Tonyet1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Tonyet1's Profile › Tonyet1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 (of 77 pages)
KunleOshob:what a pity Bro! so u now know say 'SHOES GETS SIZE' , whether she is Pilgrim1 or Pilgrimage100 does it matter, wat matters is your ability to beat a thousand of IDs with you knowledge irrespective of their aliases or disguise pls no fall my hand oh! ![]() |
ttalks:Do you have a problem with that ![]() |
Zikkyy:Yes in a way, Nay in another way How i mean: Yes in the sense that the custom (QAL) dated way back b4 the mosaic introduction (PIEL) Nay in the sense that the mosaic introduction showed us the blessing tied in the practise (TERUMUOT) The two both plays a role of helping us know the subject better and brighter do you understand, and by the way WAS TITHING REFERRED TO AS A LAW, pls answer this ![]() Zikkyy:Now you've spoken well, yes one should be inspired based on the origin of the custom (MA' ASER) and not on the blessing attached |
Zikkyy:I havent said there is or there should be any intermediary btw us and Christ, pls dont misquote me, rather i said Today when we give tithe, the Men of God (levites after the order of Christ) receives it with prayers and presents it to Christ (Priest after the order of melchisedek who received tithe). The statement does not sound like there was any intermediary, rather it does sound like there was someone who is assigned to have leadership over us and thus should help administer things in the Sanctuary. well in furtherance, it all depends on where you're trying to look at it from, if i were to answer you, then i'll say in relationship we do not need any intermediary (heb.4:16), but in administeration YES we do need intermediaries (Act.4, Acts.6),Pls Zikky dont come up here and start asking me questions like 'why should we have heads or someone who should help us administer when we ourselves could do it' as that question could mean funny. because b4 you start asking it, you should atleast ask yourself what roles were the LEVITES called to do in the mosaic time, were they intermediaries or helpmates, ask yourself again. And what roles was Peter,disciples, deacons, elders called to play was it not to help in receiving things from the people and presenting it to God? Acts 4:35 : And laid it at the feet of the apostles (special messengers). Then distribution was made according as anyone had need. AMP The way you guys ask questions really baffle me, or maybe the word levites, priests, and others sound too heavy to hear by you guys as you need someone to tell you that still yet in the early church some folks assumed these offices though with different names. read greek interpretations of the offices again and maybe we wont be asking such questions. I can go on and on quoting more examples of intermediaries, but i know allwill be to no avail. come to even think of it, maybe you guys should start paying me for my lectures sef , lol joking! |
Zikkyy:Glad you know now, that's why this thread was created |
Zikkyy:Then we dont have an argument, or do we, as anything else would mean creating a new topic. |
[size=13pt]this aint questions, but sha I'll entertain all of em' by grace of YHWH questions next week [/size] |
chukwudi44:Just a typical example of the reason why i refrain from answering people like you, Chukwudi44 my friend, why are your posts always filled with insults and abuses, they portrait sighns of immaturity you know, the best you can do is not to answer anyone rather than raining bitterness. it aint right. God bless you! ![]() |
KunleOshob: Yes, u are right Bro! but wait a second, you're beginning to act way more funnier you know , you seem to be going out of the thread. well wat ever! ![]() |
ogajim:KunleOshod my dearest friend, i do not understand what you mean by misquoting yourself, believe me, where did i quote Matt.23:9, i cant seem to understand again, believe me. ![]() ogajim:KunleOshod is begging, i thought you said 'no retreat no surrender' to your claims, then go ahead na |
I wish we both discuss this thing at length save for time and my duty calls, just the two of us for now, ok? pardon my lengthy posts pls Zikkyy:- Zikkyy they aint no agenda to achieve but that of simply knowing the truth about something, one of the most gr8test lessons ever taught me by my dad is 'not to blindly follow a crowd, but be withdrawn in prudency to study a thing because thats the place of distinction and honor'. From origin, i asked myself 2questions about this thing called 'tithe' and the questions were 1. What really is titheing? 2. Why do people tithe? I go to church and see believers raise some funny envelopes especially when announcements for titheing is made , and then they give, now what really amazed me was that amongst the tithers were some that were blessed more and some were declining seriously unto poverty, then i asked: 'if tithing was such a big thing that gives prosperity then why doesnt mr.A gets blessed as does Mr.b. could there be a problem no addressed or could this thing called titheing be such a scam? Then i began tithing without having any knowledge wahtsoever about tithing, as all i know was that "when i tithe, God will open the gates of heaven and shower his blessings on me", believe me i started prospering and making success as i wrote in my intro-comment. But one thing was missing in me and that meant that i could easily deviate just as i was introduced simply because i lack any knowledge about what i was practising. Some few years later, sometime early this year i stopped tithing because i went online and saw materials that seriously spoke ill about this practise and then i stopped tithing obviously based on the reasons i saw from articles and writers. Zikkyy my friend within a space of 6mths i suffered lack, when i say lack i literally begged for N10 to buy myself a digestive biscuit to eat for a whole day, i earn very well but then i just couldnt explain how my salary gets exhausted within a week, is it sickness, misfortunes,wear-n-tear,dejection, victim of theft to mention but a few, i suffered many other things i wont want to come up here and start saying in the open. yes i know this lack and suffering i had could be experienced by all even of those who tithe, while again some few who do not tithe could still be blessed too. But then we both know that when we give offering God tells us he will bless us, isn’t it? But then how come Cain and Abel both offered, and Abels own was accepted and Cains rejected, this could mean that believers could tithe and still suffer penury because of how they gave to God. 1 Tim 1:13-14 >>Acts.17:30 - "In the day of ignorance God will overlook. . ."but then its one thing to do a thing in ignorance and another with full knowledge as the latter could mean rebellion, look at what the scriptures say here >>Romans.2:1 - "Thou art inexcusable, O man. . .thus i suffered more because i had no excuse as the nominal christians do, and around July i was watching a program on TBN with Gregory Dickow, he is my mentor, and he was teaching about tithes and its relevance and advised christians to do a thorough study about things lest they misbehave and abuse alot of spiritual things (which is the brain child behind this thread) and he began opening my eyes to alot of things many MOGs doesnt know and as such can not preach as all they tend to know and preach about tithes were strictly from Malachi, i dont blame them sha i see alot of our Nigeria MOGs as greedy folks that have abused this practise and made us look like idiots b4 the WORLD After his teaching i resorted to taking my time to gather materials, I even bought Greek and Hebrew versions of the bible to back my study, and with this materials i have been writing all thru' this thread [li] MY UNDESTANDING OF TITHE[/li] TITHEA better rendering for the original word "ma`aser" means a standard of parting one's possession into 10 places and given 1/10th to a superior person and this act is called ~~~~~ . Some ancient writings say it could also mean an act of worship to a diety as appreciation, a solicitation, an enquiry, an appeasement. Babylonians practised it, the ancient moab tribes and other ancient tribes did too. A lot of this tribes if not all tribes still hold this practice till date. Even the romans did it too, and also introduced it into their economic and administrative systems as what we call TAX today, ask me and I’ll say it was not borrowed from the bible but rather from their ancestors. Do you understand? Some scholars even argue that the offerings given by Abel was a tithe of his livestock if you compare what he offered and what God commanded the Israelites in Num.18. well let me don’t go there lest KunleOshod and my anti-tithing friends come up crying foul at me again. I am only writing this here as I see you as one matured folk I have esteemed you since your first writing here on this thread). [li] ABRAHAMIC TITHE[/li] there are 3 kinds of tithes, we have the QAL, PIEL, HIPHIL Qal’ (Give a tenth portion) refer to the original act of titheing which was given by the head patriach (Abraham) of whose descendant the Christ will come, which is to give a tenth of one’s spoils and booties, and mind you this spoils and booties could mean gold, silver, garments, diamonds, livestocks , crops and other farm produces and all that one could possess that one possesses (Your first son or first child inclusive).Even Abraham could be said to have tithed 2wice, that of Melchisedek and that of giving up Isaac. Hope you now see why I laugh at Chukwudi and KunleOshod and their likes each time they argue here with questions like WHY SHOULD TITHING BE IN MONEY. In ancient days what do they use in trading if not gold, silver, cowries as is what some villages and rurals still use in trading, and making their coins for commerce. Yes we do not have any biblical account of anyone tithing again aside the promised tithe by Jacob, but scriptural intuition will tell you that this act continued through the descendants of Abraham – Isaac – Jacob and beyond.Else ask yourself if Jacob was not taught tithing then how did he know about the practice such that he even made a promise of it. My believe in the biblios is that not all things were over-emphasized because a word is enough for a wise person, else if all were then >>John 21:25- . . . I suppose that even the world itself could not contain (have room for) the books that would be written. AMPThe Biblios (i.e. the bible) is a document that contains facts/ figures about life’s experience regarding a context(s) quote me anywhere. [li]MELCHISEDEK AND JESUS CHRIST[/li] This is one place i hold a strong argument backing tithe and its relevance. I have explained it here before but the antis pretended they did not see this part If you take the time to read thru’ the bible you’ll see that God’s relationship with man followed a pattern and this pattern has standards that both parties must follow for a true relationship What were this patterns?: 1. There must be a Person who mediates btw God and Man (read.Heb.7:17-20)Enoch played this role but Mechisedek was the first to assume this office of which Samuel, Nathan,and awhole lot of others, Job too did the same (Job.1:5), thereafter Abraham (Gen.18:20-33),Abraham’s lineage and then to Jacob’s and later to Moses and the trail followed until Jesus’s time 2. Now carefully take the time to study what each of this persons/priest/princes did, One was that they gave offerings as a means of worship/relationship and they offered sacrifices which were meant to make atonement for sins, two they taught the people how to relate with God and Man, which if you agree with me a little account of their acts was given of some of these few men who assumed the office of the priest. 3. Now One practice the bible noted that some of these princes/priests did was the act of paying tithe, take for example Melchisedek received tithe, Abraham gave tithe, Jacob promised tithe, Nehemiah ordered tithe, Moses instituted Tithe, Jesus rebuked hypocrites of wrong titheing but approved it in his comment “the later you are suppose to keep not despising the former(tithe)- Matt.23:23” 4. Now the question is this? What is the relevance of titheing since I said it remains a practice that should still be relevant in the scriptures one may ask, Titheing is as significant as Offering is but the chasm is that the later was given freely while the former has followed an standard (a specific amount), now that’s what I meant by standard. Now Melshicedek received tithe, and Bible said Jesus was made a priest after the order of melchisedek, have you really ask yourself this, that if Jesus Christ was a priest after Melchisedek and melchisedek received tithe, then what was expected of Jesus Christ Malkiy-TsedeqThis order could be compared as Aaron and the levites relationship as melchisedek and Christ)-Heb.7:16, Aaron received it under the law; likewise the levites took it from the people and gave it to the High priest whom Aaron fell into. Today when we give tithe, the Men of God (levites after the order of Christ) receives it with prayers and presents it to Jesus Christ (Priest after the order of melchisedek who received tithe) Read Hebrews.6, 7,8 again, Someone said that when the bible said Christ was a priest after the ORDER of Melchisedek it meant that he was like Melchisedek, I accept this , but only for the sake that we are yet to see the meaning of the word ORDER as used in that passage. Take a look at this, the term order means taxis in Hebrew meaning to follow/be drawn after a succession 1. taxis "an arranging, arrangement, order" (akin to tasso, "to arrange, draw up in order"But what a lot of folks seem to understand of that word ORDER is different as what that passage used it for, this is what others understand of that word epidiorthoo NT:1930, "to set in order" (epi "upon," dia, "through, intensive," and orthos, "straight" A priest after the order of Melchisedec[li] MOSAIC TITHE[/li] This act was Piel, meaning an instruction given to be followed, hmmm I gat to go now. I will continue tomorrow my dear friend, bye and God bless you But pls read below what I wrote about giving it could help us out you know! Giving have been divided into three kinds: |
adefash: Bro, i have gone thru' that URL and there aint nothing new from what anti-tithers argue with as a case, another dumb link you've got there ![]() |
chukwudi44:gooosh, i cant help it but say that your posts are always so daft! can you give me a wider explanation to your claim, was tithing a law, why should a non-law practise abolish with the law, so do you wish to tell me that offerings abolished too, afterall it existed b4 the law and it existed in the law. When will peeps know the difference btw the law and a standard! hmmmmm, chukwudi44, pls read your bible and not a pamflet issued during masses, ok ![]() |
ttalks:1. Were have we been thru' that before, i ask you? 2. since you are dragging me and viaro together, then dat means you prolly have nothing to offer henceforth you should mop ok?3. Did you say viaro did * with me? ![]() Brother, i have explained alot here and still willing to explain even though peeps like you wont listen,does it matter? wat i believe is right is what i do cheers! ![]() |
ttalks:And i am still standing on the fact of Matt.23:23, [size=14pt]"you should show mercy yes, you should be faithful yes, you should show fairness yes, and should you tithe also yes" (Hebrew- english paraphrased version)[/size] now those this verse seem/look like a voluntary statement i ask? never-say-die-brethrens like ttalks, zzikky, kunleOshod wat else do you want me to say, go back and study tithes better for yourself, not from anti-tithers but neutral and wise minded folks. God bless you! ![]() Nice to have you back, aw u dey na? ![]() |
Zikkyy:You see why i say you seem confused from the origin, where have i said we should tithe based on what our MOGs teach us, go back to the very first post and read my intro comment again, i said there that i used to simply base my believes on what they(MOGs ) say but after all and sundry i resorted to studying this issue myself. read almost all my posts here and you'l find out that its either i refer to greek, hebrew/aramaic teachings of the topic and most importanly that of the biblios, and not what Oyedepo, or chris, or adeboye or kumuyi teaches. lest i forget noce to have you back bro, i specially kept some questions for you while you're gone ![]() |
rabzy:Who says? show me where it was stated in the bible rabzy:Ok so is that the reason why you say it is not relevant? rabzy:what scriptures Sir? |
Hello Mr.KunleOshod(insultive-guy) am still waiting for your answer to my queestion ![]() |
@Kunleoshod, do you give offerings, if yes , with what? and pls show me scriptures that says you should give in that mode, and also lest i forget am glad you didnt deny the claim winky winky ![]() |
Why am i force to think that we have another KunleOshod[size=13pt]2[/size] hiding behind the screen of a finger believe me i aint no fool ![]() |
For once i will accept Tudors 1st comment that this thread is all the more another baseless thread, with everyother creaving to make his religion look all the more appealing than the other @ Shakerz posts, Respect to you brother, but i stand to say some few lines of yours i disagree as i can bet you that our small brains,minds and hearts can never phantom God, knowledge of God spans beyond philosophies, spans beyond freethinking, and above all logics. The ancients dreaded HIM so much so that no one felt it worthy to mention the name, rather they related it to another with an inscription that looks like 'YHWH' when written on tabularisers/ bookmarks/ caves/ slates, until scholars came in to add vowel to give a pronounciation hence the name YAHWEH, after the translation of aramaics to hebrew, it became JEHOVAH, God is just a tag for expressing the personality of the SUPREME DIETY. do you understand? I pray i can have enough time to explain some few things here [li] ADAMIC VIEW OF YHWH ATTRIBUTES [/li] - In Genesis it was explained that '. . .the lord made them male and female', '. . the lord came in the cool of the day. . ." this texts and others in the early genesis of the ancient scrolls in the original hebrew script referred to YWHW as DUNAMUUS, meaning the indwelling of a force in human called the YWHW consciousness" with this it became evident by those of old that YWHW is first of all EEL INVINCIBLE (meaning a spirit) - Not too long Man fell, and when EEL INVINCIBLE visited Sin has shown up, with that we saw how YWHW passed a judgement on ET ELOOHYIIM (Meaning a lower god after the order of YHWH ELOOHYIIM, which is where Adam and all Mankind fall under), now after this judgement, some scribes argue that it was here YHWH showed himself as a PUNISHER of EVIL, so anyone saying God in the OT is different from the NT on the subject of heaven and hell is wrong, becos HE showed his very nature also from the ORIGIN OF BOOKS (genesis) - Later again still yet in the early Genesis , you'll recall that a time came when Cain and Abel offered unto YHWH, and one's sacrifice was preferred to the other, God was seen here as YWHW of SACRIFICE i feel like going on and on but for time,now the crux of my argument to all em' muslims, buddism and so more, if you go back to study the very root of your religions, you'll all agree that Mankind fell yes you're right, again you'll all agree that sin spread to all yes you're right, you'll also say that offering and sacrifices are made to atone for sins, but where you all fail to see it is that how potent has this sacrifice and offerings to clean the vry sinful nature of mankind. This is where the finale of all GOD-CREAVING comes in play in the overview, 1. ELOOHYIIM (God) created ET ELOOHYIIM (Adam/ Man), spirit made a spirit and put it in a vessel 2. ELOOHYIIM gave instructions, yet Man disobeyed 3. Man fell and lost the full potents of his very nature (bible said 'for the day you eat of this you shall die' meaning the spiritual nature of Man lost its source) 4. Heaven is God's throne, Earth is Man's abode 5. Spirits dwell in heaven with Celestial bodies (book of corinthians), while spirits dwell on earth with terrestial bodies. 6. Man fell still yet in his terrestial body, therefore a saviour( whether from the celestial or otherwise) must come in this terrestial body (flesh) to lead this fallen mankind 7. All attributes of this saviour must meet the very nature of the two kindreds, hence the sayings about Jesus as A CARPENTER YET A KING (very opposite yet true if you understand this overview) 8. This Saviour must compromise his very flesh to show unto others a standard, bible says something like . . "been sown in corruption(flesh) and raised in incorruption (the rebirth of the original 'el elooyhiim') " 9. Mind you if you think God will not punish man in hell, you're wrong, recall if he could destroy sodom and gomorrah (JUDAISM), if he could destroy the world in Noah's time(JUDAISM), if he could destroy those who mormored against Moses (JUDAISM) will HIS VERY NATURE CHANGE >>For i am the Lord that changeth not |
Also to add, TLB bible version puts it this way >>>Gen 2:9: The Lord God planted all sorts of beautiful trees there in the garden, trees producing the choicest of fruit. At the center of the garden he placed the Tree of Life, and also the Tree of Conscience, giving knowledge of Good and Bad. TLB I personally believe amongst those trees were SPIRITUAL ones and PHYSICAL ones, and not all physical as some may think, Adam and Eve could be likened as Little babies who have the seed of conscience in them from birth but should use it when they are matured, which was what God had in mind, but not what happened |
KunleOshod, Ogajim and all anti-tithers, I feel lightened to write, thus i will as the spirit of God gives me unction, @Ogajim, I chose to address you first becos you seem to be offensive,which is my turn on, if i can guess right, then i think your major arguments are simply as a result of you not understanding the scriptures at least to a point of explainng it to another. Let me TEACH you some things here: 1st: - Do you realize that the BIBLE in the original greek ('biblios') means a document that summates basic and importants facts/history yet not all. (check the dictionary or better still quote me anywhere) The Holy Bible is a document that summates basic and important facts yet not all happenings (quote me anywhere,or better still refer to John 21:25) as it appears your arguments always come from the fact that becos Jesus never emphasized a thing twice simply meant it aint important, or becos he spake it to the pharisees meant it doesnt apply to us as someone put it. Now i ask you, pls Ogajim and probably your co's, pls show me where Jesus christ or anyother disciples outrightly emphasized OFFERINGS, and i said OFFERING and not GIVING, would you need a daft to explain that that GIVING would mean BOTH OFFERINGS AND TITHINGS, yet you dont get it! when we give alms doesnt it fall under GIVING? when we give offerings doesnt it fall under GIVING? so why would a tenth of your possession bcome such a big ripple? I feel compulsed to explain GIVING here GIVING The general name for which in Hebrew is <START HEBREW>/b*r=q*<END HEBREW>, korban', although several other words are so rendered) is anything presented to God as a means of conciliating his favor(check or refer to a hebrew dictionary); which being in the Jewish, as well as in all other religions, considered as the one thing needful, has always constituted an essential part of public worship and private piety. In the treatment of this topic I’ll bring together. the ancient information with whatever light modern research has thrown upon it.\ Giving have been divided into three kinds: 1. Impletratoria, denoting those which are designed to procure some favor or benefit, which is where the HIPHIL falls in,meaning an act to provoke anther act as was shown in Mal.3 2. Eucharistica, those which are expressive of gratitude for bounties or mercies received; this is where the Abraham tithing fall (which in hebrew means QAL - giving out of gratitude) 3. Piacularia, those which are meant to atone for sins and propitiate the Deity, this is where we have the SIN offering, BURNT offering, HEAVE offering all fall under also called PIEL, this is usually in form of an instruction, as was also the TITHES instructed by the Israelites Pls b4 you start arguing on who tithed and who never tithed, was it aborted or still relevant,it will be wise to understand where all givings fall under Thanks for now, lest i forget Viaro, you are doing a great job |
@ poster, I was also told the church has its won bible called BOOK OF MORMONS , is it true? |
jagunlabi:Brother you're slightly wrong on that, the trouble and problem we face in the world were all birthed by folks who think they can do it, when the bible tells us to do the opposite, let me show you >>>Proverbs 3:5 - [size=15pt]Trust in the LORD with all thine heart[/size]; [size=13pt]and lean not unto thine own understanding.[/size] @Poster, Answer is yes!God can save but only those who believe He(God) can save them! |
Chuwkudi44 my friend, you'll have to experience it b4 you understand it, believe me! |
@Poster, Since you've seen straight explanations from someone here to answer the topic, wont it be rather nice you call the thread quit? or you want to turn it into another classroom session of slimings and baseless arguments? |
Even though i dont really have anything against Umaru, but i still think that [li] For one to provide a sound Administration, it requires that such a person should be sound in all totality both mentally, intellectuallyand of most importance, such a person should be sound PHYSICALLY[/li] [li] Where Umaru would have functioned well was if he had met a good nigeria, not a bad one like we have presently, that would require a lot of strength, vigor and power to manage[/li] [li] Nigeria is about the largest black nation of [U] THE WORLD [/u], we aint like togo nor zaire nor gabon with gross popu. of <10million were even a 14yrs old boy given power and authority can lead, we are >180million for christ sake, [u]sad it is to know that THE LEADER OF THIS ACCLAIMED LARGEST BLACK NATION OF THE WORLD IS A SICK MAN[/U] [/LI] In my opinion, Umaru came at the wrong time to a wrong place thru' a wrong means as a wrong person, well May God help Nigeria! |
@ Ogajim and KunleOshod, i pormise to reply you guys when i m free for my break today stay blessed! |
Maybe i should start becoming all the more cautious with my posts lest they assume that TONYE-T = VIARO = BOBBYAF = GENTLEME = all pro-tithers One person said Tonye-t = Viaro ![]() another said Viaro = Pilgrim 1 ![]() another said Tonye-t = Ludacrious ![]() while yet another Tonye-t = Gentle Me when these are peeps i barely even know anything about, the best is to check our post or a good moderator should check from the backgroundPharisees said Jesus Christ = Belizebulb One day they will say that Tonye-t = seun ![]() May God help me! ![]() |
Yeah Ttalks good morning, your observations were truly right, i wasnt really myself yesterday, cocky i guess, i cant seem to tell what sprolled in me, i was going thru' my post i made to Jesoul (my sister), KunleOshod(my stubborn brother), Kellorah and Ogajim (my new friends) and they got me laffing , i prolly must have burst some balls yesterday. pls i sincerely apologize to everyone shit happens, we aint perfect!.i will provide proofs to this claim of the TOPIC when i m free today hopefully! Stay blessed! |
@ Jesoul, Are all dis false accusations and insults really necessary? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 (of 77 pages)

it won't raise an hair of my chest. As i said earlier my campaign againts the evil, greedy twisted and heretical false doctrine of tithes remains my christian obligation as the scam is bringing christianity into disrepute and some of us are still interested in protecting the integrity of the faith.
henceforth you should mop