Christianity Etc › Re: Happy Birthday Pastor Chris Oyakhilome ! by Zikkyy(m): 7:22am On Dec 12, 2011 |
Joagbaje: Well the Delta governor Said many things, and one of the things we touched me personally was when he narrated how he travelled to lagos to see pastor CHRIS during some election crisis. He said the thing pastor Chris asked him was. "WHAT WILL YOU DO FOR YOUR PEOPLE." . By that making him to understand that the point of contact for success in such situation is determination to deliver result .He said when he came into that birthday dinner , the first thing pastor Chris asked him again was the same question."WHAT ARE YOU DOING FOR YOUR PEOPLE?" The people of Delta state (& other well-wishers) have been asking same questions for five years, and you were not 'touched'  The thing only 'touched' you after Oyaks ask a question everybody been asking for over five years abi? Man worshiper  |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Salvation By Faith Without Works--femi Aribisala by Zikkyy(m): 8:37am On Dec 09, 2011 |
aletheia: I would have agreed with this statement except for the portions in bold. Seems like splitting hairs, I know, but it leaves enough wiggle room for one to argue that works do save. LOL  haba, which one you dey na? you know my stand on the matter na. i am not one to shift ground just to get out of a difficult situation. If it turns out am wrong, i'll admit am wrong. Zikkyy: Are we saved by just doing the work bit? i will say No, but you cannot have a work-less faith. And that's why i'll say faith and works are inseparable. aletheia: Remember that you have not really given a satisfactory answer to the issue of the thief on the cross because his faith did not produce any visible work that we could see The problem we are having here is that you've taken a position on my behalf; that one must work to be saved. But that's not what i've been saying. and i think you've already answered the question. let see. . . . . aletheia: The way I understand the relationship between faith and works is as follows: 1. Only by faith are we saved (Eph 2:8-9). This is like telling half the story. On its own it could be considered a misleading statement as some people will stop here. Thankfully, you did not. aletheia: 2. If our faith is real. . .then it will produce good works Thank you sir  and if i consolidate i & 2, i'll have something like this; Only by (genuine/real) faith that produces good works are we saved So i don't see how this nullify the statement that "there is no salvation by faith without works" (that assuming the person was not already nailed to the cross  ) aletheia: 3. Only God knows what constitutes real faith. . .and thus what is good works. Chikenna! So we can re-visit the case of the chap on the cross (and my comment that God does need not to see my work for my salvation). He is not required to come down from the cross and perform any addition work for him to be saved. he has done the bit required for that situation, and God has seen the nature of his faith. aletheia: 3. Only the works of real or genuine faith can be regarded as good works. Don't know where you are going with this, so i have to ignore  aletheia: 4. Some works that appear to be good works to us are not. . .because the faith is false. Thanks God for this. So you see the danger in saying "only by faith are we saved". Included in that statement is both the genuine and 'false' faith I hope i have answered your question  |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Salvation By Faith Without Works--femi Aribisala by Zikkyy(m): 10:13pm On Dec 08, 2011 |
You are so bent on dragging me into this salvation/work argument  aletheia: It may be I am too rigid in my understanding of faith.  I think you are too rigid. Honestly i believe to a significant extent everybody is saying the same thing. One difference i observed is your view that the Christian can do no wrong, he is operating on autopilot/programmed mode (as set by the God). The apostles were not writing what you called exhortations, reminders e.t.c to brethren on auto pilot. aletheia: Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, [size=14pt]not according to our works[/size], but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began, [2Ti 1:9] aletheia: Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; [Titus 3:5] These posts are not relevant for the faith/work discussion, you don't need them. If calling is based on works, Saul/Paul will be the last to be called. I don't know of anybody that believes we are saved by works. I've seen peeps argue two positions: 1. Saved by faith + work 2. Saved by faith only To address my main concern, i'll need you to interpret the scriptures you are posting here. It's not self explanatory. aletheia: These verses do suggest predestination by God in eternity past; how God works it out in time is beyond me. . .  Yes they do suggest predestination, but am happy you did not attempt to interpret. |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Salvation By Faith Without Works--femi Aribisala by Zikkyy(m): 7:23am On Dec 08, 2011 |
Pastor AIO: So conclusion: Works do not save, but works are a sign of salvation. Therefore if you don't do works, then you cannot be saved. The works will no save you but it will allow us to know whether or not you are saved. Correct. Work (without faith) will not save you, and you cannot be saved if your faith does not produce works  aletheia: Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, Make you perfect in every good work to do his will, working in you that which is wellpleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ; to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen. Heb 13:20-21. This does not address my concern. but no wahala, it's accepted. Thanks for your time. |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Salvation By Faith Without Works--femi Aribisala by Zikkyy(m): 4:04pm On Dec 07, 2011 |
aletheia: Second, [size=14pt]if they abandon the work[/size], then it probably [size=14pt]an indication that they were not saved to begin with[/size]. (By their fruits you shall know them). That one is part of the crowd that calls itself Christian does not mean they are. It’s also an indication that you have agreed (with italo) that no work = no salvation  You have said it yourself that the man refusing the work is possible proof he cannot be saved. I guess the logic here is that we can't claim to have faith and not be able to show it in our works. Are we saved by just doing the work bit? i will say No, but you cannot have a work-less faith. And that's why i'll say faith and works are inseparable. I think it very safe to say there is no salvation by faith without works. My main concern here is not actually the work bit but on your claim that people don't play any role in their salvation. aletheia: That one is part of the crowd that calls itself Christian does not mean they are. Thank you jare. I agree with you 100% aletheia: I fail to see the conflict.  It's not likely you will. cos you are the one making the post and zikkyy doing the reading. The reason viewers can analyse a game better than the players on the pitch  aletheia: The thief's request was an acknowledgement of Jesus as Lord, a working out of his faith in Jesus As you can see, it's difficult for you to talk about faith without mentioning 'works' But back to my main concern, you said the thief request was an acknowledgement of Jesus as Lord; This 'acknowledgement', was it based on 'orders from above'? (meaning the thief has no say in the matter and was only complying with a directive from above) or was it based on the thief's sincere reflection of his life or the situation and decided to make the request? aletheia: . .do you realize both thieves asked Jesus to save them?! Why was only one saved? Look again at the passage.  Luke 23:39 (NIV) 39 One of the criminals who hung there hurled insults at him: “Aren’t you the Messiah? Save yourself and us!”The comment from the second thief does not sound like he truly wish to be saved  aletheia: And doesn't this precisely show that no additional work is needed beyond Jesus Christ's blood for the salvation of souls? If the thief did no work and yet was saved. . .what does that tell us? No it doesn’t. But it tells me that God do not need to see my work for my salvation. I’ve been trying to avoid the discussion on works and faith cos I believe you guys have been saying the same thing, probably in different languages. The thing is you can’t have ‘genuine faith’ and not have works, they are inseparable (this you are aware of). aletheia: If you believe that God knows all; why balk at the fact that from the beginning, God knew those who will have been saved at the last, and knowing this made provision for them to be saved. I can agree that God knew those who will have been saved at the last, but were those saved handpicked by God himself? based on some random sampling? |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Salvation By Faith Without Works--femi Aribisala by Zikkyy(m): 4:03pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
aletheia: We often find this confusing because we do not gaze upward beyond ourselves to Christ Jesus. Too often we stop at Philippians 2:12. . . aletheia: . . .without proceeding on to Philippians 2:13 Well. . em. . . you forgot to add Philippians 2:14 14Do all things without murmurings and disputings:  As you can see they can decide to abandon the work. But seriously, i wasn't thinking Philippians when i made the initial post. I was just responding to what i read you say. Your post sometimes appears to conflict with the message you're sending. aletheia: . . .but did the thief on the cross really present himself? Did he play a role in his salvation? Yes he did, he made a request that Jesus should remember him when he (Jesus) get to his kingdom or was it the Holy Spirit talking? aletheia: The thief died that day on the cross. He had no further opportunity after a lifetime of depravity to do good works. . .and yet he was saved. How do you expect a man nailed to the cross to do any additional work. aletheia: The reason (in my opinion) we think we have a role to play is because we are clouded by traditions concerning the nature of the gospel of Jesus. We have fallen prey to decisionism. My understanding of your posts is that some people were pre-destined to go to heaven and others to hell. So i wonder why the apostles needed to preach the good news, or was that process a formality as well? |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Salvation By Faith Without Works--femi Aribisala by Zikkyy(m): 8:43am On Dec 06, 2011 |
aletheia: When we truthfully examine ourselves, can we say in all conscience that we have loved the Lord God with all our heart, and with all our soul, and with all our mind, and with all our strength. There have been times when our minds wandered, our hearts faltered and our strength waned (including today). . .at such times weren't we in transgression of this command. And being in transgression of this command everyday of our lives (because our love for God is not perfect), what can save us except the atoning blood of Jesus? I very much understand this. Thank you. aletheia: Not robots. Christians are saved.  can't blame me for that. i was just responding to what i read you say. aletheia: Still using the illustration of the child. He is dressed in a clean white robe which has already been washed spotless. He puts it on and goes out into the daily grind amidst admonitions to keep it unsoiled (what we see in scriptures). The truth is that the child's best efforts (his works) cannot keep the robe clean, rather only the One who cleaned it can keep it spotless. Okay. aletheia: When a child is born. . .the neural pathways that will enable him to walk and run are present, but it needs to learn how to walk and run from the examples of others around him. Barring any untoward incident, the child will walk. This is the bit i don't understand. What i read you say here is that the child still need to make an effort to walk. It means we do have a say in the process. aletheia: What is written in James etc are exhortations, reminders, examples for Christians to see and learn from. . .which is why the word "grow" occurs in the Bible. exhortations, reminders. All point to the need for a christian to put in his bit. aletheia: It is the walk in holiness that is characterized as works. . .but we know that this only arises because he has been made holy. Would have loved some clarifications here, but don't want to take too much of your time. aletheia: It is God's sovereign choice. Just as you did not decide for your parents that you should be born; I understand (and agree with) the sovereign choice bit, but. . . . . . aletheia: It is God's sovereign choice. Just as you did not decide for your parents that you should be born; [size=14pt]even so we have no input into being born from above.[/size] Or how do you read John 1:13. If it says born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.. . .[size=14pt]what then can be our role in the process?[/size] We do have a role in the process, we present ourselves. or what do you have to say about crook that was converted on the cross? Edit: aletheia: that's how it is with the Christian. He has been transformed. Dying in Christ and being born anew with a new, divine and holy nature. You painting a beautiful picture  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Salvation Vs. Assurance Of Salvation by Zikkyy(m): 7:38am On Dec 06, 2011 |
OLAADEGBU: Can you be more specific on what your objections are? I don't have objections (yet), just want to understand what your intentions are. i.e. what you want to achieve with the post. |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Salvation By Faith Without Works--femi Aribisala by Zikkyy(m): 4:21pm On Dec 05, 2011 |
aletheia: Genuine faith comes from God as a gift. It cannot be willed into existence by men. So what is our role in the process? How then do we get to the state/stage that makes us eligible for this gift? this implies that we should not be held responsible for our actions if we don't have a say in the process. aletheia: The bearing of [size=14pt]good[/size] fruit (representing works) is hard-coded into the [size=14pt]good[/size] seed's DNA. The seed therefore has no choice but has a genetic imperative to bear [size=14pt]good[/size] fruit. This assumes that Christians are designed to function like robots. So what about the people being addressed in the James letter? If the ability for good works have been hard-coded into their DNA, then there won't be need for James writings. |
Christianity Etc › Re: *~ Joagbaje Voted The Religion Section Poster Of The Year *~ Congratulations!!! by Zikkyy(m): 3:25pm On Dec 05, 2011 |
Joagbaje: It will only be deserted by the abusive agberos posters . They will either change or be [size=5pt]Banned[/size] but more responsible posters will emerge world wide, and this section will be a world class resource Center. LOL  this na your manifesto abi  you forget NL is still a business, and does not depend on tithe and offerings  Joagbaje: maybe if o Some of us are allowed to donate towards that. especially if I become moderator. typical nigerian politician  attempting to buy your way abi  |
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Salvation By Faith Without Works--femi Aribisala by Zikkyy(m): 1:45pm On Dec 05, 2011 |
aletheia: And what is faith? Do you understand faith to be mere assent of the Lordship of Christ? It is not. If you have genuine faith. . .then the God-ordained works of righteousness will follow. You made a distinction between 'genuine faith' and other type of 'faith' here. I hope you don't mind my asking, what makes a faith genuine? I am just trying to understand how it links up with the second bit of the post (i.e. " then the God-ordained works of righteousness will follow"  . |
Christianity Etc › Re: Salvation Vs. Assurance Of Salvation by Zikkyy(m): 8:17am On Dec 05, 2011 |
OLAADEGBU: Thus, we can not only have salvation, but also assurance of salvation if we love and guard His Word, seek to keep His commandments, and love all others of like precious faith. Finally we have the indwelling witness of the Spirit. "Hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us" (1 John 3:24). HMM What exactly are you preaching  |
Christianity Etc › Re: *~ Joagbaje Voted The Religion Section Poster Of The Year *~ Congratulations!!! by Zikkyy(m): 7:46am On Dec 05, 2011 |
I nominate frosbel Joagbaje: Some of us are allowed to donate towards that. especially if I become moderator. that can only happen in your dreams  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Dr. Sign Fireman: Man Of God Or Man Of Money? (Video Documentary) by Zikkyy(m): 12:59pm On Dec 01, 2011 |
dare2think: A company that sells air crafts without a name. LOL  maybe he was referring to toy aeroplanes. probably a shop at oshodi  Joagbaje: Why not find out , at least from his members here. if the info was available, they would have posted it. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Justified—by Faith Or Works? by Zikkyy(m): 3:40pm On Nov 30, 2011 |
OLAADEGBU: True saving faith inevitably will manifest itself in works of righteousness. This is the 'koko' of the faith/works issue. Faith and works are inseparable. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Dr. Sign Fireman: Man Of God Or Man Of Money? (Video Documentary) by Zikkyy(m): 2:42pm On Nov 30, 2011 |
firegirl: hello pals i am firegirl not taskgirl Are you related to fireman  firegirl: A guy was a drunkard, he went to drink with his friends, he slept off and they left him, he heard peolple singing praises wen he woke up, he joined and on the following sunday,he came to church and Daddy asked people who were interested to make it BIG should come out for a seed of 1k(one thousand naira), he didnt have a dim, he borrowed from some1 he happen to know and he sowed the seed, that week he was favoured wit 30k, he came back the following sunday and sowed a seed of 10k after pating his tithe, that same week he was favoured with 300k, he came back and gave a testimony and sowed a seed of 100k and that week he was given a contract 10million, he came back again and sowed a seed, the following week he got 3 international contracts worth 54billion, We'll take this testimony again; when the guy is sober  |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Truth Your Pastor Would Not Tell You About Tithes: Tithing Is Unscriptural U by Zikkyy(m): 9:00am On Nov 29, 2011 |
garyarnold: 7 - The crime is so carefully crafted and executed that most church goers will yell AMEN! LOL  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Dr. Sign Fireman: Man Of God Or Man Of Money? (Video Documentary) by Zikkyy(m): 8:12am On Nov 29, 2011 |
taskgirl: Seven, we know that Jesus was rich because of the kind of clothes He wore! He wore “designers”! “Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also his coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout” (John 19:23). John 19:23-24 (KJV) 23Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also his coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout.
24They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: [size=14pt]that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did.[/size] |
Christianity Etc › Re: Nigeria's Millionaire Preachers [Documentary] - To Be Shown Tonight by Zikkyy(m): 10:26am On Nov 23, 2011 |
Joagbaje: The only reason he would not have countered it is that it's true. Sagamite: You must be dumbed to conclude: since it was not challenged then it must be true. That is a cretinous deduction. LOL  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Christ Embassy Fraudulent? by Zikkyy(m): 5:44pm On Nov 22, 2011 |
newmi: l thought to myself is it possible that l am being deceived? Is there a chance to suggest that l am being or have been brain washed?
Hmmmmmm but again l reason and consider isn't the word of God there for all to see and understand There's no way you'll know If you've been brainwashed  you would have lost the ability to reason  |
Christianity Etc › Re: I Believe Pastor Chris Should Be Respected by Zikkyy(m): 12:01pm On Nov 07, 2011 |
Pastor Kun: It is quite evident you created this. Thread to spark controversy knowing fully well in your heart of heart that pastor chris is fraudulent character with no morals or regard for God hence he deserves no respect. True talk. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Walk In Love by Zikkyy(m): 3:21pm On Oct 24, 2011 |
Joagbaje: That means you have the ability to love like God, but you have to make a choice to walk in love, for love is a choice – you choose to love!
God doesn’t make you love someone; He’s already put His love in your spirit and now it’s up to you to let it out. Learn to relate with people from God’s perspective. See them the way God sees them, and that’s the right way to live. If you walk in love, you won’t steal, slander or malign anyone. . . . . . and a pastor that walk in love will not 'milk' his/her congregation. I agree with Anita on this one. This is a 'must read' for pastors  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Does God Require Tithes? by Zikkyy(m): 3:00pm On Oct 24, 2011 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Does God Require Tithes? by Zikkyy(m): 1:44pm On Oct 24, 2011 |
wordtalk: In just the same way, you can derive your answer to your question posed earlier. I am having problem with this, kindly assist  wordtalk: Let me elaborate. The guy is often borrowing from the very people he has been preaching his anti-tithing arguments to. With all his "freewill offerings" (sorry, 'love-driven' so-and-so), he is reduced to begging borrowing. Worse yet, he has three kids to feed daily. . . and his favourite text of the NT? Luke 6:35 - "give LEND, hoping for nothing again" - he claims it is his Christian right to ask others to give LEND him whatever he needs and expect nothing in return. What are you saying? is the chap a giver or a receiver? If he is a receiver, maybe he is not receiving enough, that's why he is broke  He needs to work on his begging skillz. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Does God Require Tithes? by Zikkyy(m): 1:34pm On Oct 24, 2011 |
wordtalk: Did I assert anywhere that anyone's act of love should be 'dependent' on any rewards? What I tried to say was that giving is taught as reciprocal in both the OT and NT. 'Reciprocal' does not run contrary to acts driven by love. wordtalk: Did I argue anywhere that we give only when there is reward? Did I? If I did not, what is bringing you to such a conclusion? Extract from your posts Quote from: wordtalk "On the contrary, the form of giving that is 'love-driven' also includes aspects where the giver indeed expects to receive something in return.""Believers can indeed give and EXPECT to receive."If my understanding of the above quote is wrong, then my apologies. Maybe you can clarify. wordtalk: People give not because they must first attach a reward - whatever such would be. You say this only because you don't know my people. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Does God Require Tithes? by Zikkyy(m): 1:19pm On Oct 24, 2011 |
wordtalk: I also know of another anti-tither who tried all his best to stop others from giving. In all his arguments about 'love-driven giving', he remains broke today. Could I also ask you: how come his anti-tithing arguments and rule did not better his life? LOL  You want to know why his anti-tithing activities did not better his life? it's because his anti-tithing arguments (& love driven giving) is not a 'get rich scheme'. it's not a money making venture, that's why  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Does God Require Tithes? by Zikkyy(m): 7:11pm On Oct 23, 2011 |
wordtalk: In that manner, giving is reciprocal. "Give, and it shall be given unto you" (Luke 6:38) is a fundamental axiom - and that is also 'love-driven'. There was this fraudster in a church I was attending; he was quite active in the giving department. Always willing to play his part (by giving generously) in any request to give. But that did not stop him from ending up broke. The question I want to ask is this; how come this rule or principle did not apply in his case? wordtalk: In that manner, giving is reciprocal. "Give, and it shall be given unto you" (Luke 6:38) is a fundamental axiom - and that is also 'love-driven'. But does that imply that our act of charity or display of love neighbor should dependent on the resulting reward? Is the act of charity/love conditional? Is that the message from the Luke chapter? That we give only when there is a reward? My understanding of charity differs. Christ talked about the reward resulting from our act of Christian acts, but he did not command us to love for the reward. Giving in anticipation of reward implies that one will not give if there is no reward attached. This type of giving is definitely not driven by love. There is more to giving than just dropping that 10% in the offering box. Even Ananias gave and was ‘rewarded’ for his effort 1 Corinthians 13:3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.1Timothy 1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:wordtalk: However, I think many Christians often confuse this idea 'love-driven' giving for lending on interest in Luke 6:35 (KJV) -
[list]'But love ye your enemies, and do good, and LEND, HOPING FOR NOTHING AGAIN; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil.'[/list]
The word 'LEND' in that verse is 'daneizō', defined by Strong's G1155 as "to loan on interest; reflexively to borrow".
When Christ said to 'lend, hoping for nothing again', it appears He was highlighting what the Law of Moses already stipulated in Leviticus 25:35-36 about taking no usury (i.e., "interest" on loans/lending/debts among the Jews. I think you are pushing it too far. I hope you don’t mind zikkyy asking; what exactly is the message in the Luke verse? Was Christ talking about the act of lending or was it a message on charity? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is It Okay To Pay Your Tithe To A Man Of God? by Zikkyy(m): 7:15pm On Oct 21, 2011 |
bros12345: Answer: The principles do not work in isolation. so, how do you explain the stingy, but 'hard working' and 'creative thinking' chaps that made it to the top  bros12345: Answer:
My dear, life is a circle of input and output. The heavens gives the earth rain. Then the earth evaporates those same water back to the sky and helps life production, then those evaporated water comes back to the earth in multiplied formats again. That's the circle.
Man feeds the elephant and the elephant produces huge manure that fertilizes what feeds man back. Its a circle. This i understand, cos one can 'walk through' the process/circle (except the multiplied bit  ), but . . . . . bros12345: You donate and /or give to support good causes and nature creates avenues to bring back into your life in good measure. . . . . . . .this bit needs explanation. I was hoping you'll not attempt to 'dance' around it. There's a gap, a void you need to fill here. I need to understand nature's recycling process  we understand the heavens giving rain and the rain evaporating, what you need to teach now is how nature takes my giving, multiply 100fold and create avenues for me to collect. Also deal with what you might call an abnormal situation. i.e nature giving without me having to complete the circle by giving out  bros12345: Answer: All kinds of giving are of equal importance. That you tithe does not mean you should not help others and that you help others does not mean that you should not tithe. so are saying one will not make it to the top if he fails to engage or miss out on any of the required givings? BTW, can you provide a list? bros12345: Thanks Thank you daddy bros  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Stop The Attacks On Other Faiths! by Zikkyy(m): 12:14pm On Oct 21, 2011 |
Enigma: Jobalua/Azibagbaje LOL  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is It Okay To Pay Your Tithe To A Man Of God? by Zikkyy(m): 12:07pm On Oct 21, 2011 |
bros12345: Son, let me lecture you a bit. Okay daddy bros, am listening  bros12345: Principles like giving, creative thinking, persistence, meditation, hard work, etc, will always push you to the top in life. . . emm daddy bros, i have some questions if you don't mind  1. the principles you listed, can they work in isolation? or one need a combination of all principles to get to the top? i know you did state that giving alone will not work, but i know some stingy but 'hard working' and 'creative thinking' chaps that made it to the top  2. this giving you talked about, is it all embracing? does it include the casino (kalo-kalo) giving? What about the greasing of palms required to conclude some deals (i know this one works  )? 3. I can understand creative thinking, persistence and hard work, but how does giving translate to success? You can choose not to give and still be successful, this approach does work for some people. you need to explain this principle, how it work. 4. by giving, you mean any form of giving abi? and not just tithing. So i can give assist the other brother (and not pay tithe to church or pstor) and still qualify for success abi? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Does God Require Tithes? by Zikkyy(m): 9:07am On Oct 21, 2011 |
Joagbaje: God doesn't need tithe. We are the one that needs to conquer our greed by giving. There are two important things about our givings. They are honour to a God. Man cannot worship a God without giving and sacrifices. The second part of our giving is our ability to deal with greed. You don change gear again  i think the first part make some sense, but i believe there is something wrong with the second, or maybe your post is not complete. the ability to give does not imply we have truly conquered greed, as some givings are also motivated by greed. Conquering greed goes beyond just giving. If you want to help people deal with greed, then teach them the giving that's love driven. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is It Okay To Pay Your Tithe To A Man Of God? by Zikkyy(m): 8:46am On Oct 21, 2011 |
bros12345: In the garden of eden, the forbidden fruit was to be Adam and Eve's tithe. God could have asked them to chopulate every [size=14pt]damn[/size] thing there, I can't believe i missed this bit on first reading  Bros you be correct guy  |