₦airaland Forum

Chillisauce:
See my oga own. Oya your turn

https://www.covermale.com/image/cache/data/CM166-White-M-600x600.jpg

....granma...I don tol you...stay off dem porn sites


TV

Mindfulness:
I had nightmare and lost my appetite indeed but I couldn't stop laughing too.

kneehighbootz, where are you?

...dayuum...I had to like this...real foine and super hot bobo....is that it? A regular beach snap of a happy guy having a fun time . Now where are your threats?

Ode, you would have had more leverage dissing me and threatening without showing it. Now it's out there, people will only envy and wonder if you need vari-focals.

Not only righteous...but also smokin' hot


TV

^{...let's see what y'all are working with....anybody? Didn't think so}

Chillisauce:
Where is the front view?

You are dodging me ekwa?

Ôk o.

...with your pacemaker?...that one na murder now


TV

Chillisauce:
So TV doesn't wanna post the front view let me size the sledged hammer?

Make I go clean my toilet. Show us bak view come dey hide the koko. Mtcheeew

...the same back view that has had Mindfulness unable to eat or sleep and talk of nothing else for over a month...give me my props jor .


TV

shaybebaby:
But not ugly like....

You know she puts you in the shade ...you and all the other GDT's up in here...and non of you can get the butt...only hype it


Prove me wrong...if anyone can post a pic that is finer than my wife...or a husband that is fitter than me, I shall provide all the pix and detail about me you like and deactivate...or stay and be your serf...10 mins before I go chop and catch upon the Olympics...20.40 UK time


TV

francis18:
TV01 SHAYBEBABY

IS THAT TROUSER?HOW COME THE SHOES LOOKS LIKE THEY ARE WEARING HER?

Totally as expected....no shape, no fashion sense, wack weave and as plain as photocopying paper...best remove it before the site crashes .


TV

Chillisauce:
Forget that thing. Iweight ke. Do you want me to post my napkin picture for you..

Mé wey get 4 packs.

Where the other part of the photo N'a. Let me know whether é reach 16 inches .

...how can I refuse?...giving old cargoes some succor and delight as their memories fade. This is Shabebaby' favourite - you can't DP this one, she will fight you .

Stay tuned, more to come...please, don't go and fight oga out of frustration 0!


TV

Chillisauce:
So our English master has been splashing his arrzz on this nairaland. Wonders shall never end. I thought it was a joke. Abeg where the photo make I see the shape of the arssss

Buhahaha.
But wait o. How the yansh carry appear here. I thought he was born twice.

Ewohhhhh.


Crackhaus wey your own yansh photo. Abi na black baret

...old cargo emeritus Chilli how far, how's your never-ending battle with the weight ? If you want to see just ask. Please change into loose fitting clothing, the sight of it will only be surpassed by the excitement you felt when your new dentures arrived .

Feel free to discuss it with the men in your life like Shaybebaby does


TV

Timbuktuo:
I would ignore you but, we know lies repeated over time begin to seem true. Prove, with relevant quotes, the comment(s) where TV supported my opinions which conflict with his religious beliefs. I asked you for this earlier and you azontoed away from the question misdirecting as always. Mindfulness, don't be a liar.

So, Shaybebaby is married?

Mindlessness is both godless and lacking a strong cultural heritage. Hence she lies like she farts - from any available orifice . Thanks for the challenge, hopfully enough people know her modus operandi by now. Mindfulness, come, which orifice did you pull the 500'000 Syrian refugees taken in by Saudia Arabia from .

shaybebaby:
You got that right honey bunch.
Son's dad is a whole lot more involved than these losers who claim they are the bee's knees.
Off out now to do my good deed day of the day for a friend but that slowpoke that posts pictures of his azz had better have pictures of him spending quality time with his kids in everyday life or shut up because imma spam this thread with pics and videos of a father whose life revolves around his son.
Hope you've had a great week.

...involved? All the way from Bologna every 4th weekend of the month. Get outta here


TV

Mindfulness:
He didn't but he chose to ignore your solution to the problem (CHEATING / ADULTERY = a cardinal sin in your and his world view - THEORETICALLY ) because you like to support each other - when you feel that you are not strong enough on your own .

For those of us whose righteousness is in Christ, our enemies will always be confused and confounded. While we will be as bold as lions .

Stop wasting your time looking for something to pin on me. Back to your duty station - go hype my left butzzz cheek . You wan picshure abi? Then earn it.

https://www.nairaland.com/3295175/why-common-most-wives-need#48583755

Hi Innovestor, nothing new under the sun. I applaud your desire to restore normalcy in your home. But please don't countenance covenant breaking or even threats of it as a means to that end.

I posted my piece before Tim. And, I didn't cherry pick any other respondents post either, not even yours. Though to repeat, Mindfulness, please stop giving relationship advice, you truly suck at it .


TV

Mindfulness:
Are you surprised?

And his best buddy TV, the self-proclaimed advocate of the sacred institution called marriage and Christianity, supports him on a thread where he tells a husband to cheat on his wife. Confused lot.

Ode Do you also need mudballs placed over your eyes to be able to see? Just like the dullard failed to recognise Tim' sarcasm here, likewise you failed to comprehend me there.

Following me around from thread to thread. Increasing obsessiveness. You've broken no laws sha, maybe I'll throw you a bone - pix loading. So, hows my left buttz cheek doin'?


TV

Obodo999:
Dishonest. A single mother is a LIAR. It’s how she gets what she wants. It’s how she manipulates people. It’s how she takes care of her kids. It’s how she survives in this world.
Single mothers lie. And they LIE ALL THE TIME. They lie to men about their age, their height, their weight, how many kids they have, the job they do.
On top of the lies they tell to others They lie to themselves. They lie about about how beautiful they are. They lie telling themselves they’re still a catch. They lie telling themselves they still have a chance with a good man. They lie telling themselves that their lives will be happily ever after one day.
The horrible truth is without those lies most of those single mothers would realize how pathetic their lives are. How they have no options in the dating scene. That they’re at the bottom of the barrel in the dating scene and the only men who want them are pathetic Manginas and thirsty Simps.

Shaybebaby, does this strike you as autobiographical ? Mindfulness shamer alert ! I should take lessons from this guy


TV

Sex in marriage is both a right and an obligation. Yes, one should pay attention to romance, certainly, one must be considerate given sensitive or difficult conditions or situations, but the fact remains, sexual intimacy is a particular of marriage.

The issue OP has brought here is not “his” problem, it’s their problem, and the will is lacking on her part. She should be looking at how to resolve this even more, or at least as much as he is, as she is failing in her wifely duties.

I laugh when I hear strident advice about what “he needs to do”, and changes “he needs to make”. Especially when the advice is all around romancing, woo’ing and pampering her .

The truth is, we do not know the root cause of the problem here, but a good and understanding wife should make all efforts to restore normalcy. If he has the worst halitosis, she can communicate that (as sensitively as possible) and support him through it. Likewise if he has any other physical or grooming issue.

And again, if the issue is the stress of their day-to-day life, she should be working as assiduously as he is to make fundamental changes and create time for them to rekindle their passion.

If the issue is her low libido, again, she needs to understand that she is obligated to make efforts to satisfy him. Like Timbuktou said, you can’t negotiate attraction, and likewise a man should not have to pander or graft for what is his by right. So I may prescribe a different approach, but I agree, men too dey eff up!

And if the issue is his loss of status or desirability in her eyes, woo’ing and romancing her will make his stock fall even further – she’ll soon despise him, or at best codedly friendzone her spouse.

It’s why I advise men to marry younger/fitter women, and ones who naturally acknowledge their dominance and headship. Not dominance as in being tyrannical, or for reasons of control, but leading and being in some ways more mature and learned. I wonder the age/status gap between OP and his wife?

Younger/fitter, because when the stresses of life come upon women, the older and less fit they are, the more less likely they will be make the effort required to keep in shape and make pleasing you a priority. And the more likely it is that you will find yourself in a place where you are duty bound to fulfil your obligations, but getting little by way of satisfaction in return.

Would a dutiful husband become a vassal in his own home? Does OP develop headache when the bills are due? Or when his wife needs aso ebi or favors for her family, does she first clear a weekend and map a schedule of extra special TLC for him ?

Men run your homes. Address issues at root and be prepared to make long-term structural changes if required. By all means romance her, certainly woo the butt of her. But do it because she deserves it and you want to. Not to curry sexual favor, or pander to her sense of entitlement or failings, dammit! I’ll stop now lest I punch a hole in my lappy .


TV

Hi Innovestor, nothing new under the sun. I applaud your desire to restore normalcy in your home. But please don't countenance covenant breaking or even threats of it as a means to that end.

First peruse this thread, and particularly my comments therein - https://www.nairaland.com/1845744/intimate-incompatibility-marriage#25285431. That speaks mostly to the bio-mechanical aspects. Please appropriate what is relevant to your situation.

There may be some overlap from the above post/thread, but equally important is to touch on the bio-dynamics. That is the situation in your home, both your family circumstances and the "mutuality" between the both of you.

Men and women view sex differently. Indeed, their perceptions and oft times responses to every stimuli or situation is typically different, and usually for good reason - and largely by design. Understanding our differences and working to harmonise them is key to healthy relationships and happy homes.

Your situation could be due to;

1. stress/work overload, leaving your wife tired. Things like work, anxieties, childbirth etc. have to be managed and hopefully overcome to restore normalcy
2. the attraction - painful to say, let alone hear - may have waned/died. You have to take steps to restore/revive it. Basically increasing your status/desirability in the eyes of your wife. Women will make an effort to please men they respect
3. she may simply have a low drive - see above post. If she is well cultured or of deep faith, she will actually know it's her duty to please you. If you are, go to God sharpish.

Try and pinpoint the main issue - as there may well be a combination and take it from there. Please learn to ignore the godless misandrists that abound here, they'll just enervate you and cause a loss of focus.

All the best as you build your home.


TV

Stillfire:
I'm pretty fine!!!

Good to hear. Always good to hear from you up in here...

Stillfire:
They are 'exodusing' to the land of options and FOREIGN opportunities.

...but I often have to disagree. . Be it foreign men, or foreign men in distant lands, at a community level, na lie.

Nothing has changed. Black women are as a group lower down the desirability hierarchy. This is plain fact. Would this additional toxicity you speak of make them more or even less desirable? Not to mention they are still not shot of the cray-cray, wahallasome, ghettochick image they have long struggled with .

Stillfire:
African American women have been sold the disastrous ideology of black men only. Not any more! The black community is toxic.

AA women have, do and will always prefer black men . Same as black women the world over. Only black men match them for the high octane intimacy they crave - you get me

Stillfire:
Over 60% of black women have been sexually assaulted before they reach 18. Any sensible black woman would have as little as possible association with the toxic black community. http://sojournerspassport.com/last-call-to-evacuate-black-residential-areas-before-the-peace-walls-go-up/

Women of other races/communities claim equally horrendous figures. And the scope for what constitutes sexual assault is so wide as too trivialise the problem. It does not actually change anything.

Stillfire:
Numerous blogs have been set up to aid in the campaign of killing this damning 'black men' ideology. Black female consciousness INDEPENDENT of the toxic black community is being encouraged. The efforts so far have not been in vain. There is now a proliferation of non-black men and black women relationships. That diehard black man only mentality must die! I reject it!!!!

Black woman, non black-man (of any race) is still a minority pairing. At an individual level, it will work, and possibly quite well for some. Others will manage, some knowing they settled. I have no problem with male/female pairings of whatever hue and for whatever reason.

The good news is most black men - like other men - marry women of their own race. And all races can easily accommodate some admixture. It shouldn't do any harm and will likely be beneficial.

Black women (and men) would be best served by restoring a healthy male/female dynamic between them, and strong families to facilitate this. That would make them all round more desirable. Then, when they did choose to marry out, their superior pedigree would command a premium .

Please don't reach for your colt 45 - spoken as a lover of black women and happily married to one

TV

Mutaino7:
If this post has not enlighten some people then maybe you should stop discussing it further.. It will be a precious waste of time to write something as clear as this and the targeted audience are still wallowing in arrogant ignorance. But oga Tv dem NL syd chicks like you oh! keeping your pics Ha! When next you dream about masquerade chasing you, then know NL chicks aint faraway.

Word bro', it is onerous and tiresome. Truth however, has to be defended. I don't do it so much for the soi disant "enlightened", but moreso for those that may be swayed by the pleasing sounding but deceitful clichés that pass as reasoned debate, and those that may not give it much thought.

You honour them "syd chicks" is way too lofty for them. Some of them have whole galleries of my pix posted over the years, and wait longingly for more . Many spend evenings reading and re-reading my old posts. Masquerade ke? I always sleep peacefully and have sweet dreams. Although some of them could pass for such in the flesh .


TV

pippimp:
Your religious belief. Really? An atheist could as well use that same argument to deny you freedom on various levels.

Simplistic and untrue. You are free to view believers as abnormal and religious belief as immoral. You are in no way forced to participate in religious celebrations.

And again, not only people with religious belief abhor homosexuality/notions of "orientation". Many non/unbelievers do so too. Hence my reference to religious belief and conscience.

And more importantly my religious belief makes no demands on an unbeliever. No non/unbeliever has to teach his children that religion is good or moral. They don't have to accept there is a God, or worship Him. They can blaspheme with no consequence. It comes with no rights that demand participation or assertive action by non/unbelievers.

pippimp:
That he does not believe in any God and would not want to compromise his/her right to his/her beliefs or, compel them to violate their conscience, by accepting you as normal and being forcibly made to participate in your celebrations. It's a slippery slope dude. Why is this concept of individual freedom so difficult for you to understand?

Poor attempt at an echo that does not actually follow. You are free to view religious belief as abnormal and/or immoral. You are in no way forced to participate in religious celebrations. Of course if you could show how people are forced it would help, but you cannot. If you've anything other than trite reductionism in the manner of "love is love" , ideological cant, or false equivalence, please share. Otherwise I'm done.

The wrongful notion of "sexual orientation" comes with demands on others as it is coupled with a slew of supposed rights. It impairs the individual freedoms of those who do not subscribe or wish to participate, for belief or conscience sake.

It produces clashes and conflicts with other supposed rights such as religious freedom. These are often contrived by activists to cause harm to those simply exercising their freedoms. Hence questions like this are both reductionist and deceitful

pippimp:
How does someone else's sexual orientation hinder your rights and freedom?

But you must know that. Try leavening your enlightenment with some truth.


TV

^{...and to be clear, I speak as a Christian, don't expect a defense for other, or all faiths/religions.}

pippimp:
How does someone else's sexual orientation hinder your rights and freedom?

You didn't, as requested, define sexual orientation in law or science. You've merely resorted to a simplistic reductionism. But I'll play to make the point.

Why should someones "sexual orientation" (not that you've shown it's a thing) compromise my right to religious belief or, compel me to violate my conscience, by accepting it as normal and being forcibly made to participate in it's celebration.

There is the rub. Have whatever "sexual orientation" you desire, but I should be free for conscience sake to decline involvement, or agree that it is moral, or worthy of normalising - by right. So your whole "forcing of beliefs onto others" assertion is something demanding rights on the basis of "sexual orientation" demands of others.

And we haven't even touched on the social cost.

All you have is cant.


TV

pippimp:
I really don't have too much time so I will he quick. In America, you cannot deny a person service because of race, colour, or sexual orientation. In the 60's, blacks were denied services because of the colour of their skin. Think about that.

I already outlined why the whole notion of "sexual orientation" is nothing more than an ideological ruse. And one designed to hep destroy notions of morality and common decency.

But let me indulge you. How in legally, medically, or biologically is sexual orientation defined? What hard science is behind it? We all know that things like race, although essentially social constructs, are immutable physical traits.

How is sexual orientation rightfully afforded the same status/categorisation as something like race or sex. What is this enlightenment that has come to some countries and people, but not others? Why does a preference for certain sexual acts by some people engender privileged/protected status and a whole slew of rights and benefits?


TV

Timbuktou:
Don't mind the wench. She is unworthy to unlace Mrs. Tim's shoes. She wan look free cinema but ma lie.

...no min' am, she wan look better thing and torture herself reflecting on her sad and lonely existence. Has she ever posted a pic of herself? Partner lasan lasan


TV

shaybebaby:
I dare you to post her picture again. I reiterate..she is minging!
Timbuktou, if the lady standing with your son decked in blue is YOUR mrs, then.................

She is a minger as well. Sorry to the pair of you :p

....dad...did she just call mum a minger?


TV

Timbuktou:
Shaybebaby, you are back from hospital admission now. Instead of you to do jeje, you're jumping up and down like C.Ronaldo abi? They will finish you again, you will have high fever and escape for two years. . Are you a masochist ni?

Bro'...for the inconsolably lonely, aging, and at best plain - even in her youth - baby mama, any kind of attention is good. Careful 0, this type can will anything into reality! In her head, you probably have ardent suitor status


TV

^{...it's scarily easy to acquire orisirisi, obsessives, fanatics, votares etc. on a place like NL. See why I follow no one and studiously avoid PM's}

Mindfulness:
The righteous and morally superior TV insulting other people's families, not only mine. No problem. We don't care.
In Michelle Obama's voice: When they go low, we go high!
@bold
Dullard, I have your picture as well.
But I know why you won't post it here again even though it would perfectly fit into the context of homos.exulaity.
Old man flaunting his azz on NL.

After spewing threats like Saul of Tarsus, you are now feigning victim status . You are so lacking in any kind of content. Having my picture is now your boast . Keep hyping that my left butzz cheek . And no one has begged you 0! My stock can only rise - and I even have minions like you to do the donkey work

shaybebaby:
Okay, I'm going to go there... His wife is fugly, that why I said she must have a beautiful heart because the surface ain't it at all.
Sorry but it's what I thought but felt it would be mean to the poor lass who has done nothing wrong except marry this turd.

...fortunately others have been there before you - and returned a truer testimony . But even if they hadn't, we all know that emanates from a special place of near unquenchable spite. A bile filled rant, motivated by the bitterness of the benefit dependant and inconsolably lonely baby-mama . Sorry eh !

Timbuktou:
She did? Tufiakwa.

Not only did she do it, she shamelessly crows about it, encourages others to tread the same path, and blasphemy of blasphemies, insists her god wanted her to do it as it made her happy . It doesn't get more amoral than one who worships her own belly .

GDTs gathering, pictures of mass destruction loading


TV

pippimp:
I honestly believe you confuse yourself in an attempt to sound eloquent. My argument has always been about the freedom of everyone to do as they wish as long as the safety or rights of others are not trampled on. Obviously you disagree with this else you would not have been so ardent in countering all my comments. Every single comment you've made so far is an assertion to such a right to dictate and impose your views on others. Or don't you read/comprehend what you write before posting them?

And no one, anywhere - in a decently ordered society - has ever had such a right.

The safety and rights of individuals are always to some degree subject to the collective whole in any ordered society. I have not forced my beliefs, I have merely maintained that this individual freedom you are prating on about, does not bear scrutiny.

Aside that, I have only taken a position against the normalisation of "homosexual" acts. As previously stated, I am not concerned about peoples desire to abuse their bodies.


TV

Stilly how far? I'm posting here because of you, I'd typically give this one a miss,but had to query the below;

Stillfire:
African American women's eyes are beginning to clear now. A lot of them are on mass exodus from black men and the black community in total, lmao.

Please ma, where is the promised land they are "exodusing" to?


TV

pippimp:
And yet you could not answer one simple question. What gives you the right to impose your beliefs on others? How and why is this so difficult?

And where did I claiim or assert such a right? No answers, so hide under bogus assertions .


TV

pippimp:
It is utterly embarrassing that this simple concept of rights, liberties and freedom is so difficult for most people to understand. How hard is this to comprehend?

Your embarrassment is your woeful inability to clearly articulate what you mean, hence the resort to pious sloganeering.

pippimp:
The issue is not whether i approve of homosexuality, incest, etc, but the right of people to do whatever they want as long as it does not harm another person or hinder other peoples rights, or against the law.

How abjectly pitiful your mewling sounds . What is a right? Is the law the base or sole arbiter of what is morally right or wrong ?

Where in jurisprudence, religion or anyplace else is a homosexual defined? There are only homosexual acts. To fall for the simplistic ruse of men claiming intrinsic identity to justify their deviant ways, then arguing for unique categorisation and rights associated with that false premise, is a bare-faced fraud one does not need to be educated to see through.

Why is bestiality wrong? why is paedophilia wrong? Some "homosexuals" have argued that sexual contact with minors is often beneficial, whilst others are actively campaigning for a reduction in the age of consent.

If a person is persecuted for not wanting to be party to homosexual acts or celebrations of sodomy due to conscience or religious reasons, how are his rights not being violated? What wrong has he done, what so called right has he denied by simply declining.

What & whom determines what is harm, especially at the societal level. Are individual rights and freedoms totally oblivious to the collective. flourishing?

pippimp:
We cannot all be the same. It is just not possible. We cannot like everyone we see or know. What separates us from Animals is our ability to co exist despite our differences.

What are you even trying to articulate here?

pippimp:
Who made you judge jury and executioner. Trying to make someone conform to your beliefs has been proven by history to be disastrous.

Histrionics again. Where have I said anyone has to conform to my beliefs? Yet everyone has to conform to your "let everyone do as they please, as long as they don't "harm" anyone rubric

pippimp:
Why is this so difficult to understand for God's sake? Imagine a world where let's say someone like Muhammed had force everyone to be muslim, how would that have worked out for you? How would it have been if the crusaders had made everyone christian? I'm pretty sure you are against it depending on what religion you follow. So, if you are against that, then why would you want to force yours on another person? No one seems to be able to answer that question.

When it comes to our collective norms and morés everyone has to exercise degrees of restraint to ensure the flourishing of the whole. Islam is still hell-bent on forcibly converting the whole world under pain of death. The crusades where a response to that threat.

And quit with the baseless assertion that anyone is trying to force their beliefs on you. Why are those who believe marriage is a male/female institution being forced to agree that it is unsexed and participate against their will? It is "enlightened" progressive tyrants like yourself who are forcing their beliefs on everyone.

You and the rest of the GDT's on here really need to learn the difference between enlightenment and hive-mind indoctrination. It's almost as wide as the gulf betwixt truth and falsehood.


TV

Mindfulness:
Do you really think that I will have serious discussions with you after seeing this picture?

You've never posted anything that anyone, with any discernment has taken seriously. Now you have your fixation with my fundament as an excuse.

Mindfulness:
I choose where you post the pictures. Are you going to finally post it or should I do it for you?

- you must be mistaking me for the 2nd hand man you stole . You, "choose where I post my picture" . The picture is mine to post or not. I can post, re-post and un-post as I choose . Don't confuse me with the weakling you have at home. Is it money you use to control him or was it for "papers"? We know it ain't with your looks or finery .

Mindfulness:
If you don't post it, I will spam the entire forum to show how the righteous one, the biggest moralizer of all presents himself on a public forum.

Come, has anyone here begged Mindlessness not to post? I already told you your level. You remain pegged . Hype-master for half of my buttz (probationary ). Can you hear yourself? You will devote your time to posting - in addition to your constant discussing - my picture over NL? Just remember the post is unpaid .

A sclerotic and dried-out old boiler threatening me, with my own picture. Needless to say, whether you post it or not, my stock can only rise . Although I appreciate it will stimulate you obvious obsession with me . Of course you can post your own "bulldog swallows fly cum pig with lipstick face", or your beached whale body, or perhaps that of the carcass of a man you no longer find in the least bit attractive .

What a loser


TV

Mindfulness:
Oya!

The picture!

But don't cheat, I want the one where you flaunt your azz in your black bikini!

If you don't post it, I will spam the entire forum to show how the righteous one, the biggest moralizer of all presents himself on a public forum.

Pronto TV!



And the God of in.cest. Adam fvcked Eve and their children must have procreated with one another.

It will go up before the weekend is over, I'll resurrect the other thread, so as not to spam this one. Tender cogent arguments here instead of hiding behind my big black butts ...but please hype it a little more as is your hype-master remit . Lot's of old cargoes, votaries, deluded single mamas, inverterate adulters etc. etc. who will be glazed of eye . I'm off out now, as I guess are others. it's the weekend don't you know? You sre so 1 dimensional.

TV

^{...consanguinity would not have been a problem with a near pure genome, and a necessity with but a handful of people. You can't out-think your creator, or even one of his most unworthy vessels}

Mindfulness:
Liar! Go to church and repent or else your sadistic God will burn you in hell.


You really want me to post your bikini pictures, don't you? The shaming that is your forte will bite your azz.

Karma is a good thing.

You are a real dullard. And full of false bravissimo. You are trying to threaten me with my own pic ? I will post it before you do, and more. I mean really? Show us a pic of your spouse-snatcher sef now, or one of the specimen you stole. And please, you are only dedicated hype-master for my left buttz cheek, not the whole thing - we don't want you to die of excitement overload now do we .

TV

^{...oh, and you got the wrong God, mine is neither sadistic, nor eternally burns people in hell}

pippimp:
You are missing the point. Personally, i believe that sex between two people of the same gender is absolutely disgusting but that is not the issue. The issue is, because i don't like it, does that mean people should not be free to do what they want as long as it does not harm me?

So this is the vaunted understanding of individual liberties, freedoms and rights that makes you feel everyone who does not share it resides in the absence of all light .

How does the topic of the OP harm you? Why is incest wrong?
Is individual harm to you the only thing you could come up with? What about a "social cost", which burdens the collective, is that not a consideration ?

pippimp:
Do you know why terrorists do what they do? Because they believe that they are right and you are wrong. Your way of life is abnormal. So, by your logic, since they believe that, then it is ok for them to kill you, right?

Straight to false equivalence, I actually hoped, secretly wanted there to be something more. My bad.

Because I don't feel deviant behaviour should be normalised or taught to children as such, or people forcibly made to consider it morally good and celebrate it - when it it is unequivocally deleterious for society - makes me a terrorist, wanting to kill others

pippimp:
Just because you believe their way is wrong does not mean you can impose your beliefs on them.

Which belief have I sought to impose? I have taken a well reasoned position that same sex intimacy is at best dysfunctional and should not be normalised. Likewise other forms of deviant sexual behaviour, of which there is a long list. Outside that, how they abuse themselves is down to them.

pippimp:
And you might want to brush up on your history. Homosexuality has been in existence since the dawn of time. Look up greece, the Roman empire, france, and most arab countries etc. The only reason everyone is so aware of it now is because of the internet. You can't say because you don't like something you can then shackle someone else. This is why Africa is so backwards.

I clearly stated this behaviour has been at the best on the periphery of all societies throughout all time and you make a statement suggesting I did not know it had been extant since the dawn of time

pippimp:
There are many people i don't like i work with but i have to work with them and be civil. If we all all acted on our pre dispositions, this planet would be destroyed. Read up on the spanish inquisition and the crusade and you will understand why it is not a good idea to impose your beliefs on other people.

I should read up? . What has anything that has been said that suggested crusades or an inquisition. Do you consider histrionics a discussion tool?

pippimp:
What christians did then would make ISIS members look like kindergarten kids today. While you are at it, read up on Hitler and his reasons for killing six million jews. His thought process was no different from yours.

I should read up?
What was the genesis of the crusades? How many died? The crusades where primarily a defensive reaction to marauding Islamic bloodletting. They were not expansionary be it in an imperial or religious sense. And the bloodletting that continues till this day. There has been a wholesale unabated genocide of Christians in the middle east. Have you the faintest of clues?

And I note your sly support for ISIS. You are the type of terrorist sympathiser the West could do without. Please return home as soon as your visa expires

Was Hitler a Christian. He was a humanist, only such believe in racial supremacy. So, your charter of rights is that everyone is free to do whatever, as to take collective moral positions makes one a terrorist, crusader, or Hitlerian .

pippimp:
Cc cococandy

Coco has already started to drop her absurdly reductionist one liners which stymie, rather than lend nuance to a discussion.


TV

Mindfulness:
But the average Nigerian's morality is at the level of a three-year-old: I will do anything if I can do away with it.
Not: I will do what is right because my moral development extends that of a baboon.

The bold absolutely takes the biscuit ; from someone who stole anothers husband, just because it made her happy and she could get away with it. Whatever the Nigerian average of which you speak is, you are way, way below it. You personify amorality


TV