₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,329,982 members, 8,443,307 topics. Date: Saturday, 11 July 2026 at 02:48 PM

Toggle theme

Tonyet1's Posts

Nairaland ForumTonyet1's ProfileTonyet1's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 (of 77 pages)

Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 12:21pm On Oct 31, 2009
KunleOshob:
I am still very much around on the thread but i decided to slow down on my posting since that silly girl pilgrim.1 resurfaced under a pseudonym. She brings out the worst in me and her outright deliberate dis-honesty always makes my skin crawl with my head wanting to explode hence the reason i restrain myself from posting less i denegrate to an abusive dunce like her.
what a pity Bro! so u now know say 'SHOES GETS SIZE'  cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy , whether she is Pilgrim1 or Pilgrimage100 does it matter, wat matters is your ability to beat a thousand of IDs with you knowledge irrespective of their aliases or disguise  wink wink  pls no fall my hand oh! Ogajim hmm sorry KunleOshod cheesy cheesy cheesy
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 12:18pm On Oct 31, 2009
ttalks:
Note/Observation:

Tonye-t keeps advocating that he does not tithe according/based on the Mosaic law.
Do you have a problem with that cheesy cheesy
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 12:11pm On Oct 31, 2009
Zikkyy:
Find below my thoughts one time on this issue of New Testament tithing

Christ comment in Mathew 23:23 relates to the requirement of the Mosaic Law which was still being adhered to by the Jews at the time (perhaps with some modifications).  We all agree that an “informed” tither today does not render his/her tenths based on the Mosaic Law. That’s why I never see this as a ‘good enough’ justification to tithe.
Yes in a way, Nay in another way

How i mean:

Yes in the sense that the custom (QAL) dated way back b4 the mosaic introduction (PIEL)

Nay in the sense that the mosaic introduction showed us the blessing tied in the practise (TERUMUOT)

The two both plays a role of helping us know the subject better and brighter

do you understand, and by the way WAS TITHING REFERRED TO AS A LAW, pls answer this wink wink


Zikkyy:
I think it’s better to say one is inspired by the practice of tithing in the bible as a basis for tithing.
Now you've spoken well, yes one should be inspired based on the origin of the custom (MA' ASER) and not on the blessing attached
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 12:03pm On Oct 31, 2009
Zikkyy:
I have a question here; do we really need an intermediary between us and Christ?
I havent said there is or there should be any intermediary btw us and Christ, pls dont misquote me, rather i said Today when we give tithe, the Men of God (levites after the order of Christ) receives it with prayers and presents it to Christ (Priest after the order of melchisedek who received tithe). The statement does not sound like there was any intermediary, rather it does sound like there was someone who is assigned to have leadership over us and thus should help administer things in the Sanctuary.

well in furtherance, it all depends on where you're trying to look at it from, if i were to answer you, then i'll say in relationship we do not need any intermediary (heb.4:16), but in administeration YES we do need intermediaries (Act.4, Acts.6),Pls Zikky dont come up here and start asking me questions like 'why should we have heads or someone who should help us administer when we ourselves could do it' as that question could mean funny. because b4 you start asking it, you should atleast ask yourself what roles were the LEVITES called to do in the mosaic time, were they intermediaries or helpmates, ask yourself again.

And what roles was Peter,disciples, deacons, elders called to play was it not to help in receiving things from the people and presenting it to God?


Acts 4:35 : And laid it at the feet of the apostles (special messengers). Then distribution was made according as anyone had need. AMP

The way you guys ask questions really baffle me, or maybe the word levites, priests, and others sound too heavy to hear by you guys as you need someone to tell you that still yet in the early church some folks assumed these offices though with different names. read greek interpretations of the offices again and maybe we wont be asking such questions.

I can go on and on quoting more examples of intermediaries, but i know allwill be to no avail. come to even think of it, maybe you guys should start paying me for my lectures sef , lol cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy joking!
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 11:40am On Oct 31, 2009
Zikkyy:
The result is that a lot of Christians do not know why they tithe, and instead sees it as an investment. There is no sincerity in giving anymore. It’s possible a lot of people will stop tithing if you remove the blessing element that’s believed to be associated with tithing.
Glad you know now, that's why this thread was created
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 11:16am On Oct 31, 2009
Zikkyy:
The issue I have with tithing is not you rendering a tenth of your income to your church/MOG
Then we dont have an argument, or do we, as anything else would mean creating a new topic.
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 5:14pm On Oct 30, 2009
[size=13pt]this aint questions, but sha I'll entertain all of em' by grace of YHWH questions next week smiley[/size]
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 10:56am On Oct 30, 2009
chukwudi44:
Your stupidity is already a universaly acknowleged fact,was tithing the only part of the law that prceded moses?how come criminals like you and your pastors don't preach about burnt offerings abi because that one won't bring money into your pocket ?

in the NT,apostle Paul condemmed as heretics [people who preached compulsory circumcision as a requirement for salvation even though it actually precede moses ?I fit was a standard like you claim it was why then did paul condemn it?

the last time I checked freewill offferings (not burnt offerings ) were reiterated in the NT,but no where in the bible did I see where christians were asked to pay tithes

even if you claim to pay tithes under the order of melchizedek ,based on that order how maby btimes did Abraham pay tithes to melchizedek? was it not once and it was even from the proceeds of war.

you must be stupid to think that this crusade is going to end ,on the contrary it is only just begining,wait until nigeria aquitres it's full ICT potential. This crusade to liberate christians who has long being enslaved and deprived of their hard earned money from thr like of Mattew A$HIMOLOWOLO,CREFLO $,TONYE-T e.tc
Just a typical example of the reason why i refrain from answering people like you, Chukwudi44 my friend, why are your posts always filled with insults and abuses, they portrait sighns of immaturity you know, the best you can do is not to answer anyone rather than raining bitterness. it aint right. God bless you! smiley smiley
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 10:49am On Oct 30, 2009
KunleOshob:
I am here cheesy you must be missing me hence your attempts to label me other wise i am not really bothered if you like you can label me as that idiot called pilgrim.1 grin it won't raise an hair of my chest. As i said earlier my campaign againts the evil, greedy twisted and heretical false doctrine of tithes remains my christian obligation as the scam is bringing christianity into disrepute and some of us are still interested in protecting the integrity of the faith.

Yes, u are right Bro! but wait a second, you're beginning to act way more funnier you know cheesy cheesy, you seem to be going out of the thread. well wat ever! undecided undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 5:04pm On Oct 29, 2009
ogajim:
Tonye-t huh huh huh huh

Are you sure of what you quoted on Matt. 23:23? You must have a different Bible than the rest of us DUDE undecided undecided undecided undecided

Here is the whole Matthew 23 for everyone:

Matthew 23

1Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples,

2Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:

3All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.

~~

We need to stop twisting the Scriptures to suite our individual purpose, greed, or whatever. Giving is without a doubt IMPORTANT in our Christian WALK but it is not all that we need to make Heaven, giving comes in all forms BTW.
KunleOshod my dearest friend, i do not understand what you mean by misquoting yourself, believe me, where did i quote Matt.23:9, i cant seem to understand again, believe me. cheesy cheesy cheesy

ogajim:
Tonye-t,

I know you started this thread but as you can see, it's 4th and LONG and maybe it's time you PUNT like any sane man would do.

Thank you and God bless you.
KunleOshod is begging, i thought you said 'no retreat no surrender' to your claims, then go ahead na
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 4:58pm On Oct 29, 2009
I wish we both discuss this thing at length save for time and my duty calls, just the two of us for now, ok? pardon my lengthy posts pls

Zikkyy:
Its one thing to read, its anothing to understand/inteprete, especially when there is an agenda to be achieved. Smething for Churches/MOGs that abuse tithing. Thats why some people need to be educated.
- Zikkyy they aint no agenda to achieve but that of simply knowing the truth about something, one of the most gr8test lessons ever taught me by my dad is 'not to blindly follow a crowd, but be withdrawn in prudency to study a thing because thats the place of distinction and honor'. From origin, i asked myself 2questions about this thing called 'tithe' and the questions were

1. What really is titheing?  2. Why do people tithe?

I go to church and see believers raise some funny envelopes especially when announcements for titheing is made , and then they give, now what really amazed me was that amongst the tithers were some that were blessed more and some were declining seriously unto poverty, then i asked: 'if tithing was such a big thing that gives prosperity then why doesnt mr.A gets blessed as does Mr.b. could there be a problem no addressed or could this thing called titheing be such a scam?

Then i began tithing without having any knowledge wahtsoever about tithing, as all i know was that "when i tithe, God will open the gates of heaven and shower his blessings on me", believe me i started prospering and making success as i wrote in my intro-comment. But one thing was missing in me and that meant that i could easily deviate just as i was introduced simply because i lack any knowledge about what i was practising.

Some few years later, sometime early this year i stopped tithing because i went online and saw materials that seriously spoke ill about this practise and then i stopped tithing obviously based on the reasons i saw from articles and writers. Zikkyy my friend within a space of 6mths i suffered lack, when i say lack i literally begged for N10 to buy myself a digestive biscuit to eat for a whole day, i earn very well but then i just couldnt explain how my salary gets exhausted within a week, is it sickness, misfortunes,wear-n-tear,dejection, victim of theft to mention but a few, i suffered many other things i wont want to come up here and start saying in the open. yes i know this lack and suffering i had could be experienced by all even of those who tithe, while again some few who do not tithe could still be blessed too. But then we both know that when we give offering God tells us he will bless us, isn’t it? But then how come Cain and Abel both offered, and Abels own was accepted and Cains rejected, this could mean that believers could tithe and still suffer penury because of how they gave to God.

1 Tim 1:13-14

>>13 . . .  I [they] obtain mercy because I[they] had acted[act] out of ignorance
>>Acts.17:30 - "In the day of ignorance God will overlook. . ."
but then its one thing to do a thing in ignorance and another with full knowledge as the latter could mean rebellion, look at what the scriptures say here

>>Romans.2:1 - "Thou art inexcusable, O man. . .
thus i suffered more because i had no excuse as the nominal christians do, and around July i was watching a program on TBN with Gregory Dickow, he is my mentor, and he was teaching about tithes and its relevance and advised christians to do a thorough study about things lest they misbehave and abuse alot of spiritual things (which is the brain child behind this thread) and he began opening my eyes to alot of things many MOGs doesnt know and as such can not preach as all they tend to know and preach about tithes were strictly from Malachi, i dont blame them sha i see alot of our Nigeria MOGs as greedy folks that have abused this practise and made us look like idiots b4 the WORLD

After his teaching i resorted to taking my time to gather materials, I even bought Greek and Hebrew versions of the bible to back my study, and with this materials i have been writing all thru' this thread

[li] MY UNDESTANDING OF TITHE[/li]



TITHE

(tith) (ma`aser; dekate): The custom of giving a 10 th part of the products of the land and of the spoils of war to priests and kings (1 Macc 10:31; 11:35; 1 Sam 8:15,17) was a very ancient one among most nations. That the Jews had this custom long before the institution of the Mosaic Law is shown by Gen 14:17-20 (cf. Heb 7:4) and Gen 28:22.
A better rendering for the original word "ma`aser" means a standard of parting one's possession into 10 places and given 1/10th to a superior person and this act is called ~~~~~ . Some ancient writings say it could also mean an act of worship to a diety as appreciation, a solicitation, an enquiry, an appeasement. Babylonians practised it, the ancient moab tribes and other ancient tribes did too. A lot of this tribes if not all tribes still hold this practice till date. Even the romans did it too, and also introduced it into their economic and administrative systems as what we call TAX today, ask me and I’ll say it was not borrowed from the bible but rather from their ancestors. Do you understand?

Some scholars even argue that the offerings given by Abel was a tithe of his livestock if you compare what he offered and what God commanded the Israelites in Num.18. well let me don’t go there lest KunleOshod and my anti-tithing friends come up crying foul at me again. I am only writing this here as I see you as one matured folk I have esteemed you since your first writing here on this thread).

[li] ABRAHAMIC TITHE[/li]

there are 3 kinds of tithes, we have the QAL, PIEL, HIPHIL

Qal’ (Give a tenth portion) refer to the original act of titheing which was given by the head patriach (Abraham) of whose descendant the Christ will come, which is to give a tenth of one’s spoils and booties, and mind you this spoils and booties could mean gold, silver, garments, diamonds, livestocks , crops and other farm produces and all that one could possess that one possesses (Your first son or first child inclusive).Even Abraham could be said to have tithed 2wice, that of Melchisedek and that of giving up Isaac. Hope you now see why I laugh at Chukwudi and KunleOshod and their likes each time they argue here with questions like WHY SHOULD TITHING BE IN MONEY. In ancient days what do they use in trading if not gold, silver, cowries as is what some villages and rurals still use in trading, and making their coins for commerce.

Yes we do not have any biblical account of anyone tithing again aside the promised tithe by Jacob, but scriptural intuition will tell you that this act continued through the descendants of Abraham – Isaac – Jacob and beyond.Else ask yourself if Jacob was not taught tithing then how did he know about the practice such that he even made a promise of it. My believe in the biblios is that not all things were over-emphasized because a word is enough for a wise person, else if all were then

>>John 21:25- . . . I suppose that even the world itself could not contain (have room for) the books that would be written. AMP
The Biblios (i.e. the bible) is a document that contains facts/ figures about life’s experience regarding a context(s) quote me anywhere.

[li]MELCHISEDEK AND JESUS CHRIST[/li]



This is one place i hold a strong argument backing tithe and its relevance. I have explained it here before but the antis pretended they did not see this part

If you take the time to read thru’ the bible you’ll see that God’s relationship with man followed a pattern and this pattern has standards that both parties must follow for a true relationship

What were this patterns?:

1.   There must be a Person who mediates btw God and Man (read.Heb.7:17-20)Enoch played this role but Mechisedek was the first to assume this office of which Samuel, Nathan,and awhole lot of others,  Job too did the same (Job.1:5), thereafter Abraham (Gen.18:20-33),Abraham’s lineage and then to Jacob’s and later to Moses and the trail followed until Jesus’s time

2.   Now carefully take the time to study what each of this persons/priest/princes did, One was that they gave offerings as a means of worship/relationship and they offered sacrifices which were meant to make atonement for sins, two they taught the people how to relate with God and Man, which if you agree with me a little account of their acts was given of some of these few men who assumed the office of the priest.

3.   Now One practice the bible noted that some of these princes/priests did was the act of paying tithe, take for example Melchisedek received tithe, Abraham gave tithe, Jacob promised tithe, Nehemiah ordered tithe, Moses instituted Tithe, Jesus rebuked hypocrites of wrong titheing but approved it in his comment “the later you are suppose  to keep not despising the former(tithe)- Matt.23:23”

4.   Now the question is this? What is the relevance of titheing since I said it remains a practice that should still be relevant in the scriptures one may ask, Titheing is as significant as Offering is but the chasm is that the later was given freely while the former has followed an standard (a specific amount), now that’s what I meant by standard.

Now Melshicedek received tithe, and Bible said Jesus was made a priest after the order of melchisedek, have you really ask yourself this, that if Jesus Christ was a priest after Melchisedek and melchisedek received tithe, then what was expected of Jesus Christ



Malkiy-Tsedeq
OT:4442 Malkiy-Tsedeq —Melchizedek = "my king is Sedek"
king of Salem and priest of the Most High God to whom Abram paid tithe after the battle he fought to free Lot; `the order of Melchizedek ' the order of the priesthood to which Christ belongs
This order could be compared as Aaron and the levites relationship as melchisedek and Christ)-Heb.7:16, Aaron received it under the law; likewise the levites took it from the people and gave it to the High priest whom Aaron fell into.
Today when we give tithe, the Men of God (levites after the order of Christ) receives it with prayers and presents it to Jesus Christ (Priest after the order of melchisedek who received tithe) Read Hebrews.6, 7,8 again,

Someone said that when the bible said Christ was a priest after the ORDER of Melchisedek it meant that he was like Melchisedek, I accept this , but only for the sake that we are yet to see the meaning of the word ORDER as used in that passage. Take a look at this, the term order means taxis in Hebrew meaning to follow/be drawn after a succession

1. taxis "an arranging, arrangement, order" (akin to tasso, "to arrange, draw up in order"wink, is used in Luke 1:8 of the fixed succession of the course of the priests; of due "order," in contrast to confusion, in the gatherings of a local church, 1 Cor 14:40; of the general condition of such, Col 2:5 (some give it a military significance here); of the divinely appointed character or nature of a priesthood, of Melchizedek, as foreshadowing that of Christ, Heb 5:6,10; 6:20; 7:11 (where also the character of the Aaronic priesthood is set in contrast); 7:17 (in some mss, v. 21).
But what a lot of folks seem to understand of that word ORDER is different as what that passage used it for, this is what others understand of that word

epidiorthoo NT:1930, "to set in order" (epi "upon," dia, "through, intensive," and orthos, "straight"wink, is used in Titus 1:5, in the sense of setting right again what was defective, a commission to Titus, not to add to what the apostle himself had done, but to restore what had fallen into disorder since the apostle had labored in Crete; this is suggested by the epi.
A priest after the order of Melchisedec

A priest after the order of Melchisedec: -- Two orders of priesthood are referred to in the Scriptures-that of Melchisedec and that of Aaron. Certain functions were common to both, such as sacrifice, intercession, and blessing. The text implies peculiarities in the order of Melchisedec, and that it was in some respects superior to that of Aaron. These were --

1. That it was a royal order. Melchisedec was berth king and priest, which was never the case in the Mosaic economy. He was arrayed with double honour -- a king of righteoustness and a priest of the Most High God; He received tribute from Abraham, and conferred his blessing upon him. In these respects he typified Christ, who was the Head of His Church, and thus their King; while He was also Saviour of the Church, which is His body, and so their Priest.

2. Its universality. The Levitical order was national and limited in its scope, and its honours and privileges were for the Jew alone. In Melchisedec's day there were no Jews. No nation bad yet been chosen as the peculiar people of God. Humanity was one, and Melchisedec was a priest of humanity. The shadow of his mitre extended as far as the shadow of his crown, and the incense of his intercession covered all that his sceptre swayed. Christ was a Priest of this higher order. He never once called Himself the Son of Judah, but on sixty-three occasions the Son of Man. The intercession of the high priest was bruited to those for whom he offered sacrifice, arid no sacrifice was offered for Gentiles on the Great Day of Atonement. The extent of Christ's intercession was evidenced by three little words. All, every, the whole. "Christ died for all." "He tasted death for every man"; "for the sins of the whole world."

3. It was intransissible. Melchisedec's priesthood began and ended with himself, and thus differed from the Levitical, which was strictly dependent on an unbroken pedigree, on both father's and mother's side. Melchisedec was selected as one specially qualified for the office. The Levitical priests were officially, but not always personally, holy. Christ, too, fulfilled this requirement.

4. It was a perpetual priesthood. Under the Levitical law the priest could hold his office only between the ages of thirty and fifty. In Melchisedec's day no such law obtained. The Levitical priest died out of his office, Christ in the exercise of His office. In the grave of Joseph He was still a Priest. That was His robing-room, where He was preparing for His everlasting work of intercession, putting off mortality that He might put on immortality. The golden bells on the hem of the high priest's robe rang when he sprinkled the blood of the covenant upon and below the mercy-seat, and thus conveyed the assurance to the silent multitude without that their priest still lived, and that their sacrifice was accepted. These golden bells were paralleled by the declarations of the Word of God, such as "He is consecrated a Priest for evermore"; "I am He that liveth and was dead," &c. Then there was the great bell of God's oath, "The Lord hath sworn and will not repent; Thou art a Priest for ever," &c.

Jesus Christ was said to be a PRIEST AFTER THE ‘TAXIS’ OF MELCHISEDEK could be likened to what Jesus had with his disciples, what He did was what his disciples did too, what melchisedek did was what Jesus Christ must do too, amongst this was that Melchisedek took a tithe, therefore what do you think is expected of Christ, pls my dear friend answer this question in sincerity and unbiased!
[li] MOSAIC TITHE[/li]


This act was Piel, meaning an instruction given to be followed, hmmm I gat to go now.  I will continue tomorrow my dear friend, bye and God bless you

But pls read below what I wrote about giving it could help us out you know!

Giving have been divided into three kinds:

1. Impletratoria, denoting those which are designed to procure some favor or benefit, which is where the HIPHIL falls in,meaning an act to provoke anther act as was shown in Mal.3

2. Eucharistica, those which are expressive of gratitude for bounties or mercies received; this is where the Abraham tithing fall (which in hebrew means QAL - giving out of gratitude)

3. Piacularia, those which are meant to atone for sins and propitiate the Deity, this is where we have the SIN offering, BURNT offering, HEAVE offering all fall under also called PIEL, this is usually in form of an instruction, as was also the TITHES instructed by the Israelites
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 11:04am On Oct 29, 2009
adefash:
The topic says"Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental?"
I FASH stand to tell you categorically that TITHING is not a new testament practice.go thru this linkhttp://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-307798.0.html and i hope you will be convinced and not to be confused that tithing is not new testament.ok?

Bro, i have gone thru' that URL and there aint nothing new from what anti-tithers argue with as a case, another dumb link you've got there wink wink wink
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 11:00am On Oct 29, 2009
chukwudi44:
@tonye-t

when christ made that statement in matt 23 ,was the law not still in force then ?,Jesus lived under the dispensation of the law,it was only abolished by his death,that's why the likes of st Paul had to fend for himself by building tents rather than twisting the scripture like today's modern pastors
gooosh, i cant help it but say that your posts are always so daft! can you give me a wider explanation to your claim, was tithing a law, why should a non-law practise abolish with the law, so do you wish to tell me that offerings abolished too, afterall it existed b4 the law and it existed in the law.

When will peeps know the difference btw the law and a standard!

hmmmmm, chukwudi44, pls read your bible and not a pamflet issued during masses, ok  wink wink
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 10:52am On Oct 29, 2009
ttalks:
I have been alright and still am. wink

I'm not going to argue that Matthew 23:23 with u cos I know I wouldn't make any headway;we've been through that before.

Instead, I'd rather you and viaro thrash out the differences in your opinion as regards whether it is compulsory for Christians or not(since u guys favor tithing howbeit differently).

I know viaro has tried to do that earlier with u but that got lost in the midst of other banter on the topic.
1. Were have we been thru' that before, i ask you?

2. since you are dragging me and viaro together, then dat means you prolly have nothing to offer tongue henceforth you should mop grin ok?

3. Did you say viaro did * with me?  undecided undecided

Brother, i have explained alot here and still willing to explain even though peeps like you wont listen,does it matter? wat i believe is right is what i do

cheers!  wink wink
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 5:23pm On Oct 28, 2009
ttalks:
Observation/Note:

For Viaro, tithing is not compulsory but voluntary.

For the OP; Tonye-t, tithing is compulsory since he believes it is an injunction on Christians.

Conclusion: The argument/fight is against the latter's position and not the former's.

grin
And i am still standing on the fact of Matt.23:23,

[size=14pt]"you should show mercy yes, you should be faithful yes, you should show fairness yes, and should you tithe also yes" (Hebrew- english paraphrased version)[/size]

now those this verse seem/look like a voluntary statement i ask? never-say-die-brethrens like ttalks, zzikky, kunleOshod wat else do you want me to say, go back and study tithes better for yourself, not from anti-tithers but neutral and wise minded folks.

God bless you!angry angry grin grin

Nice to have you back, aw u dey na?  cheesy cheesy
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 5:16pm On Oct 28, 2009
Zikkyy:
I am cool. Been busy. Was hoping this war ooops sorry grin i mean discussion will extend to next week so i can be part of it (less busy then).

Well, i can say attempts to stop some tithers from rendering his/her tenths could have some health/psychogical implications. In the course of discussing tithing with some tithers, the look on some faces make me wish i never tried explaning/educating him/her about tithe. I think the war/protest at the abuses of tithing should be directed at the churches/MOGs. Encouraging people to read the bible (and not just the verses quoted by the MOG while in church) is not a bad idea as well. A tither wishing to tithe after obtaining a clear understanding of tithe can better defend his/her position (which is usually what i want to see and not the MOG's quotes). Its sad a good number of our people are either illiterates or just not prepared to reason things for themselves and therefore vulnerable to manipulation.

People like Tonye-t should always prepare to be attacked if they keep coming up with "funny" theories on tithing.
You see why i say you seem confused from the origin, where have i said we should tithe based on what our MOGs teach us, go back to the very first post and read my intro comment again, i said there that i used to simply base my believes on what they(MOGs ) say but after all and sundry i resorted to studying this issue myself. read almost all my posts here and you'l find out that its either i refer to greek, hebrew/aramaic teachings of the topic and most importanly that of the biblios, and not what Oyedepo, or chris, or adeboye or kumuyi teaches. lest i forget noce to have you back bro, i specially kept some questions for you while you're gone wink wink cheesy cheesy
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 5:53pm On Oct 26, 2009
rabzy:
I say Tithing is not new testamental.
Who says? show me where it was stated in the bible

rabzy:
more so it has been serially abused by dubious pastors
Ok so is that the reason why you say it is not relevant?

rabzy:
but going strictly by the scriptures, tithing is not part of christian obligation.
what scriptures Sir?
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 5:48pm On Oct 26, 2009
Hello Mr.KunleOshod(insultive-guy)

am still waiting for your answer to my queestion tongue tongue tongue
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 4:59pm On Oct 26, 2009
@Kunleoshod,

do you give offerings, if yes , with what? and pls show me scriptures that says you should give in that mode, and also lest i forget am glad you didnt deny the claim winky winky wink wink wink
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 4:31pm On Oct 26, 2009
Why am i force to think that we have another KunleOshod[size=13pt]2[/size] hiding behind the screen of a finger wink wink believe me i aint no fool wink wink
Christianity EtcRe: Welcome "shakerz": The Most Incisive Muslim On Nairaland. by Tonyet1(m): 4:26pm On Oct 26, 2009
For once i will accept Tudors 1st comment that this thread is all the more another baseless thread, with everyother creaving to make his religion look all the more appealing than the other

@ Shakerz posts,

Respect to you brother, but i stand to say some few lines of yours i disagree as i can bet you that our small brains,minds and hearts can never phantom God, knowledge of God spans beyond philosophies, spans beyond freethinking, and above all logics. The ancients dreaded HIM so much so that no one felt it worthy to mention the name, rather they related it to another with an inscription that looks like 'YHWH' when written on tabularisers/ bookmarks/ caves/ slates, until scholars came in to add vowel to give a pronounciation hence the name YAHWEH, after the translation of aramaics to hebrew, it became JEHOVAH, God is just a tag for expressing the personality of the SUPREME DIETY. do you understand?

I pray i can have enough time to explain some few things here

[li] ADAMIC VIEW OF YHWH ATTRIBUTES [/li]

- In Genesis it was explained that '. . .the lord made them male and female', '. . the lord came in the cool of the day. . ." this texts and others in the early genesis of the ancient scrolls in the original hebrew script referred to YWHW as DUNAMUUS, meaning the indwelling of a force in human called the YWHW consciousness" with this it became evident by those of old that YWHW is first of all EEL INVINCIBLE (meaning a spirit)

- Not too long Man fell, and when EEL INVINCIBLE visited Sin has shown up, with that we saw how YWHW passed a judgement on ET ELOOHYIIM (Meaning a lower god after the order of YHWH ELOOHYIIM, which is where Adam and all Mankind fall under), now after this judgement, some scribes argue that it was here YHWH showed himself as a PUNISHER of EVIL, so anyone saying God in the OT is different from the NT on the subject of heaven and hell is wrong, becos HE showed his very nature also from the ORIGIN OF BOOKS (genesis)

- Later again still yet in the early Genesis , you'll recall that a time came when Cain and Abel offered unto YHWH, and one's sacrifice was preferred to the other, God was seen here as YWHW of SACRIFICE

i feel like going on and on but for time,now the crux of my argument to all em' muslims, buddism and so more, if you go back to study the very root of your religions, you'll all agree that Mankind fell yes you're right, again you'll all agree that sin spread to all yes you're right, you'll also say that offering and sacrifices are made to atone for sins, but where you all fail to see it is that how potent has this sacrifice and offerings to clean the vry sinful nature of mankind.

This is where the finale of all GOD-CREAVING comes in play in the overview,

1. ELOOHYIIM (God) created ET ELOOHYIIM (Adam/ Man), spirit made a spirit and put it in a vessel

2. ELOOHYIIM gave instructions, yet Man disobeyed

3. Man fell and lost the full potents of his very nature (bible said 'for the day you eat of this you shall die' meaning the spiritual nature of Man lost its source)

4. Heaven is God's throne, Earth is Man's abode

5. Spirits dwell in heaven with Celestial bodies (book of corinthians), while spirits dwell on earth with terrestial bodies.

6. Man fell still yet in his terrestial body, therefore a saviour( whether from the celestial or otherwise) must come in this terrestial body (flesh) to lead this fallen mankind

7. All attributes of this saviour must meet the very nature of the two kindreds, hence the sayings about Jesus as A CARPENTER YET A KING (very opposite yet true if you understand this overview)

8. This Saviour must compromise his very flesh to show unto others a standard, bible says something like . . "been sown in corruption(flesh) and raised in incorruption (the rebirth of the original 'el elooyhiim') "

9. Mind you if you think God will not punish man in hell, you're wrong, recall if he could destroy sodom and gomorrah (JUDAISM), if he could destroy the world in Noah's time(JUDAISM), if he could destroy those who mormored against Moses (JUDAISM) will HIS VERY NATURE CHANGE

>>For i am the Lord that changeth not

>>He is the same yesterday, today and forever
Christianity EtcRe: Why Did God Put The Tree Of Knowledge In The Garden Of Eden by Tonyet1(m): 1:01pm On Oct 26, 2009
Also to add,

TLB bible version puts it this way


>>>Gen 2:9: The Lord God planted all sorts of beautiful trees there in the garden, trees producing the choicest of fruit. At the center of the garden he placed the Tree of Life, and also the Tree of Conscience, giving knowledge of Good and Bad.
TLB


I personally believe amongst those trees were SPIRITUAL ones and PHYSICAL ones, and not all physical as some may think, Adam and Eve could be likened as Little babies who have the seed of conscience in them from birth but should use it when they are matured, which was what God had in mind, but not what happened
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 11:45am On Oct 26, 2009
KunleOshod, Ogajim and all anti-tithers,

I feel lightened to write, thus i will as the spirit of God gives me unction,

@Ogajim,

I chose to address you first becos you seem to be offensive,which is my turn on, if i can guess right, then i think your major arguments are simply as a result of you not understanding the scriptures at least to a point of explainng it to another.

Let me TEACH you some things here:

1st: - Do you realize that the BIBLE in the original greek ('biblios') means a document that summates basic and importants facts/history yet not all. (check the dictionary or better still quote me anywhere)

The Holy Bible is a document that summates basic and important facts yet not all happenings (quote me anywhere,or better still refer to John 21:25) as it appears your arguments always come from the fact that becos Jesus never emphasized a thing twice simply meant it aint important, or becos he spake it to the pharisees meant it doesnt apply to us as someone put it.

Now i ask you, pls Ogajim and probably your co's, pls show me where Jesus christ or anyother disciples outrightly emphasized OFFERINGS, and i said OFFERING and not GIVING, would you need a daft to explain that that GIVING would mean BOTH OFFERINGS AND TITHINGS, yet you dont get it!

when we give alms doesnt it fall under GIVING?

when we give offerings doesnt it fall under GIVING?

so why would a tenth of your possession bcome such a big ripple?

I feel compulsed to explain GIVING here

GIVING

The general name for which in Hebrew is <START HEBREW>/b*r=q*<END HEBREW>, korban', although several other words are so rendered) is anything presented to God as a means of conciliating his favor(check or refer to a hebrew dictionary); which being in the Jewish, as well as in all other religions, considered as the one thing needful, has always constituted an essential part of public worship and private piety. In the treatment of this topic I’ll bring together. the ancient information with whatever light modern research has thrown upon it.\

Giving have been divided into three kinds:

1. Impletratoria, denoting those which are designed to procure some favor or benefit, which is where the HIPHIL falls in,meaning an act to provoke anther act as was shown in Mal.3

2. Eucharistica, those which are expressive of gratitude for bounties or mercies received; this is where the Abraham tithing fall (which in hebrew means QAL - giving out of gratitude)

3. Piacularia, those which are meant to atone for sins and propitiate the Deity, this is where we have the SIN offering, BURNT offering, HEAVE offering all fall under also called PIEL, this is usually in form of an instruction, as was also the TITHES instructed by the Israelites

Pls b4 you start arguing on who tithed and who never tithed, was it aborted or still relevant,it will be wise to understand where all givings fall under

Thanks for now, lest i forget Viaro, you are doing a great job
Christianity EtcRe: Any Mormons In The House? by Tonyet1(m): 1:37pm On Oct 23, 2009
@ poster,

I was also told the church has its won bible called BOOK OF MORMONS , is it true?
Christianity EtcRe: Can God Really Save? by Tonyet1(m): 1:35pm On Oct 23, 2009
jagunlabi:
That is the whole idea,is it not?The youths must learn to trust in themselves to make a positive change in the realities that they are experiencing.The reason why things are upside down is that they have no belief in themselves to make these changes and they spend too much time on praying to and place too much trust on an entity up in the sky to come down and do everything for them,which is nothing but a grand delusion.And,yes, the older generations are also very guilty of this.
As the saying goes,"Teach a man how to fish and he will feed well,but give a man religion and he will die of hunger praying for a fish."
Brother you're slightly wrong on that, the trouble and problem we face in the world were all birthed by folks who think they can do it, when the bible tells us to do the opposite, let me show you

>>>Proverbs 3:5 - [size=15pt]Trust in the LORD with all thine heart[/size]; [size=13pt]and lean not unto thine own understanding.[/size]

@Poster,

Answer is yes!God can save but only those who believe He(God) can save them!
Christianity EtcRe: What Does It Mean To Speak In Tongues by Tonyet1(m): 1:23pm On Oct 23, 2009


Chuwkudi44 my friend, you'll have to experience it b4 you understand it, believe me!
Christianity EtcRe: New Age Teachings Of Pastor Chris Oyakhilome. Is It Right? by Tonyet1(m): 1:20pm On Oct 23, 2009
@Poster,

Since you've seen straight explanations from someone here to answer the topic, wont it be rather nice you call the thread quit? undecided undecided or you want to turn it into another classroom session of slimings and baseless arguments?
PoliticsRe: Yar'adua's Health Worsens, Collapses At Hilton Hotel by Tonyet1(m): 1:30pm On Oct 22, 2009
Even though i dont really have anything against Umaru, but i still think that

[li] For one to provide a sound Administration, it requires that such a person should be sound in all totality both mentally, intellectuallyand of most importance, such a person should be sound PHYSICALLY[/li]

[li] Where Umaru would have functioned well was if he had met a good nigeria, not a bad one like we have presently, that would require a lot of strength, vigor and power to manage[/li]



[li] Nigeria is about the largest black nation of [U] THE WORLD [/u], we aint like togo nor zaire nor gabon with gross popu. of <10million were even a 14yrs old boy given power and authority can lead, we are >180million for christ sake, [u]sad it is to know that THE LEADER OF THIS ACCLAIMED LARGEST BLACK NATION OF THE WORLD IS A SICK MAN[/U] [/LI]


In my opinion, Umaru came at the wrong time to a wrong place thru' a wrong means as a wrong person, well May God help Nigeria!
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 10:55am On Oct 20, 2009
@ Ogajim and KunleOshod,

i pormise to reply you guys when i m free for my break today

stay blessed!
Christianity EtcRe: Who Says Tithing Is Not New Testamental? by Tonyet1(op): 10:53am On Oct 20, 2009
Maybe i should start becoming all the more cautious with my posts lest they assume that

TONYE-T = VIARO = BOBBYAF = GENTLEME = all pro-tithers

One person said
Tonye-t = Viaro grin

another said
Viaro = Pilgrim 1 grin

another said
Tonye-t = Ludacrious grin

while yet another
Tonye-t = Gentle Me grin when these are peeps i barely even know anything about, the best is to check our post or a good moderator should check from the background

Pharisees said
Jesus Christ = Belizebulb

One day they will say that
Tonye-t = seun cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy



May God help me!  smiley smiley smiley
Christianity EtcRe: Are all men born equal? by Tonyet1(op): 10:44am On Oct 20, 2009
Yeah Ttalks good morning,

your observations were truly right, i wasnt really myself yesterday, cocky i guess, i cant seem to tell what sprolled in me, i was going thru' my post i made to Jesoul (my sister), KunleOshod(my stubborn brother), Kellorah and Ogajim (my new friends) and they got me laffing , i prolly must have burst some balls yesterday. pls i sincerely apologize to everyone smiley smiley shit happens, we aint perfect!.

i will provide proofs to this claim of the TOPIC when i m free today hopefully!

Stay blessed!
Christianity EtcRe: Did Jesus Teach That Good Unbelievers Can Go To Heaven? by Tonyet1(m): 6:13pm On Oct 19, 2009
@ Jesoul,

Are all dis false accusations and insults really necessary?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 (of 77 pages)