₦airaland Forum

frank317:
everything happens in ur brain. Mind is just a meaningless word people use to describe activities happening in the brain

HardMirror:
your brain. That is why chemical substances like drugs can affect your thoughts because the alter the networking of your brain cells. Remove the brain and there cant be thoughts. Infuse the brain with the right chemicals and you can alter the thoughts of a man

resurgent2019:
Prove to me that Yoruba or forever halt your lies and deceit!

Every omoluabi supporter of Buhari have criticized his ethnic bigotry since yesterday but you continue supporting this nonsense because you are paid?

I am enraged and disgusted about your continuous lies.

This issue transcends my hate for Buhari and borders on basic decency.

frank317:
There is nothing like mind... There is just brain

HardMirror:
It is a waste talking to someone who does not even know his bible

MuttleyLaff:
The world is a canvass
Everything until the work, was a blank canvass

budaatum:
Next time anyone tells me God is an uncaused uncaused, or however they put it, I'm quoting you!

God is Mary's son. She named him Jesus.

Martinez19:
In the beginning, God created the heaven and earth, meaning that before creation on earth began, the earth and heavens were already established

Before I go to the creation of sun, moon, stars, and plant and animal life, any lack of clarity or disagreement?

Martinez19:
I am sure Christianity is the right one because I have had certain encounter with God. God has never failed me. He is the one who can give you the knowledge of the Bible as I have given you. I tell you, He is real and invisible. I have encountered Him.

MuttleyLaff:
Your case is seeing a signed painting in an art gallery and still saying there is no artist behind the painting

Primesky:
budaatum, it may sound phony, but do not toy with the Holy scriptures!.

Jesus Christ is the only way. You will also notice that this offense about who Jesus really is did not start today, it began right from His days here on earth.

Satan hates to hear us talk about Jesus, let alone believe in Him, because doing so will release us from his prison and grip.

That's why we have all manner of religion, all claiming to serve God, but the contention is against Jesus Christ, why?. Because He is the only way to God. You can call and claim to serve God, but if it's not through Christ, you're on your own. So, I am not, neither will I be surprised if and when different kinds of persons bring up religiouly pious discussions, practices, doctrines and creed, but deny the very person and quality or characteristics of Jesus Christ.

I have hope for you budaatum.

Hairyrapunzel:
Where is the verse that says those who died in the sea remain in the sea or don't go to hell?
Abi no bible verse?


"Only Jehovah's Witnesses, those of the anointed remnant and the "great crowd," as a united organization under the protection of the Supreme Organizer, have any Scriptural hope of surviving the impending end of this doomed system dominated by Satan the Devil." Watchtower 1989 Sep 1 p.19


"In effect, Jesus also conveys Jehovah’s voice to us as he directs the congregation through “the faithful and discreet slave.” (Matt. 24:45) We need to take this guidance and direction seriously, for our everlasting life depends on our obedience." Watchtower 2014 Aug 15 p.21



During the final period of the ancient world that perished in the Flood, Noah was a faithful preacher of righteousness. (2 Peter 2:5) In these last days of the present system of things, Jehovah's people are making known Gods righteous standards and are declaring good news about the possibility of surviving into the new world. (2 Peter 3:9-13) Just as Noah and his God-fearing family were preserved in the ark, survival of individuals today depends on their faith and their loyal association with the earthly part of Jehovah's universal organization." Watchtower 2006 May 15 p.22 "Are You Prepared for Survival?"


"Is it presumptuous of Jehovah's Witnesses to point out that they alone have God's backing? Actually, no more so than when the Israelites in Egypt claimed to have God's backing in spite of the Egyptians' belief, or when the first-century Christians claimed to have God's backing to the exclusion of Jewish religionists." Watchtower 2001 Jun 1 p.16


"Similarly, Jehovah is using only one organization today to accomplish his will. [b]To receive everlasting life in the earthly Paradise we must identify that organization and serve God as part of it." [/b]Watchtower 1983 Feb 15 p.12

"There are billions of people who do not know Jehovah. Many of them in ignorance practice things that God's Word shows to be wicked. If they persist in this course, they will be among those who perish during the great tribulation." Watchtower 1993 Oct 1 p.19


"In the near future this generation will see the foretold “great tribulation” that will bring an end to this present wicked system. (Matt. 24:21) At that time none of Jehovah’s faithful servants, the only ones surviving, will mourn over the destruction of the wicked. To the contrary, they will rejoice, even as Moses and his people rejoiced at the destruction of Pharaoh and his army." Watchtower 1977 Jun 1 p.345

Hairyrapunzel:
Check your dictionary or ask google. Since you believe that your jehovah will slaughter 8 billion people so you and the remaining 7 million jws can live in lala land because you belong to the publishing company called watchtower organization no problem.

Hairyrapunzel:
That's because the Bible which all Christians are bound to follow says that the only way your salvation is guaranteed is by believing in Jesus Christ.

rekinomtla:
Galileo and Copernicus died of natural causes?

rekinomtla:
OK, so if I slapped you and I believe there's nothing morally wrong about it.

While on the other hand, you believe i'm morally wrong.

Who is correct, is my action morally wrong or not? .

rekinomtla:
I insist that a creator is needed to make sense of objective morality, otherwise I don't see how moral realism can make any sense. [s]Most of you atheists here even seem to be arguing for objective morals even tho you claim you moral relativists[/s].

rekinomtla:
Suppose the following situation then:

One person says It is morally wrong to kill someone for personal pleasure.

Another person says it is morally right.

Question: Who is correct according to moral relativism, is it morally right to kill for personal pleasure or is it not?

hush15:
you don process your passport in the UK before ni? if you dont know anything, you keep quiet and let those that have speak

Hairyrapunzel:
You are ashamed that you guys preach that salvation is only guaranteed by joining watchtower organization?

Hairyrapunzel:
The jehovah that is not twisted and all loving says he will slaughter 8 billion people for not joining the publishing company/coporation called watchtower organization and obeying the ever changing Bible interpretation of self appointed 8 old men in new York who call themselves governing body/faithful and discrete slave and also say they are the only channel of communication between God and man today so 8 million Jw can inherit earth and live forever in it because their leaders told them so.


Your God is so all loving yet he can't wait to commit the greatest genocide ever known to man. Clap for yourselves and your jehovah.
Pot Calling kettle black

vaxx:
Either You like it or not, you can never fight me.......

I hope to see you someday, at least talk like a human........it seems we have forgotten that aspect due to internet barrier.

Krissjones:
"I need to understand why men are constantly punished and not women," said Twitter user Malak. "I am a Saudi [woman] and I swear I want them to punish her with him. Laughter, eating at the workplace... where are your limits?"

Television presenter Osama Gaweesh said he was confused with the arrest, asking: "Doesn't [Saudi Crown Prince] Mohammed bin Salman want a new, open Saudi Arabia with concerts and movie theatres and beaches and a 2030 vision?"

While another Egyptian user, Sonia, called it a result of "fragile egos" amongst Saudi men.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-45471549?ns_source=facebook&ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews


Cc lalasticlala mynd44 mukina2

Restroom:
For thousands of years now, many have been led to believe in the doctrine of hell fire.

Biblically, this teaching has no basis.
Some invoke the expression recorded in Revelation
21:8 and Rev 19:20, I.e. the 'lake of fire' or 'lake that burns with sulfur'as evidence of hell fire.

Others point to Jesus parable about the rich man and Lazarus, recorded in Luke 16:19-31.

While these Bible verses speak of punishment in fire, they are not to be taken literally.

The language in which the Book of Revelation was written, were all symbolic. Also, the story of the Rich man and Lazarus, was an illustration directed at the proud pharisees, who believed they were favoured before God. Jesus used the illustration to let the pharisees realized that, things have changed for the ordinary Israelites, with the arrival of the messiah. God stopped using the pharisees to teach the Jews the law, with the coming of Jesus Christ .With the presence of Gods son teaching the Jews directly about God, the spiritual condition of the Jews became elevated while the Pharisees were debased. Seeing the changed condition of the jews, and the judgment message of Jesus against the Pharisees, they became enraged at Jesus.

Interestingly, Jesus Christ ended the role of the Pharisees as teachers of the law, when he established Christianity.Since the birth of the Christian congregation, the ordinary Jews and later the Gentiles, became opportuned to worship God freely.

Yet, as simple as the illustration of the rich man and pharisees were, the religions of today have latched on to it, as proof that hell fire existed. The Pharisees that Jesus directed the message to knew that Jesus was talking to them. They knew the meaning that, spiritually speaking, their position as teachers of the law had changed forever with Jesus presence. And that the common man they looked down upon is now favoured with the previlegde of been taught the way of Christ, which opens to them the direct opportunity of communicating with God.

Hence, to those who misconstrue, the parable of the rich man and Lazarus as proof of hell fire, it is good to read that account again, to get the import of the parable.

According to first John 4:8, God is Love.

Can a God of love burn his sinning creatures in fire?

What do you think?

To answer it clearly, think about yourself for a moment. Can you burn your child in fire for sinning or doing something you forbid?

Can you ?
Well, I can't.

As a human, how many of us even think about using fire as a possible means to punish criminals?

Few, if any.
How many human government burn criminals alive?

None!
If humans in General Dont do it, why do people now want God to do it?
If human government Dont burn criminals in fire, is it God that we now burn his own creature in everlasting fire?

God is love.
If humans, Dont do it, God can't do it.
We are made in God s image, remember.
If you can't do it, because it looks unjust, then, God cannot do it.

Also, there is no record in the Genesis account of creation, of how God created Hellfire and where it is located.Where is hellfire located ?Who created it? Where is evidence that God created it? The bible recorded how God created everything, including the sun, moon and stars.How come it is silent about hellfire?

Now God told Adam, that if he sins against him, he would go back to the dust.Because he created him from the dust. Now if Adam returned to the dust as God told him, how come his children go the hell fire as popularly claimed by churches of today?

God specifically told Adam in Genesis 3:19- For dust you are, and to dust, you will return.

But churches now say, for dust you are and to hellfire you will return.

Can God lie?

Who knows better, God or churches?

Where do we go at death?

Is Adam in hell fire?
Which hell fire?

According to God is statement to Adam, at death, he returned to dust, to a state of none existence.

Adam was none existent before God created him.

At death, he returned to that state signified by dust.

But churches say no. We do not die. We continue to live but in hell fire.
So a lot of people end up believing the big lie that hell fire exist .

God cannot lie.Satan is the only one that can burn sinners in hellfire, an imaginary place he has created to paint God as a wicked person who can debase his human creation by burning the sinners amongst them in hell fire.

Now, did God burn Adam in hell fire after he sinned, and became the first sinner on earth?

What's your answer?

If Adam didn't go to hell fire, as the first sinner, does it make sense to believe that his children and all sinners are in hell fire?

rekinomtla:
Then you shouldn't label anyone action as being morally wrong. It's just wrong for you, your opinion.

rekinomtla:
That's perfectly consistent with objective morality. I can believe something is objectively wrong in one situation but right in another depending on the circumstances.

rekinomtla:
No it is not. Relative means it only a matter of opinion.

sinequanon:
The problem is obvious: if your definition of proof is "what the authorities say", then you cannot prove that the authorities are doing anything wrong. You are in a position where you just have to believe what you are told.

vaxx:
Argument ad hominem fallacy, instead of you to attack the argument you claimed is not universally true, you are now attacking my own personality.

MuttleyLaff:
Sheep rather, and not to be mistaken for sheeple
You could have safely broken the fast with me.

See. If you had said, I would have "sare keremọsa" told you to break it.

I dont usually flaunt menu pics or take pics of them.
I hate doing it and hated myself for doing those two

Things I get to do for country and you budaatum sha

Primesky:
Why did the Jew's pick up stones? Stop twisting scriptures.

MuttleyLaff:
"Abula" - Before and After
Just got back in budaatum