Truthislight's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Truthislight's Profile › Truthislight's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 (of 222 pages)
[quote author=Mr_Anony]It is good that we are working towards the same thing. What we are divided on is what it means to "perish" as shown in scripture. Unfortunately the other verses prove no such thing. They talk about a destruction yes and the wicked being cut-off yes but what is clear also and very vivid is the depiction of conscious suffering for the wicked. You can't just airbrush that part out. As I said to frosbel, I don't necessarily hold that the story is literal. All I am pointing you to is the message of the story. Remember, a parable is an analogy. The aim is to use a simple story to illustrate a greater truth. The real questions here are: What is the message of that story? Why would Jesus go through the trouble of describing the sinner experiencing pain if in reality, the sinner will merely cease to exist? Why would Jesus use a false condition to illustrate a greater truth? These are the questions we must consider[/quote]fire means everlasting death. Jesus knew the meaning of fire as he had used it earlier when he told the religiouse leaders that they cannot escape the "judgement of Gehena" Gehena = fire outside the walls of Jerusalem.. But those pharisees where not physically thrown into that fire outside Jeruselam's walls, because they killed Jesus and were later given respectful burial, does that means that Jesus statement was false? No. Jesus knew that his used of fire in their instance means that they are due for everlasting death, death without resurrection. Jesus as the judge of the judgement day has the right to pronounce judgement opon them acts 17:31. His sentence with the used of the word "fire" shows that theirs is everlasting death. Not applying fire in way that Jesus used it creat a very big problem and lead people astray. |
frosbel: You totally miss the whole point of the death of Christ, he came to save us from SIN and it's consequence which is DEATH not eternal torment.this is beautifully stated. frosbel: You totally miss the whole point of the death of Christ, he came to save us from SIN and it's consequence which is DEATH not eternal torment.and that ^^^ is true. |
[quote author=Mr_Anony]As I keep reminding you, I have never said that the parable is literal. My point is that names or no names doesn't make the narrative any more or less literal. You seem very happy to argue over not-so-relevant details of the story, the more important question which you seem very eager to avoid is: What is the message of the story? Why would Jesus use a false condition to Illustrate a truth?[/quote]jesus did not used any false conditions at all. He knew what fire signifies = everlasting death. Meaning everlasting separation from God the source of life. He was not talking about temporary Adamic death but death without resurrection and fire is the right symbol for it. |
italo: So since you admit that Christians have been living Christian lives even before the NT was written, it means that one can live a good Christian life without the Bible. Yes or No?there was no NT then, as such they the apostles were the authorities and it is this apostles that wrote the books called the NT The NT writings are leters to christian congregations on how to conduct the church and the beliefs of the church thereof. With this instructions the church is to operate. This are the instructions of the apostles to christians and i stand by that. |
[quote author=Lord_Reed]On what basis are you making that change? Where is the evidence? Here you go:[/quote]by this your statement there was no need for christ to be resurrected by God since he was already alive. I thought he went to the spirit in prison after his resurection like He went with satan during his temptations |
ijawkid: You and your twin bro are doing exactly that...I just showed ihedinobi a replica of the scripture he quoted to support his stance to help him see the real meanings of bible truths..but you guys turned a blind eye to it...bros, you are welcome. |
frosbel: We are all busy mate, there is a word called multitasking , no ?this reply to Anony got 5 likes up there, let me go back and make it 6 likes. |
[quote author=Lord_Reed]One thing is clear from scriptures that men are conscious after they die. There is a holding place for the dead or Jesus would not have said "Today...". O c'mon don't nitpick. Are you going to say you need scripture before I can say God is intelligent? This a universally held attribute that barely needs introduction into any topic. We would not even be having this discussion if we didn't accept it without reservation.[/quote]How can it be? Lets see. [quote author=Lord_Reed]One thing is clear from scriptures that men are conscious after they die.[/quote]^^^Thats a lie that actually supports satan's stance man will not die. What story did the dead lazarus had to say on his resurrection? None which he will have done had he been to heaven being Jesus friend as it were. Why will Jesus have to bring him back from a glorious heavenly place? Can you cite a scripture to support this your stance? [quote author=Lord_Reed]There is a holding place for the dead or Jesus would not have said "Today...".[/quote]error, you got it wrong. Today means that the criminal should note that date, that he Jesus has promise him that he will be with him in paradise as in note "today" the 23 of oct 2012, i am promising you, you will be with me in paradise. How can he be with Jesus in paradise that same "day" when Jesus went back to heaven 40 days later? How can he be with jesus in paradise when Jesus had promise his disciple that he will go and prepare a place for them first. How can he be with Jesus in paradise that same day When Jesus was in the grave for three(3) days after then? *sigh* you better start dong real bible study. [quote author=Lord_Reed]O c'mon don't nitpick. Are you going to say you need scripture before I can say God is intelligent? This a universally held attribute that barely needs introduction into any topic. We would not even be having this discussion if we didn't accept it without reservation.[/quote]yes you are right, you have the knowledge that satan has been spreading befor God chose Israel and started teaching them and gave them the true knowledge. Satan's knowledge, that is the knowledge that is available all over the place. if you need the knowledge that is Truth you have to read God's word the bible well and trough away all others. That is why you said the thief was with Jesus that same day |
DP |
cyrexx:there is no discrimination in christianity, how can that be when you show this much interest? Are you the only atheist on NL? Where are the rest if they are like you? God is the judge of the heart of man, what can man do to you? Nothing. |
[quote author=Paris_Love]I really don't have a stance whether hell here is symbolic or literal. Of course as a sinner that i am, I'd love to think hell is symbolic or does not exist. But, does the bible really support this view? For does who think hell fire here means grave, death or something should please explain this verse Mark:9:47 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God withone eye, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire: 48 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.[/quote]of what use is the hand if you dont have to use it? Jesus is figurative saying that you should deprived yourself the use of the eyes by not looking at that which will make you ofFend God and merit his eternal destruction as symbolise by fire, everlasting death (note, Jesus can not use the word death since all man will eventually die the Adamic death, but this death is a death with God's rejection due to the use of the eyes for something displeasing to God) so, he is saying instead of the use of the eyes, "cut" it off by turning your eyes away. Fire is a symbol of complete destruction. Eg, tearing paper and burning paper (burning = absolute destruction) Samething with the use of the hands. Peace |
[quote author=Mr_Anony]Hmmm, I had a busy day yesterday and thankfully this thread hasn't degenerated yet and we have been able to keep the insults and sectarianism to a minimum. I might not be able to post much today cause I've got a mountain of stuff to take care of (I might just be able to sneak in this post this morning before running off). I'll give this as sort of a summary answer to objections raised so far. It breaks my heart to have brothers who look the scripture in the eye and deny it. Thankfully, we have gotten rid of the emotional argument of a loving cuddly teddybear kind of God who won't hurt a fly. One thing with scripture is that scripture is one. It is either all of it makes sense or none of it does. The validity of a post is not based on how many verses the poster was able to spit out but on whether the post is in alignment with what the scripture is saying. It is bad practice to argue based on "I have 3 verses while you have 2 therefore I win" That is an insult to scripture. Scripture must be as a whole. When we argue about hell and we raise the parable of the rich man and lazarus, and also the parables Jesus always ends with the sinner being thrown into the outer darkness where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Some of us immediately write it off as if it being a parable somehow makes it less true. What is even more surprising is that these same people quote a psalm (a song) or a proverb (which can also be called a parable) in order to make their points. As if a psalm and proverb are somehow more literal. When we talk about the book of Revelations or souls and spirits of men, they say oh it is a "vision" only to quote a prophecy (which is also a vision). Please I beg us all, let us stop insulting the Word of God like this. If a verse of scripture seems to conflict with another verse, The aim should be reconciling them so as to understand them. Instead of discrediting their value and trying to make one verse "more correct" than another. Another tactic which I find equally puzzling is when they ask "what is the rich man's name?", "where are adam and eve","did fire burn Jesus", "who will torment the devil" (even when the bible clearly says that he will be tormented forever)etc. As if these irrelevant questions somehow mean anything or make a narrative any less valid. If we read something from the bible, we must learn to submit to it and accept it as true even if we don't like it. A quote I particularly like is one from Lord Reed. I believe he put it best. And I noticed everyone seemed to avoid the question he asked there. I'll ask the same question to all of us. [size=13pt] Even if it is "just a parable", Why would Jesus use false conditions to illustrate a truth?[/size] This is a question we must ask ourselves instead of merely writing it off because it is a "parable". The thing is that if you try hard enough, you can escape from the truth. The real question is: At what price? I urge us all, let us seek the truth instead of trying to escape from it. The aim of this discussion is not to break into camps and "try to win" but to find out the truth of what awaits a sinner after he has died. @Ihedinobi: My twin bro: Good to see you finally joined in. I have noted your comment and you know my heart. I will continue to pray and hope that these men see, I will continue to give a long rope until the Holy Spirit relieves me of the responsibility and then it is feet-dusting time. (You are like Paul and me like Barnabas...but let us not split over John Mark )Please ignore a certain someone who really isn't on this thread. Don't bother replying him.[/quote]if i call you a moslem you will say you are not, but what is the difference between? Hell fire is not a bible based doctrine as can be seen from all other religion that you will say are worshipers of satan and satan says that God will burn people in fire in those religions. when the nation of Israel leave God they burn there children on fire, God said that such an act of burning people in fire has not entered his heart, but you said it has. Jeremiah 7:29-31. but now you say you are a christian but you still carry the same things that satan teach his worshipers and think you are saying the truth and play down on use of the bible as a guide. Without 100% use of the bible how can you claim to represent the God of the bible? When the nation of Israel via off to satan, satan command them to sacrifce their children in fire and God says he hate such, but that is what you are saying that God will do. *sigh* |
Freksy: Now tell us, your position regarding death resulting from sin better fits which of the following two statements?now, from the above it is either 1. Is tru or 2. Is true. It is either man will die 1. Just as God said and God was right. or 2. Man will not die but is an immortal soul and 2. Satan was right. It is your call on whose side you are. The devil is a con star. |
obadiah777: most of the stories in matthew mark luke and john are parables. its a hidden way of making a point. the point being made with that parable is that during the ressurection ( of CHRIST OR 'THE RETURN OF CHRIST ON EARTH' ) people will not be given to marriage ( DOES NOT MEAN PEOPLE WILL NOT GET MARRIED TO THEIR SPOUSES. ITS TALKING ABOUT THEY WILL NOT BE MARRIED TO OTHER DOCTRINES AND PHILOSOPHIES AND IDOLS ). They will be as angels of God in heaven meaning they will be messengers of God. they will only obey God now. no more idols. total allegiance to Godmy dear brother, please dont forget that that statement was made reply to a question that the pharisees ask Jesus about about a woman and seven brothers that got married to her and who will she marry at the recreation? And he said the above that the "resurrected will be as the angels that they will not get married" are you saying that Jesus christ was lying to them? |
frosbel: @Obedia77not only you bro, the guy has gut some skills of weight lifting. Lol. |
obadiah777: THATS A PARABLE. and what the parable is trying to say is that when christ is on earth, no one will be married to their idols anymore. this is another reincarnation verse which further proves the point that spirits are forever. spirits dont get destroyed. souls are immortalhahahahahaha^^^ hahahahaha^^^hahaha lol in 20 languages including chinese. Kiakiakia, MOmom, Hohoho. Lalalala, nanana, bababababa, kokokoko etc. Anything goes for you. |
obadiah777: man is an immortal soul. the body wears out and dies but the spirit lives forever. lets examine this versehow easily you forgot that the disciple Philip saw Jesus "in his heavenly glory standing at the right hand of God" since you forgot you got confuse by the scriptures. Sorry friend. |
obadiah777: you are not your body. your body is simply dust from the ground. you are your spirit. we are spiritual beings wearing a dust suit. the spirit is who you are.let us look at what you are saying this way: the radio is not talking it is the current that is talking, the radio is current it is the current that is talking all radio are current. ![]() Can you get get a living thing independent of the other? No. |
Antivirus92: poor you! The catholic doctrine is based on the bible. Let me tell you, you people are like pharisees of the old. You follow the bible strictly and you fail to understand that the bible is for man and not man for bible. You ignoramus should know that the scripture is flexible and not as rigid as you make it to look. If the scripture is rigid then mary magdalene should have been stoned to death according to the scripture. The catholic doctrine is based 90% on the bible. Do you know how many years it takes the vatican council(bible philosophers) to make out a single doctrine?^^^ thank you. Meanwhile, stay on the topic, peace |
obadiah777: your spirit is a part of you. the question was 'is there a part of you that will exist apart from your body after you die '. the body does not exist alone. so the spirit is a part of you that will exist after you die.i thought it was written that "the spirit goes back to its owner" now it is your property ![]() Why not give it to another person since it is yours? That is if you can? Who ever had a property that cannot use it the way he wants? Is that not why God is the source of our lives? |
DP |
CrazyMan: I gave a passage luke 16:24...it proved that the dead was actually kept in a hilding place pending the final punishment.theology!!! Imagine building a whole theology on a pareble? ![]() For a plan of such a magnitude should the true not have done better? Or it is the theology that has no leg to stand but is grasping on straws? |
Joagbaje: If The Tithe is a blind animal,The Giver redeemes It With Money . True or False ?was it the man's money that was tith at the first place? Redeemed or no redeemed we are still talking about the animal in question and not the man's monetary income your *redeemed* argument makes no sense at all since all we are running around here is still the animal. This redeemed issue is a no contest and especially since tith is not for christians your should stop defrauding people. QED |
italo: @ Ogoamaka and Truthislight,Italio, your example is Good, but the incident in question took place befor the christian guide book the OT was written and it was those example and decission of this apostles that is the guide lines for christians today. The OT covers all expects of a christians life that is necessary for his salvation. "The things that were written affore times were written for our instructions" |
italo: @ Ogoamaka and Truthislight,Italio, your example is Good, but the incident in question took place befor the christian guide book the OT was written and it was those example and decission of this apostles that is the guide lines for christians today. The OT covers all expects of a christians life that is necessary for his salvation. "The things that were written affore times were written for our instructions" |
ogoamaka99: It seems that truthislight is still confused about opinion. I still repeat it, your interpretation of the BIBLE is based on personal opinion and the reason why there are differences in interpretation of the BIBLE is as a result of differences in opinion. I am still saying that your opinion are determined by YOUR FAITH, YOUR LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING, ETC . Look at what happened in Galatians 2:11 But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.^^^ of what use then is the bible to us today then? At that point did the apostles have the NT as we have it today for christians. Since apostle paul was sent to the nation and peter to the Jews and they received instructions to that effect , how will peter have come to know what to do like paul did? Did they not received revelations in parts? Hmmm! |
italo: To Enigma and some other people, "Jesus is God" is the proposition that goes freely from Genesis to Revelation without contradicting other Bible portions.well, then. At the end we get according to our choices/decission. |
italo: To Enigma and some other people, "Jesus is God" is the proposition that goes freely from Genesis to Revelation without contradicting other Bible portions. |
DP |
Joagbaje: Romans 14:5is it a matter of "food" and "days" we are talking about here of matters of doctrine? Importance? Is every things about food and days in the bible? *sigh* |
Enigma: @plappville@enigma the title god/God goes to even man, demons, angels, Jesus and almighty Yahweh. Why should this be an issue nah? |
Enigma: Did you not see this verse in the Hosea passage?my friend enigma, you guys seems to be developing an untoward skills in posting this days. You make your post in quoted format so that quoting it is impossible, is there anything to hide? Hope their is nothing to hide then one will not need to come up with unnecessary vices. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 (of 222 pages)

)
. Is that what Paul and Peter did? Did Peter and Paul search the Bible and come to an agreement on what it says?
