₦airaland Forum

Syncan:
White

Hahahaha, it's not yours to declare that of yourself, which priest viewed and pronounced it, because it is said thus : "then the priest shall look; and, behold, if the leprosy have covered all his flesh, he shall pronounce him clean that hath the plague: it is all turned white : he is clean". Lev.13:13


Good morning brethren, a splendid day ahead to all.

I think u got d passages mixed up, my ubenedictus bible says, 'though they be black as coal they shall be whitter than snow'. U dont nid to be decleared white.

SalC:
No rather the doctor ran back to Gureyo to be with lee min ho for life. Lol

BTW i think choi kang ta was in "A man called God" and not in Faith. That of Faith is Choi Young i think.

U too dey watch korean film?

Kalatium:
I know he won't answer your question directly

I just did.

Geist:
Is Mary's assumption biblical? Just asking. Or is that not in the catechism?

yes dear it is biblical! That is if u are open to considering all that the bible teaches.

Syncan:
Hahahaha, Ubenedictus...kettle calling pot black.

na! i don repent, i am now as white as snow.

its snow calling pot black.

Kalatium:
Catholics are Christians bro, but not everything from the catechism is biblically based.

Everything is biblical.

Kalatium:
I went and checked the website, sorry bro. The article has been removed from kdpharm.

There is another link, see it at http://www.sabbathcovenant.com/doctrine/catholic_church_admits_to_forger.htm

Please paste d quote where d church admits to forging scriptures

Kamsified:
Jeeezzzzzzzzzzzz where did u get this from?

Person no fit play with you again?

hehehe, One of syncan's hobby is harvesting interesting quotes from d bible.

Deicide:
ask the ediot who the fvck drinks juice in wedding and calls it good wine/juice we talking 2000 years ago o

U dey mind am.

gaelllic:
Yes. And so should you.

The case is incontrovertible.

Please show me where vat 2 allowed cookies for communion, these abuses happen but vat 2 didnt command or teach them.

DoctorAlien:
Serious scrutiny like changing GOD's holy Sabbath right and preventing laymen from reading the Bible, killing people who read the Bible, right?

if u open any bible of that time u will find d 7th day sabbath, d church didnt change a single word of d scripture. Even my bible has d sabbath on it, but it also has 'the lords day' and also tells me that d ordinances and commandments of d old law has been set aside.

The church didnt stop people from reading d bible, actually d church had no reason to do so, only less 5% of d population could read, there was no printing press so every bible was meticulously hand copied by monks. There were actually different edition then, abt 15 german edition which anyone who could afford can buy.

Nobody was killed for reading d bible, but unsanction incorrect translations were offense in many countries.

SisterMe:
The church didnt execute but condemned people to die. Does it matter who actually strikes the blow? It is the "authoriser" that is ultimately responsible.

D church didnt, d laws of d state did. it seems u are ignorant of these things.

SisterMe:
What passage gives the "church" the right to kill heretic? Even God did not kill Cain who was worse than a heretic - the Bible called him "the son of the evil one".

the same passage that gives isreal d right to kill an heretic, and d word of Jesus that says d deserves worst than drowning.

and as i explain b4 d church historical didnt kill heretic, d state did, and d state has the power to d so.

TechWalker007:
You are the unreasonable one here. Do you know how many petitions have been sent to EFCc concerning Amaechi and Fayemi?
How about the INEC REC that admitted to collecting bribe in Yobe but has not been charged by the govt because the bribe came from APc?
Or the 270m grass cleared in IDP. Or is it Buratai that can afford properties in Dubai worth 100yrs of his salary?

So one thieve excuses others abi? if d efcc cant prosecute d guys u dislike then no one should b prosecuted

Kalatium:
Roman Catholic Church admits that they forged history of the church and scriptures especially the book of Luke

Where did the church say that? stop lying dear.

Kalatium:
Have you read the link I gave

I have read ur link, where does it say the church forged scriptures?

the whole old testament laws and ordinances has been totally fulfilled and set aside/abolised and stripped of judical power to compel.

where did the catholic church admit to forging d bible? i stil cant find it.

MrPRevailer:
Catholics na christian before?
Many of them dont even carry bible to church neither read bible in Church. It's rosary, chaplet and Cathechism that govern them.

Purgatory, Mother of God, Queen of Heaven, Rosary prayers, image obsession are just a few characteristics of this religous myopia.

Who has that Wolf in sheep's clothing (Satan's best strategy) pic?

Why not keep shut on issues u know nothing about?

catholics read d bible in church and is a primary authoritative source for faith and moral. catechisms are just explanations and explanding upon divine truth.
Lastly all other churches came from catholic church, if catholics arent christians then neither are protestants.

Lennycool:
Hitler was a christian for most of his life, it was close to 1939 that he became a sort of deist, even at that Hitler didn't commit most of the evils himself he ordered his soldiers who were very well christians themselves. He even had the help of churches to determine who was Jewish and not, by checking their birth register. You qualify as Jewish if your ancestors were Jewish sometime before the 17th century. So though Hitler was a deist later in life his soldiers that committed the atrocities and most of the German citizenry that tolerated the evil were very largely christian. Also the Catholic church failed to speak against his persecution of the Jews, this is still a thing of great shame to the church. Also the motive behind most of the Jewish persecution was that they were the killer of Christ. So the atrocities had a very christian dimension to it.
Your post is mute

have u read mit sorge breda, the pope did speak against nazi idealism.

That is what happens when individuals translates scriptures as though it was personal property, there was a time when every translation of d bible had to undergo serious scrutiny but that changed with the protestant revolution, luther 1st translated and added 'alone' to his translation of 'the just shall live by faith' d man added and subtracted, then calvin and king james commisioned their own. Finaly we have jehova witness bible, and all other form.

Papist:
My brother how are you? I'm being off topic here. I recently saw your advice on another thread to me when I mentioned assisting at a Traditional Roman Mass of the FSSPX. I haven't by the way. Can you expand please?

i'm fine dear one,
there is no problem with d fssp the problem is in attending with d sspx, those are two different groups.

this discussion is best had on d catholic thread.

rm 2:


14 (Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15 They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also
bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them.) 16 This will take place on the day when God judges people’s secrets through Jesus Christ, as my gospel declares.

4everGod1:
Kindly do not quote me without going through this thread and takong advantage of the greek/hebrew guide I gave the link which offered a Greek/Hebrew guide to the original words interpreted as WINE in the Bible and what kind of WINE those words meant.

The argument here is not about if in those days wine was alcoholic the argument is if the one Jesus turned from water was alcoholic and the Greek translation clearly says it wad NOT.

Read and understand before you comment.

Besides the illustration using the old cloth and new patch or new wine in old wineskins was not referring to the intake of wine but wad referring to the embodiment of the Holy Spirit in an unclean old sinful vessel (man). NEW FOR NEW and not NEW FOR OLD thereby destroying the vessel (man).

I gues d one used 4 d last supper is also non alcoholic abi?

Geist:
actually wine at all times has always been an alcoholic beverage. Only in Nigeria will you find people who think there is such thing as none alcoholic wine. A peep in any dictionary will always refer to wine as an alcohol.

That is true, i am suprised to hear people talk about non alcoholic wine

macof:
smh. see why I often say you lack intelligence that you claim you will say I'm insulting.
how can yoruba adopt deities from non yoruba people when all the water deities are within Yorubaland and have different nature. migrating from where ? where are the people we adopted them from?
creeks, streams, lagoons, lakes, ocean are all different body of water..
a mark of a complete patheon by a highly thoughtful people

Suit urself. u think it is d unthoughtful that borrows gods. that show ur overated intelligence.

SisterMe:
In the gospel of Jesus Christ, He never commanded any one to kill in Jesus Name. I challenge you to show me..chapter what verse what in the new testament dispensation which we are in now (leave the old testament alone for now).

What passage says it is wrong to punish a heretic.

SisterMe:
You are not the judge of the herertic. Jesus said "it would be better..." He did not say you should become the judge. The old testament said many things that are not in force nowin the new testatment. Why should Roman Catholicism selectively pick what will allow the murder of its critics and not apply the rest of the old testament? Its hypocrisy my dear.

D church historically didnt execute heretics, that is d work of d state, d church only inquires if d person is a heretic. the execution and judgement belongs to the state. i simply showed u dat passages to show u there is biblical good precedent to condemn an heretic. if u disagree with those laws that is ur cup of tea. maybe u think d law of God is unjust.

SisterMe:
Why would God set out to defeat His own purpose by installing bad church leaders in His church? Leaders may have their personal idiosyncracies but not to the point of becoming outrightly bad people. Jesus wants His kingdom to stand. He cannot do things to defeat His own purpose. He did not die that death on the cross for nothing my dear.

I know your mindset, if you had your way, you, and I mean you Ubenedictus, would kill me and all others who oppose Roman Catholicism. Its alright. I hope you see it and repent before its too late.

God's purposes are insearchable, he allowed bad leaders in isreal, allowed false prophet to rise up in d church, he allows many things. u can question him. besides i'm pretty sure there are bad leader in ur church.

OLAADEGBU:
That still does not dispute the fact that you don't know Jack.

Nor did u dispute d assertion that neither do u.

Papist, sorry to carry this over from another thread, but i've gat to ask what exactly do u have against d catechism in d paragraph on muslims?

Are u aware that the catechism is supported by d church's magisterium and authoritative?

aborenny:
You people of dis world how long wil u judge...whn he spoke n it came 2pass ,u people said he is demon,evil fake pastor.. al such names...Now just 1of his prophecies didnt come 2pass everyone is calling him fake pastor...y dont u people call him real whn some of his prophecies came to pass...Naija....i hail oooo

Deuteronomy 18:22 New International Version If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do
not be alarmed.