₦airaland Forum

Wisdomkosi:
By Wisdom Nwedene

A young Nigerian man from Imo State has found love in the hand of a young white woman unlike others that marry old women.

The young guy by name Raphael Onyeka and his wife Victoria Prusin rocked Igbo attire during their traditional wedding.

Source : http://igberetvnews.com/450889/trending-young-nigerian-man-marries-white-woman-rocks-igbo-attirephotos/

they will end up giving birth to mulatto.

kkins25:
wrong sir.
actually in binary 1+1=10 true but not "ten" rather 1+1= one nd zero. in a counting system eg in base ten ; no number should be up to ten. the same goes for other bases. it is therefore wrong to say "1+1=ten" but 1+1=onezero.. its not subjective.

I never said it is 10th I said it is 10 . How does making 10 equal 10th. Or my symbols distract you?

Gggg102:
we already know I am talking in base 10.

even 10 in binary means 2 in decimal. the fact does not change. 1+1=2 the symbols are just symbols.

in Roman numerals, I would write I+I=II

if "we already know". Then that is axioms . Self evident base, not neccasry true. They are just an arbitrary rules that we assume to be true.

I still therefore says 1+1 is not 2 unless it is conventional. As I prove..

Gggg102:
let me use an example.

1+1=2

no amount of opinion or feeling can make 1+1=anything but 2.

false ....in binary, 1+1=10.

In philosophy, you will have to go a long way ,like What is "1"? What is "+"? What is "2"?… if “1” is stands for a single object and "+” action is takes both sides, add them and dived by 2 (for normalization) and we will keep the original mining of “=” and “2” will be 2 objects.
Then, 1+1=2 is a false statement. Therefore logically we can arrive that 1+1 is not 2 unless in a conventional settings where will want to work with agree axioms( you call it opinion in your earlier definition ) I assume.

Gggg102:
when a statement is consistent, unmovable by human opinion, it is objective.

emphasis on the opinion . opinion is not necessarily base on fact or knowledge......anyway am ok with your definition but need a bit adjustment.

Can: Yes. The physiology is there and works.

Want to: Seldom. Psychic factors are usually in place to prevent that from happening as it is bad for the gene pool.

Should: No. It is bad for the gene pool. And there will usually be an unbalanced relation with coercion and dominance as a part of the incest. And likewise it is traditionally forbidden in Africa or any part of the world, in fact, if it was in the olden days the two culprit will be stoned to death or barnished from the town entirely.

Pavore9:
Incest is more rampant than being reported.

You are very right, just like other negativity.....

allanphash7:
No sir



I'm just invited for the program

ooh......i see. Ok enjoy your holiday

TechCapon:
[color=magenta]TechCapon[/color]

https://techcapon.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/suitx-standing-2.jpg

This exoskeleton called SuitX is designed to make you 10 times stronger and make you feel like iron man. These exoskeletons are designed to enhance your strength and help prevent injuries when performing repetitive tasks and can make you carry heavy objects which you normally cannot be able to carry. Apart from that, this suitX will be able to make people who are permanently confine to wheel chairs as a result of spinal cord injuries to be able to work again.

https://techcapon.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/download-1.jpg

The exoskeleton suitX is developed by a group of university students and developed for adults and children with neurological disorders that affect their gait, such as spinal cord injuries, stroke, traumatic brain injuries, and cerebral palsy. The SuitX is made up of three different components named after the parts of your body they’re protecting: the BackX; the LegX to make it easier to hold a crouched position; and the ShoulderX to reduce strain when working above your head. With the LegX, you can squat for hours without feeling any strain in your legs or knees. It’s like having your own personal chair that goes with you everywhere.

https://techcapon.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/exo.jpg
https://techcapon.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/exxx-768x410.jpg

According to a lady who wore the exoskeleton, she said “I feel superhuman. I just lifted a 50 pound box like it weighed almost nothing — no gym time required. I’m wearing an exoskeleton by SuitX that’s supporting my back, using a clever system of springs and clutches to give me a boost”. The suitX can replace the wheel chair in the nearest future if the developers succeed in making it accessible for everyone while making it cheaper and affordable.

WATCH VIDEO HERE

SOURCE:http://techcapon.com/this-exoskeleton-is-designer-to-make-you-10-times-stronger/

Just like seismic underwear. I believe both we be cheaper in the nearest future. When mobile phone was first developed , it can only be accessed by rich individual but now, almost everyone can afford it.

However. I think we should be careful with this kind of technology, creating technologies that will only create deeper gulfs in an already divided society where only some people will be able to afford to become enhanced while many other lose out is dangerous for now.

History is littered with the evil consequences of one group of humans believing they are superior to another group of humans,”“Unfortunately in the case of enhanced humans they will be genuinely superior. We need to think. People who can afford this object will be more superior. And it will be geniue.


There is this computerized eye glass too that can make blind people see. Yet to be fully roll out. I was surprised when watching the documentary......

Fitbillionairep:
i noticed that fat people are stronger than muscular pipu.

some fat people have a stronger bone with adequate bone mass.

thoniann:
It can never be like Christmas.... Never!

it depends on the state or town ....to state like kwara, kano town and some majorly Islamic stronghold. It by far outweigh Christmas

allanphash7:
Ileya after isese day



Chai



After i finish with pork and dog on monday then ram loading on tuesday and Wednesday



I love this year festive period gan

Are you from osun state? Osogbo in particular.

Traditions are great, but we must distinguish between ripe traditions that are good to eat and rotten traditions that should be discarded.

In IFA Spirituality, there is a pataki (sacred oral story) that tells of parents who both grew up in the same farming village in the dawn of human existence. They both learned how to grow plentiful food. They grew so much food that they had more than they could eat for months before the food spoiled. Being that they lived at the dawn of human history before we learned from trial and error, the parents did not understand the concept of spoiled food. In their mind, all grown food was good. They then fed their children the spoiled food. Their children ended up very sick and nearly died if it wasn't for Obba and Oko coming to save them. Obba asked them why did they do it; the parents said that food is good. Oko explained that farming food is good, but all things tarnish. When food is tarnished, it can cause sickness if eaten.

In your quest to reclaim your ancestral spiritual powers, be careful to only pick the ripe harvest and avoid that which has become spoiled and rotten.

During the slave raids, many aspects of Yoruba culture became rotted food. Realizing this, the vast majority of Yoruba threw out all of their culture/food. They are now powerless and depend on the food of Eurasian culture. They (and most of the Black race) reduced themselves to being starving beggars at the table of Islam and Christianity.

What the Yoruba should have done is discard what was spoiled in their culture and preserved what was ripe and fresh and use that to grow new fields of indigenous Yoruba spirituality.



From "isese""

may the wisdom( ORUNMILA) bestowed upon us by olodumare in us be our watch guide...

Traditions are great, but we must distinguish between ripe traditions that are good to eat and rotten traditions that should be discarded.

In IFA Spirituality, there is a pataki (sacred oral story) that tells of parents who both grew up in the same farming village in the dawn of human existence. They both learned how to grow plentiful food. They grew so much food that they had more than they could eat for months before the food spoiled. Being that they lived at the dawn of human history before we learned from trial and error, the parents did not understand the concept of spoiled food. In their mind, all grown food was good. They then fed their children the spoiled food. Their children ended up very sick and nearly died if it wasn't for Obba and Oko coming to save them. Obba asked them why did they do it; the parents said that food is good. Oko explained that farming food is good, but all things tarnish. When food is tarnished, it can cause sickness if eaten.

In your quest to reclaim your ancestral spiritual powers, be careful to only pick the ripe harvest and avoid that which has become spoiled and rotten.

During the slave raids, many aspects of Yoruba culture became rotted food. Realizing this, the vast majority of Yoruba threw out all of their culture/food. They are now powerless and depend on the food of Eurasian culture. They (and most of the Black race) reduced themselves to being starving beggars at the table of Islam and Christianity.

What the Yoruba should have done is discard what was spoiled in their culture and preserved what was ripe and fresh and use that to grow new fields of indigenous Yoruba spirituality.

gimmehear:
100level OAU student stoned friend to near death.
A female student from Obafemi Awolowo university was arrested yesterday for for almost killing a friend of hers.
Unidentified Foreign student of the OAU has been arrested by the police of stoning her Friend, a Nigerian schooling also in the same school. The stoning occurred as a result of Nifemi advising Tope to stop her smoking habit.
OAU, suspect
This incidence happens at their apartment along Ede Road, Ile Ife, Osun state. It was gathered that the serious argument that surfaces between the both parties was as a result olie Nifemi advising the Tope who is now been treated as a suspect in the police to stop smoking.

The argument took the wrong turn, Tope took stone and aimed it at Nifemi’s head.

Suspect on the left, victim on the right

http://gimmehear.com/100l-oau-student-stoned-friend-near-death/

Tope a foreign student.... I smell lies.

Born2Breed:
How much do you think traditional rulers are paid?

they are payed on percentage and commission. They also get salary ....it is called royal dues. It is not permanent. Sometime,it can be more or less. It depends on the state cover. But in actuality, they are well payed.

lilmax:
what a waste of money.... what exactly is the work of an oba?

They are professional celebrities “employed” by the government, Their pay comes from a combination of money direct from the government, and inherited wealth that has not been reduced by taxation(oba no dey pay tax)just like that of the traditional aristocracy. The work by doing the same things all celebrities do: giving a structure to an occasion by their arrival, participation (in a rather stilted way) and departure.


WHEN YOU ARE BORN INTO ROYALTY, THE MONEY IS IN YOUR DNA. KINGS don't hassle for money nor do they do any direct paying job.

LoJ:
Good topic.

@Vaxx budaatum and others

Did you consider the possibility that organisation use your organs to carry out research, but very negative ones?

I understand the idea is to contribute to the betterment of humanity. Still, All of research is not necessarily positive. It is proven and known that there exists organisation's which under a facade of positive minded research actual work with perverse motives. What if your body organs are used in such a venture?

Thanks for the compliment.

In regards to the question ..it contains an assumption... Well, Negative results itself are not disastrous for scientist community , so long as knowledge is gain. But coming to humanity at large .... ethics will become a considerable factor, regarding the country where the research take place. For example in Europe, there is ethical body that gave instruction on how science should be conducted. ""European Codes Eight Principles”. It mostly relates to doing science in a way that is reliable, and not influenced by special interests.

Yes some still go out of the lay down principle to conduct their own research which is opposite to the ethics code. They are the black sheep in the community of the saint. Not quite long, I watch an horror movie called belko experiment. The film illustrate how death trap was set on company staffs just to know how they feels emotionally to loose a co worker and how people panic at the point of death. This are the negative example I can relate to, assuming it is real.

There should be an agreement between the donor and the organisation taking the dead body after the donor dismiss. The body shall be use solely for conducting "" positive sciencetific research""(I,e)in accordance with the ethical organisation that is regulated by law. the donor next of kin should have a copy in case it goes otherwise.

Second, is there any consideration for the after death experience. Could it be that some Form of burial/ disposal of corpse could be advantageous for the after death journey or detrimental to it?

in some part of Africa, some dead body are buried while sitting . To the best of my knowledge, it only happens to royal family among them and it denote a form of respect and royal blood which will be given to the victim in the here after.Likewise some tribe in India burn their wife alongside her dead husband to show loyalty and good wife .hoping the marriage will continue in the here after.( This practise had stoped now) Egyptians also mummify the kings in the hope of attaining royalty in the here after. The body should not be rotten as it will still be needed in the here after.

To some people, there are hopes after death and it is well consider when considering how their dead should be desposed.

Luukasz:
Sango worshipers say sango is the way.
Every religion of the world is the work of men.

God gave us reason. Not religion .

where and how did the Sango worshiper says this?

Are you sure your position as a deist is not base on the twin flaws of being unable to wholly let go of the cultural superstitions of the past on the one hand and an over reliance on fundamental “argument from incredulity” or “argument from ignorance” fallacies. Which make your position similar to that of a religion fundamentalist.

Lol

ScienceWatch:
You are most welcome to join us. I passed your message on to them and got a good response. I was told to tell you that your favorite Tilapia will be sourced especially for you with Sun ripe Tomatoes to ensure your comfort.
What pepper do you use with Tilapia ?

wahoo. Am honoured. Bell pepper to be precise. I will like it garnish with lot of orgarnic vegetable.

Mulatto

ScienceWatch:
No sir, Sorjry to disappoint you, but I have very simple tastes, My favorite fish is ordinary gill free Hake roasted on an open fire with four good friends to share it with. To stay true to my simple minimalistic life style, I would spice the roasted Hake with generous amounts of Sea Salt and fresh hand ground pepper.
I really must courier you a large piece to enjoy.

Whaooo...then I must be part of those four friends o. I really love tilapia a lot though is full of bones....i also love it roasted with much pepper and enough tomato

ScienceWatch:
My humble apologies sir.

Apology accepted

ScienceWatch:
Not entirely. No I would never stoop so low sir. The topic heading is "What is Atheism." I notice that my approach makes atheists nervous because it touches the rotten root of the atheists dilemma. My question now is simple and relevant because I am giving atheists a grand opportunity to redeem themselves in front of the Christians and Muslims they have unceasingly mocked and insulted.

I call on all mocking atheists to PROVE beyond reasonable doubts the year by year events off the periods marked with hash tags below.
Let me remind atheists that Richard Dawkins indoctrinates atheists with a fishy story.

4.6 billion years ago -The origin of the Earth
3.8 billion years ago - First life arises
2.1 billion years ago - Eukaryotes evolved
# # # 1.1 billion years ago - First sexually reproducing organisms
570 million years agoFirst arthropods evolve
# # # 530 mill[b]ion years ago - The first fish [/b]

Lol

ScienceWatch:
Thank you for your kind response sir. If you find time in your busy day, please let me have the link to your post on Science Atheists.
About apes being our nearest cousin. I like to spend my holidays in Nature reserves. I always enjoy watching those apes but I never knew that they were my nearest cousins.

The problem I am having after you shared this secret with me is that I have pay huge sums of money to enter my cousins property (Nature Reserve). I admire my cousins while there, but they wont do the same for me. Could it be that they are the more evolved ones mocking me the same way Buddaatum does ?

stop making me laugh............lol. I am cracking my stomach.

ScienceWatch:
Thanks sir. The complainant appears to be the nervous type when in a rough robust environment.
I really have nothing personal against that fish. How can I be when fish is my favorite meal.

lol....Tilapia or salmon . Which one is your favourite.

ScienceWatch:
With all due respect to you Vaxx, I strongly reject pseudo scientific views on evolution. I have openly stated many times and everywhere that;
ONLY A CLONED MONKEY WILL BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION.

I have no problem with those that believe, but they should be aware that many corrupt scientists have colluded to destroy humanity's believe in a creator God in the same way atheists do.
How does half-baked scientific theories on evolution benefit humanity ?

Atheists ask Christians for evidence of God. All I ssk for is evidence of a day by day account of only one period listed below ;

I assume atheists must know a lot about the period marked below with hash tags.
Richard Dawkins indoctrinates atheists with a fishy story. Lol
4.6 billion years agoThe origin of the Earth
3.8 billion years agoFirst life arises
2.1 billion years agoEukaryotes evolved
1.1 billion years agoFirst sexually reproducing organisms
570 million years agoFirst arthropods evolve
# # # 530 million years agoThe first fish
475 million years agoFirst land plants
385 million years agoFirst forests
370 million years agoThe first amphibians
320 million years agoThe earliest reptiles
225 million years agoThe dinosaurs evolve
200 million years agoThe mammals evolve
150 million years agoFirst birds
130 million years agoFlowering plants evolve
100 million years agoThe first bees evolve
65 million years agoDinosaurs and ammonites become extinct
14 million years agoThe first great apes appear
2.5 million years agoGenus Homo evolves
200 thousand years agoOur species, Homo sapiens evolves
10 thousand years agoEnd of the last Ice Age

ok , so you reject evolution evidence base on the year difference right?


BUT in advance, we are not apes nor monkey. We only share simil6arities with them. They are our nearest cousin. However, I am interested in the first question.

Athiest are not necessary scientist. They are simply unbeliever in the existence of God. Though I agree some athiest hide under science to justify their position. I called them science atheist.....

I have a thread on it. You can go ahead and read it.

budaatum:
I wouldn't say I've met a single one on here. Point them out so I can personally educate them please!

you should know it is not in my habbit calling names. I rather give sample.

But if I must do so because of this topic. I will rather wish you write to this two very anti- Darwin. They both wrote a book name “What Darwin got wrong” by Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Malmarini, the two dude both claim they are “card-carrying atheists”. A Google search should tell you much.

Another famous atheist philosopher named ""Thomas Nagel"" examined the logic (or lack thereof) within Darwinian evolution and physicalism in general. His book is called “Mind & Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False”.

Your rebuttal to this extreme mention individual will serve the society better than the atheist here on nairaland. With all due respect. I actually do not think all the so called ":athiest " on nairaland have duely convince themselves enough. Maybe some stands out anyway.

budaatum:
Not accepting evolution even has negative consequences. No nation of people can develop if they wish to continue to live in the past and refuse to evolve their knowledge and understanding. It is why I am an enemy of "beliefs". It creates unevolved apes out of people.

only a fundamentalist will reject evolution.. A close minded individual. It might sound funny, but not all athiest are satisfy with evolution theory too.

budaatum:
That's one trick most Christians seem to miss. If I were one of them, it wouldn't matter to me that evolutionists claim humans and apes share common ancestry because I'd claim God evolved Adam and Eve, their common ancestor, from mud, which predates apes. So there!

To deny evolution however, requires a high level of ignorance, or the denial of avaliable evidence.

evolution is a self evident. Anybody can study it via nature. In fact, It take an elementary knowledge of science to understand it and quite logical too.So rejecting it in the presence of verifiable evidence is an act of ignorance or the religious guy just want to be uncceasrry arrogant.. " fundamentalist "

These are two quotes from the highest authority in Catholic church regarding evolution and big bang


""God created beings and allowed them to develop according to the internal laws that he gave to each one, so that they were able to develop and to arrive and their fullness of being. He gave autonomy to the beings of the universe at the same time at which he assured them of his continuous presence, giving being to every reality. And so creation continued for centuries and centuries, millennia and millennia, until it became which we know today, precisely because God is not a demiurge or a magician, but the creator who gives being to all things... The Big Bang, which nowadays is posited as the origin of the world, does not contradict the divine act of creating, but rather requires it. The evolution of nature does not contrast with the notion of creation, as evolution presupposes the creation of beings that evolve""

Pope Francis

Take a look at few important things in that little quote - in particular, you will see the fact that the Pope clearly states that the world we live in has existed for a rather long time, leading back all the way to the Big Bang - and even that does not contradict the teachings of the Catholic Church. This in start contrast to the claims of some who take the literal interpretation of the timelines in the bible to heart.

Another interesting quote:

"Currently, I see in Germany, but also in the United States, a somewhat fierce debate raging between so-called "creationism" and evolutionism, presented as though they were mutually exclusive alternatives: those who believe in the Creator would not be able to conceive of evolution, and those who instead support evolution would have to exclude God. This antithesis is absurd because, on the one hand, there are so many scientific proofs in favour of evolution which appears to be a reality we can see and which enriches our knowledge of life and being as such. But on the other, the doctrine of evolution does not answer every query, especially the great philosophical question: where does everything come from? And how did everything start which ultimately led to man? I believe this is of the utmost importance""

Pope Benedict XVI


I also read it from somewhere that archbishop of canterbury is a big time supporter of evolution.

As for Islam, evolution theory seems to be well accepted more than the christain society. Hardly do Muslim debate over it. Apart from the fundamentalist among them.

budaatum:
You should have said that when he came around trashiwillng every opinion expressed on the thread. You did tell those who did before him, so why didn't you tell him?

Stop linking me with that ape!

opinion rejected.

Once you guys settle. Frank317 and tithngs has no issue. They are just cashing fun................,...........