cited. You did not dispute the Tafsir of Ibn Kathir and all other Islamic sources they cited. IN SUMMARY, YOU DID NOT IMPEACH ANY OF THESE SOURCES CLEARLY SHOWING THAT THE NAME OF JOHN IN ARABIC IS YUHANNA'

Rather, like a crying baby with no functional sense, all you could say is I '[i]...went to cite a reference written 20 years ago by liars like yourself as your proof: Of all available Tafsirs, you couldn't find one! [/u] So because a work was written 20 years ago means I cannot rely on it? Or what exactly is the point you are trying to prove with that statement?

Then again, who is the deceptive liar. Unlike your discredited ally sixfiguresmart, I showed clear proof of what your Arabic bible refers to as John. It didn't call it Yahya but the gospel according to John is titled 'Suratul Yuhanna'. After all, It was not me that wrote it. Or Arab christians not christian enough?

So you are just pure cruise, vibes and in sha Allah and throwing tantrums won't save you and your yhwh from the path of perdition. And like I told sixfiguresmart, if this will last for a thousand years, I will die on this hill. With all said and done, the question of whether the Bible was inspired or forged still lingers on unanswered...

LegalWolf:
Just a second, I have your time. I will go ahead and quote you on all these posts. You have proved to be an hypocrite. Now you are joining sixfiguresmart or six figure dumb to show you are liar. I will reduce you from 10 to zero Q and show the world how questionable your character is

Cmanforall:
FG also failed the entire nation including the educational sector

God1000:
This is amazing, I'm still mystified by China's rapid technological rise.

Why can't we build something like this in Nigeria?
Where are the nigerians that went to Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge, MIT, Stanford, etc
They can only speak big English

LegalWolf:
At TenQ, I don’t like quoting people more than once and you are NOT OBLIGED to respond to this post. But for innocent observers out there who would stumble on this post and to keep the records straight for posterity, I will implore you to.

Why do you enjoy making circuitous argument. That turns you into a clown. You want to prove the Bible through the Quran and yet you are claiming the Quran is lying. Let me break it down to you so you’ll see how it sounds.

Imagine I assert that yhwh sanctions incest. What is my proof - Genesis 20:12 where our lovely “father Abraham” married his sister. Instinctively, I expect you to come to a defense of this verse (logically speaking, I don’t know what defence you can put up).

But imagine you come up with a defence, say “oh that’s not true LegalWolf, yhwh banned incest in the book of…” Don’t you think it does not lie in my mouth to say the Bible is lying and keep insisting incest is sanctioned by yhwh?

I have appealed to the bible to prove that incest is sanctioned by yhwh. You have [highlight]putatively used biblical verses to disprove it.[/highlight] Saying that the Bible is lying without bringing any other biblical authority is clutching on straws or what do you think??

You have complete lack of knowledge of a Islam. I’m doing you unpaid tutorial on quranic exegesis. Worse still, you’ve not taken your time to research on the foundation of your religion and you have the nerves to say I’m lying? I’m running away from debate? Worse still, a debate with a Christian (of all groups on earth) ? That is insulting and a take exception to that

Finally, since you have failed to demonstrate that the Quran confirms the bible, would you now let us go to the arena on how the Bible came be what it is?

LegalWolf:
Lol, this your emotional outburst is for people without brain. Certainly not me. Ive come down to the level of an imbec*le to explain to you but you still don’t get it. You keep deliberating fooling around and that won’t save you.

Again, for emphasis. YAHYA IS NOT AN HEBREW
NAME AND NOT IN ANY WAY SIMILAR TO YOHANNAN . This is the fallacy you keep making and I have debunked it on several occasions.

The name Yahya was referenced in the Quran as a name Allah has never given anyone before. It is NOT in any way similar to John. How on earth can I stress this enough??!!!!!!!!!!

And to top it up, I’m not the first to say this. Unlike sixfiguresmart, I won’t lie to defend Islam as it a beautiful and perfect religion. The truth will stand out for itself. Let me cite just one source from clearly debunking that Yahya is remotely similar to Yohannan

[https://www.islamic-awareness.org/quran/contrad/external/yahya] (This is just one of others I can cite. This Article was written at least 22 years ago.)

As you will agree with me, contending LegalWolf is lying by claiming Yahya is not an Hebrew name is clearly not true as Muslim scholars have been saying this way before today. My claim is not outlandish and neither is it a lie, is it? Again, if you say I’m lying and I point you out to other sources saying exactly the same thing, would that amount to a lie?

I’m not sixfiguresmart and you can take my words to the bank when I’m debating with a Christian. Not a Jew, atheist or Hindu but with a Christian. Every single word I say.

You keep being evasive. I have submitted myself to a debate and a conversation on all the issues you have with the Quran and Islam. But I am unwilling to take on the assumption that the Bible is a holy book and I want to demolish that basis. So who patently is afraid here ?

Cmanforall:
ASUU have lost public sympathy

Do Nigerians know these ASUU lecturers are still being paid or will still receive their full salaries even while on strike?

Who would lose in all these?
STUDENTS

If during the strike the lecturers used it to work on and improve on their curriculum, then it may not be total loss for students as they will get updated information

BeardGangJnr1:
FG rendered ASUU handicapped already,
Xccept u are hatching a plan to disobey dual Court orders....u have zero options other than resuming... regardless of the offer presented to UU, by FG (Buhari, Ngige and Reps speaker)
.

Unfortunately, NLC leadership is occupied by wannabe politicians...!
.

Appeal court simply said, Obey before complain
.

If u check very well....there wasn't any significant changes in the content the Reps speaker presented and what the FG renegotiated, ergo students shouldn't have been kept this Long at home.
We all yearn for the betterment of our citadels of learning...mind UU, I'm not taking sides.

guobe:
WHICH FIGHT DID THEY WIN.PEOPLE THAT SUCCEEDED IN MAKING NIGERIAN UNIVERSITIES A STIGMA IN THE EDUCATION WORLD.NO FOREIGN INSTITUTION WILL EVER TAKE NIGERIAN CERTIFICATES SERIOUS AGAIN BY THE ACTION OF ASUU FIGHTING FOR THEIR POCKETS.

LegalWolf:
This your circuitous argument is puerile and lame. I assumed you were 5 and an imbec*le and I broke it down to you to that level. Even I take you for mad man, still you won’t learn.

You’ve been the one wasting my time and I shall give you all the attention you wanted. Just a couple of questions:

- Why appeal to an authority that would not support you. What was in dispute was “yahya” and having given you clear cut evidence that It is not from any impotent yhwh is ungracious, you’ve gone ahead to be ranting like a castrated dog.

- Let’s assume you’re talking to a kid. You said yours is to poke and show me the big hole in the Quran. Apparently, you want to elicit a “defence” from me knowing well I am a Muslim. Isn’t it?

- Thirdly, all your circumnavigation of the issues won’t save you. Or let me phrase it this way, for the sake of this argument, I am taking the assumption that the Bible is divinely inspired.

- All I will do is to SHOW YOU with clear cut evidence that the bible cannot be divinely inspired as it is a bag of sh1te written by anonymous persons.

- Going by your logic, you’re not to “defend” the authenticity of the Bible or yhwh at all. Is that fine too?

guobe:
THIS ASUU PEOPLE ARE JUST JOKERS.THEY HAD AMPLE TIME TO LOBY THE GOVERNMENT WHICH I HAVE BEEN TELLING THEM SINCE BUT MESSED IT UP.THE COURT HAVE FINALLY HUMBLED THEM ITS NOW THEY WANT TO LOBY.WHO WILL TAKE THEM SERIOUS NOW.A GBALAJIMA NEGOTIATION IS DIFFERENT FROM A TOP TO BOTTOM NEGOTIATION.THESE ASUU PROFESSORS ARE SO DULL.GUSH.

lapazi:
this doesnt make sense
how can u not work and expect to get paid
they will definitely do it again
this govt never learns

BeardGangJnr1:
FG rendered ASUU handicapped already,
Xccept u are hatching a plan to disobey dual Court orders....u have zero options other than resuming... regardless of the offer presented to UU, by FG (Buhari, Ngige and Reps speaker)

OnionBandit:
If Buhari 's government pays them for the months spent gallivanting around doing nothing, I will withdraw my total support for this administration..I would rather support the failed brewery investor with a second class in philosophy than wish for a continuity of this nonsense

Everybody just dey do as dem like for this administration despite the fact that Buhari is so fatherly and understanding.