₦airaland Forum

Hmmm,

Did an article (about 4 hours ago) and sent same to the media houses (without stating the bank anyway) and tried to proffer solutions to the problem.

You can see a copy at http://www.afamnnaji.com/blog_view.php?myview_id=33

Thanks for the info. Personally I prefer negative criticisms to positive ones as one rule everyone will ultimately learn in this life is to prepare for the worst while hoping for the best.

As they say success is 10% luck, 90% hardwork and 100% perseverance.

There were days I will get emails with one liners like "your website is not fine". What do I do? I just reply and say thanks, but it's making money for me and that's what matters.

Even after sending the reply I go back to the website and look for things I could make better and today not throwing away negative criticisms has made me a better web developer.

chidichris:
wow! wonders shall never end. Afam, u have made my day for atleast saying obj did wrong for once.

The problem people like you have is that once someone does not agree completely with everything you say you tag the person one thing or the other.

Have I ever defended OBJ's wrong doing? Or must I agree with whatever you say including calling him unprintable names to make you happy?

I stand for honesty, truth, facts and objectivity in all I do and believe me there are no exceptions to these rules.

ajayi1:
the best way is to get your Lawyer, If you know that your idea is a genuine idea. So anybody that do the idea at your back will be jailed.

Jailed? What for?

What if I already have the idea before you imagine you have it?

We should be realistic, in a world full of billions of people you never know what ideas your neighbour may have that you may imagine you are just coming up with.

Is the continued detention of Al-Mustapha right? Certainly NO.

So why attack the poster who aired his opinion on this matter?

If they have evidence against him they should go ahead and try him and if found guilty he should be punished accordingly but if found innocent he should be freed.

The type of vengeful imprisonment at the hands of OBJ is wrong and I doubt if Yar'adua won't tow the same line considering the fact that his elder brother died during Abacha's reign.

Holding someone for about 8 years without concluding the case is very very wrong.

@tundewoods,

I will give you 2 numbers for 2 different people/business/brands. Tell them Afam sent you and I am sure you will get them at the stated prices.

The one I got

Price - N22,500.00
Brand - They claim its dell but I doubt it, the logo is not standard dell logo in my opinion but it solves my power problem and its new
Manual - Poorly written english but understandable

Contact - 08034121486

Another one I would have bought if I had time

Price - N23,000.00
Brand - Mercury

Contact - 018171573

Which elendureports? The same one that claimed that they got confirmation from the hospital that Yar'adua was dead? Abeg, wey my tom and jerry make I watch better thing.

The model is Black berry pearl and the N65,000.00 was for the device according to the MTN guy that called me (I am still awaiting a detailed email as I was busy on the phone when he called so I asked him to do an email which he promised to do).

The N6,500.00 or N6,000.00 is for the monthly subscription according to a friend that works there, fortunately for her MTN gave them at no cost so I couldn't get the price from her.

Hope this helps.

NB: I am interested in getting confirmation for the N39,000.00 someone stated here sha.

Considering the fact that fairly used ones may have problems that may not be obvious why don't you consider getting brand new ones for N22,500.00 each?

I got one some 2 weeks ago, takes just 36W as against the about 250W the regular CRT type was taking and this has added more time to my backup.

I sent an email/message from MTN website and MTN later called me concerning the Blackberry device and they told me it goes for N65,000.00.

Is the N39,000.00 official from MTN?

And for the internet connection, a friend that works there said it's N6,500.00 per month.

my2cents:
Remember, you are the same person who, on this forum, boasted to all about how you put up an 800-page website

Timmy get a lot of energy to set that website up and don't forget that he has to manually update the pages.

A properly written script would make the management of such a website easy.

There is a difference between executing someone that has killed a human being and executing someone wrongly.

I am interested in executing anyone that takes another life.

Anyone that kills another does not deserve to live, is this not simple and rational enough?

Excellent reply.

It seems some of us don't even understand the meaning of the word evidence.

How can people point to poor road network or power supply as evidence that someone looted money?

The level of discussion is really discouraging and while I agree that a forum is meant to share or exchange ideas, it is certainly not an alternative to proper education.

vigasimple:
Chidichris

it is very clear that you are ill informed about events.

I have tried so many times in the past to pass the same message across for tough luck so I try as much as I can to allow him continue to sing a song he enjoys so much.

When people allow unnecessary sentiments and stiff mindsets to guide their thought processes the results are always the same - "I must be right and everyone else must be wrong and anyone that disagrees with me must working for OBJ or Ribadu". God help us all.

The US and the world is better off without Bush and Cheney

Now let us test the genuineness of our positions especially for those that are opposed to death penalty.

How many of you are in support of the war on terror especially those targeted at Osama and Al qaeda?

Oya, make we see the objectivity for hia.

Server not found













Firefox can't find the server at www.cnwebmaster.org.








* Check the address for typing errors such as
ww.example.com instead of
www.example.com

* If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network
connection.

* If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.

Do yo expect the US to kill someone whose family is in a business partnership with the family of Bush?

Wake up, this is still morning.

BABEELOVE:
welcome back denex!!!

Did you notice the date this thread was opened?

I-man:
The man is a gratuitously mendacious oaf . His only value,if any, is comedic.

Come, na English you been read for school because the way you dey take hala grammar for hia no get part2?

From my inbox, read and enjoy

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

George W. Bush: A CIA Analysis
by Ray McGovern

It is as though I'm back as an analyst at the CIA, trying
to estimate the chances of an attack on Iran. The putative
attacker, though, happens to be our own president.

It is precisely the work we analysts used to do. And, while
it is still a bit jarring to be turning our analytical
tools on the U.S. leadership, it is by no means entirely
new. For, of necessity, we Veteran Intelligence
Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) have been doing that for
almost six years now – ever since 9/11, when "everything
changed." Of necessity? Yes, because, with very few
exceptions, American journalists lose their jobs if they
expose things like fraudulent wars.

The craft of CIA analysis was designed to be an all-source
operation, meaning that we analysts were responsible – and
held accountable – for assimilating information from all
sources and coming to judgments on what it all meant. We
used information of all kinds, from the most sophisticated
technical collection platforms to spies to open media.

Here I have to reveal a trade secret, which punctures the
mystique of intelligence analysis. Generally speaking,
80 percent of the information one needs to form judgments
on key intelligence targets or issues is available in open
media.

It helps to have training from past masters of media
analysis, which began in a structured way in targeting
Japanese and German media in the 1940s. But, truth be
told, everyone with a high-school education can do it.
It is not rocket science.

This is not to denigrate the contribution of CIA operations
officers, case officers running sensitive agents, for
though small in percentage of the whole nine yards
available to be analyzed, information from such sources
can often make a crucial contribution.

Consider, for example, the daring recruitment in mid-2002
of Saddam Hussein's foreign minister, Naji Sabri, who was
"turned" into working for the CIA and quickly established
his credibility. Sabri told us there were no weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq.

My former colleagues, perhaps a bit naively, were quite
sure this would come as a vast relief to President George
W. Bush and his advisers. Instead, they were told that
the White House had no further interest in reporting from
Sabri; rather, that the issue was not really WMD, it was
"regime change."

(Don't feel embarrassed if you did not know this; our
corporate-owned, war-profiteering media has largely
suppressed all this.)

So our former colleague, operations officer par excellence
Robert Baer, reports (in this week's Time) that, according
to his sources, the Bush/Cheney administration is winding
up for a strike on Iran, that Bush's plan to put Iran's
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on the terrorism list
points in the direction of such a strike, and that
delusional "neoconservative" thinking that still guides
White House policy concludes that such an attack would
lead to the fall of the clerics and rise of a more friendly
Iran.

Hold on, it gets even worse: Baer's sources tell him that
administration officials are thinking that "as long as we
have bombers and missiles in the air, we will hit Iran's
nuclear facilities."

VIPs member Phil Giraldi, writing in The American
Conservative, earlier noted that Karl Rove has served as a
counterweight to Vice President Dick Cheney, determined as
Cheney seems to be to expand the Middle East quagmire to
Iran.

And former Pentagon analyst retired Lt. Col. Karen
Kwiatkowski, who worked shoulder-to-shoulder with the most
rabid Pentagon neocons just before the attack on Iraq, has
put into words (on LewRockwell.com) speculation several of
us have been indulging in with respect to Rove's departure.

In short, it seems a good bet that Rove, who is no one's
dummy and would not want to have to "spin" an unnecessary
war on Iran, lost the battle with Cheney over the merits
of a military strike on Iran, and only then decided to
spend more time with his family.

Whatever else Rove has been, he has served as a counter-
weight to Dick Cheney's clear desire to expand the Middle
East quagmire into Iran.

As for White House spokesperson Tony Snow, it seems equally
possible that, before deciding he has to make more money,
he concluded that his stomach could not withstand the task
explaining why Bush/Cheney needed to attack Iran.

With the propaganda buildup we have seen so far, what
seems most likely, at least initially, is an attack on
Revolutionary Guard training facilities inside Iran, and
that can be done with cruise missiles.

With some 20 targets already identified by anti-Iranian
groups, there are enough assets already in place to do that
job. But the while-we're-at-it neocon logic referred to
above may well be applied after, or even during, that kind
of attack from the air.

Yes, it is happening again.

The lead editorial in Tuesday's Washington Post
regurgitates the unproven allegations that Iran's
Revolutionary Guard Corps is "supplying the weapons that
are killing a growing number of American soldiers in Iraq;"
that it is "waging war against the United States and trying
to kill as many American soldiers as possible."

Designating Iran a "specially designated global terrorist"
organization, says the Post, "seems to be the least the
United States should be doing, giving the soaring number
of Iranian-sponsored bomb attacks in Iraq."

It's as though Dick Cheney is again writing the Post
editorials. And not only that, arch neocon James Woolsey
has just told Lou Dobbs that the U.S. may have no choice
but to bomb Iran in order to halt its nuclear weapons
program.

As Woolsey puts it, "I'm afraid within, well, at worst, a
few months; at best, a few years; they could have the bomb."

Woolsey, self-described "anchor of the Presbyterian wing of
the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs," has
long been way out in front plumbing for wars, like Iraq,
that he and other neocons myopically see as being in
Israel's, as well as America's, interest.

Within days of 9/11, Woolsey was arguing for war with Iraq
even while conceding, at the time, that there was no
evidence tying Iraq to 9/11.

The latest is also rubbish. And Woolsey knows it. And so
do the reporters for the Washington Post, who are aware
of, but have been forbidden to tell, a highly interesting
story.


The NIE That Didn't Bark

The National Intelligence Estimate on if and when Iran is
likely to have the bomb has been ready since February.
It has been sent back four times – no doubt because its
conclusions do not support what folks like Cheney and
Woolsey are telling the president.

The conclusions of the most recent NIE on the issue (early
2005) was that Iran could probably not have a nuclear
weapon until "early to mid-next decade," a formula
memorized and restated by Director of National Intelligence
Michael McConnell at his confirmation hearing in February.

One can safely assume that McConnell had been fully briefed
on the first "final draft" of the new estimate, which has
now been in limbo for half a year. It is a safe bet that
the conclusions of the new draft resemble those of the 2005
estimate all too closely to suit Cheney.

It is a scandal that the congressional oversight committees
have not been able to get hold of the new estimate, even in
draft. For it is a safe bet it would give the lie to the
claims of Cheney, Woolsey, and other cheerleaders for war
with Iran and provide powerful ammunition to those arguing
for a more sensible approach to Iran.

Despite the administration's warlike record, many Americans
may still cling to the belief that attacking Iran won't
happen because it would be crazy; that Bush is a lame-duck
president who wouldn't dare undertake a new reckless
adventure when the last one went so badly.

But – with this administration – rationality has not
exactly been a strong suit. Bush has placed himself in a
neoconservative bubble that operates with its own false
sense of reality. As psychiatrist Justin Frank noted in
a July 27 memorandum updating his book, Bush on the Couch:

"We are left with a president who cannot actually govern,
because he is incapable of reasoned thought in coping with
events outside his control, like those in the Middle East.

"This makes it a monumental challenge – as urgent as it is
difficult – not only to get him to stop the carnage in the
Middle East, but also to prevent him from undertaking a
new, perhaps even more disastrous adventure – like going
to war with Iran, in order to embellish the image he so
proudly created for himself after 9/11 as the commander
in chief of 'the first war of the 21st century.'"

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Anyone that takes the life of another deserves to be put to death.

Abi oooo, all dem double standard don tire me!

Everybody should mind their business well well, including everyone

@funloving,

I don't know anything about company executive, that is Guardian for you.

On the issue of dictatorship vs democracy I raised the issue somewhere and justice was done to the thread.

See the following link if you have time and see for yourself what dictators have done in the past to shape great economies today.

http://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/board/main-square/39858-chavez-charges-change.html

As for the other issues you raised I will leave you to be your own judge.

Enjoy the coming weekend.

I actually stopped buying newspapers about 2 years ago.

In reality, some nonsense and very misleading headlines on our newspapers go to show that the owners are really interested in making money not protecting the interest of Nigerians.

If OBJ did not read newspapers and developed Nigeria very well will some of us be saying what we are saying?

Reading or not reading newspapers (especially Nigerian newspapers) has very little to do with whether a leader will do well or not.

A leader that wants to work will work regardless of what the newspapers say or whether he/she reads them.

And you are being told to remember to

1. call a spade a spade

2. understand that now one has questioned God's authority here so what's with your "it does not stop God from being God"? This angle has never been in the equation mind you.

Those who spread or manufacture falsehood should be told it is not in anyone's interest.

Baffles me how positive changes being experienced right now in Nigeria is being watered down by some Nigerians especially those living outside Nigeria.

Who is afraid of a better Nigeria? Sometimes it seems that Nigerians living outside Nigeria prefer to see Nigeria remain backward.

Yar'adua is in charge of the train and he does not intend to apply the brakes until he takes Nigeria to its destination or close to it.

If you can't live with the reality today, kindly take up foreign nationality and leave Nigeria alone, enough of the bad mouthing.

It is people who support others blindly like this that will do anything a pastor says even if it is evil. For them it is what the pastor says that matter and not what the bible says.

One thing you people (that keep talking about touch not my anointed) is that in the first place are all these people claiming to be men of God actually men of God? This is the most important question otherwise a Lawrence Anini could claim to be a man of God and do you assume everyone must now believe him?

The same bible that you reference makes it clear that by their fruits you shall know them so if a pastor keeps sleeping with prostitutes he should be exposed and such exposures and condemnation will be in order and in accordance with the bible not what your pastor says.

Little wonder the people willingly drank cyanide because they believed a pastor that adviced them to do so - Guyana , crime of the century.

I hope all these foot soldiers of TB have never complained about OBJ or other past leaders in Nigeria otherwise they will be guilty of pure and unadulterated hypocrisy and sycophancy.

ufobabe:
GOD'S WORD MUST COME 2 PAST WHETHER HUMANS LIKE IT OR NOT.

And his prophecies have not come to pass.

ufobabe:
HIS WORDS MAY NOT BE IMMEDIATELY BUT WILL SURELY COME

Excellent rubbish. OBJ has finished his 8 years in office and is alive today, so educate us on when this important prophecy about OBJ will come to pass.

ufobabe:
PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE PLS MIND HOW You TALK ABOUT A MAN OF GOD because ONE CAN JUST PLACE CAUSE ON HIMELF OR HERSELF WITH JUST SAYING NONESENSE

AM NOT HIS MEMBER BUT DON'T MOCK TUNDE PLSSSSSSSSSSSSS, ELSE You ARE MOCKING GOD.
AND GOD CANNOT BE MOCKED

I agree with you but again it is plain stupid to believe every one that claims to be a man of God. Go and check your bible about what people will do with the name of God in the last days.

I ask again, is Rev King not a man of God?

Do not be in a hurry to design a website that a client is paying for when you have not taken time to understand how things like what you are asking work on the internet as the finished website will go a long way in shaping your web design business and remember that first impressions matter a lot.

My advice is for you to take time to try your hands on a lot of web designs at your own time but collecting money to deliver what you are not sure of is not a good idea.