Islam › True Story About Muhammad's Marriage With Zaynab by truthman2012(op): 5:01pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
Many stories have been told by muslims to justify Muhammad marriage with Zaynab, his daughter in-law, without authoritative source(s) to back up their claims. Different muslims fabricate different things to justify the abominable marriage. One of the defence is that it was Muhammad himself who married her to Zaid, his adopted son, therefore he (Muhammad) could not have lusted against her. They have forgotten that Muhammad's sex life was normal at that time because that happened before he had contact with Jubril, who in the name of allahh introduced many immoralities to his life. This is a detailed story of the event with authoritative documented supports: https://davidiqbalkarim./2013/06/03/33/ |
Christianity Etc › Re: She Says Prophet Muhammad is in Hell (Hell Testimony) by truthman2012(m): 4:41pm On Apr 25, 2015*. Modified: 6:29pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
Abuamam: Keep your bogus mistranslations. I speak Arabic fluently, and I know the meaning of the verse. Meanwhile, your fellow evangelical psychos have also 'seen' Adeboye and Kumuyi and your other gods inside hell. Go take those ones out first. You muslim guys are bent on going to hell. You can deny any truth, no matter how clear. Do you understand arabic more than Sahih Bukhari who interpreted the verse to mean what I said? Every soul will taste of death. And ye will be paid on the Day of Resurrection only that which ye have fairly earned. Whoso is removed from the Fire and is made to enter paradise, he indeed is triumphant. The life of this world is but comfort of illusion (Quran 3:185) This verse is explained by Bukhari as follows: Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 12 Number 770 Narated By Abu Huraira : The people said, "O Allah's Apostle! Shall we see our Lord on the Day of Resurrection?" He replied, "Do you have any doubt in seeing the full moon on a clear (not cloudy) night?" They replied, "No, O Allah's Apostle!" He said, "Do you have any doubt in seeing the sun when there are no clouds?" They replied in the negative. He said, "You will see Allah (your Lord) in the same way. On the Day of Resurrection, people will be gathered and He will order the people to follow what they used to worship. So some of them will follow the sun, some will follow the moon, and some will follow other deities; and only this nation (Muslims) will be left with its hypocrites. Allah will come to them and say, 'I am Your Lord.' They will say, 'We shall stay in this place till our Lord comes to us and when our Lord will come, we will recognize Him. Then Allah will come to them again and say, 'I am your Lord.' They will say, 'You are our Lord.' Allah will call them, and As-Sirat (a bridge) will be laid across Hell and I (Muhammad) shall be the first amongst the Apostles to cross it with my followers. Nobody except the Apostles will then be able to speak and they will be saying then, 'O Allah! Save us. O Allah Save us.' There will be hooks like the thorns of Sa'dan in Hell. Have you seen the thorns of Sa'dan?" The people said, "Yes." He said, "These hooks will be like the thorns of Sa'dan but nobody except Allah knows their greatness in size and these will entangle the people according to their deeds; some of them will fall and stay in Hell forever; others will receive punishment (torn into small pieces) and will get out of Hell, till when Allah intends mercy on whomever He likes amongst the people of Hell, He will order the angels to take out of Hell those who worshipped none but Him alone (muslims).The angels will take them out by recognizing them from the traces of prostrations, for Allah has forbidden the (Hell) fire to eat away those traces. So they will come out of the Fire, it will eat away from the whole of the human body except the marks of the prostrations. AT THAT TIME THEY WILL COME OUT OF THE FIRE as mere skeletons.............. Crossing from hellfire will be led by Muhammad himself. Why are you lying to deceive people? |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 4:21pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
EzioAuditore: Alright mate! Whatever floats your boat, whatever you tell yourself to justify worshipping your pagan god. Why else are you abandoning your bible? Lol! I don't really expect you to understand,
2:171 (Y. Ali) The parable of those who reject Faith is as if one were to shout Like a goat-herd, to things that listen to nothing but calls and cries: Deaf, dumb, and blind, they are void of wisdom.
6:39 (Y. Ali) Those who reject our Signs are deaf and dumb,- in the midst of darkness profound: whom Allah willeth, He leaveth to wander: whom He willeth, He placeth on the way that is straight.
2:18 (Y. Ali) Deaf, dumb, and blind, they will not return (to the path). What is the relevance of this? Your justification of Muhammad marrying his daughter in-law has been flawed. Why did you quote the quran for me? Quran has no credibility because it was revealed by a lying spirit who pretended to be the true God. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 2:34pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
EzioAuditore: Your post clearly even stated that Muhammad did not interfere, did it not? Then it brought some sort of bullsh*t hadiths and claims. Is this the best you Christians can come up with? Gibberish and a Hadith related by a well known liar? Smh!
Q. Is it true that the prophet (pbuh) had fallen in love with Zainab due to her beauty? A. If that were true it would not detract from the veracity of the prophet. Muslims admit that he was a human being. It is not unnatural for a man to fall in love. The fact that he is a prophet does not rob him of his natural human emotions. In fact it is true that he loved his wives. However, it is not true that he fell in love with Zainab in the way that is claimed by some critics. They say that once the prophet visited Zaid, the husband of Zainab. Zaid was out at the time, and Zainab was combing her hair. The prophet was struck by her beauty and immediately left saying something to the effect that God changes the hearts of people. When Zaid learnt about this incident he offered the prophet that he would divorce Zainab in order that the prophet may marry her. Accordingly, he divorced her and the prophet married her. Several things point to the lack of truth in this story. First, it is unlikely that the prophet (pbuh) was suddenly struck by Zainab's beauty. Zainab was his cousin. He had known her since childhood. Why would she suddenly appear striking after she was already married to another? Second, the prophet had arranged for her to get married to Zaid. If there was to be an attraction why did the prophet (pbuh) not encourage her to marry none but himself? Third, the fact of the matter was that Zaid's marriage proved to be an unhappy one. Zaid was a former slave and as such was held in low esteem in the eyes of Zainab. He mentioned to the prophet that he intended to divorce his wife. But the prophet advised him to keep his wife and avoid divorce. In the meantime, Zaid intended to divorce his wife, Allah intended to marry her to the prophet. Eventually Zaid could maintain his marriage no longer. He divorced Zainab and Allah declared in his Glorious Book that he has wedded her to the prophet after the proper waiting period was over. This marriage served more than one purpose. First, the prophet was responsible for arranging Zainab's marriage to Zaid. In a sense, then, he was also indirectly responsible for the unhappiness she felt in her marriage. Her marriage to the prophet now provided her the honour she felt she deserved, and exonerated the prophet. Second, Zaid had been adopted as the prophet's son. Eventually, however, the Qur'an prohibited the practice of changing the parental identity of adopted persons. Zaid, then, was to no longer be called "son of Muhammad" but rather "a close friend." The prophet's marriage to the divorced wife of Zaid was a practical demonstration that the adopted relationship was not equal to a real blood-relationship. A man cannot marry the divorced wife of his real son but he can marry the divorced wife of his adopted son. The abolishment of the age-old practice was a positive improvement for the adopted persons. People outside of Islam still continue this practice for their own benefit. They adopt children and rob them of their real identify, making them believe they are real children of the household in which they grow up. When such children realize the truth they suffer much disappointment and grief. The adoptive process continues for the selfish gain of the adoptive parents. But is it not true that children sometimes need adoptive parents? Yes. But they also need to preserve their real identify. This is what Islam ensures. It is the responsibility of the entire community to help children in need. They should be taken in and nurtured but not confused with one's own children. The prophet's marriage to Zainab was a bold measure to forever engrave in the minds of his followers that as much as people would resist change, some changes are worth the effort. Adoptive children should no longer be robbed of their real identities. Nothing in this your long essay tells us that Zaid divorced his wife because she was feeling superior. ''The fact of the matter is Zaid marriage with Zaynab proved to be unhappy one'' says WHO? All your statements are false fabrications. Different muslims formulate different things to justify Muhammad's shameful and lustful marriage with his daughter inlaw. No authoritative source to back up their claims. Was Muhammad like unto Moses? Never! Moses was not a lustful and adulterious prophet who was sleeping around with women, slaves, little girl and even his daughter in-law. Shameless. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 1:54pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
EzioAuditore: You have no point here mate! Did you not see the part where I told you about Zayd telling the prophet of his intention to divorce her? Here's a summary of the events, enough to satisfy everyone with a brain, but of course
Some of the Prophet's marriages were for legislative reasons and to abolish certain corrupt traditions. Such was his marriage to Zaynab, divorcee of the freed slave Zayd. Before Islam, the Arabs did not allow divorcees to remarry. Zayd was adopted by the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and called his son as was the custom among the Arabs before Islam. But Islam abrogated this custom and disapproved of its practice. Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) was the first man to express this disapproval in a practical way. So he married the divorcee of his "adopted" son to show that adoption does not really make the adopted child a real son of the adopting father and also to show that marriage is lawful for divorcees. Incidentally, this very Zaynab was Muhammad's cousin, and had been offered to him in marriage before she married Zayd. He refused her then, but after she was divorced he accepted her for the two legislative purposes: the lawful marriage of divorcees and the real status of adopted children. The story of this Zaynab has been associated in some minds with ridiculous fabrications regarding the moral integrity of Muhammad. These vicious fabrications are not even worth considering here (see Qur'an, 33: 36, 37, 40).
"God has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body: nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers: nor has He made your adopted sons your sons. Such is (only) your (manner of) speech by your mouths. But God tells (you) the Truth, and He shows the (right) Way. (The Noble Quran, 33:4)" I have searched through your posts but couldn't find any hadith or quranic verse as evidence that Zaid divorced his wife because she was feeling superior to him. All I found is your own assertion. Can you post your source here otherwise, your reason is nullified for want of evidence. Until then, the truth remains Zaid was forced to divorce Zynab so that Muhammad could marry her. A disgusting act. Different muslims fabricate different lies about Muhammad's marriage with Zaynab, find them here: http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Menj/zaynab.htm |
Christianity Etc › Re: Since I've Joined Nairaland,what I've Learned About Atheism by truthman2012(m): 1:26pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
menesheh: That still didn't answer any of the questions but rather did raise more deeper questions how the spy camera monster in the sky aka heaven is, a man or woman, white or black, the looks of the vacuum or void he came from, whether he existed alone or with colleagues etc Man or woman? God is a Spirit, not a man or woman. We call Him Father because man is superior in order of creation. Black or white? Spirits don't have colour as they don't have physical bodies. Exists alone? No, there are spirits (angels) with Him as ministers. Now there are humans (saints) staying with Him in heaven. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 1:08pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
EzioAuditore: 1- Zaynab came from a powerful family and Zayd was an adopted slave, in Islam, adopted sons don't even have a share in their adopted fathers inheritance.
2-She did, but the prophet recommended the marriage, how could she reject, but after the marriage, it became apparent, Zayd asked told Muhammad and asked to divorce her, Muhammad told him not to, but eventually it was too much and the marriage ended in divorce.
3- an adopted so. Can't even have his adopted fathers name, that's stealing his true identity, he doesn't have a share in his fathers inheritance, the perk here is that you're not a slave anymore and your adopted father has to take on all the responsibilities of a father. The reasons you gave for Zaid divorcing Zynab have no authoritative backing. They are your own sentiments. Give a source that backs your assertions. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 1:02pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
EzioAuditore: What makes you think you're better qualified than everyone to interpret the Quran? I'm telling you this is what it means and you're arguing that it doesn't? Lol! See unlike the fake bible you parade around, this is actually the book of God, you can't just translate and interpret it however you want, anyways, read....
Thabit narrated it from Anas: "Among the Jews, when a woman menstruated, they did not dine with her, nor did they live with them in their houses; so the Companions of the Apostle (may peace be upon him) asked The Apostle (may peace be upon him), and Allah, the Exalted revealed:" And they ask you about menstruation; say it is a pollution, so keep away from woman during menstruation" to the end (Qur'an, ii. 222). The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Do everything except intercourse. The Jews heard of that and said: This man does not want to leave anything we do without opposing us in it. Usaid b. Hudair and Abbad b. Bishr came and said: Messenger of Allah, the Jews say such and such thing. We should not have, therefore, any contact with them (as the Jews do). The face of the Messenger of Allah (way peace be upon him) underwent such a change that we thought he was angry with them, but when they went out, they happened to receive a gift of milk which was sent to the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him). He (the Holy Prophet) called for them and gave them drink, whereby they knew that he was not angry with them. (Translation of Sahih Muslim, The Book of Menstruation (Kitab Al-Haid), Book 003, Number 0592)"
How about you digest this from your "holy" bible! Friggin jokers!
And if a woman have an issue (her period/menses), [and] her issue in her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever toucheth her shall be unclean until the even. And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation shall be unclean: every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean. And whosoever toucheth her bed shall wash his clothes, and bathe [himself] in water, and be unclean until the even. And whosoever toucheth any thing that she sat upon shall wash his clothes, and bathe [himself] in water, and be unclean until the even. And if it [be] on [her] bed, or on any thing whereon she sitteth, when he toucheth it, he shall be unclean until the even. And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and all the bed whereon he lieth shall be unclean. And if a woman have an issue of her blood many days out of the time of her separation, or if it run beyond the time of her separation; all the days of the issue of her uncleanness shall be as the days of her separation: she [shall be] unclean. Every bed whereon she lieth all the days of her issue shall be unto her as the bed of her separation: and whatsoever she sitteth upon shall be unclean, as the uncleanness of her separation. And whosoever toucheth those things shall be unclean, and shall wash his clothes, and bathe [himself] in water, and be unclean until the even. But if she be cleansed of her issue, then she shall number to herself seven days, and after that she shall be clean. And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtles, or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. And the priest shall offer the one [for] a sin offering, and the other [for] a burnt offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for her before the LORD for the issue of her uncleanness. (From the King James Version Bible, Leviticus 15:19-30)"
How can you treat your women this way? Readers must have discovered that islam is falsehood. Allah says menstruation is a POLLUTION and Muhammad should KEEP AWAY and NOT APPROACH a menstruating woman UNTIL SHE IS CLEAN. Is this not clear enough? Why should a person with his/her senses intact interpret that otherwise. Muslims are like their god, liars. When asked, what do you expect Muhammad to say? He was clearly violating allahh's command and you expect him to enjoin others to do otherwise? It is like asking a criminal to judge others, won't he support crimes? No doubt, something is seriously wrong with muslims' brains. The more they read the quran, the less intelligent they become. I pity them. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Since I've Joined Nairaland,what I've Learned About Atheism by truthman2012(m): 12:29pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
johnydon22: Let me guess you have been praying to him since how come you dont know any of the details? I do know quite well. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 12:25pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
EzioAuditore: Lmao! Is this the best you could come up with? Do you know what keep away meant? You are just so silly! I have warned you that plonkers can not interpret the Quran however they please, Heck, if God forbids such acts, then why are modern scholars encouraging such things?how can you think God wants you to completely keep away from your wife? You can kiss, and hug, and handle her as much as you want, you can ask any scholar you want, like I said, the only thing forbidden is actual sex, don't go around making yourself look like an idiot. What does 'keep away' and do 'not approach' mean in this context? Explain the words in capital. They ask thee concerning women's courses. Say: They are a hurt and a POLLUTION: SO KEEP AWAY FROM WOMEN IN THEIR COURE AND DO NOT APPROACH THEM UNTIL THEY ARE CLEAN. But when they have purified themselves, ye may approach them in any manner, time, or place ordained for you by Allah. For Allah loves those who turn to Him constantly and He loves those who keep themselves pure and clean. (Qur'an 2:222) Waiting. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 12:13pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
"e author=RoyPCain post=33090682]@truthman2012(m): 4:24pm On Apr 24
so this is your problem that couldn't get your mind wrapped around it that your thinking can understand a 'once before married, is an ex of the spouse there is no longer married to.' such a person if a woman, she is single and not currently maaried in any and all cultures and laws of community, until she is married, again to same man or some new man.
Zaynab bint Johsh [RA] was already divorced from Zayd who is actually bin Haritha [RA] and the event of the 2nd marriage of his ex wife made it clear that he was not truly bin Muhammad [SA] as baby Ibrahim or young boy Kassim was bin Muhammad [SA] in the same way Fatimah was binta Muhammad [SA].
haven't you heard 'i am treating him the way or better than i am treating a child born by me'? such a child does not have the public declaration of adoption which may be the only difference between the 'public declaration' since both are treated likr son from the loin.
a father knows his real son. and it is not the same as adopted son, anywhere in the world.
a woman you didn't sleep with but the child for her legal husband you adopt, said child will never have your blood and if he resembles his father, he will look like the other guy not you.
it is Mercy of Allah that He rids you of fake notion of fatherhood you created for yourself.[/quote]"
How does your rigmarole answer the question. Nobody enjoys your writing please. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 12:08pm On Apr 25, 2015 |
EzioAuditore: Smh! Do you know who married Zaynab to Zayd in the first place? It was Muhammad (pbuh) who orchestrated the marriage, zaynab was from a powerful family, this was done in other to raise the status of slaves(Zayd was a slave that was adopted by Muhammad) in Arabia, but after the marriage, it was clear that zaynab felt superior to Zayd, and eventually they separated. That's when Muhammad got married to her, now tell me, are you saying it's forbidden to Marty divorcees? Because most of Muhammads wives were divorcees who couldn't fend for themselves, or are you saying Muhammad showed interest in her while she was married to Zayd? That's a blatant lie!
Behold! Thou didst say to one who had received the grace of Allah and thy favour: "Retain thou (in wedlock) thy wife, and fear Allah." But thou didst hide in thy heart that which Allah was about to make manifest: thou didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah. Then when Zaid had dissolved (his marriage) with her, with the necessary (formality), We joined her in marriage to thee: in order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the Believers in (the matter of) marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have dissolved with the necessary (formality) (their marriage) with them. And Allah's command must be fulfilled.
Go and tell whoever is feeding you these lies to try harder. So, Zaid divorced Zynab because she was feeling superior to her husband. Where is your proof? Didn't she know Zaid was a slave before she married him? Was Zaid still a slave after Muhammad had adopted him? Then why the superior feeling of his wife? Answer the three questions one by one. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Since I've Joined Nairaland,what I've Learned About Atheism by truthman2012(m): 11:52am On Apr 25, 2015 |
johnydon22: God has no beginning, but then again you turn around and persist the universe must have a beginning. .
If your god don't have a beginning then it is also right to say the universe have no beginning therefore needs no creator. . Is the universe the same as its creator? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Since I've Joined Nairaland,what I've Learned About Atheism by truthman2012(m): 11:50am On Apr 25, 2015 |
menesheh: That still didn't answer any of the questions but rather did raise more deeper questions how the spy camera monster in the sky aka heaven is, a man or woman, white or black, the looks of the vacuum or void he came from, whether he existed alone or wirh colleagues etc You want to know His details, pray and let Him reveal Himself to you. If I tell you, you would not believe it. Have a personal relationship with Him. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Since I've Joined Nairaland,what I've Learned About Atheism by truthman2012(m): 11:31am On Apr 25, 2015 |
menesheh: Since the universe can't exist without something (a supreme creator), who then created the creator or did he existed out of same nothing too; while science is busy unraveling the Chinese puzzles of the existence of the universe and life in it hosts, religious believers are busy ranting without even a single achievement to better the welfare of human. God is not a 'thing' or 'something'. He has no beginning, therefore He has no CAUSE. We began to hear of Him after He created the Universe. Psalm 90:2 Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from EVERLASTING to EVERLASTING, thou art God. He existed from everlasting. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Since I've Joined Nairaland,what I've Learned About Atheism by truthman2012(m): 10:49am On Apr 25, 2015 |
The fools say in their hearts that there is no God.
Nothing can cause something. What caused the world to existence? |
Islam › Re: Allah Thought He Could Eradicate Christianity by truthman2012(op): 10:39am On Apr 25, 2015 |
Ifeann: Mohammed's Islamic allah has failed for 1400 years and will keep failing. A prophet without any correct prophecies. allahh will continue to fail in Jesus name. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 8:12am On Apr 25, 2015 |
RoyPCain
You continue to avoid my question. If you can't answer it, drop islam and embrace Christ.
[Quran 4:24 YusufAli] Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
Allah said married women are forbidden to Muhammad to marry. Why did he again enjoin him to marry already married Zynab, the wife of his adopted son?
It was after allahh has spoken that divorcement was quickly arranged between Zaid and Zynab, meaning Zaid was forced to divorce her for Muhammad to marry. If not so, give a brief account of what happened with islamic EVIDENCE(S), and with PARTICULAR INTEREST in what caused Zaid to divorce his wife, Zynab.
Cc: EzioAuditore |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 7:48am On Apr 25, 2015*. Modified: 10:28am On Apr 25, 2015 |
EzioAuditore: Lmao! This post is really shameful! There's nothing sadder than when a christian tries to interpret or dissect islam! Honestly, when I read the post I burst into laughter! Are these dweebs really this clueless and desperate? Is this the best you could come up with? Muhammad slept on the same bed with his wife, he took a bath with his wife...lmao! Who told you that's not allowed when you're fasting? The only thing forbidden is actual sex! I swear these imbeciles never fail to deliver their usual dose of stupidity and naivity! Whenever they try, all they do is sh*t themselves! This post is a mockery of all christians' intelligence, you need to go back to the drawing board because honestly, this s*cks. Lmao! What nonsense are you saying here? Can't you read and understand? Allah says Muhammad and muslims should keep away and not approach women under menstruation. Muhammad didn't keep away and not only approaching, he was even f.ondling a menstruating woman. Is that not an outright breach of allahh's command? Is that not disgusting? Allah said menstruation is a pollution, why should a supposed prophet touch it, especially when fasting? Who is allahh that condones all kinds of immoralities? Muslims are shameless and allahh has tampered with their reasoning faculty as he did to Muhammad, tampering with his brain so that he could forget mistaken revelations he had already revealed. Islam is a fraudulent religion where the god claims to have made contant mistakes and corrected himself many times. Smh! |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 7:05pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
Rilwayne001: 2. Don't abuse, bully, deliberately insult/provoke, fight, or wish harm to Nairaland members OR THEIR TRIBES.
Ishilove seun emusmith  And you have the right to abuse and insult me. Smh! |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 7:00pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
|
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 6:58pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
|
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 6:57pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
Rilwayne001: I am not a terrorist  You are a terrorist. Terrorism begins from fraudulent editing. From abusing to slapping to beheading. |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 6:54pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
malvisguy212: just yesterday, I saw a devoted muslim in the church,he sing praised to God and prayed. God is calling them, God is removing the crop from the weed, the" harvest" Praise the Lord Jesus! Alleluyah!!! |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 6:50pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
Rilwayne001: May God forgive you for blasphemous act.
I am not a satanist.
And when did you turn her/his spokesman? do you think everyone is as dull as you? Laughing at you again! Terrorist. |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 6:43pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
|
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 6:30pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
Rilwayne001: Here is your first problem.
Is jesus God? Was he the one that inspired the OT? Why does he havecto come in humAN form? During his stay on earth, who was in tje heaven? Which sin exactly did he came to die for? Must one believe on him to have eternal life? how about those that came before him? do you believe in trinity? can you prove it with your bible? why aren't you a catholic adherent? and lastly, what gave the the asssurance that you will make it to heaven?
The bible is not accurate with the inconsistency and contradictions in it, do you want ms to delve into that?
No folklores in my book. Since you could edit people's posts, what integrity do you have to accuse the bible of anything? FRAUDSTER! |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 6:25pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
@ An2elect2
Don't follow Rilwayne to debate. He has been editing people's post to give it the opposite of want they mean. I will report him to the moderator. He is a fraudster. |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 6:19pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
Rilwayne001:
 May God forgive you for editing people's post to reflect the opposite. That shows the type of spirit in you. Satanist. |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 5:50pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
[quote author=Rilwayne001 post=33067676][/quote]Muslims are as fraudulent as their allahh. While allahh forged the bible, muslims forge posts on nairaland. Smh! |
Islam › Re: Iranian Muslim Saw Jesus by truthman2012(op): 5:30pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
Rilwayne001:
u sabi him wel wel Heh! heh!! heh!!! Laughing at you in Yoruba. |
Islam › Re: How Muhammad Was Violating The Quran With Impunity by truthman2012(op): 5:24pm On Apr 24, 2015 |
malvisguy212: Surah 5:87: “O ye who believe! Forbid not the good things which Allah hath made lawful for you , and transgress not, Lo! Allah loveth not transgressors.” (Pickthall)
Ibn Mas’ud, who is considered as one of the greatest Muslim scholars, related a well-known incident, which is recorded in numerous Islamic sources. This event will enlighten us on the historical background for the revealing of Surah 5:87. He tells us why Allah revealed this verse to Muhammad. Let us now review this account:
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 13o: Narrated ‘Abdullah (b. Mas’ud): We used to participate in the holy battles led by Allah’s Apostle and we had nothing (no wives) with us. So we said, “Shall we get ourselves castrated?” He forbade us that AND then allowed us to marry women with a TEMPORARY CONTRACT (2) and recited to us: ‘O you who believe! Make not unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you, but commit no transgression .’ (Surah 5:87)
The quranic verse that validates the practice of Mut’a Surah 4:24:
“And forbidden to you are married women, except such as your right hands possess. This has ALLAH enjoined on you. And allowed to you are those beyond that, that you may seek them by means of your property, marrying them properly and not committing fornication. And for the benefit you receive from them, give them their dowries, as fixed, and there is no blame on you what you do by mutual agreement after the fixing of the dowry. Surely ALLAH is All-Knowing, Wise.” (Sher Ali)
You may wonder, where does this verse say anything about Temporary Marriage. Most English translators of the Qur’an hide the true meaning of this verse. The above English translation, like many others, states, “YOU MAY SEEK THEM BY MEANS OF YOUR PROPERTY ,MARRYING PROPERLY .” However, this is a deception by modern translators. In the Arabic Qur’an, the above verse does not use the Arabic equivalent of the word “marriage”. (NIKAH) or any of its derivatives. Instead, it uses the term "ISTAMTA'TUM" which is a derivative of the word "MUT'A" denoting pleasure or ENJOYMENT. “Istamta’tum” is derived from the root m-t-a, which is also the root for “Mut’a.”
Compare now the above translation of Surah 4:24 with the following translation by renowned Muslim scholar, Ibn Kathir:
Surah 4:24: “Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (slaves) whom your right hands possess. Thus has Allah ordained for you. All others are lawful, provided you seek them (with a dowry) from your property, desiring chastity, not fornication. So with those among them whom you have enjoyed, give them their required due, but if you agree mutually (to give more) after the requirement (has been determined), there is no sin on you. Surely, Allah is Ever All-Knowing, All-Wise.”
Many English translators of the Qur’an know that the civilized world will be horrified by the presence of such teachings in the Qur’an. Thus, they do some damage control to the uncivilized teachings of Allah. They conceal the true intention of the verses and distort the true meaning of the Qur’an to suit western audiences. They do this because they are ashamed of Allah’s teachings in the Qur’an and they seek ways to make it palatable. Surah 4:24 was revealed towards the beginning of the Prophet’s stay in Medina. By the time this verse was revealed, Mut’a had become a legal custom in Medina. It was looked upon as a kind of marriage and was referred to by the term “Istimta’a.” This term literally means, “To seek enjoyment.” On an occasion when the Prophet made a lesser pilgrimage to Mecca, the women of Mecca made themselves up especially for the event. Some of the Companions complained about the long separation from their wives, and the Prophet replied: “THEN GO AND ENJOY (ISTAMTA'A) THIS WOMEN” Thanks for the expositions. God bless you. I think truth is fruitless to muslim posters on nairaland. But there are those innocent muslims who found themselves in islam by birth. God may use the exposures we are doing of satan who disguise as islamic allahh to take mankind to hell. I only pity billion of muslims who are not privy to the dirt and evil of islam. |