Budaatum's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Budaatum's Profile › Budaatum's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 (of 1630 pages)
Ranchhoddas:I was once at a meeting at a friend of mine where they were discussing what to do with a destitute woman and her three children in their church. TBJ had healed her husband of hiv. The man was so grateful, he gave TBJ a house in gratitude and stopped taking his medication. He then fell ill and was rushed to the doctor who found out he'd stopped taking his medication. "You stupid man" doctor said, "do you not know this medication is what stops you from falling ill and dying?" And doctor put him back on medication and man got better, and went back to TBJ to tell him what had happened. "O you of little faith" said TBJ, and 'cured' the man again of hiv and the man gave him a second house in gratitude. But soon after not taking his medication he fell ill again and was rushed to the doctor who put him back on drugs and he got better, again. When he had recovered, he went back to TBJ and TBJ cured him again and told him to have more faith, and he gave TBJ his final and last house. And when he fell ill, he refused to go to the doctor and refused his medication because finally, we was having faith. The meeting I was at were of the Catholic Church he'd always attended and where he had left his destitute wife and children because he had had faith in TBJ and given him his three houses and had died! |
vaxx:An inability to not even be smart enough to improve, perhaps? |
vaxx:Cunning craftiness? Superior technology and smartness? |
Well, whether one calls it smartness or savagery is really a choice of perspective. I would say we weren't smart enough to resist their deception and savagery. Same difference to me and not the point per se. As to the record regarding agriculture, medicine and economy, and how well we were doing, one could argue that the records show that ancient Egypt was more advanced than most of Europe, but I can't from that infer that Africa was more advanced than the whole of Europe since Egypt hardly extended over the entire Africa. And prior to the arrival of foreigners amongst my own Yoruba tribe, we were already ravaging ourselves through wars, so I can't say we were peaceful. The battle for supremacy between Obatala and Oduduwa afterall does predate the arrival of Europeans, and is a war going on till today. Arguing such points though, when much more is at stake is just a way of perpetuating our inability to learn and progress, in my opinion. vaxx: |
frosbel2:No one is saying "the black man was always at 'rock bottom'" ! Stop strawmaning people! Blacks never ruled the world! In fact, no race ever ruled the world! They might have ruled parts of it, but never the entire world, and the entire extent of any particular African empire never even ruled the whole of Africa, not to talk of the entire world! frosbel2:I am a black Nigerian living amongst white folks and manage quite a few of them. Do you think I walk down the road subservient to them, or that I am a savage? When I say "go", they go, and when I say "come", they come, first note that! Who's saying we have always been savages here? I suppose sacrificing humans to gods would qualify as savagery, but were the British not savages at some point? Were the Romans not savages at some point? Were the Germanians not savages at some point? How about the Chinese and the Aztecs, all did after all sacrifice humans to their gods at some point, despite the fact that some have rewritten their savage history to hide the fact? Almost every, if not all, races have savagery in their history if you dig back deep enough, is what we are saying, and no nation has progressed by going backwards. You progress by learning from others and when you refuse to learn from others, you decline! Going back to some mythical past state of unsavagery will only perpetuate savagery! Mao tried it and millions died! frosbel2:That's a lie! The Aztecs never ruled the world, despite their greatness! The Chinese, the Indians, the Arabs all never ruled the world despite their greatness! Even the Romans, the Greeks, the Spaniards and the Germans never ruled the world despite their greatness All nations have never at one time ruled the world! In fact, no nation, or race even, has ever ruled the world, and no nation has ever even ruled the whole of Africa! Not Mansa Musa, not the Egyptians, or even the Europeans, for that matter! frosbel2:No we weren't "the only set of people who ABANDONED our way of life WHOLESALE for that of the foreigner"! The entire Europe abandoned their barbaric way of life and accepted foreign Christianity! The whole Arab world abandoned their barbaric way of life and accepted foreign Judaism and called it Islam! Britain abandoned its barbaric way of life and adopted foreign Christianity. And most, and if not all of those places are thriving! frosbel2:Whenever I land in Nigeria, I feel like I have travelled back in time, as far as our religious fervour goes, I guess I know my history. All nations were at the fanatic stage when they 'initially' adopt a foreign religion. Do you know that Europe was thrown into the dark ages through its uncritical fanatical acceptance of Christianity and that it was the arrival of Islam that brought them out of its practice of "virulent forms of religious fanaticism and terrorism"? All over Europe in the dark ages, "Jesus was Lord", and God help you if you disagreed. You'd be burnt at the stake for not going to church at one point! But look at Europe today, thriving, despite Church in every parish. I look out my window and there's four already, albeit one has been converted to flats today and another is a mosque. I wonder what they would have been like if they had stuck to their barbaric ways and not accepted foreign ideology!! frosbel2:As I said, this is where your thread makes sense, but your approach doesn't. You seem to think it is foreign religion that has to die, where I would say it is our religious ideology that has to be killed. And despite the illusion of having learnt foreign religions and abandoned our own, we in fact have just put new wines in the same old bottles - continued our old way of worship but just changed the names of the gods! We Nigerians have this same mindset you speak of to all our gods, whether it be Yahweh, Chukwu, Allah or Ogun, and it will indeed only take us backward until we truly take our "god ideology" to the bottom of the river and bash its heads in, and adopt another! Vaxx started a good point with his post on his thread on the same subject but for some reason has declined to continue it, unfortunately! And forgive me for saying, but you haven't quite shown a capacity for it, yet! Still, subscribe to that thread in case it gets going again. Vaxx does have a lot to teach when he bothers. Whether we like it or not, the 'another' will be steeped in the scientific ideology, which is foreign (since we would not be reinventing the wheel), and will be a religion, at least so far as we propagate it. Going back to some mythical past is not the solution! |
vaxx:I have not argued that we weren't exploited. Please read from the beginning of this thread so that your contribution can be relevant! The smarter people (or 'cunningly crafty', as frosbel2 termed it) would always exploit the less smart, is my argument here. The Romans were able to exploit the Britons for this reason, as were the Spanish the Aztecs, Britain the Chinese, and Europe most of Africa, and so on and on. |
frosbel2:There's none for my tribe either. And finding any that the British did is almost impossible. But one would be deluded to think either did not sacrifice humans since its common to rewrite history and erased much from it that we'd rather people don't know happened. |
DDeliverer:Buhari is not sharing one kobo to anybody. I strongly advice you go and get a job! |
Allee90:He should predict what God did not tell him? Na wa o. |
policy12:Makes one wonder who is confused. |
Johnsown1:And Fr Mbaka might want to consider following those rules! |
ugooinnocent:I thought you should be loving Jesus to die ![]() |
urahara:Oh, that's why I'm bombarding him with education lol. He does not realise that his miseducation is due to his own religion. |
Religious taboos, especially those surrounding priests and titled men, involved a great deal of asceticism. The Igbo expected in their prayers and sacrifices, blessings such as long, healthy, and prosperous lives, and especially children, who were considered the greatest blessing of all. The desire to offer the most precious sacrifice of all led to human sacrifice; slaves were often sacrificed at funerals in order to provide a retinue for the dead man in life to come. There was no shrine to Chukwu, nor were sacrifices made directly to him, but he was understood to be the ultimate receiver of all sacrifices made to the minor deities. |
raptex:Knew it might come across as such. But those who know me know I quote in brown. A good read, won't you say? |
frosbel2:Continue to deceive yourself! My parents’ home, in Umujieze, Nigeria, stands on a hilly plot that has been in our family for more than a hundred years. Traditionally, the Igbo people bury their dead among the living, and the ideal resting place for a man and his wives is on the premises of their home. My grandfather Erasmus, the first black manager of a Bata shoe factory in Aba, is buried under what is now the visitors’ living room. My grandmother Helen, who helped establish a local church, is buried near the study. My umbilical cord is buried on the grounds, as are those of my four siblings. My eldest brother, Nnamdi, was born while my parents were studying in England, in the early nineteen-seventies; my father, Chukwuma, preserved the dried umbilical cord and, eighteen months later, brought it home to bury it by the front gate. Down the hill, near the river, in an area now overrun by bush, is the grave of my most celebrated ancestor: my great-grandfather Nwaubani Ogogo Oriaku. Nwaubani Ogogo was a slave trader who gained power and wealth by selling other Africans across the Atlantic. “He was a renowned trader,” my father told me proudly. “He dealt in palm produce and human beings.” Long before Europeans arrived, Igbos enslaved other Igbos as punishment for crimes, for the payment of debts, and as prisoners of war. The practice differed from slavery in the Americas: slaves were permitted to move freely in their communities and to own property, but they were also sometimes sacrificed in religious ceremonies or buried alive with their masters to serve them in the next life. Read more My Great-Grandfather, the Nigerian Slave-Trader By Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani |
Mr. Trump often lauds strong job growth under his watch and says that the “fake news” would have deemed such numbers “impossible” or “ridiculous” during the 2016 campaign. Yet he neglects to mention that the number of jobs added in the 22 months after his inauguration — 4.2 million — is lower than the 4.8 million jobs added in the 22 months before he took office, undermining the premise of his retrodiction. |
Luke 8:1-16 The seed on good soil is a noble and good heart that hears the word, retains it, and by persevering produces a good crop. |
Slavery in Africa http://autocww.colorado.edu/~toldy3/E64ContentFiles/AfricanHistory/SlaveryInAfrica.html Slavery in Africa - Wiki On Human Sacrifice in West Africa - wiki Human sacrifice was common in West African states up to and during the 19th century. The Annual customs of Dahomey was the most notorious example, but sacrifices were carried out all along the West African coast and further inland. Sacrifices were particularly common after the death of a King or Queen, and there are many recorded cases of hundreds or even thousands of slaves being sacrificed at such events. Sacrifices were particularly common in Dahomey, in the Benin Empire, in what is now Ghana, and in the small independent states in what is now southern Nigeria. According to Rudolph Rummel, "Just consider the Grand Custom in Dahomey: When a ruler died, hundreds, sometimes even thousands, of prisoners would be slain. In one of these ceremonies in 1727, as many as 4,000 were reported killed. In addition, Dahomey had an Annual Custom during which 500 prisoners were sacrificed." In the Ashanti Region of modern-day Ghana, human sacrifice was often combined with capital punishment. In the northern parts of West Africa, human sacrifice had become rare early as Islam became more established in these areas such as the Hausa States. Human sacrifice was officially banned in the remainder of West African states only by coercion, or in some cases annexation, by either the British or French. An important step was the British coercing the powerful Egbo secret society to oppose human sacrifice in 1850. This society was powerful in a large number of states in what is now south-eastern Nigeria. Nonetheless, human sacrifice continued, normally in secret, until West Africa came under firm colonial control. The Leopard men were a West African secret society active into the mid-1900s that practised cannibalism. In theory, the ritual cannibalism would strengthen both members of the society as well as their entire tribe. In Tanganyika, the Lion men committed an estimated 200 murders in a single three-month period. |
Why Democracies Are Turning Against Belt and Road China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), an enormous international investment project touted by Chinese President Xi Jinping, was supposed to establish Chinese soft power. Since late 2013, Beijing has poured nearly $700 billion worth of Chinese money into more than sixty countries (according to research by RWR Advisory), much of it in the form of large-scale infrastructure projects and loans to governments that would otherwise struggle to pay for them. The idea was to draw these countries closer to Beijing while boosting Chinese soft power abroad. Today, however, China faces a backlash to BRI at home and abroad. Many Chinese complain of the initiative’s wasteful spending. Internationally, some of the backlash is geopolitical, as countries grow wary of Beijing’s growing influence. But much of it is simply political. Unlike Western lenders, China does not require its partners to meet stringent conditions related to corruption, human rights, or financial sustainability. This no-strings approach to investment has fueled corruption while allowing governments to burden their countries with unpayable debts. And citizens of many BRI countries have reacted with anger toward China—an anger that is now making itself felt in elections. Far from expanding Chinese soft power, the BRI appears to be achieving the opposite. THE BACKLASH TO BRI Malaysia’s election in May 2018 crystallized the sorts of concerns about Chinese power that have been building within BRI client countries. Mahathir Mohamad defeated the incumbent Prime Minister, Najib Razak by openly campaigning against Chinese influence. He criticized Razak for approving expensive BRI infrastructure projects that required considerable borrowing from China, which Razak used to create an illusion of development while he and his associates plundered state coffers. Since taking office in May, Mohamad has cancelled two of the largest Chinese projects in Malaysia—a $20 billion railroad and a $2.3 billion natural gas pipeline—citing his country’s inability to pay. The backlash has not been limited to Malaysia. Pakistan has received an estimated $62 billion in Chinese lending order to finance projects, including highway and rail infrastructure and a port in Gwadar, and has been bailed out by Chinese banks on multiple occasions. Pakistan’s growing inability to service its international debt, which has ballooned thanks to Chinese lending, has prompted some anti-BRI sentiment in the country—although this avoided becoming a major campaign issue during Pakistani elections in July. The new government of the populist Prime Minister Imran Khan has not followed Malaysia in breaking economic ties with China, but it is evaluating all options for repaying its debt, including potentially suspending or delaying repayment. Thanks to its BRI debt, Pakistan is now planning to enter negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a bailout, despite Khan’s initial opposition to doing so. Far from expanding Chinese soft power, Belt and Road appears to be achieving the opposite. The Maldives, too, has recently brought heavier scrutiny to BRI projects. In September, voters ousted the country’s strongman president, Abdulla Yameen, in favor of the democratic reformer Ibrahim Solih. Solih’s election has brought a reevaluation of Yameen’s heavy borrowing from China, which many worried had abetted official corruption and would leave the country effectively under the control of Beijing. Solih has vowed to revisit some of the Maldives’ BRI projects, and although he is unlikely to back out of major Chinese deals totaling $1.3 billion—including a mile-long bridge to the airport in the capital, Male—he is clearly reassessing his country’s ties with Beijing. Even where governments are not being thrown out of office, they have become warier of BRI lending. In August, Kenya began cracking down on corruption related to the Chinese-built railroad connecting Nairobi and Mombasa, arresting local officials who had used the project to line their pockets. Other countries, such as Uganda and Zambia, are starting to worry as well. In June, the Zambian think tank scholar Trevor Simumba warned that Zambia’s borrowing from China was rapidly becoming unsustainable and expressed concern about the “severe lack of transparency over many key terms” in the loans. These countries are beginning to worry not just about the costs of BRI projects, such as Uganda’s recent highway expansion—in which governments borrow Chinese money to pay Chinese companies to build infrastructure at above-market prices—but about the sustainability of their country’s debt loads and the supposed beneficence of Chinese investment. WHAT WENT WRONG? How did China’s big soft power investment end up alienating the very countries it was supposed to help? One reason is that countries have become wiser to the financial terms associated with BRI. In the early stages of the initiative, many countries perceived Chinese capital as free—or least low-cost—money. In reality, China often lent above market rates from concessional lenders, such as the World Bank, that had slowed lending because of their concerns about rising debt levels. In Pakistan, official interest rates (as set by the central bank) are upward of five percent on debt while some BRI projects are guaranteed returns of at least 30 percent. BRI countries have also become concerned about how China behaves as an investment partner. In 2017, Sri Lanka turned granted the Chinese a 99-year lease on one of its ports in order to avoid defaulting on its BRI loans. Since then, countries have worried about the possible ramifications of failing to repay Beijing. They have also become frustrated with the lack of due diligence on the part of local governments and with China’s heavy-handed insistence on single-bid contracts, which force countries to partner with Chinese firms, and sovereign guarantees, which shift risk onto partner countries rather than Chinese firms. One of BRI’s primary weaknesses was its early selling point: China’s famed no-strings approach to partner governments. Developing countries had long griped about the difficulty of getting projects approved and funded by major Western lenders—including the IMF, the World Bank, and bilateral development agencies like USAID—due to safeguards such as financial sustainability requirements, environmental assessment reports, and anticorruption controls. BRI offered a way around these requirements. But the requirements existed for a reason: Western donor agencies had attached them over time, based on experience, in order to lower the risk of failure. By contrast, China’s refusal to require reasonable safeguards for its BRI projects has nourished authoritarianism, corruption, debt, and the pursuit of economically unsustainable or nonviable projects. As strong evidence has emerged of corruption in major investment projects, citizens in BRI countries have come to see China as both benefitting from and facilitating this corruption. In countries where there is at least some democratic oversight of government, such as Kenya, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Zambia, voters are holding leaders responsible. Governments that remain in power are more carefully scrutinizing projects, fees, and total debt levels. In other words, with Chinese lenders unwilling to demand accountability, voters are doing it for them. LEARNING TO LOVE DEMOCRACY International backlash is not the only problem for BRI. Within China itself, there has been increased grumbling about the largesse lavished upon BRI countries. With Beijing touting the billions of dollars it is spending abroad, many Chinese are asking why that money is not being used to address domestic issues, such health care, housing, and education. Data indicate that Chinese banks investing abroad are generally borrowing U.S. dollars internationally rather than drawing from official foreign exchange reserves, but Chinese critics can be forgiven for not understanding the finer points of global capital markets when their government publicizes China’s large overseas spending and investment. Intellectuals, such as the Tsinghua University law professor Xu Xangrun, have also raised concerns about the perception that Beijing is promoting foreign aid ambition at the expense of domestic spending. Others, such as the political scientist Zheng Yongnian, have warned that the rhetoric around BRI is likely to make other countries fear that China is seeking hegemony. Still other Chinese analysts have criticized the lack of local standards covering everything from financial sustainability to environmental impact. Given the controlled media, it is possible that some of this public criticism of Xi’s signature foreign policy initiative may be a shadow critique of Xi himself. Ironically, the program intended to promote Chinese soft power is prompting an unprecedented level of domestic and international concern. Although Chinese leaders have given some thought to how they might improve the perceptions of BRI in partner countries, there is little evidence that they grasp the financial and political realities driving the backlash. Lending in U.S. dollars forces the recipient countries to run dollar surpluses in order to repay Chinese loans, but many countries lack the capacity to run such surpluses. Many of the investments are long-term infrastructure projects, which can take years to complete and require Chinese banks to roll over debt, but Beijing has demonstrated that it expects to be repaid on time or will take punitive measures, as it did in Sri Lanka. Finally, many BRI countries operate under government systems that allow citizens to voice their displeasure, whether through the press or the ballot box. Unused to democratic oversight and criticism, China is struggling to sell its soft power initiative in places where it cannot simply hide embarrassing or inconvenient details. Since the beginning of BRI, Beijing has preferred to view criticism as nothing more than Western refusal to accept China’s rise. Today, however, the concerns are coming not from the West but from Africa and Asia, where governments are desperate to head off soaring debt problems and the wrath of their people. If Beijing seeks to export the Chinese model or burnish its reputation in the world, it will have to learn to work with democracies, whether it likes them or not. |
Metuh:They plan to go and pray to Atiku to feed them with our looted money, the kind of prayer that does not feed them under Buhari who's doctrine appears to be "if you don't work you must starve". They are the bloody lazy Nigerians we were told about! |
frosbel2:If you go back through to our conversation, you would not that I referred to a mythical past that never existed. Now, let me educate you. Before the white man arrived, we kept and sold slaves to one another. Then the Arabs arrived and slave markets arose in lots of Africa where we sold our own people to Arab traders. And when we sold to the white man in Nigeria and most of West Africa when they arrived, it is we Africans who brought our own people to the coast to sell since the white man could not penetrate into our interiors to get us because a small insect called mosquito and malaria it carried killed them. So, please, what do you mean by "that is not how the black man was"? All our gods accepted human sacrifices so we fought wars and captured people to sacrifice to them. But just like you would find it really difficult to find references to human sacrifice in western Europe, so would you find it difficult, but much less so, to find records of human sacrifice in African history even though it was almost rampant. So again please, what do you mean by "that is not how the black man was"? When our leaders today borrow money from foreigners, they take a huge cut and pocket it then we the people get taxed either directly or indirectly through devaluation of our currency, not given us electricity, roads and proper healthcare and paying us much less than we should be paid, and we still have to pay back the borrowed money which has been pocketed by our so called 'leaders'. That, frosbel2 is modern day slavery and sacrifice of our people, all to satisfy the leaders who have alway satisfied themselves at our expense! So how can you possibly say "that is not how the black man was", when the truth is, "that is exactly how the black man was"? Do you think they are not cunning and crafty enough to re-edit history and religionise you to think there was a mythical past that was much better than it really was? Please do not delude yourself! The 'African leaders' have never had the interest of the people to heart. All they have ever thought about is their selfish selves, and they have always gotten away with exploiting us the people by ensuring we are ignorant about what they get up to, for as long as we remain ignorant they can amass wealth at our expense, which is exactly what they have done in Kenya. Quite a lot of the money borrowed from China and which the Kenyan people will spend the next eternity paying back is in the pockets of the Kenyan leaders. Same as the proceeds of our privatisation ended up in the pockets of our leaders. That, incidentally, is why I fervently campaign against Atiku. Not so much because Buhari is more competent, but because he at least is not selling as many and as much of us as Mr Privatisation Athiefu intends to! frosbel2:The ports in Kenya were not stolen by the Chinese. It is the Kenyan leaders that sold it to them and they pocketed a huge fee for doing so. When we persist in our ignorance, refusing to understand that it is our so called leaders who sell us to foreigners who can't buy us unless we are sold to them by our very own leaders, we are fighting shadows that our leaders hide behind, basically, by religionising us into ignorance whether it be in a church or a mosque or shrine or even the schools they design to do so to mask the fact that they themselves are the exploiters whom we ought to be fighting. Leaders? We need to wake up and learn to lead ourselves, and we do that by unshackleing ourselves from the chains of ignorance which includes the belief in a glorious mythical past with which we are being enslaved! |
Heard a lie on Breitbart! Has Trump gone down from 5b to 1.6b for his wall!? “Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, who is also the budget director, said he was waiting to hear from Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York about a counteroffer the White House presented Schumer over the weekend.” How long before he settles for 0b? |
bender79:And sai my bubu 2019! |
Soon time, some brain dead person will come here and say the judge who decided this is Buhari! Directors of Union Bank should serve time for this illegal movement of money! Bloody enemies of Nigeria! |
Sai my Bubu come 2019! |
I don't particularly have a problem with my atheistic position. I don't after all assume that atheism has an answer to everything. I am comfortable accepting that I would not possibly know the answers to questions like how the universe began but that's no reason to fill in the gap with some ignorant belief if the truth is, "I don't know". My atheism goes along with a scientific way of looking at things with the scientific method being a lens I see through. It gives me a critical mind towards things, which I am better off for having on the whole. I just thank the gods |
Herlertah:That's good advise from your brother. A skill like you have would only develop further and might even become one that makes you able to create drugs that cure diseases that no one has yet found a cure for. Don't despair. Know that you have only just begun a journey of a thousand steps. |
Here is another example of the exploitation you mention, frosbel2. It will continue to happen until we Africans wise up! |
frosbel2:I was going to say, no, not the leaders. And this is where your op against religion, or religious leaders who tell us what to think, comes in. One of the threads I linked to asked if we should continue to accept the lies our parents accepted. My answer is an emphatic, no, we should, and would not. And not only would we not accept it, but we will educate our children not to accept those lies either, and even our parents too, which no doubt takes a lot on our part, but we must at least try. See here what I did to my parents. A lot of the religious people here are so afraid of us that they treat this site like it is porn. They wouldn't dare let their kids see them here least those kids get influenced by our audacious attitude towards their gods and become freely minded like us. But their "resistance is futile", as the Borg would say. Just you observe as they abandon their religious programming and become like us! They one by one, lower their shields and surrender their wits, because "We will add their biological and technological distinctiveness to our own" and there's nothing they can do to stop us. Their minds will adapt to service our illustrious nation. And not as religious drones, as the Borg and our religious leaders et al turn them into. But into free minded people of power who have gorged on the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil and know that they themselves are the god, knowing the difference between that which is right and proper and that which is not. It is we, the people, who need to decide who we are led by. And we are working towards building those people of power who will resist the stupidity the religious peddle which only benefits the so called leaders who's only aim is to cunningly exploit us. I assure you, we are doing very well indeed already with thread after thread on here. The day cometh soon. Despair not! |
frosbel2:I know. And there are many more you could have given - America with Saudi Arabia, China with Hong Kong and Tibet, Spain with Mexico and so many more. But they are all the more reasons for the exploited to wise up. The exploiters will not ever change their exploiting spots! Just as is said, when the hunter learns to shoot without missing, the birds need to start flying without perching. |
Martinez19:This so nice to hear. I'll work really hard to continue to live up to this, always. Thanks. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 (of 1630 pages)


