₦airaland Forum

DoctorAlien:
Gen. 2:7 KJV defines "soul" as a combination of body and breath of life. Therefore SOUL = BODY + BREATH.

Just like GOD said the blood of Abel was crying unto Him out of the ground, the things which these men suffered demand justice.

hehehe

You are cherry picking are you aware d bible also translates soul as dead body?

"And the LORD said unto Moses, Speak unto the priests the sons of Aaron, and say unto them, There shall none be defiled for the dead (nephesh, psuche) among his people" (Lev. 21:1).

DoctorAlien:
1 Thess. 4:16 says the "dead in Christ" will rise when Christ returns, not bodies. How can a soul be in Heaven and bodies resurrect when Christ comes back? The soul is not separate from the body.

Ecclesiastes 12:7
New International Version
and the dust returns to the ground it came
from, and the spirit returns to God who gave it. You need to read the bible more.

The bible says that after you die, you body goes to dust but you SPIRIT goes back to God.

On the last day God will raise the body from the dust and put back the spirit.

The thread has finally been derailed

shadeyinka:
You win on this point...technically

However, the early christians were NOT Roman
Therefore, they cannot be Roman Catholic.

If they were Roman, the Epistles would have been written in Latin and Not Greek.

There I rest my case.

Since you have began reading please continue your study. you don't have to be 'roman' to be catholic, there are greek catholics, syrian catholic....
the term 'roman' catholic was coined by protestants.

seunmsg:
You need a brain.

I am sure u are talking to yourself, u really need to see a doctor.

sorry dear, we care.

donnie:
My dear, you are not talking to a novice, we know these things. Satan has not changed. He uses those same tactics over and over again.

Meaning only those within the "recognized" group can preach. Meaning the Holy Spirit cannot fill any random man or woman to proclaim Jesus spontaneously.

And these religious groups are "recognized" by the same government right?

Are we not saying the same thing?

I guess you reserve the right to criticise. The law is similar to d one el-rufai wants to pass in his state.

brocab:
Thanks for your own concern, but you don't have to feel sorry, it's part of history-to be truthful having this life, had made me into a better person I am today.
Yes it did come under the Australian Govt body, but the Catholic Church had their hands full, they were well and truly involved, "Big time" we were sent either to a institution the Catholic Church had, or we were sent to another religious organisations that was under the Catholic Church's control.
[color=#990000]We were prolonged in prisons, we were placed under Marshal Law, we were made Ward of the state, they ripped us away from our families-the Govt had stolen us and sure enough they turned a blind eye, against the evil treatment we retrieved by the Church, "No-one could stand for us" evil took control under the banner of the Church, a well planned organisation of special nun's

which center were u placed?

Emasearu:
@brocab Sir, I was asking for your e-mail so as to tell you how sorry I felt after reading about the stolen generation . I was going to tell you that I couldn't even read all about because I didn't have the stomach for it. Although, the book I read which was written by a professor - Prof Peter Read - who worked for an Australian govt ministry, said it was mainly an Australian govt body that was responsible for what happened to you.

Brocab is just insincere the stolen child policy was by the government they stole kids and drop them in religious or secular institute like Moore River Native Settlement, Doomadgee Aboriginal Mission, Ebenezer Mission, and Wellington Valley Mission, Beagle Bay and Garden Point, most of these were run by protestant, anglicans, methodist, presbyterians, infact the catholic ones had more humane conditions, but u'll never see brocab condemn his fellow protestants, he only uses it to justify his hatred of the Catholic church.

Timiblanko:
I never believe this men again since the first lie, walk by example and lay good example

What lie?

seunmsg:
Kukah is a corrupt slowpoke that nobody takes seriously again. He has lost his relevance and respect since the days of Jonathan.

Dummy so you can't even read and understand simple english. You need Jesus.

Elnino4ladies:
Watch as sheeples defend this clown smh

What did he say that is untrue?

Is he wrong?

Abbeyme:
Did he really say that? Did he mean it or he is just being sacarstic..

I wonder what he was thinking when he said that....

How do you feel about the payment of N42m by a man as tithe to a
church in Benue State?
This is chicken feed compared to what contractors and businessmen and women are paying to corrupt church men, who are largely partners in crime and claim to be praying for rich people. So, it is important to check and cross-check your facts. You should educate us by telling us what really happened now that the right hand knows what the left is doing.

shadeyinka:
I did read your post.

There is only ONE "His Holiness"
And that is God Himself

You can argue that at your leisure for today you have been proven wrong. Orthodox use d title pope and the recognised the popes of Rome until the schism...

shadeyinka:
The term Pope mean "Father"
But when used as a Title, there can only be one Pope at a time.

What I am saying is that the Orthodox Christians do not use the term Pope for their head. Now, does it matter if Catholics prefer to call there shared Partriachs Pope?

So you still haven't read my previous post?

Oya say hello to His Holiness Pope Tawadros II of the coptic Orthodox Church, bishop of the See Alexandria, Traditional Successor of St Mark the Evangelist, Bishop of Alexandria and All Africa. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Tawadros_II_of_Alexandria

donnie:
Story



Meaning, they will preach only state- approved sermons. Is that one a church?

You dont preach state approved sermons, infact d state wont tell u what to preach, but u have to be a member of a recognised religious group with permission from ur superiors to preach.

donnie:
Orthodox indeed...

END TIME: Russia has banned any form of religion soon it will be universal

Troubling times for the Church in Russia as the State tries to seal loopholes for anyone to meet Christ.

A new law has been signed this week by President Putin stating that:

1) Foreign guests are not permitted to speak in churches unless they have a "work permit" from Russian authorities

2) If a friend or relative from outside Russia wishes to share his/her faith in your home the guest will be fined and expelled from Russia.

3) Any discussion of God with non-believers is considered missionary activity and will be punishable.

this is propagada against russia, russia is actually heavily xtian with a 85% orthodox members, and the orthodox church is heavily protected by state

Anybody may preach, but the preach must be a member of a recognise group and permitted to preach.

shadeyinka:
How many Popes do you think the Orthodox Christians have. If they broke of from the Catholics then, you must share the same train of Popes up to your breakup.

How come they don't use the title Pope...could it be that the title was a recent invention?

The title pope simple means 'father', it was commonly used for priests, it was later reserved for bishops and paticulary for the apostolic sees.

By the 5th century the title was reserved for mainly two sees, the see of rome and the see of alexandra. The pope of Alexandria was excommunicated by an ecumenical council and the title was used solely for the pope of rome in the catholic church, other patriarchs have their own different titles...alexandria and rome have popes. There is still an orthodox pope in alexandria today.

shadeyinka:
The Orthodox Christians do not use the title "Pope".

If Peter was the First pope and other popes followed, then your common history before the split would have included popes in their historical links.

their history include popes, i said it b4 u seem ignorant about this topic
www.holytrinityorthodox.com/calendar/los/February/18-01.htm

1. They were ALL under the SEE of the BISHOP of ROME (NOT a Pope)

you are now sounding uneducated, the bishop of rome IS called pope, Just as d bishop of armenia is calld catholicos

2. Pope Urban was a Catholic so the use of the title Pope.

The Catholic church choose to call all the past church leaders POPE up to Peter while the ones through which you share similar history did not use that title.

the orthodox bishop of alexandria is also calld pope, he is a successor of st mark d evangelist. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Tawadros_II_of_Alexandria
Say helo to his holiness.

doyinbaby:
I don't believe some doctrines of the catholic church,,,,.But I find out that it is so difficult to convince a catholic.....you just have to let them be...
I will never support anything that can not be found from genesis to revelation

If you want to convince a catholic begin by sincerity not by lying as brocab has just done where he claims the catholic church didnt help jews during the holocaust, whereas catholic were foremost in saving jews and speaking and lobbying against d nazis.

If you avoid lying and insincerity, then any catholic will listen to you and have a friutful discussion.

Brocab, i know how you like to jump from one topic to another wherever you have been caught in a lie.

We are still taking about your claim that claim that the church didnt help jews, so please tell us
Oya name d institution that rescued
more jews than catholics, i hope u'll
name ur church.

It is good u are reading up.

shadeyinka:
In 1054, a papal delegation to the Patriarch of Constantinople excommunicated the patriarch and were in turn excommunicated by him. Though this schism was as much an issue of personal animosity and misunderstanding as anything else, the schism was never healed as the earlier schisms had been.


https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2016/07/01/exactly-divides-catholics-orthodox/

So you see the title Patriarch/Bishop was used before the schism for the head of the church.

not true, the bishop of rome had more than one title, you either call him patriarch of d west, bishop of rome, archbishop of italy, pope.... All these titles were used b4 the schism

I know of the Robes and co...my argument was about the title "Pope". If they had been using it before the breakup, they would have continued using it. And now, we would have two lines of Popes. One for the Orthodox and one for the Catholic

there is an orthodox pope.

plappville:
How do you find them? Do you think they are hiding ?

the country has intelligence agencies, They have d responsibility of apprehending terrorist and prevent terror attack.
I do not support sigmatising every muslim as terrorist.

shadeyinka:
You didn't read up the Wikipedia link

It seems you know little about orthodox, they have priestly robes, celibate bishops, archbishops and patriarchs like catholics, they believe mary is d mother of God and a whole host of other catholic doctrine abt 90%.... If you go to the church on feb 16 you'll meet them celebrate the remembrance of pope leo a catholic pope.
Infact the priest will say these exact words:

O Champion of Orthodoxy, and teacher of holiness, / The enlightenment of the universe and the inspired glory of true believers. / O most wise Father Leo, your teachings are as music of the Holy Spirit for us! / Pray thatChrist our God may save our souls!
https://oca.org/saints/troparia/2017/02/18/100553-st-leo-the-great-the-pope-of-rome

plappville:
Find who? Are you joking?

find the terrorists. i am not joking.

shadeyinka:
You didn't read up the Wikipedia link

I actually did, it seems u are ignorant of what it says.

shadeyinka:
If you are correct, then they must have their own line of Popes. But how come they dont and only the Catholics do?

The alexandrian orthodox has a line of popes too, constantinople, antioch has lines of patriarchs.

It seems u are pretty ignorant about d orthodox.

shadeyinka:
How many Popes do you think the Orthodox Christians have. If they broke of from the Catholics then, you must share the same train of Popes up to your breakup.

the orthodox actually recognise the popes until the breakup.

How come they don't use the title Pope...could it be that the title was a recent invention?

actually orthodox patriarch use the title pope... The patriarch of alexandria still uses the title. It isnt a recent invention.

easymancfc:
Oh.. So you know everything.. Please give the Part of the Catechism where the Catholic Church teaches that its followers should ADORE MARY...
please I need the Paragraph number... am curious... prove it using the Catechism which contains all Catholic teachings

Me too

italo:
Lol...i read it too. It was hilarious. They even said Pope John X was made an Archbishop when he was 5 years old, and Doctoralien believes.

If he comes across a website that says Catholic Church increased the heat of the Sun, the mumu will believe, without thinking.

Na we cause cause global warming.

analice107:
You are right. Am sorry about everything i said.

no need to apologise, anybody can make the mistake.

DoctorAlien:
I know you would not read that article, lest you be cured of your delusion.

actually, whenever i discuss with people even those who i know are lying i do due diligence. i read d article top to bottom and had a good laugh.

DoctorAlien:
Follow the link below to find an excellently articulated piece debunking the "Pope Peter" fraud. Included in that article are quotes from even the Catholic encyclopedia admitting that the early Christians didn't see Peter as Pope, and that Damasus was the first to refer to himself as "Pope".

www.excatholicsforchrist.com/articles.php?PageURL=Peter.htm

by ur reasoning It was in antioch that people where 1st called xtians, so before then, there were no Christians.