5minsmadness's Posts
Nairaland Forum › 5minsmadness's Profile › 5minsmadness's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 187 pages)
angelchinny:Hehehehehe ![]() Good one! It seems his friends are also a major issue. Can't u find a way to keep him away from them? Don't do it directly cos it will have a negative result, rather insist on him being home early and raise hell if he isn't. OR Call him at odd hours when he's outside and send him message e.g "pls dear buy banana and groundnut for me on your way back. ". Tomorrow it could be 'since u r outside could u buy bread and garri on your way back, also add bathing soap cos the kids have not had thier bath... Etc" Men HATE being sent messages like these but have no concrete reasons to refuse them. Soon he would prefer being at home early instead of letting u spoil his fun outside. Na secret I don blow for u oh! |
He's a philanderer. Whether u leave or stay won't change his philandering ways. He'll stop when he's tired. Pls don't leave him. Do the condom thing. Refuse to have sex with him unless he puts on a condom. If he asks why tell him to his face that you don't trust him and you don't want any diseases. That will hurt. |
HungerBAD:High five bro. |
TV01:What brought this about? ![]() Anyway, you have a point. Women invariably fall in love with men because they are men, not lily-livered ninnies who cry to prove they can get in touch with thier feminine side. I tend to be apocalyptic about these things and feel its all part of the end-time agenda. the subjugation of man and the overturning of his dominion over all creation, including women. I however do not subscribe to ignoring a woman's happiness though. Forging ahead dogmatically at the expense of the woman's comfort could spell future disaster. Women are built to be pampered. You may not need to always sucumb to thier illogocal whims and caprices but every once in a while u need to indulge them and allow them shine. It allows for smoother symbiosis. |
netotse: The Ekiti governor is a relic of the old order; he represents the old Nigeria of waste, of hollow ritual of noise and nuisance. Fayose is a man suffering from political depression in the aftermath of the defeat of his patriarch Goodluck Jonathan. He is a hallucinating man of the ancient, yet to come to terms with the realities of a new dawn and new Nigeria...Choi ![]() Honestly the guy sounded like a typical nairalander dishing out well placed vitriol! ![]() But I agree that he might as well have been talking to a brick wall. Fayose aint gonna change anytime soon. |
GHoJes:Nah, that moniker ain't jennyluv. Most androids have the issue with the fullstop thingie and with most people it becomes habit to correct it while typing. Also jennyluv couldn't construct a complete sentence properly to save her life. No offence. Cc Pickabeau1 |
For others who like to chatter it's easy. They would gleefully go to their friends house and tell them all the juicy tidbits all in the name of 'am your friend o, I don't want you to have HIV and die!' Such friends are the same ones who will insist you leave him or her and will look down on you if you dare forgive your partner or refuse to get a divorce. As if it's thier life! Rubbish! You are not part of the relationship. Allow them sort themselves out! If you feel the need to warn about HIV do it tactfully. Tell the guilty spouse that you'll need her to do an HIV test else you wil report her partner. Warn her that next time you catch her she'll be in soup. Attack the guilty party and let her be the one to confide or Confess what she has done! She's the one involved in the relationship, it's her choice not yours! Most normal human beings when caught by a third party would retrace thier steps knowing they have been given a second chance. If they don't repent then you know you did your best to maintain our friends happiness and then u can report directly and with TACT. not as if you have finally found a good morsel of meat to chew on or worse yet tell everyone of your friends except the person involved |
cococandy:That depends on my closeness with the person. If It's a friend's wife and I saw them cheating without a doubt I would confront her about it outright and warn her. Her knowing that I know would probably put an end to her philandering ways. I would still need to catch her a second time before I reported, or if she was unrepentant in our encounter I would report. At most I'd send an anonymous text. If it was family e.g my brother then it's directly my business. Honestly though I still think I would approach the guilty party first. Or at most send an anonymous message to my bro to tip him off. I would only tell straight away if she has been known for such bad behavior in the past or if on confronting her she dares me. |
[quote author=cococandy post=37617215][/quote]I mind my damn business! This is not a gender thing here but common curtesy! If I see my friend's wife coming out of a joint with a man the best I will do is say "Hi" to her and go my merry way! I wont run to her husband and say "ehen , by the way I saw your wife coming out of a joint with a man I dont know, I dont know what they went in there to do, I think you should start suspecting your wife..." That's infantile! Then if he replies "Oh, that was her buisness partner Tim, she had a meeting with him this afternoon", Then I'll nod in satisfaction of info that is none of my buisness. Tomorrow I see her with another guy in a car I'll run to my friend "ehen, I saw your wife with another man in a car o, I dont know what she's up to". My friend says, "thats her brother, he just came into town." Omo if I'm my friend next time I see me coming I'll cross the street and run the other way! Friend indeed! |
Chidoks:MISS B sees Mrs C's husband with another woman at a joint. Instead of her 'being a friend' and going to tell Mrs C direct she comes and tatafoes to you, giving you juicy tidbits. the moment you show lack of interest she picks offence and starts insulting you for not listening to her or suppporting her in her quest to ensure she lets Mrs C know her husband is with another woman. Why does she need you, why cant she do it herself? If she really had her friend's well being at heart is broadcasting the possibility that her friend's husband is cheating and possibly slandering the man the best way to go about it? If she really had her friend's best interest at heart wouldnt she have quietly called the friend instead of spreading what could be pure falsehood? You later send her an sms and she replies with more venom...why hasnt she told her friend herself? Wetin come concern you wey no even see the thing with your own eyes? Can you swear on your life that she didnt even make it up? BUSIBODI! That's what such people are called, no two ways about it! They go about gossiping and spreading their own assumptions for something they cannot verify. Telling others how they saw Mr A in a car with a woman, how they saw Mrs B holding hands with her boss when she thought no one was looking, how they caught Miss C eyeing her husband in the house when they went to visit and betting the coouple just had a fight and are trying to hide it. It doesnt concern you. If she feels so concerned she should report to the wife herself. No need getting you involved in it as you didnt see it. |
Chidoks:Dont let anybody force you into doing something you are uncomfortable with! I have given my opinion on this matter, thats the end of it, anybody running around to tell their friend something unverifiable is a BUSIBODI! What nonsense! In fact after a while of 'mistaken reporting' your own friend will start to avoid you. |
kramfonos: |
Such a touching story! And I read every word. That's why forgiveness is very important in any relationship. A Catholic saint once said a lot in the world has been destroyed through misunderstandings and things left unsaid. Forgiveness will heal you faster than payback ever will! |
People who are BITTER are the ones who most SUFFER! |
What a crock of bull ![]() Tell your friend, tell your friend TELL YOUR FRIEND WHAT? That you saw her husband with 'a woman' somewhere... and so? Do you know who the woman is? Tomorrow you see him in the market with another woman again u will run and 'tell your friend'? Only highly JOBLESS individuals and BUSIBODIES do such! Maybe u should just follow the husband everywhere he goes just to make sure he isn't being unfaithful, afterall it's all part of being a good friend! |
AfricanApple:I didn't know babes smoke weed too ![]()
|
Kimoni:You are seriously paranoid. Oh wait, you already admitted it. ![]() Somtimes I let them slide from the Stairway and catch them as they fall. It's mad fun ![]() |
. |
So romantic ![]() Nice one op Such a woman can never give her hubby high bp. |
If you were religious I'd say you should pray. You didn't have any issues with your man until the wedding date started drawing close. All of a sudden you are having communication or whatever issues and a charming young man(snake) comes into your life. A legend I read about a long time ago tells of how a person's good fortune is always put to the test at the last minute just to see if you are indeed worthy of such fortune. If you pass the test u live happily ever after. If u fail, u regret it for the rest of your life. Choose wisely. |
Done it a couple of times, no biggie for me. The only thing is thier mom got upset when she found out i was giving her kids beer to help them sleep at night...She refused to leave them with me after that ![]() |
ayogun22: ![]() So basically the real reason you are pissed is cos you didnt smash her when u had the chance! ![]() Bros hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehee you are beginnning to sound immature o ![]() You already verbally abused her like u said, why repeat it? Abeg I'm trying to be insane this morning, dont let me give you another lecture, go an do wat you like! |
ayogun22:How is she a runsgirl? |
@ayogun22, The reason you are still bothered has nothing to do with whether u are rich or matured or any of those things. It's cos she still has your mumu button i.e you still have feelings for her and you are hurt by what she did. It's a terrible thing when u find someone u loved and trusted has been using you for a ride. It's hurts like sh1t. The thing is u can send that text or not, the truth is if she still doesn't reply you won't feel better. I would advice you to send the text(yes I said it, send it) to let her know how you feel. However send it as a final text and remove the words slut etc. Just be honest with how you feel she has let u down and leave it at that. Move on. Such people are not worth it. |
realdee44:Madness mode deactivated Sickle-cell haemoglobin C is another variant of the sickle cell genotype which is not as common as haemoglobin S. Sickle cell crises in people with SC is usually not as severe as those with SS. The genotypes AA show normal pxts; AS: don't show any symptoms; SS: sickle cell disease; AC: don't show any symptoms; CC: do not show outward characteristics. SC: This condition is associated with recurrent anaemia (breakdown of red cells in the blood vessels) and pain crises (vaso-occlusive crises). Some may also experience aseptic necrosis of the thigh bone e.g my ex. The hip becomes extremely painful and she walks with a limp. However when an AC person marries an SC person, the chance of having a sickle cell baby is 50%, because for every pregnancy there is a chance of having any of the following genotypes, AS, AC, SC and CC. Dazzall. Madness mode reactivated ![]() |
freecocoa:I condemn it in all its totality! That's why I'm asking for the address so I can see him eye to eye and "address" him properly... |
The report is not complete. They should have put the address of the place along with its opening and closing hours. |
Durinsday:Don't mind them. Looking for whatever material they can to discredit the bible. Later they will say they don't have an agenda! Lemme charge my phone. |
Its amazing how you atheists lap up stories from your white masters without questioning them. On one hand you laugh at the black man for not questioning the faith the white folk brought to Africa's shores, calling it made up, illogical and silly. On the other hand you still follow this same white man without question, rejoicing in the stupidity of his shallow thinking and biased reasoning. Let's start with the quote below. "All David has is this sling," because that's the first mistake that we make. In ancient warfare, there are three kinds of warriors. There's cavalry, men on horseback and with chariots. There's heavy infantry, which are foot soldiers, armed foot soldiers with swords and shields and some kind of armor. And there's artillery, and artillery are archers, but, more importantly, slingers.Are you saying in the whole army of the isrealites there wasn't a single slinger? If the slingshot was so deadly as your white shallow atheist says, why didn't one of the so called skilled slingers simply approach Goliath and put an end to the fight? Why let an inexperienced little Shepherd boy who had little to no known experience using said sling for warfare in the first place? Unless you are saying there were no slingers in the isrealites army(which cancels Ted's reasoning) then you have to admit that Goliath was so formidable even the slingers were afraid of him(thus also cancelling Ted's illogical reasoning). So what's Goliath? He's heavy infantry, and his expectation when he challenges the Israelites to a duel is that he's going to be fighting another heavy infantryman. When he says, "Come to me that I might feed your flesh to the birds of the heavens and the beasts of the field," the key phrase is "Come to me." Come up to me because we're going to fight, hand to hand, like this. Saul has the same expectation. David says, "I want to fight Goliath," and Saul tries to give him his armor, because Saul is thinking, "Oh, when you say 'fight Goliath,' you mean 'fight him in hand-to-hand combat,' infantry on infantryYou don't chose your opponents weapon in a war. So if a slinger came forth from the isrealites army would Goliath had turned tail and run cos he wasn't carrying a slingshot as well? Also if Goliath wanted "hand-to-hand" combat, he wouldn't have come with his shield and spear. And don't dare mention his shield and spear being too heavy for him; if it was, why would he carry it to battle in the first place. Do you think he became the Philistine champion by measuring height and weight? No! He did it by becoming one of the most deadly, ferocious and unconquerable foes the enemy could face. So lying that Goliath was simply a clumsy oaf with acromegaly is a lie straight from the pit of he'll and illogical to boot. I know you will be in a hurry to respond. Be patient. I'll be right back. Perhaps this will be a good time to think of some logical excuses to cover your asses in believing this nonsense cooked up by an atheist nobody. Am back. There's a second piece of this that's important. It's not just that we misunderstand David and his choice of weaponry. It's also that we profoundly misunderstand Goliath. Goliath is not what he seems to be. There's all kinds of hints of this in the Biblical text, things that are in retrospect quite puzzling and don't square with his image as this mighty warrior. So to begin with, the Bible says that Goliath is led onto the valley floor by an attendant. Now that is weird, right? Here is this mighty warrior challenging the Israelites to one-on-one combat. Why is he being led by the hand by some young boy, presumably, to the point of combat? Secondly, the Bible story makes special note of how slowly Goliath moves, another odd thing to say when you're describing the mightiest warrior known to man at that point. And then there's this whole weird thing about how long it takes Goliath to react to the sight of David. So David's coming down the mountain, and he's clearly not preparing for hand-to-hand combat. There is nothing about him that says, "I am about to fight you like this." He's not even carrying a sword. Why does Goliath not react to that? It's as if he's oblivious to what's going on that day. And then there's that strange comment he makes to David: "Am I a dog that you should come to me with sticks?" Sticks? David only has one stick.The above quote is further atheistic bullsh1t propounded in a desperate attempt to explain away David's good fortune. In arguments atheists say the bible is inaccurate. In other arguments they swear on the Bible's accuracy to prove a point. "Am I dog that you would come against me with sticks" is an inconsequential phrase. As long as those sticks were on one of David's hands it wouldn't have mattered. A battle was about to take place. Also from your "intelligent but stupid" atheist Ted he already said David approached him from a distance. So it was most likely that David hadn't come close enough for Goliath or ANYBODY for that matter to see whether he was holding a stick or "sticks" in his hand. Once again in an attempt to paint Goliath as Stvpid the op contradicts himself. Are you saying this was the first battle Goliath was fighting? Are you saying Goliath couldn't weird his own armour or weapons? How then did he become d people's champion? By measuring height? Goliath was the people's champion! He was a celebrity! Of course he had cup bearers ans shield and spear carriers! He had an entourage just as any important person in those days would have. And once again it wouldn't have mattered if he was going into battle. It would be foolish of the Philistines to choose a champion that needed to be aided simply to get unto the battlefield. Therefore what the op is trying to explain is total rubbish! The god you don't believe in save you that my battery has run down. I for finish una today. |
Icecomrade:NO YOU DIDNT! TELL ME YOU DIDNT DO THAAAAAAT!!!! rolls on the floor screaming |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 187 pages)



Of course, my husband thinks I am paranoid but I remind him of my 9 month journey 