₦airaland Forum

Singapore1:
Lol 1 champions league Cup is preferred than a million champions league appearance!

Ajax is more successful than man city

benji93:
78 points. I don't remember the last time I saw that. I am loving the new rules.

patrickmuf:
Juventus have reached more UCL finals than Manchester United but Manchester United have won more, will it make sense to say Juventus have been more successful?

Or better put in the past 5 years, will Spurs fans rather finish above Arsenal every season instead of Spurs winning the FA Cup twice?

In the past 5 years Liverpool have won the UCL once and reached the final once...Has Bayern appeared in 2 finals in the same time frame?

timbros:
Every Man City fan (and players even) will give up that 2nd place spot in UEFA ranking just to lift Champions League trophy within the blink of an eye.

Man City (2nd) without UCL trophy will prefer to be Liverpool (3rd) or Chelsea (4th) with UCL trophy anytime any day.

I don't know why people will say black is white and white is black just to win an argument.

NinjaXmetahuman:
[s]see how you are dancing from pillar to post cos you can't defend your own shit.

That's what happens when you jump into people's argument trying to form intelligent.

You sometimes learn more from reading other people's arguement than trying to force your half baked opinion on argument you don't know the origin or what it is about.
This is not the first time you will be jumping on my arguement trying to form Macho without adding anything significant from your tiny brain.[/s]

At bolded,
Where did UEFA tell you that? Coefficient is sorely based on games you have won. That's why the likes of Bayern and England are always topping the list. The only impact winning the trophy has is that, you will get the chance to win more games all the way to final which adds to the coefficient not the trophy itself.
And that's the question you failed to answer cos you couldn't.

[s]And it has nothing to do with the initial question I asked.

This my last post to you sha.
Have a nice life[/s].

NinjaXmetahuman:
did they consider winning a UCL trophy as part of the coefficient even. if you didn't win much games, you will be rated high?

If not, why would it be the answer to my question?

NinjaXmetahuman:
[s][/s]
Again.

Was trophy part of the coefficient?
If not, why would it be the answer to my question?

Android17:
Winning it is part of how you get extra coefficient points obviously.

NinjaXmetahuman:
lol

Again.

Was trophy part of the coefficient?
If not, why would it be the answer to my question?

NinjaXmetahuman:
lol
except that the data is no where near the question.

The data you posted was about points won NOT points and UCL trophies won. So why would it be your answer?

Trying to wriggle your way out of the sea you didn't think well before jumping into yeah?
Then you need to learn more from your boss.

NinjaXmetahuman:
lol
except that the data is no where near the question.

The data you posted was about points won NOT points and UCL trophies won. So why would it be your answer?

Trying to wriggle your way out of the sea you didn't think well before jumping into yeah?
Then you need to learn more from your boss.

NinjaXmetahuman:
Now Lemme ask, Which team would you say has been better in the last 5 years In UCL?

Mancity with more points
Or Chelsea with UCL trophy?

NinjaXmetahuman:
the question was directed to you not UEFA.

NinjaXmetahuman:
lol
I had plenty to say but I just don't think it should be with you.
May be someone intelligent like raumdeuter.

You see the question ehn, it's like asking you to choose between money or fame? Beautiful football or trophies?

A smarter person like raumdeuter would probably ignored it or try to twist and turn, but you, you just jumped right in without thinking.

NinjaXmetahuman:
okay then.. I guess I have nothing to say to you again..

Leyqute:
FC Eruobodo don Dey beat Mourinho again sir Joezinho

I just say make I update you.

NinjaXmetahuman:
Now Lemme ask, Which team would you say has been better in the last 5 years In UCL?

Mancity with more points
Or Chelsea with UCL trophy?

NinjaXmetahuman:
or may be you should understand the argument before jumping in.
The guy didn't bring his metric for rating Bayern over other EPL teams.

Now addressing your own argument.
Bayern cannot be rated above EPL team because whatever they achieved was done in a shitty league.

The UCL that brought all of them together, they won it just once in the last 5 years. No other Bundesliga came even close to the final. The UCL is not even a proper one. It got k leg.

Mean while, same can't be said about EPL and it shows based on how teams from epl have dominated UCL in the last 5 years.

NinjaXmetahuman:
And how is Bayern bigger than premier league teams as he posited?

EPL teams won UCL twice in the last five 5years with Liverpool whooping Bayerns butt on their way to winning their 5th UCL title.
And Bayern just once.

patrickmuf:
You made a callous statement which is not factual like a lot of other stuffs online...

For the records, I am not a Chelsea fan, I only tackled you because you claimed that Bayern are currently better than all the EPL teams. It's not my business where you read it but if you must try to use it in an argument, please do well to make yourself better understood because you have been referring to the people that wrote whatever as if you only read the headline and not the write up if not, do well to point out how Bayern are currently better than all the EPL teams...

macjireh:
we have already collected 3 points from dem,,, and hoping to get another 3points....city have already lost 3 points to dem and not sure of getting 3 points on d return leg,,Liverpool have not played dem,,daz their problem and manure may not find it easy in d return,, so its our advantage

Roland17:
@Android17, remember our gist? I called it..

Roland17:
Ime Udoka doesn't need a soothsayer to tell him the problems are. I also hope he has the courage to call them out during practice

To say I am frustrated is an understatement.

AnfieldFan:
Did Zidane do something unprecedented with Castilla?
Is Castilla not Madrid too?

etidy:
The best shooter in NBA history who is often defended aggressively right from mid-court and usually double or triple teamed several times in a game but he averages 4.2 Free throws per game. A travesty.

joshboo:
. The guys that would be most affected by the rules change are Harden, doncic and Trae. I've always been a big Harden fan right from his OKC days but mehn the guys too unprofessional and the biggest choke job ever.

AnfieldFan:
Okk
Which club did he manage?

AnfieldFan:
1) No, Keane didn't get Sunderland their first 1st division football..
2) Klopp has other trophies...



Pep isn't the first coach to manage egos...
Other coaches have done it and succeeded in the past and are still succeeding currently..



First of all, I believe delivering to Dortmund their first league title since 2001 was more difficult to achieve..
Delivering our first league title since before players like Jones and Arnold were born was also more difficult...
Now, Barcelona were successful then, Rijkaard(who inherited a team that hadn't won a title in some years) delivered two back2back league titles for them(a champions league trophy too) two seasons before Guardiola was appointed...
Frank promoted Messi, Iniesta and had players like Dinho,Eto and they likes of them..
Obviously,they team already had an air of success around them..
Pep met good players, bought better ones and every player he had was world class...
Post Pep, Barcelona has lifted numerous titles

Post Barcelona, Pep hasn't lifted the champions league despite spending considerably more than every other coach within that time period and having first pick of players...
Bayern has lifted the champions league since he left..
City got him for success in Europe but nothing of such has happened...
To put it in perspective, Tuchel and Klopp have lifted the champions league in England despite spending considerably less..
Klopp is clearly in Pep's ball park and in some people's opinions, better than Pep..
Need I remind you that Fergie called Klopp personally requesting he take over United.. Fergie wouldn't do that if Klopp didn't have the nous(both tactically and charisma wise) needed to be that guy..

Roland17:
Both coaches are on the hot seat and are getting the wrong attention. I will admit, Nuno is under more pressure than Ole is and I believe he is in a must win situation, else he may gone before next weekend. Another loss for United, especially a bad one, is a luxury Ole can not afford even if you believe his job does not depend on a result against Spuds. United fans are renowned to be very aggressive and it that is not something Ole, the players and owners want to see again. Ole goes into this game looking to avoid a bad result and while a draw may keep his job (which is my hope), it doesn't take the pressure off him.

#OLEIN
#WEBELIEVEINDNA

Illimitable:
By this metric, Roy Keane is a better manager than Klopp.

Roy Keane took Sunderland from 2nd bottom in the championship to winning the championship title in the same season. Surely, that’s a bigger feat than what Klopp achieved at Mainz.

Secondly, a team that could afford to get rid of such talents aren’t easy teams to manage. The greater the talents, the more expectations. Ole was doing fine with his mediocrity until he signed Sancho, Varane and Ronaldo.

Pep took one of the most difficult jobs in the world in 2008. It could have ended like Lampard for him but dude went on to win every trophy he competed for. Messi or no Messi, that’s a laudable achievement.

Roland17:
I will never support or be indifferent in any game that involves the Spuds (shiit) irrespective of the opponent

For this reason, I will be supporting Man U against Spuds. More importantly, a victory assures me that Ole remains coach.

AnfieldFan:
Want to point out something...The first goal happened because Greenwood couldn't effectively press Robertson..Bissaka moved up to cover Jota incase he got the ball... Mctominay moved inwards towards the right of the pitch to cover the space(This leaves a space in the middle which Salah drifts into..Shaw is confused, he's seeing massive spaces, because Lindelof has drifted to cover the massive space left by Bissaka...Maguire moves inwards to the right to cover for Lindelof ..Shaw doesn't know if he should tuck inside to play Salah offside or cover for his CB's...By the time Jota releases the ball, almost all your players are in a press that has no structure and was doomed to fail from the start because it's individual instead of being team press..
My point is, blaming Shaw alone for something that was clearly a team effort is a bit unfair... Even if Shaw was Virgil playing against us, we would still be through on goal in that exact situation...
Here's what your team looked like in the press before Salah, Firmino and Keita made their runs..

Khanben:
I remember the series and Dame stunk throughout. His best output was probably 19pts or so in game 4 I think.
That being said if you pick a likely winner based on narratives then that is on you. I pick my own based on actually watching the players and matchups like I said. Nobody who understands fundamentals of basketball would have picked the Blazers to win that series unless they just wanted to push hot takes.
First the Pelicans had 4 out of the 6 best players in the series in AD, Jrue, Rondo and Mirotic. They also had the best 2 defenders in AD and Jrue. Their best player AD was a nightmare match-up for the Blazers.
So I reiterate my stance, Dame and the Blazers did not lose a series in which they were the better team, yes his play throughout was awful but his team was still the lesser team.
If you can give me a breakdown of how that Blazers team was somehow better than the Pelicans, GSW and the Grizzlies teams they lost to I am open to listen