Attackgat's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Attackgat's Profile › Attackgat's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (of 100 pages)
DeltaFire:Thats not how the law works. Is someone commits a crime, and you try to connect it to someone outside the country at the time the crime was commited, you will have to show how you communicated with the person who was outside the country. Without showing how a person outside the country communicated to you to commit a crime, there is no case |
I often agree with Reno but on this one, he got it wrong. Kanu dissolved the UK branch of IPOB after having a meeting with them, and finding them wanting. Its his organisation, he can dissolve any branch. So whats the problem with that? Kanu has since reinstated the IPOB UK branch So why did Reno resurrect an old matter that has been resolved, if not to cause trouble? Then Reno said that Kanu said that any Igbo man who attends a church Pastored by a Yoruba man, is an idiot. That video is over seven years old and Kanu has since explained that they cut out the rest of what he said that Yoruba Pastors who could not convert many of the Yoruba muslims, to Christians, should not Pastor Igbos Reno is acting like he just heard of Kanu, resurrecting old issues that have long been resolved The problem is that Kanu's supporters are going to see him as a troublemaker and bash him for it. |
Notherners got together and placed N100M on Nnamdi Kanu's head. There is no IPOB activity in the North. Yet the same Northerners have never come together to put one Kobo on Shekau's head in the 10 years Boko haram have been killing, decimating communities, raping and kidnapping, all in the North Why would a Northerner be so concerned about Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB, but is far less concerned about Shekau and Boko haram that are in the North? Can someone explain this to me? |
The Federal Governments case against IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu, is already very weak even before it started. Most of the things Kanu will be charged with are things that happened when he was not even in the country. This means that Kanu did not directly commit them, so the prosecution will have to link him indirectly to the crimes. Lets say someone went and burnt a Police Station, and Nnamdi Kanu is blamed for sending the person. Kanu's Lawyer is going ask how Kanu in London sent him to burn the station in Nigeria. If the suspect says he was instructed on Radio Biafra, the case is dead because Kanu never spoke to him directly. If the Person says another person close to Kanu, sent him, Kanu will deny the person. If he says he spoke to Kanu directly, unless he saved the discussion, the case is dead. And even if he saved the discussion, it had better be in a format that clearly identifies Kanu. Trying to prove that someone in a faraway country did something elsewhere, is very difficult at best of times, unless you have hard irrefutable evidence. All I see the federal government has so far is hearsay. |
Friend22:Twonof Britain's largest media houses have already reported on Kanu's arrest
|
G450:The whole thing was made up by DSS |
Nigeria’s government illegally detained and repatriated Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of a separatist movement active in the country’s southeastern region, according to his U.S. lobbyists. BW Global Group LLC said it’s confident that Kanu, who heads the Indigenous People of Biafra, or IPOB, was captured in another county “via an unlawful rendition by the Nigerian security forces.” Kanu hired the firm in March to advocate for his secessionist group within the U.S. Department of State and Congress. Kanu, who fled Nigeria in 2017 while on trial for treason, resurfaced in the country on June 27 and appeared before a federal court in the capital, Abuja, two days later where his court case was adjourned for a month. The IPOB leader was “intercepted through the collaborative efforts of the Nigerian intelligence and security services,” Attorney General Abubakar Malami said on June 29 without providing any further information about how or where he was seized. BW Global, which didn’t specify where they understand Nigerian forces caught Kanu, said his unlawful rendition “would violate international law.” A complaint about the treatment of Kanu, a dual Nigerian-British citizen, has been made to the U.K. High Commission in Abuja, the Washington-based company said by email on Thursday. The High Commission said Kanu wasn’t arrested in or extradited from the U.K. and it was seeking clarification about the circumstances of his detention from the Nigerian government. The U.K. would expect any trial or legal proceedings to follow due process, it said. Kanu has been denied access to legal representation and is currently in the custody of Nigeria’s secret police, the Department of State Services, his lawyer Ifeanyi Ejiofor said by phone on Friday. The arrest warrant for Kanu was “lawfully and judiciously procured” from the court after he breached its bail conditions “with impunity,” Umar Gwandu, the attorney general’s spokesman, said by text message. He declined to respond to questions about the circumstances of the IPOB leader’s return to Nigeria. Kanu has been represented by a lawyer throughout the judicial process, Gwandu said. Nigeria’s government declared IPOB a terrorist group in 2017 and has blamed recent attacks targeting security agents in southeastern Nigeria on the group’s armed wing. Malami has accused Kanu of inciting deadly violence against personnel of the Nigerian state while based abroad. — With assistance by David Herbling https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-02/nigeria-secessionist-leader-illegally-repatriated-lobbyists-say?utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=url_link&cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_medium=social |
Built2last:Nobody knows where he was arrested, I have heard the names of every country under the sun |
FreeIgbos:Buhari made a Rockstar out of Nnamdi Kanu, now he is set to make Nnamdi Kanu an international Rockstar ![]() |
DeltaFire:Well now that Kanu has been arrested, you can finally find something worthwhile to do with your life. |
Britains biggest and most widely read Newspaper, The Sun, as well as media giant, BBC, have both carried the story of the arrest of IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu. Nnamdi Kanu gained national attention when he was arrested by the Buhari regime in 2015. He was later released and left the country after a military invasion of his house in 2017. It seems he is now set to get an even bigger international attention with his second arrest.
|
tiger28:That means they should bring the evidence to court. As far as we know, IPOB and Nnamdi Kanu have always maintained that they are not responsible for killing anyone. So if they have any evidence, let them feel free to bring it out. But if it is only hearsay and speculation they have, they have nothing |
BJanta:Trust me, if the federal government sends Soldiers to your house to kill you for no reason, you would jump bail too Dead men dont go to court |
Proffdada:So if you were the prosecutor and the judge told you to show proof that did anything, you will bring a message written on facebook or twitter? The judge will throw the case out |
DubaiLandLord:Not unless you can prove it was his men that did it, and on his orders |
Up Sowore Omoyele Sowore wrote: "#FreeKanu Now! Asking for self determination is not a crime!"
|
SenatePresdo:Amen |
oluztx:Its one of the most badly photoshopped pictures I have ever seen. The way to know is to look at the hands and face. The hands are so clear but the face is cloudy |
thebosstrevor1:Nnamdi Kanu may have been arrested but only a complete idiot will believe that this is him in this badly photoshopped picture |
The News going round is that IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu, has been arrested and returned to Nigeria. It looks like its true as Kanu has been silent for a while and Malami announced it. Whether he has been arrested or not, we Igbos must keep going for self determination and independence. You dont need Nnamdi Kanu to know that Nigeria will never work. The Igbo nation must continue on its irreducible path to independence. Thanks |
Hunchogee:We Asaba people are Igbos, and when the time comes for seperation, we are following our fellow Igbos to Biafra. This your South South whatever na una business |
Ifearnoevil:You have a point there |
Referendums usually come in the form of a question. When a referendum is held, two things are vital. The question and answer must clear and unambiguous. During the Scottish referendum of 2014, the question that was put to Scotland was - Should Scotland be an independent country?", which voters answered with "Yes" or "No". 55.3% of Scotland voted No, while 44.7% voted Yes. So Scotland remained with Britain Since Nigeria has no constitutionally recognised Regions, the Biafran referendum will have to be by Local Governments. I think the question that should be asked in the Biafran referendum should be - Should your Local Governments become part of the proposed Republic Of Biafra? Yes or No The Local Governments that vote Yes by at least a 51% majority or more, will become the Republic Of Biafra |
Yyeske:Who is they? Even the first Republic of Biafra comprised most of what you are calling "SS". Restructuring is not in constitution, it does not mean that many people are not agitating for it. Referendum may not be in the constitution, it does not mean that IPOB cannot agitate for it. |
One problem Yorubas have is they feel that Igbos must reason like, and emulate them. I dont think that Yorubas realise that Igbo/Hausa/Yoruba are very different people who are only united by the accident of colonialism. Nnamdi Kanu commanded mammoth crowds but it would have been useless for him to use his followership to seek political power, infact, doing that would have meant the end of IPOB Nigeria is not structured in a way that helps someone like Kanu to achieve his aim of Biafra through a political process. People in power do not want Nigeria to break up and even if IPOB managed to get piliticians who are sympathic into office, those people would just make noise about Biafra for a while before the trappings of office will make them forget about IPOB. |
Throwback:You answered your iwn question with the above. A mere pressure group can make any demands it wants on government. It is not new, other pressure groups such the NLC and NANS have done so in the past. What is important is if the pressure group is making the demand legally and without "organised violence" Take IPOB for example, it wants a referendum conducted in the SE/SS geopolitical zone. Chapter 4 of the constitution allows everyone freedom of association, movement, expression and belief. IPOB is allowed to demand referendum, agitate, protest and even believe in Biafra or the break up of Nigeria as long as the do not use violence to achieve their aim. They do not have to be a political force. The question is, has IPOB used violence in its agitation to achieve Biafra ir a referendum for Biafra? No they have not. Clashes between civilians and Police/Army is a regular thing that occurs all over the world. Even the Police and Army have been known to clash from time to time. But having the occassional clash here and there is not enough to label any group as terrorists. Having clash does not make an organisation violent, what makes an organisation violent is if they use violence to achieve their aim even when there is no clash. IPOB, has not used violence for its aims, they dont carry arms and they have not killed or touched anyone. They are entitled to make any demands they want, nobody said that the government must grant their demands, but they have the right to make demands. |
I ask every well meaning Igbo right now, when is the best time to develop your economic potentials? Today or never!Only free people develop themselves and their economic potential. Igbos cannot develop themselves when it is Abuja that decides everything. Self development comes with freedom and sovereingty. When Igbo land is free from Nigeria, it will develop its self |
Fake news everywhere |
Throwback:Stop talking nonsense, you Buhari. Talking about war when self determination groups are talking about referendum. The UK uded referendum in 2014 for Scotland. The same UK used referendum last year to leave the EU. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (of 100 pages)
